This is great, thank you so much, I had planned to make this, but you saved me the trouble.
One tiny mistake at the end there though...
Coherent Light (from lasers) is not spherical, but columnar. It is a column or beam.
Sound can be directed that way too, but because of the physical nature of sound (pressure between atoms and molecules), it can never be a coherent beam like EM energy (light, which is intangible...it is compression and expansion of 3D space itself, thats curvature).
Have you studied the works of scientists Viktor Schauberger or T.Townsend Brown relating to gravity? Above the King's chamber there was an area discovered that was filled with insect shells. I think this may be related to Sahuberger's discoveries as well as Viktor Grebennikov. It's possible both fish and insects use this electrogravitic effect and the effect may have been used for some purpose in the King's chamber. The electrostatics you discovered in the king's sarcophagus could be related.
@mistaspot1, this is just common sense...a wave which is propagated from a sound source is going to obviously be spherical, if the wave remains in the same medium (for example, air).
The "wiggly wiggly" is a graphical representation of the compression and rarefaction only...not a visual representation of the wave's visual shape.
Please see my note on Scribd,com called "The Harmonics of Wobbling Spheres".
And see my videos relating to Spherical Harmonics.
This is the only other source I've seen regarding it.
A vibrating string and wobbling ring are two different energies. The equation for a vibrational frequency is T = String Tension, m = String Mass, L = String Length. But the ring of magnetism around a magnet (magnetic line of force) has no tension, has no mass and is a circumference.
@TheRealVerbz What I'm referring to is an Aetheric Oscillation rather than an Acoustic Vibration. When looking at a ring from the side, you get a 2D perspective and the illusion makes it appear as a line waving.
When you take a magnetic viewing film over a magnet, there is the line of force. (Ring)
Angle the magnet and spin it on it's centripetal axis. Then take the magnetic viewing film which acts as an oscilloscope for magnetic waves.
Human vocalization is inherently directional - projected forward.
The sound is loudest in front, quieter toward the sides, and quietest toward the back.
The pressure "waves" still propagate out in all directions, but their equal-intensity profiles now can be visualized as nested marushka-dolls rather than as spheres.
lots of spurious arm-waving going on here... the basic principle is that propagation is isotropic whether it is sound (pressure waves in a medium) or light (i.e. electromagnetic waves), in the absence of interfering conditions the energy will travel equally in all directions and hence, the intensity profile will be "spherical" Generally, there are always conditions that "distort" the "ideal" spherical pattern. The specific example of a human vocalizing is guaranteed to be non-spherical
There are 2 kinds of waves, Longitudinal wave and Transverse Wave. It seems that this guy is using the Transverse wave as a reference not the Longitudinal.
4:39 - That is an example of a longitudinal wave. The shells of the bubbles is the wave itself.
Environmental variables are important to consider, but do not directly relate to the source of the sound
Albeit pressure and vacuums are the underlying structural "framework" that help hold together those sacred geometric patterns of sound but in the end its a result of just the sound itself.
So-under all the visible aspects of this universe, what do you think is at play?
I think john was referring to it's natural original shape being round. Just like the planets in our solar system. Saturns already been documented to reveal the cymatic structure of planets by having manifested the exact geometric patterns that cymatics produce. Picture the graph/sine wave as being the plane, like the plane of our galaxy or solar system , from the micro to the macro , now you know...
something thicker then that which it is travelling in, like a bubble created in air pressing one side against a brick wall will look more like half of a sphere.
Funny isn't it? The more scientists discover about sound, the more weak and ineffectual music becomes, and the more corrupt the symbosis between man and sound. Perhaps they're discovering all the wrong things about sound.
I already knew sound was spherical, but its interesting to hear about the 'tremor' of the outer 'wave'. The cut-away sound bubble was just awesome, and I loved the wave - sphere comparison... It was something that I 'knew' but hadn't realised, at least not so simply.
Thanks for your comment. The evidence for spherical sound is given in the remainder of my lecture which is 3-hours in length. We will post the DVD on SoundHealingResource (see profile for link) in the next few days. It is entitled the True Nature of Sound. I have also written a paper on the same subject which is currently under peer review and will be published later this year in a scientific journal.
This is great, thank you so much, I had planned to make this, but you saved me the trouble.
One tiny mistake at the end there though...
Coherent Light (from lasers) is not spherical, but columnar. It is a column or beam.
Sound can be directed that way too, but because of the physical nature of sound (pressure between atoms and molecules), it can never be a coherent beam like EM energy (light, which is intangible...it is compression and expansion of 3D space itself, thats curvature).
harleyborgais 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mistaspot1 well isn't this logical if you imagine sound? if you clap in the air how else would it propagate than in a circle
DmitriSochlioukov 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
DmitriSochlioukov 3 weeks ago
Awesome
7sevo7 1 month ago
i thought sound was helical in 3 dimensions
thedeed23 1 month ago
i wanna know evrything.,
trineural2012 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is Herts spherical?
trineural2012 1 month ago
is Herts spherical?
trineural2012 1 month ago
what does Hertz mean now then?
trineural2012 1 month ago
Does anyone know what John Stuart Reid's doctorate was in? Was it in acoustics or physics, or is it unrelated by any chance?
ToneSpectra 4 months ago
wiggly wiggly wiggly
Scott5212 4 months ago
Have you studied the works of scientists Viktor Schauberger or T.Townsend Brown relating to gravity? Above the King's chamber there was an area discovered that was filled with insect shells. I think this may be related to Sahuberger's discoveries as well as Viktor Grebennikov. It's possible both fish and insects use this electrogravitic effect and the effect may have been used for some purpose in the King's chamber. The electrostatics you discovered in the king's sarcophagus could be related.
CharlieTHX1138 6 months ago
@mistaspot1, this is just common sense...a wave which is propagated from a sound source is going to obviously be spherical, if the wave remains in the same medium (for example, air).
The "wiggly wiggly" is a graphical representation of the compression and rarefaction only...not a visual representation of the wave's visual shape.
Tripbag 8 months ago
Please see my note on Scribd,com called "The Harmonics of Wobbling Spheres".
And see my videos relating to Spherical Harmonics.
This is the only other source I've seen regarding it.
A vibrating string and wobbling ring are two different energies. The equation for a vibrational frequency is T = String Tension, m = String Mass, L = String Length. But the ring of magnetism around a magnet (magnetic line of force) has no tension, has no mass and is a circumference.
A wobbling equator is different.
TheRealVerbz 9 months ago
@TheRealVerbz What I'm referring to is an Aetheric Oscillation rather than an Acoustic Vibration. When looking at a ring from the side, you get a 2D perspective and the illusion makes it appear as a line waving.
When you take a magnetic viewing film over a magnet, there is the line of force. (Ring)
Angle the magnet and spin it on it's centripetal axis. Then take the magnetic viewing film which acts as an oscilloscope for magnetic waves.
Visualization of Spherical Harmonics
watch?v=frRthRd7sGs
TheRealVerbz 9 months ago
Human vocalization is inherently directional - projected forward.
The sound is loudest in front, quieter toward the sides, and quietest toward the back.
The pressure "waves" still propagate out in all directions, but their equal-intensity profiles now can be visualized as nested marushka-dolls rather than as spheres.
kootzie 9 months ago
Whenever there are conditions which enhance or inhibit the propagation in any direction, the "ideal" spherical shape is "distorted".
Some familiar examples:
drop a pebble on a pond... the ripples are where the pressure waves in the water interact with the non-water (i.e. air) and appear circular
basically the sphere cut in half
down in the water, the pressure waves could be visualized as "Hemi-spherical"
kootzie 9 months ago
kootzie 9 months ago
please cure my cancer with the sound of your voice
nicoepsilon0 11 months ago
@nicoepsilon0 how is your cancer? ck tama-do.com Some cancer patients were cured by their natural sound!
1harmony4u 6 months ago
Physics can prove this i'm sure.
I would love to see the remainder of the lecture. Very understandable.
MrSidMan 1 year ago
@MrSidMan I just ordered the whole "Shape of Sound" lecture on DVD! Looking forward to watching it :)
youarelackluster 5 months ago
why now ? it might be definetly the 3 dimensional shpere and not the 2 dimensional wave
Psykorell 2 years ago
i always thought sound moved in a vortex
not a bubbel
2Dwave=3D vortex
MidnightDC696969 2 years ago
@MidnightDC696969 bubble + vortex spherical toroidal bubble :)
inphiknitfractal 1 month ago
EM waves are also spherical? what does this imply?
vicx05 2 years ago
sound = 3D
=) finally someone not retarded, enough to realise this. <-- is not a typo.
KKinsane2009 2 years ago
There are 2 kinds of waves, Longitudinal wave and Transverse Wave. It seems that this guy is using the Transverse wave as a reference not the Longitudinal.
4:39 - That is an example of a longitudinal wave. The shells of the bubbles is the wave itself.
Kythos 2 years ago
@Kythos So sound IS a wave, a longitudinal wave. maybe he should learn some physics. lol
EzekielSwapp 1 year ago
( Verner Von Braun German Accent here)
Verrrrrryyyy iiinteeerestink...
Paully41 2 years ago
Wiggly wiggly wiggly... haha
Great video though! Thanks!
wwwADAMSPADEcom 2 years ago
jaw dropping thank you
LukaszMrowka 2 years ago
Part 2
Why not use both accurate clocks, in conjunction with their "CymaGlyphs"
to enter a world of "Rhythm Based Communication" (no syntax, no grammar,
no language) where we can now produce both declarative and interrogative
"concepts," & where we now receive non deceptive answers from cetaceans.
Such "Rhythm Based Communication, or RBC," is NOT encoded into "signals,
signs and symbols," but rather is encoded into "Rhythm Based Time, RBT."
drpeterbeamish 3 years ago
Environmental variables are important to consider, but do not directly relate to the source of the sound
Albeit pressure and vacuums are the underlying structural "framework" that help hold together those sacred geometric patterns of sound but in the end its a result of just the sound itself.
So-under all the visible aspects of this universe, what do you think is at play?
SSSnakeStretcher 3 years ago
I think john was referring to it's natural original shape being round. Just like the planets in our solar system. Saturns already been documented to reveal the cymatic structure of planets by having manifested the exact geometric patterns that cymatics produce. Picture the graph/sine wave as being the plane, like the plane of our galaxy or solar system , from the micro to the macro , now you know...
SSSnakeStretcher 3 years ago
What about Plane waves?
sibbald 3 years ago
Sound is not "spherical".
All sound reacts to the environment,
to the time-space context,
making it unique in shape to other sounds.
"Bubble" might be a better description,
if you could imagine a bubble pushing it's
area through different paths,
be it tubes or trees or water.
A bubble having one side pressed towards
something thicker then that which it is travelling in, like a bubble created in air pressing one side against a brick wall will look more like half of a sphere.
yidaki53 4 years ago
Funny isn't it? The more scientists discover about sound, the more weak and ineffectual music becomes, and the more corrupt the symbosis between man and sound. Perhaps they're discovering all the wrong things about sound.
xwsftassell 4 years ago
sound can also be shaped like a tornado, and a torus, and a shattering piece of glass, or a cone... So, this video is dissapointing.
anamoglam 4 years ago
Thank You. It's so nice to learn something I didn't know about sound. :-)
Pantherchick8 4 years ago
I already knew sound was spherical, but its interesting to hear about the 'tremor' of the outer 'wave'. The cut-away sound bubble was just awesome, and I loved the wave - sphere comparison... It was something that I 'knew' but hadn't realised, at least not so simply.
Thanks!
kidXS 4 years ago
Thanks for your comment. The evidence for spherical sound is given in the remainder of my lecture which is 3-hours in length. We will post the DVD on SoundHealingResource (see profile for link) in the next few days. It is entitled the True Nature of Sound. I have also written a paper on the same subject which is currently under peer review and will be published later this year in a scientific journal.
I hope this helps.
John Stuart Reid
soundhealingresource 4 years ago 4