rofl, its just the other way around, this could be a satire, but i fear they mean it seriously.
Practically all the creationists arguments have been debunked over and over again. But since they tend to lie and hope the public isnt aware that their arguments are fraudulent they still use them. This whole video is one big fat lie and nothing else
Don't you fundies ever get tired of this lame crap?
You present an unimaginative diatribe regarding some publications and draw unlikely conclusions with no evidence. It's in no way surprising as you have no evidence to offer but I remain perplexed by your motive. Trust me and the rest of the informed and educated people, it's not convincing anyone of anything except your dogmatic ignorance.
On one point I would concur - you did not evolve, far enough.
reconstruction of facial features from a skull are used in forensics. they are admissible in court. we can determine from the skeletal remains, the age, the gender and race.
Genesis, offers a view of evolution which is more radical than making man a descendant of the ape. It claims that he came from the dust of the ground.
The facial features of a living being cannot be determined by it's remains? BAHAHAHA! Fuck man,I guess those forensic artists who use bone remains of unknown murder victims to draw accurate sketches of what the person looked like when alive are all in on the evolution plot to make it seem like such things are possible.
Like every creationist video on Ewetoob, it showcases the woefull and willfull ignorance of the proponents of this gobbledegook on the basic tenents of evolutionary theory. The fervor and volume with which an individual attempts to dismiss or discredit evolutionary theory is always inversely proportionate to that individuals understanding of it. Pure, unadulterated bullshit.
Damn, I would like to see the face of a Christian fundie watching this, nodding in approval the whole way through, then coming to the concluding "that divine creator is Allah"....that must be priceless. Hah!
It's priceless because even though it's still the abrahamic god, it implies that there are grave differences between their beliefs about creation. All of them wrong, ofcourse, but that's a different story.
So evolution, with it's known, historically verifiable author (Darwin NOT classical Greece or Sumerian) is "myth". Who then, was author of the old testament? his or her provenance? explain. (mind you, all this creationist shit is for Americans, with their awful, backward education system)
Like so many things religious people try to feed you, this video is full of half truths. It uses cherry picked facts for persuasion. Religion breeds terrorism.
the theroy doesn't rest on "something from nothing" it rests on the idea that a singularity existed for eternity, because time didn't exist and then collapsed into itselfthus creating the universe, and a new dimension.
along with that, many scientific theories that have nothing to do with evolution or any other hot-button issue of the sort have been introduced, and then disproven some time in the future.
in my mind, propiganda is statements through media and other influential mediums that convey one opinion with little room for the adaptaion of other's thoughts. this video does exactly that. is it possible that there is a higher power? with all the new things we're finding in science these days that we thought to be impossible in previous times, it'd be ignorant to completely shut out the idea. if ther is, we weon't know for another good 1000 years.
yes, our only evidence may be skull fragments and tibia. but we also have carbon dating, knowledge of the environment at that time, which can help us reconstruct possible facial features. multiple faces to one skull isn't an attept to prove anything, it's called trial and error.
There are a lot of misunderstanding of what Darwin actually was trying to say. He was saying that he observed that dominate traits would emerge in offspring, this is true, but that doesn't make for new species.
You do not have to be religious in order to also not believe in evolution. Evolution proposes that species of animals evolved into NEW and DIFFERENT species, this is another problem with the theory because modern SCIENCE, not religion says that this is impossible. Species can only adapt to live in different conditions and the fittest survive passing on the dominate genes, but not turning into an entirely new species, just another hyocracy that any non-religious person can easily see.
Incorrect. The mechanism of Natural Selection results in the formation of new species as a gradual, cumulative consequence of beneficial mutation. Pray tell, what scientific discipline states that animals do not evolve into new and different species-given sufficient time of course.
NO amount of time creates a new species, and there is no such thing as "beneficial mutation" real life is not an x-man movie, mutations are always screw-ups actually. Genes don't magically turn into a different species dude, no amount of time can change this fact.
The evolution theory and the big bang theory propose that species can evolve into new species because it is just that, a THEORY, they need some way to explain things that they don't understand, however modern science has proven that really species can not turn into new species through mutation or time.
Research mutation and look for records of any BENEFICIAL mutations. You won't find any. What is your definition of science by the way 'cause different people have different definitions. A theory is just a set of ideas but can never be proven because you need to develope a testable hypothesis to see if you get reliable results, the same results need to be abtained over and over to make something proven, that's what science is to me and the real scientific world.
Did I say "beneficial EVOLUTION"?? I think I said "beneficial MUTATION" because that was the argument being made by you or someone else here earlier. And you avoided my challenge to find examples of it too, there simply aren't any, and you or someone else here said that evolution involved benificial mutation, so what do you think?
Mylan, seriously now...there are HUNDREDS OF SCIENTIFICALLY STUDIED AND DOCUMENTED EXAMPLES OF BENEFICIAL MUTATION. Period. Do some research. Google some medical research sites for a start. It's easy.
There's an old saying, it says something along the lines of no point in arguing with a fool. I've done my research believe me, you are thinking that I'm closed minded maybe? I'm more open minded then you know, I'm open minded enough to see that evolution is only a theory, and we both know that theories can't ever be proven right? As far as menificial mutation goes....well I've never found any examples of mutation that actually are beneficial.
All the examples I've beneficial mutation I've researched are not mutation at all but rather only the survival of the fitest, the classic example of moths changing colors during the industrial revolution was not mutation, only survival of the fitest.
Ahhh...but what creates differences that may lead to changes in reproduction potential...ie survival of the fittest? That would be, among others, mutation. See the connection! If moths were all white, the single moth with a grey mutation would have a greater chance of more descendents.
Ohhh, I now see your definition of mutation, ok then, there are lots of examples of this. You call it mutation, I don't, then we are on the same page, it doesn't matter what it's called just what's actually happening in the process. You say the grey moth had a mutation to become grey in the first place, well the research says that the grey moth was ALREADY around, so it didn't mutate from anything.
You see Darwin talked about the survival of the fittest and the most dominate genes and most fitting genes for the enviroment survive and reproduce, however he said that those genes and dna where already there but sometimes just recessive so we don't see them, like the grey moth, and Darwins classic example with white and pink flower on pea plants.
How's this for a problem with the evolutionary theory.....where did the material come from that was involved with the big bang? No, better yet, where was this material at the time of the big bang, in space? Where did space come from? You tell me that only a Christian thinks this is a flaw? Tell me how this isn't a problem?
"How's this for a problem with the evolutionary theory.....where did the material come from that was involved with the big bang?"
It's no problem at all. Evolutionary theory isn't concerned with the origins of the universe, or even the advent of life. Evolution deals strictly with change.
Yep, you're a fundie all right. So now you're going to lie about being Christian?
I guess you havn't heard of a thing called Philosophy have you? Talking about the issues from all angles, open minded without denial. I don't understand you dude, you say you believe in the evolution theory but aren't conserned about the orgins of the earth? If you are going to use science to explain how species have developed don't you need something from science to explain where the material came from to start the process of evolution?
What are your thoughts on the big bang? Do you believe it? Or do you have some other ideas about the process of life and our planet before the time line that the evolution theory covers?
I find it strange that you aren't interested in it. It seems foolish to me to believe so strongly in science and evolution and not even be interested in all the other necessary steps just to get to a point where there is something to evolove.
Well consider that there was a creator, a creator who made things the way they are, without evolution. Is it impossible that there is a higher power? Why is it impossible?
"Well consider that there was a creator, ... who made things the way they are, without evolution."
See, I knew you were a creationist. There may or may not be a creator. Regardless, it is outside of the realm of science since it can't be scientifically tested. Science validated evolutionary theory decades ago, and adds more evidence every day.
Let's forget the evolutionary theory for a moment, let's talk about orgins....correct me if i'm wrong, the only theory that science has towards the orgins of our universe is the big bang correct?
Very common answer for someone who is either a fool or in denial and doesn't want to face the tough facts that threaten his beliefs isn't it? I don't need a response for this comment, I know how people work, i'm a Psychologist.
For an alleged psychologist, two things stand out. 1. You are entirely ignorant of the basics of biology. 2. You certainly have poor reading comprehension skills. What part of "I'm not interested in the big bang because I'm not an astronomer/physicist.", do you not understand?
any good psychologist wouldn't get on a high horse and commit litterary fowlicy, or say "I don't need a response for this comment, I know how people work, i'm a Psychologist."
And isn't there a rule in science that SOMETHING can not come from NOTHING? But the whole big bang theory rests on this, that at somepoint in time there was nothing and then something was there, where did this something come from?
"And isn't there a rule in science that SOMETHING can not come from NOTHING? "
(That argument is more proof you're a creationist.)
Yes, but it only applies to closed systems. If you're actually interested in the big bang then why don't you study it. I'm sure there's 1000s of pages of info on the net.
you're obviously not too polished in your theoretical physics. or you're just an ignorant person who has chosen to engage in a debate with extremley insufficient knowledge. there are thousands of theories put forth to examine the origin of the universe, the big bang just being the most credible.
just like Darwin found in his experiments with pea plants, sometimes they had white flowers and sometimes pink flowers but nevertheless the genes were ALREADY present for either color, did you not study this 'cause you make yourself out to be some kind of expert?
"did you not study this 'cause you make yourself out to be some kind of expert"
-Chuckle- The ignorance and arrogance of you people never fails to amaze. Here's the scoop dumbfuck: Darwin didn't know anything about genes or DNA and he didn't study peas either.
You're correct, Darwin didn't know about genes, at least he didn't know what they were, however he did realize that for some reason pink flowers were dominate sometimes and other times white flowers, so he saw the influence of recessive and dominate genes but just didn't know what was causing the pea plant flowers to be sometimes pink and sometimes white.
Plus.....who said that I am a Christian OR a creationist?? Did I ever say that? All I ever have done is point out the problems with the evolution theory and discuss the real sciene behind mutation. One doesn't have to be religious in order to NOT believe in every theory that is presented.
".who said that I am a Christian OR a creationist?? Did I ever say that?"
No, you didn't have to. Here's the evidence that you're a christian creationist: "All I ever have done is point out the problems with the evolution theory and discuss the real sciene behind mutation."
So let me get this straight, anyone who doesn't believe in the evolution theory, anyone who admits that there are serious flaws and problems in it is a Christian according to you? Wouldn't that be most scientists?? Isn't that why there is constant research being done to try to make sense out of and prove how the theory could be true?
Don't avoid this, answer this point this time...where did the material come from that was involved with the big bang? No, better yet, where was this material at the time of the big bang, in space? Where did space come from? You tell me that only a Christian thinks this is a flaw? Tell me how this isn't a problem?
"where did the material come from that was involved with the big bang? No, better yet, where was this material at the time of the big bang, in space? Where did space come from?"
I don't know. I'm not a physicist, astronomer, or cosmologist. Ask them. Or better yet, do a little research on the web. It's free you know.
" Tell me how this isn't a problem?"
The fact that science doesn't have all the answers re: one phenomena in no way detracts or falsifies others areas of science.
First off, you can believe whatever you want, but think about this FACT....for the big bang theory to work, science MUST ignore it's OWN rule, that being "Something can not come from nothing" Where did the material come from for the big bang to happen, further more, where did the universe come from that this material was within? You see my point? The theory is based on a hypocracy, that's NOT and OPINION, it's a FACT.
Saying that some evidence for evolution could be fake doesnt mean that the content of the bible is true. Some people say that Bush is the missing link. By the way, this video is pretty gay!
hello evolutionist or shud i say HELLO APES!!! this is only i can say: we humans are not ape, if you are ape, I AM NOT!!! we are more intelligents,more advanced and we are all creations of God!!! the world is in its perfect place, the law ..everything!!! Thats why God sent his son Jesus Christ,and that he will explain to us all about the truth but many rejected his truth and continue to live in total confusion up to now!!!read the bible and judge it later.
this video hurts my brain. yes, we can reconstruct soft tissue from skeletal remains. hair is not included in this of course. charles dawson was an idiot and not a good example of modern scientists. scientists are the ones who proved he forged the skull after all. i also love how the narrator states that anthropologists only have found parts of our ancient ancestors, what a lie. this is such a propaganda film, whoever made this film, i hope you have trouble sleeping at night.
If God designed man, then God is a retarded. There are SO many aspects of our designs that either could have been done much better, or make absolutely ZERO sense if viewed from a creationist perspective. You'd figure a "supreme being" would be able to come up with a better design, especially if he was creating us in his own image.
Remember folks creation is theory!! The existence of god is a theory (A very weak theory with no evidence). Biological evolution is a hard fact, you can observe it for yourself if you do the experiment, go to talkorgins and grow a brain! Gravity was a theory now it is a Law. Evolution will be a law very soon! The whole point of science is to be skeptical. Religious people have turned their back on science. Go live in a barn with the Amish people, you don't deserve science and technology.
Have you ever heard of a "figure of speech", I'm impressed you know how to read. Don't you have a suicide to get on with? Muhammad and I love you. Quick, Go kill yourself for Allah!!
And what scientific evidence are you basing this point on? Where is the proof that humans have been evolving for thousands of years. Do you even understand the difference between adaptation and evolution?
Wow, You are so Superstitious. That is great you believe in magic. Just because something is complex does not make it magic though, I must interject. You are "special" like a unicorn. Ride free in your land of mythical untruths. Live the lie because it is yours too. Everybody loves you. You are very special. Cheers to you and your magical Mythical kingdom.
Is that so? What are these lies you speak of. The sad fact is that you are the one who was lied too all these years. They brain washed all of us with this evolution nonsense. It's not science, it's science fiction!
And an invisible father figure who lives in the sky and watches everything that everyone in the world does at all times is the truth? Foolish. Simply, foolish.
ok ok...not even going into the point about the evidence of evolution (which there is tons of)..but more interestingly: What evidence is there of the existence of a so-called god?? NONE.
Gotta love how forgeries are created by evolutionists and disproved by 'experts,' as if the later experts were not evolutionists themselves.
Here's my question to the filmmakers and those that agree with them: if creatures suddenly appear fully formed, why don't you show examples of these sudden appearances from the fossil record?
Is it just me or is it possible that a creator,i am a christian, could have created the universe and set evolution into motion you know possibly, it does make sense.
and ya this is serious islamic propaganda, it is scary when u think of ppl showin this to children, true or not, its still scary
As you say, masaba1, it is conceivable. It is unnecessary as an explanation, but such a view does not really conflict with evolution if the laws are constant and not spurred on by minor miracles. This is philosophy. However when claimed as science it must be backed by evidence, which is lacking.
" I love that christians would be watching this getting all excited untill alah was mentioned. I wish I could have seen their faces."
could have said it better myself, hahaha. but seriously allow the maker of this video at some points seemed to be vaguely backing his theories with some type of evidence but then completely shot everything down with that last couple minutes about allah or wut ever.
Is it just me or is it possible that a creator,i am a christian,
Of course, the drawings in the pamphlets distributed by religeous groups of smartly groomed men and perfect pigtailed girlies playing in a heaven on earth where the lion lies down with lamb are strictly authentic.
The problem is that while this creationist crap seems funny and so riddled with lies and half truths that you'd think it nobody would believe it, a lot of people are making a lot of money with this stuff and are pushing it into schools around the world. In the long run, this is dangerous.
The greatest fraud is Jesus. Read The Christ Conspiracy - The Greatest Story Ever Sold, by Acharaya S.
Historians of the time wrote nothing about the god man Jesus. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all have their roots the mythos of Egypt, Summeria, India and elsewhere. The cross was a pagan symbol for the sun crossing the equinox. There was nothing new in Christianity except original sin, a fabrication to create dependence on the church for salvation.
And no one ever wonders about the popes fish head hat. Or the true history of x-mas. Or the easter bunny, or the word 'Version' on the cover of the bible.
come on , you gotta laught, this is kinda funny :D lol. i guess its not only "evolutionists" who create "FAKE"s even morons can creat a film full of lies.
poor old americans you must get this retarted shit all the time.
How does this have any bearing on the theory of evolution? It is ony saying that artist representations of creatures we KNOW existed are maybe not 100% accurate The whole point is that thgey aren't photographs - they are drawings. Even the people that make them say they are not accurate and factual - they are merely drawings showing what they may have looked like.
eww I feel so dirty after watching that. I wonder where he got his "facts"? The bible? According to wikipedia neanderthals were quite real. Well, as long as creationist are on the attack nobody is looking at how deficient their own "theory" is.
Its called scientific theory. You present a theory. You test it. If its false you start over. The scientists that make these claims are also the scientists that disprove them.
Earnest Hooton, that this video quotes, died in 1954. Not the most up to date information, I would say. Neanderthal dismissed? Look up some current information on the DNA sequencing of Neanderthal and the relationship to modern humans--interesting.
"...and are likely only to mislead the public." Earnest Hooton (1931) It's not 1931. Would you then say the models crime scene investigators or cops recreated from JUST a skull are not good recreations. These people are pros. If you every seen their work, you would probably apologize for saying it's [FAKE] or doesn't have any value.
"creation science", what the..! why do these people need to use the word "science" to explain myth. it's like scientology, it has nothing to do with science and neither does this drival.
Thank you! I had never thought of those facial reconstructions as being artistic in nature. Infact the artist could have designed a human looking face.
[sarcasm galore]Wow, a lot of research obviously went into this amazing rebuttal, which, I'm sure, has evolutionists running for the hills.[/sarcasm galore]
Also: These nine minutes are long on hyperbole and short on veracity - creationists and "intelligent" designers are welcome to consult their dictionaries, since they obviously need all the help they can get. Evolutionary biologists didn't consider Piltdown Man a "missing link," that was simple media hype that Dawson used to line his pocketes. Here's some very simple advice, and you won't have to consult your dictionary to figure this one out: READ!!!!
At 4:20: "Experts who re-examined the fossil in 1949 discovered that it was a forgery that had been produced by attaching an Orangatan's jaw to a human skull." Ummm...those "experts" were evolutionary biologists! And Charles Dawson, the perpetrator of this hoax, may very well have been an "evolutionist," but he was employed by the British government as a solicitor, and considered himself an "amateur archaeologist."
AND, nevermind that the moronic commentator kept equating drawings with claims of evidence! I can't contain myself! This is absolutely the most hysterical video I've ever seen in my life! The great part is that I haven't even viewed a third of it yet! My physical science colleagues are going to piss themselves when they see this! Thanks for the hilarity! Hoot"E"n - great spelling!
Oh this is hilarious!!!! I know I posted my first comment very quickly to the hapless soul who is hopelessly ignorant of that biological, but then I watched further and saw the "quote" by Earnest Hoot"E"n! News flash: Earnest HootOn was an anthropololgist in criminal studies at Harvard EIGHTY YEARS AGO, and was NOT an EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGIST. Care to check your spelling? Much less credentials?
How can you lump evolution with Hollywood movies?? that makes about as little sense as taking the bible literary. That drawings are merely a hypothesis. Explain peeking man fossils found in China. and if all things are made perfect. how do you explain species like the flat fish?
Why can't these so called scientists seem to explain why we lost the hair on our bodies if we came from apes? Not having any hair, i would think would be a major disadvantage, and not something nature would do as a form of evolution.
We lost the hair from our bodies because we killed animals and wore their skins to stay warm. (ice age weather) we did'nt need to grow adaptations. we could make tools from other animals and from the environment to survive the rapid climate change. gaining knowledge and warmth from other animals. humans selected less aggressive partners and domesticated themselves into becoming the humans we see and are today. some of us are still pretty hairy, you have to admit that!
Doing the right thing does not require faith in a god or other supernatural force. To believe in a particular god or religion may lead one to then hold beliefs that doing the right things as stated in their doctrines are the best or only way to be fully realized with regards to worth or self worth. There are better natural ways of explaining why it is that we need to be good that do not presuppose the existence of a god or in the supernatural.
Love the "accurate" quote from 1913...how useless is that? Evolution holds much more evidence than these weirdos are willing to admit - and that is say.
"Half man, half ape creatures....baseless evolution.."
It is to laugh; although the video is correct that drawings of our ancestors are not necessarily accurate...so what! Men ARE apes; the molecular evidence is undeniable- unless you're afraid to look through a microscope.
IF i ate breakfast this morning i would have shit my pants b/c i lost control of all my muscles. this is a delibarate act of lunacy that no one should see.
"...imposed on the public by imaginary drawings."? Well, maybe, just like religious literature has drawings of events when humans didn't exist and portraits of people with Saturn rings around their heads, etc., etc., but we're supposed to believe THAT. Of course, makes perfect sense. ;)
Hahaha, I love how this video keeps putting "fake, fake fake" in flashing red letters next to archaelogical finds. It's to the effect of "oh quick, our sheep might think for themselves- warn them quickly" xD
This is, by far, the stupidest video I have ever seen. It has no footing in scientific reality or even common sence. Anyone that thinks this is anything less than a joke is in need of serious h
So, where did the first organism come from that evolved into us typing here on the internet?
Let me guess....it CREATED ITSELF lol Well gee that's really something I'll put my faith in.
oceantracks 1 year ago
rofl, its just the other way around, this could be a satire, but i fear they mean it seriously.
Practically all the creationists arguments have been debunked over and over again. But since they tend to lie and hope the public isnt aware that their arguments are fraudulent they still use them. This whole video is one big fat lie and nothing else
MrRichardQED 1 year ago
LOLOL I love how they quote the Harvard dude in 1931
Keenan4life 1 year ago
Don't you fundies ever get tired of this lame crap?
You present an unimaginative diatribe regarding some publications and draw unlikely conclusions with no evidence. It's in no way surprising as you have no evidence to offer but I remain perplexed by your motive. Trust me and the rest of the informed and educated people, it's not convincing anyone of anything except your dogmatic ignorance.
On one point I would concur - you did not evolve, far enough.
agroundhere 1 year ago
reconstruction of facial features from a skull are used in forensics. they are admissible in court. we can determine from the skeletal remains, the age, the gender and race.
alexyguillermoreyes 2 years ago
What a load of horse sh*t. If folks can't see this as propanda, I feel sorry for them.
Besides attacking science, what does this piece of trash offer as an alternative?
Talking snakes?
Morahg 2 years ago
The evolution and fraud of evolutionist... what?
Righty, let me make a video and entitle it "The defense and fraud of Christian".
What is it with the anti-reason crowd's habit of not giving words like "scientist", "atheist" s-endings?
MidgardEagle 2 years ago
This is propaganda.
Almost every illustration regarding evolution clearly states that it's an artist's rendering. It doesn't mean we didn't evolve.
TheWALOS 2 years ago
The fuck?
This is more propaganda than any of those scientific magazine...
ShashiJapan4 2 years ago
Bullshit for uneducated people.
jintiya 3 years ago
Man came from ape... Never...what a joke
farrc 3 years ago 2
Genesis, offers a view of evolution which is more radical than making man a descendant of the ape. It claims that he came from the dust of the ground.
sethecx 3 years ago
The facial features of a living being cannot be determined by it's remains? BAHAHAHA! Fuck man,I guess those forensic artists who use bone remains of unknown murder victims to draw accurate sketches of what the person looked like when alive are all in on the evolution plot to make it seem like such things are possible.
Aaron518 4 years ago 2
lol
what a stupid video
superfisto 4 years ago
All the points made in this video can easily be made to show false.
brazensteel 4 years ago
Like every creationist video on Ewetoob, it showcases the woefull and willfull ignorance of the proponents of this gobbledegook on the basic tenents of evolutionary theory. The fervor and volume with which an individual attempts to dismiss or discredit evolutionary theory is always inversely proportionate to that individuals understanding of it. Pure, unadulterated bullshit.
Leatherup 4 years ago
Damn, I would like to see the face of a Christian fundie watching this, nodding in approval the whole way through, then coming to the concluding "that divine creator is Allah"....that must be priceless. Hah!
DogBoots77 4 years ago
I'd pay to see that!
VidBint 4 years ago
how? allah in arabic means god, so why is it priceless? is it that you didnt know that?
dias1777777 4 years ago
It's priceless because even though it's still the abrahamic god, it implies that there are grave differences between their beliefs about creation. All of them wrong, ofcourse, but that's a different story.
DogBoots77 4 years ago
So evolution, with it's known, historically verifiable author (Darwin NOT classical Greece or Sumerian) is "myth". Who then, was author of the old testament? his or her provenance? explain. (mind you, all this creationist shit is for Americans, with their awful, backward education system)
plhanc 4 years ago
Like so many things religious people try to feed you, this video is full of half truths. It uses cherry picked facts for persuasion. Religion breeds terrorism.
Oddnoggins 4 years ago
lol this vid is a joke only a fuck tard would believe this religious propaganda. lol
conkertheevilsquirre 4 years ago
the theroy doesn't rest on "something from nothing" it rests on the idea that a singularity existed for eternity, because time didn't exist and then collapsed into itselfthus creating the universe, and a new dimension.
BrandNameChapstick 4 years ago
along with that, many scientific theories that have nothing to do with evolution or any other hot-button issue of the sort have been introduced, and then disproven some time in the future.
BrandNameChapstick 4 years ago
in my mind, propiganda is statements through media and other influential mediums that convey one opinion with little room for the adaptaion of other's thoughts. this video does exactly that. is it possible that there is a higher power? with all the new things we're finding in science these days that we thought to be impossible in previous times, it'd be ignorant to completely shut out the idea. if ther is, we weon't know for another good 1000 years.
BrandNameChapstick 4 years ago
yes, our only evidence may be skull fragments and tibia. but we also have carbon dating, knowledge of the environment at that time, which can help us reconstruct possible facial features. multiple faces to one skull isn't an attept to prove anything, it's called trial and error.
BrandNameChapstick 4 years ago
There are a lot of misunderstanding of what Darwin actually was trying to say. He was saying that he observed that dominate traits would emerge in offspring, this is true, but that doesn't make for new species.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
You do not have to be religious in order to also not believe in evolution. Evolution proposes that species of animals evolved into NEW and DIFFERENT species, this is another problem with the theory because modern SCIENCE, not religion says that this is impossible. Species can only adapt to live in different conditions and the fittest survive passing on the dominate genes, but not turning into an entirely new species, just another hyocracy that any non-religious person can easily see.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
Incorrect. The mechanism of Natural Selection results in the formation of new species as a gradual, cumulative consequence of beneficial mutation. Pray tell, what scientific discipline states that animals do not evolve into new and different species-given sufficient time of course.
discipleofkitsch 4 years ago
NO amount of time creates a new species, and there is no such thing as "beneficial mutation" real life is not an x-man movie, mutations are always screw-ups actually. Genes don't magically turn into a different species dude, no amount of time can change this fact.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
The evolution theory and the big bang theory propose that species can evolve into new species because it is just that, a THEORY, they need some way to explain things that they don't understand, however modern science has proven that really species can not turn into new species through mutation or time.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
'however modern science has proven that really species can not turn into new species through mutation or time.'
No it hasn't.
sSereth 4 years ago
Research mutation and look for records of any BENEFICIAL mutations. You won't find any. What is your definition of science by the way 'cause different people have different definitions. A theory is just a set of ideas but can never be proven because you need to develope a testable hypothesis to see if you get reliable results, the same results need to be abtained over and over to make something proven, that's what science is to me and the real scientific world.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
Evolution does not have to be beneficial.
The idea that people can have different definitions for science doesn't make it right. There is a SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
Your lack of understading of science is appalling.
Look up 'scientific theory evolution' and click on the third link from the top (should be 'talkorgins')
sSereth 4 years ago
On google, I mean.
sSereth 4 years ago
Did I say "beneficial EVOLUTION"?? I think I said "beneficial MUTATION" because that was the argument being made by you or someone else here earlier. And you avoided my challenge to find examples of it too, there simply aren't any, and you or someone else here said that evolution involved benificial mutation, so what do you think?
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
Mylan, seriously now...there are HUNDREDS OF SCIENTIFICALLY STUDIED AND DOCUMENTED EXAMPLES OF BENEFICIAL MUTATION. Period. Do some research. Google some medical research sites for a start. It's easy.
discipleofkitsch 4 years ago
There's an old saying, it says something along the lines of no point in arguing with a fool. I've done my research believe me, you are thinking that I'm closed minded maybe? I'm more open minded then you know, I'm open minded enough to see that evolution is only a theory, and we both know that theories can't ever be proven right? As far as menificial mutation goes....well I've never found any examples of mutation that actually are beneficial.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
"....well I've never found any examples of mutation that actually are beneficial."
It's because you never looked. Search on "beneficial mutations".
You creationists are a blight on the earth.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
All the examples I've beneficial mutation I've researched are not mutation at all but rather only the survival of the fitest, the classic example of moths changing colors during the industrial revolution was not mutation, only survival of the fitest.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
Ahhh...but what creates differences that may lead to changes in reproduction potential...ie survival of the fittest? That would be, among others, mutation. See the connection! If moths were all white, the single moth with a grey mutation would have a greater chance of more descendents.
discipleofkitsch 4 years ago
Ohhh, I now see your definition of mutation, ok then, there are lots of examples of this. You call it mutation, I don't, then we are on the same page, it doesn't matter what it's called just what's actually happening in the process. You say the grey moth had a mutation to become grey in the first place, well the research says that the grey moth was ALREADY around, so it didn't mutate from anything.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
You see Darwin talked about the survival of the fittest and the most dominate genes and most fitting genes for the enviroment survive and reproduce, however he said that those genes and dna where already there but sometimes just recessive so we don't see them, like the grey moth, and Darwins classic example with white and pink flower on pea plants.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
Darwin didn't say anything about DNA.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
"Research mutation and look for records of any BENEFICIAL mutations. You won't find any. "
What a complete fucking lie. Your lies represent you as a poor example of a Christian.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
Did u not read what I just finished writting?
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
Come on, tell us about Darwin and how he discovered Mendellian genetics by studying peas.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
How's this for a problem with the evolutionary theory.....where did the material come from that was involved with the big bang? No, better yet, where was this material at the time of the big bang, in space? Where did space come from? You tell me that only a Christian thinks this is a flaw? Tell me how this isn't a problem?
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
"How's this for a problem with the evolutionary theory.....where did the material come from that was involved with the big bang?"
It's no problem at all. Evolutionary theory isn't concerned with the origins of the universe, or even the advent of life. Evolution deals strictly with change.
Yep, you're a fundie all right. So now you're going to lie about being Christian?
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
I guess you havn't heard of a thing called Philosophy have you? Talking about the issues from all angles, open minded without denial. I don't understand you dude, you say you believe in the evolution theory but aren't conserned about the orgins of the earth? If you are going to use science to explain how species have developed don't you need something from science to explain where the material came from to start the process of evolution?
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
"I guess you havn't heard of a thing called Philosophy have you? "
I guess you've never heard of something called "facts". You haven't demonstrated any knowledge of them thus far.
" don't understand you dude, you say you believe in the evolution theory but aren't conserned about the orgins of the earth? "
Who said I wasn't concerned with it? I just don't study it. It's called abiogenesis and it's not my area of expertise.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
What are your thoughts on the big bang? Do you believe it? Or do you have some other ideas about the process of life and our planet before the time line that the evolution theory covers?
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
The details and mechanics of the big bang doesn't interest me much. Let the physicists worry about that.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
I find it strange that you aren't interested in it. It seems foolish to me to believe so strongly in science and evolution and not even be interested in all the other necessary steps just to get to a point where there is something to evolove.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
As I've said, the vagaries of the origins of the universe really have no impact on evolutionary theory. None, zip, zero, zilch.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
None? That's based on an assumption isn't it? The assumption that science can acctually explain the orgins of this world. What if it can't?
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
"That's based on an assumption isn't it?"
No it's not. The world is here and it is observable. How it got here is inconsequential to evolutionary theory.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
Well consider that there was a creator, a creator who made things the way they are, without evolution. Is it impossible that there is a higher power? Why is it impossible?
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
"Well consider that there was a creator, ... who made things the way they are, without evolution."
See, I knew you were a creationist. There may or may not be a creator. Regardless, it is outside of the realm of science since it can't be scientifically tested. Science validated evolutionary theory decades ago, and adds more evidence every day.
"Is it impossible that there is a higher power?"
No.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
Let's forget the evolutionary theory for a moment, let's talk about orgins....correct me if i'm wrong, the only theory that science has towards the orgins of our universe is the big bang correct?
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
"Let's forget the evolutionary theory for a moment, let's talk about orgins...."
I've already told you that origins doesn't really interest me. As such, I'm not interested in talking about it.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
Very common answer for someone who is either a fool or in denial and doesn't want to face the tough facts that threaten his beliefs isn't it? I don't need a response for this comment, I know how people work, i'm a Psychologist.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
For an alleged psychologist, two things stand out. 1. You are entirely ignorant of the basics of biology. 2. You certainly have poor reading comprehension skills. What part of "I'm not interested in the big bang because I'm not an astronomer/physicist.", do you not understand?
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
I'll pray for you.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
You should really be praying for yourself for lying earlier about being a Christian.
Tell us, what's it like to be walking around with your ass between your ears?
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
"Knowledge CAN be power, but knowledge leads to arrogence, and arrogence to ignorance, let's never forget that knowledge is not wisdom."
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
At first glance I thought you were speaking rubbish. But this very primary perception I had contradicted my view. Perfect Point MylanKlassen, I agree
Catz007 4 years ago
any good psychologist wouldn't get on a high horse and commit litterary fowlicy, or say "I don't need a response for this comment, I know how people work, i'm a Psychologist."
BrandNameChapstick 4 years ago
"Knowledge CAN be power, but knowledge leads to arrogence, and arrogence to ignorance, let's never forget that knowledge is not wisdom."
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
And isn't there a rule in science that SOMETHING can not come from NOTHING? But the whole big bang theory rests on this, that at somepoint in time there was nothing and then something was there, where did this something come from?
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
"And isn't there a rule in science that SOMETHING can not come from NOTHING? "
(That argument is more proof you're a creationist.)
Yes, but it only applies to closed systems. If you're actually interested in the big bang then why don't you study it. I'm sure there's 1000s of pages of info on the net.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
you're obviously not too polished in your theoretical physics. or you're just an ignorant person who has chosen to engage in a debate with extremley insufficient knowledge. there are thousands of theories put forth to examine the origin of the universe, the big bang just being the most credible.
BrandNameChapstick 4 years ago
just like Darwin found in his experiments with pea plants, sometimes they had white flowers and sometimes pink flowers but nevertheless the genes were ALREADY present for either color, did you not study this 'cause you make yourself out to be some kind of expert?
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
"did you not study this 'cause you make yourself out to be some kind of expert"
-Chuckle- The ignorance and arrogance of you people never fails to amaze. Here's the scoop dumbfuck: Darwin didn't know anything about genes or DNA and he didn't study peas either.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
You're correct, Darwin didn't know about genes, at least he didn't know what they were, however he did realize that for some reason pink flowers were dominate sometimes and other times white flowers, so he saw the influence of recessive and dominate genes but just didn't know what was causing the pea plant flowers to be sometimes pink and sometimes white.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
You fucking moron, Darwin DIDN'T do genetics experiments with peas.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
Plus.....who said that I am a Christian OR a creationist?? Did I ever say that? All I ever have done is point out the problems with the evolution theory and discuss the real sciene behind mutation. One doesn't have to be religious in order to NOT believe in every theory that is presented.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
".who said that I am a Christian OR a creationist?? Did I ever say that?"
No, you didn't have to. Here's the evidence that you're a christian creationist: "All I ever have done is point out the problems with the evolution theory and discuss the real sciene behind mutation."
You miserable wretches all tell the same lies.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
So let me get this straight, anyone who doesn't believe in the evolution theory, anyone who admits that there are serious flaws and problems in it is a Christian according to you? Wouldn't that be most scientists?? Isn't that why there is constant research being done to try to make sense out of and prove how the theory could be true?
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
"in the evolution theory, anyone who admits that there are serious flaws and problems in it is a Christian"
Nope, I'm sure there's plenty of fundamentalist muslims who don't understand evolutionary theory either.
It's just that the crap you're spewing forth is typical of the fundie creationist websites.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
Don't avoid this, answer this point this time...where did the material come from that was involved with the big bang? No, better yet, where was this material at the time of the big bang, in space? Where did space come from? You tell me that only a Christian thinks this is a flaw? Tell me how this isn't a problem?
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
"where did the material come from that was involved with the big bang? No, better yet, where was this material at the time of the big bang, in space? Where did space come from?"
I don't know. I'm not a physicist, astronomer, or cosmologist. Ask them. Or better yet, do a little research on the web. It's free you know.
" Tell me how this isn't a problem?"
The fact that science doesn't have all the answers re: one phenomena in no way detracts or falsifies others areas of science.
kkkssskkkssskkksss 4 years ago
First off, you can believe whatever you want, but think about this FACT....for the big bang theory to work, science MUST ignore it's OWN rule, that being "Something can not come from nothing" Where did the material come from for the big bang to happen, further more, where did the universe come from that this material was within? You see my point? The theory is based on a hypocracy, that's NOT and OPINION, it's a FACT.
MylanKlassen 4 years ago
That was pretty fucking funny.
Larsixo 4 years ago
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAH Fucking religious dicks don't know what the hell they're talking about.
EVOLUTION IS FACT
Two Types
"MICRO" And "MACRO"
MICRO = 100000% FACT
MACRO = 98% FACT.
dirtydeedz161 4 years ago
At 3:19 he is quoting a theist from 1931 that's refuting religion! xD
This means nothing.
lazerflesh 4 years ago
You all sound like a bunch of assholes. Nice video.
groovejamma 4 years ago
and your opinion matters because???
mistapiccolo 4 years ago
Saying that some evidence for evolution could be fake doesnt mean that the content of the bible is true. Some people say that Bush is the missing link. By the way, this video is pretty gay!
RagnarRedbeard18 4 years ago
i notice the video is 9.11 long and its muslim based is that a coincedence
antcowan 4 years ago
"These misleading drawings are introduced in a particular sequence". How ironic...
thobern 4 years ago
god is a wank
budandaspliff 4 years ago
hello evolutionist or shud i say HELLO APES!!! this is only i can say: we humans are not ape, if you are ape, I AM NOT!!! we are more intelligents,more advanced and we are all creations of God!!! the world is in its perfect place, the law ..everything!!! Thats why God sent his son Jesus Christ,and that he will explain to us all about the truth but many rejected his truth and continue to live in total confusion up to now!!!read the bible and judge it later.
GuessedWho 4 years ago
If you prefer to believe in magic instead of facts... that shows how intelligents we shud deem you.
blackwolf1272 4 years ago
this video hurts my brain. yes, we can reconstruct soft tissue from skeletal remains. hair is not included in this of course. charles dawson was an idiot and not a good example of modern scientists. scientists are the ones who proved he forged the skull after all. i also love how the narrator states that anthropologists only have found parts of our ancient ancestors, what a lie. this is such a propaganda film, whoever made this film, i hope you have trouble sleeping at night.
fireandashes36 4 years ago
Man is created in gods image. God must be a complete shit. I'm, not worshiping no shit.
emphaticapathy 4 years ago
If God designed man, then God is a retarded. There are SO many aspects of our designs that either could have been done much better, or make absolutely ZERO sense if viewed from a creationist perspective. You'd figure a "supreme being" would be able to come up with a better design, especially if he was creating us in his own image.
c6gunner 4 years ago
"The only evidence at hand is generally a few skul fragments or a tibia..."
LOL. This guy is the one fabricating evidence, not the scientist community.
MeMeMeFirst1 4 years ago
hjbpnb said-"Remember folks, Evolution is a THEORY.
With all the knowledge Human Kind has accumulated
so far, it still has not been proven."
Wrong! It is proven and not disputed by almost anyone who actually studies biology (and further strengthened by geology,botany and cosmology).
discipleofkitsch 4 years ago
do they show this in the elementary schools in Utah!!!
cptmo007 4 years ago
Remember folks creation is theory!! The existence of god is a theory (A very weak theory with no evidence). Biological evolution is a hard fact, you can observe it for yourself if you do the experiment, go to talkorgins and grow a brain! Gravity was a theory now it is a Law. Evolution will be a law very soon! The whole point of science is to be skeptical. Religious people have turned their back on science. Go live in a barn with the Amish people, you don't deserve science and technology.
zoraxq 4 years ago
zoraxq, one cannot grow a brain. they would have to ask allah for a brain : )))
princesszin 4 years ago
Have you ever heard of a "figure of speech", I'm impressed you know how to read. Don't you have a suicide to get on with? Muhammad and I love you. Quick, Go kill yourself for Allah!!
zoraxq 4 years ago
And what scientific evidence are you basing this point on? Where is the proof that humans have been evolving for thousands of years. Do you even understand the difference between adaptation and evolution?
bwaynepain12 4 years ago
Your posting exposes your ignorance...
hjbpnb 4 years ago
Remember folks, Evolution is a THEORY.
With all the knowledge Human Kind has accumulated
so far, it still has not been proven.
I think it will never be because it is based in
a false suposition...
Design is EVERYWHERE, so there has to be a 'Designer'.
It's a LOGICAL conclusion.
C-ya ...
hjbpnb 4 years ago
"Design is EVERYWHERE" you don't say
princesszin 4 years ago
Wow, You are so Superstitious. That is great you believe in magic. Just because something is complex does not make it magic though, I must interject. You are "special" like a unicorn. Ride free in your land of mythical untruths. Live the lie because it is yours too. Everybody loves you. You are very special. Cheers to you and your magical Mythical kingdom.
zoraxq 4 years ago
this video is full of lies.
gabrielg01 4 years ago
Is that so? What are these lies you speak of. The sad fact is that you are the one who was lied too all these years. They brain washed all of us with this evolution nonsense. It's not science, it's science fiction!
bwaynepain12 4 years ago
And an invisible father figure who lives in the sky and watches everything that everyone in the world does at all times is the truth? Foolish. Simply, foolish.
lcoop76 4 years ago
This is one of the best videos I have seen on YouTube yet. 5 stars.
laith88 4 years ago
Hey Youtube. Where is the comment I made 8 hours ago. You suck.
cfh66669 4 years ago
lol, "he is allah"... i wasn't expecting that
laguna117 4 years ago
haha that was funny
hocobo 4 years ago
ok ok...not even going into the point about the evidence of evolution (which there is tons of)..but more interestingly: What evidence is there of the existence of a so-called god?? NONE.
futsala 4 years ago
Gotta love how forgeries are created by evolutionists and disproved by 'experts,' as if the later experts were not evolutionists themselves.
Here's my question to the filmmakers and those that agree with them: if creatures suddenly appear fully formed, why don't you show examples of these sudden appearances from the fossil record?
msmit118 4 years ago
All the evidence and claims made in this video are of events that happen before 1950...Am I the only one who noticed this ?
flameboysk8 4 years ago
Is it just me or is it possible that a creator,i am a christian, could have created the universe and set evolution into motion you know possibly, it does make sense.
and ya this is serious islamic propaganda, it is scary when u think of ppl showin this to children, true or not, its still scary
masaba1 4 years ago
As you say, masaba1, it is conceivable. It is unnecessary as an explanation, but such a view does not really conflict with evolution if the laws are constant and not spurred on by minor miracles. This is philosophy. However when claimed as science it must be backed by evidence, which is lacking.
msmit118 4 years ago
Sure, but then you must conceed that is is just as likley that the toothfairy designed evolution as a way for people to understand the world.
lcoop76 4 years ago
" I love that christians would be watching this getting all excited untill alah was mentioned. I wish I could have seen their faces."
could have said it better myself, hahaha. but seriously allow the maker of this video at some points seemed to be vaguely backing his theories with some type of evidence but then completely shot everything down with that last couple minutes about allah or wut ever.
Is it just me or is it possible that a creator,i am a christian,
masaba1 4 years ago
Scary. This is not Satire. This video is an Islamic religious propaganda flick fed to children by religious zealots. Scary.
Shakeepuddn 4 years ago
"all there's left is a few skull fragments"
And tons of DNA evidence.
"evolutionists base all their evidence on imaginary ideas"
That's creationism in a nutshell.
junithorn 4 years ago
I love that christians would be watching this getting all excited untill alah was mentioned. I wish I could have seen their faces.
skepticomofo 4 years ago
Believe it or not, cameras were not invented by neanderthal man... You people really do have the intellect of sheep. Pathetic.
PeteUtonic 4 years ago
Of course, the drawings in the pamphlets distributed by religeous groups of smartly groomed men and perfect pigtailed girlies playing in a heaven on earth where the lion lies down with lamb are strictly authentic.
SAHBfan 4 years ago
read a book besides the bible or koran, you moron
petephuduh 4 years ago
some species do just suddenly appear in evolutionary thepry, but this video doesn't have much substantive evidence in it...
Outsider451 4 years ago
i wasted 9 min of my life watching this garbage and i'll never get it back.
RonnieB 4 years ago
The problem is that while this creationist crap seems funny and so riddled with lies and half truths that you'd think it nobody would believe it, a lot of people are making a lot of money with this stuff and are pushing it into schools around the world. In the long run, this is dangerous.
Myrkky100 4 years ago
I was taking this seriuosly until I heard the punchline at 7:10
4kinL 4 years ago
The greatest fraud is Jesus. Read The Christ Conspiracy - The Greatest Story Ever Sold, by Acharaya S.
Historians of the time wrote nothing about the god man Jesus. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all have their roots the mythos of Egypt, Summeria, India and elsewhere. The cross was a pagan symbol for the sun crossing the equinox. There was nothing new in Christianity except original sin, a fabrication to create dependence on the church for salvation.
norme2 4 years ago
And no one ever wonders about the popes fish head hat. Or the true history of x-mas. Or the easter bunny, or the word 'Version' on the cover of the bible.
anarchyclayman 4 years ago
Which has been proven untrue more times than i can count. And i'm not even Christian.
Ameer18 4 years ago
come on , you gotta laught, this is kinda funny :D lol. i guess its not only "evolutionists" who create "FAKE"s even morons can creat a film full of lies.
poor old americans you must get this retarted shit all the time.
glennsss 4 years ago
we do :(
HeadshotmasterNeo 4 years ago
How does this have any bearing on the theory of evolution? It is ony saying that artist representations of creatures we KNOW existed are maybe not 100% accurate The whole point is that thgey aren't photographs - they are drawings. Even the people that make them say they are not accurate and factual - they are merely drawings showing what they may have looked like.
StephenHeaton 4 years ago
eww I feel so dirty after watching that. I wonder where he got his "facts"? The bible? According to wikipedia neanderthals were quite real. Well, as long as creationist are on the attack nobody is looking at how deficient their own "theory" is.
stovedale 4 years ago
Yeah Time magazine is a scientific journal.
Its called scientific theory. You present a theory. You test it. If its false you start over. The scientists that make these claims are also the scientists that disprove them.
cfh66669 4 years ago
Earnest Hooton, that this video quotes, died in 1954. Not the most up to date information, I would say. Neanderthal dismissed? Look up some current information on the DNA sequencing of Neanderthal and the relationship to modern humans--interesting.
pmarie2003 4 years ago
Looks like muzzies are joining hands with xtian fundies to undermine science. Barbarians...
andysterdam 4 years ago
Wow... this was pathetic.
rkzenrage 4 years ago
Wow, that was bad.
erchdvd 4 years ago
"...and are likely only to mislead the public." Earnest Hooton (1931) It's not 1931. Would you then say the models crime scene investigators or cops recreated from JUST a skull are not good recreations. These people are pros. If you every seen their work, you would probably apologize for saying it's [FAKE] or doesn't have any value.
juliot37 4 years ago
Der Sieg des Glaubens
mcaroy68 4 years ago
Denial is never pretty.
imbok 4 years ago
"creation science", what the..! why do these people need to use the word "science" to explain myth. it's like scientology, it has nothing to do with science and neither does this drival.
isaishkai 4 years ago
Thank you! I had never thought of those facial reconstructions as being artistic in nature. Infact the artist could have designed a human looking face.
magicalpot 4 years ago
"creation science" is so dumb it shouldn't even be discussed
GodLessRant 4 years ago
I figured this was Christian propaganda at first. I was really suprised to see it was Islamic. Oh well... Same stupidity different name.
drinsaino 4 years ago
1. "Evolutionists" are not a singular group of people. You might as well start bashing on the "gravitationists", or what about the "round earthists"?
2. Evolution is under criticism like all other theories, it's changed all the time to make it reflect our world better, it's called progress.
calamariaxo 4 years ago
3. We are far from perfect, in fact there are defects in cells which we could improve ourselves. Why didn't God?
4. Some are reconstructed from bone fragments, yes, but most are based on whole bodies/skulls or hundreds of bones.
Uck, why do I bother. Xians are about as skeptic as a slab of granite.
calamariaxo 4 years ago
[sarcasm galore]Wow, a lot of research obviously went into this amazing rebuttal, which, I'm sure, has evolutionists running for the hills.[/sarcasm galore]
Chiggs 4 years ago
Also: These nine minutes are long on hyperbole and short on veracity - creationists and "intelligent" designers are welcome to consult their dictionaries, since they obviously need all the help they can get. Evolutionary biologists didn't consider Piltdown Man a "missing link," that was simple media hype that Dawson used to line his pocketes. Here's some very simple advice, and you won't have to consult your dictionary to figure this one out: READ!!!!
Paleobibliomaniac 4 years ago
At 4:20: "Experts who re-examined the fossil in 1949 discovered that it was a forgery that had been produced by attaching an Orangatan's jaw to a human skull." Ummm...those "experts" were evolutionary biologists! And Charles Dawson, the perpetrator of this hoax, may very well have been an "evolutionist," but he was employed by the British government as a solicitor, and considered himself an "amateur archaeologist."
Paleobibliomaniac 4 years ago
AND, nevermind that the moronic commentator kept equating drawings with claims of evidence! I can't contain myself! This is absolutely the most hysterical video I've ever seen in my life! The great part is that I haven't even viewed a third of it yet! My physical science colleagues are going to piss themselves when they see this! Thanks for the hilarity! Hoot"E"n - great spelling!
WellConditioned 4 years ago
Oh this is hilarious!!!! I know I posted my first comment very quickly to the hapless soul who is hopelessly ignorant of that biological, but then I watched further and saw the "quote" by Earnest Hoot"E"n! News flash: Earnest HootOn was an anthropololgist in criminal studies at Harvard EIGHTY YEARS AGO, and was NOT an EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGIST. Care to check your spelling? Much less credentials?
WellConditioned 4 years ago
How can you lump evolution with Hollywood movies?? that makes about as little sense as taking the bible literary. That drawings are merely a hypothesis. Explain peeking man fossils found in China. and if all things are made perfect. how do you explain species like the flat fish?
GOD is the ultimate creation of MAN!
MijRazok 4 years ago
Why can't these so called scientists seem to explain why we lost the hair on our bodies if we came from apes? Not having any hair, i would think would be a major disadvantage, and not something nature would do as a form of evolution.
The13thImam 4 years ago
We lost the hair from our bodies because we killed animals and wore their skins to stay warm. (ice age weather) we did'nt need to grow adaptations. we could make tools from other animals and from the environment to survive the rapid climate change. gaining knowledge and warmth from other animals. humans selected less aggressive partners and domesticated themselves into becoming the humans we see and are today. some of us are still pretty hairy, you have to admit that!
necrozoophiliac 4 years ago
WOW! I guess ignorance is bliss with you, isn't it? Humans ARE apes, we did NOT descend from them! Have you ever heard of DNA?
WellConditioned 4 years ago
Doing the right thing does not require faith in a god or other supernatural force. To believe in a particular god or religion may lead one to then hold beliefs that doing the right things as stated in their doctrines are the best or only way to be fully realized with regards to worth or self worth. There are better natural ways of explaining why it is that we need to be good that do not presuppose the existence of a god or in the supernatural.
JohnHasSeriousQ 4 years ago
I can see tonnes of evidence for evolution in fossils and in species alive today. However there is no evidence for existence of any god whatsoever.
Richard482 4 years ago
haha awesome.
jaysonball 5 years ago
Love the "accurate" quote from 1913...how useless is that? Evolution holds much more evidence than these weirdos are willing to admit - and that is say.
ellevertigo 5 years ago
"Half man, half ape creatures....baseless evolution.."
It is to laugh; although the video is correct that drawings of our ancestors are not necessarily accurate...so what! Men ARE apes; the molecular evidence is undeniable- unless you're afraid to look through a microscope.
discipleofkitsch 5 years ago
IF i ate breakfast this morning i would have shit my pants b/c i lost control of all my muscles. this is a delibarate act of lunacy that no one should see.
MTOTOwaNYAYO 5 years ago
Yes, not as accurate as a white anglo Jesus, and Adam and Eve. LOL
smartz100 5 years ago
"...imposed on the public by imaginary drawings."? Well, maybe, just like religious literature has drawings of events when humans didn't exist and portraits of people with Saturn rings around their heads, etc., etc., but we're supposed to believe THAT. Of course, makes perfect sense. ;)
airste172 5 years ago
Propaganda!
chalkers 5 years ago
How sad is someone if he commissions a diatribe like this, and is apparently happy with the result...
This stuff impresses five-year-olds, they love bad commercials
vitamila 5 years ago
theory of evolution is such BS
BYourself420 5 years ago
Hahaha, I love how this video keeps putting "fake, fake fake" in flashing red letters next to archaelogical finds. It's to the effect of "oh quick, our sheep might think for themselves- warn them quickly" xD
lazerflesh 5 years ago
HAHA! Yeah, I sure am glad they told me that the intro to 2001: A Space Odyssey is fake...
jussts 4 years ago
This is, by far, the stupidest video I have ever seen. It has no footing in scientific reality or even common sence. Anyone that thinks this is anything less than a joke is in need of serious h