@AutumnSplendors "...Otherwise you are no less than a Pavlovian dog, aimlessly seeking the sensationalism ..."
I agree with ueks69. That statement is loaded with blind malice towards those who dare think differently than you. Just remember, DOG, that you will be judged with the same malevolence you acted with when you played judge.
@AutumnSplendors I'm glad your mother lived to a ripe old age, but I do not see what that has to do with a Jewish zombie!
Yahweh didn't put anyone anywhere, & if he really existed, I would advice you to stay away from it! It's an evil monster that pretends to create things, but in reality, only likes to destroy, torture, & hate!
1. get down on your knees and put your hands together.
2. close your eyes.
3. move your knuckles away from eachother, making a circle with both hands.
4. now open your mouth as if you are talking to god.
5. now think of what you are telling your children to do every night before bed.
6. if for some reason step 5 doesn't apply to you (because you're not retarded) lol at all the christians out there in the world tell their kids to suck invisible dick every night.
@AutumnSplendors Care to back that claim with some serius evidence ;)
Your proposition is a fallacy in itself.
If you truely believe that statement, your dumb and ignorant....If you wrote that statement to convey your innermost hatred of anyone not believing in your magical skydaddy, then your not very christian, but a liar. So which is it, liar or dumb and ignorant :)
The difference between the three Abrahamic religions: Christianity mumbling to the ceiling, Judaism mumbling to the wall, Islam mumbling to the floor.
I can respect your freedom to believe what you wish, but why knock others for their choice to believe something you don't? Why spend so much time bashing someone who thinks differently?
@TheAmazingCreative It's because the belief causes so much trouble and conflicy in the world and has been responsible for the repression, torture, and death of so many humans. It is an evil, selfish doctrine and should be fought against if humanity is to better itself. The further away we move from our religious books, the more civilised we become.
@TheAmazingCreative "Why spend so much time bashing someone who thinks differently?" Aside from demonstrating reciprocity towards the beliefs? Aside from the propagation of ignorance that is called for to maintain the beliefs? Aside from the detriment to not only the past but also the present condition of humanity that the beliefs enforce?
Or how about how this video only displays the fact, supported by evidence, that "faith" only gets someone so far before they cause massive harm?
@hdregmore 1) No it's not. Maybe some atheist do, but if you talk to any renown scientist, he/she will tell you that science is completely "agnostic" in the "god" question. 2) I know that scientific knowledge is not absolute, and I haven't claimed so. And it does not require faith, it requires evidence. 3) You didn't even address my point 4) Again, not answering my point 5) PERSONALLY, you said it yourself. To justify something you have to verify it in a way that is recognizable by everybody.
@kanmoreti Still counting laboriously huh? 1) Yes it is, just look at the videos and comments on atheist material on YT. 2) If it is not "absolute" then it requires faith to believe it will give us further answers. 3) You didn't read my answer 4) You STILL did not read my answer 5) So what is your point? Are personal experiences not real? 6) I am glad that you agree with your assumption being foolish.
@hdregmore 1) That is what I said. Atheists might use science for defending atheism, but science itself does not answer the god question. 2) Answer is continuously giving new answers to different question. One doesn't require faith to believe it will eventually give us more and more answers. 3) I said that science is testable (which is a fact), and then you said that science's assumptions are well documented, which is not true. 4) same
@kanmoreti 1) Okay that is what you were attempting to deny. Atheists use science to support their idea. 2) By your own admission science is answering questions while posing new ones. Your faith allows you to suggest further answers are knowable. 3) if you do not know of the basic assumptions of science then I suggest you look them up. 4) Same.
@hdregmore (cont..) 5) One might think that he/she has had a personal experience, but he/she might be mistaken and what happened to him/her might be completely natural. One can't trust the personal experience of other people. You should watch QualiaSoup's video that addresses this issue. 6) When someone commits a mistake, one has to admit it.
Really? You're comparing religion - where you can't test anything, to science - where everything has to be tested before it is accepted... and you're saying both have the same leap of faith?
This is a good video. Your others are not very good though. They are high quality productionwise but they aren't funny or don't have very good points (with few exceptions).
The difference between the three Abrahamic religions: Christianity mumbling to the ceiling, Judaism mumbling to the wall, Islam mumbling to the floor.
that point is, that the bible was originally written in a language other than English (Greek) so, to take the literal meaning of an English translation of the bible is to miss the point, because the Greek-English translation was far off from perfect, and quite a bit of meaning was lost
Doesn't a being threatening to send you to hell if you don't do what he says bear some responsibility to release another version of his supposed word in a context that people can understand? It wouldn't be difficult, he is all-powerful, after all.
King James? Srsly? The one with unicorns and stuff? And why do you read it? And not the Hebrew/Greek original?
The problem with the english Bible is that the greek original can be translated in so many ways. Take the gospel of John. It starts "In the beginning was the Word". You could also translate the greek as "In principle, there was reason".
But as one US teacher once said: If English was good enough for our Lord Jesus Chirst, it surely is good enough for everyone else. :D
The quote "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me," was from the GOVERNOR of Texas when discussing Spanish language classes in public schools.
Great quote! It shows the incredible Animal-Farm-esque tendency of the believer to rewrite history in accordance with their own willful ignorance.
And that on two levels: the history of their "holy book" and the history of their governance (Texas' constitution).
Nice piont about the Hebrew & Greek originals, lagerbaer :-)
A lot of the creationists agree that believing in god does require a leap of faith, but that not believing one requires just as large of one. The creationists are the ones that keep leaping away, while the atheists are the ones keeping their feet on the ground.
Actually, a good shepherd DOESN'T lay down their life for their sheep, because that makes it hard to shear them and milk them and kill them and eat them.
In fact, a good shepherd goes out of his way to NOT lay down his life for sheep that can be replaced.
There's a lot of things in the bible that are based on basic morals. In the New Testament. Not the Old Testament. Basically, the Old Testament is the evil part of the Bible.
"the Old Testament is the evil part of the Bible" -saiyajin
Jesus hasnt the slightest objection to the cruelties of the Old Testament. "Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest part or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place." (Matthew 5:17)
There is a scientific explanation of the origin of the universe that doesn't require a creator, so occam's razor implies that the existance of a creator god is unlikely because it's unnecessary.
Couple that with how unreliable the bible is (in order to believe it and keep your credibility, you need to say half of it is metaphorical at least) and the scientific record of miracles (thousands claimed, 0 proven) and you get a very low chance of the judeo-christian god existing.
Does that enter into it? my explanation is better than your explanation, has fewer holes, is more thoroughly tested, is supported by more evidence. It's more likely to be right.
The only kind of explanations you can be 100% sure of are mathematical/logical proofs, everything else is just a matter of what's more likely.
entropy, microwave background radiation, and universal expansion.
But why reject it? without it, there's no reason for the universe to have begun, and no need for a creator.
I have my evidence: The Bible. Although harshly bashed, thr Bible is true and just. Atheists take what the Bible says way out of porportion to promote their own bias views.
Well you obviously don't respect ours by coming to a Youtube video by a guy who makes athiest cartoons (obvious by his name) and putting up comments trying to prove your religion is right and our non belief is wrong.
this is my last comment related to this video. so, insult me if you want, I wont be around to read your ignorant comments, so screw all of you people, you're going to burn in hell regardless, so enjoy the pathetic life you currently have.
If you want to take some class to teach you creationism, fine. Do in on Sunday... at church. There is no way it should be taught in SCIENCE class. If it is taught, ALL creation theories should be taught, since public schools are open to people of all faiths. That would take a lot of time. You want religion? Go to church. You want to be educated? Go to school. There shouldn't be an overlap.
You can't claim you "mean good in doing so" while pushing "alternative creation god theory" forward as science to be taught to children in school... It's irresponsible and frankly offensive, what they will have learnt in those classes won't contribute in anyway useful towards the world, reason why science has gotten us this far in just over a century, it accurately describes and predicts how things behave, your theory on the other hand, could be true, but doesn't help us to advance in any way.
@Masterofxtreme93 It's not your right to put religion in schools. THAT IS NOT YOUR RIGHT. Get it through your thick fucking skull!!! I couldn't give a flying fuck if you mean well, I don't want you to spread your shit all over the textbooks. SORRY if that fucking offends you, but the constitution CLEARLY states that government and church be separate, you IDIOT. Oh, and if you REALLY wanted to put an alternative, and present all the ideas to let the kids choose, put in all the other religions too
Christianity should be taught only in "Mythology" class. Along with fairy stories, Greek and Roman myths, King Arthur and Star Wars. The students should be encouraged to compare the various myths, identifying similarities in the story structures and character-types involved.
(They would find that Jesus isn't the first fictional hero to be born of a virgin and to die heroically for the sake of mankind - and that's just for starters...)
That was what people believed back then. Also, it states the earth was round hundreds of years before science proved so. Will guys please stop attacking us? At least make a logical debate, and discontinue these demeaning videos. Ever occur to you that we are human too?
Didn't it specifically say it was circular? Could be wrong though. Also, the fact that they might have got one or two things right doesn't change the fact it got so much more wrong.
They got it all wrong. It was totally and completely misrepresented. It's like when Kent Hovind says "They believe we came from a rock!" It's a total misrepresentation of evolution. Somewhat true, but twisted around ridiculously.
no it isn't, that's the word of some guy 2,000 years ago, which was then edited by hundreds of people a few centuries afterwards, which was then translated to english.
The Golden Rule originated from the Bible. Do unto others as you would have them do to you.
Fairy tales? Read the Bible so you can understand that it is not a "fairy tale"
I believe in evolution. I believe that God created the micro-organisms that eventually evolved into humans. You don't think it all had to start from somewhere?
Check out the "References" section at the bottom of the page and go after it!
Yes. Technically, Wikipedia is not a 100% sure source for scientific information, that's why it cannot be used as reference in a homework at universities. That's correct.
But telling that a page - or generally pages you don't like - are products of "atheist propaganda" is a very brave claim.
Wikipedia is more likely to be true than false. Go after it if you don't believe.
I see that just because it does not verify your claims you will blame it on Wikipedia. No, actually you're just wrong. And just because it was written by atheists doesn't mean it is incorrect.
"I believe in evolution. I believe that God created the micro-organisms that eventually evolved into humans. You don't think it all had to start from somewhere?"
oh oh oh, that's rich. So your "loving god" allowed thousands upon thousands of generations of the evolutionary lines that eventually created us to exist merely as a catalyst for the creation of your god's perfect creation?
He murdered millions upon millions of our ancestors just to create us? How arrogant. What a bastard!
AHAHAHAHAHHA! Wait, that wasn't a joke? You seriously believe that a text (other than mathematical) can provide evidence for its correctness within itself?
i just looked up fowl in the dictionary: a gallinaceous bird kept chiefly for its eggs and flesh; a domestic cock or hen. • The domestic fowl is descended from the wild red junglefowl of Southeast Asia (see jungle fowl ).
• any other domesticated bird kept for its eggs or flesh, e.g., the turkey, duck, goose, and guineafowl.
• the flesh of birds, esp. of the domestic cock or hen, as food; poultry.
• birds collectively, esp. as the quarry of hunters.
The KJV translation of the Bible was written in 1611. Terms have changed since then. Oh yeah, and btw. Bats were never mentioned in the Bible to my knowledge. Unless you can give me a passage that states otherwise, I am quite afraid to say...YOU fail.
ok i looked at the other translations and most of them translated to bird and when they didnt they translated to fowl exept for the contemporary english version which did not mention what they were i am guessing that fowl in the kjv version must translate into bird for the lack of other word translation but all the versions mention bats in leviticus 11:13-19
Yeah! You've hammered that into my head without mercy!!! Your point already!?!? On with it dude! Seriously! What does it take to gain some cooperation!?
I've read the Bible 7 times, my Xian friend! And I'm tired of reading about killings, rapes, murders, genocides, child-killing, concubine-cutting ups, and idiots that send people to hell.
We are supposed to love our enemies, but what is God to do with those who do not have faith, my atheist friend? Heaven is truly becoming one with God, the Holy Spirit, and Jesus Christ. If you are not in Heaven, then your soul is eradicated.
we are not to question God's existence, there's just no evidence of it, the burden of proof is within those who say he exists. And they are normally tied to religion!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Atheist = someone one denies the existence of God
The options with God - are you can either believe or not believe. You can not refute God without any evidence. Agnosticism is a fair possibility, but not atheism. It is impossible to refute God. Not believing is an option, refuting is not. And there IS a difference.
you are confused here, atheists are not the people who deny the possibility of a god, atheist is someone who doesn't BELIEVE there is a god because there's simply no evidence for it, all atheists are agnostics, there are agnostic theists and agnostic atheists, and then theres religious people, you should research a bit more, just use google!
Your right. it does not refute the existence of a higher being. But if you believe in a god who is all loving and still allows all of this torture than we now KNOW that your god is either not all loving or he is not all powerful in which case he cannot be god(cause hes not all powerful).
Notice how you have to bring in biblical interpretations - "a god who is all loving".
That is an assumption of what a higher being's characteristic would be. I believe that a higher being created the world - I am not convinced that a higher being controls our daily activities. And also our interpretation of what is right or wrong is limited to our own mental capacities. I think torture is wrong. A higher being may see a point to it that we could never grasp.
im just making a claim against how Christians view their god. If he isnt all loving then the world according to that claim makes sense, what with all the suffering and "evil". And your right, if a higher being does exist he may see a point to it that we dont, but to me it makes no sense unless this higher being is evil. But again, science is gaining a bigger understanding of our universe the more time passes. Just cause something is unexplainable atm does not mean god did it.
Christianity is an interpretation of God. Of course it is entitled to criticism. But the single core essence of "a God" is difficult to refute. I can understand someone saying they choose not to believe in God...but I have difficulty understanding people who say there is absolutely no God. Very difficult to refute something.
Faith is another way of saying : I no longer care what's true.
TheHigherVoltage 1 week ago
Wow he took a leap of faith off the edge of the flat earth.
The difference between this video and reality is, wishful thinking doesn't make something true.
FunkyWhitePimp 2 weeks ago in playlist Religion: Magic, Mystery, Business, Extremism & Insanity
Odd, isn't it, how so many people seem to think having "faith" is some sort of admirable quality, instead of a thoughtless, irrational one.
carmium 3 weeks ago
Wow, this video gives new meaning to the word "sucks"
BADDOOKUS 3 months ago
Meaning of story? Christians are just like lemmings. Except more retarded.
QBRebel16 4 months ago
@AutumnSplendors "...Otherwise you are no less than a Pavlovian dog, aimlessly seeking the sensationalism ..."
I agree with ueks69. That statement is loaded with blind malice towards those who dare think differently than you. Just remember, DOG, that you will be judged with the same malevolence you acted with when you played judge.
moopism 5 months ago
@AutumnSplendors I'm glad your mother lived to a ripe old age, but I do not see what that has to do with a Jewish zombie!
Yahweh didn't put anyone anywhere, & if he really existed, I would advice you to stay away from it! It's an evil monster that pretends to create things, but in reality, only likes to destroy, torture, & hate!
Nilsy1975 6 months ago
do me a favour here.
1. get down on your knees and put your hands together.
2. close your eyes.
3. move your knuckles away from eachother, making a circle with both hands.
4. now open your mouth as if you are talking to god.
5. now think of what you are telling your children to do every night before bed.
6. if for some reason step 5 doesn't apply to you (because you're not retarded) lol at all the christians out there in the world tell their kids to suck invisible dick every night.
:)
randomperson2538 6 months ago 3
@randomperson2538 ROFL
king78802 6 months ago
@king78802 I was waiting for someone to get that XD
randomperson2538 6 months ago
Simple, direct, to the point, and entertaining. I like.
aMulliganStew 6 months ago
@AutumnSplendors Care to back that claim with some serius evidence ;)
Your proposition is a fallacy in itself.
If you truely believe that statement, your dumb and ignorant....If you wrote that statement to convey your innermost hatred of anyone not believing in your magical skydaddy, then your not very christian, but a liar. So which is it, liar or dumb and ignorant :)
ueks69 6 months ago
Nothing real requires faith.
YY4Me133 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The difference between the three Abrahamic religions: Christianity mumbling to the ceiling, Judaism mumbling to the wall, Islam mumbling to the floor.
aghahowa11 7 months ago
@AutumnSplendors lol So God kills atheists now. How delusional can one person get.
antonny11 7 months ago 2
anyone know the title of that one video with the stick figures one of which keeps saying 'god did it' and the third one set in a 'science store'?
Zuifan 7 months ago
Good video, make more :)
b1gr1g 10 months ago
Who the heck is Frater Ravus? Ahahahahahahahaaaa!!!
helpmetony 10 months ago
I can respect your freedom to believe what you wish, but why knock others for their choice to believe something you don't? Why spend so much time bashing someone who thinks differently?
That's called a Bigot.
TheAmazingCreative 10 months ago
@TheAmazingCreative It's because the belief causes so much trouble and conflicy in the world and has been responsible for the repression, torture, and death of so many humans. It is an evil, selfish doctrine and should be fought against if humanity is to better itself. The further away we move from our religious books, the more civilised we become.
boc1953 10 months ago
@TheAmazingCreative "Why spend so much time bashing someone who thinks differently?" Aside from demonstrating reciprocity towards the beliefs? Aside from the propagation of ignorance that is called for to maintain the beliefs? Aside from the detriment to not only the past but also the present condition of humanity that the beliefs enforce?
Or how about how this video only displays the fact, supported by evidence, that "faith" only gets someone so far before they cause massive harm?
onijester56 8 months ago
People who deny science should try living without it.
davidls11 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@heyhey3417 Whatever. You obviously have nothing of substance to offer.
hdregmore 1 year ago
@hdregmore (continuation) 6) You are right.
kanmoreti 1 year ago
@hdregmore 1) No it's not. Maybe some atheist do, but if you talk to any renown scientist, he/she will tell you that science is completely "agnostic" in the "god" question. 2) I know that scientific knowledge is not absolute, and I haven't claimed so. And it does not require faith, it requires evidence. 3) You didn't even address my point 4) Again, not answering my point 5) PERSONALLY, you said it yourself. To justify something you have to verify it in a way that is recognizable by everybody.
kanmoreti 1 year ago
@kanmoreti Still counting laboriously huh? 1) Yes it is, just look at the videos and comments on atheist material on YT. 2) If it is not "absolute" then it requires faith to believe it will give us further answers. 3) You didn't read my answer 4) You STILL did not read my answer 5) So what is your point? Are personal experiences not real? 6) I am glad that you agree with your assumption being foolish.
Anything else or can I chalk this one up now?
hdregmore 1 year ago
@hdregmore 1) That is what I said. Atheists might use science for defending atheism, but science itself does not answer the god question. 2) Answer is continuously giving new answers to different question. One doesn't require faith to believe it will eventually give us more and more answers. 3) I said that science is testable (which is a fact), and then you said that science's assumptions are well documented, which is not true. 4) same
kanmoreti 1 year ago
@kanmoreti 1) Okay that is what you were attempting to deny. Atheists use science to support their idea. 2) By your own admission science is answering questions while posing new ones. Your faith allows you to suggest further answers are knowable. 3) if you do not know of the basic assumptions of science then I suggest you look them up. 4) Same.
hdregmore 1 year ago
@hdregmore This conversation is not going anywhere. I am not gonna convince you and you are not gonna convince. So yeah, nice talking to you.
kanmoreti 1 year ago
@kanmoreti Whatever. Next time when you decide to numerically criticize comments, kindly have the wherewithal to back it up.
hdregmore 1 year ago
@hdregmore (cont..) 5) One might think that he/she has had a personal experience, but he/she might be mistaken and what happened to him/her might be completely natural. One can't trust the personal experience of other people. You should watch QualiaSoup's video that addresses this issue. 6) When someone commits a mistake, one has to admit it.
kanmoreti 1 year ago
@hdregmore
Really? You're comparing religion - where you can't test anything, to science - where everything has to be tested before it is accepted... and you're saying both have the same leap of faith?
Spetsop 1 year ago
@Spetsop I am saying that faith is required in science and religion.
hdregmore 1 year ago
woah.... the last quote blew me away:)) Great vid
zh1412 1 year ago
and questioning is so much fun!
Ecdysiast96 1 year ago
Loved the video!
There are two main causes of war. Faith and greed. There is a reason I put faith first.
bigsqueegee 1 year ago
Faith can do everything through Jesus. Watch "what faith can do" - Kutless
dreexdis 1 year ago
This is a good video. Your others are not very good though. They are high quality productionwise but they aren't funny or don't have very good points (with few exceptions).
klalkity 1 year ago
The difference between the three Abrahamic religions: Christianity mumbling to the ceiling, Judaism mumbling to the wall, Islam mumbling to the floor.
brokenscimitar 2 years ago 123
@brokenscimitar As opposed to atheism which is mumbling to yourself in a dark corner.
hdregmore 1 year ago
Oh, I LOVE that one. :)
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Before being too sinicle, or
buying in to sketpticism founded on
frustration - Do your homework.
fgbowen 2 years ago
@fgbowen
Before wagging your finger at the video maker for 'not doing their homework', do a spelling check. It's "cynical" not "sinicle."
As Ali G said "Techmology. It's amazing. For thousands of years people have been reading books. Thanks to techmology, we can write them now too."
8blkcat 2 years ago
Beautifully done!
Thank you for your excellent work.
Clean, simple, concise, and correct.
Krocotto 2 years ago
That is why I read the king James.
gigaboy47 2 years ago
the bible was not originally written in English, that is the point
Qusha10 2 years ago
That makes no sense.
gigaboy47 2 years ago
that point is, that the bible was originally written in a language other than English (Greek) so, to take the literal meaning of an English translation of the bible is to miss the point, because the Greek-English translation was far off from perfect, and quite a bit of meaning was lost
Qusha10 2 years ago
Doesn't a being threatening to send you to hell if you don't do what he says bear some responsibility to release another version of his supposed word in a context that people can understand? It wouldn't be difficult, he is all-powerful, after all.
federalD 2 years ago
King James? Srsly? The one with unicorns and stuff? And why do you read it? And not the Hebrew/Greek original?
The problem with the english Bible is that the greek original can be translated in so many ways. Take the gospel of John. It starts "In the beginning was the Word". You could also translate the greek as "In principle, there was reason".
But as one US teacher once said: If English was good enough for our Lord Jesus Chirst, it surely is good enough for everyone else. :D
lagerbaer 2 years ago 3
The quote "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me," was from the GOVERNOR of Texas when discussing Spanish language classes in public schools.
Great quote! It shows the incredible Animal-Farm-esque tendency of the believer to rewrite history in accordance with their own willful ignorance.
And that on two levels: the history of their "holy book" and the history of their governance (Texas' constitution).
Nice piont about the Hebrew & Greek originals, lagerbaer :-)
8blkcat 2 years ago 2
Leap of faith isn't mentioned in the holy scriptures.
Could have come out of Heelywood!
vrghiks 2 years ago
This video really brings up a good point.
A lot of the creationists agree that believing in god does require a leap of faith, but that not believing one requires just as large of one. The creationists are the ones that keep leaping away, while the atheists are the ones keeping their feet on the ground.
tbillinger 2 years ago 2
I thought the guy was just gonna keep on jumping until he couldn't hear what the Atheist was saying and then go "Ahh, that's better!"
That seems to be what all other Christians do!
Bowmaj21 2 years ago 42
@Bowmaj21 Maybe he had his blue tooth on, and got a phone call... Can you believe me now?.. how about now?..
BoltOfThundor 1 year ago
Jesus said: I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep
markch9v23 2 years ago
so?
cohaagendesu 2 years ago
Actually, a good shepherd DOESN'T lay down their life for their sheep, because that makes it hard to shear them and milk them and kill them and eat them.
In fact, a good shepherd goes out of his way to NOT lay down his life for sheep that can be replaced.
Kieranfoy 2 years ago 2
teachings of the bible ?.. like slavery is ok ...women are inferior lifeforms... innocent people burning in hell ...etc...
The bible is an evil book full of horror and should never be taught to children
journeyman66 2 years ago 2
There's a lot of things in the bible that are based on basic morals. In the New Testament. Not the Old Testament. Basically, the Old Testament is the evil part of the Bible.
saiyajin11 2 years ago
"the Old Testament is the evil part of the Bible" -saiyajin
Jesus hasnt the slightest objection to the cruelties of the Old Testament. "Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest part or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place." (Matthew 5:17)
8blkcat 2 years ago 4
This cartoon suggests all Christians are ignorant.
Fail.
I'm an open-minded Christian who very well knows that I might be wrong in what I believe in. This cartoon spits in my face.
Stop with the bias towards religion. I know that atheists are smart people, but the only person igorant here is the creator of this video.
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
if you know that, then you don't believe it. You just think it. Believing something is thinking you know it's true, whether it actually is or not.
EvansRowan123 2 years ago
One can believe, and still have an open and realistic mind.
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
That's if you believe things that are true or almost certainly true, like evolution, gravity, the world being round, etc.
The existance of god is not only uncertain but unlikely, so it's a whole different kettle of fish (yay nonsensical expressions)
EvansRowan123 2 years ago
Theism doesn't block the mind 100%.
Oh, and you said the existence of God is unlikely? Says you! Hmm, over millions of religious folks would disagree with you on that. So, you say
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
There is a scientific explanation of the origin of the universe that doesn't require a creator, so occam's razor implies that the existance of a creator god is unlikely because it's unnecessary.
Couple that with how unreliable the bible is (in order to believe it and keep your credibility, you need to say half of it is metaphorical at least) and the scientific record of miracles (thousands claimed, 0 proven) and you get a very low chance of the judeo-christian god existing.
EvansRowan123 2 years ago
Scientific Explanation =/= Facts
Until I'm presented woth Physical evidence of the Big Bang I'm gonig to reject it
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
Does that enter into it? my explanation is better than your explanation, has fewer holes, is more thoroughly tested, is supported by more evidence. It's more likely to be right.
The only kind of explanations you can be 100% sure of are mathematical/logical proofs, everything else is just a matter of what's more likely.
entropy, microwave background radiation, and universal expansion.
But why reject it? without it, there's no reason for the universe to have begun, and no need for a creator.
EvansRowan123 2 years ago
Ha well show me this "evidence" you speak of
I have my evidence: The Bible. Although harshly bashed, thr Bible is true and just. Atheists take what the Bible says way out of porportion to promote their own bias views.
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
The evidence for the scientific explanation? all the evidence in the observable universe. Where would you like to start?
The bible supports slavery. Do you?
EvansRowan123 2 years ago
The evidence for the obersvable universe? The Bible.
Mind actually giving a Bible verse as to where it says slavery is ok?
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
that makes no sense.
Well, there's Leviticus 25:44-46 that says who you can buy and sell as slaves.
EvansRowan123 2 years ago
Well, your claim about evidence of scientific explanation being the observable world makes no sense. Touche, brother.
As to slavery, God would never approve of the enslavement of man. That's why he appointed Moses to free the Jews.
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
I said all the evidence in the observable universe.
You said earlier the bible is true and just. Which were you lying about?
EvansRowan123 2 years ago
Yes, ignore everything!
You've obviously never read the bible.
JonathanClement140 2 years ago 2
Stop talking to me, your attempts at converting me to atheism fails
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
If what you believe is true, why are you so afraid?
JonathanClement140 2 years ago
Whoever said I was afraid?
You don't get that you can't force me to conform to your way of thinking, label me if you please, but see if I care.
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
Why do you believe in Christian?
Also, have you ever actually read the bible from cover to cover?
JonathanClement140 2 years ago
You don't get it!
I'm Christian because I want to be. I find truth in the teachings of Jesus and the Bible.
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
Like what?
JonathanClement140 2 years ago
The fact that Jesus is my savior and that God sent him to die for our sins.
Along with the morals he preached about with his 12 prophets. I understand why you are critizing me, but please stop it.
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
jesus is cool.
Redkinglouie 2 years ago
So, it's just that people are infinitely punished for finite crimes?
JonathanClement140 2 years ago
Oh. You just told that guy.
saiyajin11 2 years ago
Riddle me this! There was a Bible dated back to B.C. It told of a man who did things that are almost exactly the same as what Jesus did. Again. B.C.
saiyajin11 2 years ago
ah you you all wont leave me alone...
ok screw all of you, you obviously have no respect for my beliefs, you wont let them be...
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
Well you obviously don't respect ours by coming to a Youtube video by a guy who makes athiest cartoons (obvious by his name) and putting up comments trying to prove your religion is right and our non belief is wrong.
saiyajin11 2 years ago
idc
leave me alone
this is my last comment related to this video. so, insult me if you want, I wont be around to read your ignorant comments, so screw all of you people, you're going to burn in hell regardless, so enjoy the pathetic life you currently have.
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
Oh. And I'm not Athiest.
saiyajin11 2 years ago
"you're going to burn in hell" was your own words.
You want us to respect that belief?
They should give classes in school called Common Sense. For Christ's sake work on your people skills
centristross 2 years ago 3
fine you don't respect my beliefs. And my fellow Christians should lobby for an elective in school for alternative creation theory (a.k.a God).
Complain all you want, but we mean good in doing so, but you guys want to restrict our religious rights, right?
Masterofxtreme93 2 years ago
If you want to take some class to teach you creationism, fine. Do in on Sunday... at church. There is no way it should be taught in SCIENCE class. If it is taught, ALL creation theories should be taught, since public schools are open to people of all faiths. That would take a lot of time. You want religion? Go to church. You want to be educated? Go to school. There shouldn't be an overlap.
lorianne03 2 years ago 2
You can't claim you "mean good in doing so" while pushing "alternative creation god theory" forward as science to be taught to children in school... It's irresponsible and frankly offensive, what they will have learnt in those classes won't contribute in anyway useful towards the world, reason why science has gotten us this far in just over a century, it accurately describes and predicts how things behave, your theory on the other hand, could be true, but doesn't help us to advance in any way.
aaron4820 2 years ago
Take your shitty religion and do with it whatever you like, Masterofxtreme93, but keep it where it belongs. At home.
lagerbaer 2 years ago 3
@Masterofxtreme93 It's not your right to put religion in schools. THAT IS NOT YOUR RIGHT. Get it through your thick fucking skull!!! I couldn't give a flying fuck if you mean well, I don't want you to spread your shit all over the textbooks. SORRY if that fucking offends you, but the constitution CLEARLY states that government and church be separate, you IDIOT. Oh, and if you REALLY wanted to put an alternative, and present all the ideas to let the kids choose, put in all the other religions too
jeffsandychelsea 1 year ago
@Masterofxtreme93
Lol.
Christianity should be taught only in "Mythology" class. Along with fairy stories, Greek and Roman myths, King Arthur and Star Wars. The students should be encouraged to compare the various myths, identifying similarities in the story structures and character-types involved.
(They would find that Jesus isn't the first fictional hero to be born of a virgin and to die heroically for the sake of mankind - and that's just for starters...)
jazzx251 1 year ago
@jazzx251 not in the mood for religious arguments over the internet anymore.
BTW, my comments on this video are beyond old, so idc
Masterofxtreme93 1 year ago
Logical fallacy: Argumentum ad populum.
JonathanClement140 2 years ago
this video its so sweet!! haha christians are like... grazy people hahaha
JoKeRxxPR 2 years ago
Are they? Prove it.
NoogahOogah 2 years ago
You mean they're sheep? Nice little typo :P
DooMDrat 2 years ago
And it says the sun revolves around the earth!!!
myswtsatn 2 years ago
That was what people believed back then. Also, it states the earth was round hundreds of years before science proved so. Will guys please stop attacking us? At least make a logical debate, and discontinue these demeaning videos. Ever occur to you that we are human too?
NoogahOogah 2 years ago
Didn't it specifically say it was circular? Could be wrong though. Also, the fact that they might have got one or two things right doesn't change the fact it got so much more wrong.
DooMDrat 2 years ago
They got it all wrong. It was totally and completely misrepresented. It's like when Kent Hovind says "They believe we came from a rock!" It's a total misrepresentation of evolution. Somewhat true, but twisted around ridiculously.
NoogahOogah 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
someone who doesnt believe sent me this....I will leap for Jesus any day of the week.
PTL
Soulfreedom31 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Amen, Soulfreedom!
TooSoonTooYoung 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
because you're stupid
ModelAnarchist 2 years ago 2
"I will leap for Jesus any day of the week."
Yup. Just like trained pups will jump for the circus man.
amoxtlacatl 2 years ago 19
If god says jump...
dragoro7 2 years ago
So if you heard a voice in your head claiming to be god, and telling you to kill your neighbor and rape his wife, would you do it?
There are those who would do it readily in such a case. Some would admit so proudly. People with that attitude need to be locked up.
DooMDrat 2 years ago
Pft. Too bad for them! They certainly don't represent the entirety of all Christians. If there was such a voice I would not listen to it.
NoogahOogah 2 years ago
That's good to hear.
DooMDrat 2 years ago
why was he jumping ?
utsavman47 2 years ago
He was Leaping :P
supajasiu 2 years ago
Love that quote at the end by "Frater Ravus."
Short and powerful!!
dmtw1982 2 years ago 7
frater, you and would be great friends.
paranoidude 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Faith is what saves you, you idiot.
It doesn't give you all of the answers, that's the word of Christ.
TheKidGuitarist 2 years ago
no it isn't, that's the word of some guy 2,000 years ago, which was then edited by hundreds of people a few centuries afterwards, which was then translated to english.
tburysux 2 years ago 7
Good knowledge and good intent makes the world better. The lack of knowledge makes it worse.
Train yourself with science and follow the golden rule!
I don't care about the fairy tales you like, but do not think they are related to any actual knowledge.
notinlist 2 years ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
The Golden Rule originated from the Bible. Do unto others as you would have them do to you.
Fairy tales? Read the Bible so you can understand that it is not a "fairy tale"
I believe in evolution. I believe that God created the micro-organisms that eventually evolved into humans. You don't think it all had to start from somewhere?
TheKidGuitarist 2 years ago
Go to Wikipedia and read "Ethic of reciprocity". The Golden Rule is not from the bible.
Again: Train yourself.
notinlist 2 years ago 16
This has been flagged as spam show
You can't seriously trust wikipedia for something like this, can you? You have got to be kidding me. The article was most likely written by atheists!
TheKidGuitarist 2 years ago
Check out the "References" section at the bottom of the page and go after it!
Yes. Technically, Wikipedia is not a 100% sure source for scientific information, that's why it cannot be used as reference in a homework at universities. That's correct.
But telling that a page - or generally pages you don't like - are products of "atheist propaganda" is a very brave claim.
Wikipedia is more likely to be true than false. Go after it if you don't believe.
notinlist 2 years ago 18
Bahahahaha
Conspiracy theorist at it's finest. Any page that contradicts your believes must be written by those evil atheists!
Faustuss1 2 years ago 10
I see that just because it does not verify your claims you will blame it on Wikipedia. No, actually you're just wrong. And just because it was written by atheists doesn't mean it is incorrect.
ModmanGlest 2 years ago 4
u know any one can edit wikipedia and ur going to need a more reliable resource
Assassin23246 2 years ago
Please read my comment.
Check out the "References" section at the bottom of the page and go after it.
What do you don't understand? Go after it! Not on Wikipedia! Check the references! Got it already? Good. Thank you.
notinlist 2 years ago 2
"I believe in evolution. I believe that God created the micro-organisms that eventually evolved into humans. You don't think it all had to start from somewhere?"
oh oh oh, that's rich. So your "loving god" allowed thousands upon thousands of generations of the evolutionary lines that eventually created us to exist merely as a catalyst for the creation of your god's perfect creation?
He murdered millions upon millions of our ancestors just to create us? How arrogant. What a bastard!
jaywolfe82 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Read the Bible you atheist.
You really have no idea whatsoever about Jesus, so why don't you learn a little bit before you start making cartoons aimed against Christianity?
If you would like to go to hell, that's your choice.
TheKidGuitarist 2 years ago
Read the Big Book o' Atheism, you theist.
You really have no idea about the Invisible Pink Uncorn, so why don't you learn before you star making comments aimed against Atheism?
If you want to go to Hell, that's your choice.
Kieranfoy 2 years ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
Read the Bible why don't you?
Do you even know what hell is? Do you know what heaven is?
TheKidGuitarist 2 years ago
Read it. Boring, bloody. No different than Greek or Egyptian or Celtic myths, except that they're more sophisticated.
Kieranfoy 2 years ago 13
Many atheists have read the Bible, but do not believe what it says to be true. Without evidence, why should they believe its claims?
SJGster 2 years ago 16
This has been flagged as spam show
There was evidence in the Bible.
TheKidGuitarist 2 years ago
AHAHAHAHAHHA! Wait, that wasn't a joke? You seriously believe that a text (other than mathematical) can provide evidence for its correctness within itself?
SJGster 2 years ago 11
"There WAS evidnece in the Bible"
You must mean before we knew the world wasn't flat, and the Earth is more than 6-8 thousand years old.
y277480v 2 years ago 17
@y277480v The Bible never says the world is flat...
Domodeath 1 year ago
your bible says that bats are birds lol
perrson22 2 years ago 2
Har. No it doesn't. They are fowls of the air if that's what you mean.
NoogahOogah 2 years ago
i just looked up fowl in the dictionary: a gallinaceous bird kept chiefly for its eggs and flesh; a domestic cock or hen. • The domestic fowl is descended from the wild red junglefowl of Southeast Asia (see jungle fowl ).
• any other domesticated bird kept for its eggs or flesh, e.g., the turkey, duck, goose, and guineafowl.
• the flesh of birds, esp. of the domestic cock or hen, as food; poultry.
• birds collectively, esp. as the quarry of hunters.
• archaic a bird
so yea you fail
perrson22 2 years ago
The KJV translation of the Bible was written in 1611. Terms have changed since then. Oh yeah, and btw. Bats were never mentioned in the Bible to my knowledge. Unless you can give me a passage that states otherwise, I am quite afraid to say...YOU fail.
NoogahOogah 2 years ago
ok i looked at the other translations and most of them translated to bird and when they didnt they translated to fowl exept for the contemporary english version which did not mention what they were i am guessing that fowl in the kjv version must translate into bird for the lack of other word translation but all the versions mention bats in leviticus 11:13-19
perrson22 2 years ago
Okay, then your complaint is? (By the way, you have yet to make a grammatically/punctuation/capitalization correct comment.)
NoogahOogah 2 years ago
my point was that fowl translates into bird because none of the other versions said any thing other than bird or fowl
perrson22 2 years ago
So what? Get the point man! Your wasting my time.
NoogahOogah 2 years ago
that means that the bible says bats are birds
perrson22 2 years ago
Yeah! You've hammered that into my head without mercy!!! Your point already!?!? On with it dude! Seriously! What does it take to gain some cooperation!?
NoogahOogah 2 years ago
well it was just that you kept asking what i meant sorry
perrson22 2 years ago
Oh! Okay. Well, why did you say it in the first place?
NoogahOogah 2 years ago
I've read the Bible 7 times, my Xian friend! And I'm tired of reading about killings, rapes, murders, genocides, child-killing, concubine-cutting ups, and idiots that send people to hell.
Whatever happened to "Love thy enemy"?
ExGileadMissionary 2 years ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
We are supposed to love our enemies, but what is God to do with those who do not have faith, my atheist friend? Heaven is truly becoming one with God, the Holy Spirit, and Jesus Christ. If you are not in Heaven, then your soul is eradicated.
TheKidGuitarist 2 years ago
hey kid. just give up before you hurt yourself
TheRealEricLester 2 years ago 2
I went through the same process and got rid of all my "faith". Nice job!
ExGileadMissionary 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Try saying that again while you are in hell.
TheKidGuitarist 2 years ago
OK, I'll see you there, LOL. Send me a drop of water while you are in the bosom position of Abe.
ExGileadMissionary 2 years ago
Very good point at the end.
tetlik 2 years ago
He's gonna go to hell for committing suicide.
5k4k1dhtp 2 years ago 10
The good ol' leapy frog christians.
qanazir 2 years ago
lol, nice one
1GOD1JESUS 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
god dont kill people people kill people ,
you cant just pray and expect to get wat u want , god give people the faith to get eat they want ,
everyone has a choice
tshaiyanique 3 years ago
Can you say that again in English?
I agree, God doesn't kill people. Non-existance makes killing, and pretty much everything else, impossible.
But if you believe in what the bible says, you have to believe that God kills people. It's there in black and white.
TheSpineyOne 2 years ago 4
excuse me. i have a question? what does to get eat they want mean?
paranoidude 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Questioning religion, does not question God.
I've noticed a lot of videos on youtube by atheists like to target religion. It still doesn't refute the existence of a higher being.
Keep trying.
shonester 3 years ago
we are not to question God's existence, there's just no evidence of it, the burden of proof is within those who say he exists. And they are normally tied to religion!
ArmandoXIII 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Atheist = someone one denies the existence of God
The options with God - are you can either believe or not believe. You can not refute God without any evidence. Agnosticism is a fair possibility, but not atheism. It is impossible to refute God. Not believing is an option, refuting is not. And there IS a difference.
shonester 3 years ago
you are confused here, atheists are not the people who deny the possibility of a god, atheist is someone who doesn't BELIEVE there is a god because there's simply no evidence for it, all atheists are agnostics, there are agnostic theists and agnostic atheists, and then theres religious people, you should research a bit more, just use google!
ArmandoXIII 3 years ago 2
Your right. it does not refute the existence of a higher being. But if you believe in a god who is all loving and still allows all of this torture than we now KNOW that your god is either not all loving or he is not all powerful in which case he cannot be god(cause hes not all powerful).
crackerkiller89 3 years ago 2
Notice how you have to bring in biblical interpretations - "a god who is all loving".
That is an assumption of what a higher being's characteristic would be. I believe that a higher being created the world - I am not convinced that a higher being controls our daily activities. And also our interpretation of what is right or wrong is limited to our own mental capacities. I think torture is wrong. A higher being may see a point to it that we could never grasp.
shonester 3 years ago
im just making a claim against how Christians view their god. If he isnt all loving then the world according to that claim makes sense, what with all the suffering and "evil". And your right, if a higher being does exist he may see a point to it that we dont, but to me it makes no sense unless this higher being is evil. But again, science is gaining a bigger understanding of our universe the more time passes. Just cause something is unexplainable atm does not mean god did it.
crackerkiller89 3 years ago 3
Christianity is an interpretation of God. Of course it is entitled to criticism. But the single core essence of "a God" is difficult to refute. I can understand someone saying they choose not to believe in God...but I have difficulty understanding people who say there is absolutely no God. Very difficult to refute something.
shonester 3 years ago
So then what is god? what do you define as god, or what is the accepted definition of "a god"?
crackerkiller89 3 years ago