god only has come once in human form..guy name was jesus from bethelen..was2000..even tho we in 21th century we are not as evolve as him..this guys believe there s no god..or even that they are more evolve than god..how can that happen..answer..only god knows.. jeje
In other, caller, breeder couple can get a host of automatic legal contractual benefits their companionate or reproductive relationships but gay/lesbian couples have to pay a lawyer to draw up a similar contract. Fuck you, caller, and the fucking double standard you rode in on!
i dont either see the point of marrige but i dont say that gays cant get married, the fuck should i care, anyone wanna strap on the chackles do it, not my problem.
@Gunner3210 I am straight. This is the dumbest comment ever.
Wow guys see, because i started with the words "im straight" it proves my proceding statement! God damn, I can prove hitler was doing gods work now as long as i make sure to put the words "Im straight" before them!
What is totally offensive is the drip drip of perverse liberal political correctness constantly on offer from the left. Their utterly revolting gay marriage campaign, which started when they realised there was no more blood to be sucked from the victimhood of the workers, is like some vile version of 1984, with the Ministry of love taking on a totally new and utterly menacing role.
The entire population has been brainwashed by these people.
Their repulsive propaganda must be strongly opposed.
i believe in GOD and i always will and i love this show. the knuckle draggers that call in are just so funny its sad when christians are forced to be biggots toward those things that the bible frowns down upon. when studied the bible frowns upon nearly everything . .... love is what is important love and respect the respect all humans animals plant life everything deserves to have. we have been given something special lets look after it and eachother. love the show keep it up. bless you .
Poor form from all 3 speakers. The argument goes that a child should have influence from 2 parents but they should be of different gender to give the child a balanced upbringing. The girl here has an obvious bias and NEEDS to avoid this issue. Russell avoids the issue consequently and the caller misses the point entirely. This call was useless
@fadechicobuarque1989 I see a rewording might be in order - The argument is that the optimal way to raise a child is with a mum and dad. The point remains the same.
@Pigroota Ok, the best way (and I kind of get it, it is nice to have influence of both genders, but you could have that kind of influence for other person that is not a parent) to raise kids. So the second best way, like a single parent or a gay couple should be allowed or not? Is it right or not?
@fadechicobuarque1989 Nah man, your question is loaded with rhetoric. The word optimal suggests only the best way. I never said anything about what comes next nor whether it is right or wrong. My original point was that all three people in this clip avoid that question (to the caller's detriment). If you are asking my opinion - people deserve freedom. Besides which, I've seen many a moron (mum/dad) raising little morons. I can't see how gay/single parents could be any worse
@Pigroota I got it, but I think the avoided it because they knew it would lead to some problem issues – you pointed one yourself: why assume that a couple would be naturally more apt; they can be morons. Also, the influence of other genders does not have to come from the parents. But your honest opinion about how is better to choose a parent that is not a moron then to care about orientation is right on my book! :-)
@fadechicobuarque1989 Well I dunno if a child can choose a parent. LoL. But yeah, ceteris parabis, it would be optimal to have a mum and dad. Fun convo. Latorz!
@Pigroota Ok. Why is a mum and a dad better then two moms and a uncle? not trying to be against you - you just seem cool to talk to about those subjects.
@fadechicobuarque1989 That is a different discussion. I say different because the assertion, all other things being equal, that having a mum and dad provides a more balanced upbringing appears obvious. Now you are dealing with triviality, which the assertion is not. I.e., it is a good topic to discuss. Unfortunately I cannot delve deeply into this area because I am neither a family planner or psychologist. I am an accountant but I can give you my opinion again if you like?
@Pigroota 1) Sir (or lady), I am nothing shor then impressed by your sincere definitions of the boundaries between your opinion on the subject and the possible opinion of specialists. It is a rare and good thing when we see people recognizing their limitations on a subject on youtube and I am truly thankful for your answers.You were smart & clear about your basis and logic. I thank you and leave you with a joke: (continue)
@fadechicobuarque1989 Oh btw, that was not an opinion on the subject. It was logic, aimed at assessing the foundations of an argument, which has nothing to do with opinion or interpretation. For an assumption to be axiomatic it must be obviously true or trivially true. In my case the assumption was (seemed) obviously true.
@Pigroota 1) I think I smell a philosopher or, at least, someone with a very good knowledge of philosophy. The comment section has a commercial importance to YouTube and, frankly speaking, it is a media and, therefore, informative in some level. I like di discuss with people here and running into the eventual troll is compensated by the opportunity to have conversations such as this.
@Pigroota 2) Also, you should know that the colloquial use of the term opinion does not exclude demonstrably logical conclusions about well researched subjects.
@fadechicobuarque1989 Fair enough. But I don't think Plato was opining monarchy/aristocracy to be the ultimate form of government in "Republic". Nor that Kant hesitated to write "Critique" because he thought it was only opinion. But I see your point.
Now then, here's an article for you which parallels my own belief about mediums such as youtube. It describes the effect of these mediums as more than merely psychological but -->
--> also physiological - "Is Google Making Us Stupid? Why You Can't Read the Way You Used To". If you can't get access to the database, message me and I will email it to you (if you are interested). It is not published in a highly ranked journal, but is interesting nonetheless.
@Pigroota It seems a nice reading. I will look it up. See: look what we can acquire in terms of references here! I am from brazil and here censorship to any media is a touchy subject. I will take a look at that – I have to admit that I am kind of opposite to the idea already, since I like to look at any mean of communication as benign by nature, but I am reasonable and you can expect me to take this work in consideration.
Youtube is a fascinating medium. On one hand you have a distancing between people and their protagonists/antagonists which to me seems likely to result in vitriolic narcissism. On the other hand, you hear peoples' true opinions about topics with the occasional insightful, even profound, comment. To me the latter does not balance out the former. I think that, although benign, it might be better to remove the comments section from youtube
@fadechicobuarque1989 In other words, it is neither right nor wrong for gay parents to raise kids. It is just sub-optimal. Freedom, however, is right.
This guy is missing the point marriage is also a legal contract that grants specific duties and privilegies to both parts entering into the agreement.
@DemoraX Dont forget thye also victimize themselves and want special treatment because they feel the world owes them something. So that kinna defeats the whole equal rights thing because equal rights means....equal rights.
@TheGuinnessboys They "victimize" themselves because they ARE victims of constant unprovoked hatred and discrimination from both society, and the government. They don't think the world owes them any more than it owes you, they just want to be considered equals, and I'm sure they'd also appreciate not having to deal with the idiotic remarks they get on a daily basis from parochial simpletons like you. :P
This is what happens when you live in a trailer with only two channels on TV, one book [the bible] and have two ignorant drunk parents to guide you through life.
these people are unbelievable!!! people can do WHATEVER they want if what they are doing affects NO ONE except for the people involved, and these people themselves are usually POSITIVELY affected.
Because simple minded people are OFFENDED by things that DO NOT APPEAL to them based on their RELIGIOUS views is no reason to dem these things MORALLY WRONG. These people themselves are morally twisted!!
nature as a scientific concept is defined as everything that exists in the realm of reality. I don't know why people insist that if something is man made it's stops being natural. If a bird builds a nest it's nature, but if a man builds a house it's artificial. I don't get it.
Traditional Biblical marriage is defined as: 1 man + 1 woman, 1 man + many women (including wives, slaves, and concubines), 1 man + any woman that he raped, 1 man + any woman he captured in battle, 1 man + 1 prostitute he happens across.
You only need to refer to one single phrase in this caller's argument to realize he's a MORON: "it's definitely unnatural because it's scientific". Once he says that, he removes all doubt that he's a mindless, science-hating, brainwashed theist nutcase.
This marriage shit is easy, all it means THESE DAYS is way to express life long commitment to a person and make it legally recognized. Anyone has a right to do that with whoever they want, however it's also the right of the religions to deny taking part in the ceremony, religion is a club, they can make the rules whatever they want so they can be exclusive like that. It's not just gays, they do this to straight people in certain circumstances too.
He thinks he's special for having a heterosexual marriage and giving birth to his heterosexual offspring who will probably end up in prison from the way his parents teach and having homosexual intercourse with his cellmates...But the only fertal kids he'll be having is the premature ones leaking out of his ass.
@funcpl2741054 - "You ever notice that everyone who believes in creationism looks really unevolved? Eyes real close together, big furry hands and feet. "I believe God created me in one day." Yeah, looks like he rushed it." -Bill Hicks
Yeah, If the lesbian woman in this video wants to have kids with HER WIFE/HUSBAND ?... they can...and if it turns out to be a boy on ultrasound they can eliminate that one and keep trying until they have a little girl. I'm sure they are FOR "abortion on demand". I mean what's to stop them, they have NO GOD, no REAL moral blockades.Morals without God are what YOU say they are.That's the whole point, not having to answer to a higher power, whom you don't believe in to begin with, so NO problem.
@tcfizz555 im an atheist, born and raised in texas. One of the FEW. Though i didnt come out till after i left texas. And then i didnt start announcing it and defending my disbeliefs when i left the country for a couple years.
the purpose of marriage to me is a lot more than just to raise children. Love is involved here. i hope this guy isn't married. his wife(according to him) is nothing but a baby machine. what an ignorant jackass.
This caller is obviously ignorant. He made no valid point, and clearly hadn't really thought it out at all. This is the problem with the anti-gay marriage side. It's all about sex, and morality from a biblical standpoint. It's also mainly christians here in the US that are against gay marriage, and according to many I talk to they say they are not bound by the old testament due to jesus's sacrifice, but then cling to it on the subject of gay marriage. Don't they see this contradiction?
2:43 "Definitely not natural because it's scientific" Well, given that science is the branch that studies the nature of reality and nature being included into reality...
SHE HAS A SON WITH TWO MOMS? GONNA BE A FAG FOR SURE. GAY PEOPLE ARGUE WELL, BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO. NOTHING MORALLY SOUND ABOUT GAY ADOPTIONS, CONCEPTIONS THROUGH AID, OR A PARENT BRINGING SAME SEX PARTNERS INTO THE HOUSE. ALSO SHE SAID SHE WANTED A LEGAL SITUATION. THAT IS FINE BUT CHILDREN ARE IN DANGER OF SWINGING THE WRONG WAY. IT IS UNHOLY. THAT IS THE BASIS OF ALL THESE ARGUMENTS.
@JamesHLanier I TYPE IN ALL CAPS CAUSE IM HALF BLIND. PLUS MY IMAC IS HOOKED UP TO MY TV. HAVE TROUBLE DETERMINING PROPER DISTANCE. I THINK INTERNET ETIQUETTE IS FOR ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL REASONS ANYHOW...
@deboles - I would suggest a bigger screen og better glasses, or a braille-unit then. Caps Lock is like shouting, you wouldn't stand in the middle of a grocery store shouting at the top of your lungs, even if you have disabilities. It's rude to shout, and nobody cares about your eyesight.
If you're serious (it's hard to tell when people say really ignorant shit whether they're joking or trolling or, hard to imagine, really THAT ignorant), homosexuality isn't communicable. It's not like a disease. Children don't get swayed one way or the other and then choose to be gay. It doesn't work that way.
Hmm while there may be additional footage for this video that explains in more detail the circular logic here, I don't see how the caller's issue was answered by the hosts. At the end he stated that Gay couples want more adoption rights through marriage. How was he incorrect?
Also it seemed his major claim was the ideal couple for bringing up a child is a male/female duo. So, putting these two together is his opinion: Gay couples would be bad for a child. No studies prove either position. So???
Who cares if he doesn't see the point anyways? Laws and constitutions are made precisely to prevent bigoted assholes like this guy from trampling over other people's basic rights. Heck, the gay community shouldn't even have to fight this absurd battle to get social acknowledgement of their basic rights in the first place.
He can have negative opinions on gay people if he wants, but from there to limiting their rights only because of prejudice and primitive supertition is just stupid.
Nobody else will have to deal with it but the kid, And you do not know how it will effect the child, Mentally, Spiritually or physically. Morality is gone when immorality is out of nowhere stuffed in the general public's face. in every body's face Your child!. Nobody can force Christianity upon anybody. What makes people think you can just stuff corruption in every body's face Without some kind of war?Cross the line, But with time your aging flesh will lead you to truth. Sincerely-- AJS.
@Damienelite Damien, this is your father! Your father and I have told you not to comment on this subject anymore. Now watch me lay into your god given right as a natural son and turn your view upside down on what is good and pure, Oh and right. oh and by the way, Is your little buddy tony coming to stay the night tonight? You need to play like a little boy, Just like daddy and I taught you. GO CALL HIM!
What's funny about deboles is that he just keeps referring back to the Bible when ranting against homosexuality, even though no atheist would take the Bible at its word (I for one think it's a terrible, immoral book). Furthermore, if the Bible is the only reason to oppose gay marriage, then the opponents have already lost, given that the US is a secular republic, with a constitution that never mentions god and explicitly separates church and state.
@funcpl2741054 REALLY? SO WHAT IS THE WORD FOR DOING WHATEVER YOU WANT WITHOUT REGARD OF CONSEQUENCE? OOOH I GOT IT! DESTRUCTIVE. SIN IS SIN. ITS A DAMNED NOUN. SYNONYMOUS WITH MORONIC IN MY BOOK...
What the caller is trying to sat is, as a Christian, he knows homosexuality is morally wrong. now, the purpose of marriage is to glorify God. That is the only true purpose. Homosexuals cannot glorify God. They can be good, and have faith, blah, blah, blah, but homosexuality is a sin. In honesty, homosexuals would not live very long if Jesus had not given us the Golden rule. The Old Testament laws are more harsh for sinners. Yes GAYS= sinners. The state laws allow civil unions, but its sin.
@deboles That's all well and good. If you're a Christian who believes that, then I guess you should abstain from homosexual sex. However, I'm not a Christian. So I don't accept this premise of sin. Am I bound by your religion's rules?
@deboles I don't agree that homosexuality is morally wrong nor do I agree that marriage (a state contract) is intended to glorify god. You're going to need to back those assertions up.
@ianat841 I REALLY DONT NEED TO. EVERY HUMAN ON EARTH KNOWS DICKS DONT GO IN ASSHOLES, AND THAT CUNNILINGUS IN GENERAL IS WRONG AND PERVERSE. SO IT MAKES YOU FEEL GOOD. ITS STILL PERVERSE. AMERICANS THINK EVERYTHING THEY "WANT" TO DO IS A DAMNED LIBERTY. WELL, CHURCH AND STATE ARE SEP. HOWEVR, THE STATE WANTS TO CONTROL PPULATION SO THEY INTERVENE IN ISSUES SUCH AS MARRIAGE AND COMMON-LAW MARRIAGE. IF NOT FOR THAT FOLLY, GAY MARRIAGE WOULD BE NON-EXISTANT. ALLOWING GOV'T IN DIVORCE AND MATRIMONY
@deboles ASK ANY HOMOSEXUAL THE PURPOSE OF SEX AND THEY WILL TELL YOU ITS REPRODUCTION-UNLESS YOU ASK A PERV. WHILE BEING GAY MAY OR MAY NOT "FEEL" WRONG, WE ALL KNOW IT IS. IF IT DONT FIT YOU MUST UM, QUIT!
@deboles BTW I dont know where to begin countering your statements. Its incredibly easy but there is so much to pick apart. I feel like a kid in a candy store.
@deboles Really? Cause people have anal sex all the time. If it don't fit I must quit. Well then I should stop having sex with my girlfriend. And also retard separation of church and state is the an extremely good thing. Cause then we'd have you Adolf burning everyone that disagrees with you. STOP TYPING IN CAPS. I'm sure even if we could hear you we wouldn't care being you're just spewing out homophobic non-sense.
@DJ100101 YOU MUST BE A FAG. I TYPE IN CAPS BECAUSE I WANT TO. FUCK INTERNET ETIQUETTE. I GAVE MY OPINION AND YOU PROCEEDED TO USE NEGATIVE ADJECTIVES TOWARDS ME. IF THIS WAS IN PERSON I WOULDNT EVEN FUCKING TALK TO YOU. FUCK ALL YOU HONKEYS.
@deboles Sir, I don't see the need for you to be bringing up my race. Second, I'm not gay. I have a girlfriend with whom I have had sex with many times. And yes mmm vagina feels great, but I still don't see the point of gays being discriminated. Oh and by the way, you gave your opinion and I offered mine as a an argument towards it. I'd say don't get your panties in a bunch but that'd be too gay for you.
@deboles Everyone who isn't a bigoted, close minded moron knows homosexuality isn't a choice. No reasonable human would choose to be treated the way you douchebags treat homosexuals. As the bible says, man is created in god's image. As such, your god is a "FAG."
@Zero9656 YUP. YOU ARE A FAG. JUST KIDDING. LETS BE SERIOUS. AND I DO APOLOGIZE, I WAS IN THE MOMENT WHEN I SAID THAT ON MY LAST POST. ANYWAYS, HOMOSEXUALITY "IS" A CHOICE. FEELINGS ARE NOT AND WE ARE ALL BORN WITH SEXUAL PREFERENCE. THE HARD TRUTH IS SEX IS A PART OF MARRIAGE. WE AS HUMANS ARE SO PERVERTED-THERE IS NO TELLING HOW BADLY HOMOSEXUALITY HAS BECOME IN OUR COMMUNITIES. ON ONE HAND, GAYS ARE EQUAL, BUT AT AN APEX, HOMOSEXUALITY CAN DECIMATE THE HUMAN RACE. WHAT YOU THINK?
@Zero9656 MY MIND IS FINE FAGGOT. JUST BECAUSE YOU WANT SOME ASS, DOESNT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO GET SOME. GO KILL YOURSELF AND PLEASE STOP WRITING ME. PEOPLE WILL THINK IM GAY TOO. MORON.
@deboles LOL You don't even realize why your comment is retarded.
As for your gayness, it's too late. No one argues this vehemently against gay marriage unless they're pissed off about their homosexuality. It's okay, though. The bible was written by men, not god. So, the only people who are going to hate you are your fellow ignorant, bible thumping morons.
I think you're just a troll. Before you said you typed in all caps cuz you were "half blind"....now you say "fuck internet etiquette"...you're just an asshole, plain and simple. Go away.
Um, you haven't backed up your assertion that gay marriage is wrong, you just ranted incoherently. If this is the best you can do, no wonder 50% of the US population now thinks gay marriage should be legal (and 71% of college freshman think so). The opponents of gay marriage have no arguments.
What, you became half-blind within the last 3 weeks? What happened? To answer your points: he THINKS homosexuality is morally wrong, but HE is wrong, it's not. The purpose of marriage is NOT to glorify god. Right, homosexuals cannot glorify god, because god doesn't exist. Homosexuality is not a sin. Furthermore, sin doesn't exist. Golden rule sentence: yeah, "moral" christians would murder them, right? Is THAT morally right? It's moral to murder, but not to be gay?
The host misses a very big counterpoint to the caller's argument. Adoption. If the caller's point is that gays shouldn't marry because they cannot naturally produce children, then how are straight couples allowed to adopt children?
@HelFKiernan i could care less on marriage as its not needed for a continuation of the species i would say it goes against nature a defect to be bi is surely more logic as we atheists go for as it would still insure the race this is ofcourse solved by adoption and is in fact better as instead of bringing a new life we are saving one already here thus making our world a better place that aside you can't say that being strictly gay does not go against nature? no offence just curious on thought
Marriage has never been about raising children. It's in fact existed long before religion came into the picture and fucked everything up. It originally signified that a couple would be devoted to each other for the rest of their lives, and then religion came in and asserted its own bigoted views
Was a virgin birth unnatural?
KILL THE VIRGIN MARY , lol.
LogicalStatements3 2 hours ago
god only has come once in human form..guy name was jesus from bethelen..was2000..even tho we in 21th century we are not as evolve as him..this guys believe there s no god..or even that they are more evolve than god..how can that happen..answer..only god knows.. jeje
joe744 4 hours ago
Since when is "something scientific" unnatural?
lessfapmorenap 8 hours ago
"No, not really. It just sounds like that."
That sounds a lot like Christianity:
"You claims seem unreasonable and misinformed. I mean, talking snakes!"
"No they're not. They just sound like that."
ReasonPublic 11 hours ago
As a wise man once said-
Gay''s should be allowed to marry...they should be as miserable as the rest of us!
funkydanieluk 12 hours ago
Gah, power to Jen for being so patient against this retard. I'm not gay but if I were there, I would have torn that guy a new asshole!
njintau 13 hours ago
In other, caller, breeder couple can get a host of automatic legal contractual benefits their companionate or reproductive relationships but gay/lesbian couples have to pay a lawyer to draw up a similar contract. Fuck you, caller, and the fucking double standard you rode in on!
Kailoa36 13 hours ago
Headphone users RIP
Orthrus 18 hours ago
my Dog religious FuckTards are so abtuse!!!
FUwogs 1 day ago
Its definitely unnatural coz its scientific
TheBongBaron12 3 days ago 5
He started arguing about gays adopting but wtf is wrong with adoption? Shouldn't that be more the reason to allow them to marry? What a buffoon!
KillaTequilla83 5 days ago
i dont either see the point of marrige but i dont say that gays cant get married, the fuck should i care, anyone wanna strap on the chackles do it, not my problem.
Danovio 5 days ago
I am straight. This caller is the biggest moron ever.
Gunner3210 6 days ago
@Gunner3210 I am straight. This is the dumbest comment ever.
Wow guys see, because i started with the words "im straight" it proves my proceding statement! God damn, I can prove hitler was doing gods work now as long as i make sure to put the words "Im straight" before them!
dem0nthesis 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What is totally offensive is the drip drip of perverse liberal political correctness constantly on offer from the left. Their utterly revolting gay marriage campaign, which started when they realised there was no more blood to be sucked from the victimhood of the workers, is like some vile version of 1984, with the Ministry of love taking on a totally new and utterly menacing role.
The entire population has been brainwashed by these people.
Their repulsive propaganda must be strongly opposed.
johnzbarleycorn 6 days ago
I really admire Jen and Russell for being able to stay so cool during these crazy calls. I would have ripped into that guy.
valkolakk 1 week ago
"you've got your mind made up and you think you're right" HMM....and that is different from you HOW???
2803pink 1 week ago
I love this show, but they need better microphones
2803pink 1 week ago
i believe in GOD and i always will and i love this show. the knuckle draggers that call in are just so funny its sad when christians are forced to be biggots toward those things that the bible frowns down upon. when studied the bible frowns upon nearly everything . .... love is what is important love and respect the respect all humans animals plant life everything deserves to have. we have been given something special lets look after it and eachother. love the show keep it up. bless you .
TheCackles68 1 week ago
Personally I'd rather see a child raised by a gay couple heavily into bdsm and animalsex, than a normal heterosexual, but religious couple.
soskid 1 week ago
@soskid
i'd agree. it's not about the gender so much as the capability of the parents
infernalone666 1 week ago
@infernalone666 Also, A little BDSM and animalsex will be much less damaging than having religion shoved down their throat. lol
soskid 1 week ago
idunno'boutthemdangolgaysb'ifyougetlotsaguyswiddeirdingdongsits jus propg lgp'n'dapooper lookin'prettyweirdtome
Invisibrah 1 week ago
Poor form from all 3 speakers. The argument goes that a child should have influence from 2 parents but they should be of different gender to give the child a balanced upbringing. The girl here has an obvious bias and NEEDS to avoid this issue. Russell avoids the issue consequently and the caller misses the point entirely. This call was useless
Pigroota 1 week ago
@Pigroota so... a single person should not have a kid?
fadechicobuarque1989 1 week ago
@fadechicobuarque1989 I see a rewording might be in order - The argument is that the optimal way to raise a child is with a mum and dad. The point remains the same.
Pigroota 1 week ago
@Pigroota Ok, the best way (and I kind of get it, it is nice to have influence of both genders, but you could have that kind of influence for other person that is not a parent) to raise kids. So the second best way, like a single parent or a gay couple should be allowed or not? Is it right or not?
fadechicobuarque1989 1 week ago
@fadechicobuarque1989 Nah man, your question is loaded with rhetoric. The word optimal suggests only the best way. I never said anything about what comes next nor whether it is right or wrong. My original point was that all three people in this clip avoid that question (to the caller's detriment). If you are asking my opinion - people deserve freedom. Besides which, I've seen many a moron (mum/dad) raising little morons. I can't see how gay/single parents could be any worse
Pigroota 1 week ago
@Pigroota I got it, but I think the avoided it because they knew it would lead to some problem issues – you pointed one yourself: why assume that a couple would be naturally more apt; they can be morons. Also, the influence of other genders does not have to come from the parents. But your honest opinion about how is better to choose a parent that is not a moron then to care about orientation is right on my book! :-)
fadechicobuarque1989 1 week ago
@fadechicobuarque1989 Well I dunno if a child can choose a parent. LoL. But yeah, ceteris parabis, it would be optimal to have a mum and dad. Fun convo. Latorz!
Pigroota 1 week ago
@Pigroota You do realizes that break-ups/divorces are far more frequent between heterosexuals than homosexuals, right?
kaihedgie 1 week ago
@kaihedgie I did say "ceteris parabis". The argument holds.
Pigroota 1 week ago
Comment removed
fadechicobuarque1989 1 week ago
@Pigroota Ok. Why is a mum and a dad better then two moms and a uncle? not trying to be against you - you just seem cool to talk to about those subjects.
fadechicobuarque1989 1 week ago
@fadechicobuarque1989 That is a different discussion. I say different because the assertion, all other things being equal, that having a mum and dad provides a more balanced upbringing appears obvious. Now you are dealing with triviality, which the assertion is not. I.e., it is a good topic to discuss. Unfortunately I cannot delve deeply into this area because I am neither a family planner or psychologist. I am an accountant but I can give you my opinion again if you like?
Pigroota 1 week ago
@Pigroota 1) Sir (or lady), I am nothing shor then impressed by your sincere definitions of the boundaries between your opinion on the subject and the possible opinion of specialists. It is a rare and good thing when we see people recognizing their limitations on a subject on youtube and I am truly thankful for your answers.You were smart & clear about your basis and logic. I thank you and leave you with a joke: (continue)
fadechicobuarque1989 1 week ago
@fadechicobuarque1989 Oh btw, that was not an opinion on the subject. It was logic, aimed at assessing the foundations of an argument, which has nothing to do with opinion or interpretation. For an assumption to be axiomatic it must be obviously true or trivially true. In my case the assumption was (seemed) obviously true.
Pigroota 1 week ago
@Pigroota 1) I think I smell a philosopher or, at least, someone with a very good knowledge of philosophy. The comment section has a commercial importance to YouTube and, frankly speaking, it is a media and, therefore, informative in some level. I like di discuss with people here and running into the eventual troll is compensated by the opportunity to have conversations such as this.
fadechicobuarque1989 6 days ago
@Pigroota 2) Also, you should know that the colloquial use of the term opinion does not exclude demonstrably logical conclusions about well researched subjects.
fadechicobuarque1989 6 days ago
@fadechicobuarque1989 Fair enough. But I don't think Plato was opining monarchy/aristocracy to be the ultimate form of government in "Republic". Nor that Kant hesitated to write "Critique" because he thought it was only opinion. But I see your point.
Now then, here's an article for you which parallels my own belief about mediums such as youtube. It describes the effect of these mediums as more than merely psychological but -->
Pigroota 6 days ago
--> also physiological - "Is Google Making Us Stupid? Why You Can't Read the Way You Used To". If you can't get access to the database, message me and I will email it to you (if you are interested). It is not published in a highly ranked journal, but is interesting nonetheless.
Pigroota 6 days ago
@Pigroota It seems a nice reading. I will look it up. See: look what we can acquire in terms of references here! I am from brazil and here censorship to any media is a touchy subject. I will take a look at that – I have to admit that I am kind of opposite to the idea already, since I like to look at any mean of communication as benign by nature, but I am reasonable and you can expect me to take this work in consideration.
fadechicobuarque1989 6 days ago
@Pigroota 2) (here)
Religion is like a penis.
It’s fine to have one.
It’s fine to be proud of it.
But please don’t rub it on people faces and PLEASE don’t shove it down my (or even your) kids throats.
fadechicobuarque1989 1 week ago
@fadechicobuarque1989 LoL - touche.
Youtube is a fascinating medium. On one hand you have a distancing between people and their protagonists/antagonists which to me seems likely to result in vitriolic narcissism. On the other hand, you hear peoples' true opinions about topics with the occasional insightful, even profound, comment. To me the latter does not balance out the former. I think that, although benign, it might be better to remove the comments section from youtube
Pigroota 1 week ago
@fadechicobuarque1989 In other words, it is neither right nor wrong for gay parents to raise kids. It is just sub-optimal. Freedom, however, is right.
Pigroota 1 week ago
@Pigroota Ok, freedom, agree. BUT - why is it optimal to have two straigth parents? I think other factors are more important.
fadechicobuarque1989 1 week ago
Where did babies come from before marriage then.?
So, do away with marriage for several years and we can reduce the population of the world, no more starvation or unwanted children.
perosthedog 1 week ago
I support gay marriage, but only if both chicks are hot!.
HessenDragoon 1 week ago
Also, people can and do raise children without being married. This guy is ridiculous; I have no idea how anyone can think so circular.
xXp3rsonaXx 1 week ago
there is a giant list of animals that have homosexual relationships.
ANBUspecialBlackops 1 week ago
the unnatural argument goes out the window with that.
TheShakty1 1 week ago
This guy is missing the point marriage is also a legal contract that grants specific duties and privilegies to both parts entering into the agreement.
dgracey01 1 week ago
Comment removed
Astr0wave 1 week ago
That guy's grasping at straws.
TolaMacarino 2 weeks ago
"You want to be in a...legally recognized relationship."
"So you're after some type of moral approval."
How is it even possible for a grown-ass adult to so spectacularly NOT GET IT, even when it is being explained to them in simple words?!
DanThePropMan 2 weeks ago
@DanThePropMan So many stupid people in the U.S. Texas seems to be a hot spot for them.
Antiks72 2 weeks ago
gays are so evil!
see how they show affection to eachother? so evil!
see how they love eachother? so evil!
see how they pay taxes, do their jobs and live good happy lives? so evil!
praise the Lol'd!
DemoraX 2 weeks ago 26
@DemoraX like a BOSS
MegaloJoker 2 weeks ago
@DemoraX now that is what i call a good comment! like it.
deinemutter269 2 weeks ago
@DemoraX Dont forget thye also victimize themselves and want special treatment because they feel the world owes them something. So that kinna defeats the whole equal rights thing because equal rights means....equal rights.
TheGuinnessboys 12 hours ago
@TheGuinnessboys They "victimize" themselves because they ARE victims of constant unprovoked hatred and discrimination from both society, and the government. They don't think the world owes them any more than it owes you, they just want to be considered equals, and I'm sure they'd also appreciate not having to deal with the idiotic remarks they get on a daily basis from parochial simpletons like you. :P
drgnfrc13 11 hours ago
Marriage was originally a property agreement. One of the property is being the woman.
RivaWitch 2 weeks ago
This is what happens when you live in a trailer with only two channels on TV, one book [the bible] and have two ignorant drunk parents to guide you through life.
SuperDelusionist 2 weeks ago
"... It's Definetaly un natural, cause its scientific...." WOW.. this kind of sums it up folks!
SuperDelusionist 2 weeks ago 2
these people are unbelievable!!! people can do WHATEVER they want if what they are doing affects NO ONE except for the people involved, and these people themselves are usually POSITIVELY affected.
Because simple minded people are OFFENDED by things that DO NOT APPEAL to them based on their RELIGIOUS views is no reason to dem these things MORALLY WRONG. These people themselves are morally twisted!!
SuperDelusionist 2 weeks ago
it's unnatural because it's scientific... interesting...
b1rdn05 2 weeks ago
nature as a scientific concept is defined as everything that exists in the realm of reality. I don't know why people insist that if something is man made it's stops being natural. If a bird builds a nest it's nature, but if a man builds a house it's artificial. I don't get it.
azur0x 2 weeks ago
@azur0x sure you do, it is THEY who think this that DO NOT GET IT :P
SuperDelusionist 2 weeks ago
Why am i living in this world?
Alanadoredor 2 weeks ago
@Alanadoredor BECAUSE GOD MADE YOU!!!!!
just kiddin, it was just the right sperm with the right egg, pure luck friend you were screwed
azur0x 2 weeks ago
@azur0x I wish I was a monkey then I wouldn't be bothered by all these deluded people...I could just throw my poop at them...
Alanadoredor 2 weeks ago
@Alanadoredor because god hates you.
SuperDelusionist 2 weeks ago
Traditional Biblical marriage is defined as: 1 man + 1 woman, 1 man + many women (including wives, slaves, and concubines), 1 man + any woman that he raped, 1 man + any woman he captured in battle, 1 man + 1 prostitute he happens across.
Akira625 2 weeks ago
You only need to refer to one single phrase in this caller's argument to realize he's a MORON: "it's definitely unnatural because it's scientific". Once he says that, he removes all doubt that he's a mindless, science-hating, brainwashed theist nutcase.
leisulin 2 weeks ago
What a unbelievable prejudice ass this caller is.
1991stratplus 2 weeks ago 6
@1991stratplus RELIGION, AIN'T IT GRAND!
SuperDelusionist 2 weeks ago
This marriage shit is easy, all it means THESE DAYS is way to express life long commitment to a person and make it legally recognized. Anyone has a right to do that with whoever they want, however it's also the right of the religions to deny taking part in the ceremony, religion is a club, they can make the rules whatever they want so they can be exclusive like that. It's not just gays, they do this to straight people in certain circumstances too.
guyverdio 3 weeks ago
He thinks he's special for having a heterosexual marriage and giving birth to his heterosexual offspring who will probably end up in prison from the way his parents teach and having homosexual intercourse with his cellmates...But the only fertal kids he'll be having is the premature ones leaking out of his ass.
HxCDeathMetalHead 3 weeks ago
herpy derpy derp
MrAlqa3da 3 weeks ago
religous people just aren't very bright.
funcpl2741054 3 weeks ago 6
@funcpl2741054 - "You ever notice that everyone who believes in creationism looks really unevolved? Eyes real close together, big furry hands and feet. "I believe God created me in one day." Yeah, looks like he rushed it." -Bill Hicks
facepalmization 2 weeks ago
@funcpl2741054 in fact they are very damn retarded
Danovio 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yeah, If the lesbian woman in this video wants to have kids with HER WIFE/HUSBAND ?... they can...and if it turns out to be a boy on ultrasound they can eliminate that one and keep trying until they have a little girl. I'm sure they are FOR "abortion on demand". I mean what's to stop them, they have NO GOD, no REAL moral blockades.Morals without God are what YOU say they are.That's the whole point, not having to answer to a higher power, whom you don't believe in to begin with, so NO problem.
ydnar0591 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
ydnar0591 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
ydnar0591 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
ydnar0591 3 weeks ago
Wow. I didn't know Jen was a lesbian. That's kind of hot. I'm suddenly attracted to her.
Hanahleia 3 weeks ago 3
Wait, it's unnatural because it's scientific? So, get the fuck off the phone, that's scientific, drop it quickly before you catch the KNOWLEDGE!
extragunbon 3 weeks ago 46
@extragunbon
yeah. he lost his knowledge card with that remark since science is how nature is explained
infernalone666 1 week ago
Love how all the callers are form texas.
tcfizz555 3 weeks ago
@tcfizz555 Well, it is broadcasted from Texas
Christmasgoat 3 weeks ago
@Christmasgoat Yeah I ust realised that ;) duh
tcfizz555 3 weeks ago
@Christmasgoat Yeah I ust realised that ;) duh
tcfizz555 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Christmasgoat Yeah I ust realised that ;) duh
tcfizz555 3 weeks ago
@tcfizz555 im an atheist, born and raised in texas. One of the FEW. Though i didnt come out till after i left texas. And then i didnt start announcing it and defending my disbeliefs when i left the country for a couple years.
trashbash2001 3 weeks ago 2
"It's obviously unnatural because it's scientific." I want some of the stuff this guy was smoking.
WolfVisser1 4 weeks ago
@WolfVisser1 haha yeah
MilesBennettDysonZ 3 weeks ago
how do two lesbian women decide who carries the child, thats gotta be an awkward conversation
Zinsane1 4 weeks ago 2
Brothers and sisters and uncles and grandmas and grandpas. HAHAHAAHHAAHAH!!!!!
kingbridgetroll 4 weeks ago 21
I love stupid people.
They make toddlers look smart. : )
QuestionRenee 4 weeks ago
the purpose of marriage to me is a lot more than just to raise children. Love is involved here. i hope this guy isn't married. his wife(according to him) is nothing but a baby machine. what an ignorant jackass.
wigglesworth19 4 weeks ago
Oh my god this caller hurts my brain
NeroBaelside13 4 weeks ago
Blimey, what obstinate drivel the caller emits... -_-
MCAMVP 4 weeks ago
This caller is obviously ignorant. He made no valid point, and clearly hadn't really thought it out at all. This is the problem with the anti-gay marriage side. It's all about sex, and morality from a biblical standpoint. It's also mainly christians here in the US that are against gay marriage, and according to many I talk to they say they are not bound by the old testament due to jesus's sacrifice, but then cling to it on the subject of gay marriage. Don't they see this contradiction?
InteGrayting2 4 weeks ago
Anybody who can say that marriage is really just self-gratifying must have never been married before, lol
RaveriusMax 1 month ago
2:43 "Definitely not natural because it's scientific" Well, given that science is the branch that studies the nature of reality and nature being included into reality...
maximemeis111 1 month ago
SHE HAS A SON WITH TWO MOMS? GONNA BE A FAG FOR SURE. GAY PEOPLE ARGUE WELL, BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO. NOTHING MORALLY SOUND ABOUT GAY ADOPTIONS, CONCEPTIONS THROUGH AID, OR A PARENT BRINGING SAME SEX PARTNERS INTO THE HOUSE. ALSO SHE SAID SHE WANTED A LEGAL SITUATION. THAT IS FINE BUT CHILDREN ARE IN DANGER OF SWINGING THE WRONG WAY. IT IS UNHOLY. THAT IS THE BASIS OF ALL THESE ARGUMENTS.
deboles 1 month ago
@deboles Jesus had two dads, and he came out alright.
elspoko 1 month ago
@elspoko HAHA. THEY WERENT SLEEPING TOGETHER SMARTASS.
deboles 1 month ago
@deboles How do you know that? God is invisible dumbass.
elspoko 1 month ago
@deboles I TYPE IN ALL CAPS SO PEOPLE KNOW I'M SERIOUS!
JamesHLanier 3 weeks ago
@JamesHLanier I TYPE IN ALL CAPS CAUSE IM HALF BLIND. PLUS MY IMAC IS HOOKED UP TO MY TV. HAVE TROUBLE DETERMINING PROPER DISTANCE. I THINK INTERNET ETIQUETTE IS FOR ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL REASONS ANYHOW...
deboles 3 weeks ago
@deboles I would suggest getting glasses.
JamesHLanier 3 weeks ago
@deboles - I would suggest a bigger screen og better glasses, or a braille-unit then. Caps Lock is like shouting, you wouldn't stand in the middle of a grocery store shouting at the top of your lungs, even if you have disabilities. It's rude to shout, and nobody cares about your eyesight.
facepalmization 2 weeks ago
@deboles
If you're serious (it's hard to tell when people say really ignorant shit whether they're joking or trolling or, hard to imagine, really THAT ignorant), homosexuality isn't communicable. It's not like a disease. Children don't get swayed one way or the other and then choose to be gay. It doesn't work that way.
leisulin 2 weeks ago
@leisulin sure it does, but only if you have half a brain and are an idiot. there are alot of idiots around.
SuperDelusionist 2 weeks ago
Being gay is a sin,
Sheldon Cooper from the Big Bang theory is Gay in real life.
Magneto from X-men is Gay in real life.
l'm teaming up with the Devil on this one. God can go fuck himself.
Pentagon1337 1 month ago
Hmm while there may be additional footage for this video that explains in more detail the circular logic here, I don't see how the caller's issue was answered by the hosts. At the end he stated that Gay couples want more adoption rights through marriage. How was he incorrect?
Also it seemed his major claim was the ideal couple for bringing up a child is a male/female duo. So, putting these two together is his opinion: Gay couples would be bad for a child. No studies prove either position. So???
btpowel2 1 month ago
Who cares if he doesn't see the point anyways? Laws and constitutions are made precisely to prevent bigoted assholes like this guy from trampling over other people's basic rights. Heck, the gay community shouldn't even have to fight this absurd battle to get social acknowledgement of their basic rights in the first place.
He can have negative opinions on gay people if he wants, but from there to limiting their rights only because of prejudice and primitive supertition is just stupid.
hellhammerz666 1 month ago
Nobody else will have to deal with it but the kid, And you do not know how it will effect the child, Mentally, Spiritually or physically. Morality is gone when immorality is out of nowhere stuffed in the general public's face. in every body's face Your child!. Nobody can force Christianity upon anybody. What makes people think you can just stuff corruption in every body's face Without some kind of war?Cross the line, But with time your aging flesh will lead you to truth. Sincerely-- AJS.
Damienelite 1 month ago
@Damienelite Damien, this is your father! Your father and I have told you not to comment on this subject anymore. Now watch me lay into your god given right as a natural son and turn your view upside down on what is good and pure, Oh and right. oh and by the way, Is your little buddy tony coming to stay the night tonight? You need to play like a little boy, Just like daddy and I taught you. GO CALL HIM!
Damienelite 1 month ago
What's funny about deboles is that he just keeps referring back to the Bible when ranting against homosexuality, even though no atheist would take the Bible at its word (I for one think it's a terrible, immoral book). Furthermore, if the Bible is the only reason to oppose gay marriage, then the opponents have already lost, given that the US is a secular republic, with a constitution that never mentions god and explicitly separates church and state.
ianat841 1 month ago
I CAN USE CAPS TOO!
Xellith 1 month ago
So much easier when the callers own themselves...
jcgadfly 1 month ago
The guys said "It's unnatural because it's scientific"!!!!! Dude's a lost cause!
nontrainspotter 1 month ago
This caller is a piece of shit. What a fuckin tool
wisebrad15 1 month ago
I don't understand why anyone, gay or straight, would want to get married in the first place.
KuatoFilms 1 month ago
'Sin' is a made up word for people without brains.
funcpl2741054 1 month ago
@funcpl2741054 REALLY? SO WHAT IS THE WORD FOR DOING WHATEVER YOU WANT WITHOUT REGARD OF CONSEQUENCE? OOOH I GOT IT! DESTRUCTIVE. SIN IS SIN. ITS A DAMNED NOUN. SYNONYMOUS WITH MORONIC IN MY BOOK...
deboles 1 month ago
What the caller is trying to sat is, as a Christian, he knows homosexuality is morally wrong. now, the purpose of marriage is to glorify God. That is the only true purpose. Homosexuals cannot glorify God. They can be good, and have faith, blah, blah, blah, but homosexuality is a sin. In honesty, homosexuals would not live very long if Jesus had not given us the Golden rule. The Old Testament laws are more harsh for sinners. Yes GAYS= sinners. The state laws allow civil unions, but its sin.
deboles 1 month ago
@deboles Cute.
Now present an argument that can hold water.
Nepycros 1 month ago
@deboles So, if gays are sinners, then stoning children is okay? Your not allowed to nit pick here...
EdgyBroEDGY 1 month ago
@deboles According to your logic, eating shellfish is also a sin according to the Old Testament. Those who eat them cannot glorify God either.
Akira625 1 month ago
@Akira625 And don't forget people who wear clothing made of two different materials! They're SOL if they want to glorify God.
RevolverUnit 1 month ago
@Akira625 YEAH AND HOW DOES THAT MAKE EATING ASS OK? BOTH ARE WRONG ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE.
deboles 1 month ago
@deboles Okay, you just forfeited any sense of credibility with your all-caps tirades.
Akira625 1 month ago
@deboles Awwww! Your logic and understanding of the world is so cute! :)
KuatoFilms 1 month ago
@deboles That's all well and good. If you're a Christian who believes that, then I guess you should abstain from homosexual sex. However, I'm not a Christian. So I don't accept this premise of sin. Am I bound by your religion's rules?
backwoodsninja 1 month ago
@deboles I don't agree that homosexuality is morally wrong nor do I agree that marriage (a state contract) is intended to glorify god. You're going to need to back those assertions up.
ianat841 1 month ago
@ianat841 I REALLY DONT NEED TO. EVERY HUMAN ON EARTH KNOWS DICKS DONT GO IN ASSHOLES, AND THAT CUNNILINGUS IN GENERAL IS WRONG AND PERVERSE. SO IT MAKES YOU FEEL GOOD. ITS STILL PERVERSE. AMERICANS THINK EVERYTHING THEY "WANT" TO DO IS A DAMNED LIBERTY. WELL, CHURCH AND STATE ARE SEP. HOWEVR, THE STATE WANTS TO CONTROL PPULATION SO THEY INTERVENE IN ISSUES SUCH AS MARRIAGE AND COMMON-LAW MARRIAGE. IF NOT FOR THAT FOLLY, GAY MARRIAGE WOULD BE NON-EXISTANT. ALLOWING GOV'T IN DIVORCE AND MATRIMONY
deboles 1 month ago
@deboles ASK ANY HOMOSEXUAL THE PURPOSE OF SEX AND THEY WILL TELL YOU ITS REPRODUCTION-UNLESS YOU ASK A PERV. WHILE BEING GAY MAY OR MAY NOT "FEEL" WRONG, WE ALL KNOW IT IS. IF IT DONT FIT YOU MUST UM, QUIT!
deboles 1 month ago
@deboles BTW I dont know where to begin countering your statements. Its incredibly easy but there is so much to pick apart. I feel like a kid in a candy store.
Xellith 1 month ago
@deboles Really? Cause people have anal sex all the time. If it don't fit I must quit. Well then I should stop having sex with my girlfriend. And also retard separation of church and state is the an extremely good thing. Cause then we'd have you Adolf burning everyone that disagrees with you. STOP TYPING IN CAPS. I'm sure even if we could hear you we wouldn't care being you're just spewing out homophobic non-sense.
DJ100101 1 month ago
@DJ100101 YOU MUST BE A FAG. I TYPE IN CAPS BECAUSE I WANT TO. FUCK INTERNET ETIQUETTE. I GAVE MY OPINION AND YOU PROCEEDED TO USE NEGATIVE ADJECTIVES TOWARDS ME. IF THIS WAS IN PERSON I WOULDNT EVEN FUCKING TALK TO YOU. FUCK ALL YOU HONKEYS.
deboles 1 month ago
@deboles and... you're spammed.
dagda825 1 month ago in playlist gawd
@deboles Sir, I don't see the need for you to be bringing up my race. Second, I'm not gay. I have a girlfriend with whom I have had sex with many times. And yes mmm vagina feels great, but I still don't see the point of gays being discriminated. Oh and by the way, you gave your opinion and I offered mine as a an argument towards it. I'd say don't get your panties in a bunch but that'd be too gay for you.
DJ100101 1 month ago
@deboles Everyone who isn't a bigoted, close minded moron knows homosexuality isn't a choice. No reasonable human would choose to be treated the way you douchebags treat homosexuals. As the bible says, man is created in god's image. As such, your god is a "FAG."
Zero9656 1 month ago
@Zero9656 YUP. YOU ARE A FAG. JUST KIDDING. LETS BE SERIOUS. AND I DO APOLOGIZE, I WAS IN THE MOMENT WHEN I SAID THAT ON MY LAST POST. ANYWAYS, HOMOSEXUALITY "IS" A CHOICE. FEELINGS ARE NOT AND WE ARE ALL BORN WITH SEXUAL PREFERENCE. THE HARD TRUTH IS SEX IS A PART OF MARRIAGE. WE AS HUMANS ARE SO PERVERTED-THERE IS NO TELLING HOW BADLY HOMOSEXUALITY HAS BECOME IN OUR COMMUNITIES. ON ONE HAND, GAYS ARE EQUAL, BUT AT AN APEX, HOMOSEXUALITY CAN DECIMATE THE HUMAN RACE. WHAT YOU THINK?
deboles 1 month ago
@deboles I stopped reading after "HOMOSEXUALITY "IS" A CHOICE." and "WE ARE ALL BORN WITH SEXUAL PREFERENCE." Make up your mind, moron.
Zero9656 1 month ago
@Zero9656 MY MIND IS FINE FAGGOT. JUST BECAUSE YOU WANT SOME ASS, DOESNT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO GET SOME. GO KILL YOURSELF AND PLEASE STOP WRITING ME. PEOPLE WILL THINK IM GAY TOO. MORON.
deboles 1 month ago
@deboles LOL You don't even realize why your comment is retarded.
As for your gayness, it's too late. No one argues this vehemently against gay marriage unless they're pissed off about their homosexuality. It's okay, though. The bible was written by men, not god. So, the only people who are going to hate you are your fellow ignorant, bible thumping morons.
Zero9656 1 month ago
@Zero9656 YOUR MIND IS CLOSED. YOUR ASSHOLLE IS WIDE OPEN THOUGH SISSYBOY.
deboles 1 month ago
@deboles WHY DO YOU KEEP TALKING WITH CAPS LOCK? ARE YOU AN ATTENTION WHORE OR DID YOU FORGET HOW TO TURN IT OFF AGAIN?
theElectr0ne 1 month ago
@theElectr0ne LOL NO IM A DIABETIC MAN. I HAVE TO SEE THE LETTERS. GOT TIRED OF STRAINING MY EYES. INTERNET ETIQUETTE IS STUPID ANYWAYS.
deboles 1 month ago
@deboles IOW, MY EYESIGHT IS FADING...
deboles 1 month ago
@deboles
I think you're just a troll. Before you said you typed in all caps cuz you were "half blind"....now you say "fuck internet etiquette"...you're just an asshole, plain and simple. Go away.
leisulin 2 weeks ago
@deboles
Um, you haven't backed up your assertion that gay marriage is wrong, you just ranted incoherently. If this is the best you can do, no wonder 50% of the US population now thinks gay marriage should be legal (and 71% of college freshman think so). The opponents of gay marriage have no arguments.
ianat841 1 month ago
@deboles
What, you became half-blind within the last 3 weeks? What happened? To answer your points: he THINKS homosexuality is morally wrong, but HE is wrong, it's not. The purpose of marriage is NOT to glorify god. Right, homosexuals cannot glorify god, because god doesn't exist. Homosexuality is not a sin. Furthermore, sin doesn't exist. Golden rule sentence: yeah, "moral" christians would murder them, right? Is THAT morally right? It's moral to murder, but not to be gay?
leisulin 2 weeks ago
The host misses a very big counterpoint to the caller's argument. Adoption. If the caller's point is that gays shouldn't marry because they cannot naturally produce children, then how are straight couples allowed to adopt children?
didjargo 1 month ago
this caller is a freckin dipshit!
Tudor1886 1 month ago
@HelFKiernan that's what's tragic about how strongly an ideology can influence rational thinking.
herpderpmonkey 1 month ago
People are so fucking braindead. I can't stand the callers that call this show.
Kuhnfuze 1 month ago
@HelFKiernan i could care less on marriage as its not needed for a continuation of the species i would say it goes against nature a defect to be bi is surely more logic as we atheists go for as it would still insure the race this is ofcourse solved by adoption and is in fact better as instead of bringing a new life we are saving one already here thus making our world a better place that aside you can't say that being strictly gay does not go against nature? no offence just curious on thought
TheMoogle42 1 month ago
I swear this caller sounds like someone from South Park.
Quierame407 1 month ago in playlist Watch Later
"I don't really see the point."
So that's a reason to make it illegal? I don't see the point of drinking diet soda. THROW THE DIET-SODA DRINKERS IN JAIL!
GuacamoleKun 1 month ago 27
Don't like same sex marriage? Don't have one. Simple.
Symos 1 month ago
Go you, Jen Peeples!!
HiDeguild 1 month ago
Marriage has never been about raising children. It's in fact existed long before religion came into the picture and fucked everything up. It originally signified that a couple would be devoted to each other for the rest of their lives, and then religion came in and asserted its own bigoted views
lonesoldier33 1 month ago