We CAN travel more than speed of light, the key is a "BLACK HOLE" why ? if we sucked in the black hole we'll travel faster than speed of light, that's why LIGHT can't escape from the black hole, the gravity that pulls everything in there (including light) are stronger and everything was FASTER than speed of light inside the black hole.
particles that have no mass travel at the speed of light.
in order to travel faster than the speed of light, you would need to have a negative mass.. which is probably why he doesn't really answer the question. ..
However, he did say that if you could travel faster than the speed of light, you would go back in time.
@TheGuyInUrCloset Scientists at he European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN, outside Geneva say they have clocked subatomic particles, called neutrinos, traveling faster than light
One possible reason for the incredible result is a miscalculation in either the distance or time. Only another test using a different path will tell – which could be carried out using colliders in the U.S. and Japan.
Lol and now scientists have found a way to travel FASTER than the speed of light (only very small particals can do it as far as I know) so this whole video is FALSE.
EEEEERRRRRRRHHH..........crash!!!! Looks like these Neutrinos traveled faster than light, the experiment was done again and the same results basically came about! I think we are going to have to re-think much of what we take as fact as really nothing but observation that actually can be subjective. There are no real laws but just observations. Everytime somebody says "YOU CAN'T" be somewhat doubtful. I feel that the Science community is going in the wrong direction a lot driven by economics.
@intermaniax1 Neutrinos have not gone faster than light tha was just newspaper sensationalism at it's finest. At the time of the result no physicists thought it correct as the result was more than 5 standard deviations out (much worse evidence than a regular result would require, let alone one this big). It was known at the time there was flaws in the equipment, now it is known what the flaw is ( gravitational time dilation was not took into account correctly).
@intermaniax1 It was assumed, and then worked out what would happen if light speed was the ultimate speed and how that would affect the universe, predictions were made from this and then experiments proved the predictions time and time again.
Who's this joker? The girl asked what would happen IF you traveled over the speed of light. It was a hypothetical question. And to correct this numskull, the theory of Special Relativity did not preclude faster than light travel, but rather, that no object of mass could ACCELERATE to such a velocity. There's nothing in that theory that precludes something from having an intrinsic velocity above that of light. That is, something that is ALWAYS traveling faster than light, not accelerated to it.
@itsMinuteMaid "There's nothing in that theory that precludes something from having an intrinsic velocity above that of light"
He says "you" referring to her question. She could not go above the speed of light. The only things that can go above the speed of light are things with imaginary mass. Which almost definitely do not exist for many many reasons.
All one has to do is count the discounts implicit to the comments on this post, and an educated person will get a feel for the level of stupidity and ignorance, that arrogant people project onto public forums like this one. These dweebs are the TV generation, 'further' educated by the insane sensationalism of the NET... hehe Listen kids, David Gross knows what he is speaking about.
He's refering to old physics theories; today many scientist believe we will achieve faster than light travel. It's a matter of technology we don't have yet.
You can if you reduce the mass effects of the crafts external matter, and if the universe is a neutral boson energy field and energy or light are nothing more than the interaction of the bosons with frequency creating the c constant and energy propagation effects. coat your space ship in YBCO and the temperature of space will create the desired results without slowing down the effects of time..... But dont go too fast. :)
well ok but if wee had energy to get to the speed of light that means we don't really need an inffinit amount of energy to get faster then that it's like 1+1 the energy we use to get to the sped of light...idk 2x or maybe 3 x that energy well do it..i think,and im tlking about particules, and i think wee can get some energy from a star...like a red giant...
How does the Higgs-Boson come into play with this??? Since only particles with no mass can travel the speed of light would it someday be possible to identify and repel Higgs-Boson particles to lower an objects mass?? This is assuming that we can identify the Higgs-Boson.
But..."Cherenkov radiation is electromagnetic radiation emitted when a charged particle passes through an insulator at a constant speed greater than the speed of light in that medium." -Wikipedia. Light pressure probably would limit the motion of a body near the speed of light since light from the direction of travel would be blue shifted while that from the opposite direction would be red shifted and the photons would have relatively less energy.
We CAN travel more than speed of light, the key is a "BLACK HOLE" why ? if we sucked in the black hole we'll travel faster than speed of light, that's why LIGHT can't escape from the black hole, the gravity that pulls everything in there (including light) are stronger and everything was FASTER than speed of light inside the black hole.
IndraEMC 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
particles that have no mass travel at the speed of light.
in order to travel faster than the speed of light, you would need to have a negative mass.. which is probably why he doesn't really answer the question. ..
However, he did say that if you could travel faster than the speed of light, you would go back in time.
sniped101 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
sniped101 2 weeks ago
I just thought, if there were particles that traveled faster than the speed of light, would we even be able to observe them?
TheGuyInUrCloset 1 month ago
@TheGuyInUrCloset Scientists at he European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN, outside Geneva say they have clocked subatomic particles, called neutrinos, traveling faster than light
One possible reason for the incredible result is a miscalculation in either the distance or time. Only another test using a different path will tell – which could be carried out using colliders in the U.S. and Japan.
krash332 3 weeks ago
@krash332 do neutrinos have no mass? if they weight the same as light particles then they should travel the same.
sniped101 2 weeks ago
this guy doesnt anwser the question just goes on about why you cant do it what a fun spunge
jessejones14 1 month ago
@jessejones14 he did. he says you would go back in time... Seems you didn't watch the whole video.
fail?
sniped101 2 weeks ago
Lol and now scientists have found a way to travel FASTER than the speed of light (only very small particals can do it as far as I know) so this whole video is FALSE.
ReptileTunes 2 months ago
@ReptileTunes Reference please...
darkosminos 1 month ago
@darkosminos There is no way that this news has gone by for you. Just look it up on the internet. It was discovered pretty recently.
ReptileTunes 1 month ago
@ReptileTunes Neutrinos have NOT been yet proven to travel faster than the speed of light!
darkosminos 1 month ago
@darkosminos thanks for telling him. not sure why people jump on the band wagon without further tests... meh, probably a god believer.
sniped101 2 weeks ago
Old news :D
massgl 2 months ago
@massgl Old WRONG news
massgl 2 months ago
EEEEERRRRRRRHHH..........crash!!!! Looks like these Neutrinos traveled faster than light, the experiment was done again and the same results basically came about! I think we are going to have to re-think much of what we take as fact as really nothing but observation that actually can be subjective. There are no real laws but just observations. Everytime somebody says "YOU CAN'T" be somewhat doubtful. I feel that the Science community is going in the wrong direction a lot driven by economics.
nagone11 3 months ago
if you need infinite amount of energy to travel at the speed of light,
where does the light particles get their energy from ??
aash2009aash 3 months ago
@aash2009aash Soemthing with mass needs an infinite amount of energy.
Light does not have mass,
9hello123 2 months ago
He take 1min++ to go in Main Subject lol
HHM520 4 months ago
If particles move at the speed of light only if they have no mass
Den were basically weight less with no gravity around us like if someone is falling dey are weight less
MrUnknown747 4 months ago
neutrinos travel faster then the speed of light
intermaniax1 4 months ago
@intermaniax1 Neutrinos have not gone faster than light tha was just newspaper sensationalism at it's finest. At the time of the result no physicists thought it correct as the result was more than 5 standard deviations out (much worse evidence than a regular result would require, let alone one this big). It was known at the time there was flaws in the equipment, now it is known what the flaw is ( gravitational time dilation was not took into account correctly).
9hello123 4 months ago
@9hello123
thank you for the clarification.
how do they know that light is the ultimate speed.
intermaniax1 4 months ago
@intermaniax1 It was assumed, and then worked out what would happen if light speed was the ultimate speed and how that would affect the universe, predictions were made from this and then experiments proved the predictions time and time again.
9hello123 2 months ago
Who's this joker? The girl asked what would happen IF you traveled over the speed of light. It was a hypothetical question. And to correct this numskull, the theory of Special Relativity did not preclude faster than light travel, but rather, that no object of mass could ACCELERATE to such a velocity. There's nothing in that theory that precludes something from having an intrinsic velocity above that of light. That is, something that is ALWAYS traveling faster than light, not accelerated to it.
itsMinuteMaid 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@itsMinuteMaid "There's nothing in that theory that precludes something from having an intrinsic velocity above that of light"
He says "you" referring to her question. She could not go above the speed of light. The only things that can go above the speed of light are things with imaginary mass. Which almost definitely do not exist for many many reasons.
9hello123 4 months ago
Make it own faster than speed of light test... Make a video of you turning on/off a flashlight and then fast-forward it, thats it!
fa18chornet 5 months ago
All one has to do is count the discounts implicit to the comments on this post, and an educated person will get a feel for the level of stupidity and ignorance, that arrogant people project onto public forums like this one. These dweebs are the TV generation, 'further' educated by the insane sensationalism of the NET... hehe Listen kids, David Gross knows what he is speaking about.
doceigen 5 months ago
actually if you travel faster than the speed of light you will go back to the time were you were travelling at the speed of light -,-
TheSunnycar 6 months ago
light is made of photons, and photons have mass
nofatchxplzthx 6 months ago
@nofatchxplzthx photons don't have mass
iacobradu 5 months ago
@iacobradu YES they do, its been proven, look it up
nofatchxplzthx 5 months ago
@nofatchxplzthx No they don't. Virtual photons do, but that wasn't what you or he were referring to.
9hello123 4 months ago
hahha he has no idea what hes talking about
txbloodlordxd 8 months ago
@txbloodlordxd He is a professor. How the hell does he not know what he is talking about? Maybe you should pay attention and shut up.
ARepublicanVictory 8 months ago
Comment removed
valarmanwe 7 months ago
That idiot in the video is just talking text-book and knows nothing. Pointless asking someone like him anything.
razor71927 10 months ago
He's refering to old physics theories; today many scientist believe we will achieve faster than light travel. It's a matter of technology we don't have yet.
JLR0958 1 year ago
@JLR0958
Lets see some sources on that
vlaydros 10 months ago
is there a speed of dark? and what is "light" is that only visible light?
swisstoniisgay 1 year ago
@swisstoniisgay A gay question!
razor71927 10 months ago
@razor71927 twat
swisstoniisgay 10 months ago
@swisstoniisgay You cannot even spell either!
razor71927 10 months ago
You can if you reduce the mass effects of the crafts external matter, and if the universe is a neutral boson energy field and energy or light are nothing more than the interaction of the bosons with frequency creating the c constant and energy propagation effects. coat your space ship in YBCO and the temperature of space will create the desired results without slowing down the effects of time..... But dont go too fast. :)
SASNIGHTCRAWLER 1 year ago
Would we ever travel trouch space with the speed of light,Would that be posible?
dnvr3 1 year ago
well ok but if wee had energy to get to the speed of light that means we don't really need an inffinit amount of energy to get faster then that it's like 1+1 the energy we use to get to the sped of light...idk 2x or maybe 3 x that energy well do it..i think,and im tlking about particules, and i think wee can get some energy from a star...like a red giant...
zack164 1 year ago
but if you can use large magnetic fields to warp space around a ship, then what will happen? then relativity does not apply?
Revolucionario02 1 year ago
How does the Higgs-Boson come into play with this??? Since only particles with no mass can travel the speed of light would it someday be possible to identify and repel Higgs-Boson particles to lower an objects mass?? This is assuming that we can identify the Higgs-Boson.
jamesdotess 1 year ago
How does "tachyon condensation" work?
httprover 1 year ago
But..."Cherenkov radiation is electromagnetic radiation emitted when a charged particle passes through an insulator at a constant speed greater than the speed of light in that medium." -Wikipedia. Light pressure probably would limit the motion of a body near the speed of light since light from the direction of travel would be blue shifted while that from the opposite direction would be red shifted and the photons would have relatively less energy.
httprover 1 year ago