Added: 2 years ago
From: mr1001nights
Views: 4,717
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (435)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • everything must change..hahaHa

  • propaganda film. Noam Chomsky cares tho.....he supports Pol Pot, not those who parished under his regime(watch the Killing Fields)

  • @TreeSmoke1999

    Shut the fuck up your lying cunt. Chomsky has never suppoted pol pot.

  • @brownie1982ad ?? Great another e-thug talking shit via computer. Read "After the Cataclysm" by Noam Chomsky, Chomsky says the level of horror which took place in Cambodia is greatly exaggerated.........this is a fact!! The irony is, Chomsky is supposed to be for the serf/slave/proletariat ect. if you read extensively into the history of Pol Pot's killing fields you'll not he enslaved everybody(the irony being serfs and poor people)....but he had Chomsky to "downplay" the atrocities :)

  • @brownie1982ad to conclude, did Chomsky "support" Pol Pot not exactly however when your an intellectual giant and you have millions who suck your cock and follow every word you say, you should have the foresight to see what was occuring in the initial stages when forced agriculture laws were brought into play.

    I'll never understand Chomsky dick riders, if someone pointed out fallacies about my hero's(thinkers wise) I would listen and not be an apologist. Your not on his pay roll!!!!

  • @TreeSmoke1999 you are a mad cunt! What fallacies are you talking about mental case?

  • @brownie1982ad .....for instance I was/am a big Christopher Hitchens fan as I am an atheist. However I fully reject his neo-con views and pro war stance. So I like some of what he represents when he actually fights the oppressive abusers of the Catholic church for example. With Chomsky supporters its....Noam can do no wrong" even if he flew planes into towers they'd find an excuse its hilarious. Drop to your knees and open your mouth.

    Tea Party arn't "don't tread on me" their neo-cons lol

  • @TreeSmoke1999

    Chomsky supported Pol Pot?

    Id like evidence of that please. I've read Manufcturing Consent, and he simply says that the american bombings were responsible for more deaths than Pol Pot, and that eventually the US supported him.

  • this video has proven to be truly prophetic

  • where is the Chomsky part from???

  • We enjoy great freedoms and we must defend them not attack them. The only reason why our prosperity has been depleting and poverty increasing is because foreign intervention and propaganda brainwash.

  • So tell me about communism, enlighten me, I've read the communist manifesto and done much research outside of that.

  • @ElWiiTard Get a job and start your own company, then you can have power too. don't bitch about class issues cuz if this were a communist state you would be a slave for your entire life.

  • @ElWiiTard Well, I don't know if capitalism has always been the system of the united states, but I do believe this country is great and yes the old style autocracies of europe and the rest of the world is bad. Well, that's just life, it might not be fair but you gotta live with what you got. Canadas not different the the US, I have oppurtunity, don't know if the same can be said for people in other countries where the government owns property. Pointless bickering about greed. fuck stupid people

  • Whats wrong with a society where with some hardwork, determination, and innovation will lead to prosperity and laziness will lead to poor social conditions? Isn't this what capitolism is? Wasn't capitolism established by those wishing to go away from european monarchy? I believe ever since the birth of western culture, there has been a movement to destroy it and restore the old way of doing things in which power is inherited by blood line.

  • Why is the united states the only country in the world that can not define correctly what socialism is?

    They have all been brainwashed, fed lie after lie, because it's "not american".

  • I really liked this video. Ah, the great Cataluña.

  • Is that Noam Chomsky talking in this video? It sounds like him.

  • Sadly, only straw man arguments are in the highest rated comment section.

  • I can see why my brother thanks you are a jackass.

  • Great video! Thumbs up.

  • No Jefferson? Libertarian/Anarchist Robert Anton Wilson dug Jefferson.

    I'm thoroughly sick of this nonsense conflict between "socialists" and "capitalists". You are both living in a fantasy world, these concepts don't exist outside of the abstract.

    I want to see capitalists acquiring property, and socialists distributing resources. I want to see everyone free to pursue their own individual interests. That is the only Anarchy. Ideology be damned.

  • Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

    Winston Churchill

    Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.

    Alexis de Tocqueville

  • @nhstategop Madison wanted the rich taxed to preserve a middle class. And, in the ultimate of ironies, Thomas Paine is used as a symbol for the tea parties when he was the most "socialist" of all the founding fathers. He suggested that all land belonged to the people and that in return for a system of private ownership of property, every citizen should receive 15 p. sterling from the government upon turning 21. He thought those 50 and over should receive a yearly stipend. Sounds like socialism.

  • Comment removed

  • the george orwell excerpt always makes me cry

  • @franzfaramir

    "It seemed queer, in the barber's shop, to see the Anarchist notice still on the wall, explaining that tips were prohibited. 'The Revolution has struck off our chains,' the notice said. I felt like telling the barbers that their chains would soon be back again if they didn't look out."

    -Orwell

  • In capitalism there are no such thing as "classes" or "masters!" There are just people who are more successful than others! "Wage slavery" is a complete myth. This is just human nature.

  • @CapitalismIsLiberty

    Wage slavery is a fact.

  • @PersianPaladin wow you're a statist hack. you need to watch some of my videos to get that state education camp brainwashing propaganda out of your head...

  • @CapitalismIsLiberty

    I am a libertarian socialist. That means I oppose the State, just as much as I oppose capitalism. Do your self a favour - READ MORE.

  • @PersianPaladin Libertarian socialist?! How the fuck is that possible?!

  • @nhstategop Why don't you go to wikipedia and look it up yourself so you don't have to seem so stupid.

  • @nhstategop "Libertarian socialist?! How the fuck is that possible?!"

    Libertarianism is belief in freedom. Socialism is the essence of freedom: in socialism, workers decide for themselves, democratically, how they are going to run their economic lives. Decisions are made for the sake of human beings, not bourgeois profits.

  • @QuatFax So when Stalin had millions of Ukrainians starved to death it was for the sake of humn beings? When New London COnneticut decided to turn an entire neighborhood into a wasteland and destroy people's houses with little compensation THAT was for the sake of human beings? When The state of Maine banned a college grad moving to Sweetwater Tx to pursue a career and forced him to stay in Maine 3rd worst job market in th US and force him on programs while fleecing him thats for sake of humans?

  • @nhstategop Mkay, Stalin was not a socialist. He CALLED himself a socialist, but that doesn't make him one. Socialism is worker control over production; under Stalin's regime, workers weren't in control of anything.

    What's all this nonsense about Connecticut and Maine? Neither state was ever socialist. What are you talking about?

  • @QuatFax - That's a good point. Hitler was a vegetarian. Gandhi was also a vegetarian. There is a difference between what a person is, and what a person does. Europeans caught between the Soviet Bloc and US/NATO power often described the choice between the two as "Trying to choose between gangsters in a bad neighborhood." Both sides were forms of State-capitalism. Both painted extreme ideological differences of themselves to convince people of a major difference where none ultimately existed.

  • @nhstategop If you want to throw stones at socialists for the guilt of Liberals and Stalin (who exterminated everyone who criticized him for not being a socialist), EXPLAIN how EVERY FASCIST REGIME IN HISTORY made alliances with Financiers, Capitalists and Conservatives before staging coups and taking power. Franco's phalangists allied with the Church. The Church, Ford, IBM, IG Farben supported Hitler? "Business Plot of 1932" sound familiar, Mr. Republican? It was a Republican plot after all.

  • @nhstategop Republicans, historically, were considered TO THE LEFT of Socialists; that whole universal suffrage thing was too much for most Socialists and Liberals to bear. "Libertarian" historically, and presently, is roughly synonymous with anarchist, the way "public relations" is synonymous with "propaganda" and "personalized" is synonymous with "privatized". There's something to be said for seriously reading books instead of drinking in college, you learn important details and win arguments.

  • @CapitalismIsLiberty Except when money is more important than people, there is a problem.

  • @MasterAdam100 oh right! and socialism cares about people? i don't think so. Capitalism is the most humanitarian economic system in history. it's natural and socialism is artificial.

    all we have to do is privatize everything! don't you know that the Greek economy is in ruins because of the government???!!! but a government worshiper like you wouldn't understand that. lol!

  • @CapitalismIsLiberty Profit is seen as the most important thing and everything goes unregulated. The Mafia would LOVE Capitalism. Oh wait, they do. I could make meth in the back of a bakery and no one would ever know. It's not the size of the government that matters. It's who's running it and how. The People are equal participants in society.

  • @CapitalismIsLiberty "All we have to do is privatize everything! ... but a government worshiper like you wouldn't understand that" --So, you argue for eliminating government and letting Financiers/Corporations/Blackw­ater rule like a Medici principate. You're an Anarcho-Capitalist. I'm sure you'd rather be called a "Libertarian Free-Market Advocate", which sounds far more wholesome. but is more of a lie than the first title. I call you a Fascist, because its less of a lie than anything else.

  • @CapitalismIsLiberty If you argue there are no classes in Capitalism, which are properly defined as groups distinguished by their ownership of property and the means of production, as well as the access to political power that ownership affords them, then you argue that Capitalism is a Socialist Utopia, just equal people distinguished by the difference in their hard work and innate ability. No middle class exists then, you argue. No homeless poor. No one able to get jobs others can't. Whatever.

  • God bless Alexander Hamilton Thomas Jefferson and all the founders of our great nation forever. Glad the libs are infuriated that they succeeeded.

  • @LibertyBell46 Their success is a liberal success you moron. Individual rights under Rule of Law, consent of the governed, private property, free-markets not owned by the church and the king, that "no one is inherently entitled to enjoy the benefits of liberal society more than anyone else, and all people are equal subjects before the law" -- the result of centuries of LIBERAL PHILOSOPHERS. By being an American conservative that believes in these things you are Liberal in the context of history.

  • More revisionist dogshit by the same people who support socialism, the worst system that ever was and has failed 100% where it has been tried.

  • @phantastickyle Tell an audience of senior citizens that Medicare and Social Security has failed 100%. Find a family whose father just got home from Iraq with an injury and is going through physical rehabilitation that the VA Healthcare system is a 100% failure and he should stop rehab. Tell the student that works full-time to give up her foodstamps (an agriculture subsidy) and financial aid. Tell every corporation to abandon tax loopholes set-up JUST FOR THEM because socialism is a failure.

  • When it shall be said in any country in the world, my poor are happy; neither ignorance nor distress is to be found among them; my jails are empty of prisoners, my streets of beggars; the aged are not in want, the taxes are not oppressive; the rational world is my friend, because I am the friend of its happiness: when these things can be said, then may that country boast its constitution and its government.

  • @SamWiseGingy Thomas Paine, Rights of Man

  • Its liberals that are taking away our rights, our money, our property ETC and not surprisingly they hate capitalism and hate the men who risked everything to give us our freedom.

  • @nhstategop I am a Liberal. I am YOUR Emmanuel Goldstein. Where are we and what are our intentions? Ask your trusted conservative nationalist who thinks all Liberals act as a Collective Entity. Liberal media? Keep dreaming. One of the best scapegoats you can use.

    Remember to keep obeying Big Brother's wishes and watch out for that Emmanuel Goldstein and his liberal followers!

  • @MasterAdam100 I noticed you have a communist flag on your main page.

  • @nhstategop Socialist actually. Just plain red.

  • More proof of liberal fascism. Capitalism has given us more stories of rags to riches and scientific discovery than socialism has destroyed nations and starved millions.

    You hate this country, go live in China. Do us all a favor.

  • @calstategop But they have the brain of a 2 year old. They still wont get it. Liberals are so stupid they need the state just to remind them to breathe. Bunch of spoiled kids who know no adult responsibility at all.

  • @calstategop an economical elite is just as bad as a state elite, i believe in a free market but a colectivized free market where the people involved in the process of production are the owners , where corporations are free to engage in friendly competition and trade where there are no millionares and no poor, where there is no state to opress and no economic inequality fuck communism and fuck capitalism its two different sides of the same coin

  • @calstategop I'll move to China to find real socialism when you prove that Christian Institutions (Protestant and Catholic), American corporations, financiers and banks didn't materially and publicly support Hitler, Mussolini, and Franco -- and all the other petty dictators in South America, Africa, and Asia throughout the 20th century. Yes, fascism is what happens in Liberal nations when conservatives and wealthy Liberals want to defeat socialism. You owe history nothing, don't lift a finger.

  • @iod3k WTF!? Why dont YOU prove it INSTEAD! Christian institutions supporting hitler!? HA! You never heard of st Maximillian Kolbe or Bonhoffer before have you?

  • @calstategop Yeah, I'm familiar with those men, and they died heroically for their beliefs, but they do not represent the majority of organized Christianity. For each of these men there were thousands of Ludwig Mullers. Here's a partial list of Christian leaders that gave public and material support to Hitler: Cardinal Bertram, Cardinal Schuster, Helmut Brucker, Walter Buch, Rudolf Buttmann, Dietrich Eckart, Joachim Hossenfelder. The list of Nazi christians goes on for volumes.

  • @iod3k Catholic church is hardly what I would call a christian church. As for protestants, they are the equivelent of Danny Yu of marxist china not to mention other Judas Iscariots throughout history who also supported the USSR Venezuela Hezbollah ETC. Like Paul Crouch or fr Allah Atta.

  • @nhstategop So, you think Catholics, who constitute the largest denomination of Christians worldwide, aren't really Christians? And Protestants are Marxist Judas Iscariot Paul Crouch's?? I guess that means they're not really Christians either? I'm starting to realize that you guys aren't just ignorant of the details of the things you're talking about, but you don't even really speak basic English. I can't take you seriously with that kind of bullsh*t.

  • @iod3k Most of the protestant denominations around the world are only interested in making money than leading the lost to christ. The catholic church is a church of Satan. You should go to Jack chick's website and read about alberto rivera and the assasination of abraham lincoln and how the vatican supports slavery.

  • @nhstategop Jack Chick, the guy who makes scary fundamentalist cartoon pamphlets you find in phone booths? lmao, sure dude. I'll get right on that. Good sources you got there.

  • @iod3k those pamphlets are based on rare literature from both Christian AND secular sources. The Alberto Rivera series is a good place to begin along with the betrayal, a graphic novel which was about what really lead to slavery the civil war and the assassination of Lincoln. They contain footnotes. You may have to order on Ebay or try gutenberg press to find it.

  • @iod3k Roman Catholicism is the devils cult and the pope is the anti-christ, Satan's viceroy on earth. End of story. Read Foxes book of martyrs if you want to know more.

  • @iod3k Yet he and Himmler ordered the SS to destroy Crucifixes and claimed that Jesus was the bastard son of a Jewish Whore.

  • @calstategop According to who -- Goebbels diary? So what? All famous Nazis were Christians; Goebbels married before a Protestant minister. Never read about Jesus being the son of a whore from Nazi sources, but I heard that all the time when I was in Israel. Jewish histories dating back to the 1st century record Jesus as an illusionist and criminal trained in Egypt, a bastard born out of wedlock and a pervert; modern conservatives in Israel hate and defame Jesus as much as they do Muhammad. So?

  • @iod3k Hitler prentended to be Christian. He also prentended to support civil liberties like firearms ownership. He claimed that the jews wanted to ban guns just like the KKK Liberals did in this country. The first thing he did when he took over was ban guns. the KKK supported gun bans to make it easier to lynch their victims. Hitler also went to work persecuting the church. If you watch the film why we fight which was about WW2 it shows anti religious speeches and laws used by the 3rd reich.

  • This is the biggest load of crap I've heard since Obummers last speech! Without the Capitalist who would be working? Who pays YOUR salary? A rich man? If you hate our way of life so much..move to Mexico..China..Russia..take your pick..just get out and take your Socialist notions with you!!

  • @usgop Why don't you deport us then, fascist? Come kick down my door, and take the risk yourself. But wait -- Why exile me when you could send me to a prison factory, that would eliminate wages altogether and drive profits through the ROOF!!

  • @iod3k If I had the power..I would deport you...prison is out of the question....it would only cost us taxpayers to keep your sorry butts up and we're already paying ENOUGH!!

  • @usgop That admission proves, more than any argument or accusation I could ever make, that those of you on the right are Fascists beneath the surface, and liars when it comes to democracy and the constitution. You would load your political opposition onto freight trains and ship them to some kind of Siberia or Auschwitz "if you only had the power", the way the Nazis shipped off communists and dissenters. May your wildest dreams all come true, my friend. May you live to see them become reality.

  • @iod3k What a great place the world would be without liberal scum such as yourself. Don't try and portray your Nazi Socialist party as the good guys..the majority of Americans know better. BTW..I am not your friend.

  • @usgop Let me help you out, so you don't break a nail trying to open an encyclopedia. I can't be a "liberal", because I'm anti-statist, anti-corporate, anti-neoliberal. No one can be a "Nazi Socialist", that's an oxymoron. You meant to say "National Socialist", or the sly title the Nazis gave themselves to make their argument that there were no classes in Hitler's Reich, and Socialism was obsolete. The single unified "Volk" now made classes non-existent. See Nazi play 'Schlageter' by Hanns Jost.

  • @iod3k You appear to be anti everything....looks like you are a nobody. Excuse me..I left out the comma between Nazi and Socialist. They both come out the same in the wash....destructive for humanity. Since I am not on YT to argue..I'll say goodbye..GOODBYE.

  • @usgop You can call me a "Nazi" all day, but the GOP has ACTUAL Nazis in it. Jim Russell, NY (Miscegenation paper fame) ring a bell? JT Ready, AZ. Al Reynolds, IL. David Duke, head of the GOP committee in St.Tammany. Billy Roper. Carl Paladino. Mark Williams. TPAC recruits on Stormfront, as do other TeaParty groups. Ron and Rand Paul took $ from Don Black and Stormfront. Sen. Pearce works w/ Nazis in AZ including Stormfront. THE GOP HAS MORE SWAZTIKA-WAVING NAZIS THAN A NUREMBERG RALLY!!

  • @iod3k What do you think the Democratic party is made up of???? Besides KKK members? I am not familiar with the info you supplied on the GOP..(don't let my name fool you) I don't like or trust ANY politician, but I'd slit my own throat before I'd cast a vote for a liberal,,communist..socailist.­.KKK Democrat.

  • @usgop Don't be lazy, go Google the names I listed. And list some Dems if you want, but I'm not a Dem or a Lib -- AND NEITHER ARE YOU -- answer for your own party/faction/demonination/wha­tever Herr "us-G-O-P". You can claim not to be one but you use the party name in your own Screen name for chrissakes. Pull the mote out of thine own eye FIRST before accusing everyone else.

  • @iod3k I am not a Republician...I do tend to vote that way because in my opinion they are the most conservative and more in line with my beliefs. When I picked the name, it was to draw attention period. I suppose all the info you are referring to came from liberals..so no thanks. Like I said..I'm not here to argue.

  • @usgop Well, I AM a Republican and a Libertarian-Syndicalist. It doesn't mean what you've been told to think, and we've argued for days now, so you're here to argue. It's easier to say "It must be a lie because it came from someone bad". I'm sure that's how you wound up with the beliefs you have now, by being either lazy or scared. The best way to prove me wrong about you would simply be to go Google. You don't even have to tell me about it, it can be private. Knowledge is power, get more of it.

  • @iod3k YOU have been arguing..read the comments. End of comments.

  • @usgop lmao!! - No shit Sherlock, I - AM - here for an argument; you're ending each new post with "Anyway, I'm not here to argue" and bullshit. Call me a Nazi-Commie-Slaver then say you're not arguing and can't be bothered to consider my info. Ok, I win then - how bout them apples?

    You're arguing, it's an argument, get over it or GTFO.

  • Meanwhile the leftists praise butchers and slavers such as Joseph Stalin, V Lenin and Mao T Dung.

    IF you hate this country so much why don't you move to China and let us enjoy our freedom.

  • @minnesotastategop

    I rather stay here to enjoy and expand the freedoms that activists like me won for the wage slave majority. Equating criticism of the elite with hatred of the country constitutes the essence of totalitarianism. In fact, in doing so, you adopt a central doctrine of those dictators you mention.

  • @mr1001nights Your not crticizing the elite, your using out of context quotes from the founding fathers to advocate abolishing constitutional liberty with a system of slavery and totalitariansm that has killed more people in the last century than in history and that has made nations destitute and impoverished.

  • @nhstategop

    ur assumption falls within the elite propaganda framework:

    That you must choose between capitalist or other statistic masters (e.g.stalinists)

  • @mr1001nights That old cartoon where they run that guy out of town... what is that called?

  • @mr1001nights I will take capitalism which has benefited me and this nation greatly over Stalinist statism. Look at our history and look at Russia's history. We have free speech free press freedom to assemble, and all they had was a collective that murdered their own people. Capitalistic masters? What capitalistic masters? In capitalist America we the people are our own masters as opposed to the USSR.

  • @nhstategop

    1- false dichotomy : It's either the US or the USSR

    2- US freedoms were won by ppl fighting against capitalism

  • @mr1001nights US freedoms were won by ppl fighting against capitalism

    WRONG it was the exact opposite it waswon by pple fighting for capitalism against statism.

  • @nhstategop No, it was definitely people fighting against capitalism. We're talking about the trade union movement, the historical effort to put people before profits in business. Trade unionists fought for decades against capitalism. To the extent that the trade unions aren't effective today, it is because they have gotten in bed with the government and with big business.

  • @QuatFax Trade Unions are part of the reason for economic problems. They are extorting big business and putting them out of business and encouraging outsourcing. The founding fathers had nothing to do with that. If they fought against capitalism, then we would have gone the way of the French in 1789 and be way ahead of Europe in freebies for bums, unemployment and oppresion.

  • @nhstategop Trade unions are good for the economy. They give workers more power and allow for a middle-class. The fact that businesses are moving overseas proves only that Chinese and Indian workers need to unionize (which they are, finally).

    Europe is capitalist. Any system that doesn't put workers in control of production is far from socialist. And Europe isn't any worse off than the US is.

    Who cares what the "founding fathers" thought? They were plutocratic, racist slave drivers.

  • @mr1001nights You're either with us or you're with the terrorists... sound familiar?

    Freedom is a word, used for advantage and nothing more.

    Not much has changed. We are just as gullible as ever.

  • @nhstategop "In capitalist America we the people are our own masters..."

    If I'm a wage slave working for 7.25 an hour (the minimum wage in your state) and I can barely afford rent (thank the landlords in Manch for raising prices to make more money) or food I really don't see how I'm my "own master" if my entire life is dominated by masters (bosses, landlords, bankers, etc.). It may not fit with your or Ron Paul's vision but that's capitalism.

  • @juliaisafilmbuff123 For that matter, am I my own "Master" if I don't own the product of my labor? If I have to give it away to someone who will profit from its sale for hundreds of times my pay, while I never get ahead? Tell me business school grads do not set out in the world to buy cheap and sell large, and profit from moving things around. TELL ME THIS ISN'T THE MOTIVATE FOR COMPANIES TO MOVE PRODUCTION OVERSEAS. Why shouldn't workers own the factories they work in and the things they make?

  • @nhstategop Socialism is not the system of the Soviet Union. The USSR was a state capitalist system. The core notions of socialism are egalitarianism and worker control of production. The USSR was an extremely inegalitarian, stratified society, and workers weren't in control of shit.

  • @nhstategop As opposed to capitalism killing the supposed 100 million people that Communism has in a decade instead of a century?

  • @minnesotastategop WHATS FUNNY IS THIS ISNT CAPITALISM...ITS NATIONAL SOCIALISM....NAZI....AND THEY ARE JUST USING THE SPANISH PEOPLE TO CARRY OUT THERE AGENDA.....THEY ARE NOTHING MORE THAN CHAOS CREATORS FOR THEM...PERIOD!!!! AND WE DO LOVE THIS COUNTRY WE ARE JUST FULL!!!

  • If we are fighting for freedom and democracy, why would we move to China?

  • @adi12372 Liberals have never fought for any freedom. Just the opposite. Just ask the Great Grandad in Chicago who is now in trouble for defeding his property his life and grandchildren because of your damn laws.

  • @minnesotastategop Lenin, Stalin, and Mao were not socialists. The core notion of socialism is worker control over production. In the USSR and in the PRC, workers weren't in control of anything. These men were right-wing abberations against the socialist movement.

  • @QuatFax Right wing? So Now the founding fathers were aristocratic tyrants and NOW Mao, Stalin Lenin were right wing? WTF?

  • @minnesotastategop The founding fathers were certainly aristicrats, and many wanted a fairly tyrannical society. And Lenin, Stalin, and Mao were certainly right wing. They wanted society to be owned and controlled by a small elite. Leftism requires that the common people own and control society. Lenin, Stalin, and Mao certainly weren't advocating that.

  • @QuatFax If the founders wanted a tyranical society, they would never have established a constitution and George Washington would be King George I

  • @minnesotastategop The founders wanted a society that served their collective interests. The oligarchy they created did a very good job of that. There was no need for a king.

    If the founders wanted a free society, they would have abolished slavery, gave women the vote, and would not have passed laws like the Alien and Sedition Acts.

  • @minnesotastategop Washington gave a speech against that plan, which was formally made to him by a faction within the Philadelphia congress and his own command. He considered it seriously. The argument against was that Washington was descended from royalty, and claiming a crown might vitiate the the Revolution and empower the conservative loyalists in the colonies. It would have created a civil war while giving England an excuse not to withdraw. Not all the founders shared the same beliefs.

  • @minnesotastategop While arguing for the establishment of a Senate, James Madison most famously said "[Government] ought to be so constituted as to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority." Alexander Hamilton speaking of Americans said "“Your 'people', sir, is nothing but a great beast”. They were petit bourgeosie, and related to royalty. George Washington most famously (descendant of Edward III of England).

  • @iod3k OUt of context. Madison was speaking of the dangers of Democracy which Ben Franklin pointed out was two wolves and a lamb voting one what to eat. Madison was worried that 51% could cancel out the other half or ever vote to exterminate them. And Alexander Hamilton quoteswere along that same lines. I for one do not want my vote being cancelled by some lazy bum who wants free handouts from the government so he can slack off and not work like the rest of us. That is Obama's voting base BTW

  • @minnesotastategop The part of Madison's quote that is properly shocking, and makes the point that plutocracy was part of the Founder's design, is the part about protecting the opulent minority from the poor majority, and that the way to do this was to secure the opulent minority's power within government's design. Not then, and not now, does the "opulent" constitute 49% of the populace, and your quote isn't found in Franklin's writings. Check the wiki or google answers for details on misquote.

  • @iod3k he was talking about the American people in general. that does not mean however that 60% can destroy the rights of the other 40% like in pure democracy neither does it mean plutocracy. that comment was taken completely out of context. If the founders wanted a plutocracy they would not have allowed ordinary citizens the right to keep weapons, the right to free speech, peaceful assembly and freedom of the press. Ironically liberals are against all of those things.

  • @minnesotastategop Haven't you heard of "Dorr's Rebellion"? Until 1888, you had to white, male, and a taxpaying landowner to vote; women couldn't until 1917. That's about 85% of adults denied representation. It took decades of Republicans fighting for universal suffrage to change. Jefferson spent his life fighting for "the consent of the governed" and Lincoln GAVE his life to give "consent" to a minority of former slaves. We didn't even BEGIN to reverse plutocracy until the 20th century. L2wiki

  • @iod3k At the time, it was felt that it would be better for property owners only to be able to vote to prevent what were seeing today. Poor people demanding that people who are successful be forced to pay nearly all that they have to go to those who don't work as hard or who don't want to work period. Today we have that. I must work harder and have part of my paycheck taken out to pay for some lazy housing project excrement who sits in bed smoking canibis and crystal meth and not get up to work.

  • @minnesotastategop Yes because the unemployed and the poor are just lazy... Poverty and unemployment have absolutely nothing to do with the class stratified society. It has nothing to do with the unequal power relationships in social and economic life does it? Maybe before writing nonsense you should take a look at reality.

  • @neoptolemus Most of them are. its sad but true. Life has checks and balances you make wrong decisions like have out of wedlock babies, spend your savings on drugs and alcohol, live for today ETC that is what you get.

  • @minnesotastategop So just because a few people take advantage of a program that is beneficital to society we have to get rid of it.

    Seriously, I hope for your sake you do not lose your job. Otherwise you are dead. MINNESOTA is cold too!

  • @turnofffox A few people? HA! Nearly all of them are! That's the dictatorship of the Proletariot for you.

    Also, I used to be homeless before. I know what its like. Socialism did NOTHING to help. NOTHING. It was christian charity and hard work that got me out of there not liberal BS like this video.

  • @minnesotastategop Nearly all of them? I didn't have that problem when I went to the welfare office, on account of Bush being in charge.

    I used to be homeless before. SO? What's your point?

    Socialism did NOTHING to help. NOTHING.

    Explain...

    It was christian charity and hard work that got me out of there

    Oh right. Christian charity. BS! These people give lip service to the poor compared to welfare.

  • @turnofffox I used to be homeless before. SO? What's your point?

    point is I have been poor before, I know what its like. Socialism didn't help me. I had to go through all these hoops, fill out forms, paperwork ETC it took me hours even days! Even case managers couldn't or wouldn't help. Christian charity doesn't do that? If I want to eat a meal at the mission Idon't have to wait for 2 hours in line then fill out 50 pages of forms present 3 forms of ID. ETC After all that I got nothing but lip.

  • @minnesotastategop So how exatly did the system let you down in a big way? How exactly did you get off the streets?

  • @turnofffox I just told you! Its nothing but bureacracy, long waits, the people in charge care more about geting paid from taxpayers than helping you, the case workers create more problems then there already are. Bottom line, you put government in charge of anything expect failure. I got off the streets because caring compasionate christians with the spirit of God came to my aid. They fed me clothed me aided in finding employment and helped me get into a network.

  • @turnofffox There was a Transient home outside St Paul. They brought me there, they gave me a job and tasks as part of rent, in addition I was expected to look for work. (the homes no longer exist becuase government regulated them to death. Government wants to monopolize helping the poor so they can fuck everything up) I found it, I got an apartment in Rochester and , that's it. years of depending on government did nothing compared to what a few months with Christians did. Socialism fails again.

  • @minnesotastategop So this transient home. Why would the government just shut it down. They must have had a reason What if rsidents are unable to find work? what if they're disabled and dont get benefits?

    Government wants to monopolize helping the poor so they can fuck everything up

    I don't see that happening unless these ministries were fucking things up. I found it, I got an apartment in Rochester and , that's it.

    Oh Really? Im sure there was something else to it.

  • @turnofffox Why would the government just shut it down? Because the government wants a totalitarian control over everything like liberal germany. They want the poor to starve and die like in the EU.

    What if rsidents are unable to find work? what if they're disabled and dont get benefits?

    Um.. They HELP THEM? DERRR!!!

    I don't see that happening unless these ministries were fucking things up.

    They weren't its government that's fucking things up. Obama's reign comes to mind.

  • @minnesotastategop I don't think so. They must have had a real reason. Anyway I can't imagine why the government would want to create poverty on purpose since that depletes a tax base by destroying prosperous jobs and oppertunities. Totalitarian control? Liberal Germany? EU? HA! GOODWINS LAW FAIL! In the EU they don't have a homeless problem. THEY help their needy. The government does anyway and does a good job of it.

  • @turnofffox The government does. One way is with stupid rules and regulations against business. Cap and trade for instance if it passes will destroy 54 million manufacturing jobs in America. Talk about liberl progress. The libs know this to be true and they don't care/ California also eliminated 20 million farm jobs and created a dustbowl in what used to be one of the biggest producers of food in the world. All to protect some stupid fish. GO live in EU if you are so confident you'll be safe.

  • @minnesotastategop No actually those corporations are making record profits and its really because jobs go overseas. I doubt environmental regulations had anything to do with California's food problem. I mean its a desert. Of course stuff like that happens. One solution is using tax money for public works in California to create desalinization plants and new irrigation. But we can't afford it since you're all scared it might cut into record profits!!

    A

  • @turnofffox 1 Where did you learn that corporations make record profits?

    2 Desalinization is really no that effective. WE COULD USE MORE IRRAGATION BUT THAT WOULD KILL ALL THE FISH AND SCREW HUNGRY POOR PEOPLE SO SAY YOU.

  • And BTW I think i might have to live in the EU soon since the GOP has ruined my country.

  • @turnofffox Fine by me. Enjoy getting rammed in the ass by your new marxist slave masters

  • @QuatFax I agree with you that Lenin, Stalin, and Mao were not what they claimed, and ultimately betrayed the ideologies of their movements, but they were certainly a kind of socialism. If you criticize Marx-Leninism for not being socialist enough, for not giving worker-collectives control and ownership over the products of their labor, that's a valid Syndicalist argument against State-capitalism, and I agree with you. I wonder if more Tea-baggers knew about Syndicalism if they'd be for it ... ?

  • @minnesotastategop I'm sorry, butchers? What was the Iraq/Afghanistan civilian casualty count under Bush, the former "GOP Jesus" and "Dear, Beloved Leader"? Add to it the American dead of 9/11, which he failed to prevent despite warnings in the President's Daily Breifing, and the American losses fighting to find WMD that never existed, and to occupy a medieval desert -- how many is that again? You GOP guys love a good bloodbath in the morning, who are you kidding? "NUKE EM ALL" right? lmao

  • @iod3k That was a war in self defense. Liberals hate that. They always support the aggresors like in WW2. I don't see you hippies picketing gainst Al-qaeda. It doesnt come close the casualties inflicted by communism in the last century. Not even by a fraction. George Bush? He was anti Christian and liberal. He belongs to skull and bones, he worshiped at a shinto shrine, he also increased social spending 3 fold.

  • Comment removed

  • @minnesotastategop FDR got us into WW2, hello? New Deal Democrat? Big State Socialism with a capital "S" -- Harry Truman ordered the first atomic bomb dropped on Japan. Kennedy got us into Vietnam, LBJ escalated, and Nixon -- a Republican -- got us out. Classically, Republicans are anti-foreign wars, just like Ron Paul. You revealed a sign that you were once a Bush supporter there dude. If you were a Ron Paul supporter, you'd know about his Letters of marque and reprisal H.R. 3076

  • @minnesotastategop Thomas Jefferson was less of a Christian than Bush was. Bush only praised Jesus, the Bible, and religion. Jefferson wrote that the Bible contained "so much ignorance, so much absurdity, so much untruth, charlatanism and imposture, as to pronounce it impossible that such contradictions should have proceeded from the same Being." He determined to separate the "gold from the dross", the "diamonds" from the "dunghill," and he put together his own "Jefferson Bible."

  • @iod3k Yet he had this to say...

    The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend all to the happiness of man

    The practice of morality being necessary for the well being of society, He [God] has taken care to impress its precepts so indelibly on our hearts that they shall not be effaced by the subtleties of our brain. We all agree in the obligation of the moral principles of Jesus and nowhere will they be found delivered in greater purity than in His discourses

  • brilliant vidoe! Indeed the really rich and powerfull probably laugh at their minor competitors who want "smaller government" and less taxes and no state welfare at all. High taxes, minimal welfare and expensive projects that are financing big corporations keep things running, keep us in check and provide minimal stability so we don't revolt.

    Indeed they need the state. The state that exists today. Who is narrating this btw? Chumskey?

  • @omfg4000 sounds more like Hillary Clinton to me.

  • It's so funny that you would defend a money- grubbing hypocrite like Michael Moore, and demonize regular people actually trying to make a positive difference like the Tea Partiers.

    It really says a lot about where your priorities lie, and why I'm rather eat a rat sandwich than even consider the thought of becoming an Anarchist.

    btw, for your one Timothy MacVeigh, I could name a dozen liberal terrorists/ murderers whose views are pretty much identical to yours.

  • @Adamguy2003 Timothy McVeigh. "Sons of Gestapo" attack, Hyder, Ariz. Willie Ray Lampley, Cecilia Lampley, John Dare Baird. Joseph Martin Bailie, Edward Hurst, Reno NV. Peter Kevin Langan and Scott Stedeford. Ray Hamblin. Larry Wayne Shoemake. Robert Edward Starr III and William James McCranie Jr. Gary Curds Baer and the "Viper Team". Eric Robert Rudolph. John Pitner. "Phineas Priests": Charles Barbee, Robert Berry and Jay Merrell. James Charles Kopp. Leo Felton. All are pre-2001, more since.

  • @Adamguy2003 (More right-wing terrorists for Adamguy2003 to name a dozen for each he's offered) Chris Scott Gilliam. Benjamin Matthew Williams and James Tyler Williams. Benjamin Nathaniel Smith. Buford Furrow. James Kenneth Gluck. Kevin Ray Patterson and Charles Dennis Kiles. Donald Beauregard. Mark Wayne McCool. Richard Baumhammers. Fritz Springmeier. Steve Anderson. Clayton Lee Wagner. Irving David Rubin. Michael Edward Smith. David Burgert. Charles Robert Barefoot Jr. Robert J. Goldstein.

  • @Adamguy2003 (More CONVICTED right-wing terrorists for Adamguy2003) Larry Raugust. Matt Hale. James D. Brailey. David Wayne Hull. David Roland Hinkson. William Krar. John Noster. Norman Somerville. Sean Gillespie. Wade and Christopher Lay. Ivan Duane Braden. Demetrius "Van" Crocker. Gabriel Carafa. Daniel J. Schertz. Shawn Robert Adolf, Tharin Robert Gartrell. Nathan D. Johnson. Daniel Cowart and Paul Schlesselman. Richard Andrew Poplawski. Scott Roeder. James von Brunn ... Shall I name more?

  • @Dedhedted71 Ron Paul's policies would sell the country out to profit-seeking businesses. Under de-centralizing everything, even smaller businesses will have the ability to control the government, causing A LOT of harm against the working people. Paul isn't a "revolutionary". He is doing what the business class wants.

  • @Dedhedted71 And you don't understand the wage system.

  • @Dedhedted71 lets pile the bussinesman in an island and watch then how they survive....

    lets do the same expirament with 10 000 specialized workers from peasants, to plumers to teachers to doctors....

    hm..

  • They all go hand in hand friend.

  • @amet1980 =))) Good idea. when do we start? Or do we just talk and smash some Mc-Donalds windows?

  • No. He is doing what free people want. I was working class once and was unionized. That's what unions are for. Privatize everything!

  • @juliaisafilmbuff123 Then go live in North Korea if you hate Ron Paul so much.

  • @nhstategop Ummmm, no thanks. I'd rather stay in the US (maybe even come back to NH) to enjoy the freedoms that unions, feminists, and civil rights activists fought for me to have, and to fight all the oppression that the US perpetrates throughout the world and against its own people. Hey, I could even unionize my workplace in NH after you "free state" "anarcho"-capitalists take it over and implement your 1776-style bullshit.

  • @juliaisafilmbuff123 It'd be better for both of us if you left. That 1776 Bullshit you complain about is why we have freedom and liberty. Which liberals hate. NH used to be the best state in America before liberals swarmed in and cancelled out our votes. Now we have nothing but boondock gutter filth in our cities using up our taxes so they don't have to work like the rest of us, forming gangs, and generally being a nuisiance. Another 10 years, were gonna look just like Massofchewedshits.

  • @nhstategop No, our freedom and liberty doesn't come from those on top of us but rather those next to us. No constitution or government gave me my freedom; my freedom comes from the people who fought AGAINST hierarchal and authoritarian systems and institutions (such as capitalism).

    So what are you going to do about NH? Kick anyone whose skin is darker than "butterscotch" out?

  • @nhstategop You'd fit better in North Korea with your "Glorious Leader" authority-cult worship, and attitude of sending everyone who disagrees with you into exile abroad. Ask Kim Jong-Il's son Kim Jong-Nam how he likes Macau after criticizing daddy. Also, ask Kim Jong-Nam what he thinks of political dynasties like our Bush dynasty, one I'm sure you supported gleefully while it shredded the constitution, balooned debt and deregulated Wall Street before there was a black man in the White House.

  • @iod3k I didn't suppport Bush. I supported Alan Keyes who thanks to you liberals and your caterwulting prevented from becoming our first real president of African American hereitge. George Bush was a liberal. He spent more on social spending than Clinton did, he supported Illegal alien amnesty and loose borders and sent us on a wild goose chase Thats what you get for relying on government. Liberals should be encouraged to renounce their citizen ship and live in marxist countries.

  • @nhstategop With Obama as the current president, aren't you arguing that WE ALREADY LIVE IN a Marxist country? So maybe YOU should go live in Israel and wait for the Apocalypse. Red Heffer is coming! (lmao) Anyway, why don't you support the president in a time of war? Are you a traitor? Where's your patriotism? Why won't you support the troops and the Commander in Chief while our country is in the midst of a struggle?