The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See Part 8 of 8

[TheJohn090909]

One American consumes 30 times more resources then a 3rd world person. So lodgic would dictate that for every 3rd world person you bring to America you multiply his consumption 30 fold. So the first thing is to stop all immigration! Second thing is to send back all the 3rd world immigrants who by the way have an avarage of 6 children and are multiplying out of control. If we stop breading good honest working tax paying people there will be no one to pay the tax bill for there offspring.

[Black99Fox]

watch zeitgeist moving forward if you liked this.It's alot more modern and 'shiny' then this. Both films hit home hard.

[redressedpreciosa]

Loved this video! It's a shame they took out the part with the questions though. Maybe there were some interesting comments too!

[trumpsahead]

Now it's easier to grasp why the Shadow Govt, Bilderberg Group, or Illuminati/IMF Rothschilds want to exterminate 80-90% of the world's population. "Are they mad", people have been asking for 10 yrs now. Maybe the answer is: they understand Math, and the population is depleting "everything" that's needed for sustainability.

In doing my part, I am offering as sacrifice, for the good of the survivors, the lives of old friends & acquaintances & anyone who does not know what really happened on 9/11.

[cateattingmonster0]

I learned so much today . thank you. I guess I have to appreciate each day. I don't even know how we can survive the future. We all need to understand this problem and have to find way to stop the growth of the population and the consumption of the energy. Or this problem could be a good thing for the nature. running out of oil means no global warming thus less extinction of other species.

[slapleatheru3]

Wow!

[MsChristianPatriat]

The first thing, his premise is off, since we now know oil is not decreasing. It renews itself. We are getting a little smarter all the time. But, one thing is for sure. God is the greatest mathematician and the greatest science expert and the greatest geologist. He knows what he is doing, and when it over, He will end it. In the meantime, we will have to just learn a little more, and pray he gives us wisdom. Get regulations out of the way and we can feed the world.

[jebeah]

@MsChristianPatriat

We also know you are the greatest ass. Keep praying

[philnoll]

Fertility rates are dropping. Preventable deaths are going up. I don't think we have any problem with overpopulation when there's poison in our food and water.

[phillips78]

For more on this issue see "Overconsumpulation-Overpopula­tion is NOT a myth".

[johnken35]

there is no need to worry .god wiill turn our rubbish into microwave dinners our urine into oil,acid rain into budweiser. Isnt that the reason we have been praying so hard.

[dannelito92]

Solution: The Venus Project. Google it

[mormor39]

@dannelito92 The Venus Project has one huge problem - it is non-democratic (how do you get rid of 'the specialists' if they make mistakes.

[dannelito92]

@mormor39 Well there is no fixed number of specialist really, anybody that wants to contribute with an idea can just walk in or walk out, there is no "authority". And you don't "make" desicions, but you arrive at decision based on the facts you have.

[philnoll]

@dannelito92 Living in Jaques Fresco's society, I think people would be asking the question "what ever happened to all the fun in the world?"

[dannelito92]

@philnoll I think people would be asking "what ever happened to all the wars, the hunger, the poverty, the slavery. Is that what you see as "fun" :-P ? People would have a lot more free time to do what they wish, i think there would be a lot more art, more music, more culture, more creativity in the world.

[philnoll]

@dannelito92 And I think that could be a good thing. But Jaques dodges the question of what to do with dissidents by pretending there will be none. Its a very absolute view of the world, something I would consider idealistic but a bit naive.

[bryankage]

What if we universally understood the gravity? What if we were all educated? What good what it do for us to know? The problem will be resolved whether we know and understand or not!!

[kthy0056]

@bryankage

I agree with you. The whole series of videos only say what's wrong, not how it should be right.

I think the premise is this: if we understand the real issues with population growth and lack of energy, we have more power that way to come with tangible solutions.

[bryankage]

@kthy0056

well put

[TCupUK]

I have come back to take a read up on what has been written on this thread. and can only conclude that mankind still lacks the inteligence to resolve these exponetial problems.

We will never over fill the bottle/world because the physical laws will always prevent us, what will inevitable happen is the laws of physics will take depopulation in to its own hands and remove all moral equations from mankind.

Such a world would not resamble this one as it would really be survival of the fittest.

[Sweethands4]

It's all about humanity's addiction to convenience which has been a foundational paradigm of each individual's psyche for the last say, 7000 yrs. How can I make life easier for myself? And what process is the mechanism of convenience???? Technological "progress". In this sentence "progress" should be replaced with "band-aid".

[Laburnus]

Everything the professor said is right under one condition - humanity will not change the sources of energy. Couple of hundred years ago we used animal power(horses) than we jumped to steam engines(coal), then to crude oil, then nuclear power. The sources are changing, whenever we have a lack of energy we change the sources it's very simple. The market demands new resources beacuse the old ones become too expensive. But i have to amdit the the experts were all bullshit.

[Sugardude]

@Laburnus There's not just the energy problem, but the simple population/habitable space problem.

And we can't just rely on science and tech to find a new energy source, what if that doesn't happen?

[Laburnus]

@Sugardude Everybody who thinks that the world is overpopulated should go to wikipedia and see the population density map of the world and see how much space we have left. Human are not bacterias and a lot conditions have to be met so one human could survive whole 70 years.Whe can't reproduce whole life so have that in mind too. Speaking of bacterias they evolve and who knows what disease will kill off the human race... remember the spanish flu??? 25 million dead...

[monkeybp]

@Laburnus I find it very unlikely that we will solve ALL the problems of limited:

energy, habitable land, farmable land, fresh water, rare earth metals, platinum group metals, and yes, CO2 rise (probable global warming, definite ocean acidification),

This isn't all of them, my point is, some of these are starting to become problems today, science doesn't have time to fix them all. Besides most Malthusian disasters averted were done by using another finite resource, this can't happen forever

[drdirs]

@Laburnus The good professor in this video dedicated like half an hour to explaining what's wrong with your way of looking at the problem. Did you not watch it at all? Exactly like the bacteria in the bottle, you're looking up at the vast empty space and thinking, more space than you've ever needed in the past = more space than you'll ever need in the future. You get an F, for facepalm. Watch the video again.

[Laburnus]

@drdirs I advise You to put some simple biology to the supermathematical equation, and You'll see that You're being bullshited by the professor. He's talking too much about the exponential growth which is only partially true in describing any characteristic in populations. As far as I know most characteristics in nature are described by the Gauss function. Ay natural growth reaches it's equilibrium in it's particular conditions. So no fear about overpopulating

[drdirs]

@Laburnus The professor makes half an argument, true. Populations tend to follow logistic growth curves, which is exponential growth with a limiting factor. But, the only two possible limiting factors are premature death and a voluntary reduction in birth rates. Currently the former dominates, because people like to make babies. So we seek ways to reduce premature death - but the professor is absolutely right in saying that those measures only make the problem worse.

[drdirs]

@Laburnus In any real-life situation exp growth always becomes logistic growth, as you say. But that's not a good thing. The curve flattens out ONLY when the death rate equals the birth rate. So which will it be? More death or less birth? It's possible to have neither, but in that case what you have is exponential growth, and as the professor demonstrates, exponential growth cannot be sustained.

[drdirs]

@Laburnus So he's absolutely right in that "we" fail to understand the problem. We THINK we can have perpetual (exponential) growth yet somehow avoid this brutal flattening of the curve. We imagine we can always grow more food, mine more coal, make more babies, and so on. But we'll hit the ceiling soon enough. And the better we are at producing this growth for a while, the more it will hurt when we finally can't keep up anymore.

[Laburnus]

@drdirs You forget about one limiting factor- diseases. If the population growth isn't under natural conditions then soon some microbes will tend to overpopulate. Guess what happens then. But if the curve growth is natural it will soon flatten. It grows because the conditions let it grow. If some places are overpopulated there are two ways: some pandemic or migration to places less populated. The curve will still grow till there no place to go. Look more at the nature.

[drdirs]

@Laburnus I do look at nature. And nature is cruel. Almost any growth in a natural population (animals, bacteria, humans) follows the logistic curve. But you need to consider how population growth is limited by nature. It is not that animals stop reproducing, it's that mortality increases. Take some species of fish that lays 100 eggs during its lifetime. It'll quickly populate a plentiful area, but once that's done, it must either change its own nature, or 99% of all offspring will have to die.

[drdirs]

@Labernus Approaching this maximum capacity of the environment there is a gradual slowdown in net population growth, but that doesn't change what's happening: If the environment supports 10 million fish, then eventually there will be 10 million fish. But after that, every generation will have 990 million offspring that don't succeed, one way or another. That's how nature works, and it's "beautiful" in its own way, but it's immoral to disregard human lives in the same way.

[Laburnus]

@drdirs First about the fish. Most of these 100 eggs are eaten by some other creatures before birth. About 10-30% survive to reproduction age. Not all of them reproduce. Animals have no morality and still "know" when to reproduce( no food, no place, no home etc.) and if they still want to make babies they die with their babies. You don't need morality to stop population growth, it will stop one way or another, morality as You called it is just one of those ways.

[drdirs]

@Laburnus Animals don't stop reproducing just because it's "futile", because it never is. Even when the environmental pressures are at their highest, 1 in a 100 surviving offspring is still an evolutionary edge over no offspring at all. Most animals die young, that's how nature keeps everything in balance. A similar principle WILL apply globally to humans if we keep up with perpetual growth. We should try to avoid it, not admire the beautiful simplicity of it. Because when humans die it's sad.

[drdirs]

.. even if they are the "excess humans" that the Earth can't support. And besides, it's not realistic to expect anyone to be on board with the idea that we should allow humans to die just because we've maxed out the Earth's capacity. At least you'll have trouble finding volunteers.

Of course, one way or another, people will start dying. There will be more wars, more epidemics and more famine. Hugging a tree won't make it better, it just leaves your back exposed to the starving hordes. ;)

[Laburnus]

@drdirs Are You certain about your point? Have ever seen a dog doing a cat? A gay penguin...I have. Do You get my point. You don't need human moral influence into nature to stop certain species to reproduce. Something happens and the growth is slowing down. And it's not sad when humans die. Dying is just part of the deal. So don't tend to panic cause there is nothing to panic about. Conceive 2-4 children to have someone close to care about You when You'll be old. Two will succeed.

[Laburnus]

@drdirs I suggest watching mr George Carlin's "Saving the planet". It's a funny way to understand that some people put to much belief in the power of man. It's hilarious how some people ( usually scientists) think that they can be against nature's laws. As I said before. Look more at nature, how it works and stop to listen strictly to what some rainmakers are trying to tell You.

[TCupUK]

This man has simplified a complexed situation, because of this it lacks the real depth that would be needed to explain the intricacy of the current process we are going through.

[TCupUK]

@TCupUK

This is not about oil. population growth or energy consumption, this explains how mankind is destined to doom due to its lack of intelligence. We think we are intelligent because of are technological advancements, what we do not understand is we do not need any of them, as all we could ever need was provided for us not by us.

[picklesloveslight]

@TCupUK I agree and if it were not for our depending on these sources of energy, we would be growing our own food and hunting, not needing to slave away for others. Working is most often a light term for slavery.

[TCupUK]

@picklesloveslight

I could not have put it better.

[thelifeuwant]

=) nice

[uberminge]

I LIKE TURTLES.....

[Dangerous1966]

ok you goiing like china 1 child per couple, unless your rich in that case you just pay the fine, and if your not rich you get the child taken away from you?. yep just the world i would love to grow up in?

[RocketScientistCarol]

This was interesting. His math is flawless and clearly explained. He encourages his students to learn and think. However, I disagree with his assumption that we have to use oil. Oil was almost unimportant 300 years ago and will be replaced by solar and other sources in the future. There was a time that people used whale oil and perhaps feared that growing populations would run out of whales. I will think about the exponential growth concepts some more. Disturbing.

[itchykami]

The only problem that an increased world population will aid in, is the event of an interstellar war with another world, assuming this war is short term enough that the extra resources we bring to bear does not exhaust our planet before the war's end.

[poosta7]

The "good news" of most christians I know is that we will destroy our world ....and even better, we are in the "last days" so we are very close to the time when god comes from the clouds and saves them (good guys) and tosses everybody not like us them into an eternal lake of fire to suffery for all of eternity......how nice!

Wonder why Dr. Albert Bartlet doesn't address those "facts"?

BTW: It is why I think we are doomed....the 60% of Americans who don't believe in evolution (i.e. SCIENCE).

[rLamaTamu]

i watched all parts and over populations and over consumption of energy per head by first world is definitely the most serious problem but what can be done.

[TheGoalSetter]

You may be good at "very simple math", but what you call educating would actually cause panic. Smart people tend to think that everyone is smart...and moral. They aren't.

The more I learn about overpopulation, the more I appreciate the NWO's willing "to do what is required".

[Pyrela]

In short: We're all screwed. lol

Ah well, nothing lasts forever, right? Enjoy it while it lasts and when the zombie apocalypse occurs good luck to you all(aim for the head)!

[copperscorpion]

he talks about over population being the key. look at china, its hard for a young man to find a wife there due to population

control. Japan also has a problem with not enough young people living there. they give tax rewards for a couple to have children.

[bishopdante]

What will get better with increased population?

parties

[Jotto999]

I think these videos are an excellent demonstration of what happens when you think for yourself. If you do not question what you are told, you will certainly spend your life a slave to misinformation.

It also shows the obvious and startling facts of what is going on in the world of humanity.

Unsustainable resources will inescapably and inevitably lead to failure. Either we become sustainably viable, or we run flat into a wall - and by the looks of these numbers, very quickly.

[linghun]

Besides, it is our large population of today that allows a large proportion of highly specialized professionals to exist and provide us with sophisticated services, tough I agree our population does not need to exceed 10 billion people this century and pop growth should be restricted (which is already happening naturally)

[linghun]

Professor Bartlett is TOTALLY mistaken in his assumption that resources are finite. They are'nt, because the universe in infinite.

[nij7nsky]

I'm afraid, linghun, you have missed the point entirely. We don't have access to the "infinite" resources of the universe; instead, we have to make do with the finite resources of the planet and be careful to tend them carefully for the short time they will last us. The talk was accurate, erudite and salutary.

[zupahzmurv]

@linghun, not even considering the difficulty of inhabiting other planets:

first, the universe is not infite.

second, some of our most important resources, oil, coal, wood etc, are unique to our earth because they organic. It would be almost impossible to find a place else that has those resources.

[polidic]

Very --- even though the earth is 2/3 water only 1% is drinkable and half of that is polluted. It's resources that is stressed. Think about it. If you did that you wouldn't be able to sustain food growth nor would you have the water to grow the food. Wake up...

[sniped101]

people will wake up too late in my opinion.. they always do.. history told us that...

[freed345]

Great series...at 6:10. Yes, banks will get richer since more people will be crowding into communities competing for the same jobs and resources, reducing wages, increasing cost of living, thus having to borrow more money...debt will increase making banks richer on the interest they collect.

[eydos]

Thank you for uploading this series.

[metanym]

Loads of people probably tuned into the first episode thinking it would be about Britney's latest haircut and switched off after about 15 seconds.

[metanym]

"you can take every family in the world and place them on the continent of Australia, gice them a 1/2 acre lot wiht a home on it and still have land left over"

And as long as everyone can grow everything they need on half an acre of scrub land, and nobody wants to have more than two kids, everything will be fine. Why don't you lead the way by, say, ditching YouTube -- there'll be none of that in your outback fantasy...

[joepod]

And I suppose those people will be living in an agrerian society, and be self-sufficient in the Australian desert? Or will they still be using resources?

[whataclutch]

Who let Ashton Kutcher sit in the front row?

[kiratisdale]

lol, ashton kutcher fucking sucks.....but that kid in the vid looks like he wants to stab the old man

[mk2389]

I guess the first thing we could all do is turn off our computers for good.

[marxman00]

Brilliant lecture,very clear, will try to get others to watch, also the docu called "The end of suburbia" is very good. I think lots are awakening.

[vanityfox451]

Hi Marxman00, I admire you for doing your very best to get the underlying information surrounding Dr Albert.A.Bartletts lecture out there for everyone to understand. I recently found a site that is an excellent tool in making all of Bartletts points in clear, factual and laymans terms, that most everyone will understand. Google:-

"Chris Martenson"

and complete the

"Crash Course"

I am stunned into silence on a daily basis that more people aren't aware of this reality...

[1kroc1]

Excellent lecture,,,very scary to have the obvious explain in terms of consequence! That's it settled anyway, it's to late to have kids!

[molagingo]

I watched all 8!!!!!!!!!!

[carign]

Very interesting... I need to buy a land as soon as possible and put stuff aside for long term independance. Food, energy, water... all of those probably have the same arythmetic.

[randomplace]

Things i need: Food, shelter

things i want: comfort :(

[choragudibh]

Now its 0.95.. A small bump on the graph is suppose :)It's a fact.. no one can deny it!

[n00blynah]

Remember that these models are sensitive to initial conditions - the studies in the 50s, 60, 70s are not accurate today. Yes, I know that this just lengthens the span a bit, but what was tech. like 25 years ago? Humans create lots of good and bad in the time span and there is no reason to panic. We do have to act, though: stop having babies, develop sources of oil (yes, we do too have to), and develop non-oil tech.

Did I mention stop with the babies? The emotional & religious pressures must end.

[photosmash]

It WAS 44000 views for part 1/8 and 835 views for part 8/8. This means 1.8% people watched to the end. NOW its 144216 views compared to 1224. This is 0.8% people watching them all (supposedly) Hmmmmm....... (I like math. Even if it's scary.)

[lvecsey]

It took a lifetime to watch all 8 videos. Congrats to all that made it through to be deposited on other side! :)

[vanityfox451]

Hi Photosmash, I know its been 4 months since you watched Dr Albert.A.Bartletts lecture all the way through and put together your own frightening maths on viewing accountabilities, but you made me laugh out loud and shed a tear both and at the same time!

It seems people want to remain oblivious in the majority; it appears 'we' don't.

Google:-

"Chris Martenson"

and complete the

"Crash Course"

I found it an excellent tool for explaining facts to those with a limited concentration span.

[Jbarrtndrsr]

@photosmash Like the Dr said. "the math needs to be reevaluated every time a new discovery exists. Everyone must do their research into alternative energy, zero-point energy and/or free energy in general. If you look hard enough you will find all of the answers not present within this film. combine that with what he has to say and our future will become a lot less bleak.

[Oppsididyouagian]

thanks for putting this up, it was great

[10booth]

44,000 views of part 1. 835 views of part 8.

This speaks volumes.

[liverw0rt]

Haven't you heard? Watching lectures is an elitist thing.

Also, you talk like a fag, and your shit's all retarded.