Please go to change.org and sign the petition to the FDA to legalize Antineoplastons. Type in Antineoplastons in the search and it will take you to the petition. Share this with your friends and family!! Please help with this.
If you want to see the full movie documentary come over to my account and click on my video "The Burzynski Movie - Sgt. Schiff's Testimony (Extended Scene)" the link to the full movie is in the video description.
The real question is, why dosn't the FDA approved of the medication. If Dr. Burzysnki really cares about the the children, he would release the information about the medication so that other Drs. across the nation help save the poor children. The medication is only for the rich. poor people don't stand a chance.
@Matthewsoto95 actually, if you watch the movie, you will see that it is a combination of meds that he works out for each patient. When he did give out the info for how to treat his protocol was changed by the testors so that it would not work. He isn't just treating rich kids.
@Matthewsoto95 You gotta watch the movie about his cancer treatment to understand WHY FDA is playing games with him for over 30 years now. FDA is the biggest greediest whore organisation that has been ever created. You will be shocked to find out what this brilliant man had to go through. Watch the movie "Cancer is serious business" If you have Netflix, it is available for viewing there.
The real question is why does the FDA approve chemotherapy which has shown NO proof of reducing cancer in randomized trials? Considering the harmful side effects, and the expensive cost of chemotherapy, which is only reduced due to the fact its insurable while Burzysnki's treatment is not, it sure seems like a hypocritical stance that has absolutely no science to back it up. You will find most of the people attacking Burzysnki have a personal bias.
@NeutralExistence what makes you think there's no evidence that chemotherapy reduces cancer? A simple Pubmed search will show hundreds of clinical trials that show its efficacy. A simple Cochrane Library search will show hundreds of systematic reviews showing the efficacy of chemotherapy.
Don't make me laugh, hundreds of trials showing its efficacy?
""
Proof of efficacy of a cancer treatment such as chemotherapy requires a randomised trial in which it has been shown that the group treated with chemotherapy experienced a significantly increased survival when compared with that of an untreated group.
""
Show me these Pubmed articles, I would love to see them considering such a test has never been done to prove chemo's efficacy.
So I am assuming you looked through all 300, to verify that they did in fact prove the efficacy of chemotherapy? I am starting to look through them now.... first two I have looked at aren't looking good, they seem to be actually refuting your claims. Please take the time to send me VIA PM the one's which prove the efficacy of chemotherapy. I will take the time to show you some that prove me correct.
High dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer.
Although there is evidence that high dose chemotherapy and autograft significantly improves event-free survival compared to conventional chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer there is NO significant evidence of benefit in overall survival.
Overall, the results of this review do not justify the use of HDC with SCR as a standard therapy for children with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. However, all reported studies were possibly subject to significant bias, especially selection bias. This might have underestimated the measured effect of HDC. As a result, a clinically important excess of adverse risk patients in the HDC arms may explain the non-beneficial effect of HDC.
@fractalization - What is your life worth? Dr. Burzynski has spent millions of dollars devoping his treatments and fighting the FDA and big pharma for 14 years to accept them and allow him to treat patients. His treatments are currently FDA approved and covered by insurance.
@fractalization - my exact sentiments... the poor are considered disposable. We are left with toxic substances that don't even help mitigate symptoms, but create more problems...and that's if you're lucky enough to have medical insurance
I like this interviewer. She asks intelligent questions and gives her guests a chance to speak. MUCH better than Oprah!! (who I don't bother to watch anymore).
It is astonishing to see and hear Dr. Burznski's discovery related to cancer. I haven't heard any of the talking heads talk about his success with cancer. This news is almost unbelievable because of its nature. Is it like seeing a UFO? Maybe, time will surely tell in the next few months.
@mars71mustang It's the mainstream media's job to suppress news like this. Many of the same companies that own the pharmaceutical drugs own or have interest in the major networks, not to mention the millions of dollars spent on drug ads. MONEY TALKS. Do yourself a favor and check out the documentary @ burzynskimovie. com.
This has been flagged as spam show
I started a petition addressing the FDA on change.org, please sign it and tell others! THANKS!
this is the link
(replace the 'DOT' with an actual '.'
change DOT org/petitions/a-cure-kicking-cancers-ass-must-read
ryno33076 2 months ago
let them people have there cure
alienhddna 3 months ago
is it just me or does the spokesperson just look sleazy
yendor1200 3 months ago
Now that's a REAL doctor!
quickz187 6 months ago 3
Please go to change.org and sign the petition to the FDA to legalize Antineoplastons. Type in Antineoplastons in the search and it will take you to the petition. Share this with your friends and family!! Please help with this.
MicrotronicUS 6 months ago 16
If you want to see the full movie documentary come over to my account and click on my video "The Burzynski Movie - Sgt. Schiff's Testimony (Extended Scene)" the link to the full movie is in the video description.
Joshua271987 7 months ago
The real question is, why dosn't the FDA approved of the medication. If Dr. Burzysnki really cares about the the children, he would release the information about the medication so that other Drs. across the nation help save the poor children. The medication is only for the rich. poor people don't stand a chance.
Matthewsoto95 8 months ago
@Matthewsoto95 actually, if you watch the movie, you will see that it is a combination of meds that he works out for each patient. When he did give out the info for how to treat his protocol was changed by the testors so that it would not work. He isn't just treating rich kids.
firstsharlord 4 months ago 2
@Matthewsoto95 You gotta watch the movie about his cancer treatment to understand WHY FDA is playing games with him for over 30 years now. FDA is the biggest greediest whore organisation that has been ever created. You will be shocked to find out what this brilliant man had to go through. Watch the movie "Cancer is serious business" If you have Netflix, it is available for viewing there.
iraidushka 2 months ago
@Matthewsoto95
The real question is why does the FDA approve chemotherapy which has shown NO proof of reducing cancer in randomized trials? Considering the harmful side effects, and the expensive cost of chemotherapy, which is only reduced due to the fact its insurable while Burzysnki's treatment is not, it sure seems like a hypocritical stance that has absolutely no science to back it up. You will find most of the people attacking Burzysnki have a personal bias.
NeutralExistence 2 months ago 4
@NeutralExistence what makes you think there's no evidence that chemotherapy reduces cancer? A simple Pubmed search will show hundreds of clinical trials that show its efficacy. A simple Cochrane Library search will show hundreds of systematic reviews showing the efficacy of chemotherapy.
lamuella 2 months ago
@lamuella
Don't make me laugh, hundreds of trials showing its efficacy?
""
Proof of efficacy of a cancer treatment such as chemotherapy requires a randomised trial in which it has been shown that the group treated with chemotherapy experienced a significantly increased survival when compared with that of an untreated group.
""
Show me these Pubmed articles, I would love to see them considering such a test has never been done to prove chemo's efficacy.
NeutralExistence 2 months ago
@NeutralExistence google "cochrane library". Enter the word "chemotherapy" and take your pick from 300 results.
lamuella 2 months ago
@lamuella
So I am assuming you looked through all 300, to verify that they did in fact prove the efficacy of chemotherapy? I am starting to look through them now.... first two I have looked at aren't looking good, they seem to be actually refuting your claims. Please take the time to send me VIA PM the one's which prove the efficacy of chemotherapy. I will take the time to show you some that prove me correct.
NeutralExistence 2 months ago
@NeutralExistence
High dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer.
Although there is evidence that high dose chemotherapy and autograft significantly improves event-free survival compared to conventional chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer there is NO significant evidence of benefit in overall survival.
NeutralExistence 2 months ago
@NeutralExistence
Overall, the results of this review do not justify the use of HDC with SCR as a standard therapy for children with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. However, all reported studies were possibly subject to significant bias, especially selection bias. This might have underestimated the measured effect of HDC. As a result, a clinically important excess of adverse risk patients in the HDC arms may explain the non-beneficial effect of HDC.
NeutralExistence 2 months ago
@NeutralExistence
So far 4 of the studies I have taken a quick look at have only proven my point further.......
NeutralExistence 2 months ago
@NeutralExistence I would have posted a list of results, but youtube didn't let me post that many results.
lamuella 2 months ago
Comment removed
Stryc9Nine 8 months ago 5
@fractalization - What is your life worth? Dr. Burzynski has spent millions of dollars devoping his treatments and fighting the FDA and big pharma for 14 years to accept them and allow him to treat patients. His treatments are currently FDA approved and covered by insurance.
farber207 8 months ago
@fractalization - my exact sentiments... the poor are considered disposable. We are left with toxic substances that don't even help mitigate symptoms, but create more problems...and that's if you're lucky enough to have medical insurance
to afford the expense.
EarthH2oLuma 10 months ago
burzynski is a angel ,you ar the best
memo1425 1 year ago
I like this interviewer. She asks intelligent questions and gives her guests a chance to speak. MUCH better than Oprah!! (who I don't bother to watch anymore).
NP1D305 1 year ago 9
It is astonishing to see and hear Dr. Burznski's discovery related to cancer. I haven't heard any of the talking heads talk about his success with cancer. This news is almost unbelievable because of its nature. Is it like seeing a UFO? Maybe, time will surely tell in the next few months.
mars71mustang 1 year ago
@mars71mustang It's the mainstream media's job to suppress news like this. Many of the same companies that own the pharmaceutical drugs own or have interest in the major networks, not to mention the millions of dollars spent on drug ads. MONEY TALKS. Do yourself a favor and check out the documentary @ burzynskimovie. com.
TheMindAssassin 1 year ago