Added: 2 years ago
From: gamingeagle19
Views: 667
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (77)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ACORN was found innocent of all charges after the fact. The videos were literally faked; O'Keefe wasn't dressed as a pimp, and he inserted questions he never even asked to make it seem like the ACORN employees were agreeing to terrible things.

    I think you missed the part in one of your own articles where ACORN was working with authorities before the raid to cull fake registrations. Also, registration fraud is not voter fraud.

    You sound like a college libertarian.

  • @BenkaiDebussy I provide links. Where's yours?

  • What a POS! anything about ACORN that does not makes it clear that the whole 'pimp' story was FALSELY EDITED.

    Regarding the 'voter fraud' there has not been a single case of ACORN committing 'voter fraud.' Want to know the real story check out bradblog

    This jerk doesn't know squat.

  • @PlacitasRoy yeah, "falsely edited"

    okay pal.

  • China has taken over as the #1 economic superpower and the US will never be the same

  • Can you provide some links, or evidentiary support for any of the things you're talking about? I'd like to see the embezzling ACORN man, and the one who dragged the handicapped man down to the office and had him register as a democrat. If you don't agree with LV that's fine but at least he's got some evidence to back up his claims. And can show people where they can look up facts for themselves.

  • are you blind or did you miss the 5 links I have in the description box. And the handicapped story was from a local news story. There's a video somewhere on Youtube.

  • My apologies, I usually don't bother to look at the boxes unless there is something of value in the video as well. I'm not saying ACORN does not have some corrupt members, but I am saying that if you think FOX isn't just as corrupt you're out of your mind.

  • alright but honestly, I've never seen Fox do anything that can't be explained with a rational reason. Most people don't even give them a chance. They just believe whatever they hear about them without even watching them. But ACORN has had too many controversies to be considered noble and whole. The FBI closing down whole buildings in 15 states prove that.

  • That's fair, I can't say anything on the subject of ACORN because I don't know enough about it. I don't consider it anything. However I have studied enough of FOX to know that there is absolutely no way that they can be considered noble or whole. Take O'Reilly for example...Forget him being liberal or conservative, his whole style of talking over people, misrepresenting facts, and insensitivity to matters is outrageous. That's what I was seeing in Megyn Kelly in this vid.

  • well obviously Fox isn't noble and whole. that would be dumb. But as for O'Reilly, he's a commentator and makes it very clear that he does not tolerate liars, dodgers, or just plain assholes. He doesn't even yell that much. It just seems like he does because of all the videos on Youtube but all of those are spawning almost 10 years of him on the air.

  • I don't think he should tolerate any of those things, but there is a decorum of journalism that Bill clearly lacks. And I'm not talking about the people he berates that clearly deserve it, i'm talking about others that don't. And regardless of how long he has been on the air, he does things that he should not regardless of how few and far between. And after 10 years on the air he should know better.

  • yelling at people doesn't make you a bad journalist. If anything being silent is worse than shouting than down if they are scum. You also mentioned people that don't deserve it. How about an example.

  • I agree being silent and letting scum promote their points is a wrong thing to do. However, we can't ever HEAR the other side because it's always overrun with O'Reilly's mouth. And for an example of people who don't deserve his bs, how about the kid that was kidnapped and raped over like 50 times and O'Reilly mentioned how fun that must have been for him. Come on...

  • I think a PM would be best suited.

  • ACORN founder Wade Rafke's brother Dale Rafke stole a little under a Million bucks in 2000. It was covered up.

    When exposed Wade got the money to replace it from the Tides Foundation. No one was prosecuted.

  • yet another reason to not like ACORN

  • @gamingeagle19 Wow. I never knew that. Can you provide links to the proof? If you're going to put that out there you should be better then Faux News, right? I'm not saying it's not true. I simply don't know. But I see so much of this kind of thing on Faux, it would be nice to see someone like yourself back up your post.

  • @ixnay66 I have plenty of links in the info box.

  • Again Voter registration fraud is NOT voter fraud. Is it illegal, hell yes, but believe me, but they didn't defraud the electoral sysytem, they defrauded ACORN.

    This equivocation of Voter registration fraud to voter fraud is dangerous as it completely transforms the issues and turns the victims of fraud into suspects of fraud.

    Get ur facts and believe me, Fox News is NOT fair and balanced

    BTW MSNBC isn't simply liberals- who is Joe Scarborugh in the Morning?

  • Seriously- 1, ACORN isn't corrupt- there are certain individuals they hired who lied about who they RegistereD as voters

    2- Voter registration fraud is NOT Voter Fraud- tell me how Mickey Mouse will vote

    3- ACORN brought employees to FEDS b4 Fox talked about it

    4- Ur view on Fox is absurd- Fair and balanced my ass- the only channel that does that is CNN

  • wow I just deleted the comment I wrote because I see other people have said similar facts and you just don't get it.

    I'm tired so I'll resort to immature name calling since you like it when FOX does it... it's ok... so

    You're just another shut in, in love with an overly made-up-FOX-barbie .... I hope you're proud. I'm cutting your mic.

  • And you don't seem to get that ACORN is an immensely corrupt organization.

  • I do get that they are flawed but not to the extent Conservative Barbie made them out to be. I mean, ACORN did whatever ACORN did but that doesn't change the fact that the interview was totally b*tchy and unfair. They had the right to defend themselves and she didn't let them do so. U can't argue that anyone with half a brain can see that. This is what FOX does. There are countless other examples. You can't defend FOX for their garbage.

  • The interview was "unfair" because the representative wouldn't admit to any wrongdoing at all. As far as he was concernec ACORN was made of sunshine and kittens. 15 FBI raids in as many states and many more investigations means ACORN should not participate in anything period. End of story.

  • You honestly believe it was the ACORN rep that was despicable? She was sarcastic from the very beginning, she talked over him the whole time, and was a completely rude "journalist". And I'm using that loosely.

  • I have stated many arguments - but that one in particular you dont seem to get, or until now acknowledge. but im fast losing hope that you can see the obvious. maybe its because you have the hots for her or you love Fox

    anyway if you want a summary of my arguments - watch the following on youtube 'Megyn Kelly Yells Over Guest and Smears Him' it should be the first link and is about 8 minutes long.

    Cenk makes a much better case than I...

  • I could say the same about you. You seem to ignore the 15 RAIDED FACILITIES ALL THROUGHOUT THE USA! Several higher up members of ACORN including one state manager admitted to sending in fake registry forms. YOU fail to see that this company is corrupt or at the very least very irresponsible.

  • ermm nope - i think she knew exactly what she was saying, she knew what her leading statements were going to be - dont be naive. her aim all along was to stir up anger amongst viewers. yet again 13 employees out of 13000 across the WHOLE of the USA were convicted of voter registration fraud and in some cases, purgery. by all means you can criticise the company - but there was NO perspective. in that interview she threw unfounded accusation after accusation at him, which he rightly defended

  • "by all means you can criticise the company - but there was NO perspective"

    You've said that so many times I guess that's your only argument. It was more than 13. You just refuse to see it. 15 facilities were RAIDED because of massive voter registration fraud. This is more than just a tiny insignificant problem. They are full of corruption. Why would she accuse a guy that runs the company of voter fraud when he never registered illegally? She meant to say voter registration fraud.

  • yet again, out of 13000 employees...again no perspective.you know damn well what she was implying. suspecting is one thing. but yet again after there was found to be NO cases of voter fraud she still jumped straight into the 'interview' by stating falsely and rather strongly 'you were found guilty of voter fraud' she repeated this more than once. Another clear cut example of fox distorting the facts, outright lying and stirring up anger

    im not claiming Acorn are perfect, but she went too far

  • Don't you think that she just meant to say voter registration fraud. She was angry and wasn't thinking clearly. They were convicted of many many things during the campaign and this wasn't the first time. She may have been rough but the guy wouldn't accept any responsibility. It's like he did nothing wrong. ACORN has had controversy after controversy and they don't seem to care.

  • You're right on Gamineagle- Fox News catches a lot of flack for no reason other than the fact that they give both sides. But God forbid they (or anyone) give the Conservative viewpoint. It goes without saying that the other networks are 100% liberally biased. Enjoyed the video!

  • OK gamingeagle19 - The 'voter fraud' that she kept referring to were cases of Acorn employees staying at home and filling out forms. Bad? yes - does that justify the fear campaign that fox news ran for months on it - absolutely not! where was the perspective?? we re talking 13 out of 13000 employees here - what organisation do you know of that doesnt have employees that steal from their employers??? fyi there wasnt ONE single case found of voter fraud that Megyn kelly kept going on about

  • Keep in mind that there wasn't a "fear campaign". There were many reports of fraud before the election not just 13 reports. Over a dozen facilities were raided by the FBI and local officials because of massive voter registration fraud. It wasn't a bad guess to say that there would be voter fraud. There could have easily been fraud. Thankfully it was all sorted out. Thanks for the respectful response.

  • Lol - of course there was! even from that very same interview, i quote ' you re going to send child rapists out into the streets??' if thats not fear mongering i dont what is. Also yes it is/was a bad guess because there was NO voter fraud. yet instead of apolosing for making inaccurate statements she launched attack after attack... again referencing voter fraud - what the??

    sorry buddy - that is BAD journalism period. i should know because thank god i have the bbc instead

    no problem

  • "you re going to send child rapists out into the streets??' if thats not fear mongering i dont what is"

    That's what they were doing. They were hiring rapists and other felons without even checking them. And what are they psychic? If you are hearing reports of facilities getting raided because of massive vrf then why wouldn't you suspect possible voter fraud.

  • Dude, you should watch "Outfoxed: Rupurt Murdoch's War on Journalism" and find out how Murdoch basically Owns the media and how the promote a Republican agenda all of the time. Also, you are totally wrong on LiberalViewer's videos and I wish I had time to take you to task but I have to go to class. TTYL

  • I'm not a big fan of news anchors expressing their personal opinions . . . ever.

    They're not news anchors. They're columnists. Mouthpieces for the corporations that hire them.

    But Olbermann's reverence for the U.S. Constitution certainly came a lot closer to where the news media should be than O'Reilly's reverence for shouting idiotic bullshit.

  • You know I'm sure, gamingeagle19, that ACORN carefully sorted the signatures into piles:

    the signatures they knew were phony, the ones they thought were phony, the ones that they weren't sure about, and the ones they felt comfortable about.

    They were checked and sorted before final submission. Their policy was to have their street workers sort them but not make the final decisions themselves. Makes sense to me.

  • You would think so but there were higher up members like CEO's that were arrested for voter registration fraud as well. There was massive corruption in ACORN. Probably still is.

  • All of Fox News's ACORN b.s. was part of their campaign to get John McCain elected in November. If a network is campaigning so hard for one political party, it's not really a news network.

    You can't judge the merits of their ACORN by counting how many stories they pumped out. They pumped them out because it was an election year--not because they had any useful information to report.

  • You aren't paying attention. My information isn't coming from Fox. None of my links are related to Fox. And if those aren't enough I could easily find you a dozen more.

  • boy do you have you head in the sand.

  • That would only apply if I had no idea what's going on. I pay attention. ACORN is in trouble for a reason. Look at my links.

  • Saying O'Reilly is a moderate is a joke. As for an MSNBC conservative you have Joe Scarborough.

    On to Fox "hearing" other viewpoints, the anchors make it abundantly clear what their opinion is even if provided FACTS that they are wrong. Journalism is about facts...opinion is for editorials. Unfortunately all 24 hour news lends itself to commentary to fill time... however Fox is the most documented case of purposely reporting FALSE things to further their conservative agenda.

  • O'Reilly is moderate. He is a registered independent and is fair to Obama. Joe is the only conservative on MSNBC and he hates most other conservatives so it's hard to count him. Yes Fox is conservative but they have liberal guests and differing views on there all the time and all of the "doucumented" falsehoods that Fox tells are sketchy at best mostly relying on out of context clips and using websites run by people that hate conservatives like MoveOn and MediaMatters.

  • O Rielly is registered independent? Uhmm O Rielly from 1994-2000 in Nassau County and registered Independent soon afterward. They got a copy of his Voter Registration Card and when confronted about it, he claimed "Independent wasn't on the list so I checked Republican."

    For 6 years??????

  • voter registration fraud that lead to bastards being paid for not doing their jobs not because they cheated the election

  • if you couldn't watch the whole thing or you didn't watch the whole interview, you can't talk about it mate. moreover, there was absoutely evidence of voter fraud. if so, i'd like to see the evidence of any lawsuits or criminal charges filed. your move

  • I guess you missed the annotation saying I did watch the whole thing.

    As for the evidence you had to watch Fox. They had lawyers that were prosecuting members of Acorn and there were local stories in the areas where it was happening. I will find links better supporting it later.

  • there's a difference bwetween a lawyer interview & an actual decision made in an actual, legal proceeding. don't you think? it's easy to make your accusations & say "you should believe me now because i'll prove it later". maybe those prosecutors will use that argument in court. do you think that'll fly too?

  • in the final analysis, fox has no proof. neither do your prosecutors. in addition, this was more an issue of employees being derlict of their duty at their job, not voter fraud. ACRON co-operated & their own employees were convicted. beside that, meghan was dead wrong in her assessment that ACORN was supplying census enumerators. that's not even close to how it works. the local stories were of people making phony registraions. but i'd love for you show me where they led to phony votes. i'll wait

  • I know in the end there wasn't any voter fraud but they didn't start co-operating until they were exposed. I will find links proving it and if I can't then I will retract.

  • so you're convicting them for voter fraud when there's not even an indictment? c'mon young brother, you are SO much smarter than that.

  • I'm convicting for allowing such a ridiculous amount of voter registration fraud. And not just in this election but in the past elections they have had controversies as well.

  • derelctions of duty? yes. voter fraud? no. ACORN coud have had its employees peddling widgets for example & it'd be an issue of bad hiring practice; not fraud. yes, the nature of what they do is voter registration but they co-operated. cheney's man. mike connell, the guy that was gonna testify about ballot fraud (co-operation) was murdered before his plane got into the air. there were recount issues in '00. you ain't complaining about that. you're being disingenuous right now dude.

  • btu what's more is that you, i, allan (liberalviewer) or any individual aren't given ordinance to convict ANYONE. that's for a jury to do. again, find your evidence & present it. be sure to keep your word on that. 'til then, you can't say much & maintain your credibility my friend

  • I'm sending you links now.

  • from what i can find the FBI only raided the Nevada office. where are you getting this 15 states stuff?

    the article in which you posted holds no factual content, only speculation which was my point.

    i don't need a link to prove that the case against ACORN by stuart was thrown out of court by lack of evidence (which was the main point in your link) because you can just look tath up it's all over the web.

  • "You can be biased and still be fair and balenced"

    How so? Depending if one's not TOO biased, fair maybe. But how is it possible to be balenced and unbiased? You can get into semantics all you like.. but thier slogan still IMPLIES unbiased. It would be much more honest if they called themselves 'Your Conservative News Channel'.

    Five stars though. And I'ma send this vid out to my friends list as well.

  • Because you can pick one side and still here from the other sides thus being fair and balanced.

  • Comment removed

  • Awesome. Right one. Perfect portrayal. Home run.

    ACORN rented the buses that went to AIG execs' homes and protested the employees. Disgraceful.

    People are waking up.

  • Fox misleads people into thinking ACORN was trying to commit voter fraud in the election when the fact is people who were hired by ACORN, who had to reach a quota of 20 applications to get paid, were defrauding ACORN by handing in fake applications. You have been tricked by Fox into thinking this was about people who were going to vote fraudulently when it wasn't even about that, it wasn't about "voter fraud," it was about employees ripping off ACORN by handing in fake forms.

    Please subscribe

  • at the very least it was MASSIVE registration fraud in many states. It may have been employees but they didn't take care of it well or the FBI wouldn't have to raid facility after facility to fix it. They have terrible rules and standards and it gets them into a lot of trouble.

  • Do you understand the point I made? It is disgraceful for Fox to mislead the public like it has. You didn't even acknowledge my point. Why? And where is your link to prove that "this stuff went on for weeks and then all of a sudden Fox brought it up and then the firings started happening."

    Check out my videos, you may like them.

  • I got your point and I don't buy it. Employees are the company. If they choose bad people that's on them. As for the link I'm going to bed but I will find it tomorrow. And Fox didn't mislead. ACORN needs a serious overhaul. They have screwed up for the last time. It shouldn't be that hard to just get people to register.

  • "John McCain's campaign has accused ACORN of trying to rig the election for Democrats."

    Given the facts, it was extremely dishonest of McCain's campaign to make claims like that, or maybe they were brainwashed by Fox news?

    But University of Washington law professor Eric Schnapper says the idea of fake cards turning into real votes is a myth."

  • Well at that time when dozens of reports of VRF were going on it wasn't unreasonable to think that they were doing it on purpose. I mean Fox and McCain aren't psychic. If you see that facilities all over the state are being raided what conclusion would you come to?

    How could one organization allow so many false forms to float around. I just woke up and I have things to do so no links today but I will find them eventually.

  • you don't seem to understand. "Larry Lomax, the registrar in Clark County, Nev., said "I don't think Acorn consciously sets out to turn in fraudulent forms. I just think the people they hire find it incredibly easy to rip off their bosses and turn in fake forms."

    Election officials say that registrations under names such as Mickey Mouse or Dallas Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo suggest that Acorn workers were trying to fill their quota of 20 applications to get paid, not to steal the presidency."

  • I watch the liberal viewer as well, but i dont feel that he is distorting the truth. He is posing questions. You said that acorn only fired the people after fox got involved, but where is your proof of that? did you mean Acorn only fired people when they found out that their employees were doing it. Because if thats the case, that makes logical sense. How could acorn fire them before they knew? Voter REGISTRATION fraud is a different issue totally, and happens all the time.

  • Yes voter registration fraud happens a lot but the folks at ACORN give massive fraud a whole new meaning. And I think that putting dead people and disney characters down as "registered" voters should send a huge red flag to the guys in charge. This stuff went on for weeks and then all of a sudden Fox brought it up and then the firings started happening. I will look for links to prove that point.

  • If acorn found out their employees were turning in fake forms. Then i'm sure they had to investigate for themselves. You can not fire someone without knowing if what they did was intentional. With the millions of forms im sure it took time. My sister did the same thing in college. Sears would pay for Credit cards apps. So she would forge names and SS#'s and get paid. But that in no way says that Sears is committing credit card fraud.

  • I would love a link that shows fox's involvement made acorn investigate these claims of fraud. However, if acorn had already began investigating before fox got involved. It in no way shows that they were intentionally trying to fraud the voting system. It just means that their system for voter registration needs to be changed, to safe guard against employees negligent behavior.

  • MORE:

    In addition, the link in your video description is a press release from a group organized by Rick Berman, a lobbyist for the hotel and restaurant industry, who's been attacking ACORN for years because ACORN's work to raise minimum wages is against the corporate interests of his clients.

    Finally, you claimed my videos "usually distorts stuff," but you give no examples of anything I have distorted.

    I hope that helps clear up your misunderstanding and

    thx 4 the video response :)

  • Don't care who wrote it, the facts are the facts. They have been caught in controversy after controversy after controversy. As to my examples of how you distort my video is an example and my comments on your other videos are more.

  • In addition to the several errors in your video before the 1:16 mark, you really begin to go awry there when you say: "Few people? Are you serious? Did you miss all the news reports on this, mostly by Fox?" In fact, in my video, I specifically mentioned "the warnings about massive voter fraud by ACORN you may have heard on Fox News before the 2008 election" and I gave a link in an annotation and in the video description to a page showing it was a hoax. See tinyurl(.)com/SmearACORN

    MORE:

  • "In fact, in my video, I specifically mentioned "the warnings about massive voter fraud by ACORN you may have heard on Fox News before the 2008 election"

    Yes they WARNED that it could be possible but in the end it didn't happen because the authorities sorted it out. You can't seriously be faulting fox for making a prediction based on the evidence. I think FBI raids in 15 states and hundreds of people arrested counts as possible voter fraud.

  • Voter fraud is not voter registration fraud.

    feeaaaaar monger.

  • Both are still illegal and the second one happened many, many times. Don't try to excuse them by saying well in the end nothing happened so we should just forget the thousands of laws they broke. By the way I say thousands because each faulty name was against the law.

  • Which is why the employees should be prosecuted. Not the organization.

  • When there is that much corruption the company needs to be held accountable and stop participating in these elections until they get their act together because frankly they seem incapable of doing that.

  • "I'm smart enough that I can look at this stuff and can investigate and be like this is how they do it." are you smart enough to distinguish between voter fraud and voter registration fraud? Will you post another video correcting the errors in this video? I rated this one a '1', but I would rate any correction video a '5'.

  • There was no voter fraud, there was voter registration fraud- employees of acorn were defrauding ACORN. There was no conspiracy- these people were lazy and didn't want to work. Acorn fired these people and cooperated with their prosecution.

    "there wasn't any huge voter fraud in the election because they fixed it all", you say. Because if they hadn't fixed it, surely mickey mouse was going to vote.

    Acorn had to hire 13,000 people to go do crap work for crap pay- a couple didn't want to work...

  • you don't have to treate me like that, if you prefer i not comment just say so.

    i think i've proven my point clearly.

  • You've proven nothing. At least the other guy had a link. You have just made assertions and not backed up anything.

  • that means that all of these things you are trying to get us to b elieve about acorn controversies are just accusations.

    acorn has never been caught as an organization doing anything against the law, however it has been accused many times. i do not believe these accusations by you or fox news warrant the conclusion that ACORN is trying to rig elections.

  • "acorn has never been caught as an organization doing anything against the law"

    You keep posting this crap and you will be blocked for your idiocy. The FBI had to raid facilities in 15 states because of voter fraud. That's on the company not "just it's employees". That's bullshit. With that "logic" no company could ever be held responsible just it's "employees". You are retarded so leave my video or I will force you. And you still haven't disproven anything that link had.

  • a good example of the lies being spread by right wing propaganda machines like fox news and being repeated by you here on youtube is in your link.

    one of the controversies you seem to be so sure proves acorn's drive to rig elections is that of mac stuarts. a former employee of acorn who decided to sue acorn based on the fact that he was "paid to collect votes"

    you do not add however that this case was thrown out by its judge due to LACK OF EVIDENCE.

  • there are so many lies spread out in that link that you provided i could not possibly refute them all in 500 characters.

    the biggest misconception you seem to be set on believing is that acorn has somehow been responsible for all these controversies it has been caught in.

    when you make a statement, it would be best to back it with some evidence or at least a reason why you think such a thing.

  • You can post as many times as you want. Just find some and debunk them. The fact that you don't want to debunk any of them shows you can't. I'm just saying.

  • sorry to keep posting comments, but i don't watch msnbc either, fox and msnbc are both corrupt and unacceptable in mainstream media

  • example of fox being biased: before george bush was reelected in 2004 sean hannity leading up to the election was counting down on his show saying "30 days till the reelection of president george bush".

    to me that is unacceptable in main stream news, maybe in a right wing talkshow or something but that can't be said while hiding behind the sub title of "we report you decide". That sounds like deciding for you.

  • "example of fox being biased: before george bush was reelected in 2004 sean hannity leading up to the election was counting down on his show saying "30 days till the reelection of president george bush".

    to me that is unacceptable in main stream news, maybe in a right wing talkshow "

    Technically Hannity is a far-right conservative and that is what his show reflects. Oh and Bush was pretty much guaranteed to win towards the end. obviously he was right.

  • "to me that is unacceptable"

    Oh so you set the journalistic standard. I see. Sean Hannity is not a journalist. Does not claim to be. If he did do this your point would be valid but.......His show is and has always been set as a premise of opinion. He gives his opinion with no apologies, in 2004 Colmes who is a Liberal did the exact same. I know I watch. Do you have a problem with him also? It is the equivalent of an Op Ad piece provide by any paper in circulation.

  • first of all you left out the most important part of what i said, which seems to be a habit with you.

    1) "that can't be said hiding behind the slogan 'we report you decide'" hannity claims to be unbiased in his reports and hannity DOES claim be b ea journalist. you are simply wrong and you must accept that about this particular issue.

    you make yourself look like an idiot because hannity was saying it long before the end of the election, and that election was nowhere NEAR a landslide.

  • "hannity claims to be unbiased in his reports and hannity DOES claim be b ea journalist"

    XD

    You fail right there. I've never heard him say anything like that.

  • you just don't understand man. you can't charge an organization for its employee's corruption. ACORN set up their system with alot of faults. It was a mistake that will not be repeated, but to take that and say that ACORN the organization is the one trying to rig an election is a long shot at best. Fox news was not the only one covering this story, however what they did cover made them the laughing stock of the media.

  • "ACORN set up their system with alot of faults. It was a mistake that will not be repeated"

    Actually they have been caught in many controversies in the past several elections. Standards and rules are terms they don't understand.

  • trust me your wasting you time and when you do prove them wrong they just delete you comment

    like i told him that it dosent matter what acorn wants to do if one of there workers come in with a stack of form that say eat me by law they have to turn all reg. forms in not matter what they say on them

  • Way to go! I have been providing response vids to LV for some time now. Good to have ann ally. Especially because I will be out of touch for a while. Moving, and my computer will be down....keep fighting the haters!

  • I agree with you 100% I'm tired of people who have an agenda and they will distort facts any which way they can to accomplish it. Too many Americans have stopped thinking for themselves.

  • Your a Defender of Fox news or Fixed News?

  • If they don't do anything wrong then why not defend them.

  • Fox news has been cited many times on Misinfromation on every subject, and its not balance at all...

  • And most of those claims about Fox were distorted themselves

  • God forbid CNN is the King..they never ever show bias..not them..not CNBC..oh noo..not ABC

  • they didnt do anything wrong the point is fox has a producer that was arrested for child porn does that mean we should think of everyone at fox as people who watch child porn

    he does stretch it sometimes but like 100 people out of 13000 isnt alot

    and it would be against the law for them not to turn in all the reg forms they get even if they know its bull

    and what fox dosent tell you is mccain and alot of other people in the gop were all for acorn it wasnt a prob. untill they backed obama

  • It was more than a hundred people and even so if facilities in 15 states have to be raided by the FBI then there is seriously something wrong. Also McCain and others stopped backing ACORN when this stuff started to happen.

  • mccain and others stopped backing them then fox starts running it and never mention that many people including john mccain suppoted them

    and you or fox didnt address the fact that they have to turn in all reg. forms even if they know its false it is against the law not to

    and the fact that they raided facilities in 15 states means what, none of the people on the board or office managers whent to jail just people that got paid to walk the street and get names

  • Plenty of people went to jail. And yes they have to turn in the forms but they should have been thrown out immediately. They weren't. Nothing happened until fox shed light on it. You are just like every other liberal hater. You hate Fox so much that you are willing to distort the truth to bash them.

  • dubdub911 wtf are you talking about? Btw Head of the ACLU also caught with child porn, just thought you would like to know. ACORN has been caught in 4 of the last 5 major elections with some form of voters registration fraud. You honestly think that there isn't some sort of any agenda here. Are you really that naive/ fucking stupid? There are many vote register orgs. Why is it only ACORN is caught time and time again with their pants down? Riddle me this.

  • hmm fixed news huh..CNN, and the false reporting of gun laws and automatic weapons this year....

  • Lamarmusizz we are actually having a debate based on facts so go play with your friends. You have no credibility here. I could send you to 1,000's of links were CNN or MSNBC,BBC,PBS has distorted facts. It is called politics and everyone is in it. Fucking douche.

  • fallstoofar-I could send you to 1,000's of links were CNN or MSNBC,BBC,PBS has distorted facts.

    Its not the fact that they distort facts, I'm sure every news Org haven't been a shill, However Fox news never acknowledge there mistakes they just say the "Liberal Media" as the basics of there attacks.. Plus there is video of Fox news and there vile attacks in methods of usage.. I have links also..

  • ..........Ok just as the "Liberal Elite Media" does as well. We could go all day with this. It doesn't get us anywhere. I have never ever once seen CNN or MSNBC retract a DISTORTION of the facts (lets be intellectually honest here, if you can) I challenge you to provide evidence to the contrary and when you can't know you have proved nothing , just gave your opinion which you have a right to. Have fun *wink*.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more