that's an ugly mother-fucker. Look at that face and tell me white people is not the result of interbreeding w/ neanderthals. No other race has people that look like that.
neanderthals lived in Europe and humans went there and encountered them. Science has confirmed w/ DNA evidence that humans did indeed interbreed w/ them.
@Nekronaut321 it's obvious. You just need life experience to realize white people are stupid and clumsy compared to people from the east who are more clever, industrious, dexterous...
For most of human history, Europe is backward compared to the east. They'd like to think their recent advancement is due to their smarts. But it's just due to their violence, which they're better at. They gained a lot from robbing their colonies like burglars gaining from robbing a house, temporarily.
Hello there. I just wanted to say that I've read a lot of your comments over the past few weeks, and it's too bad that people don't see things the way you or I do. But, keep up the good work because people will eventually learn--and you are doing a good job of trying to enlighten people. Thanks.
@ResolutionismTube thanks. its nice to get a positive response instead of the usual responses i get from people who use alex jones' lingo ("NWO shill," "left-wing gatekeeper," "sheeple").
you probably already know of some of these but you should check them out if you don't: Michael Parenti, Howard Zinn, Cornel West, John Perkins and Naomi Klein.
@shwwnn you know the way they hold controll over the other countries? collaborators. they manage to controll the media so they can justify even when they themself go to war. and take the germans as an example. what a exellent working culture. discipline and will. and then east..... religion restraining society.( and the west restraining the east.)...
@Nekronaut321 Germany has the most industrious of the western cultures. But they're lazy compared to the Japanese/Koreans. West controls other countries w/ pure violence. Collaborators know they'll get it if they don't obey US, example is Sadam. Massive military aid is given to collaborators to keep them in power. independent countries are often threatened w/ violence. Example is US surrounding China and Iran w/ military bases, and the verbal threat of violence toward Iran is constant.
To put it nicely, Marr is the biggest pro-power shill in Britian, he gushed over Thatcher and Blair and not even because of their politics, he just loves power.
I'm super glad he he interviewed the antithesis of all that blind love of power.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Chomsky is delusional. It is just like the journalist asked at the beginning, "How are you on this damn program if you are right?" Most of the views get out there. Why doesn't Chomsky go to North Korea if he things we are censoring. I know longer read or listen to Chomsky. He is a crackpot.
@JayGatsbyOdysseus Maybe you should read more Chomsky. First, you would understand what he is talking about. He states that the U.S is not the worst of all nations in the world (in terms of the media). Second, you would learn how to spell and articulate yourself in a manner that is not comparable to a 3 year old.
@palynchuk93 I was in Boston once. A woman that I was seeing wanted to go to a speach by this guy named Chomsky. I agreed. I asked Chomsky a question. I asked why did the Soviet Union fail if socialism is good. Chomsky went into this tangent about how the Soviet Union was not socialism but State-Run Communism. I then said to Chomsky that there is Communism, Socialism, Leninism, and Marxism.Isaidthereisalsodobermanpincher,beagle,poodle,germanshepeard. adogisadog!!!utrysemanticslikechomsky
@JayGatsbyOdysseus If you knew anything about Socialism and basic economic/political philosophy, you would understand that as well. The Soviet Union was not even communism. Marxism incorporates socialism, but it has not been practiced. What you were trying to show was that Capitalism is better because it hasn't failed. That is not true, and you tried to use a bad example of socialism, but you were once again proven wrong. What are you trying to get at? Ithoughtweweretalkingabout themedia.
@palynchuk93 u worri about me spelling and trivial thing like that. i understnad well what chomsky is talkng about he is using ridicule for his own country where he had freedome to talk to the press and he makes money off this but he won't to to live in north korea a country he supposiedly loves n theory but hsi behavior incongruent with his rhetoric so he hypocrite,,,
@palynchuk93 Chomsky loves socialism. North Korea best example of socialism in world. Now, please be like your demi-god hero Chomsky and say, "North Korea is not socialism." A dog is a dog, a poodle, a doberman pincher, a german shepard, a beagle are all dogs. Maxism, Leninsim, Troskyism, Communism is all forms of dogs, socialism. Chomsky says we have censorship here in our press. Well why doesn't he go over to a representation of his ideal and see what kind of censorship they have.
@JayGatsbyOdysseus I will say the North Korea is not socialism. Socialism is an economic theory where the means of production are controlled by the people. The people in North Korea do not own the means of production. They are controlled by the government, and the money made goes straight to the government and not to a redistributing system or towards any sort of social benefit system. How is it socialized at all? For some reason, you are mixing up socialism with authoritarianism.
@JayGatsbyOdysseus He talks about the problems with his country and the media in his own country. That is not a bad thing. It means he has more respect for his country than you will ever have. You obviously do not understand what he talks about. Go listen to somebody geared towards your intelligence like Glen Beck, Bill O'reilly or Barney.
@palynchuk93 Glen Beck is a fucking idiot along with the rest of the Ayn Rand republican idiots. You have followed a intellectual hook and sinker and been indocrinated by his bullshit which he sells to make money. Chomsky is a intellectual capitalist selling socialism. lol And you got suckered in. The idiots that follow the other side dog eat dog cowboy capitalism are fucked up too. I'm threw with you. Don't drink your bath water.
@JayGatsbyOdysseus "You are indoctrinated because this is not what I believe, ergo you are wrong." You are a child. Next time you want to debate somebody, study a little more and do not get someone else to write half of your arguments. Do you think i couldn't distinguish between one of you writing like brain dead fool and the other presenting equally fallacious arguments, though more articulately? Follow my advice or give up (for the sake people's far more important uses of their time).
The thing about Chomsky is if you're even mildly familiar with something he's written you can almost systematically predict his answer to any debater's or interviewer's questions. It really demonstrates how little his critics and interviewers know about him: he's pretty damn' clear about everything he stands for.
you gentiles are Pathetic Always take some jew and make him god or Messiah just like the jesus and kerl marx and know this noam chomsky did you ever wondering why is this all your biggst gods and messiah and your intellectuals from right and left are jewish and you wonder how we the jews call are self the chosen people dont diss this
comment in 100 yreas from know your kids will things that holly histroy just like your Fathers Though't even the arebs belive in a jewish idea of god
it is an amazing that a human being in the position of Marr could possibly be so absurdly dim with almost no capacity of critical thinking. the first question is enough to convince me of this, all the rest simply solidifies my opinion of him
im not so sure it was so much chomsky v marr, any more than you would describe a boxing match between myself and mike tyson as a fair fight. watch the interview, and i use the term loosely, that marr conducted with obama; the only way he could have been any further up his arse was if he'd literally performed a sex act. it was a pathetic and sickening spectacle. marr is a journalistic prostitute, well, i'm not sure about the journalistic part.
Marr got a Judge to issue a court order to ban any other journalisty on publishing an affair he had outside of marriage - Marr is not worthy of interviewing Chomsky!
Marr is a complete automaton. He got destroyed in every single point he brought up. Chomskys ability to see through propaganda and fabrication is unparalleled.
Dr. Chomsky recently told Iranian TV that at the time the US invaded Afghanistan, they had no evidence that al Qaeda had done 9/11. See my video "Chomsky on Faith-Based Wars and 9/11".
7:18 OK so I've watched this interview several times in the last couple years, trying to figure out what Chomsky means by this. I still don't know. "If you believed something different, you wouldn't be sitting where you're sitting." Huh?
@mendali He's saying journalists with dissident views toward the status quo interpretation of news analysis are marginalized and pushed out of the popular media sphere. So if Andrew Marr was on of these dissidents, he wouldn't make it in the journalism biz long enough to have the news media backing needed in order to be a successful journalist who interviews prominent figures and whatnot.
@mendali - Chomsky means if Marr did NOT agree with elite views he would never be a senior BBC journalist. It has evidently never even crossed Marr's mind that the British media might be doing a poor job in representing a diversity of views. Lots of academic research - including Chomsky's - has demonstrated time and time again that the media is NOT 'liberal'. Case in point - all four of the BBC's top economics/business journos did PPE at Oxford... not an active trade unionist among them...
@garyjamesmerrill Exactly, from a crude point of view all Marr knows is he's getting paid, probably handsomely, for doing things the way he has been doing them. Why would he argue with a good thing like that. He can continue travelling the world, eating fine food, enhancing his education, buying the things he wants and leave with a good pension. However, lots of us see - and can't accept.
It always amazes me the way Chomsky can cite every historical fact, every statistic, every academic study he needs to prove his point off the top of his head.
These BBC interviewers are all obviously biased and with hidden motives, their perfidious attempt at cornering these brilliant thoughts leave both parties incredible embarrassed . Obscenely close minded and strictly mainstream right wing thought limit the entire scope of conversation and in a way systematically impose the views the interviewer claims as correct.
@watayapupuya Throughout human history is has been the political, educational and religious authorities who have governed our view of reality, forming in our minds their truth about reality. Question authority and use the sea of information available to inform ourselves about what is really happening around us.
Thought this was funny, from Wikipedia .... was educated in Scotland at the High School of Dundee, Craigflower School and at Loretto, an independent school in Musselburgh, East Lothian. He went on to study English at Trinity Hall, Cambridge. He was once a member of the Socialist Campaign for a Labour Victory. At Cambridge, Marr says he was a "raving leftie", and he acquired the nickname 'Red Andy'."
Chomsky can live anywhere he wants. WHy does he live in US? Why did he take 100,000 from Pentagon while working for MIT? Why does his brother live in multimillion dollar home? WHere does Chomsky donate money because he makes millions (upgrading his fee for speeches post 9/11)? He is a fake and a capitalist. But brainwashed morons don't see it.
@BushidoCode72 I can't see how he's a capitalist. The traditional definition of a capitalist is a person who owns a means of production, like a factory etcetera. In our capitalist structure a owner of a newspaper, a pr-firm etcetera would also be seen as a capitalist.
The fact that Chomsky takes money for speeches doesn't make him less of a socialist. He's not profiting by the labour of others you know.
I don't know where Chomsky donates money, and I doubt you do.
Chomsky is so superior to all his debaters that you always know how the story will end. And it seems that he has a penchant to crash snotty, self-satisfied english journalists like this fellow or that Sackur clown. The only time I saw him in trouble was during his debate with Foucault -partially available on youtube-. For those interested, by the way, there's a book with the full transcription of the Chomsky-Foucault discussion, and I assure you that debates don't get much better than that.
Go to chomsky.info, click the "Debates" tag, then click "Human Nature: Justice versus Power". I wanted to post the full link but it seems it is not allowed to do that. Enjoy it!
It seems like Chomsky hit his button at 7:00 when the reporter snapped lol. It's like telling a child when he grows up that "you know, child, I lied, Santa doesn't exist."
Did Chomsky just completely & POLITELY dissemble this obedient tool in front of his face w/o this idiot even having a clue what's going on? Then he goes on to ask Chomsky how do you know I'm self-centered & is left dumbfounded at such a simple remark.
Capitalism- the wage slavery of immense humanity through the politically manipulated market mechanism for the abstract process of accumulation and concentration of capital in the hands of a few - is an imposition of perpetual war,poverty,exploitation,enviornmental destruction, distortions and deceptions of our true potentials and possibilities. We need to transcend this anti-human system for a world of cooperation for our common well being, A democratic movement of no leaders no followers ....
Do you al see this? Chomsky has pretty much said to the poor journalist;
"You believe something liberal and challenging yes and I'm sure you believe every word of what you're saying, but if you were any more radical you would not be sitting where you are today...."
So much for Marr's notion of challenging and investigative journalism.
@qazw213 well he is following einstein's political beliefs and what-not. in school i was taught about how einstein was the greatest physicist of the 20th century and what-not, which he arguably was, but i was never taught about einstein's political beliefs which were very left wing, anti-authoritarian, and anti-war. i was never taught that einstein was a socialist (an anti-stalin socialist). the education system is completely bullshit
Chomsky would say their names if Marr asked. It isn't intellectual sophistry, it's the way he's used to communicating with people because they aren't familiar with the names and they'll convolute his point.
Anyone who agrees with Chomsky is the "best" at whatever they do; the "best" journalists, "leading" scholars, etc. I never hear anyone else agree with him on that, though
Well, you should follow up on his references, those people he refers to as "leading" or the "best." Two people he refers to frequently are Robert Dahl and Thomas Ferguson. Read their works, they stand out as exceptional and critical scholars.
Yes, Yes, I've read 'Polyarchy,' 'An Introduction To Democratic Theory' and the 'Golden Rule,' but I still think it's questionable whether all the other people Chomsky quotes are the 'best' at whatever they do. Literally every person is referred to as the best, and in this case he doesn't even mention their names.
I read as much of Golden Rule as possible, it was thick. I agree with you, he doesn't mention their names but do you believe he's protecting their identity or trying to corner Marr? He may not mention names but I don't think it in any way invalidates his argument. Also, how do you feel about Chomsky's interpretation of Polyarchy vs. Dahl's actual description of it in his book? I don't think they're the same.
I don't blame you on the Golden Rule, half of this stuff I've had to treat as required study just to finish it (even though it's supposed to be my leisurely reading LOL). Absorbing as much of it as possible is worth the work in the end. Regarding Polyarchy, Chomsky characterizes it differently than the original author. I don't want to see like a hater, because I've learned a lot from Chomsky. But no one is infallible. Chomsky is just too smart to let anyone see where he is very probably wrong.
When it comes to "best journalists", I am sure he refers to people like John Fisk, who really has written history. Fisk for example regards the western media as a shame.
No way would 100% of a 'free press' be willing to say US attacked Vietnam, nor that they massacred in Iraq for oil and strategic advantage. Too many people are hooked up on the ol' godly law about not killing people, esp for personal benefit. So, via the press, we spread a (barely) plausible cover story, for moral comfort and as a code by which to dicsuss empirical skullduggery.
I know this 'journalist' very well. He is of course a Brit and he is self serving and smug in his certitude like so many BBC journo's. Noam nails this boy and he nails him good but I have to tell you all that this guy is still doing his 'reporting' decades after this interview should have buried him.
i personally agree with everything Chomsky says... but that doesnt take away from the fact that Marr is the best journalist the BBC has had in living memory.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Many are better than Marr. Andrew Neil, Jeremy Paxman, Peter Sissons, John Sergeant. And Chomsky, in the words of the great Joan Rivers, ''Is a shit.'' An anarchist is a moron. Anarchism is a gift to the rich. It is the rich who can afford private armies, can afford to buy up all the land and keep the poor subjugated. Capitalism on the other hand gives freedom to billions to pursue their own goals.
Get a clue on the fundamental principles of social-libertarianism. The anarchist system Chomsky proposes wouldn't have anything to do with the things you just described. I suggest you read some documentation about anarchist Catalonia during the Spanish Civil war. Cause that's as close as it gets to Chomsky's view of anarchism.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
He's a closet capitalist pure and simple. Anarchism is a right wing ideology, not a left wing ideology. I have no problem with capitalism. I have a problem with capitalists posing as socialists. This man has criticised intellectual property rights, yet you have to pay to download his speeches. This man criticises trust funds and such, but has set up one for his daughter. A hypocrite is not intelligent. He's just a hypocrite.
You have no clue what you're talking about... why the confidence? I find that humorous.
Anarchism, just like libertarianism, has always had an innate socialist (left wing) connotation. Only in the US are these terms misconceived to such an extent.
Literally 90%+ of his speeches are available for free. Others just haven't been circulated, though this has nothing to do with Chomsky.
He gives innumerable talks for free, and is booked years in advance. Yes, how capitalistic... Chomsly = virtue
Chomsky is so right about the educational system,in college I raise many left of left questions in economics and I was always dismissed, i would love to sue my college for breach of contract, i am rereading the text and the propaganda it them is incredible
Same in political science. Economics is horrible! My senior thesis in undergrad was on Hugo Chavez. I received honors on that thesis. Then I came to grad school, and everyone believe US propaganda about Chavez. Everyone, except the realists, who are more like war criminals, accepts that the US policy is genuinely well-intentioned. It's all poppycock!
Thanks for your comment West. I have been reading french economics textbooks to relearn somethings because I want to go to grad school. However, to a lesser extent, I am experiencing the same Neoliberal dogma. For example, wages for the average American have been dropping for 20 or 30 years now and the french textbook blamed it on "supply and demand", not the real cause Neoliberalism. I am so proud of the people in Central and South America for taking their stance against Neoliberalism.
I've never seen this interview before, it's awesome.
Thank you Noam Chomsky, and thank you elstonieo for uploading this.
ResolutionismTube 5 days ago
thanks for uploading
DeweyZinnChomskyFisk 2 weeks ago
Chomsky is handsome tho.
shwwnn 1 month ago
that's an ugly mother-fucker. Look at that face and tell me white people is not the result of interbreeding w/ neanderthals. No other race has people that look like that.
neanderthals lived in Europe and humans went there and encountered them. Science has confirmed w/ DNA evidence that humans did indeed interbreed w/ them.
shwwnn 1 month ago
@shwwnn so? hes smarter than you... gotta hurt.
Nekronaut321 1 month ago
@Nekronaut321 No, he's dumber. So are most white people. proves my point.
shwwnn 1 month ago
@shwwnn nice proof.. argument please?
Nekronaut321 1 month ago
@Nekronaut321 it's obvious. You just need life experience to realize white people are stupid and clumsy compared to people from the east who are more clever, industrious, dexterous...
For most of human history, Europe is backward compared to the east. They'd like to think their recent advancement is due to their smarts. But it's just due to their violence, which they're better at. They gained a lot from robbing their colonies like burglars gaining from robbing a house, temporarily.
shwwnn 1 month ago
@shwwnn Seems like you're really insecure about the superiority of the white race, rice farmer.
Incognitoification1 1 month ago
@Incognitoification1 seems like you are really blind to the superiority of the eastern race, bitch!
shwwnn 4 weeks ago
@shwwnn ignorant racism...
DeweyZinnChomskyFisk 2 weeks ago
@DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Indeed.
Incognitoification1 2 weeks ago
@Incognitoification1 indeed what? he's talking about you too moron, oh, and ignorant racist
shwwnn 1 week ago
@DeweyZinnChomskyFisk no, informed racism.
shwwnn 1 week ago
@shwwnn pathetic racist...
DeweyZinnChomskyFisk 1 week ago
@DeweyZinnChomskyFisk
Hello there. I just wanted to say that I've read a lot of your comments over the past few weeks, and it's too bad that people don't see things the way you or I do. But, keep up the good work because people will eventually learn--and you are doing a good job of trying to enlighten people. Thanks.
ResolutionismTube 5 days ago
@ResolutionismTube thanks. its nice to get a positive response instead of the usual responses i get from people who use alex jones' lingo ("NWO shill," "left-wing gatekeeper," "sheeple").
you probably already know of some of these but you should check them out if you don't: Michael Parenti, Howard Zinn, Cornel West, John Perkins and Naomi Klein.
DeweyZinnChomskyFisk 5 days ago
@DeweyZinnChomskyFisk
Thanks, yes I am familiar with all of them, and I am delighted to know that you are as well. :-)
ResolutionismTube 4 days ago
@Incognitoification1 ignorant racism...
DeweyZinnChomskyFisk 2 weeks ago
@shwwnn you know the way they hold controll over the other countries? collaborators. they manage to controll the media so they can justify even when they themself go to war. and take the germans as an example. what a exellent working culture. discipline and will. and then east..... religion restraining society.( and the west restraining the east.)...
Nekronaut321 4 weeks ago
@Nekronaut321 Germany has the most industrious of the western cultures. But they're lazy compared to the Japanese/Koreans. West controls other countries w/ pure violence. Collaborators know they'll get it if they don't obey US, example is Sadam. Massive military aid is given to collaborators to keep them in power. independent countries are often threatened w/ violence. Example is US surrounding China and Iran w/ military bases, and the verbal threat of violence toward Iran is constant.
shwwnn 3 weeks ago
The age of the internet? The age of the superinjunction?
gamerunknown 1 month ago
To put it nicely, Marr is the biggest pro-power shill in Britian, he gushed over Thatcher and Blair and not even because of their politics, he just loves power.
I'm super glad he he interviewed the antithesis of all that blind love of power.
AndroidPolitician 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Chomsky is delusional. It is just like the journalist asked at the beginning, "How are you on this damn program if you are right?" Most of the views get out there. Why doesn't Chomsky go to North Korea if he things we are censoring. I know longer read or listen to Chomsky. He is a crackpot.
JayGatsbyOdysseus 2 months ago
Comment removed
vesemre 2 months ago
@JayGatsbyOdysseus Maybe you should read more Chomsky. First, you would understand what he is talking about. He states that the U.S is not the worst of all nations in the world (in terms of the media). Second, you would learn how to spell and articulate yourself in a manner that is not comparable to a 3 year old.
palynchuk93 1 month ago
@palynchuk93 I was in Boston once. A woman that I was seeing wanted to go to a speach by this guy named Chomsky. I agreed. I asked Chomsky a question. I asked why did the Soviet Union fail if socialism is good. Chomsky went into this tangent about how the Soviet Union was not socialism but State-Run Communism. I then said to Chomsky that there is Communism, Socialism, Leninism, and Marxism.Isaidthereisalsodobermanpincher,beagle,poodle,germanshepeard. adogisadog!!!utrysemanticslikechomsky
JayGatsbyOdysseus 1 month ago
@JayGatsbyOdysseus If you knew anything about Socialism and basic economic/political philosophy, you would understand that as well. The Soviet Union was not even communism. Marxism incorporates socialism, but it has not been practiced. What you were trying to show was that Capitalism is better because it hasn't failed. That is not true, and you tried to use a bad example of socialism, but you were once again proven wrong. What are you trying to get at? Ithoughtweweretalkingabout themedia.
palynchuk93 1 month ago
@palynchuk93 u worri about me spelling and trivial thing like that. i understnad well what chomsky is talkng about he is using ridicule for his own country where he had freedome to talk to the press and he makes money off this but he won't to to live in north korea a country he supposiedly loves n theory but hsi behavior incongruent with his rhetoric so he hypocrite,,,
JayGatsbyOdysseus 1 month ago
@JayGatsbyOdysseus How is North Korea, in an way whatsoever, his ideal state?
palynchuk93 1 month ago
@palynchuk93 Chomsky loves socialism. North Korea best example of socialism in world. Now, please be like your demi-god hero Chomsky and say, "North Korea is not socialism." A dog is a dog, a poodle, a doberman pincher, a german shepard, a beagle are all dogs. Maxism, Leninsim, Troskyism, Communism is all forms of dogs, socialism. Chomsky says we have censorship here in our press. Well why doesn't he go over to a representation of his ideal and see what kind of censorship they have.
JayGatsbyOdysseus 1 month ago
@JayGatsbyOdysseus I will say the North Korea is not socialism. Socialism is an economic theory where the means of production are controlled by the people. The people in North Korea do not own the means of production. They are controlled by the government, and the money made goes straight to the government and not to a redistributing system or towards any sort of social benefit system. How is it socialized at all? For some reason, you are mixing up socialism with authoritarianism.
palynchuk93 1 month ago
@JayGatsbyOdysseus He talks about the problems with his country and the media in his own country. That is not a bad thing. It means he has more respect for his country than you will ever have. You obviously do not understand what he talks about. Go listen to somebody geared towards your intelligence like Glen Beck, Bill O'reilly or Barney.
palynchuk93 1 month ago
@palynchuk93 Glen Beck is a fucking idiot along with the rest of the Ayn Rand republican idiots. You have followed a intellectual hook and sinker and been indocrinated by his bullshit which he sells to make money. Chomsky is a intellectual capitalist selling socialism. lol And you got suckered in. The idiots that follow the other side dog eat dog cowboy capitalism are fucked up too. I'm threw with you. Don't drink your bath water.
JayGatsbyOdysseus 1 month ago
@JayGatsbyOdysseus "You are indoctrinated because this is not what I believe, ergo you are wrong." You are a child. Next time you want to debate somebody, study a little more and do not get someone else to write half of your arguments. Do you think i couldn't distinguish between one of you writing like brain dead fool and the other presenting equally fallacious arguments, though more articulately? Follow my advice or give up (for the sake people's far more important uses of their time).
palynchuk93 1 month ago
The title is hilarious. Bush truly was a tool, wasn't he?
SoberHedgehog 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The thing about Chomsky is if you're even mildly familiar with something he's written you can almost systematically predict his answer to any debater's or interviewer's questions. It really demonstrates how little his critics and interviewers know about him: he's pretty damn' clear about everything he stands for.
KilVall 2 months ago
Comment removed
KilVall 2 months ago
NEVER IMAGINED that one???!!!
heatherturner34123 2 months ago
ha. "what about this program?" pretty self deluded.
jredbar 2 months ago
Chomsky looks cool in this video. I wish I had his good looks.
MichaelStepkoff 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chomsky: the only man who can write a 200 page book on terrorism without once mentioning Islam !
He is a Jew who hates himself for being a Jew - cf.Soros
vonkleve 5 months ago
Chomsky = truth
MegaLotusEater 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you gentiles are Pathetic Always take some jew and make him god or Messiah just like the jesus and kerl marx and know this noam chomsky did you ever wondering why is this all your biggst gods and messiah and your intellectuals from right and left are jewish and you wonder how we the jews call are self the chosen people dont diss this
comment in 100 yreas from know your kids will things that holly histroy just like your Fathers Though't even the arebs belive in a jewish idea of god
ehudnold9 5 months ago
Explaining what the propaganda model is to Andrew Marr is like explaining what water is to a fish.
fiveredpears 6 months ago 20
The US did not INVADE South Vietnam. We were called in by the South Vietnamese to fight their war for them.
TheLoyalOfficer 6 months ago
@TheLoyalOfficer Just like we were called in by the Iraqis to liberate them, right?
ladormilona 6 months ago 2
@ladormilona Two totally different situations.
TheLoyalOfficer 6 months ago
"I'm sure you believe everything you're saying, but if you believed something differently, you wouldn't be here."
Chomsky's bad ass.
Bremerxxxx 6 months ago 32
Marr can't grasp what chomsky is telling him. He's not self censoring, he's not capable of forming a dissident thought.
fiveredpears 6 months ago
@KnwThyslf .no you wouldnt.Your jsut a pussy on the internet acting hard and what not.
laudrup90 7 months ago
it is an amazing that a human being in the position of Marr could possibly be so absurdly dim with almost no capacity of critical thinking. the first question is enough to convince me of this, all the rest simply solidifies my opinion of him
slovakmath 7 months ago
Great interview, even if the reporter disagrees with Chomsky he respects him, more than you can say for some others
FootDanielLight 7 months ago
Comment removed
RobertHartlepool 8 months ago
im not so sure it was so much chomsky v marr, any more than you would describe a boxing match between myself and mike tyson as a fair fight. watch the interview, and i use the term loosely, that marr conducted with obama; the only way he could have been any further up his arse was if he'd literally performed a sex act. it was a pathetic and sickening spectacle. marr is a journalistic prostitute, well, i'm not sure about the journalistic part.
fullspeccydominance 8 months ago 2
Andrew is a fantastic example of Chomsky's model - he has swallowed it all, hook, line and sinker ...
ropelee 8 months ago 3
7:10 "How can you know that I am self censoring?"
Marr got a Judge to issue a court order to ban any other journalisty on publishing an affair he had outside of marriage - Marr is not worthy of interviewing Chomsky!
jagara1 8 months ago
Marr is a complete automaton. He got destroyed in every single point he brought up. Chomskys ability to see through propaganda and fabrication is unparalleled.
RasmusU 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dr. Chomsky recently told Iranian TV that at the time the US invaded Afghanistan, they had no evidence that al Qaeda had done 9/11. See my video "Chomsky on Faith-Based Wars and 9/11".
punxsutawneybarney 9 months ago
Here Chomsky is agreeing with Foucault, for those who have seen his debate with Michel Foucault. I love both of them.
Frutoses 10 months ago
7:18 OK so I've watched this interview several times in the last couple years, trying to figure out what Chomsky means by this. I still don't know. "If you believed something different, you wouldn't be sitting where you're sitting." Huh?
mendali 10 months ago
@mendali He's saying journalists with dissident views toward the status quo interpretation of news analysis are marginalized and pushed out of the popular media sphere. So if Andrew Marr was on of these dissidents, he wouldn't make it in the journalism biz long enough to have the news media backing needed in order to be a successful journalist who interviews prominent figures and whatnot.
Dbmwjo 10 months ago
@mendali Like he said previously: people who think differently are discarded and undesirable.
desu76 10 months ago
@mendali - Chomsky means if Marr did NOT agree with elite views he would never be a senior BBC journalist. It has evidently never even crossed Marr's mind that the British media might be doing a poor job in representing a diversity of views. Lots of academic research - including Chomsky's - has demonstrated time and time again that the media is NOT 'liberal'. Case in point - all four of the BBC's top economics/business journos did PPE at Oxford... not an active trade unionist among them...
garyjamesmerrill 10 months ago
@garyjamesmerrill Exactly, from a crude point of view all Marr knows is he's getting paid, probably handsomely, for doing things the way he has been doing them. Why would he argue with a good thing like that. He can continue travelling the world, eating fine food, enhancing his education, buying the things he wants and leave with a good pension. However, lots of us see - and can't accept.
johnmacward 9 months ago
@mendali What the Hell is it that you cannot understand ?
How much simpler could it be stated?
Try to think just a little bit.
watayapupuya 8 months ago
@watayapupuya Oh come on, there's no need to be so impatient with a stranger on the internet. And you didn't even answer my question! Sheesh.
mendali 8 months ago
It always amazes me the way Chomsky can cite every historical fact, every statistic, every academic study he needs to prove his point off the top of his head.
WastedTourist 10 months ago
These BBC interviewers are all obviously biased and with hidden motives, their perfidious attempt at cornering these brilliant thoughts leave both parties incredible embarrassed . Obscenely close minded and strictly mainstream right wing thought limit the entire scope of conversation and in a way systematically impose the views the interviewer claims as correct.
VowOneWisdom 11 months ago
@VowOneWisdom
Just imagine:Millions of Americans get everything they know from " FOX NEWS" !!!!!!!!!!!
(also abc,msnbc,cnn,etc. are close behind)
watayapupuya 8 months ago
@watayapupuya Throughout human history is has been the political, educational and religious authorities who have governed our view of reality, forming in our minds their truth about reality. Question authority and use the sea of information available to inform ourselves about what is really happening around us.
VowOneWisdom 8 months ago
schooled!
thailegend 11 months ago
stick to linguistics, you saddle-goose
brancron 1 year ago
I like when he grows his hair out.
thesleevelesstease 1 year ago
Thought this was funny, from Wikipedia .... was educated in Scotland at the High School of Dundee, Craigflower School and at Loretto, an independent school in Musselburgh, East Lothian. He went on to study English at Trinity Hall, Cambridge. He was once a member of the Socialist Campaign for a Labour Victory. At Cambridge, Marr says he was a "raving leftie", and he acquired the nickname 'Red Andy'."
DJSpinoza 1 year ago
Chomsky can live anywhere he wants. WHy does he live in US? Why did he take 100,000 from Pentagon while working for MIT? Why does his brother live in multimillion dollar home? WHere does Chomsky donate money because he makes millions (upgrading his fee for speeches post 9/11)? He is a fake and a capitalist. But brainwashed morons don't see it.
BushidoCode72 1 year ago
@BushidoCode72 go on...
I'm certain you have evidence for all of this?
thesleevelesstease 1 year ago
@BushidoCode72
Because he is an american and was born here. This is his country as well.
He took money from MIT in order to make a living.
What his brother owns is irrelevant.
Im not sure where he donates his money.
marx102 1 year ago
@BushidoCode72 I can't see how he's a capitalist. The traditional definition of a capitalist is a person who owns a means of production, like a factory etcetera. In our capitalist structure a owner of a newspaper, a pr-firm etcetera would also be seen as a capitalist.
The fact that Chomsky takes money for speeches doesn't make him less of a socialist. He's not profiting by the labour of others you know.
I don't know where Chomsky donates money, and I doubt you do.
CrustVegan 1 year ago
what they call propaganda in communism becomes public relations in capitalism.
solidarity2205 1 year ago
Chomsky ftw, ive never heard a word out of his mouth that didnt humble me......
Dymdez 1 year ago
chomsky is badass
freakespionage 1 year ago
Marr goes to school..
Scriptavolant 1 year ago 28
Chomsky is so superior to all his debaters that you always know how the story will end. And it seems that he has a penchant to crash snotty, self-satisfied english journalists like this fellow or that Sackur clown. The only time I saw him in trouble was during his debate with Foucault -partially available on youtube-. For those interested, by the way, there's a book with the full transcription of the Chomsky-Foucault discussion, and I assure you that debates don't get much better than that.
kiasmus 1 year ago 3
@kiasmus Thanks for this, do you have a full reference for the text in question?
DJSpinoza 1 year ago
Go to chomsky.info, click the "Debates" tag, then click "Human Nature: Justice versus Power". I wanted to post the full link but it seems it is not allowed to do that. Enjoy it!
kiasmus 1 year ago
@kiasmus Thank you!
DJSpinoza 1 year ago
Comment removed
langengro 1 year ago
Is this a BBC production? Or, is it Marr's production company supplying it to the BBC?
whereismybailouttv 1 year ago
It's amazing, Chomsky's words contain so much power and yet he speaks so softly.
yingleberry 1 year ago 3
He should have said to Marr: 'You're a moron and I'll tell you why. In fact, I'll even give you references...'
fgjk234 1 year ago 6
@fgjk234 lol man, nice
smilingasteroid 1 year ago
chomsky pwnin noobs
AdamDLDixon 1 year ago 5
Marr just doesnt get it.
GOLUCKY222 1 year ago
It seems like Chomsky hit his button at 7:00 when the reporter snapped lol. It's like telling a child when he grows up that "you know, child, I lied, Santa doesn't exist."
andyx1205 1 year ago
Did Chomsky just completely & POLITELY dissemble this obedient tool in front of his face w/o this idiot even having a clue what's going on? Then he goes on to ask Chomsky how do you know I'm self-centered & is left dumbfounded at such a simple remark.
GothemcityX 1 year ago
7:19
Wow. Look at Marr open his mouth to respond, then quickly change gears.
henrythesteinberg 1 year ago
Good catch!
That momentary pause there with an open mouth... :O
NartSaga 1 year ago
Capitalism- the wage slavery of immense humanity through the politically manipulated market mechanism for the abstract process of accumulation and concentration of capital in the hands of a few - is an imposition of perpetual war,poverty,exploitation,enviornmental destruction, distortions and deceptions of our true potentials and possibilities. We need to transcend this anti-human system for a world of cooperation for our common well being, A democratic movement of no leaders no followers ....
arzoyan 2 years ago 5
what an intense intellectual dual!
clownfeet246 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's worring that so many clever people fall for Noam's slight of hands.
Sid8800 2 years ago
Do you al see this? Chomsky has pretty much said to the poor journalist;
"You believe something liberal and challenging yes and I'm sure you believe every word of what you're saying, but if you were any more radical you would not be sitting where you are today...."
So much for Marr's notion of challenging and investigative journalism.
But it does stand to rationale
sponsoredwalk1 2 years ago 3
I havent seen this video. Thank you for the upload!
TheLeftLibertarian 2 years ago
9:50 PWNage
wojtek0000 2 years ago
The man seemed to look like Einstein!
qazw213 2 years ago 3
@qazw213 well he is following einstein's political beliefs and what-not. in school i was taught about how einstein was the greatest physicist of the 20th century and what-not, which he arguably was, but i was never taught about einstein's political beliefs which were very left wing, anti-authoritarian, and anti-war. i was never taught that einstein was a socialist (an anti-stalin socialist). the education system is completely bullshit
andyx1205 1 year ago 3
Chomsky would say their names if Marr asked. It isn't intellectual sophistry, it's the way he's used to communicating with people because they aren't familiar with the names and they'll convolute his point.
mdoob11 2 years ago
go sohpistrize yourself
bullbunnies 2 years ago
Anyone who agrees with Chomsky is the "best" at whatever they do; the "best" journalists, "leading" scholars, etc. I never hear anyone else agree with him on that, though
nigerlover18 2 years ago
Well, you should follow up on his references, those people he refers to as "leading" or the "best." Two people he refers to frequently are Robert Dahl and Thomas Ferguson. Read their works, they stand out as exceptional and critical scholars.
PatrickWJ 2 years ago 3
Yes, Yes, I've read 'Polyarchy,' 'An Introduction To Democratic Theory' and the 'Golden Rule,' but I still think it's questionable whether all the other people Chomsky quotes are the 'best' at whatever they do. Literally every person is referred to as the best, and in this case he doesn't even mention their names.
nigerlover18 2 years ago
I read as much of Golden Rule as possible, it was thick. I agree with you, he doesn't mention their names but do you believe he's protecting their identity or trying to corner Marr? He may not mention names but I don't think it in any way invalidates his argument. Also, how do you feel about Chomsky's interpretation of Polyarchy vs. Dahl's actual description of it in his book? I don't think they're the same.
PatrickWJ 2 years ago
I don't blame you on the Golden Rule, half of this stuff I've had to treat as required study just to finish it (even though it's supposed to be my leisurely reading LOL). Absorbing as much of it as possible is worth the work in the end. Regarding Polyarchy, Chomsky characterizes it differently than the original author. I don't want to see like a hater, because I've learned a lot from Chomsky. But no one is infallible. Chomsky is just too smart to let anyone see where he is very probably wrong.
nigerlover18 2 years ago
...and Robert Fisk. He is definatly one of the best and the quote "western media is a shame" is probably of him.
Staubdumm 2 years ago
Robert is the best!
jhille85 2 years ago
When it comes to "best journalists", I am sure he refers to people like John Fisk, who really has written history. Fisk for example regards the western media as a shame.
Staubdumm 2 years ago 3
The sound levels are way to low, elstonieo. And that's a pity, since it is very important what is being said.
CaptainBluebear08 2 years ago
Marr: So you're calling me a little dickhead then?
Chomsky: I ,er....
wungabunga 2 years ago
love ya noam.
donkey69donkey69 2 years ago 3
Poor Mr. Marr. He just dosen't seem to get it.
BeholdZeus 2 years ago 4
capitalism does give freedom to millions! millions out of billions.
gratex 2 years ago 6
7:10
lol
Chomsky turned ON every single neuron in Marr's brain.
lol
Energyium 2 years ago 6
he did the best thing he could do...change the subject
PatrickWJ 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
Energyium 2 years ago
propaganda is to a democracy as violence is to a dictatorship
hikupoopoo 2 years ago 54
@hikupoopoo
@Marly61
@solidarity2205
@fgjk234
@Dymdez
@freakespionage
@Scriptavolant
@smilingasteroid
Check it:
ww w. an archa dia. c om
StarfishBingo 1 year ago
educate-yourself org/cn/noamchomskygatekepper26sep05 shtml
josephstra 2 years ago
In a way Marr himself proves Chomsky's point.
Marr would adamantly insist that he is not self-censoring as a journalist.
He also almost ridicules Chomsky's position, implying that he's a conspiracy theorist, when he obviously is not.
Marr just happens to be someone who would ultimately defend the US/UCK
position in the "war", or at least be moderately sympathetic to it.
So he has to disagree with Chomsky, and deprecate him editorially otherwise it would imply he was a victim of propaganda.
nickyfann 3 years ago 5
Marr is a perfect example of the type of spineless purveyor of manufactured consent within the media that Chomsky discusses;
If you can't be a shining example be a terrible warning!
To be fair he's no worse than most of the turds who front the BBc's propoblanda
"News" output.
DFORCE1969 3 years ago 3
@DFORCE1969 If the BBC is fronted by turds, goodness gracious, what, then, is the US media fronted by?
fctchk 1 year ago
Amazing memory for somebody who is 79 years old.
adeadlysniper 3 years ago 9
No way would 100% of a 'free press' be willing to say US attacked Vietnam, nor that they massacred in Iraq for oil and strategic advantage. Too many people are hooked up on the ol' godly law about not killing people, esp for personal benefit. So, via the press, we spread a (barely) plausible cover story, for moral comfort and as a code by which to dicsuss empirical skullduggery.
sxmadrid 3 years ago
I know this 'journalist' very well. He is of course a Brit and he is self serving and smug in his certitude like so many BBC journo's. Noam nails this boy and he nails him good but I have to tell you all that this guy is still doing his 'reporting' decades after this interview should have buried him.
Quietlydoesit 3 years ago 2
andrew marr's the best reporter working in the UK mainstream media
ChocolateExplosion 3 years ago
That doesn't say much for the UK's mainstream media. Didn't you see the report Marr did for the BBC praising Tony Blair for the Iraq war?
NathanZackery 3 years ago
i personally agree with everything Chomsky says... but that doesnt take away from the fact that Marr is the best journalist the BBC has had in living memory.
ChocolateExplosion 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Many are better than Marr. Andrew Neil, Jeremy Paxman, Peter Sissons, John Sergeant. And Chomsky, in the words of the great Joan Rivers, ''Is a shit.'' An anarchist is a moron. Anarchism is a gift to the rich. It is the rich who can afford private armies, can afford to buy up all the land and keep the poor subjugated. Capitalism on the other hand gives freedom to billions to pursue their own goals.
dragonlee90 3 years ago
andrew neil???? what? he's the biggest joke going.
ChocolateExplosion 3 years ago 4
Andrew Neil is made to look soft and cuddly now, but he wasn't aloud on Newsnight because he was too tough.
dragonlee90 3 years ago
the guy's a total muppet.
ChocolateExplosion 3 years ago
I like Marr, but tbh I think Andrew Neil would have handled this interview better than Marr.
Laivasse 3 years ago
Get a clue on the fundamental principles of social-libertarianism. The anarchist system Chomsky proposes wouldn't have anything to do with the things you just described. I suggest you read some documentation about anarchist Catalonia during the Spanish Civil war. Cause that's as close as it gets to Chomsky's view of anarchism.
Cosbibi 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He's a closet capitalist pure and simple. Anarchism is a right wing ideology, not a left wing ideology. I have no problem with capitalism. I have a problem with capitalists posing as socialists. This man has criticised intellectual property rights, yet you have to pay to download his speeches. This man criticises trust funds and such, but has set up one for his daughter. A hypocrite is not intelligent. He's just a hypocrite.
dragonlee90 3 years ago
The fuck do you want him to do? Live on a mountain in Peru in his own anarchistic world. That doesn't seem very productive.
Cosbibi 3 years ago
You have no clue what you're talking about... why the confidence? I find that humorous.
Anarchism, just like libertarianism, has always had an innate socialist (left wing) connotation. Only in the US are these terms misconceived to such an extent.
Literally 90%+ of his speeches are available for free. Others just haven't been circulated, though this has nothing to do with Chomsky.
He gives innumerable talks for free, and is booked years in advance. Yes, how capitalistic... Chomsly = virtue
mdoob11 2 years ago 5
It's a worrying fact if it's true.
sxmadrid 3 years ago
Chomsky is so right about the educational system,in college I raise many left of left questions in economics and I was always dismissed, i would love to sue my college for breach of contract, i am rereading the text and the propaganda it them is incredible
Marly61 4 years ago 30
Same in political science. Economics is horrible! My senior thesis in undergrad was on Hugo Chavez. I received honors on that thesis. Then I came to grad school, and everyone believe US propaganda about Chavez. Everyone, except the realists, who are more like war criminals, accepts that the US policy is genuinely well-intentioned. It's all poppycock!
westphalianprinz 4 years ago 3
Thanks for your comment West. I have been reading french economics textbooks to relearn somethings because I want to go to grad school. However, to a lesser extent, I am experiencing the same Neoliberal dogma. For example, wages for the average American have been dropping for 20 or 30 years now and the french textbook blamed it on "supply and demand", not the real cause Neoliberalism. I am so proud of the people in Central and South America for taking their stance against Neoliberalism.
Marly61 4 years ago 2
I recommend you listen to Chavez' bloviations in the original spanish. The buffoonery entertains the content saddens.
fctchk 2 years ago