Added: 2 years ago
From: RaamBarros
Views: 4,814
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (50)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • We have the feminist, left wing, liberal minded, political correct, marxist/socialist type for this mess as usal. They make a mess of everything.

  • There are Laws, Court and Police practices that encourage an epidemic of False Accusations of Domestic Violence, Abuse and Rape in this country. Women gain from False Accusations - Why?

    The "Feminist" Ideology that is now Indoctrinated into Politics, the Government, Courts, Police and General Public, that:

    - Women are Good, Men are Bad!

    - Women are helpless Victims, Men are Perpetrators!

    - Women need Help and Protection, Men must be Restrained, Prosecuted and Jailed!

    ... - Why?

  • G00gle: Martha Laura Granados Immigration Prostitute

    VAWA Immigration by False Accusations:

    If you are an immigrant woman, pretend to be in love with a US citizen or a Legal Resident, get him to marry you. Then dial 211 and falsely accuse him of Domestic Violence and Rape and move to a VAWA shelter.

    You will be on a fast-track for a Green-Card and US citizenship - all expenses paid for by the US tax payer and as a bonus you will be getting full social benefits.

  • @TheLavish99 wow you gotta b a bitter person. i doubt you see your male counter part as a human life. GUYS LOOK AT THIS DONT CONTRACT IE MARRY THIS IS WHAT THEY REALLY THINK

  • Comment removed

  • @MackkMama

    Why ? he simply speaks the truth. Just so you know DR Farrell was there in the late 60s and 70s with Gloria Steinam . He simply realised that most of the claimed "oppression" is self inflicted by women onto themselves

    Try and be unbaised and look at the facts and you will see that he speaks the truth

  • Feminism needs a new title , it's the campaign for female privilege , misandry is the new enemy , it needs to be fought at every opportunity , every time you see it on tv at school , anywhere, challenge it is the subversive scourge of our time.

  • @anto1191 The correct term would be "female supremacy". It's not at all different from racist movements. 

  • Comment removed

  • (5)

    ... that is subsequently being "solved" on the system's terms.

    The minority feels "proud", "empowered", never realizing it is being taken for a ride. In the bigger scheme of things, the conditions of the minority may indeed improve, but society as a whole is constantly being pushed to new and higher levels of chaos, FEEDING authority and the "rule of law".

    I really fail to see what's so brilliant about Farrell's discourse.

  • @suddenlyitsobvious Its not the minority, its women.. Black men see this scheme very clearly.. Where do you think the term MOB comes from?? Money Over Bitches!! LOL You can only imagen how black men get it. Black women run around like chens with there heads cut off talking about 'I dont need no maaaan" and in the same breathe claim to be chrisitan LMAO

  • @OutSpokenGamer

    Well I don't know what kind of black men you're hanging out with but I haven't seen too many that see through this scheme - 'liberation struggles' being designed by the system for its own purposes.

    And yes, this social engineering scheme has been used successfully on all sorts of 'minorities' -women, gays, blacks- or perhaps I should say 'oppressed groups', since it can easily be argued that women are not a 'minority'.

  • (4)

    ...each facing a monstrously overwhelming, fast-changing system. As women were made to work, the system would be in a position to "father" and "educate" the kiddies from an earlier age, replacing the parental function and engendering "brave, new world" little citizens.

    All these "battles" are LEGAL battles, feeding the LEGAL system. The US vs THEM scheme is being used OVER & OVER & OVER in society and corresponds to generating a societal problem...

  • (3)

    A fast increasing % cannot give birth naturally anymore and rely on caesarians and basically it could easily be argued that they have lost much more than they gained.

    The system's REAL motivations were that half of humanity was being UNPRODUCTIVE, "useless eaters". Stable families were more likely to engender secure, balanced, rooted people and communities, that are more difficult to control and manipulate than a mass of isolated, desolidarized individuals ...

  • (2)

    It's easy to see women today have lost much of their femininity, & contrary to popular myth -women are from Venus, men from Mars and soforth- are as a rule far less sensitive, empathic, intuitive and "in touch" with their emotions than men, even if many of them like to think otherwise....

    Women today are overwhelmingly portrayed in the public arena as objects of lust, have an ever-increasing incidence of eating disorders and cancer in the reproductive organs/breasts.

  • The suffragettes thing, "equal rights", gaylib, blacklib etc are always set up by some elite think tanks for purposes of social engineering, and have little to do with an honest attempt to better conditions of the one group or the other.

    Women were simply manipulated into believing they needed "rights" and "equality", and that they would be all woman with a job. Now they HAVE to

    work; rights always tend to turn into duties after a few decades.

  • Society contains men and women so whatever form society takes...right or wrong both are the blame...women dont live in a bubble so they influence society and get influenced by society...Men are the son of women Im sorry but whatever we become you are partly responsible...you wanna complain about "society" from the outside looking in while at the same time existing in society its crazy..

  • I don't care for Farrell. He's just another male apologist walking a the fine line between promoting feminism and discussing men's rights.

    The truth is that men are no longer obligated to promote women's interests and it cannot be held against us if we do not.

    Women, through feminism, have demanded the right to compete against men.  Therefore, we have the right to compete right back. That means promoting our interests to the exclusion of theirs. That is competition. We owe you nothing.

  • @gamenode He does promote feminism (in a sense), but he also supports the men's movement. He's just not an extremist, which is what both the men's and women's movement is mainly made up of.

    He supports a gender transition because we are no longer in a survivalist setting.

    Your statement about competition is a straw man.

    Sane women are asking to not be discriminated against for our gender. THAT'S what allows us to compete as individuals, against individuals. Major black and white thinking there

  • @AshillaBeige

    I'm all for women competing against men. But if they are going to do that they can no longer judge men on the basis of their status and use that as the primary factor in choosing a mate. It is unfair to compete against men for jobs and education and then expect men to provide for you unconditionally later on. It's also unreasonable to expect there to be enough men who meet your status expectations when you've raised the bar so high through a career.

  • @gamenode I absolutely agree.

    Sometimes I have to remember I'm the exception and not the rule when it comes to women =/

    The same can be said for many men when it comes to female beauty - expect her to stay beautiful and maintain a job and raise children.

    I do, however, think women are generally worse when it comes to upholding these problems. They oppress themselves.

    I'm happy for my bf's status,but I can only be proud of my own. I don't brag about how I "bagged me a such-and such."

  • @gamenode As a female, I agree with most of what you say. But, statistically, women earn lower wages than men, sometimes in the same workplace and position, here in U.S. It's a tad better today but it gives me a pause. Maybe some is victim mentality, but there are still problems. But who said that women expect men to provide unconditionally for them when competing for jobs? I expect my man to contribute equally to household with chores/babies if he's jobless or financially if it's a reverse.

  • @gamenode But I think we're thinking of two different types of women. And generalizing.

  • yeah so? thanks for stating the obvious give it another 20 years and we will finaly be on equal playing fields

  • victim mentality is pretty much the most annoying thing that feminism causes. Women looking at their lives and blaming someone else- anyone other than themselves for the negative things. It's very childish thinking.

    You shouldn't think of yourself as a victim even if you are a victim, it gets you nowhere, it's counterproductive. People that succeed in life dont bitch about unfairness and look for sympathy from others. They take the situation they were born into and make things happen regardless

  • @Minkki82

    You can just see where the victim mentality gets you. There are clear examples of this when it comes to races.

    We can all agree that blacks, Natives, and Asians (from East, South etc) have experienced racism in America and have been discriminated against, enslaved (I'd count what happened to many Chinese as slavery), murdered, thrown into camps, but the Asians didn't generally have a victim mentality and look at them now.

    The opposite is true for the other groups.

  • the male population is decreasing...n it will continue that way until the end of time...what i find that is both sad and pathetic is that the world is too blind to see it that way and help re-empower men....in other words..HELP men!

  • What has messed up the woman's movement is the whole rhetoric of being "oppressed by men". I mean it's one thing to say that women needed to organize for the right to vote, gain access to male occupations and to put an end to the constant workplace harassment that really did exist up until the 70s. But as soon as this notion took root, of men being the "oppressor class", feminists got their jag on. That's the problem.

  • The problem is that our culture condones the fact that women are not to be held liable and accountable, take credit when results are favorible and just yell for help if they are not, all movies and literature work revolves around the men being heroes and scapegoats, an extreme example would be a kids cartoon like 'Popeye' (talk about brainwashing).

  • @August1977 this brainwashing you mention is too strong to be just by chance, maybe it was all planned to make it so whoever is in power remain in power. I guess that sounds crazy, but it's equally crazy if you look at the media, cartoons like you mentioned, fox news, and think it's all just a coincidence.

  • When a woman achieves success she credits her seductive and persuasive social skills (sensuality), when a man achieves success he credits his political skills and technical insight. When a man fails he blames himself, when a women fails she adopts the victim mentality and bestows guilt on those who were suppose to serve her interest.

  • @August1977 actually its not only woman who have victim mentality, I would be able to think of quite a few males who are just like that ^^

  • @LeonSkottKennedey I agree, I think that this culture is feminizing men, possibly because society has become more competitive and it's more stressful to bare responsibility.

  • @August1977 I would think that the equality would be fine and that most woman kould kompete in what society was before, but I think that by enabling the Victim mentality, is what encourages itself, like a viscous cycle. I kno that in the US people kann sue for anything even self defense, I do believe that, THAT is a main kaus in the US at least because its " not your fault for being fat its McDonalds" type thing. Which is not the greatest example but klear enough^^

  • @LeonSkottKennedey We aren't talking about individuals, we are talking about group mentality.

  • @FFFUCKKAYOUUWWHALLEE the idea focuses on not just the group but the INDIVIDUALS that comprise that group ^^ because without those individuals the group does not exist ^^ feminism relies on both men and woman. there are also groups of men who feel that they are on the bottom without a reason, but then it would seem the good Dr is not 1 but rather an intelligent form of male activist without chauvinist side ^^

  • @LeonSkottKennedey The issue at hand is the very thing that binds them together as a group, the fact that they are women.

  • @FFFUCKKAYOUUWWHALLEE and what of the Males in the meminst movement? hmm? its only the gender but a falsehood of ideals some woman are given. It is true that when you promise some thing like freedom it will sell, both men and woman are involved in the movement^^

  • @FFFUCKKAYOUUWWHALLEE I ment Feminist not meminst ^^

  • @LeonSkottKennedey That's alright, everyone makes mistakes. I just think that if you are dealing with a group where the individuals within that group derive their opinions, ideology and sense of identity from being part of that group, a group that encourages them to have a victim mentality and a sense of entitlement, that the individuals within that group are operating with a group mentality.

  • @FFFUCKKAYOUUWWHALLEE I agree on that but I think that the group also draws in the people it uses for hate as well, the man. Imagine the KKK recruiting black people^^ that's kinda what it seems like but only by making the hated party feel they owe^^

  • This is do disgusting.

  • An M.R.A legend!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more