damn 9000ft MSL? i dont blame the pilot lol at that altitude the plane would be handling completely differently than it would at sea level... unless he was used to flying it at 9000 lol then idk
He needed enough speed for a "flair". 10 knots faster, he would have lifted his nose, and touched down on the "mains". He had plenty of runway to do this.
after cleared the obstacle pilot fail to mantain an controlled descend rate,never the less he should add an burts of power few feet above the ground in order to level off and flare. i know its easy to say.
If pilot recognized excessive sink, he should have blipped the throttle until in ground effect and rounded that sucker out into a nice flare and perfect touchdown...oops.
@svinu121 he lost too much air speed, then the plane just fell out of the sky, when you land with the motor off like that, you need to come in and land not try to hang in the air so long..
@nighthawk0077 to me it looks like the trees blocking the head wind was what caused him to fall out of the sky they need to cut down more trees around that air strip
if it is 9000 ft msl, performance would be less, lift component would be less. you came high and fast maybe on idle expecting lift component as you level and flare, but at 9000 msl it wouldnt be likely so. anyway you walked away that whats important mate.
Following a prop strike and undercarriage damage, it'd have been more prudent of the pilot to shut down the engine at the earliest opportunity and NOT taxi along the strip. This is a good instructional video of what not to do whilst landing (high alpha, insufficient airspeed) and what not to do after an accident!
The camera location and angle make it a bit difficult to get the full effect. Doesn't look all that bad to me, you handled it well. at what point did you think you may "smite" the Earth? lol
Did you build it, or was it "ready to fly"? Was this shot in Columbia, or?
Sounds like it may be a Rotax, is it? Thanks for posting.
@kitmm, bang on, mate, he should have noticed how much elevator he was having to hold in on the approach and watched his airspeed more carefully. Generally, a 'natural' pilot knows from his control response how much authourity he has left and he really should have increased his power and airspeed to take into account the elevation of the airstrip. Good job nobody was hurt and he probably learned a lot from this, if he didn't, he should quit flying and be thankfull he's alive!
Please be honest. This airplane is NOT a Zenith CH701 ! Could this airplane be a Savanna, perhaps?
The truth is, that this is a very bad, unauthorized copy of a very fine STOL airplane. I am not surprised that you got into trouble with this airplane. I am glad that you were not hurt.
Please be honest and admit that this is NOT A CH701.
Please remove the ch701 tag from this video. Thank you.
(1) thats sucks, but happens (2) if you dont have wings, don't make fun! Do you think the pilot or his family thought this was "funny"? (3) details? how was the engine/gear box after prop strike? (4) THANKS for the video...without these, REAL pilots like myself would not be able to learn from others mistakes! stuff like this just happens sometimes, It takes a humble (& courageous) person to "advertise" thier errors in the hopes that others may learn!
9000ft AMSL would mean GS of 100kts. The pilot looked a little hasty, and I'm guessing he had wind sheer and curl-over from those trees. Though it is easy to comment when you're not there!
why are you relating a particular altitude to GS? To the best of my knowledge, which is pretty good, the only thing that affects GS is wind, I don't see why 9000 ft means 100 kts. Just wondering, might save my life some day.
Re:The "more info" box said the airfield is 9000ft AMSL.
What I should of said: IAS of 75-ish kts would result in a ground speed around 100 kts at that altitude; with that speed and the thin air plus other factors such as wind sheer, there is an increased chance of a crash, hence....
Umm. It's called density altitude and affects the way the pitot-static systems in the airplane interpret air data. The higher you are, the slower the airplane thinks its going because the air is less dense.
Prop strike - 26 seconds in, spit second later the sound of the prop catches up with the video. Overhaul the engine, check the engine mounts and hope to god there isnt much damage. the overhaul for that engine because of the strike isnt going to be cheap.
It looks like he tried to land to quickly. Hard to tell the surface from the vid but surely he could have kept up more speed and just gently touched down later on. But then I can't see what the runway was exactly like.
Remember, the air at higher altitudes is thinner and it could've been a high density-altitude day, making things worse. It happens, at least the plane was repairable.
He bent the gear !!! If you look carefully, the right gear is bent, and the plane is listing to the right. Also, it sounds like he nicked the prop on the ground, there is a slight delay due to the distance, but when he bounced I heard the prop blades hitting. To bad, he had LOTS of room to spare, there was no need to be flying final that slow. He stopped in 1/3 the runway, but he damaged his plane doing it...
why so slow in final: plane was stalling immediately when levelling out near ground, it dropped 2m in stall to the ground. If you get hit by a thermal in final...
damn 9000ft MSL? i dont blame the pilot lol at that altitude the plane would be handling completely differently than it would at sea level... unless he was used to flying it at 9000 lol then idk
DiamondPilotDan 5 days ago
must b a drug run lol fuck you guys
sertox12345 2 weeks ago
So ended the legacy of Ecuador Airlines.
CaptainAndreas45 3 weeks ago
She's gonna chrash! Full throttle, dammit!
ilwakobon 1 month ago
Need to flare and stall. He had a great deal of runway for that. Were the flaps down -- difficult to see.
otissumnerbrown 3 months ago
well, any landing you drive away from is a good one, and we see here another reason to chose the tricycle landing gear model over a tail dragger.
Bravo21 3 months ago
Basically was a crash...
sashman3988 4 months ago
Must be one of those naval aviators!
KATAERO1 5 months ago
He saw the ground coming at him really fast and got scared, pulling back on the controls as an instinct of fear.
chair5432 5 months ago
stabilized apprch lol
chair5432 5 months ago
Everyones an expert!
jonny96 5 months ago
The flare was too high, he had to wait few seconds to make the flare.
Chieio 6 months ago
i bet the pilot shit his or her pants
waynetaylor66 6 months ago
Why man invented spring steel landing gear...
HeRacesTheSun 7 months ago
LG gonna need a checkup.
cashpoboy 7 months ago
I'm not going to say a thing.
chestybondrod 7 months ago
wow rough landing
RCAFlyboy 8 months ago
He needed enough speed for a "flair". 10 knots faster, he would have lifted his nose, and touched down on the "mains". He had plenty of runway to do this.
otissumnerbrown 8 months ago
Maybe he dropped in a wake? Just guessing from the surrounding forest...
aviatorsbh 8 months ago
No matter what he did, it was one hell of a short landing.
MrRabit1993 8 months ago
At 0:45 i thought the wheels had come off
GrapefruitSalad97 8 months ago
after cleared the obstacle pilot fail to mantain an controlled descend rate,never the less he should add an burts of power few feet above the ground in order to level off and flare. i know its easy to say.
saludos
stealhty1 8 months ago
lol it's not so bad...
billkolias 10 months ago
If pilot recognized excessive sink, he should have blipped the throttle until in ground effect and rounded that sucker out into a nice flare and perfect touchdown...oops.
justsnappy 10 months ago 2
LIKEEEE A GLOVE! lmao
omarhr1 10 months ago
9000ft amsl**
Ricmcspeedy987 10 months ago
yes
santymar 10 months ago
@Ricmcspeedy987 9000ft msl would do fine..
DiamondPilotDan 5 days ago
WILL YOU PLEASE STE POFF THE GRASS !!!!!!!
vincent7520 11 months ago
I hope he takes a good look at that prop because it did hit
serger2010 11 months ago
it was just more of a short field than a soft
roofy2k 11 months ago
congrats.. you just didnt borned to be a pilot - go look for another job
GameNewbie 11 months ago
well that was a smooth landing ;)
Manx1632 1 year ago
I think he had no speed left to flare. It just stopped flying (stalled) from too high.
winterka100 1 year ago
Omg, if dat plane crashed, u wouldve messed up da whole site :x
ClementeProductions 1 year ago
I think he bent the forward strut..... he flared way too soon.
urgdaddy 1 year ago
If you could get out of the plane walking with you own legs it was a good land!
tensoares 1 year ago
@tensoares No
Sturms 1 year ago
Hope you could have repaired the damage with not too much cost .
explorateurdesairs 1 year ago
you level off too early and should give an burst of power in this case, well hope lesson is learned here
stealhty1 1 year ago
You are still alive, so good job!
mannhorn34 1 year ago
yes, mean sea level
santymar 1 year ago
what's problem?????? uffufuufuuu
suspendbrid 1 year ago
Stol aircraft. 9,000 ft How hot was it? Seems you came low and slow. You're were hanging on a stall.
tappan48 1 year ago
Some like 68 to 70 F.
santymar 1 year ago
what went wrong bro?
svinu121 1 year ago
@svinu121 he lost too much air speed, then the plane just fell out of the sky, when you land with the motor off like that, you need to come in and land not try to hang in the air so long..
nighthawk0077 1 year ago
@nighthawk0077 to me it looks like the trees blocking the head wind was what caused him to fall out of the sky they need to cut down more trees around that air strip
HOPPERFZR 11 months ago
What does 9000 feet msl mean? does it mean that the airport is 9000 feet above sea level?
Profama36 1 year ago 2
It is correct.
santymar 1 year ago
@santymar mean sea level
TylerKirkFilms 1 year ago
@Profama36 MSL = mean sea level, a measure of the average height of the ocean's surface.
27charliee 1 year ago
if it is 9000 ft msl, performance would be less, lift component would be less. you came high and fast maybe on idle expecting lift component as you level and flare, but at 9000 msl it wouldnt be likely so. anyway you walked away that whats important mate.
skipper1ify 1 year ago
not close to a crash just bad landing
youngestpilotinGa 1 year ago
May b just a small throttle would helpful.They stalled on last seconds.
chiccoka 1 year ago
fait exprès pas de vitesse
Alain042000 1 year ago
Almost crash?
Just a crap landing, no "almost crash" there.
TheJapanChannelDcom 1 year ago
Every landing that you can get out of the plane walking with your own legs is a good landing!
tensoares 1 year ago
looks like the landing gear is bend..
LTF85199 1 year ago
he bent the shit out of the landing gear!
Lithoushine 1 year ago
The touch makes the airplane to transform un a " S "... Dangerous!
HamasCaveira 1 year ago
Air is thin that high and fools pilot. Sometimes when you get too slow down you go.
BushPilot444 1 year ago
Following a prop strike and undercarriage damage, it'd have been more prudent of the pilot to shut down the engine at the earliest opportunity and NOT taxi along the strip. This is a good instructional video of what not to do whilst landing (high alpha, insufficient airspeed) and what not to do after an accident!
pete2778 1 year ago
that plane has trouble breathing up there!
Croopskate 1 year ago
fail
masterpeec 1 year ago
9000 feet msl?! what was the temperature?
sowmach 1 year ago
some like 68 F or 20 C.
santymar 1 year ago
@santymar where is this?
Iris421989 1 year ago
@Iris421989
This field is near to Quito, Ecuador South America.
santymar 1 year ago
good stall !!
zorro051969 1 year ago
Only a broken prop? You you had a prop strike? How much was the engine inspection and rebuild that was needed because of the prop strike?
sapper6fd 1 year ago
God. If you can't land one of those light STOL planes get out of aviation. Honestly.
marick626 2 years ago
@marick626 best comment made by man
Jabiruz 1 year ago
I zawieszenie do wymiany...
warkot2233 2 years ago
The camera location and angle make it a bit difficult to get the full effect. Doesn't look all that bad to me, you handled it well. at what point did you think you may "smite" the Earth? lol
Did you build it, or was it "ready to fly"? Was this shot in Columbia, or?
Sounds like it may be a Rotax, is it? Thanks for posting.
pizamoto 2 years ago
This shot was in Quito, Ecuador.
The plane was ready to fly, it isn't mine.
It has a Rotax 912S
santymar 2 years ago
@pizamoto nah id say it was pretty bad (the impact not the landing) .. i can imagine it would be a difficult approach tho.
silencecom 1 year ago
Woow !!
jcbmartinique 2 years ago
Comment removed
youtrein 2 years ago
Woow !!! So hard ! Wonderful landscape !!
youtrein 2 years ago
That aircraft is not a CH701, it is a Savannah. You can tell by the shape of the wing over the cockpit.
aerhearts 2 years ago
it isn`t a Savannah, It is a MXP740 made in Colombia.
santymar 2 years ago
God that grass is beautiful
flanksteak2 2 years ago 2
good, enjoying the little things in live...
coxairman 2 years ago
Either there was no elevator authority left or there was no attempt to use it before the touch down. More speed would have helped on that windy day.
bushpilot50 2 years ago
it wasn´t a windy day.
santymar 2 years ago
looks like a toy.
Xiber1 2 years ago
silky smooth
mrbushpilot 2 years ago
The birds just went on singing impervious to the landing!
Brough1111 2 years ago
keep your throttle hand alive and your eyes on the airspeed indicator
ritualghost 2 years ago 2
That's what we call a low energy landing.
spidercoinc 2 years ago
Why 'land' when you can get to 10 feet and just drop the plane on the ground :)
pylon500 2 years ago 16
Stalled right at 0:24 is my guess.
kitmm 2 years ago 3
@kitmm, bang on, mate, he should have noticed how much elevator he was having to hold in on the approach and watched his airspeed more carefully. Generally, a 'natural' pilot knows from his control response how much authourity he has left and he really should have increased his power and airspeed to take into account the elevation of the airstrip. Good job nobody was hurt and he probably learned a lot from this, if he didn't, he should quit flying and be thankfull he's alive!
pete2778 1 year ago
Dear Sir,
You have CH701 in your list of "tags"
Please be honest. This airplane is NOT a Zenith CH701 ! Could this airplane be a Savanna, perhaps?
The truth is, that this is a very bad, unauthorized copy of a very fine STOL airplane. I am not surprised that you got into trouble with this airplane. I am glad that you were not hurt.
Please be honest and admit that this is NOT A CH701.
Please remove the ch701 tag from this video. Thank you.
Respectfully submitted.
StolAdventures 2 years ago
OK, the name of the video was changed, the plane is not mine, it only visited my field. The plane is a MXP740 made in Colombia.
santymar 2 years ago
Scar face would say, Coolumbia mang.
ismasamov55 2 years ago
no the plane stalled
dondycluck 2 years ago
I'm still trying to figure out why they were landing at a golf course?
ericsonfire84 2 years ago
Because we don´t have another place to land.
santymar 2 years ago
Looks like a microlite to me
sakoshooter48 2 years ago
CLUNK!
GerbilEssences 2 years ago
Flare a bit early?
helipilot727 2 years ago 2
(1) thats sucks, but happens (2) if you dont have wings, don't make fun! Do you think the pilot or his family thought this was "funny"? (3) details? how was the engine/gear box after prop strike? (4) THANKS for the video...without these, REAL pilots like myself would not be able to learn from others mistakes! stuff like this just happens sometimes, It takes a humble (& courageous) person to "advertise" thier errors in the hopes that others may learn!
waszak1977 2 years ago
A few hours later, the prop shaft failed (Rotax 912S) and the plane was damaged , no personal injures.
santymar 2 years ago
he should have been inspecting the hell out of that plane after such an awful landing, he would have discovered the damage
itsumonihon 2 years ago
sink
modelwoddle 2 years ago
I can feel sorry for somebody who made a mistake unpurposely, but not for somebody who knew what they were doing.....
xawierz 2 years ago
bump bump
ronald73blue 2 years ago
9000ft AMSL would mean GS of 100kts. The pilot looked a little hasty, and I'm guessing he had wind sheer and curl-over from those trees. Though it is easy to comment when you're not there!
peanuts2105 2 years ago
why are you relating a particular altitude to GS? To the best of my knowledge, which is pretty good, the only thing that affects GS is wind, I don't see why 9000 ft means 100 kts. Just wondering, might save my life some day.
200407013 2 years ago
Re:The "more info" box said the airfield is 9000ft AMSL.
What I should of said: IAS of 75-ish kts would result in a ground speed around 100 kts at that altitude; with that speed and the thin air plus other factors such as wind sheer, there is an increased chance of a crash, hence....
Regards
peanuts2105 2 years ago
It is correct, 9000 ft AMSL, the wind was calm.
santymar 2 years ago
Umm. It's called density altitude and affects the way the pitot-static systems in the airplane interpret air data. The higher you are, the slower the airplane thinks its going because the air is less dense.
kimiles1 2 years ago
Hard landing & prop strike & you keep taxing???????? I'm glad your ok, I hope you sent engine/ gearbox out for inspection .
slickjimmy76 2 years ago
Prop strike - 26 seconds in, spit second later the sound of the prop catches up with the video. Overhaul the engine, check the engine mounts and hope to god there isnt much damage. the overhaul for that engine because of the strike isnt going to be cheap.
sapper6fd 2 years ago
It looks like he tried to land to quickly. Hard to tell the surface from the vid but surely he could have kept up more speed and just gently touched down later on. But then I can't see what the runway was exactly like.
FFTVAviation 2 years ago
plop
bamasbulldogs 2 years ago
Really greased it in huh?
RayAir1 2 years ago 9
ok .....drop the dope and scram.........lol
crash1956 2 years ago
that landing strip reminds me of Blow (movie)
NosBlaster 2 years ago
Good God man, it wasn't even windy-
RayAir1 2 years ago
Remember, the air at higher altitudes is thinner and it could've been a high density-altitude day, making things worse. It happens, at least the plane was repairable.
SenorSpode 2 years ago 2
Dont feel so bad man. I crap my pants at the thought of making a landing at 90 MSL
gumimalac 2 years ago
Luckily the ground was there to break his fall.
chueffer 2 years ago
lol
nicklking 2 years ago
I Bet You Hav Tonns Of Money
krisraps 2 years ago
Stalled it on and not only that when it did stall the pilot tried holding it back more :(
mjok2004 3 years ago
So would I ... too close to deck to do much else. I think it would have stuffed otherwise.
sixmagpies 2 years ago
He bent the gear !!! If you look carefully, the right gear is bent, and the plane is listing to the right. Also, it sounds like he nicked the prop on the ground, there is a slight delay due to the distance, but when he bounced I heard the prop blades hitting. To bad, he had LOTS of room to spare, there was no need to be flying final that slow. He stopped in 1/3 the runway, but he damaged his plane doing it...
JetPilott 3 years ago 2
watch out for wind gradient (it seems to be quite windy)
belgianhorst 3 years ago
why so slow in final: plane was stalling immediately when levelling out near ground, it dropped 2m in stall to the ground. If you get hit by a thermal in final...
belgianhorst 3 years ago
It looks like a Savannah (or other STOL CH 701 copy): The wing root is different and it may have a weaker landing gear ?
stolflyer 3 years ago
Yes, it is a MXP740, Colombian copy.
santymar 3 years ago
Yes. Very strong airplane. I make hard landings too :)
kazakhpilot 3 years ago