Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • OIF! And on April Fool's Day, of all things.

  • Fleischer is a real smarty. There's no way he didn't know what that stood for. Personally I wonder who was responsible for that acronym. That would be interesting to know.

  • Amazing! I love how they mock us to our faces!

  • An opps. Glad they changed it for you conspiracy nuts...

    oh and by the way, energy security is kind of a BFD

  • @QUINTIX256 "Energy" security or "Oil" security? Because there are plenty of other ways to "secure energy" without wasting a trillion dollars and the lives of tens of thousands.

    It clearly is not a big enough deal to consider reducing our dependence upon foreign oil to keep the Oil Companies and Defense Industry rich.

  • @BI30 Yeah, like nuclear. Oh wait, libs like you have blocked all development in that field for over a generation now. Looking liberal energy policies, its obvious you want energy costs to be so high it blocks economic growth.

  • @mason6883 Nuclear power is neither clean nor green (I refer you to both Japan & Chernobyl.) Keeping the nation dependent upon 100 year old fossil-fuel powered technology, and voting against renewable energy projects doesn't exactly stimulate "economic growth". I also refer you to my blog (see my profile for link) this week for my report on "$4 gas. The problem isn't Supply."

  • @BI30 If you using Japan & Chernobyl as examples of what can go wrong, you are either ignorant or lying. The reactor at Chernobyl was not only lacking in even basic fail-safes, and researchers at the plant were running dangerous experiments at the the time of the meltdown.

  • @mason6883 I'll give you Chernobyl if you concede Japan and it's GE-made Mach-3 reactor.

  • @BI30 In Japan, a group of 8 separate 40 year old reactors survived the third biggest earthquaked in human fucking history, only taking minor damages. It took a tsnumi wiping out backup diesel generator for there to be any problems, and even then the problem was contained. The amount of people who absorbed more radiation then in an x-ray was very small, and even with the minor radiation leaks, there was less ambient radiation then in Denver, CO.

  • @mason6883 If you are claiming the reactors in Japan "survived" to suggest nuclear power is safe, you are "either ignorant or lying" (to quote you). If you think the area around those reactors is "safe", may I suggest your next vacation spot?

  • @BI30 Also, China has been making very big strides Thorium reactors, which are far cheaper and pose very little threat even under worse case scenarios. Because their nation isn't made up of anti-science Luddites like you, they will soon have access to near free electricity, allowing them to cut their costs of manufacturing even more and putting us even further behind. They will even be able to cheaply power their cargo ships with such reactors.

  • @mason6883 While Thorium-based reactors are a significant advance, Thorium fuel is MUCH more difficult to "breed", requiring more resources to produce enough Thorium to power a single reactor. And the by-products of its production are highly corrosive.

    Thorium reactors have major advantages over traditional reactors, but Green power is SO much cheaper with NONE of the hazardous by-products that the costs outweigh the benefits.

  • That guys a fascist.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more