It is time you found out that this traitor (Richard Jackson) you are hobnobbing with, was, not long ago, warning us all (myself and Monty included - MANY times on SKYPE), that we were NOT to trust you. He told us this on NUMEROUS ocassions. Why do you think I never answered your calls on SKYPE, especially after the night you asked me to keep your dear wife company while you were at work because she was lonely. Now he is "God blessing" you? You snakes all hiss alike!
@Afrikitty "It is time you found out that this traitor..."
Now you play the hypocrite too Liz. YOU are the one who started the CrumpetCruncher account just to run Bianca off of YouTube, remember? YOU also started the GospelPerverter to run Greg off of YouTube.Yet you didn't want anyone to know. Have you forgotten? You even posted an extremely WEIRD comment on my home page from the CrumpetCruncher bragging that you had banished her to the dessert in Arizona. Remember any of THAT Liz? Fess up!
@Blogrich55 Touche, Richard - Just look at yourself - Just look at yourself.
I HAVE fessed up to GREG HIMSELF regarding my involvement in the GospelPerverter channel. And Richard, HE has forgiven me. So, don't make accusations you know nothing about. Unlike you, I don't do things I am ashamed to own up to. Regarding the "weird" comment as to CrumpetCruncher - errrr, weird, Richard? Really? You laughed your head off because Bianca was no longer coming on your channel and hounding you. Sheeesh.
First of all Liz: CONGRATULATIONS! You are doing an excellent job of running interference for Monty, shifting the focus of the debate by attacking the messenger.
1. I was NOT laughing because "Bianca was no longer..." but at your THINKING you had banished her from YT
2. You NEVER wanted to own up to GPerverter BUT my involvement was obvious.So guess who got blamed every time you made a weird comment using that channel? Me of course!Typical of You!
I see you are still very busy trying to look Reformed. You are not Reformed. You are not even a Particular Baptist. You are a coward and a liar. You were caught teaching heresy time and again in videos and comment sections here on youtube. At no point did you or your theologymatters101 team ever retract a single heresy.
@RedBeetle What heresy am I supposed to retract? When are you going to answer Richard's question? Do you disagree with Clark, are works obligatory? Clark certainly did! What do Presbyterians Believe, pages, 163 -164. And so does the WMCF ch.16, section 3.
Monty you love to go around accusing others of being heretics but you yourself hold to the heresy of antinomianism according Charles Hodge, A A Hodge, and Dr Gordon H Clark (to name a few) as they understand the Westminster Confession of Faith and the Bible. See WCF Chapter 16 section iii. You might also read what Clark says in his book What Do Presbyterians Believe pages 162-164 as well. Your hyper-Law/Gospel distinction position is antinomianism!
Let me remind you, Richard, how you recently told Liz and I that Dwayne Sweatman was pretending to be a Clarkian. You said you thought he was a liar fishing for information about Clark for the purpose of misrepresenting his books. Did you lie about this too, Richard? I told you weeks ago Dwayne had never publicly retracted any of his lies, and you agreed that THAT alone was proof not to trust him. He even lied publicly about not having the ObeyTheGospelOrDie account--LOL!
No Monty, let me remind YOU that you have NEVER answered whether or not you agree with Clark as to the obligatory nature of good works. A simple yes or no will suffice.
Your personal attacks and attempts to stir up strife in order to avoid the question and change the subject are pathetic.
This is the second time I have seen you do this to this friend of yours. Last time I rebuked you and you removed every single one of my comments. You left the comment section looking as though I had never been there. You are a coward, Sir, of the worst degree.
It will only be a matter of time before all these cuckolds will find out what and who you are. I hope Mr. Collier never takes you seriously again. You are indeed a Roman Catholic whore and true to that nature, you are a traitor to boot!
@RedBeetle Why, thank you. Your name is Monty ~ if you will, please allow me to call you such ~ true peacemakers are not sissies who mollycoddle the masses. They are unpopular lions, as was our Lion of Judah and His prophets. They stand on the ramparts and shout out the truth of God. They are hated, as was our Lord. They were sawn asunder, thrown to lions, tarred with pitch and lit as torches to regale the people. They were thrown down wells, drowned, and hounded by mad kings. You are not alone.
@Studier101 "People should be contacted for clarification before such videos as Monty's are done against them. Too often he uses acontextual citations."
Monty was in contact with me via skype quite a lot. He knows very well what I believe. He is upset about lightspeed52 and I uploading videos quoting Clark. He know I do NOT believe in free will, common grace, and I am NOT a Pelagian. God bless you.
Are you now whoring around with doctorh2005? LOL, he never retracted his claim that we're justified by an inward righteousness, Rich. I think you and doctorh2005 would make a good match. You both claim to be Reformed, while both get caught pushing Pelagianism. After getting busted, you both redefine your terms and claim your opponents have misunderstood and removed your claims from context! How Van Tilian! Those who would sale God's truth for popularity have their reward.
@RedBeetle "You both claim to be Reformed, while both get caught pushing Pelagianism."
I have already given my explanation in the video Monty. Honesty and integrity do not seem to be high on your priority list. You value winning at all cost more. Hence you use dirty debate tactics like a lawyer might use in court to harass a witness. You know very well I am not a Pelagian. You've done all of this is because I uploaded Clark's comments on the relation between faith and works.
Once again, merely befriending someone does NOT imply a blanket endorsement of everything they say. You keep making this logical blunder Monty. You need to consider James 4:10-11.
You have never explained why our uploading the video THE RELATI0N BETWEEN FAITH AND WORKS according to Dr Gordon H Clark has upset you so much. How did we engage in casuistry by quoting Clark in context? You have never answered this question. What are you afraid of?
He thinks we are actually justified BEFORE we believe, when Scripture clearly states that faith is the instrumental cause of justification being applied to us through the Holy Spirit - and that we are not "justified" BEFORE faith, but UPON/BY/THROUGH faith.
Don't worry about him. I dealt with him in a previous comment section.
My gosh...this guy needs to grow the heck up...He is giving Calvinism a HIDEOUS name. He is constantly looking for Christians to hunt for not being Calvinistic enough. Someone mistates or slightly disagrees with his mechanism by which God saves, RedBeetle casts these blood bought believers into the pit of hell. My word, RedBeetle, grow up!
@msm1876 God bless you brother. I really like your vids on the cults. Keep up the good work. Suggestion: smile once in a while LOL You frown a LOT bro!
@o3airfilter The gospel is the proclaiming of Christ's death, burial, and resurrection for our sins...and us believing on this (and him) to be saved.
Now, if a person has a true living faith, he will be baptised. He will repent. He will do good works.
Most Protestants (of which I am one) believe that belief is the sole root of justification. I do too. But what about Lutherans? They believe one must be baptised to have sins forgiven. Are they heretics? cont
@o3airfilter And have you read the Early Church Fathers? Next to none believed that Faith was the sole root of justification. The concept of justification was not heavily elucidated in the early church...very little was said until...mmmm....I'm thinking Augustine and Jerome? So was Justin Martyr a heretic because he didn't affirm Sola Fide? I'm thinking not. He may have been mistaken on mechanistically, HOW Christ saves...but assuredly, he would say, it is CHrist that saves.
My name should've been on that list of being falsely accused. But Ok, I and many others have been.
My take on this is: no more YT wars and simply ignore the guy. He likes the attention and it tickles his ego (pride) when someone goes in on his childish nonsense.
@daafith "You are as pelegian as Lady Gaga is a virgin."
ROFLOL Sorry to have left you off the list but if I were to include the entire roll call, I would STILL be making this video. God bless you David (and your new wife.)
@OIObserver Which time? Monty has flat out lied about ALL of us-- Zack, Mark Aponte, and myself. He is obviously lying in this situation. He knows well I don't believe what he accuses me of. He's lied about Mark Sennet and others as well.
@Blogrich55 "Monty has flat out lied about ALL of us---" Really, Richard? - Hmmmm - And their names are Legion, and they are many.
Aaaaaahahahahahah Ha ha ha ha. So, you don't block people, hayyyy, Richie. I see the mean Kitty is blocked. What happened, hayyy? She get too close to the bone for ya, Richie? Shame on you!
You should hold onto your errors BRAVELY and defend them to the hilt, which means that you should allow mean Kitties to challenge you without you attacking her person.
@GospelPerverter So you FINALLY have the integrity to "admit" that you are the owner of the GospelPerverter, ehhh Lizzy? Your comment here is meaningless. It is drivel inspired by your sick, fawning, and simpering adulation of Monty. Debating aside, Lizzy, Monty proves NOTHING by jumping on sloppy wording and trying to use it to accuse someone of believing that which they do NOT believe. It won't work. I am not impressed. God is not honored by bullying and lies. You are BLOCKED Lizzy!
Well spoken Rich and with grace. When the bug does not let you define what you believe you know you’re dealing with a duplicitous person who is more interested in silly gotcha games that are ungodly. For all this we still do not know what Paul and Peter meant by disobey the Gospel. Perhaps we do but we must abandon the antinomians Sola Logic and go with Sola Scriptura and we will be on firmer ground to answer this question. Monty is no Clarkian.
"For all this we STILL DO NOT KNOW WHAT PAUL AND PETER MEANT BY DISOBEY THE GOSPEL."
This is not surprising from a Van Tilian. As the Bible says: But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost (2 Corinithians 3:3). If you knew and believed basic Law / Gospel Distinction, you know what is meant by disobeying the Gospel.
I personally am embarrassed to have someone like Monty claim the title of Christian or Calvinist. Likewise, Monty, more than any other professing Christian here on YT that I am familiar with (Calvinist and Non) is the most deceptive and vile person, and that consistently. The only other people here on YT that I have seen rebuked, corrected and called to repent more than Monty are the doctrinal heretics. That says quite a bit! He is a liar and all liars will have their place in the lake of fire.
@fivepointbaptist I have actually defended Monty in the past, Chris but this time I am speechless and can't justify looking the other way or making excuses for him. He has gone way too far. I don't mean just to me personally but BBirchin, yourself, Reformed Lou and a host of brothers and sisters. Still perusing your paper bro. God bless.
You still pushing the books of Federal Vision leader Douglas Wilson? Blogrich55 told me before several people he was going to explain to you why Doug Wilson was a heretic and a racist. Did he? Didn't you know Wilson denies Sola Fide? Wilson's booklet "Southern Slavery: As It Was," is pro-slavery and racist. I asked you about this when you were cheering doctorh2005, who, like Wilson, also claims we're justified by an inward righteousness. Oh, John Calvin rejected slavery.
@RedBeetle "You still pushing the books of Federal Vision leader Douglas Wilson?"
Any more rabbit holes you care to scamper down RedHerring? This is not the point of the video. You have also lied and accused me of believing in free will when you know better.
@RedBeetle "The difference between you and I is that I can quote you teaching heresy, chump."
No you can't. This is what I said:
"Yes, we believe in free will and human responsibility. What the Arminian believes in is what we would call autonomous free will. That is a will that is totally outside of God's control...autonomous. God's sovereignty even extends to the free will choices of His creatures."
Once again you have ignored the context. I was NOT defending an autonomous free will.
I said you were defending irreconcilable paradox, chump.
That's what Zack was teaching. Free will and determinism are logically incompatible, and you know this. You also know that this is why Van Tilians claim that Sovereignty and responsibility are "mysterious." Your equivocations only work on the ignorant youtubers like fivepointbaptist, clausewitz, and daafith. You are no Clarkian. You should retract your lie, you Catholic-whore.
@RedBeetle At first I thought your language was a bit strong, but I have dealt with this man before. He is a traitor. He betrays anyone who befriends him. He has betrayed you, it seems. He has betrayed other friends of mine and I want to tell you, he is going to betray every other person supporting him in this comment section. I have known him to remove all comments of those who rebuke him. He is a lilly-livered coward who can be trusted with nothing. Your language, Sir, is not strong enough!
@ChristEnduredForMe "but I have dealt with this man before. He is a traitor. He betrays anyone who befriends him. He has betrayed you, it seems. He has betrayed other friends of mine.... I have known him to remove all comments of those who rebuke him."
1. Lizzy why do you make sock accounts and then carry on conversations with yourself as if you were two different people? This is disturbing.
2. Just WHO has betrayed WHOM Lizzy?
3. As for removing comments Monty is the king of such behavior!
@RedBeetle "I said you were defending irreconcilable paradox"
I simply supported Zack. That does NOT imply my endorsing everything he said. The simple truth is you quoted me out of context Monty and made it look like I was teaching an Arminian or Pelagian concept of free will when the context showed that I wasn't.
". You are no Clarkian. You should retract your lie, you Catholic-whore."
So now I am a Catholic? If YOU are a Clarkian why do you object to me uploading videos quoting Clark?
@Blogrich55. Monty is reprobate. His colors are true to his nature. He slithers around waiting for anyone to say anything contrary to his beliefs and when he spots, he pounces shredding his victim to pieces. Everyone knows that Monty is deceived and has displays no love to the brethren. His mental ascension to the work of Christ is far from salvation. Simon the sorcerer believed, wet was filled with wickedness. Monty displays the same fruit.
@ShownMercy "He slithers around waiting for anyone to say anything contrary to his beliefs and when he spots, he pounces shredding his victim to pieces."
Monty resorts to attacking a person based on sloppy comments. He intimidates. Honesty would compel a person to be sure the position he is attacking genuinely represents his opponents beliefs and NOT a badly fumbled, hastily posted comment. Monty KNOWS I believe in neither freewill nor Pelagianism. Truth is not high on his list of priorities.
@PianoMann85 "Faith, by definition, is assent to understood propositions. Not all cases of assent, even assent to Biblical propositions, are saving faith; But all saving faith is assent to one or more Biblical propositions."
FAITH AND SAVING FAITH page 118 by Dr Gordon H Clark
Tom and I are in agreement with Clark on this. Also, it is not fair to judge Monty as a reprobate. Only God knows this. We simply do not know. Thank you for your comment.
Rich, I want to publicly support you in this. I appreciate RB more than most of the commenters here I'm sure, but his treatment towards you I cannot condone. It's not only ridiculous that he has accused you of being a Pelagian, it's downright slanderous. I've turned the other way to some of his unsavory behavior in the past, but this is way over the line. RB needs recant and issue you a public apology.
Good video Brother Rich. It won't matter to Monty though. Truth isn't high on his list of priorities as far as I can tell. I have classified him as someone who belongs in the category of me not throwing pearls before swine. You cannot give what is holy to that which is unholy.
@SkiesVibrant God bless you Sister! Yes, it is one thing to correct a brother if he is wrong. It is another matter to correct his manner of saying something if he has been sloppy or appears to have contradicted himself. This must be done if we love one another. But instead of iron sharpening iron, Monty is a rude sort of rock that likes to dull the blade of the brethren. He needs prayer.
@Blogrich55 It's very easy to see the difference between someone who is teaching truth and someone who revels in maligning others within the body of Christ. I do not understand why anyone would spend so much time being hateful toward others. Being a child of the King should bring joy to our lives. Jesus paid the price.
Paul warned us about unnecessary divisions. Monty seems to delight in division & feeling superior. Pride goes before a fall, and a haughty spirit before destruction.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Rich wrote: "YOU can obey the command to believe the Gospel, Jaco."
Then he wrote: "I am NOT saying YOU have the ability to obey the command."
This is a contradiction. Note the pronoun 'you' in Rich's comments creates the context that he's teaching one of Adam's natural posterity can obey God's command. Contradicting oneself after the fact does not make one Reformed, but it shows confusion. Even after conversion, no one can, in this life, obey perfectly (Mark 9:26 Isaiah 64:6). Got Logic?
@RedBeetle This has already been explained in the video, Monty. Why are you so afraid to let Clark speak for himself? Do you think people will think Clark supported Lordship Salvation?
Richard, this is not an answer, but it is an admission on your part. I am glad that you are publicly admitting that when you say something, then you really mean it's opposite. For example, when you say "You can obey," then you mean "You cannot obey." That may come in handy for your viewers, especially when you claim to be a Calvinist, a Clarkian, and even a Christian. Like I said before, Calvinists are not called to use casuistry. Score:
@RedBeetle "Calvinists are not called to use casuistry."
This is an empty charge. You have never demonstrated that I have done so. All I have done is quote Clark in context.
You are probably too proud to admit it Monty, but you have lost this argument. o3airfilter asked me a question at least 4 times hoping I would fumble my words a little. When I did you pounced on it and used it in an attempt to prove I am a Pelagian even though you know full well that I am not.You're guilty of lying Monty.
@Blogrich55 John Calvin pronounced you a Pelagian a couple of videos back already. Did you not see that one?
I am a Calvinist, and I want to tell you something, if I was rebuked by John Calvin's writings, I would sit down and have a hard think about it, Rich - after I had a good cry about it. I would take being rebuked by Calvin very seriously indeed. You have his commentaries go and read what he has to say on Ephesians 2:10.
@GospelPerverter "John Calvin pronounced you a Pelagian a couple of videos back already. Did you not see that one?"
Lizzy, John Calvin would NOT pronounce me a Pelagian because as you and Monty both know, I am NOT one. I do NOT believe in free will. My comment to Zack was comparing Calvinism to Arminianism's heretical teaching of autonomous free will. NOTHING is outside of the sovereign control and absolute predestination of God. You and Monty BOTH know I believe this. Sadly you are both liars.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@Blogrich55 - I had to ask you the question 4 times hoping you would answer it. You are the one that showed your true colors by trying to tap dance around it. And that is what caused you to "fumble". Stop blaming others.
@o3airfilter "- I had to ask you the question 4 times.."
You HAD to ask it 4 times until you got an answer you could twist into a contradiction. When I said that the command to believe the gospel could obeyed I was referring to the principle in logic that only commands can be obeyed or disobeyed.When I wrote 'I am NOT saying YOU have the ability to obey the command' I was referring to man's fallen nature.By confusing the two you made a contradiction when there was none.Cheap lawyer's trick!
@RedBeetle Will you please explain for us what Clark meant by the quotes Rich gave in his videos? Richard did not give any commentary, just the quotes only.
@1689Baptist Great point brother! Monty has NEVER explained HOW we are using casuistry in our "according to Clark" videos. We didn't even advance any argument. All we did was quote Clark. God bless you Jeff.
@RedBeetle "Note the pronoun 'you' in Rich's comments creates the context that he's teaching one of Adam's natural posterity can obey God's command."
Monty you know full well that I am not a Pelagian. What you are really doing here is deliberately twisting my words to make me look like I am a Pelagian. The reason you are doing this is because you are upset that I uploaded the video THE RELATION BETWEEN FAITH AND WORKS according to Dr Gordon H Clark. Why don't you stop lying and be honest?
@FillTheirVoid God bless you Brother Joshua! It seems like Monty is some sort of control freak. This even extends to his purposely misrepresenting Clark as our video series endeavors to point out.
@ProclaimHisWord God bless you Brother Mark! Monty seems to have a very serious problem with pride. In our recent video on Assurance according to Dr Gordon H Clark, Clark makes a point about the importance of being humble. Nice talking to you on skype!
Anyone who knows you at all knows better than to believe that you are a pelagian, Rich. I know it's not fun to be accused of believing things you don't believe and saying things you didn't say and I hope and pray that RedBeetle will accusing people falsely.
@innocenceagain God bless you Eden:) I am thankful to God for the constant support of friends like you. It means a lot. If I have made an error I need to correct it. However, Monty twists a persons words to make them appear to believe something they don't actually believe. I too hope he stops falsely accusing the brethren.
Monty believes Clark was a pelagian due to his teaching concerning Faith and works which you quoted in your prior video. Monty & Robbins gravitated to Clark due to his definition of faith as mere assent but they have nothing further in common with Clark. Monty and Robbins have more in common with Zane Hodges, Bob Wilkins. Monty is no Calvinist. God’s method of salvation is foreign to Monty and Jacksmack77 and those that believe similarly. Monty is the great twister. Great video Rich!
Blogrich, don't waste your time on RedBeetle. He even goes after other Calvinists like Piper and the late Bahnsen. The sad thing is that e even thinks he waxes philosophical and logical! His real lord and savior is Gordon Clark as his site shows. By making a video on him you draw attention to youtube trolls. Better to leave him to his few subscribers than give him unwarranted attention.
@shamounian I appreciate your concern but I am a Clarkian as well. Monty has not been totally upfront with his teachings. Dr Gordon H Clark taught many things Monty has flatly denied. He knows this and doesn't want Lightspeed52 or myself uploading the videos giving Clark's views on certain topics. For this reason, Monty tries to twist my words to "prove" I am a Pelagian and deny total depravity. It is a lie, of course, and he knows it. Anyone who has ever watched my videos know it as well. GBU
@Blogrich55 I think you misunderstood me. I am not attacking Clark or reading his works. I only condemn an obsessive behavior with Clark or with any other uninspired man for that matter. Moreover, do you as a Clarkian condemn people like Piper?
@ObeyTheGospelOrDie Dwayne,
It is time you found out that this traitor (Richard Jackson) you are hobnobbing with, was, not long ago, warning us all (myself and Monty included - MANY times on SKYPE), that we were NOT to trust you. He told us this on NUMEROUS ocassions. Why do you think I never answered your calls on SKYPE, especially after the night you asked me to keep your dear wife company while you were at work because she was lonely. Now he is "God blessing" you? You snakes all hiss alike!
Afrikitty 1 year ago
@Afrikitty "It is time you found out that this traitor..."
Now you play the hypocrite too Liz. YOU are the one who started the CrumpetCruncher account just to run Bianca off of YouTube, remember? YOU also started the GospelPerverter to run Greg off of YouTube.Yet you didn't want anyone to know. Have you forgotten? You even posted an extremely WEIRD comment on my home page from the CrumpetCruncher bragging that you had banished her to the dessert in Arizona. Remember any of THAT Liz? Fess up!
Blogrich55 1 year ago
@Blogrich55 Touche, Richard - Just look at yourself - Just look at yourself.
I HAVE fessed up to GREG HIMSELF regarding my involvement in the GospelPerverter channel. And Richard, HE has forgiven me. So, don't make accusations you know nothing about. Unlike you, I don't do things I am ashamed to own up to. Regarding the "weird" comment as to CrumpetCruncher - errrr, weird, Richard? Really? You laughed your head off because Bianca was no longer coming on your channel and hounding you. Sheeesh.
Afrikitty 1 year ago
@Afrikitty "So, don't make accusations..."
First of all Liz: CONGRATULATIONS! You are doing an excellent job of running interference for Monty, shifting the focus of the debate by attacking the messenger.
1. I was NOT laughing because "Bianca was no longer..." but at your THINKING you had banished her from YT
2. You NEVER wanted to own up to GPerverter BUT my involvement was obvious.So guess who got blamed every time you made a weird comment using that channel? Me of course!Typical of You!
Blogrich55 1 year ago
@ObeyTheGospelOrDie,
Dewayne,
I see you are still very busy trying to look Reformed. You are not Reformed. You are not even a Particular Baptist. You are a coward and a liar. You were caught teaching heresy time and again in videos and comment sections here on youtube. At no point did you or your theologymatters101 team ever retract a single heresy.
RedBeetle 1 year ago
@RedBeetle What heresy am I supposed to retract? When are you going to answer Richard's question? Do you disagree with Clark, are works obligatory? Clark certainly did! What do Presbyterians Believe, pages, 163 -164. And so does the WMCF ch.16, section 3.
1689Baptist 1 year ago 5
@RedBeetle "..You are not Reformed..."
Monty you love to go around accusing others of being heretics but you yourself hold to the heresy of antinomianism according Charles Hodge, A A Hodge, and Dr Gordon H Clark (to name a few) as they understand the Westminster Confession of Faith and the Bible. See WCF Chapter 16 section iii. You might also read what Clark says in his book What Do Presbyterians Believe pages 162-164 as well. Your hyper-Law/Gospel distinction position is antinomianism!
Blogrich55 1 year ago 5
@ObeyTheGospelOrDie God bless you Dwayne! Praise God for leading your dad into all truth!
Blogrich55 1 year ago
@Blogrich55,
Let me remind you, Richard, how you recently told Liz and I that Dwayne Sweatman was pretending to be a Clarkian. You said you thought he was a liar fishing for information about Clark for the purpose of misrepresenting his books. Did you lie about this too, Richard? I told you weeks ago Dwayne had never publicly retracted any of his lies, and you agreed that THAT alone was proof not to trust him. He even lied publicly about not having the ObeyTheGospelOrDie account--LOL!
RedBeetle 1 year ago
@RedBeetle "Let me remind you, Richard..."
No Monty, let me remind YOU that you have NEVER answered whether or not you agree with Clark as to the obligatory nature of good works. A simple yes or no will suffice.
Your personal attacks and attempts to stir up strife in order to avoid the question and change the subject are pathetic.
Blogrich55 1 year ago 4
Wait, are you telling me that Monty is a liar?
crazypills2 1 year ago
This is the second time I have seen you do this to this friend of yours. Last time I rebuked you and you removed every single one of my comments. You left the comment section looking as though I had never been there. You are a coward, Sir, of the worst degree.
It will only be a matter of time before all these cuckolds will find out what and who you are. I hope Mr. Collier never takes you seriously again. You are indeed a Roman Catholic whore and true to that nature, you are a traitor to boot!
ChristEnduredForMe 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ChristEnduredForMe,
I say, good work, sister.
Pip, pip, cheerio!
RedBeetle 1 year ago
@RedBeetle Why, thank you. Your name is Monty ~ if you will, please allow me to call you such ~ true peacemakers are not sissies who mollycoddle the masses. They are unpopular lions, as was our Lion of Judah and His prophets. They stand on the ramparts and shout out the truth of God. They are hated, as was our Lord. They were sawn asunder, thrown to lions, tarred with pitch and lit as torches to regale the people. They were thrown down wells, drowned, and hounded by mad kings. You are not alone.
ChristEnduredForMe 1 year ago
@ChristEnduredForMe "true peacemakers are not sissies who mollycoddle the masses. They are unpopular lions...hounded...You are not alone."
I fail to see, Bethany, just how lying about people makes someone like Monty a peacemaker or martyr.
Blogrich55 1 year ago 23
@ChristEnduredForMe "you are a traitor to boot!"
So is this another one of your sock accounts like GospelPerverter or CrumpetCruncher Lizzy?
Blogrich55 1 year ago 13
People should be contacted for clarification before such videos as Monty's are done against them. Too often he uses acontextual citations.
Studier101 1 year ago 24
@Studier101 "People should be contacted for clarification before such videos as Monty's are done against them. Too often he uses acontextual citations."
Monty was in contact with me via skype quite a lot. He knows very well what I believe. He is upset about lightspeed52 and I uploading videos quoting Clark. He know I do NOT believe in free will, common grace, and I am NOT a Pelagian. God bless you.
Blogrich55 1 year ago 24
Question:
Is Monty Collier "rofyle"?
doctorh2005 1 year ago
@doctorh2005
"Question: Is Monty Collier 'rofyle'?"
LOL Excellent question Dave! I have wondered the same myself many times. God bless! Have you seen Smoly Hoax'es new video SNOW WAY JOSÉ yet?
Blogrich55 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Blogrich55,
Are you now whoring around with doctorh2005? LOL, he never retracted his claim that we're justified by an inward righteousness, Rich. I think you and doctorh2005 would make a good match. You both claim to be Reformed, while both get caught pushing Pelagianism. After getting busted, you both redefine your terms and claim your opponents have misunderstood and removed your claims from context! How Van Tilian! Those who would sale God's truth for popularity have their reward.
RedBeetle 1 year ago
@RedBeetle "You both claim to be Reformed, while both get caught pushing Pelagianism."
I have already given my explanation in the video Monty. Honesty and integrity do not seem to be high on your priority list. You value winning at all cost more. Hence you use dirty debate tactics like a lawyer might use in court to harass a witness. You know very well I am not a Pelagian. You've done all of this is because I uploaded Clark's comments on the relation between faith and works.
Blogrich55 1 year ago 23
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Blogrich55,
Your affirmation of doctorh2005 also logically contradicts your claim of being Reformed.
You are violating 2 John 9-11.
Remember, doctorh2005 teaches we are justified by an infused righteousness.
Like you, he never retracted his heresy. Stop partaking of his heresy.
Got Logic?
RedBeetle 1 year ago
@RedBeetle "Stop partaking of his heresy."
Once again, merely befriending someone does NOT imply a blanket endorsement of everything they say. You keep making this logical blunder Monty. You need to consider James 4:10-11.
You have never explained why our uploading the video THE RELATI0N BETWEEN FAITH AND WORKS according to Dr Gordon H Clark has upset you so much. How did we engage in casuistry by quoting Clark in context? You have never answered this question. What are you afraid of?
Blogrich55 1 year ago 30
3:43
Rofyle is an theological idiot.
He thinks we are actually justified BEFORE we believe, when Scripture clearly states that faith is the instrumental cause of justification being applied to us through the Holy Spirit - and that we are not "justified" BEFORE faith, but UPON/BY/THROUGH faith.
Don't worry about him. I dealt with him in a previous comment section.
doctorh2005 1 year ago
My gosh...this guy needs to grow the heck up...He is giving Calvinism a HIDEOUS name. He is constantly looking for Christians to hunt for not being Calvinistic enough. Someone mistates or slightly disagrees with his mechanism by which God saves, RedBeetle casts these blood bought believers into the pit of hell. My word, RedBeetle, grow up!
msm1876 1 year ago 23
@msm1876 God bless you brother. I really like your vids on the cults. Keep up the good work. Suggestion: smile once in a while LOL You frown a LOT bro!
Blogrich55 1 year ago
@msm1876 - Is this "mechanism" the Gospel?
o3airfilter 1 year ago
@o3airfilter The gospel is the proclaiming of Christ's death, burial, and resurrection for our sins...and us believing on this (and him) to be saved.
Now, if a person has a true living faith, he will be baptised. He will repent. He will do good works.
Most Protestants (of which I am one) believe that belief is the sole root of justification. I do too. But what about Lutherans? They believe one must be baptised to have sins forgiven. Are they heretics? cont
msm1876 1 year ago
@o3airfilter And have you read the Early Church Fathers? Next to none believed that Faith was the sole root of justification. The concept of justification was not heavily elucidated in the early church...very little was said until...mmmm....I'm thinking Augustine and Jerome? So was Justin Martyr a heretic because he didn't affirm Sola Fide? I'm thinking not. He may have been mistaken on mechanistically, HOW Christ saves...but assuredly, he would say, it is CHrist that saves.
You follow?
msm1876 1 year ago
@msm1876 - I have not asked for a defense of your position. You have not answered my question. Please read my question again. Or should I repeat it?
o3airfilter 1 year ago
What else is new...
You are as pelegian as Lady Gaga is a virgin.
My name should've been on that list of being falsely accused. But Ok, I and many others have been.
My take on this is: no more YT wars and simply ignore the guy. He likes the attention and it tickles his ego (pride) when someone goes in on his childish nonsense.
daafith 1 year ago 24
@daafith "You are as pelegian as Lady Gaga is a virgin."
ROFLOL Sorry to have left you off the list but if I were to include the entire roll call, I would STILL be making this video. God bless you David (and your new wife.)
Blogrich55 1 year ago 9
Come on GUYs could ya'll stop playing games..... Block each other and go your on ways..... I like you both but this is getting old.....
youratm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I dunno I thought Beetle pointed out the truth about Zach Kueker.
OIObserver 1 year ago
@OIObserver Which time? Monty has flat out lied about ALL of us-- Zack, Mark Aponte, and myself. He is obviously lying in this situation. He knows well I don't believe what he accuses me of. He's lied about Mark Sennet and others as well.
Blogrich55 1 year ago
@Blogrich55 "Monty has flat out lied about ALL of us---" Really, Richard? - Hmmmm - And their names are Legion, and they are many.
Aaaaaahahahahahah Ha ha ha ha. So, you don't block people, hayyyy, Richie. I see the mean Kitty is blocked. What happened, hayyy? She get too close to the bone for ya, Richie? Shame on you!
You should hold onto your errors BRAVELY and defend them to the hilt, which means that you should allow mean Kitties to challenge you without you attacking her person.
GospelPerverter 1 year ago
@GospelPerverter So you FINALLY have the integrity to "admit" that you are the owner of the GospelPerverter, ehhh Lizzy? Your comment here is meaningless. It is drivel inspired by your sick, fawning, and simpering adulation of Monty. Debating aside, Lizzy, Monty proves NOTHING by jumping on sloppy wording and trying to use it to accuse someone of believing that which they do NOT believe. It won't work. I am not impressed. God is not honored by bullying and lies. You are BLOCKED Lizzy!
Blogrich55 1 year ago 17
@Blogrich
Rich+5
Liz & Bug (Tag Team) -5
Well spoken Rich and with grace. When the bug does not let you define what you believe you know you’re dealing with a duplicitous person who is more interested in silly gotcha games that are ungodly. For all this we still do not know what Paul and Peter meant by disobey the Gospel. Perhaps we do but we must abandon the antinomians Sola Logic and go with Sola Scriptura and we will be on firmer ground to answer this question. Monty is no Clarkian.
clausewitz777 1 year ago
@clausewitz777 wrote:
"For all this we STILL DO NOT KNOW WHAT PAUL AND PETER MEANT BY DISOBEY THE GOSPEL."
This is not surprising from a Van Tilian. As the Bible says: But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost (2 Corinithians 3:3). If you knew and believed basic Law / Gospel Distinction, you know what is meant by disobeying the Gospel.
RedBeetle 1 year ago
I personally am embarrassed to have someone like Monty claim the title of Christian or Calvinist. Likewise, Monty, more than any other professing Christian here on YT that I am familiar with (Calvinist and Non) is the most deceptive and vile person, and that consistently. The only other people here on YT that I have seen rebuked, corrected and called to repent more than Monty are the doctrinal heretics. That says quite a bit! He is a liar and all liars will have their place in the lake of fire.
fivepointbaptist 1 year ago 45
@fivepointbaptist I have actually defended Monty in the past, Chris but this time I am speechless and can't justify looking the other way or making excuses for him. He has gone way too far. I don't mean just to me personally but BBirchin, yourself, Reformed Lou and a host of brothers and sisters. Still perusing your paper bro. God bless.
Blogrich55 1 year ago
@Blogrich55 Did you receive my updated version?
fivepointbaptist 1 year ago
@fivepointbaptist "Did you receive my updated version?"
I will check my email for it.
Blogrich55 1 year ago
@fivepointbaptist,
You still pushing the books of Federal Vision leader Douglas Wilson? Blogrich55 told me before several people he was going to explain to you why Doug Wilson was a heretic and a racist. Did he? Didn't you know Wilson denies Sola Fide? Wilson's booklet "Southern Slavery: As It Was," is pro-slavery and racist. I asked you about this when you were cheering doctorh2005, who, like Wilson, also claims we're justified by an inward righteousness. Oh, John Calvin rejected slavery.
RedBeetle 1 year ago
@RedBeetle "You still pushing the books of Federal Vision leader Douglas Wilson?"
Any more rabbit holes you care to scamper down RedHerring? This is not the point of the video. You have also lied and accused me of believing in free will when you know better.
Blogrich55 1 year ago 19
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Blogrich55,
You wrote the following to Zach in his comment section:
"Yes, we believe in free will and human responsibility."
See my video "Defending Calvinism Exposed and Refuted" at the 20:45 mark.
Zach was teaching the heresy of irreconcilable paradox, like Van Til.
Gordon H. Clark rejected that, for unlike you, he was a Calvinist.
You are a liar, Rich. I can quote you word for word, like you just saw.
The difference between you and I is that I can quote you teaching heresy, chump.
RedBeetle 1 year ago
@RedBeetle "The difference between you and I is that I can quote you teaching heresy, chump."
No you can't. This is what I said:
"Yes, we believe in free will and human responsibility. What the Arminian believes in is what we would call autonomous free will. That is a will that is totally outside of God's control...autonomous. God's sovereignty even extends to the free will choices of His creatures."
Once again you have ignored the context. I was NOT defending an autonomous free will.
Blogrich55 1 year ago 16
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Blogrich55,
I said you were defending irreconcilable paradox, chump.
That's what Zack was teaching. Free will and determinism are logically incompatible, and you know this. You also know that this is why Van Tilians claim that Sovereignty and responsibility are "mysterious." Your equivocations only work on the ignorant youtubers like fivepointbaptist, clausewitz, and daafith. You are no Clarkian. You should retract your lie, you Catholic-whore.
RedBeetle 1 year ago
@RedBeetle At first I thought your language was a bit strong, but I have dealt with this man before. He is a traitor. He betrays anyone who befriends him. He has betrayed you, it seems. He has betrayed other friends of mine and I want to tell you, he is going to betray every other person supporting him in this comment section. I have known him to remove all comments of those who rebuke him. He is a lilly-livered coward who can be trusted with nothing. Your language, Sir, is not strong enough!
ChristEnduredForMe 1 year ago
@ChristEnduredForMe "but I have dealt with this man before. He is a traitor. He betrays anyone who befriends him. He has betrayed you, it seems. He has betrayed other friends of mine.... I have known him to remove all comments of those who rebuke him."
1. Lizzy why do you make sock accounts and then carry on conversations with yourself as if you were two different people? This is disturbing.
2. Just WHO has betrayed WHOM Lizzy?
3. As for removing comments Monty is the king of such behavior!
Blogrich55 1 year ago 23
@RedBeetle "I said you were defending irreconcilable paradox"
I simply supported Zack. That does NOT imply my endorsing everything he said. The simple truth is you quoted me out of context Monty and made it look like I was teaching an Arminian or Pelagian concept of free will when the context showed that I wasn't.
". You are no Clarkian. You should retract your lie, you Catholic-whore."
So now I am a Catholic? If YOU are a Clarkian why do you object to me uploading videos quoting Clark?
Blogrich55 1 year ago 26
@Blogrich55. Monty is reprobate. His colors are true to his nature. He slithers around waiting for anyone to say anything contrary to his beliefs and when he spots, he pounces shredding his victim to pieces. Everyone knows that Monty is deceived and has displays no love to the brethren. His mental ascension to the work of Christ is far from salvation. Simon the sorcerer believed, wet was filled with wickedness. Monty displays the same fruit.
God bless
ShownMercy 1 year ago 15
@ShownMercy "He slithers around waiting for anyone to say anything contrary to his beliefs and when he spots, he pounces shredding his victim to pieces."
Monty resorts to attacking a person based on sloppy comments. He intimidates. Honesty would compel a person to be sure the position he is attacking genuinely represents his opponents beliefs and NOT a badly fumbled, hastily posted comment. Monty KNOWS I believe in neither freewill nor Pelagianism. Truth is not high on his list of priorities.
Blogrich55 1 year ago 14
@ShownMercy: "His mental ascension to the work of Christ is far from salvation."
I guess, then, Monty will be one of those poor souls who misses heaven by 12 inches. *rolls eyes*
PianoMann85 1 year ago
@PianoMann85 "Faith, by definition, is assent to understood propositions. Not all cases of assent, even assent to Biblical propositions, are saving faith; But all saving faith is assent to one or more Biblical propositions."
FAITH AND SAVING FAITH page 118 by Dr Gordon H Clark
Tom and I are in agreement with Clark on this. Also, it is not fair to judge Monty as a reprobate. Only God knows this. We simply do not know. Thank you for your comment.
Blogrich55 1 year ago 3
@Blogrich55
Rich, I want to publicly support you in this. I appreciate RB more than most of the commenters here I'm sure, but his treatment towards you I cannot condone. It's not only ridiculous that he has accused you of being a Pelagian, it's downright slanderous. I've turned the other way to some of his unsavory behavior in the past, but this is way over the line. RB needs recant and issue you a public apology.
PianoMann85 1 year ago 17
@PianoMann85 Thanks for your support and integrity brother. I too have always supported RB and even made excuses for him in the past. God bless you.
Blogrich55 1 year ago
Good video Brother Rich. It won't matter to Monty though. Truth isn't high on his list of priorities as far as I can tell. I have classified him as someone who belongs in the category of me not throwing pearls before swine. You cannot give what is holy to that which is unholy.
Keep teaching the gospel. God Bless.
SkiesVibrant 1 year ago 17
@SkiesVibrant God bless you Sister! Yes, it is one thing to correct a brother if he is wrong. It is another matter to correct his manner of saying something if he has been sloppy or appears to have contradicted himself. This must be done if we love one another. But instead of iron sharpening iron, Monty is a rude sort of rock that likes to dull the blade of the brethren. He needs prayer.
Blogrich55 1 year ago 3
@Blogrich55 It's very easy to see the difference between someone who is teaching truth and someone who revels in maligning others within the body of Christ. I do not understand why anyone would spend so much time being hateful toward others. Being a child of the King should bring joy to our lives. Jesus paid the price.
Paul warned us about unnecessary divisions. Monty seems to delight in division & feeling superior. Pride goes before a fall, and a haughty spirit before destruction.
SkiesVibrant 1 year ago 15
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Rich wrote: "YOU can obey the command to believe the Gospel, Jaco."
Then he wrote: "I am NOT saying YOU have the ability to obey the command."
This is a contradiction. Note the pronoun 'you' in Rich's comments creates the context that he's teaching one of Adam's natural posterity can obey God's command. Contradicting oneself after the fact does not make one Reformed, but it shows confusion. Even after conversion, no one can, in this life, obey perfectly (Mark 9:26 Isaiah 64:6). Got Logic?
RedBeetle 1 year ago
@RedBeetle This has already been explained in the video, Monty. Why are you so afraid to let Clark speak for himself? Do you think people will think Clark supported Lordship Salvation?
SmolyHoax 1 year ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@SmolyHoax,
Richard, this is not an answer, but it is an admission on your part. I am glad that you are publicly admitting that when you say something, then you really mean it's opposite. For example, when you say "You can obey," then you mean "You cannot obey." That may come in handy for your viewers, especially when you claim to be a Calvinist, a Clarkian, and even a Christian. Like I said before, Calvinists are not called to use casuistry. Score:
RedBeetle 3
Blogrich55 0
RedBeetle 1 year ago
@RedBeetle "Calvinists are not called to use casuistry."
This is an empty charge. You have never demonstrated that I have done so. All I have done is quote Clark in context.
You are probably too proud to admit it Monty, but you have lost this argument. o3airfilter asked me a question at least 4 times hoping I would fumble my words a little. When I did you pounced on it and used it in an attempt to prove I am a Pelagian even though you know full well that I am not.You're guilty of lying Monty.
Blogrich55 1 year ago 10
@Blogrich55 John Calvin pronounced you a Pelagian a couple of videos back already. Did you not see that one?
I am a Calvinist, and I want to tell you something, if I was rebuked by John Calvin's writings, I would sit down and have a hard think about it, Rich - after I had a good cry about it. I would take being rebuked by Calvin very seriously indeed. You have his commentaries go and read what he has to say on Ephesians 2:10.
GospelPerverter 1 year ago
@GospelPerverter "John Calvin pronounced you a Pelagian a couple of videos back already. Did you not see that one?"
Lizzy, John Calvin would NOT pronounce me a Pelagian because as you and Monty both know, I am NOT one. I do NOT believe in free will. My comment to Zack was comparing Calvinism to Arminianism's heretical teaching of autonomous free will. NOTHING is outside of the sovereign control and absolute predestination of God. You and Monty BOTH know I believe this. Sadly you are both liars.
Blogrich55 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Blogrich55 - I had to ask you the question 4 times hoping you would answer it. You are the one that showed your true colors by trying to tap dance around it. And that is what caused you to "fumble". Stop blaming others.
o3airfilter 1 year ago
@o3airfilter - Oh, and then you blocked me. lol
o3airfilter 1 year ago
@o3airfilter "- Oh, and then you blocked me. lol"
I should have blocked you earlier. Ask Monty how that works. You are a trouble maker.
Blogrich55 1 year ago 14
@o3airfilter "- I had to ask you the question 4 times.."
You HAD to ask it 4 times until you got an answer you could twist into a contradiction. When I said that the command to believe the gospel could obeyed I was referring to the principle in logic that only commands can be obeyed or disobeyed.When I wrote 'I am NOT saying YOU have the ability to obey the command' I was referring to man's fallen nature.By confusing the two you made a contradiction when there was none.Cheap lawyer's trick!
Blogrich55 1 year ago 26
@RedBeetle Will you please explain for us what Clark meant by the quotes Rich gave in his videos? Richard did not give any commentary, just the quotes only.
1689Baptist 1 year ago 7
@1689Baptist Great point brother! Monty has NEVER explained HOW we are using casuistry in our "according to Clark" videos. We didn't even advance any argument. All we did was quote Clark. God bless you Jeff.
Blogrich55 1 year ago 6
@RedBeetle "Note the pronoun 'you' in Rich's comments creates the context that he's teaching one of Adam's natural posterity can obey God's command."
Monty you know full well that I am not a Pelagian. What you are really doing here is deliberately twisting my words to make me look like I am a Pelagian. The reason you are doing this is because you are upset that I uploaded the video THE RELATION BETWEEN FAITH AND WORKS according to Dr Gordon H Clark. Why don't you stop lying and be honest?
Blogrich55 1 year ago 10
Monty ridicules anyone who doesn't precisely agree with him personally on every single issue everywhere at all times. It's unfair and ridiculous.
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago 12
@FillTheirVoid God bless you Brother Joshua! It seems like Monty is some sort of control freak. This even extends to his purposely misrepresenting Clark as our video series endeavors to point out.
Blogrich55 1 year ago
May God bless you brother Rich.
ProclaimHisWord 1 year ago
@ProclaimHisWord God bless you Brother Mark! Monty seems to have a very serious problem with pride. In our recent video on Assurance according to Dr Gordon H Clark, Clark makes a point about the importance of being humble. Nice talking to you on skype!
Blogrich55 1 year ago 10
Anyone who knows you at all knows better than to believe that you are a pelagian, Rich. I know it's not fun to be accused of believing things you don't believe and saying things you didn't say and I hope and pray that RedBeetle will accusing people falsely.
God bless you Rich.
innocenceagain 1 year ago 46
@innocenceagain God bless you Eden:) I am thankful to God for the constant support of friends like you. It means a lot. If I have made an error I need to correct it. However, Monty twists a persons words to make them appear to believe something they don't actually believe. I too hope he stops falsely accusing the brethren.
Blogrich55 1 year ago
Monty believes Clark was a pelagian due to his teaching concerning Faith and works which you quoted in your prior video. Monty & Robbins gravitated to Clark due to his definition of faith as mere assent but they have nothing further in common with Clark. Monty and Robbins have more in common with Zane Hodges, Bob Wilkins. Monty is no Calvinist. God’s method of salvation is foreign to Monty and Jacksmack77 and those that believe similarly. Monty is the great twister. Great video Rich!
clausewitz777 1 year ago
@Blogrich55 And I am thankful for your support and friendship as well, Rich.:) I'm praying for Monty.
innocenceagain 1 year ago
Monty is extremly a divisive individual. I pray that God will humble him.
October31st1517 1 year ago 15
@October31st1517 Hey bro. isn't it about time you made a new video? Them there hairy tics are gitten thick out thar.
1689Baptist 1 year ago
@October31st1517 God bless you Brother. Only the Holy Spirit can do that. I too pray for this.
Blogrich55 1 year ago
Blogrich, don't waste your time on RedBeetle. He even goes after other Calvinists like Piper and the late Bahnsen. The sad thing is that e even thinks he waxes philosophical and logical! His real lord and savior is Gordon Clark as his site shows. By making a video on him you draw attention to youtube trolls. Better to leave him to his few subscribers than give him unwarranted attention.
shamounian 1 year ago
@shamounian I appreciate your concern but I am a Clarkian as well. Monty has not been totally upfront with his teachings. Dr Gordon H Clark taught many things Monty has flatly denied. He knows this and doesn't want Lightspeed52 or myself uploading the videos giving Clark's views on certain topics. For this reason, Monty tries to twist my words to "prove" I am a Pelagian and deny total depravity. It is a lie, of course, and he knows it. Anyone who has ever watched my videos know it as well. GBU
Blogrich55 1 year ago
@Blogrich55 I think you misunderstood me. I am not attacking Clark or reading his works. I only condemn an obsessive behavior with Clark or with any other uninspired man for that matter. Moreover, do you as a Clarkian condemn people like Piper?
shamounian 1 year ago