Over 50 years ago he warned us. Now what do we have? Secret ballots, declarations of war without approval, NDAA allowing the secret arrest, trail, execution or assassination of U.S. citizens. Can you say "Patriot Act"? If you feel that sickness growing in the pit of your stomach, don't be alarmed.... it's normal; waking up can be painful.
Two things..Who on earth was JFK referring to? Why was he not naming this grave danger?.Had he not in the past been only to ready to tell us about nefarious deeds by the Soviets, Castro..China..I believe that if we understand who he was addressing and do some study we will come to the conclusion that it can only be one group He was addressing the Newspaper Publishers of America.They knew who he was warning us about. They are the very same people who own America to this day Rothschild is the name
0:56 "And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be ceased upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment." John Fucking Kennedy - what a bad ass.
The series 'V' is a fictional TV show that explains (revelation of method) what is really going on with the evil UFO creatures (real spirit Lucifer & spirit demon gods) on this earth. The John Carpenter movie 'THEY LIVE' is actually a docudrama that explained this fact about the UFO creatures 25 years ago, but most people care more about the foolish religion of sports than truth, freedom or saving their own lives! I have evidence.
People keep defending their betrayers. Many willingly celebrate these wildly wicked weird witchcraft holidays from the weathered old Roman religion of rapists. Are these holidays the beautiful side of evil?...Well, evil, is still evil no matter how it is served to you. The Lord God shall a put curse on all who celebrate these holidays of Hell. You and your children' s children shall suffer plague and death. The Holy Bible explains this fact.
This was a US PRESIDENT saying this, he knew something that no other president after him knew and maybe he tried to alert us but was killed too soon. People like me and many others need to stop being dismissed as lunatics and 'conspiracy theorists' because I am fed up of it and I'm tired of being intimidated into a corner by a majority of brain dead patriots who watch Jersey Shore for a pass time and cannot think critically to save their lives.
I REFER TO THIS SENTENCE: FIRST read .READ the WHOLE Speech !!! He was ASKING The Press to VOLUNTARILY Censure the News ! ww w.blatantworld. c om/ speech/ jfk_the_word_secrecy_is_repugnant. h tml kldirectv2 hace 1 mes
-----------
JFK words ,10 days after, bay of pigs treason by the Press ! informing worldwide in their papers,about the , US Forces number,Strategy of invasion, and even
a guidance misile system !!! War procedures,allows president to control press !!!
This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President--two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy." ~JFK
THIS IS THE PARAGRAPH "BEFORE" THE PART OF THE SPEECH,,, YOUTUBE , LEFT OUT
@kldirectv2 : you mad ? JFK is speaking 10 days after Bay of Pigs failure,since Press treason,that informed
worlwide ,all US Forces,Dates of invasion,Strategies,and a secret misile guidance system,that had to be changed. Press media owners are "guilty as charged" ,and JFK could execute them or hang them for high treason, he did not, and ended in Dallas with 6 bullets inside and 1 poisoned dart in neck, financed by this guys,who betrayed him,and us citizens . FED was in danger cos JFK ?
Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But the Oil coporations life depends on covering this up,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
This speech PROVES the existence and the guilt of the Illuminati. It PROVES everything that's going wrong UNTIL TODAY. Governments don't exist anymore it's all an illusion. Wake the fuck up...
@Jayn0o Shut the fuck up you stupid kid reaming in your own world.. you have no idea how Governments work so shut the fuck up and go to Law school bfore you start playing some fucking computer games.... GROW UP..
@GraphiteGum Look at what you just wrote. Full of assumptions and insults and you don't even know me. Shows what kind of person you are also shows how evolved you are. I sincerely hope your 13/19 if you are past that you need help...
JFK was what this world needed. he went against what all other presidents have/are doing. being puppets for the elite. WHY ELSE WOULD THIS MAN BE ASSASSINATED?!!?!?!! THE ELITE KNEW THE AWAKENING WAS COMING! THEY HAD TO GET THIS MAN OUT OF OFFICE SO THEY MURDERED HIM! PLEASE PEOPLE WAKE UP BEFORE ITS TOO LATE
Do you think that it is possible for a Socialist Workers Party to rise to power electorally in the 2012 elections, since Republicans and Democrats are so evil? or do americans have to wait for 2016 elections for a socialist party to govern the USA? Or do we have to overthrow the US government in order for USA to become socialist?
@maxistsocialist you wont get a chance....read your bible people fuck! revelations if your lazy but the whole thing tells you everything you need to know. The daughter of chaldea the mystery babylon harlot sits in new york the statue of liberty is nimrods wife! they do take us. But in the end they get theres but not without the 7 yrs of tribulations...stay strong people
@Airsoftcleaner duuuuh! many have. mostly the fuckin bible! only now america is listning! it took a hero pres do die and peeps only getting it now...it makes no difference now there plans are solid...only those who resist will be accepted by or creators when the time comes. no to the chip!
@adznz11 Well it was just shocking was all but I guess with this secret gang shit thats going on today I shouldn't be too shocked.(And yes I said Gangs because that's what they are)
@Airsoftcleaner It's not a gang. It's a secret society WAY more organized than a gang... A society within a society that controls everything. YES everything.
I do believe JFK was the president during the Cuban Missile Crisis. The CMC was the main showdown between the world powers in the cold war. The USSR left Cuba with the missiles.
To compare JFK to Bush is a horrible mistake. JFK was killed because he didn't support going to war. The only people who benefits in a war are the medias and the weapon industry.
Bush is weak and a puppet. Just listen to the way they speak.
He was assassinated because he could have helped the society, but of course the gouverment and the sercret corporations dident like that. Freaking freaks...
@Hodak55 he was killed for what he knew about them....how do you think you get to be a priesident?????? diff was he had a concience...he said no! and he paid
Jackie Kennedy, Mrs.Connolly and the SS Men are all fortunate that they were not struck. Hitting them by accident would have been quite possible... as was the case with John Connolly -- who was more directly in the line of fire (but so was a SS Agent).
One man could never be Lucky enough to conduct an assassination of a president, especially American Pres, even in that time. There were higher powers involved, Infact it is heck of alot bigger than just one man killing JFK. Higher power structures in the US, believe that nations and societies exist to make war. And that without it, the "Nation-state" in a modern sense would crumble.
You believe one man could not conduct an assassination of a president. You need to tell that to the people who were shot when there was an attempt on Reagan. Had Hinkley been a better shot, Reagan would be dead. One man. Insane. Alone.
To imagine one man cannot do such things is just imaginary claptrap contradicted by 140 years of evidence.
More like 4 decades of facts that contradict the lone gunman theory. I am consistently baffled by people who can watch know goverment conspiracies like Project popeye, Watergate, Iran/contra, Castro assasination attempts that were first denied but later admitted by the CIA, etc, and say, without reservation that our government would not lie to us. Do we need to sit you down in front of the CIA director and have him write it out for you.- cause they won't. At any point do think outside the box.
I also think that there was a very high probability that Oswald would have failed to kill Kennedy. His first shot missed. His second shot was bad but not fatal by any means. His third fatal shot, nearly was a miss. But he probably had time to get one more shot off if it had missed -- but by then the car would really have been moving fast and farther away.
I think Oswald may have been clinically depressed. I think after a period of multiple job losses, dislocation and unemployment, he started seeking fame as a man who killed other famous people.
I think, had he gotten away with killing Kennedy, he would have killed someone else -- LBJ, Governor Wallace, or McNamara.
Only two things ever made me think that there could have been two shooters.
1. "Back and to the left"
2. Trajectory studies that may have involved another building.
I believe that back and to the left is still partly mysterious but 80% explanable with shots from the rear and I believe trajectory studies pretty much cinch the source being Oswald's nest.
Yes but what Im trying to ask you is, you think it was just as simple as "One man," simply planning the day/time, going out and doing the shooting?? Nothing about any other source's Involvement? or about him being a "Patsy." Nothing about the presidents security being cut down?? Nothing about any Government cover ups?? You just think he went out and made some perfect shot/kills on the President, Its as simple as that to you??
Yes, I think it was as simple as one man with a sort of combination of about 6 months and 1 week of planning. No other sources involved, just this lying communist loser. Its that simple. Oswald was too much of a loser and too much of a loner to be "with" someone. I think he did love his wife though.
I do not think his shots were perfect. They were probably not as good as he was actually capable of doing, but they were OK.
His shots were perfect If he managed to get a head shot kill on the President. I do think you are way too out there, to just think "One man," was capable of murdering the president, alone. I therefore cannot agree with your opinion, plus you havnt even explained JFK security, or anything I mentioned. You just seem mainly focused on Oswald.
I think his head shot was an "excellent" shot but it was very close to being a "miss". The truth is, there was some luck involved.
Throughout history...whenever any other President was murdered... it was ALWAYS just one man alone. And in the most recent case where he failed... it was one man, alone.
It is not ridiculous that one man acting alone could do this. It is standard operating procedure.
"Standard Operating Procedure," Im sure I've heard that from a film. Oswald committed the shooting is fair enough, but just like terrorists attacked the WTC, and Pentagon, there were higher levels of power, that allowed these perpetrators to do what they did. It is known that JFK, wanted to deconstruct, even destroy the CIA. And he was against war in South-East Asia. Alot of his views, were criticized by the establishment,
The higher levels of power for the terrorists on 9/11 was Khalid Sheik Mohammed. For Oswald, there was no higher level of power. He operated as the lone loser he was.
Kennedy not only did NOT want to deconstruct the CIA, he grew it during his administration -- because he used them to enhance his new war in South East Asia.
CIA grew after, because JFK wanted to deconstruct it. JFK was a very modern President, who was more in touch with the youth of that era, than any other president before. Alot of his Ideals, polices, were very ambitious, maybe he was even naive, he was changing the country, and alot of "figures," disagreed with his methods of thinking. They classed him as a "radicalist," scared that if he carried on, he could change America for good, and that where would those changes lead in the future.
We can go on arguing these points forever, all I'll say is that you are wrong, It went like this you will always say opposite. And to tell you truth Im getting tired of saying the same things, how can you say JFK more or less changed nothing?? I almost get the feeling you never liked the man. You are at one end of a spectrum, certain things you class as myth, nonsense, just because you cant fully "explain" them.
First of all JFK was not in Presidency that long, but he did encourage progress of the Space Race. His carefull negotiations with Khrushchev, brought the "Cuban Missile Crisis" to a safe end. He did alot to help end Racial Discrimination, he proposed a Tax Reform, Income Tax cuts. The Economy actually turned around and prospered during Kennedy's administration. He supported Civil Rights and Racial Integration at a time when there was strong Racial Segregation in America.
1000 days is a long time. James K Polk was president only 4 years and yet he accomplished 100% of his goals.
Kennedy's "careful" negotiations nearly got us in a shooting war with the Russians. It has been hyped as Kennedy's greatest moment. In reality it was a disaster and we are lucky the Russians had cooler heads.
He ACCOMPLISHED very little. You want to brag on what he "proposed" or "supported". I am talking about EFFECTIVENESS.
Im not bragging on anything, Just giving you facts on the Important things he did, and helped the country achieve. All the things I mentioned, were very affective, If you cant see that, then I cant do anything else about it.
You mean, he was a Womanizer, and I'd say he did his Job better in the short time he was in office, than what G W Bush did in his whole time in Presidencey. And I'd expect you to agree with that, but Im sure you being the "Know it all" that you act like will find some way to disagree.
I mean he was much worse than a womanizer. He was pathological about it.
As far as other Presidents being incompetent -- some where. However Bush accomplished more of his goals than Kennedy accomplished of his goals. You may not like Bush's goals, but he was more effective than Kennedy. Incidentally, effectiveness is not a sign of how much I like someone. Jackson was highly effective but I despise him.
I'd have to disagree, all Bush Jr did was follow the usual President Doctrines, and protocols that most presidents follow. And more or less pointlessly, finished what his father could have finished In Iraq yrs ago. I seem to remember most Americans complaining that Bush left their country in a big mess after he left.
I would also point out that in the one instance where there was an actual conspiracy to kill the President, just one man did the whole thing from entrance to deed to exit. He did have, however, some help to escape.
Oswald on the other hand, had NO ONE to go to. In fact, he left all of his papers and his ring and a sort of will with his wife Marina and after the assassination, was entirely alone the whole time.
You have to think on a higher level, and as difficult or sinister it may be to believe, America is not the perfect, "White picket fence" land of opportunity, that It makes out it is. It does have a darker side, especially when it comes to looking after its own Interests, and will go to any, extreme lengths to protect these interests.
You have to think on a higher level and realize that this has nothing to do with America being perfect. It has everything to do with facts and evidence.
One of the biggest features of conspiracy theoriests is to ignore the facts and evidence and focus on what they, personally do not know and cannot understand. Which is irrelevant to America being perfect or imperfect.
What we dont know, and cannot understand, is the bigger picture. The government, "the system," is so powerful. And anyone who touches on a truth or gets really deep into secret things, they are not supposed to know alot about, end up disappearing, "getting wiped off the grid." Im not one of these "Nutter Conspiracy theorists," even if I sound like I am. But there are some things, too strange, suspicious that just cant be Ignored.
JFK's security was reduced on that day at JFK's insistence. He made several bad decisions in this regard and ordered the SS to do things that they objected to.
You can't blame them if their assignment rebels agains them!
Hurray! you've actually mentioned something other than the "Patsy," but, it is known, that security is still beefed up, even If a president orders it not to. There are levels of Intelligence that even presidents are kept out of the loop on.
I seem mainly focused on Oswald because there is simply overwhelming evidence tying him to the ONLY reasonable source of the bullets, and no reasonable evidence of anyone else in that regard.
and thinking in that regard is too small and simple a way to think, have to look at the bigger picture. Its known that Nitrate tests indicated Oswald hadnt fired a rifle on Nov 22, analysists didnt even bother to see if the rifle had been fired that day. Also the fact that there were not any exact dates of when finger prints were taken. For all we could know, palm prints could have been taken off Oswald when he was in the morgue, theres no chain of evidence.
Your thinking is way too rigid. Oswald did test positive for firing a gun -- although that does not mean he did. However, he was SEEN firing a gun, so clearly he did that. But a positive or negative test is hardly conclusive either way. It is just support.
As for the exact date of finger prints.. I do not care. It is irrelevant.
See.. this is what I mean .. conspiracy folk do not pay attention to evidence. They care about things that are NOT evidence.
"As for the exact date of finger prints.. I do not care."
Just because you cant explain that, you just dismiss it, like it dosnt matter. I pay attention to evidence, but what you seem to Ignore, is the Fact that, there was alot more going on than just Oswald, and the shooting, there was alot more that led up to that. You dont even seem to acknowledge this, only focusing on what you class as evidence.
Just because you cant explain that, you just dismiss it, like it dosnt matter.
++
No. I dismiss it because it is IRRELEVANT. It does not matter.
you seem to Ignore, is the Fact that, there was alot more going on than just Oswald
++
I do not ignore that. There were aircraft flying that day. And animals being hunted and dying. And a church bell rang. But none of all this other stuff contributes anything of relevance or value to this assassination.
OUCH, you just dont say that at the beginning of your administration as President, do it like Eisenhower "IKE" did, you announce it on your last day in office and don't mention it again. Ike gave a caution to the American middle class, yet many idiots, dismiss it because apparently they know more about the US government than two very independent (relative) presidents of the USA and numerous wistleblowers since then. After Nixon (he was caught lying) US presidents never mentioned secrecy again.
I tell you what happened to this country, the secretive folks won control. JFK and RFK, may very well have been our last hope at true democracy, which is a "transitional" form of government that is not easily maintained. I pity the man who believes that will still feel the warmth of democracy today. I will personally hand him a coat, a few spare dollars and say, .. "Welcome to socialism, enjoy your stay."
the only ppl that consider us conspiracy theorists "nuts" ... are the ppl who are trying to hide the truth.. and that is government, and media that have been under control of our gov. for a very long time.
and the only ppl who still believe oswald did it... clearly havent done any research on the matter. One look at all the evidence and you're mind will be easily swayed.
you've only got to read the books by Jim Garrison and Jim Marrs to Know the truth behind the assasination of jfk, or watch the film that was based on the books by Oliver Stone. The mafias within America at that time, certain structures of the govermant, military and even CIA and secret service all have a part to play in the plot to assassinate jfk.
I read Jim Garrison's book years ago. I also read Jim Marrs book. Marr's book is better than Garrison's, but both are really awful. A far better book is Six Seconds in Dallas. It is a great book but it has been over come by science.
Okay, and like you say if that particular book was "Over come by science," then there you go. Garrison's and Jim Marr's book were meant to be more "educating," than entertaining. It doesn't matter weather those books were or were not, shall we say a "Fun read." The books deeply inspired Stone's film, and that in turn played a major role in a national debate, that led to the passage of the "1992 Assassination Materials Disclosure Act."
I do not think you understand about Six Seconds in Dallas. It was not entertainment. It was rigorous analysis using the best information available at the time. Garrison and Marr's books are really far more infotainment than 6 Seconds.
I do not consider either of them very good and Stone's movie is hogwash from start to end... chiefly because it relies upon Garrison who was a crackpot.
Well thats your opinion and you're entitled to it, but weather you like it or not, Garrison's and Marr's books Inspired a film, that has became one of the most provocative films ever, had massive box office success, earned critical acclaim and awards, and gave a very deep, accurate, Insight Into that major historic event.
Im not going to argue with you over what book is better, just because you dont like my comment, or the fact I mentioned Garrison and Marr's books, and didnt mention your fav "6 Sec..." I never read that book, and one person's opinion of what "they alone" think is better, isnt going to change what I think.
That is fine if you don't argue with me. I am quite happy with that in fact.
The reason that I compared the books is because I used to be heavily into the Kennedy conspiracy theories... and read all the books. It was a kind of hobby for me. So I know a lot of the various theories and stories. I also have read almost all of the books -- more than I can count.
I used to be CERTAIN there was a second shooter. I no longer believe anyone but Oswald shot Kennedy though.
Okay thanks for all that, I can see you are trying to Intimidate, making out you are an "expert" on this, so just to make you happy, I will say, "I believe you." But tell me, do you believe that Oswald ALONE with no help form anyone, no other sources shot Kennedy. I just want to know If you believe, there was absolutely "no co-operation" from other sources, such as Mafia, Government, Military, certain Intelligence services. Is this what you believe??
You are welcome. Not trying to intimidate. Silly idea. Youtube is hardly intimidating.
Yes, I believe Oswald acted alone except for some modest help from his wife.
I believe no one else shot Kennedy. That does not mean there weren't other shooters but they got off at best one round that missed and they were not working with Oswald. Very ineffectual if there were any. I doubt that there were.
JFK really understood that a fully informed public is a happy public. The speech makes it sound like he would turn himself in if he felt he did something wrong.
I doubt the last four US presidents would give that speech and mean it. Has Eisenhower's new world order come to fruition?
Honesty, how can people trust without it? It is the one thing that will keep the US going. The only other thing that may work for a while is fear, but then you just become the thing you fight against.
JFK was the 3rd greatest president behind FDR and Lincoln. The preceeding Presidents were horrific. JFK was the only President to oppose the CIA, who represented an enormous influence over international third world countries, and RFK vengefully prosecuted the MAFIA. Read some books, please - especially regarding the Central Intelligence Agencies role in toppling democratically elected leaders.
Yes, the speech makes it sound like he would turn himself in if he felt he did something wrong. Of course, in truth, he did not do that when he did things that were wrong, but he was a good communicator and made people feel that way.
The New World Order was Wilsons, not Eisenhower's. It has sort of come to pass.
The CIA, Secret Service, NSA And DHS In Particular Have Nothing To Do With Protecting The American People & Instead Everything To Do With Destroying Us & Our Freedom. The CIA in particular should be destroyed! Power tends to corrupt, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
We can all conlcude that he was speaking in general terms that all secret societies had to be dismanteled. You don't need to be a historian to understand that the people who orchestrated his assination made sure to cover up there tracks, to make sure no docuemnt, no person and nothing brought them to justice. The only people with that kind of infuence are the European Bankers.
In this speech JFK never spoke about the existence of secret societies in the US but the secret war (Cold War) being waged by a CLOSED SOCIETY like the USSR which his government was opposing. He requested the cooperation of the Press through self-restraint by not reporting vital information that might jeopardize national security. While it's true that there were those who plotted his murder he was sure not aware of it. Otherwise he would not have come to Dallas in an open top car.
In 5:21 "I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger.....
In 6:10 "This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the Press and to the President, two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer first to the need for far greater PUBLIC INFORMATION and second to the need for far greater OFFICIAL SECRECY."
The second part of his speech about requesting the Press for restraint in giving vital information to the enemy in view of the special type of war the US was engaged at that time (Cold War) was not included in this presentation. That's why this first segment of hi speech was misinterpreted by those who believe his speech was about secret societies. That's the problem with not knowing the WHOLE CONTEXT of the speech.
"No official of my administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censure the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistake, or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know." What were his words that night? Well, they were requests for the press to restraint themselves (for national security) in giving up vital information to the enemy (Communists) about the facts of the Bay of Pigs.
JFK was concerned that the Press might report information about the Bay of Pigs angering their enemies & hurting national security. In asking for press restraint JFK gave assurance that he will not permit news censorship to cover up their mistakes, the tradition of those whom they opposed. He wants a balance between the need for national security & public information. He was not revealing the existence of a secret society within his government.
Seemingly, the first part of the the speech was in response to the "Bay of Pigs" incident, with some minor references to it throughout the speech. No, I am not conceding that this is warning of a Masonic cult, or the "New World Order"; rather, I believe that this speech is largely in response to a covert history which has been writing (and Re-writing) itself since the dawn of written expression -- Mostly by the consent of the very silent majority who refuse to comment on the controversial.
There is no doubt that this is a somewhat vague speech, if thought of in the wrong pretext. So If you do not know the historical context in which this speech was made, I would ask you please not to comment; there is already enough dis-information streaming around.
Though I'm sure that there will be some to comment on it anyhow, which is fine -- as long as the points being made are justifiable.
I listened to the whole speech somewhere in Youtube. JFK began his speech with reference to the "event of recent weeks" - the Bay of Pigs Incident. Listen to him in his entirety. It is a speech that attempts to strike a balance between national security & public information. He appealed to the Press for restraint on behalf of national security but reassured them that press freedom will be respected. "There is little value in opposing tyranny if our tradition do not survive with it."
He talked of covert means and other undemocratic ways implemented by communist regimes which the USA was opposing at that time (Cold War). However he said that there is little value in opposing them if in doing so Americans will just imitate their undemocratic means in suppressing press freedom and if the American tradition of transparency does not survive with it. On the other hand he told them that the US is fighting a Cold War no less dangerous than an open war. The Press should cooperate.
No wonder they shot him. He might as well have stood up against a tidal wave. Or faught a rabid tiger after it snorted an ounce of cocaine. He never stood a chance. We need more politicians like him.
he was assassinated because he signed executive orders to abolish the fraudulent federal reserve, abolish the CIA and withdrew troops from Vietnam and did not sign the $75 billion war bill. lee harvey oswald was the scapegoat. so was sirhan sirhan (scapegoat for the RFK assassination). everybody check out the Northwoods documents (operation northwoods) it's time to take the power back.
What he said is why this election ended the way it did! No debates! The only 2 they had sucked and you cant call the one with the preacher a debate. That was candy ass shit! JFK was right! Im no Kennedy person but he had the vote, but, when the other side sees defeat, they rebell instead of backing up and saying I lost. Oh well...Change is at hand....
The high office of President has been used to forment a plot to destroy the American's freedom,and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of his plight.
( John F. Kennedy's words at Columbia University 10 days before his assasination )
With his idealism,he dared to challenge the might of the cabal and associated agencies of power responsible for exercising imperial and non accountable control of the undeclared American empire.
Obviously he is talking about the CIA. He threatened to do away with the CIA. He fired Allen Dulles, CIA director, which really crippled the CIA. Daddy Bush was in skull & bones and he was a CIA man.
We Texans DO NOT WANT THE Trans Texas Corridor. You can take your NAU and SPP deals and shove it up your rear end or better yet up CFR David Rockefeller and Nathan Rothschild's rear end. As his Father and Grandfather, President Bush is a TRAITOR and in violation of the Logan Act. We Texans want nothing to do with any of Bush's hidden agenda and secret societies. We will fight your NWO efforts because you bring chains to our FREEDOM.
"On June 4, 1963, President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110 that gave the Treasury Department the power "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This order has never been acted upon, but has yet to be repealed."
Ron Paul may not be as charismatic as JFK, look at what he is promoting. Check out his ideas, look what he is doing.
JFK was murdered because he has stopped the Cuba Crisis, he has spoiled the plan for the NWO to wage war. JFK is planing to limited the operation of the CIA, he also knows the danger of the Bankers and have warn us before.
Look at Ron Paul is doing, in fact, I believe Ron Paul have achieve more, he created many "Ron Paul". Look at JFK, he's follower, his son, his brother,both end up assassinated. And then nothing really achieved after that.Whereas Ron Paul inspired thousands of people who are also willing to stand up for their rights and get involved into the politics,they can't assassinate so many people,they are afraid now, very afraid, and also desperate.They intend to label many as terrorist and arrest them.
he's talkn about the same secret societies that killed him...u kno, skull & bones or high degree freemasons,or some other secret society thats probably still in great control of our political system as we speak. its a shame to see people hear this and think he's talkn about communism !
u can't be that blind....or stupid.WAKE UP !
...and no im am not a conspiracy nut...just a freethinker
"This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President--two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy."
"intimidation instead of free choice" IRS. "highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations." Halliburton, Bilderberg, CIA, Federal Reserve/IRS, NASA, Republican/Democrat. "No expenditure is questioned" Millions of war funds unaccounted for. "an error doesnt become a mistake unless you refuse to correct it" Iraq War "without debate without criticism no country can succeed" Dr Paul Censored from debates.
"there is a very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning" 911. "interpret my words here tonight to censor the news to stifle decent or to withhold from the press or public the facts they deserve to know" Fox News?
Over 50 years ago he warned us. Now what do we have? Secret ballots, declarations of war without approval, NDAA allowing the secret arrest, trail, execution or assassination of U.S. citizens. Can you say "Patriot Act"? If you feel that sickness growing in the pit of your stomach, don't be alarmed.... it's normal; waking up can be painful.
DocJerky 3 weeks ago
Edited truth? Maybe, hard to tell when things are taken out of content.
dburd48778 1 month ago
Sorry, Patiot Act = 0:56
HabeasMortis 2 months ago
1:10 = patriot act.
HabeasMortis 2 months ago
It's edited to make it sound like that's the beginning of the speech... Shady.
dburd48778 3 months ago
@dburd48778 the same point gets across, TRUTH
YankeeBra 1 month ago
Comment removed
NederTurk9 3 months ago
Comment removed
NederTurk9 3 months ago
Im sorry but this man was an evil exporter of terror
No different to the presidents of state sponsored terror like bush 1 and 2 andronald reagen
Why admire such an evil man
uptheraful 4 months ago
Two things..Who on earth was JFK referring to? Why was he not naming this grave danger?.Had he not in the past been only to ready to tell us about nefarious deeds by the Soviets, Castro..China..I believe that if we understand who he was addressing and do some study we will come to the conclusion that it can only be one group He was addressing the Newspaper Publishers of America.They knew who he was warning us about. They are the very same people who own America to this day Rothschild is the name
evetsgolb 5 months ago 2
0:56 "And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be ceased upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment." John Fucking Kennedy - what a bad ass.
XIIXCECXIIX 5 months ago
@XIIXCECXIIX Yeah, JFK Predicted the Patriot Act 50 years before it happened.
HabeasMortis 2 months ago
REASON, EMOTION & TRUTH:
The series 'V' is a fictional TV show that explains (revelation of method) what is really going on with the evil UFO creatures (real spirit Lucifer & spirit demon gods) on this earth. The John Carpenter movie 'THEY LIVE' is actually a docudrama that explained this fact about the UFO creatures 25 years ago, but most people care more about the foolish religion of sports than truth, freedom or saving their own lives! I have evidence.
Private Investigator Sinne
U.S.A.
TruthTeller878 7 months ago
@TruthTeller878 please message me with some more info on the evidence your writting about... i feel the same way myself lately
lumendelsol 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EASTER, CHRISTMAS & TRUTH:
People keep defending their betrayers. Many willingly celebrate these wildly wicked weird witchcraft holidays from the weathered old Roman religion of rapists. Are these holidays the beautiful side of evil?...Well, evil, is still evil no matter how it is served to you. The Lord God shall a put curse on all who celebrate these holidays of Hell. You and your children' s children shall suffer plague and death. The Holy Bible explains this fact.
Private Investigator Sinn
TruthTeller878 8 months ago
News doesn't do this anymore... how sad.
1Openminded1 8 months ago
JFK. The last president of America tells the truth. Good men are hard to find
UKzacman 8 months ago 3
This was a US PRESIDENT saying this, he knew something that no other president after him knew and maybe he tried to alert us but was killed too soon. People like me and many others need to stop being dismissed as lunatics and 'conspiracy theorists' because I am fed up of it and I'm tired of being intimidated into a corner by a majority of brain dead patriots who watch Jersey Shore for a pass time and cannot think critically to save their lives.
alessandrozerbone 9 months ago 22
who disliked this? two neo nazis?
Morpheus94080 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I REFER TO THIS SENTENCE: FIRST read .READ the WHOLE Speech !!! He was ASKING The Press to VOLUNTARILY Censure the News ! ww w.blatantworld. c om/ speech/ jfk_the_word_secrecy_is_repugnant. h tml kldirectv2 hace 1 mes
-----------
JFK words ,10 days after, bay of pigs treason by the Press ! informing worldwide in their papers,about the , US Forces number,Strategy of invasion, and even
a guidance misile system !!! War procedures,allows president to control press !!!
are you stupid ???
piacentini 11 months ago
This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President--two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy." ~JFK
THIS IS THE PARAGRAPH "BEFORE" THE PART OF THE SPEECH,,, YOUTUBE , LEFT OUT
kldirectv2 1 year ago
FIRST read .READ the WHOLE Speech !!!
He was ASKING The Press to VOLUNTARILY Censure the News !
ww w.blatantworld. c om/ speech/ jfk_the_word_secrecy_is_repugnant. h tml
kldirectv2 1 year ago
@kldirectv2 : you mad ? JFK is speaking 10 days after Bay of Pigs failure,since Press treason,that informed
worlwide ,all US Forces,Dates of invasion,Strategies,and a secret misile guidance system,that had to be changed. Press media owners are "guilty as charged" ,and JFK could execute them or hang them for high treason, he did not, and ended in Dallas with 6 bullets inside and 1 poisoned dart in neck, financed by this guys,who betrayed him,and us citizens . FED was in danger cos JFK ?
piacentini 11 months ago
WikiLeaks should use this insightful speech in its defense. There should be NO secrecy in everyday operations of government.
MuleKist 1 year ago 5
Why did Bush kill JFK?
GHW Bush was my commanding officer during
the secret invasion of Cuba.
JFK stopped the invasion of Cuba.
Bush vowed vengeance against JFK
for helping Che & Fidel defeat the CIA.
Jail Bush for the murder of JFK.
See the movie: paul8kangas
paul8kangas 1 year ago
@paul8kangas Movies don't prove anything...
GraphiteGum 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But the Oil coporations life depends on covering this up,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
glennjgd 1 year ago
he had so much courage that he made enemies of almost all powerful men as to make it impossible to determine which of them took him out.
DCUPtoejuice 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
FJFK (fuck jfk)
crusher1427 1 year ago
This speech PROVES the existence and the guilt of the Illuminati. It PROVES everything that's going wrong UNTIL TODAY. Governments don't exist anymore it's all an illusion. Wake the fuck up...
Jayn0o 1 year ago 27
@Jayn0o Tell 'em, Jay!
kroswit 1 year ago
@Jayn0o Shut the fuck up you stupid kid reaming in your own world.. you have no idea how Governments work so shut the fuck up and go to Law school bfore you start playing some fucking computer games.... GROW UP..
GraphiteGum 1 year ago
@GraphiteGum Look at what you just wrote. Full of assumptions and insults and you don't even know me. Shows what kind of person you are also shows how evolved you are. I sincerely hope your 13/19 if you are past that you need help...
Jayn0o 10 months ago
@Jayn0o so ? it proves it .... stating the obvious is useless .
doing something about it is (kill them all ? ).... idiotic ( good luck ) .
why not change your mind ... broaden your horizons ... look on ways to change the system rather then stating the way it works ..
noamshio 10 months ago
@Jayn0o
it need no proving , it exists in many records ...
only the proceedings remain hidden in plain site . stating the obvious will lead nowhere .
just look at ways to change the situation , by changing the system .
its not impossible , just really difficult .
what else can u do ? kill them all ?
others will take their place like vultures .
noamshio 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Jayn0o
it need no proving , it exists in many records ...
only the proceedings remain hidden in plain site . stating the obvious will lead nowhere .
just look at ways to change the situation , by changing the system .
its not impossible , just really difficult .
what else can u do ? kill them all ?
others will take their place like vultures .
noamshio 10 months ago
@Jayn0o Too bad nobody listens... i mean he's laying it out for everyone to understand but they don't.
1Openminded1 8 months ago
JFK was what this world needed. he went against what all other presidents have/are doing. being puppets for the elite. WHY ELSE WOULD THIS MAN BE ASSASSINATED?!!?!?!! THE ELITE KNEW THE AWAKENING WAS COMING! THEY HAD TO GET THIS MAN OUT OF OFFICE SO THEY MURDERED HIM! PLEASE PEOPLE WAKE UP BEFORE ITS TOO LATE
sheedaddy08 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the last real president of the USA
chhuong1 1 year ago
Do you think that it is possible for a Socialist Workers Party to rise to power electorally in the 2012 elections, since Republicans and Democrats are so evil? or do americans have to wait for 2016 elections for a socialist party to govern the USA? Or do we have to overthrow the US government in order for USA to become socialist?
maxistsocialist 1 year ago
@maxistsocialist you wont get a chance....read your bible people fuck! revelations if your lazy but the whole thing tells you everything you need to know. The daughter of chaldea the mystery babylon harlot sits in new york the statue of liberty is nimrods wife! they do take us. But in the end they get theres but not without the 7 yrs of tribulations...stay strong people
adznz11 1 year ago
Wholly shit, President Kennedy talked about this years ago!!!!!
Airsoftcleaner 1 year ago
@Airsoftcleaner duuuuh! many have. mostly the fuckin bible! only now america is listning! it took a hero pres do die and peeps only getting it now...it makes no difference now there plans are solid...only those who resist will be accepted by or creators when the time comes. no to the chip!
adznz11 1 year ago
@adznz11 Well it was just shocking was all but I guess with this secret gang shit thats going on today I shouldn't be too shocked.(And yes I said Gangs because that's what they are)
Airsoftcleaner 1 year ago
@Airsoftcleaner It's not a gang. It's a secret society WAY more organized than a gang... A society within a society that controls everything. YES everything.
Jayn0o 1 year ago 2
I do believe JFK was the president during the Cuban Missile Crisis. The CMC was the main showdown between the world powers in the cold war. The USSR left Cuba with the missiles.
To compare JFK to Bush is a horrible mistake. JFK was killed because he didn't support going to war. The only people who benefits in a war are the medias and the weapon industry.
Bush is weak and a puppet. Just listen to the way they speak.
nyctim2009 2 years ago 3
@nyctim2009 you forgot the world banking cartel....thats who profits the most...the elite
adznz11 1 year ago 2
He was assassinated because he could have helped the society, but of course the gouverment and the sercret corporations dident like that. Freaking freaks...
Hodak55 2 years ago 2
@Hodak55 he was killed for what he knew about them....how do you think you get to be a priesident?????? diff was he had a concience...he said no! and he paid
adznz11 1 year ago
Jackie Kennedy, Mrs.Connolly and the SS Men are all fortunate that they were not struck. Hitting them by accident would have been quite possible... as was the case with John Connolly -- who was more directly in the line of fire (but so was a SS Agent).
DURound 2 years ago
One man could never be Lucky enough to conduct an assassination of a president, especially American Pres, even in that time. There were higher powers involved, Infact it is heck of alot bigger than just one man killing JFK. Higher power structures in the US, believe that nations and societies exist to make war. And that without it, the "Nation-state" in a modern sense would crumble.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
You believe one man could not conduct an assassination of a president. You need to tell that to the people who were shot when there was an attempt on Reagan. Had Hinkley been a better shot, Reagan would be dead. One man. Insane. Alone.
To imagine one man cannot do such things is just imaginary claptrap contradicted by 140 years of evidence.
DURound 2 years ago
More like 4 decades of facts that contradict the lone gunman theory. I am consistently baffled by people who can watch know goverment conspiracies like Project popeye, Watergate, Iran/contra, Castro assasination attempts that were first denied but later admitted by the CIA, etc, and say, without reservation that our government would not lie to us. Do we need to sit you down in front of the CIA director and have him write it out for you.- cause they won't. At any point do think outside the box.
carsearch2001 2 years ago
It has nothing to do with whether the government WOULD or COULD do something. It has everything to do with evidence.
DURound 2 years ago
I also think that there was a very high probability that Oswald would have failed to kill Kennedy. His first shot missed. His second shot was bad but not fatal by any means. His third fatal shot, nearly was a miss. But he probably had time to get one more shot off if it had missed -- but by then the car would really have been moving fast and farther away.
DURound 2 years ago
I think Oswald may have been clinically depressed. I think after a period of multiple job losses, dislocation and unemployment, he started seeking fame as a man who killed other famous people.
I think, had he gotten away with killing Kennedy, he would have killed someone else -- LBJ, Governor Wallace, or McNamara.
DURound 2 years ago
Only two things ever made me think that there could have been two shooters.
1. "Back and to the left"
2. Trajectory studies that may have involved another building.
I believe that back and to the left is still partly mysterious but 80% explanable with shots from the rear and I believe trajectory studies pretty much cinch the source being Oswald's nest.
DURound 2 years ago
Yes but what Im trying to ask you is, you think it was just as simple as "One man," simply planning the day/time, going out and doing the shooting?? Nothing about any other source's Involvement? or about him being a "Patsy." Nothing about the presidents security being cut down?? Nothing about any Government cover ups?? You just think he went out and made some perfect shot/kills on the President, Its as simple as that to you??
RaikenXion 2 years ago
Yes, I think it was as simple as one man with a sort of combination of about 6 months and 1 week of planning. No other sources involved, just this lying communist loser. Its that simple. Oswald was too much of a loser and too much of a loner to be "with" someone. I think he did love his wife though.
I do not think his shots were perfect. They were probably not as good as he was actually capable of doing, but they were OK.
DURound 2 years ago
His shots were perfect If he managed to get a head shot kill on the President. I do think you are way too out there, to just think "One man," was capable of murdering the president, alone. I therefore cannot agree with your opinion, plus you havnt even explained JFK security, or anything I mentioned. You just seem mainly focused on Oswald.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
I think his head shot was an "excellent" shot but it was very close to being a "miss". The truth is, there was some luck involved.
Throughout history...whenever any other President was murdered... it was ALWAYS just one man alone. And in the most recent case where he failed... it was one man, alone.
It is not ridiculous that one man acting alone could do this. It is standard operating procedure.
DURound 2 years ago
"Standard Operating Procedure," Im sure I've heard that from a film. Oswald committed the shooting is fair enough, but just like terrorists attacked the WTC, and Pentagon, there were higher levels of power, that allowed these perpetrators to do what they did. It is known that JFK, wanted to deconstruct, even destroy the CIA. And he was against war in South-East Asia. Alot of his views, were criticized by the establishment,
RaikenXion 2 years ago
The higher levels of power for the terrorists on 9/11 was Khalid Sheik Mohammed. For Oswald, there was no higher level of power. He operated as the lone loser he was.
Kennedy not only did NOT want to deconstruct the CIA, he grew it during his administration -- because he used them to enhance his new war in South East Asia.
This is true even if you do not believe it.
DURound 2 years ago
CIA grew after, because JFK wanted to deconstruct it. JFK was a very modern President, who was more in touch with the youth of that era, than any other president before. Alot of his Ideals, polices, were very ambitious, maybe he was even naive, he was changing the country, and alot of "figures," disagreed with his methods of thinking. They classed him as a "radicalist," scared that if he carried on, he could change America for good, and that where would those changes lead in the future.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
CIA grew after
+++
No-- DURING Kennedys administration. He used the CIA A LOT!!!
because JFK wanted\ to deconstruct it.\
+++
Nonsense. This is a myth.
he was changing the country,
+++
He changed almost nothing He was a very ineffective President.
DURound 2 years ago
We can go on arguing these points forever, all I'll say is that you are wrong, It went like this you will always say opposite. And to tell you truth Im getting tired of saying the same things, how can you say JFK more or less changed nothing?? I almost get the feeling you never liked the man. You are at one end of a spectrum, certain things you class as myth, nonsense, just because you cant fully "explain" them.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
We can go on arguing these points forever,
==
The difference is.. you are working off of imaginary things.
how can you say JFK more or less changed nothing??
==
He got NOTHING of great importance done in his administration. NOTHING. (Unless you count the Peace Corps -- which I do not).
DURound 2 years ago
First of all JFK was not in Presidency that long, but he did encourage progress of the Space Race. His carefull negotiations with Khrushchev, brought the "Cuban Missile Crisis" to a safe end. He did alot to help end Racial Discrimination, he proposed a Tax Reform, Income Tax cuts. The Economy actually turned around and prospered during Kennedy's administration. He supported Civil Rights and Racial Integration at a time when there was strong Racial Segregation in America.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
1000 days is a long time. James K Polk was president only 4 years and yet he accomplished 100% of his goals.
Kennedy's "careful" negotiations nearly got us in a shooting war with the Russians. It has been hyped as Kennedy's greatest moment. In reality it was a disaster and we are lucky the Russians had cooler heads.
He ACCOMPLISHED very little. You want to brag on what he "proposed" or "supported". I am talking about EFFECTIVENESS.
DURound 2 years ago
Im not bragging on anything, Just giving you facts on the Important things he did, and helped the country achieve. All the things I mentioned, were very affective, If you cant see that, then I cant do anything else about it.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
But you didn't give me any facts on important things he did. You discussed things he liked and described what was nearly his greatest failure.
He accomplished nothing of value. This is a fact even if you wish it were otherwise.
DURound 2 years ago
Now your are just being Extra, and are giving me the feeling you never really liked the man, this true??
Do you admire JFK? Or respect anything he did, I know I do and wasnt even around in his time.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
I do not really know what it means to be "extra".
I cried when Kennedy was shot.
But I was a kid. I did not realize he was a man-whore, or that he was incompetent in his job.
DURound 2 years ago
You mean, he was a Womanizer, and I'd say he did his Job better in the short time he was in office, than what G W Bush did in his whole time in Presidencey. And I'd expect you to agree with that, but Im sure you being the "Know it all" that you act like will find some way to disagree.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
I mean he was much worse than a womanizer. He was pathological about it.
As far as other Presidents being incompetent -- some where. However Bush accomplished more of his goals than Kennedy accomplished of his goals. You may not like Bush's goals, but he was more effective than Kennedy. Incidentally, effectiveness is not a sign of how much I like someone. Jackson was highly effective but I despise him.
DURound 2 years ago
I'd have to disagree, all Bush Jr did was follow the usual President Doctrines, and protocols that most presidents follow. And more or less pointlessly, finished what his father could have finished In Iraq yrs ago. I seem to remember most Americans complaining that Bush left their country in a big mess after he left.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
Bush accomplished most of his goals. You may disagree... but then, you would disagree with history.
DURound 2 years ago
Yeah, the same way You would disagree with History about JFK.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
History records that JFK was ineffective and that he was, as a result, concerned he would not win a second term.
DURound 2 years ago
History says alot of things about JFK, good and bad, Its up to people which things we choose to believe and not believe.
RaikenXion 2 years ago 2
he was assassinated because he was capable of great thing's reason why he wasnt given a chance to settle in.
Ocyrix 2 years ago
I would also point out that in the one instance where there was an actual conspiracy to kill the President, just one man did the whole thing from entrance to deed to exit. He did have, however, some help to escape.
Oswald on the other hand, had NO ONE to go to. In fact, he left all of his papers and his ring and a sort of will with his wife Marina and after the assassination, was entirely alone the whole time.
No conspirators were with him before or after.
DURound 2 years ago
You have to think on a higher level, and as difficult or sinister it may be to believe, America is not the perfect, "White picket fence" land of opportunity, that It makes out it is. It does have a darker side, especially when it comes to looking after its own Interests, and will go to any, extreme lengths to protect these interests.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
You have to think on a higher level and realize that this has nothing to do with America being perfect. It has everything to do with facts and evidence.
One of the biggest features of conspiracy theoriests is to ignore the facts and evidence and focus on what they, personally do not know and cannot understand. Which is irrelevant to America being perfect or imperfect.
DURound 2 years ago
What we dont know, and cannot understand, is the bigger picture. The government, "the system," is so powerful. And anyone who touches on a truth or gets really deep into secret things, they are not supposed to know alot about, end up disappearing, "getting wiped off the grid." Im not one of these "Nutter Conspiracy theorists," even if I sound like I am. But there are some things, too strange, suspicious that just cant be Ignored.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
What we dont know, and cannot understand, is the bigger picture.
+++
You speak ONLY for yourself. I am not quite as illiterate or ignorant of things as you are.
Im not one of these "Nutter Conspiracy theorists,"
++
Yes you are! How silly to deny it!
DURound 2 years ago
JFK's security was reduced on that day at JFK's insistence. He made several bad decisions in this regard and ordered the SS to do things that they objected to.
You can't blame them if their assignment rebels agains them!
DURound 2 years ago
Hurray! you've actually mentioned something other than the "Patsy," but, it is known, that security is still beefed up, even If a president orders it not to. There are levels of Intelligence that even presidents are kept out of the loop on.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
Oswald was no Patsy. He was, however, a liar. The security on this motorcade was not beefed up. Because Kennedy prevented it.
This is a fact even if you do not believe it.
DURound 2 years ago
I seem mainly focused on Oswald because there is simply overwhelming evidence tying him to the ONLY reasonable source of the bullets, and no reasonable evidence of anyone else in that regard.
DURound 2 years ago
and thinking in that regard is too small and simple a way to think, have to look at the bigger picture. Its known that Nitrate tests indicated Oswald hadnt fired a rifle on Nov 22, analysists didnt even bother to see if the rifle had been fired that day. Also the fact that there were not any exact dates of when finger prints were taken. For all we could know, palm prints could have been taken off Oswald when he was in the morgue, theres no chain of evidence.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
Your thinking is way too rigid. Oswald did test positive for firing a gun -- although that does not mean he did. However, he was SEEN firing a gun, so clearly he did that. But a positive or negative test is hardly conclusive either way. It is just support.
As for the exact date of finger prints.. I do not care. It is irrelevant.
See.. this is what I mean .. conspiracy folk do not pay attention to evidence. They care about things that are NOT evidence.
DURound 2 years ago
"As for the exact date of finger prints.. I do not care."
Just because you cant explain that, you just dismiss it, like it dosnt matter. I pay attention to evidence, but what you seem to Ignore, is the Fact that, there was alot more going on than just Oswald, and the shooting, there was alot more that led up to that. You dont even seem to acknowledge this, only focusing on what you class as evidence.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
Just because you cant explain that, you just dismiss it, like it dosnt matter.
++
No. I dismiss it because it is IRRELEVANT. It does not matter.
you seem to Ignore, is the Fact that, there was alot more going on than just Oswald
++
I do not ignore that. There were aircraft flying that day. And animals being hunted and dying. And a church bell rang. But none of all this other stuff contributes anything of relevance or value to this assassination.
DURound 2 years ago
You dont even seem to acknowledge this, only focusing on what you class as evidence.
++
I do not believe that fantasies and lack of evidence should be given the weight of evidence.
And really.. why should anyone believe rantings, imaginings, and things that are NOT evidence over what is actually evidence?
DURound 2 years ago
OUCH, you just dont say that at the beginning of your administration as President, do it like Eisenhower "IKE" did, you announce it on your last day in office and don't mention it again. Ike gave a caution to the American middle class, yet many idiots, dismiss it because apparently they know more about the US government than two very independent (relative) presidents of the USA and numerous wistleblowers since then. After Nixon (he was caught lying) US presidents never mentioned secrecy again.
carsearch2001 2 years ago
Bush and Reagan both mentioned secrecy.
DURound 2 years ago
RIP Ted Kennedy, the last of a great legacy.
Tobrwa 2 years ago
I tell you what happened to this country, the secretive folks won control. JFK and RFK, may very well have been our last hope at true democracy, which is a "transitional" form of government that is not easily maintained. I pity the man who believes that will still feel the warmth of democracy today. I will personally hand him a coat, a few spare dollars and say, .. "Welcome to socialism, enjoy your stay."
Brazzle 2 years ago
This speech is stunningly relevant today even after 40 years!
Where oh where are politicians like this these days? What has happened to the country?
evilfreethinker 2 years ago 2
the only ppl that consider us conspiracy theorists "nuts" ... are the ppl who are trying to hide the truth.. and that is government, and media that have been under control of our gov. for a very long time.
and the only ppl who still believe oswald did it... clearly havent done any research on the matter. One look at all the evidence and you're mind will be easily swayed.
pt109girl 2 years ago
truly prophetic
greasemonger 2 years ago 16
you've only got to read the books by Jim Garrison and Jim Marrs to Know the truth behind the assasination of jfk, or watch the film that was based on the books by Oliver Stone. The mafias within America at that time, certain structures of the govermant, military and even CIA and secret service all have a part to play in the plot to assassinate jfk.
RaikenXion 2 years ago 2
I read Jim Garrison's book years ago. I also read Jim Marrs book. Marr's book is better than Garrison's, but both are really awful. A far better book is Six Seconds in Dallas. It is a great book but it has been over come by science.
DURound 2 years ago
Okay, and like you say if that particular book was "Over come by science," then there you go. Garrison's and Jim Marr's book were meant to be more "educating," than entertaining. It doesn't matter weather those books were or were not, shall we say a "Fun read." The books deeply inspired Stone's film, and that in turn played a major role in a national debate, that led to the passage of the "1992 Assassination Materials Disclosure Act."
RaikenXion 2 years ago
I do not think you understand about Six Seconds in Dallas. It was not entertainment. It was rigorous analysis using the best information available at the time. Garrison and Marr's books are really far more infotainment than 6 Seconds.
I do not consider either of them very good and Stone's movie is hogwash from start to end... chiefly because it relies upon Garrison who was a crackpot.
DURound 2 years ago
Well thats your opinion and you're entitled to it, but weather you like it or not, Garrison's and Marr's books Inspired a film, that has became one of the most provocative films ever, had massive box office success, earned critical acclaim and awards, and gave a very deep, accurate, Insight Into that major historic event.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
Yes, Garrison's and Marr's books inspired a film. They are infotainment. You would never get that from Six Seconds in Dallas.
The film was not a very deep or very accurate insight into a major historical event because it was based upon flawed information.
It was a movie. Entertainment. "artistic license".
DURound 2 years ago
Im not going to argue with you over what book is better, just because you dont like my comment, or the fact I mentioned Garrison and Marr's books, and didnt mention your fav "6 Sec..." I never read that book, and one person's opinion of what "they alone" think is better, isnt going to change what I think.
RaikenXion 2 years ago
That is fine if you don't argue with me. I am quite happy with that in fact.
The reason that I compared the books is because I used to be heavily into the Kennedy conspiracy theories... and read all the books. It was a kind of hobby for me. So I know a lot of the various theories and stories. I also have read almost all of the books -- more than I can count.
I used to be CERTAIN there was a second shooter. I no longer believe anyone but Oswald shot Kennedy though.
DURound 2 years ago
Okay thanks for all that, I can see you are trying to Intimidate, making out you are an "expert" on this, so just to make you happy, I will say, "I believe you." But tell me, do you believe that Oswald ALONE with no help form anyone, no other sources shot Kennedy. I just want to know If you believe, there was absolutely "no co-operation" from other sources, such as Mafia, Government, Military, certain Intelligence services. Is this what you believe??
RaikenXion 2 years ago
You are welcome. Not trying to intimidate. Silly idea. Youtube is hardly intimidating.
Yes, I believe Oswald acted alone except for some modest help from his wife.
I believe no one else shot Kennedy. That does not mean there weren't other shooters but they got off at best one round that missed and they were not working with Oswald. Very ineffectual if there were any. I doubt that there were.
DURound 2 years ago
JFK really understood that a fully informed public is a happy public. The speech makes it sound like he would turn himself in if he felt he did something wrong.
I doubt the last four US presidents would give that speech and mean it. Has Eisenhower's new world order come to fruition?
Honesty, how can people trust without it? It is the one thing that will keep the US going. The only other thing that may work for a while is fear, but then you just become the thing you fight against.
Schalos 2 years ago
The speech makes it sound like he would turn himself in if he felt he did something wrong.
===
Yep. That is how it sounds.
But did Kennedy ever turn himself in? No. And he was no angel.
And if you read the real speech you will see he is telling the press to be QUIET about state secrets during time of (Cold) war.
He even threatens the press very subtly.
DURound 2 years ago
JFK was the 3rd greatest president behind FDR and Lincoln. The preceeding Presidents were horrific. JFK was the only President to oppose the CIA, who represented an enormous influence over international third world countries, and RFK vengefully prosecuted the MAFIA. Read some books, please - especially regarding the Central Intelligence Agencies role in toppling democratically elected leaders.
SuperOmnicron 2 years ago
Yes, the speech makes it sound like he would turn himself in if he felt he did something wrong. Of course, in truth, he did not do that when he did things that were wrong, but he was a good communicator and made people feel that way.
The New World Order was Wilsons, not Eisenhower's. It has sort of come to pass.
DURound 2 years ago
f*ck freemasons
kurgens 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
The CIA, Secret Service, NSA And DHS In Particular Have Nothing To Do With Protecting The American People & Instead Everything To Do With Destroying Us & Our Freedom. The CIA in particular should be destroyed! Power tends to corrupt, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Jjjs14 2 years ago
We can all conlcude that he was speaking in general terms that all secret societies had to be dismanteled. You don't need to be a historian to understand that the people who orchestrated his assination made sure to cover up there tracks, to make sure no docuemnt, no person and nothing brought them to justice. The only people with that kind of infuence are the European Bankers.
sp33dygsr 2 years ago
In this speech JFK never spoke about the existence of secret societies in the US but the secret war (Cold War) being waged by a CLOSED SOCIETY like the USSR which his government was opposing. He requested the cooperation of the Press through self-restraint by not reporting vital information that might jeopardize national security. While it's true that there were those who plotted his murder he was sure not aware of it. Otherwise he would not have come to Dallas in an open top car.
csdr0 2 years ago
Are you for real?
mooners40 2 years ago
Ya know what leapingG I'll be your future president and be like JFK. Sounds Cool?
Peacpromoter 2 years ago
In 5:21 "I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger.....
In 6:10 "This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the Press and to the President, two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer first to the need for far greater PUBLIC INFORMATION and second to the need for far greater OFFICIAL SECRECY."
csdr0 3 years ago
The second part of his speech about requesting the Press for restraint in giving vital information to the enemy in view of the special type of war the US was engaged at that time (Cold War) was not included in this presentation. That's why this first segment of hi speech was misinterpreted by those who believe his speech was about secret societies. That's the problem with not knowing the WHOLE CONTEXT of the speech.
csdr0 3 years ago
"No official of my administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censure the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistake, or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know." What were his words that night? Well, they were requests for the press to restraint themselves (for national security) in giving up vital information to the enemy (Communists) about the facts of the Bay of Pigs.
csdr0 3 years ago
JFK was concerned that the Press might report information about the Bay of Pigs angering their enemies & hurting national security. In asking for press restraint JFK gave assurance that he will not permit news censorship to cover up their mistakes, the tradition of those whom they opposed. He wants a balance between the need for national security & public information. He was not revealing the existence of a secret society within his government.
csdr0 3 years ago
Seemingly, the first part of the the speech was in response to the "Bay of Pigs" incident, with some minor references to it throughout the speech. No, I am not conceding that this is warning of a Masonic cult, or the "New World Order"; rather, I believe that this speech is largely in response to a covert history which has been writing (and Re-writing) itself since the dawn of written expression -- Mostly by the consent of the very silent majority who refuse to comment on the controversial.
NarnTheSeaboo 3 years ago
There is no doubt that this is a somewhat vague speech, if thought of in the wrong pretext. So If you do not know the historical context in which this speech was made, I would ask you please not to comment; there is already enough dis-information streaming around.
Though I'm sure that there will be some to comment on it anyhow, which is fine -- as long as the points being made are justifiable.
--Then again, what can I do about it?
NarnTheSeaboo 3 years ago
I listened to the whole speech somewhere in Youtube. JFK began his speech with reference to the "event of recent weeks" - the Bay of Pigs Incident. Listen to him in his entirety. It is a speech that attempts to strike a balance between national security & public information. He appealed to the Press for restraint on behalf of national security but reassured them that press freedom will be respected. "There is little value in opposing tyranny if our tradition do not survive with it."
csdr0 3 years ago
He talked of covert means and other undemocratic ways implemented by communist regimes which the USA was opposing at that time (Cold War). However he said that there is little value in opposing them if in doing so Americans will just imitate their undemocratic means in suppressing press freedom and if the American tradition of transparency does not survive with it. On the other hand he told them that the US is fighting a Cold War no less dangerous than an open war. The Press should cooperate.
csdr0 3 years ago
No wonder they shot him. He might as well have stood up against a tidal wave. Or faught a rabid tiger after it snorted an ounce of cocaine. He never stood a chance. We need more politicians like him.
...werd!
leapingG 3 years ago 10
he was assassinated because he signed executive orders to abolish the fraudulent federal reserve, abolish the CIA and withdrew troops from Vietnam and did not sign the $75 billion war bill. lee harvey oswald was the scapegoat. so was sirhan sirhan (scapegoat for the RFK assassination). everybody check out the Northwoods documents (operation northwoods) it's time to take the power back.
RootsmanStylee 3 years ago 2
What he said is why this election ended the way it did! No debates! The only 2 they had sucked and you cant call the one with the preacher a debate. That was candy ass shit! JFK was right! Im no Kennedy person but he had the vote, but, when the other side sees defeat, they rebell instead of backing up and saying I lost. Oh well...Change is at hand....
boy6974 3 years ago
The high office of President has been used to forment a plot to destroy the American's freedom,and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of his plight.
( John F. Kennedy's words at Columbia University 10 days before his assasination )
With his idealism,he dared to challenge the might of the cabal and associated agencies of power responsible for exercising imperial and non accountable control of the undeclared American empire.
RIP, JFK.
CommanderUTube 3 years ago
Obviously he is talking about the CIA. He threatened to do away with the CIA. He fired Allen Dulles, CIA director, which really crippled the CIA. Daddy Bush was in skull & bones and he was a CIA man.
clautrice07 3 years ago
haha. when are we going to admit to ourselves that that "agency" is nothing more than a family business.
bweazel 3 years ago
Wow. I have my issues with JFK. But, this seems to be one of the best things a President can say.
godlyfighter 3 years ago
cause he was a true leader. a fair man. we need someone like this back in office.
bweazel 3 years ago
ditto.
KRosen333 3 years ago
If this was in 61, why did they kill him two years later?
KissMeImPunk 3 years ago
What exactly is your point?
April4th1984 3 years ago
If this was in 61, wouldn't he just be killed soon after to make sure it wouldn't spread?
KissMeImPunk 3 years ago
They sent him to kindom come early, though.
CommanderUTube 3 years ago
God Bless JFK!
Too many, today, subscribe to what he rejected in days gone by.
SureHowDoYouKnow 3 years ago
The American citizens should be arming themselves at this time. Don't delay.
April4th1984 3 years ago
We Texans DO NOT WANT THE Trans Texas Corridor. You can take your NAU and SPP deals and shove it up your rear end or better yet up CFR David Rockefeller and Nathan Rothschild's rear end. As his Father and Grandfather, President Bush is a TRAITOR and in violation of the Logan Act. We Texans want nothing to do with any of Bush's hidden agenda and secret societies. We will fight your NWO efforts because you bring chains to our FREEDOM.
google:
Prescott Bush Nazi's banker during WWII
pork4allah 3 years ago 2
Wow. Now that's leadership.
mrgerbeck 3 years ago 2
American Patriot's Weapons of Choice.
"On June 4, 1963, President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110 that gave the Treasury Department the power "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This order has never been acted upon, but has yet to be repealed."
The Bill of Rights
The Constitution of the
United States of America
We the People of the United States
pork4allah 3 years ago 3
To respect JKF, we need to support Ron Paul who also do not wants the secretive of the government.
He want Government get out of your life!
Be a delegates for him if you are supporting Ron Paul.
If you still skeptical about him, research on his message, before you judge. Thanks
1st April Money Bomb For Ron Paul!
LeeKwangEng 3 years ago
please dont tie ron paul with JFK, thats ridiculous.
notoriousmaze619 3 years ago
Ron Paul may not be as charismatic as JFK, look at what he is promoting. Check out his ideas, look what he is doing.
JFK was murdered because he has stopped the Cuba Crisis, he has spoiled the plan for the NWO to wage war. JFK is planing to limited the operation of the CIA, he also knows the danger of the Bankers and have warn us before.
LeeKwangEng 3 years ago
Look at Ron Paul is doing, in fact, I believe Ron Paul have achieve more, he created many "Ron Paul". Look at JFK, he's follower, his son, his brother,both end up assassinated. And then nothing really achieved after that.Whereas Ron Paul inspired thousands of people who are also willing to stand up for their rights and get involved into the politics,they can't assassinate so many people,they are afraid now, very afraid, and also desperate.They intend to label many as terrorist and arrest them.
LeeKwangEng 3 years ago
i love jfk and rfk
andrewmannsvideos 3 years ago
he's talkn about the same secret societies that killed him...u kno, skull & bones or high degree freemasons,or some other secret society thats probably still in great control of our political system as we speak. its a shame to see people hear this and think he's talkn about communism !
u can't be that blind....or stupid.WAKE UP !
...and no im am not a conspiracy nut...just a freethinker
phellie 3 years ago
look up the entire speech. dont JUMP to conclusions.
he was speaking to the press about the need for wartime like security needs during the cold war
the orginazaton he talks about is communism
the speech is very relevent today to what we need to deal with in regards to the medias job to keep the admin honest
he asked the press to hold his admin responsible not let this call for secrecy be used to cover up the truth about admins wrongs
2:42- 4:34 wtf is he talkin about think 4urself
XxmattitudexX 3 years ago
Its so eerie to hear that with everything going on...
jrod2211 3 years ago
who ever commented and called him jack kennedy is a fuckin moron, its john fitzgerald kennedy you fuck up
hamijeff 3 years ago
His nickname was Jack, you idiot.
Khorne19 3 years ago
It's cut out, but before this, Kennedy says:
"This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President--two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy."
It's in just "almost" a contradictory.
Final911Truth 4 years ago
It sounds to me as though it is entirely possible that the entity that he was referring to may have been Communism and its proponents.
TreeOfManna 4 years ago
this is just more conspiracy crap. have you people ever read the entire speech. he wasn't talking about what you nuts think he was..read his speech.
arther1045 4 years ago
that was what he was referring to. I hate how the conspiracy nuts are eating this beautiful speech up, destroying the memory of a great man.
WhereIsTheHope 3 years ago
If only we had a leader like JFK today. Oh wait... we do. His name is Ron Paul.
April4th1984 4 years ago
Ron Paul is a decent enough guy, but he's NOT jack Kennedy.
WhereIsTheHope 3 years ago
watch the film jfk
thesunofjuda 4 years ago
he did see 47 years into the future.
he knew there plans
if you can understand wat he saying about security, secrets
he predicts all the political agenda's now
thesunofjuda 4 years ago
...no wonder this dude was shot.
AMERICA! FARK YHEA!!
chenzenfromqingwu 4 years ago
FECK! This guy could see 47 years into the future.
CallMeAnAmbulance 4 years ago
You Ambulance!
r7n7 4 years ago
"intimidation instead of free choice" IRS. "highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations." Halliburton, Bilderberg, CIA, Federal Reserve/IRS, NASA, Republican/Democrat. "No expenditure is questioned" Millions of war funds unaccounted for. "an error doesnt become a mistake unless you refuse to correct it" Iraq War "without debate without criticism no country can succeed" Dr Paul Censored from debates.
MMadmike 4 years ago 2
"there is a very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning" 911. "interpret my words here tonight to censor the news to stifle decent or to withhold from the press or public the facts they deserve to know" Fox News?
MMadmike 4 years ago