@cronus75 That class of vehicle is basically an armored bus and should be judged by that standard, not by the standard of tanks or infantry fighting vehicles.
I can tell by the lack of movement on the cannon that it does not have a gyroscopic stabilizer.....that means it has to stop..then aim..then Fire....all modern tanks can shoot and scoot.....I don't think this weapon system would do very well in combat .
Cubans putted a 73mm gun from the BMP-1 and 2 AT-3 Saggers on a BTR-60... they also putted modified turret with a 100mm gun from a T-55 on a BTR-70 :O
Well, it would have been cool to use these sounds in a ArmA 2 soundmod but since SOMEONE added some prodigy to this, no-one can use these othervice awesome sounds.
@abraqadabra so the primary weapon is the Shipunov 2A42 30mm auto cannon secondary is the 23 auto cannon but who is the producer i know zu-23-2 but this is a twin barreled aircraft cannon... can you help me out?
@vfeonov не только для испытаний это сделано.Но и для экспорта.Приличное количесто стран используют БТР-60.Такие страны могут подписать контракт на модернизацию этой техники.
I don't see how you could clear a stoppage or remediate a malfunction on that vehicle without having to get out and climb on top of the vehicle. Other than that, pretty cool.
Incredible firepower! with right armor improvements it can be back in service however weve got our Rosomak's alreadry but that might be smth for export :)
everything fine but the armour on those things is funny. there's a reason why they werent mounting bigger weapons on the original... it wasn't meant to fight anything that would need those weapons.
in any real combat scenario this vehicle will be fucked long before it'll make any use of this firepower(unless its better armored ofcourse). the project? it's one of the better modernisations i ever seen:)
@vgotnofingers BTR is an analogue of the M-113. He gives the M-113 capacity and security of the crew.
However, superior to patency. Since it is easier to M-113. In the event of war with Russia M-113 would have just got stuck on Russian roads. And in the mountains of Afghanistan or Chechnya heavy M-113 would turn on the first corner. In addition, M-113 does not have the protection of radiation. It is unclear how the Americans planned to use it in case of nuclear war.
@VWP1976 no, it's not similar to m113 although it more or less from the era - it's a bad comparison anyways since m113 is a real piece of shit while btr is a pretty good (or rather was back then) wheeled transporter. you mess up the concepts: bmp was meant to follow tanks and fight - btr was meant to only safely transport troops (these got into one bag in 90s so many people got confused) like a sort of armored truck - hence only a machinegun in the turret. i'm not sure about the mobility though.
@vgotnofingersBTR and BMP will still have to participate in hostilities. They did not get to play the role of a taxi for the infantry.The same applies to M-113. Because of this, he had a permanent loss of commanders who did not have towers. And the same is true of Stryker. He made too secure. And the result is too heavy, large and vulnerable
@vgotnofingers Странно для поляка говорить что-то хорошее о российском оружии. :) It is strange for a Pole to say something good about Russia's weapons. :)
@VWP1976 why? do my folks normally spit shit? heh he. no worries dude, i'm one of the easy ones:) besides you guys have a separate philosophy of waging wars and many people judge russian weapons against their own military doctrine, which is bullshit. that it has four wheels doesn't make it the same kind of vehicle.
theory one thing, practice another - you make a truck and it ends facing tanks. shit happens eh?
@cuteshadowKIA BTR is an analogue of the M-113. He gives the M-113 capacity and security of the crew.
However, superior to patency. Since it is easier to M-113. In the event of war with Russia M-113 would have just got stuck on Russian roads. And in the mountains of Afghanistan or Chechnya heavy M-113 would turn on the first corner. In addition, M-113 does not have the protection of radiation. It is unclear how the Americans planned to use it in case of nuclear war.
Although I'm sure it would probably add to the weight, is there a version of this turret that can mount one or more antitank missiles in addition to the other armament? If it could, that'd be perfect. It would have suitable armament for most types of engagements.
Nah tanks are still better... if you planning on rolling out into a whole mob of them anyways. BRDM's might just tip with all the bodies piling up. But distance wise these are better.
Everything. BTR-90 is entirely new vehicle. Armour, weapons, hull layout, troop compartment, engine... I remember all details, but it would take just too long to list. Look up on wikipedia, they have extensive articles about both of BTRs.
Awesome. For some reason, I feel like I could watch armored vehicles drive around and shoot all day. You know how some people feel relaxed from looking at a waterfall or something? Armored vehicles have that effect on me.
A little overstated wouldn't you say? Get a girlfriend snuffer, or even rub one out. Point is you are spending too much time on youtube if you consider this orgasmic level. Just watch how your sister jacks off your dad.
I wonder,does this model still have 2x GAZ 53 engines,which are tuned, a Supe-MAZ engine (tuned KaMAZ engine) or anything new.I dare to say,does it have the JAMZ-238HD as the mammoth truck Kraz and the mobile artillery "Gvozdika"
There is very little improvement in terms of survivability; anything bigger than 7.62mm can penetrate the hull, and the petrol engine will caught fire easily if anything happen, that is why most military vehicle around the world utilizing diesel fuel.
Anyway I am impressed with the firepower, it has been improved significantly. Although for me the original 14.5mm KPVT is powerful enough for such class of vehicle, at least the KPVT can penetrate the LAV (without module add-on armour).
Most Russian trucks and machines use petrol,because they are intended to use in extreme conditions,like in Siberia,which is very cold.GAZ-53 truck for example,can start easily,even in -30 degrees,if the carburetor is tuned just right.
Afghanistan and Chechnya showed that KPVT is good, but yet not enough to effectively suppress typical reinforced guerilla ambush positions in mountains or urban environment.
wow, id love to see what just one shot would do to a person, that is some massive firepower (from what it looks like) its moving the truck back from the recoil!
I hate when people add music to videos like this. this is supposed to be about weapons fire so why the fuck is this stupid ass music fucking up what would have otherwise been a good video.
No way in hell would get the BTR-60, not even for $100. You can haul ass in it but it's hell trying to load or unload! Sticks military wise and stinks as a truck. Unless you put a door in the ass then maybe....
your grammar is terrible but i'm guessing you're trying to imply that you wouldn't use BTR
what you gotta remember is that this vehicle was considered top quality, and could be made in quantity as well, back in the cold war. besides if you compared this and the BMP 1/2 to the american M113 which was used at the time the BTR was also in full production and use, the BTR was loads better
I don't know about that, but because you have to climb on the side of the vehicle to get in, you are a sitting duck for the enemy. It's just a hassle. It carries 16, which I love, but getting in and out is just a hassle.
you're going to be a sitting duck trying to dismount from any kind of vehicle it's uncomfortable in any kind of an APC anyway so i don't think the soldiers would be crying
and it was a Top quality vehicle back in the cold war era. that's when this was used... it was a much better build than the American M113 which was the most used APC for the western countrys. the BTR had more firepower, held more men, was faster, broke down less, and commonly a much stronger gun. the m113 had more varients tho
Held more men? Except for the the 60, the rest held 7 men...... a full squad in some countries, but less still. How's the space inside? And do you know why they chose to put the engine in the back?
in most vehicles the engine is in the back, usually this is different usually in APC's but the Russians chose not to.
7 men are usually placed inside of an APC in western countrys due to the tactic of using APC fire teams. 3 men in "fire support" 4 men in the "rifle support" and the APC is the last fire team.
but we must compare russian tactics to western tactics. the russians had a much larger army than us, so they would want to get more men into a single vehicle to overrun us.
Well yea, exactly, if the Russians wanted to put more men into a vehicle, why would they replace the 60s w/ 7 seaters? I don't know how big Soviet squads were but their tactics was to overwhelm by number.... just doesn't make sense to make a 7 seater, although people do say that it is very spacious...... again not Soviet like......
well the BTR was also made to be an amphibious vehicle, so i'd think they're want it too hold as many people as possible, it wasn't commonly used as that, but i know for a fact that there weren't alot of amphibious vehicles so you'd want to get as many in one as possible.
Another reason, is that the BTR was created very soon after WW2, and even at post WW2, halftracks were still used, and the BTR's complete idea was off of them, and most Halftracks carry about 15 people. standardization i guess
At once it is visible that served in army somebody inside sat to that-that one hit RPG and all were lost during the Chechen war all went from above by the reservation, inside put wounded men. About survivability an armored troop-carrier, БМП cars 5 holes from RPG-7 sometimes came and nevertheless they reached to terrible
Engine here simply terror-moody
ponoroman 2 weeks ago
I'll take one. THhe 30mm cannon is PERFECT for traffic. LOL!!!!
UrbanTiger74 1 month ago
i wonder what happens when a 30mm shell penatrates the human skull or even the victims boddy someone enlighten me please..
789joshi 2 months ago
@789joshi
if you want to know that type in dead iraqi insurgents on Google....i believe they have 50.cal kills....just upscale it worse.
warriorofsteel01 1 month ago
@789joshi Well, it pretty much takes off your head..
hellcatdave1 2 weeks ago
God Bless COD
saledin2011 2 months ago
I WANT TO TOTTALY FUCK THAT THING IN THE BULLET HOLE. GOD BLESS COD.
DBabyNinetyOne91 2 months ago
@DBabyNinetyOne91 Dude, Call of Shit has nothing to do with this.
hellcatdave1 2 weeks ago
Would be great to have for the upcoming war with the machines.
imh11621 2 months ago
30mm cannon pierces a plate 30 mm .... that is why it is called 30mm?
fabriciobrisola1 2 months ago
@fabriciobrisola1 30mm is the inside diameter of the barrel.
SAsgarters 2 months ago
useless light armor against rpg...even armor piercer 7.62mm round can penetrate this useless box.
cronus75 3 months ago
@cronus75 That class of vehicle is basically an armored bus and should be judged by that standard, not by the standard of tanks or infantry fighting vehicles.
SAsgarters 2 months ago
im trying to remember that damn song. i cant remember if it was on Hackers, Gone in 60 seconds or SwordFish. damn.
cool vid though
chrisfur2 3 months ago
better btr 90 sure !
TATARSTAN59500 4 months ago
that 30mm pushes the whole fuckin vehicle backwards when it goes off.
WWS2286 4 months ago
good,,
ILHAMMAULIDAN 5 months ago
Perfect for suppressing civil disturbances. Go Syria!
shatchett0 5 months ago
apache gun
psifactor12 5 months ago
@psifactor12 It's not.
SAsgarters 2 months ago
@SAsgarters but its a 30mm .caliber is the same.
psifactor12 2 months ago
@psifactor12 The diameter of the barrel is the same, but the case that holds the propellant isn't, the projectile isn't and the gun itself isn't.
SAsgarters 2 months ago
I can tell by the lack of movement on the cannon that it does not have a gyroscopic stabilizer.....that means it has to stop..then aim..then Fire....all modern tanks can shoot and scoot.....I don't think this weapon system would do very well in combat .
rayvonne0067 5 months ago
usar en caso de zombies!!! :D
hks13906 5 months ago
Новые зубы для техники - пенсионера . Старая гвардия снова в бой .
trofim1881 6 months ago
романтично ... цветочки, лютики :)
AlexeySamara 6 months ago
Cubans putted a 73mm gun from the BMP-1 and 2 AT-3 Saggers on a BTR-60... they also putted modified turret with a 100mm gun from a T-55 on a BTR-70 :O
zerocker45 6 months ago
great video. annoying music. The footage is good enough to stand up on it's own without having to rely on some cheesy night club soundtrack
Shagfoot 6 months ago
LEWIS GUN MY ASS
locoawise 7 months ago
mean burst at 0:33 nice
30053493 7 months ago
Comment removed
30053493 7 months ago
best place ever to fire any weapons is definitely in a forest! love that echo after every round
30053493 7 months ago
Stryker is better but the new BTR is very nice and probably much more affordable.
Cennedi 7 months ago
@Cennedi A single stryker is most likely better than a single BTR, but the same could be said about single german and russian WWII tanks.
KornSarum 7 months ago
does they have sth to stabelise thier barrels while on the move? cause that going to be super cool :)
polvereoro86 7 months ago
We want the REAL sound without music!!!!!!
Without the music can be used for upgrading the sound in some games like DCS-Black Shark or ARMA2
flanker0ne 8 months ago
When it fired the smoke I was expecting lag. Then I realized this isn't ARMA2
masonkiller666 8 months ago
Shame this and similar vehicles suffer that extra 1/3-1/2 height added on to the roofline.... If your threat environment allows it - looks capable.
than357 8 months ago
I'd like to go to school with it
subzero92MK 8 months ago
Great job totally fucking up your video with the music
lmos26 8 months ago
fucking prodigy !!!!
delphi88 8 months ago
Таким видео музыка ненужна
Sieg3000gt 8 months ago
eventhough its old still looks deadly to infantry....
Godlike0503 8 months ago
Props for not using anything from the 009 Sound System or Drowning Pool's song Bodies.
Not kidding here. Thank you for not using them.
MiamiTom1 9 months ago
good but loose the music bro
TheFunkhouser 9 months ago
an automatic grenade launcher is always nice to have!
AllisterCaine 10 months ago
can this destroy a tank ?
Newbpwng 10 months ago
@Newbpwng with armor piercing it will definitely have a good crack at it!
30053493 9 months ago
прикольно
19DeneD95 11 months ago
HAAAA Really cool vid. But it is surprising how the cubans have a T55 Cannon on one of those and a KPV AA gun.
zerocker45 11 months ago
Great vid mate, but very stupid idea to have music playing too...Seriously, why?!
Ruined an otherwise perfect clip of some devestating firepower with a very old and over-used (though i'll admit, good) song.
Next time can you at least release two versions?
Itdoesntreallymattah 11 months ago
Well, it would have been cool to use these sounds in a ArmA 2 soundmod but since SOMEONE added some prodigy to this, no-one can use these othervice awesome sounds.
metsapeikkoo 1 year ago
thats a fucking cannon
harveydog2006 1 year ago
Now for sale at your local supermarket for ww3!
snipermakedonski 1 year ago
Кончил!
4ILDAR 1 year ago
TURN OFF MUSIC IN THIS VIDEO. I WANT HEAR SUBJECT'S SOUND NOT PRODIGY
anonfromrashka 1 year ago 50
@anonfromrashka it''s ok dude, the prodigy are totally outclassed by the cannon voice)
abraqadabra 1 year ago 20
@abraqadabra so the primary weapon is the Shipunov 2A42 30mm auto cannon secondary is the 23 auto cannon but who is the producer i know zu-23-2 but this is a twin barreled aircraft cannon... can you help me out?
SARAJEVO1987HORDEZLA 11 months ago
@abraqadabra but still... and this vid has an incredible echo!!! A must-hear!
AKAtheA 6 months ago
на 1:40 виден вращающий момент башни при стрельбе из АГС, надеюсь уже устранили этот косяк.
AlexanderA80 1 year ago
BTR= BRING THE RAPE!!!
AvengedZeppelin20 1 year ago
это просто новую башню испытывают - на шасси БТР - 60 ))) а поставят на новое шасси минимум 80.....на 1.52 - видна же надпись - ИСПЫТАНИЯ )))
vfeonov 1 year ago
это просто новую башню испытывают - на шасси БТР - 60 ))) а поставят на новое шасси минимум 80.....
vfeonov 1 year ago
@vfeonov не только для испытаний это сделано.Но и для экспорта.Приличное количесто стран используют БТР-60.Такие страны могут подписать контракт на модернизацию этой техники.
RUSRomanRUS 5 months ago
@RUSRomanRUS я с этим и не спорю) - универсальный боевой модуль - сейчас тенденция к универсальности нализо )
vfeonov 5 months ago
nice dont want to be in the receiving end
bonifacio2009 1 year ago
@bonifacio2009
That's what she said.
AvengedZeppelin20 1 year ago
hmmmm. beats a paint ball gun. cool
jmbeventphotography 1 year ago
OWN!
TbRemiX 1 year ago
It doesn't change the fact that while undeniably cool, these things are deathtraps when facing anyone armed with something more than small arms.
WASPfreak 1 year ago
@WASPfreak
if you got a big gun it wont matter, they all be dead before they can shoot back :P
karambiatos 11 months ago
SHIT! The gun is the shit man! its moving a 10 ton vehicle slightly backwards when firing, awesome!
sotemot 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this
isnt fake. apparently if u copy and paste this to tenpeople in the next
ten minutes u will have the best day of ur lifetomorrow. u will either
get kissed or asked out, if u break this chain uwill see a little dead
girl in ur room tonight.... in 53 mins someone will...say i love you or im
sorry or wanna go out...\............\...i will...
lilSinger4ev 1 year ago
One of these would totally fuck up a Gavin.
RUBIZEN 1 year ago
Wow BTR-60 and BRDM-2 these are classic oldies. Awesome to see them upgraded
evilcatears 1 year ago
What song is that playing?
ProfessorPathogen 1 year ago
@ProfessorPathogen Woodo peoples by Prodigy
cornel10 1 year ago
lol,i like it!
grasess 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
russians soldiers like eat human flesh in II world war,watch my video Cannibalism in russian army
marcelovesi73 1 year ago
That is a scary beast.
Inski584 1 year ago
Comment removed
dontmakemeMAD1990 1 year ago
@dontmakemeMAD1990 whait
stupid question
i just want to know the range(readed the description to late)
dontmakemeMAD1990 1 year ago
klass!
grasess 1 year ago 3
Damn a .50 cal, 5.56, and a full auto 40mm grenade launcher. How Much for BRDM???
xXSpyderKingXx 1 year ago
wanna hunt squirrels with it!!
Trexxxxer1 1 year ago
I don't see how you could clear a stoppage or remediate a malfunction on that vehicle without having to get out and climb on top of the vehicle. Other than that, pretty cool.
catdieselpowa 1 year ago
i have more like franch VBCI or finnish Patria
MyNameIsVedran 1 year ago
I want one dammit.
warriorofsteel01 1 year ago
is that legal?
shahe1500 1 year ago
Harika modernizasyon, rezalat BTR-60 ın ateş gücünü yükseltmiş
esattanoren 1 year ago
Music name?
berkut2006 1 year ago
@berkut2006 Prodigy - Voodoo People
crippleengine 1 year ago
@crippleengine
thnx :]
berkut2006 1 year ago
Incredible firepower! with right armor improvements it can be back in service however weve got our Rosomak's alreadry but that might be smth for export :)
Anarchizer 1 year ago
really nice video. 1/1
Signum94 1 year ago
the sound of shells falling scares me more shitless than the actual guns going off
Hitsulikeapunch 1 year ago
Chuck Norris penis ?
freddykisback123 1 year ago
at 1:07 is that the 23mm or the 14.5mm KPVT?
Guynumber7 1 year ago
@Guynumber7
A 23 mm auto-cannon , based on the re-barreled KPVT.
abraqadabra 1 year ago
Comment removed
xenomorphelv426 3 months ago
@Guynumber7 14.5mm judging by the smoke
ppitm 11 months ago
@Guynumber7 looKs liKe the KPVT
30053493 9 months ago
Nice!!!!
1048luca 1 year ago
everything fine but the armour on those things is funny. there's a reason why they werent mounting bigger weapons on the original... it wasn't meant to fight anything that would need those weapons.
in any real combat scenario this vehicle will be fucked long before it'll make any use of this firepower(unless its better armored ofcourse). the project? it's one of the better modernisations i ever seen:)
vgotnofingers 1 year ago
@vgotnofingers BTR is an analogue of the M-113. He gives the M-113 capacity and security of the crew.
However, superior to patency. Since it is easier to M-113. In the event of war with Russia M-113 would have just got stuck on Russian roads. And in the mountains of Afghanistan or Chechnya heavy M-113 would turn on the first corner. In addition, M-113 does not have the protection of radiation. It is unclear how the Americans planned to use it in case of nuclear war.
Analog Stryker - BTR-90.
VWP1976 1 year ago
@VWP1976 no, it's not similar to m113 although it more or less from the era - it's a bad comparison anyways since m113 is a real piece of shit while btr is a pretty good (or rather was back then) wheeled transporter. you mess up the concepts: bmp was meant to follow tanks and fight - btr was meant to only safely transport troops (these got into one bag in 90s so many people got confused) like a sort of armored truck - hence only a machinegun in the turret. i'm not sure about the mobility though.
vgotnofingers 1 year ago
@vgotnofingersBTR and BMP will still have to participate in hostilities. They did not get to play the role of a taxi for the infantry.The same applies to M-113. Because of this, he had a permanent loss of commanders who did not have towers. And the same is true of Stryker. He made too secure. And the result is too heavy, large and vulnerable
VWP1976 1 year ago
@vgotnofingers Странно для поляка говорить что-то хорошее о российском оружии. :) It is strange for a Pole to say something good about Russia's weapons. :)
VWP1976 1 year ago
@VWP1976 why? do my folks normally spit shit? heh he. no worries dude, i'm one of the easy ones:) besides you guys have a separate philosophy of waging wars and many people judge russian weapons against their own military doctrine, which is bullshit. that it has four wheels doesn't make it the same kind of vehicle.
theory one thing, practice another - you make a truck and it ends facing tanks. shit happens eh?
vgotnofingers 1 year ago
огневая мощь хорошая,но это до первого попадения РПГ вспоминаем чечню!!
DimISTrus 1 year ago
@DimISTrus Даже Абрамс с вероятностью в 70 процентов поражается из РПГ
А чтобы подбить Т-80, в него надо было попасть раз восемь.
VWP1976 1 year ago
BTR vs Bradly or Stryker = 1:0 even in looks, as in coolness
cuteshadowKIA 1 year ago
@cuteshadowKIA BTR is an analogue of the M-113. He gives the M-113 capacity and security of the crew.
However, superior to patency. Since it is easier to M-113. In the event of war with Russia M-113 would have just got stuck on Russian roads. And in the mountains of Afghanistan or Chechnya heavy M-113 would turn on the first corner. In addition, M-113 does not have the protection of radiation. It is unclear how the Americans planned to use it in case of nuclear war.
Analog Stryker - BTR-90.
VWP1976 1 year ago
overkill much> does it have to be that fast lol
kingkongblu 1 year ago
peoples ready to kill himself )))
fqdn1 1 year ago
The gsh-30 is used in the Mig-29 and the sukhoi's right
Starr8492DS 1 year ago
@Starr8492DS
GSh- 30 is not used on aircraft
TheVelyr 1 year ago
@TheVelyr srry i mean the gsh-301
Starr8492DS 1 year ago
@Starr8492DS
No problem. Russia in the complex system of marking weapons, often different weapons and equipment assigned to the same indexes.
TheVelyr 1 year ago
Although I'm sure it would probably add to the weight, is there a version of this turret that can mount one or more antitank missiles in addition to the other armament? If it could, that'd be perfect. It would have suitable armament for most types of engagements.
Schone23666 1 year ago
kick some ass with that shit
gypshasballs22 1 year ago
TURN OFF MUSIC FUCKING STUPID...
IF I WANT LISTEN MUSIC, I WILL TURN ON FUCKING WINAMP....retarde
volvofunclub 1 year ago
Nah tanks are still better... if you planning on rolling out into a whole mob of them anyways. BRDM's might just tip with all the bodies piling up. But distance wise these are better.
Minotaursoldier 1 year ago
Классная машина.
Inohodok 1 year ago 3
30мм пушка и агс , не завидую врагу.
goodgrunya 1 year ago 2
Ruskaia arujiia lu46aia v mire !
KINGIGOR1992 1 year ago
holy shit!
That gun throws back the entire damn Tank..
Denmarkforever1 1 year ago
@Denmarkforever1 Mother fuck !how to be holy shit?
think of when talking about something!
you stupid !
KINGIGOR1992 1 year ago
@KINGIGOR1992
It's an expression... Live with it...
Denmarkforever1 1 year ago
@Denmarkforever1 This expression is stupid & you stupid !no longer use !!!
KINGIGOR1992 1 year ago
@KINGIGOR1992 chill...
holy shit, holy fuck.. people use these expressions... what are you gonna do about it?
Denmarkforever1 1 year ago
@Denmarkforever1 God punishes you see that?
Twin buildings exploded , done tiracte, were disasters
earthquakes and hurricanes!
and even if the world is stupid
May you be smart and do not use !!!
KINGIGOR1992 1 year ago
@KINGIGOR1992
9/11 was pure human fault
do not blame god for all the humans miseries...
Denmarkforever1 1 year ago
am i the only one that knows thats a BTR-80A at the start?
BlackPython222 1 year ago
Are you sure? I think BTR-80 series doesn`t have exhaust pipes so exposed.
pashka1988 1 year ago
What's the difference between a modernized BTR-60 and a BTR-90? And is that the 30mm or 23mm autocannon?
ppitm 1 year ago
Everything. BTR-90 is entirely new vehicle. Armour, weapons, hull layout, troop compartment, engine... I remember all details, but it would take just too long to list. Look up on wikipedia, they have extensive articles about both of BTRs.
pashka1988 1 year ago
Awesome. For some reason, I feel like I could watch armored vehicles drive around and shoot all day. You know how some people feel relaxed from looking at a waterfall or something? Armored vehicles have that effect on me.
Irrenmann 1 year ago
lmao
tetrafin917 1 year ago
pure orgasm :X
snuffying 1 year ago 42
sad life
stevdsvegas 1 year ago
@stevdsvegas fuck you cock muncher !
snuffying 1 year ago 2
A little overstated wouldn't you say? Get a girlfriend snuffer, or even rub one out. Point is you are spending too much time on youtube if you consider this orgasmic level. Just watch how your sister jacks off your dad.
stevdsvegas 1 year ago
@stevdsvegas lol, it was a joke you dumb ass. i mean how the fuck can you have an orgasm like this . fucking hell man...
p.s. i hav no sister and no dad :)
snuffying 1 year ago
can i haz?
achen342 1 year ago 2
ich nehm 2
SuperMasterofdeath 2 years ago
the recoil of the gun pushes the vehicle back!! lol
zanespn 2 years ago 3
@zanespn
No need for a reverse, just fire a long burst at your neighbours house to back into the garage! XD
TheCrazyFinn 1 year ago
I wonder,does this model still have 2x GAZ 53 engines,which are tuned, a Supe-MAZ engine (tuned KaMAZ engine) or anything new.I dare to say,does it have the JAMZ-238HD as the mammoth truck Kraz and the mobile artillery "Gvozdika"
Henzzman 2 years ago
A pkt, 30mm, plus a 30mm AGL. well its got the styker beat. just pic your weapon you want to pop it with, that all.
Acclamator55 2 years ago 4
wht is da name of song:s it was soundtrack of ''WASABI''
1453madturk1453 2 years ago
Voodoo People - Prodigy
JebusJames 2 years ago
thanks ı learned ıt long time ago but still thx :D
1453madturk1453 2 years ago
mamamia, awsome gun xD
berkut2006 2 years ago
the ultimate thing to have when zombies attack :)
Bamchucknorris 2 years ago 75
Wow this is a pretty good Weapon for Troop protection.
deltaalpha21074 2 years ago
This model of BTR-60 still using two petrol engines?
alongthebluff 2 years ago
Well, we are still using gas powered cars so a much smaller ammount of BTR-60 and BRDM-2s shouldn't be a big deal.
tugfngjfuvj 2 years ago
the Hungarian ones have a V8 Kamaz Diesel engine
mumbojumbozigzag 2 years ago
no. one
natsplit 2 years ago
@alongthebluff Yes,two tuned GAZ-53 V8 engines.Although petrol,they can start very well under cold conditions and like the AK47,quite reliable.
Henzzman 2 years ago 2
There is very little improvement in terms of survivability; anything bigger than 7.62mm can penetrate the hull, and the petrol engine will caught fire easily if anything happen, that is why most military vehicle around the world utilizing diesel fuel.
Anyway I am impressed with the firepower, it has been improved significantly. Although for me the original 14.5mm KPVT is powerful enough for such class of vehicle, at least the KPVT can penetrate the LAV (without module add-on armour).
alongthebluff 2 years ago 2
Most Russian trucks and machines use petrol,because they are intended to use in extreme conditions,like in Siberia,which is very cold.GAZ-53 truck for example,can start easily,even in -30 degrees,if the carburetor is tuned just right.
Henzzman 2 years ago
Afghanistan and Chechnya showed that KPVT is good, but yet not enough to effectively suppress typical reinforced guerilla ambush positions in mountains or urban environment.
PKSnsk 2 years ago
This truck is good for police forces to prevent the terrorist!
racingsexy 2 years ago 2
wow, id love to see what just one shot would do to a person, that is some massive firepower (from what it looks like) its moving the truck back from the recoil!
greenwillywonka 2 years ago
haha, looks like truck nuts at 2:26.
tmaxxe 2 years ago
2:09... beautiful flowers amongst a lovely vehicle.
KillKyleWeiss 2 years ago
Glory to the Russian soldier
ZAZIvan 2 years ago
Cool. GO RUSSIA...
Sabarubin 2 years ago
I hate when people add music to videos like this. this is supposed to be about weapons fire so why the fuck is this stupid ass music fucking up what would have otherwise been a good video.
JonGarrett2010 2 years ago 3
Then fuck off if you don't like The Prodigy...
purpleravenstar 2 years ago
No way in hell would get the BTR-60, not even for $100. You can haul ass in it but it's hell trying to load or unload! Sticks military wise and stinks as a truck. Unless you put a door in the ass then maybe....
MingGuoLi 2 years ago
your grammar is terrible but i'm guessing you're trying to imply that you wouldn't use BTR
what you gotta remember is that this vehicle was considered top quality, and could be made in quantity as well, back in the cold war. besides if you compared this and the BMP 1/2 to the american M113 which was used at the time the BTR was also in full production and use, the BTR was loads better
KILOBify 2 years ago
Top quality? What do you mean? Better build?
I don't know about that, but because you have to climb on the side of the vehicle to get in, you are a sitting duck for the enemy. It's just a hassle. It carries 16, which I love, but getting in and out is just a hassle.
MingGuoLi 2 years ago
you're going to be a sitting duck trying to dismount from any kind of vehicle it's uncomfortable in any kind of an APC anyway so i don't think the soldiers would be crying
and it was a Top quality vehicle back in the cold war era. that's when this was used... it was a much better build than the American M113 which was the most used APC for the western countrys. the BTR had more firepower, held more men, was faster, broke down less, and commonly a much stronger gun. the m113 had more varients tho
KILOBify 2 years ago
Held more men? Except for the the 60, the rest held 7 men...... a full squad in some countries, but less still. How's the space inside? And do you know why they chose to put the engine in the back?
MingGuoLi 2 years ago
in most vehicles the engine is in the back, usually this is different usually in APC's but the Russians chose not to.
7 men are usually placed inside of an APC in western countrys due to the tactic of using APC fire teams. 3 men in "fire support" 4 men in the "rifle support" and the APC is the last fire team.
but we must compare russian tactics to western tactics. the russians had a much larger army than us, so they would want to get more men into a single vehicle to overrun us.
KILOBify 2 years ago
Well yea, exactly, if the Russians wanted to put more men into a vehicle, why would they replace the 60s w/ 7 seaters? I don't know how big Soviet squads were but their tactics was to overwhelm by number.... just doesn't make sense to make a 7 seater, although people do say that it is very spacious...... again not Soviet like......
MingGuoLi 2 years ago
well the BTR was also made to be an amphibious vehicle, so i'd think they're want it too hold as many people as possible, it wasn't commonly used as that, but i know for a fact that there weren't alot of amphibious vehicles so you'd want to get as many in one as possible.
Another reason, is that the BTR was created very soon after WW2, and even at post WW2, halftracks were still used, and the BTR's complete idea was off of them, and most Halftracks carry about 15 people. standardization i guess
KILOBify 2 years ago
At once it is visible that served in army somebody inside sat to that-that one hit RPG and all were lost during the Chechen war all went from above by the reservation, inside put wounded men. About survivability an armored troop-carrier, БМП cars 5 holes from RPG-7 sometimes came and nevertheless they reached to terrible
ZAZIvan 2 years ago