lemme guess, you will either "respond" with nonresponses that dont address what i said, twist my words, ignore me cause you cannot defeat the truth, or delete my comments. but you definately wont actually engage me in discussion which is a win for me by default. stop following the "church of never winning an argument about your beliefs" and start thinking critically.
what religion is that? scientology? you should really read all the stuff i write before you assume im a scientologist, im as anti scientologist as anyone can get. stop giving anon a bad name by not really reading things before you critique them.
everything i said was against scientology. ever hear of sarcasm? yeah that was me making fun of how they think. READ.
so if i have created a religion where the secret high level secrets of it are that we are meant to destroy scientology, but we hold that secret sacred, you cant tell other people about it, or say that it's wrong, cause we hold it as a sacred secret.
you are in fact in the wrong for knowing or wanting to know the sacred secret without our permission. and it is written that anyone who stands against the sacred secret must be treated as badly as possible by all members of my RELIGION (not cult) and if asked about the fact that we think it's ok to treat critics badly we can lie and say we dont believe that, and lying about our sacred beliefs doesnt show disrespect towards those very same beliefs, cause we say so.
hey if scientologists respect my rights to religious freedom, and my right to act as if my beliefs are true, how do you reconcile that my religious beliefs (in part) are that scientology is evil and should be destroyed, when you dont even allow criticism. and if you say you do allow criticism, make a concise distinction between valid criticism and hate mongering, as you would define each of them.
and dont even come at me with the same tired rhetoric about truth, because you are the ones that lie, that's what the nature of the criticism is. people dont make up lies to hate someone or something for no reason. and we have nothing to gain from lying. you need to understand that there are many different religions claiming to be different, whom all have the same core beliefs, just dressed differently. with hierarchal secrets that gradually indoctrinate and make the initiate feel commited.
and all of these groups actually descended from one group. LRH is illuminati. it's funny how the cult of scientology's standards for "proof" of something are drastically different for things that are critical/bad pr for the cult, and things that are positive about it. when it comes to something good about it, one person saying it is definitive proof beyond all doubt, when it comes to something bad about it, video, 1000 witnesses, legal documents, confessions of the accused, ect arent proof. LOLZ
Even I think this video is a little hypocritical; I mean the Church has litigated to get alot of anti-scientology stuff removed from the internet so for anonymous to do it back at us shouldn't be relevant (and I don't know why the Church made reference to that).
An anonymous and decentralised organisation can not meaningfully be considered as a group. There is no admission process, anyone who wants to be a 'member' may act in any way they see fit. It does not make much sense to say that an 'organisation' which is decentralised, anonymous, and not really organised at all is dangerous. Perhaps a more meaningful comment would be that an anonymous, decentralised group, bound only by a common hate and mob mentality is inherently dangerous by its very nature.
Sure Ddos is illegal- Scientology should know, they were among the very FIRST to practice ddos attacks. According to some sources, they may have invented ddos-attack.
I've not lied once, and I have no need to. Can you give me an honest answer, just once? Why is Scientology's version of that video "found on youtube" high-resolution?
After reading the sidebar, hm, I guess running your server off a massive 266mhz PentiumII with no firewalls and a huge 5gig memory just isn't enough to thwart this band of desperados! XD
XD
Apologist scitroll postings smearings are poo-in the-wounds of Co$ butthurtingness (hey if Lron can so can we :D )
oooh millions emails....must have a superpower counter for this shit!.Davey-Davey too much vodka? You pulled this PROPAGANDA right out of your ass! But you know all about that don't you? All those threats were NOT sourced to Anonymous-FBI cleared them sweetie. Go back to the hole you crawled out of to sign off on this. Your ass is waiting for you! What's that I hear?....Kharma is a bitch!........
Outrageous,how can people attack such an innocent,caring church,after all the things they have done to enrich the world.I am simply disgusted,in fact i am simply seething.Life will never be the same.
LOL... this after CO$ attempted to have ALL anti-Scientology videos removed. Not to mention, those bomb threats were found by investigators to have been made by SCIENTOLOGY.... against themselves. What a joke.
Nope dudes.. the video showed me the light.. I am no longer going to participate in Chanology and INSTEAD will seek out a free stress test. I am told everything will make sense afterwards.. Benu 4Life.. Benu for President.. Tom Cruise for GLAD president.
As usual, far be it for Co$ to let facts stand in the way of their blatant propaganda machinery as it chugs along, Asthmatic Dwarf at the helm, dragging its lame body through the cesspools of ignorance and wallowing in in pits of stupidity.
Asthmatic? Sure;y, if he has OT powers, he's immune to such problems, right? And he's a Clear, so he must have perfect recall... so I guess that means he doesn't need a telephone directory. (Either that or he's a lying little poodle.)
Cool, a sequel! Not as hilarious as the original, but still amusing. Do they honestly think this is gonna change anything? Google "dead agenting", btw.
"Sourced to Anonymous"? WTF? Anonymous is not an organization, it's a leaderless collective. So if SOMEONE makes a threatening phone call and doesn't give his name (LOL), he's obviously ANONYMOUS. DUH.
Fail propaganda is fail. Co$ must be getting really desperate.
anonymous is not a real "organization". we are just a lot of people with the will to help members of scientology. we do not harass single persons or members of this cult, we want to fight the people who get RICH by brainwashing others. anonymous will never use physical force. not even agaist the highest leaders. we do respect people that got brainwashed by the methods of scientology. again, anonymous does NOT fight scientology members but the scary, frightening methods they use.
haha FAIL your vids are FAIL remember your FAKE BOMB THREATS? saying anon would some how accumulate 100s of kilos of nitro. -__- shut up no one believes you no one ever will. UFO CULT
I remember Anonymous fake bomb threats (fake because they did not explode)and I remember police coming to evacuate buildings because of Anonymous "for the lulz" action.
if you believe a bunch of kids can come up with hundreds of kilos of nitro then you are beyond reason, not even the military can come up with that amount of nitro un-noticed so dont believe everything you hear, especially if it would be down right idiotic to believe.
so what. someone did a video threatening to detonate 5 kilogram of nitroglycerin. how would you feel receiving such a threat? then google for nitro and you find that there are instructions to make it on the net. would you file a criminal complaint? i would and i understand if the church does.
On the Anonymous Hate Crimes DVD, the quality of the bomb threat video is much greater than the quality as if it were ripped off of youtube. It's quite possible the Church of Scientology manufactured that video in order to discredit Anonymous. This wouldn't be the first time either; Operation Freakout anyone? You are so limited in your tech so much that you have to repeat tactics, OSA. What is this, 1970?
It never crossed your mind that the video codec used might have changed the picture? It is not the quality of the video that is different, the colors are. I heard this spin before but no comprehensible evidence.
When your cult of a Church includes this information in Cease and Desist letters and the video has only been up on YouTube for 2 hours tops, it's certainly evidence. Your Church is scum, OSA. You call everyone who criticizes your church a criminal, and attack the source of the claims rather than the claims. We are not John Sweeney; we are a leaderless organization dedicated to exposing the truth about your Church. Your days of hiding behind the cloak of religion are numbered.
Bullshit. That nitro video was and still is up on several Anonymous websites, asshole. If you have no fucking clue what you are talking about shut up and GTFO.
But it's true; cease and desist letters sent out by attorneys hired by the Church of Scientology brag about how Anonymous sent them a video threatening to blow up churches all over the world. This video was only up for at most two hours, but Scientology still managed to use this clip to try and discredit Anonymous. Just like they've bragged about a bomb threat sent from an internet cafe involving John Sweeney, they repeat this same tactic with this video. You OSA can't think outside the box.
Problem is, there have been dozens of bomb threats and yes, one video stating nitroglycerin would explode in all churches or something like that. But that threat was one of many. I have never read one of those letters you are talking about but I know for sure that the video was up for days and weeks and not only on Youtube. Nice try to spread your ugly false propaganda but: FAIL!
Dozens of bomb threats? Perfect examples of Scientology manufacturing crimes, especially when these have not made the news. The FBI has found nothing connecting these bomb threats to Anonymous and further stated they have no reason to believe Anonymous had anything to do with it. The one video stating nitroglycerin was a blatantly obvious fabrication by our church, when they brag about it in their Cease and Desist letters that you're not allowed to see. Scans of these letters are found online.
Nope; John from CNN asked the FBI when interviewing Tommy Davis. You calling CNN a liar?
Further, that bomb threat video was exclusively on youtube, discovered by Anonymous first and reported to the FBI by Anonymous first. They tried to pull the same trick to John Sweeney, but Scientology doesn't realize Anonymous knows how to internet and Scientology doesn't. Hahaha, that's hilarious actually. We are the final boss. You thrive on secrecy.
Liar, liar, pants on fire. the video was hosted by a formerly pro-Scientology account, and the FBI is fully aware of it (hello, ip addresses!)
The video contains scrap footage from GEP animations (hello, starshine!)
Further, the video was up scant hours before Scientology had rung every bell- even though only a half dozen people had viewed it. (again, hello ip numbers)
Then there's that damned inconvenient fact of the CoS having the only full-resolution version of a video supposedly clipped from youtube (hello big stupid RICO investigation!)
So, you might want to be a little LOUDER about that fail video, I really want to see the perp walk on TV.
Dream on, boy, if anything of what you say would be true WHY THEN is the FBI arresting Anonymous members, why is the US State Attorney charging Anonymous members and why do Anonymous member have to make deals with the State Attorney to avoid going to jail? And not Scientologists? Explain.
You really have a problem with comprehension, don't you? ONE person has been charged for a minor part in something the majority of anons did not have anything to do with- and the current ratio of arrests stands at about nine Scientologists to one anon, higher if we're counting actual charges/convictions. This is why you dummies have to keep spreading urban legends about a school shooting- because a couple trumped-up fair game charges look really tame next to say, FRAUD, EXTORTION, and MURDER.
Please don't play dumb- I know you read every last story that hits the wires, and you certainly know how many Scientologists have been arrested or are currently being tried this year. So I can post, and you will delete it and continue to insist as always, that it's not true (LALALA, can't hear you!).
But...Why? Seriously, why do you do that?
And please answer without the "ORLYs." It's creepy, out of place, and hypocritical.
Yes, I am reading a lot of news. About Anonymous members being arrested, jailed, charged and/or put on probation. But nothing about Scientologists being arrested. In any case, I wasted enough time with you troll. Bye.
But yes, you are definitely the subject of no fewer than four major investigations, which is why Miscavige is hoarding real estate. One day you'll wake up to find the majority of the real estate up for sale and the orgs homeless.
Where he'll go is what makes me wonder- how many countries have banned Scientology now? Two more heading that direction this year, too. No wonder you're acting nuts.
Nope. It was proven, which was why the FBI publicly stated anonymous was not responsible.
Are you allowed to read the internet by yourself? I can never figure out if you're just making boldfaced lies, or if you really just avoid looking for the truth? I'm baffled.
what's creepy is to total absence of any facts in what you say. it's not only your intentional lying that makes me sad it's that you actually believe this crap.
There is no absence of facts here, except in your comments or your propaganda. How can you absolutely reject incontrovertible truth when it's literally in front of your face?
I feel so incredibly sorry for you, what a horrible way to live.
that's because you don't know where to look for evidence, and you discredit any evidence against your church. the only facts you know are the facts you like.
EEUU enemy of world.
borytho1 1 week ago
if you dont believe in free speech for others then you dont believe in the right to free speech...
hmmm what organization does that remind me of...... o right SCIENTOLOGY
np02058 3 months ago
Scientology is fake anyway.
nikoface 4 months ago
Propaganda from the one of the biggest cults right now.
Number4516 5 months ago
u mad?
xXNek0jinXx 6 months ago
10 likes, 72 dislikes .. that sez it all LOL! "the facts speak for themselves" lol
tomp2008 10 months ago
@shevi04 I agree with you 1000%!!
AllisonCayhill 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Knowledge is free.
We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us.
THEFREAK4498 1 year ago
any church that makes a profit is just a business, god doesn't do business, he is the business.
shevi04 1 year ago 2
oh noes! 'online crims',,, whatthefuckisthat?
theonethatthinks 1 year ago
You're forgetting that hypocrisy arguments don't work against us, because we do shit for the lulz and the lulz alone.
Chanology is cancer now. Still, fuck scientology.
goose1212343 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
anonymous have no leader. I am anonymous, You are anonymous. We are anonymous.
you are going down scientology.
MegaSingularity 1 year ago
They should take down Anonymous's leader, Kimmo Alm.
goose1212343 2 years ago
anonymous have no leader. I am anonymous, You are anonymous. We are anonymous.
badasschickendude 1 year ago
@goose1212343
Haha, good 'ol kimmo chan. U aren't serious are you?
AnInnocentLittleBoy 1 year ago
lemme guess, you will either "respond" with nonresponses that dont address what i said, twist my words, ignore me cause you cannot defeat the truth, or delete my comments. but you definately wont actually engage me in discussion which is a win for me by default. stop following the "church of never winning an argument about your beliefs" and start thinking critically.
fmmetamc 2 years ago
your "religion"(lawl) preaches ignorance
anon all the way
shamaladingdong12 2 years ago
what religion is that? scientology? you should really read all the stuff i write before you assume im a scientologist, im as anti scientologist as anyone can get. stop giving anon a bad name by not really reading things before you critique them.
everything i said was against scientology. ever hear of sarcasm? yeah that was me making fun of how they think. READ.
fmmetamc 2 years ago
so if i have created a religion where the secret high level secrets of it are that we are meant to destroy scientology, but we hold that secret sacred, you cant tell other people about it, or say that it's wrong, cause we hold it as a sacred secret.
fmmetamc 2 years ago
you are in fact in the wrong for knowing or wanting to know the sacred secret without our permission. and it is written that anyone who stands against the sacred secret must be treated as badly as possible by all members of my RELIGION (not cult) and if asked about the fact that we think it's ok to treat critics badly we can lie and say we dont believe that, and lying about our sacred beliefs doesnt show disrespect towards those very same beliefs, cause we say so.
fmmetamc 2 years ago
hey if scientologists respect my rights to religious freedom, and my right to act as if my beliefs are true, how do you reconcile that my religious beliefs (in part) are that scientology is evil and should be destroyed, when you dont even allow criticism. and if you say you do allow criticism, make a concise distinction between valid criticism and hate mongering, as you would define each of them.
fmmetamc 2 years ago
and dont even come at me with the same tired rhetoric about truth, because you are the ones that lie, that's what the nature of the criticism is. people dont make up lies to hate someone or something for no reason. and we have nothing to gain from lying. you need to understand that there are many different religions claiming to be different, whom all have the same core beliefs, just dressed differently. with hierarchal secrets that gradually indoctrinate and make the initiate feel commited.
fmmetamc 2 years ago
and all of these groups actually descended from one group. LRH is illuminati. it's funny how the cult of scientology's standards for "proof" of something are drastically different for things that are critical/bad pr for the cult, and things that are positive about it. when it comes to something good about it, one person saying it is definitive proof beyond all doubt, when it comes to something bad about it, video, 1000 witnesses, legal documents, confessions of the accused, ect arent proof. LOLZ
fmmetamc 2 years ago
o and by the way,i am an anonymous, and i support you right to free speech.
alucard9692005 3 years ago 2
hahaahahahahahha really after all this time, you still have this.
this video has been exposed by anonymous as lies.
alucard9692005 3 years ago 3
$cientology brainwashes their members, if a $cifag reponds to this, it will only boost my point.
belair3d 3 years ago 8
Even I think this video is a little hypocritical; I mean the Church has litigated to get alot of anti-scientology stuff removed from the internet so for anonymous to do it back at us shouldn't be relevant (and I don't know why the Church made reference to that).
ryanfletcher481 3 years ago
An anonymous and decentralised organisation can not meaningfully be considered as a group. There is no admission process, anyone who wants to be a 'member' may act in any way they see fit. It does not make much sense to say that an 'organisation' which is decentralised, anonymous, and not really organised at all is dangerous. Perhaps a more meaningful comment would be that an anonymous, decentralised group, bound only by a common hate and mob mentality is inherently dangerous by its very nature.
poorqualitycamera 3 years ago
Sure Ddos is illegal- Scientology should know, they were among the very FIRST to practice ddos attacks. According to some sources, they may have invented ddos-attack.
anonymous4223 3 years ago
Wow, that video really hits a nerve, makes you lying, denying, rejecting all over the place. "Scored", I'd say.
scientologyandme 3 years ago
I see what you did there...
anonymous4223 3 years ago
I've not lied once, and I have no need to. Can you give me an honest answer, just once? Why is Scientology's version of that video "found on youtube" high-resolution?
anonymous4223 3 years ago 2
Scientology = On going Criminal Organization
= (RICO)Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act & (Anti-SLAPP) Strategic Lawsuit against Public Participation] = Camp FED.
Expect It
LFraudHubbard 3 years ago 2
After reading the sidebar, hm, I guess running your server off a massive 266mhz PentiumII with no firewalls and a huge 5gig memory just isn't enough to thwart this band of desperados! XD
XD
Apologist scitroll postings smearings are poo-in the-wounds of Co$ butthurtingness (hey if Lron can so can we :D )
GAH! XD
Ogsonofgroo 3 years ago
oooh millions emails....must have a superpower counter for this shit!.Davey-Davey too much vodka? You pulled this PROPAGANDA right out of your ass! But you know all about that don't you? All those threats were NOT sourced to Anonymous-FBI cleared them sweetie. Go back to the hole you crawled out of to sign off on this. Your ass is waiting for you! What's that I hear?....Kharma is a bitch!........
MARYBLEUZ 3 years ago
Scientology: the cult of lies and fail.
doobedoo22 3 years ago
Outrageous,how can people attack such an innocent,caring church,after all the things they have done to enrich the world.I am simply disgusted,in fact i am simply seething.Life will never be the same.
squilky1951 3 years ago
LOL... this after CO$ attempted to have ALL anti-Scientology videos removed. Not to mention, those bomb threats were found by investigators to have been made by SCIENTOLOGY.... against themselves. What a joke.
DeadEnd39 3 years ago 3
Nope dudes.. the video showed me the light.. I am no longer going to participate in Chanology and INSTEAD will seek out a free stress test. I am told everything will make sense afterwards.. Benu 4Life.. Benu for President.. Tom Cruise for GLAD president.
thelonius2000 3 years ago
$cientology just can't help but reveal themselves.
fred26er 3 years ago 4
Wow, how ridiculous..
firstcoming 3 years ago 4
As usual, far be it for Co$ to let facts stand in the way of their blatant propaganda machinery as it chugs along, Asthmatic Dwarf at the helm, dragging its lame body through the cesspools of ignorance and wallowing in in pits of stupidity.
GAH!
:D
Ogsonofgroo 3 years ago 6
Asthmatic? Sure;y, if he has OT powers, he's immune to such problems, right? And he's a Clear, so he must have perfect recall... so I guess that means he doesn't need a telephone directory. (Either that or he's a lying little poodle.)
doobedoo22 3 years ago
LOL! Could you possibly be any more lame?
At least Anon doesn't go around punching people in the face:
v=dnN--hbe_9M
A $cientologist in handcuffs, what a beautiful sight!
Stupid troll is fail, AGAIN. But thanks for the laugh!
cultssuck 3 years ago 7
LOL
Cool, a sequel! Not as hilarious as the original, but still amusing. Do they honestly think this is gonna change anything? Google "dead agenting", btw.
"Sourced to Anonymous"? WTF? Anonymous is not an organization, it's a leaderless collective. So if SOMEONE makes a threatening phone call and doesn't give his name (LOL), he's obviously ANONYMOUS. DUH.
Fail propaganda is fail. Co$ must be getting really desperate.
AnonRanGER01 3 years ago 5
oh yeah, and you have NO sources for ANY of your claims. go back to highschool, they teach you that kind of stuff there.
iq1000cemge 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck You Pussy!
We Are LEgion!
Your Mams will suck Our 9000 penises!
We Are LEgion!
Black Metal is for Faggots!
We Are ANONYMOUS
Fear Us!
ANONYMOUSisLegion213 3 years ago
what the hack? i hate scientology. how old are you??
iq1000cemge 3 years ago 2
anonymous is not a real "organization". we are just a lot of people with the will to help members of scientology. we do not harass single persons or members of this cult, we want to fight the people who get RICH by brainwashing others. anonymous will never use physical force. not even agaist the highest leaders. we do respect people that got brainwashed by the methods of scientology. again, anonymous does NOT fight scientology members but the scary, frightening methods they use.
iq1000cemge 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck You Pussy!
We Are LEgion!
Your Mams will suck Our 9000 penises!
We Are LEgion!
Black Metal is for Faggots!
We Are ANONYMOUS
Fear Us!
ANONYMOUSisLegion213 3 years ago
haha FAIL your vids are FAIL remember your FAKE BOMB THREATS? saying anon would some how accumulate 100s of kilos of nitro. -__- shut up no one believes you no one ever will. UFO CULT
ThetanMonger 3 years ago 13
I remember Anonymous fake bomb threats (fake because they did not explode)and I remember police coming to evacuate buildings because of Anonymous "for the lulz" action.
scientologyandme 3 years ago
if you believe a bunch of kids can come up with hundreds of kilos of nitro then you are beyond reason, not even the military can come up with that amount of nitro un-noticed so dont believe everything you hear, especially if it would be down right idiotic to believe.
ThetanMonger 3 years ago 5
so what. someone did a video threatening to detonate 5 kilogram of nitroglycerin. how would you feel receiving such a threat? then google for nitro and you find that there are instructions to make it on the net. would you file a criminal complaint? i would and i understand if the church does.
scientologyandme 3 years ago
On the Anonymous Hate Crimes DVD, the quality of the bomb threat video is much greater than the quality as if it were ripped off of youtube. It's quite possible the Church of Scientology manufactured that video in order to discredit Anonymous. This wouldn't be the first time either; Operation Freakout anyone? You are so limited in your tech so much that you have to repeat tactics, OSA. What is this, 1970?
CommentsOpener 3 years ago 7
It never crossed your mind that the video codec used might have changed the picture? It is not the quality of the video that is different, the colors are. I heard this spin before but no comprehensible evidence.
scientologyandme 3 years ago
When your cult of a Church includes this information in Cease and Desist letters and the video has only been up on YouTube for 2 hours tops, it's certainly evidence. Your Church is scum, OSA. You call everyone who criticizes your church a criminal, and attack the source of the claims rather than the claims. We are not John Sweeney; we are a leaderless organization dedicated to exposing the truth about your Church. Your days of hiding behind the cloak of religion are numbered.
CommentsOpener 3 years ago 4
Bullshit. That nitro video was and still is up on several Anonymous websites, asshole. If you have no fucking clue what you are talking about shut up and GTFO.
scientologyandme 3 years ago
Links or STFU and GTFO
FraggedMind 3 years ago 2
But it's true; cease and desist letters sent out by attorneys hired by the Church of Scientology brag about how Anonymous sent them a video threatening to blow up churches all over the world. This video was only up for at most two hours, but Scientology still managed to use this clip to try and discredit Anonymous. Just like they've bragged about a bomb threat sent from an internet cafe involving John Sweeney, they repeat this same tactic with this video. You OSA can't think outside the box.
CommentsOpener 3 years ago 3
Problem is, there have been dozens of bomb threats and yes, one video stating nitroglycerin would explode in all churches or something like that. But that threat was one of many. I have never read one of those letters you are talking about but I know for sure that the video was up for days and weeks and not only on Youtube. Nice try to spread your ugly false propaganda but: FAIL!
scientologyandme 3 years ago
Dozens of bomb threats? Perfect examples of Scientology manufacturing crimes, especially when these have not made the news. The FBI has found nothing connecting these bomb threats to Anonymous and further stated they have no reason to believe Anonymous had anything to do with it. The one video stating nitroglycerin was a blatantly obvious fabrication by our church, when they brag about it in their Cease and Desist letters that you're not allowed to see. Scans of these letters are found online.
CommentsOpener 3 years ago 2
So you work for the FBI and you are one of their spokespeople?
scientologyandme 3 years ago
Nope; John from CNN asked the FBI when interviewing Tommy Davis. You calling CNN a liar?
Further, that bomb threat video was exclusively on youtube, discovered by Anonymous first and reported to the FBI by Anonymous first. They tried to pull the same trick to John Sweeney, but Scientology doesn't realize Anonymous knows how to internet and Scientology doesn't. Hahaha, that's hilarious actually. We are the final boss. You thrive on secrecy.
CommentsOpener 3 years ago 3
Liar, liar, pants on fire. the video was hosted by a formerly pro-Scientology account, and the FBI is fully aware of it (hello, ip addresses!)
The video contains scrap footage from GEP animations (hello, starshine!)
Further, the video was up scant hours before Scientology had rung every bell- even though only a half dozen people had viewed it. (again, hello ip numbers)
anonymous4223 3 years ago 3
Then there's that damned inconvenient fact of the CoS having the only full-resolution version of a video supposedly clipped from youtube (hello big stupid RICO investigation!)
So, you might want to be a little LOUDER about that fail video, I really want to see the perp walk on TV.
anonymous4223 3 years ago 2
Dream on, boy, if anything of what you say would be true WHY THEN is the FBI arresting Anonymous members, why is the US State Attorney charging Anonymous members and why do Anonymous member have to make deals with the State Attorney to avoid going to jail? And not Scientologists? Explain.
scientologyandme 3 years ago
You really have a problem with comprehension, don't you? ONE person has been charged for a minor part in something the majority of anons did not have anything to do with- and the current ratio of arrests stands at about nine Scientologists to one anon, higher if we're counting actual charges/convictions. This is why you dummies have to keep spreading urban legends about a school shooting- because a couple trumped-up fair game charges look really tame next to say, FRAUD, EXTORTION, and MURDER.
anonymous4223 3 years ago
ORLY? Over 9000 - eh 9 Scientologists? Where, when? You're so lame, it hurts.
scientologyandme 3 years ago
Please don't play dumb- I know you read every last story that hits the wires, and you certainly know how many Scientologists have been arrested or are currently being tried this year. So I can post, and you will delete it and continue to insist as always, that it's not true (LALALA, can't hear you!).
But...Why? Seriously, why do you do that?
And please answer without the "ORLYs." It's creepy, out of place, and hypocritical.
anonymous4223 3 years ago 2
Yes, I am reading a lot of news. About Anonymous members being arrested, jailed, charged and/or put on probation. But nothing about Scientologists being arrested. In any case, I wasted enough time with you troll. Bye.
scientologyandme 3 years ago
But yes, you are definitely the subject of no fewer than four major investigations, which is why Miscavige is hoarding real estate. One day you'll wake up to find the majority of the real estate up for sale and the orgs homeless.
Where he'll go is what makes me wonder- how many countries have banned Scientology now? Two more heading that direction this year, too. No wonder you're acting nuts.
anonymous4223 3 years ago
Boy, you ARE delusional! The above video was not hosted by a formerly pro-Scientology account. But another one was (Anonymous Documentary I).
scientologyandme 3 years ago
Nope. It was proven, which was why the FBI publicly stated anonymous was not responsible.
Are you allowed to read the internet by yourself? I can never figure out if you're just making boldfaced lies, or if you really just avoid looking for the truth? I'm baffled.
anonymous4223 3 years ago
what's creepy is to total absence of any facts in what you say. it's not only your intentional lying that makes me sad it's that you actually believe this crap.
scientologyandme 3 years ago
There is no absence of facts here, except in your comments or your propaganda. How can you absolutely reject incontrovertible truth when it's literally in front of your face?
I feel so incredibly sorry for you, what a horrible way to live.
anonymous4223 3 years ago 3
I am getting bored with this. DFTT, bye.
scientologyandme 3 years ago
Of course, the expected answer. It's okay, I'm pretty patient. That last person I got out, it took two years!
anonymous4223 3 years ago
Scientology?
Xenu?
Thetans?
Dianetics?
Give us lots of money and we'll make you happier?
Oh dear.
VanDoodah 3 years ago
Ooh, look, someone hit a nerve!
Get some sleep, Louanne.
anonymous4223 3 years ago 2
that's because you don't know where to look for evidence, and you discredit any evidence against your church. the only facts you know are the facts you like.
EngramBT 3 years ago 3
Oh, an I am sure you MONSTER OF INTELLIGENCE can guide me the way to enlightenment, right? Links, big mouth?
scientologyandme 3 years ago
We Should BEAT UP SCILONS!
ANONYMOUSisLegion213 3 years ago
Joined October 16.
Yay. Another scilon sockpuppet posing as Anonymous.
The first hint: Anonymous is peaceful. The only violence perpetrated during protests are from Scientologists.
CommentsOpener 3 years ago 2
STFU SCIFAG!
ANONYMOUSisLegion213 3 years ago
evidence or GTFO.
scientologyandme 3 years ago
Scientology Are ILLUMINATI! They want to Destory Chrsitanity!
ANONYMOUSisLegion213 3 years ago
anonymous has murdered nobody - but Scientology has many many people killed by Scientology.
this propaganda from their OSA is predictable.
PROTEST WORLDWIDE TODAY!
Lronsjetpack 3 years ago 18