Not to mention it would be practically useless on an upholstery fire. It takes 5lbs of CO2 just to achieve a 5B:C UL rating. I cannot imagine that being good for more than a 1B:C rating.
@donaldjr1969 Yes, it's a joke. There is powder extinguishers, a new kind powder, able to work in classes A, B and C, while the powder of traditional powder extinguishers only works in fire class B andC. Much bether than this CO2 little toy.
Just wondering if it wouldn't be safer to remove all that unnecessarily electrical equipment - mainly various "assistants", ranging from parking one to clutch asistant (!).
IMO that would make safety better: lower risks of both failrue and fire, and mainly - lighter car. Lighter car = can turn faster, can brake faster, is safer. Instead of hitting an obstacle and having all sorts of systems handling it, NOT hitting an obstacle in first place is better - IMO.
good
niwanasod 6 months ago
МАЛО
leobrynn 6 months ago
A whole 5 seconds of CO2? Massive fail.
chechnya 1 year ago
nice but :
Pok ! Piiiiiiii UUUUUUUUUUUUUU OOOOOOOO ! ~ no more .
total duration= 5sec
fire=still going
you=dead
hitachi088 1 year ago
thats all you get??????
5botball 1 year ago
@5botball thats what she said
5botball 1 year ago
Too small CO2 extinguisher, and so a very lttle extinguisher capability.
too bad...
jerryaltman 2 years ago
Not to mention it would be practically useless on an upholstery fire. It takes 5lbs of CO2 just to achieve a 5B:C UL rating. I cannot imagine that being good for more than a 1B:C rating.
donaldjr1969 1 year ago
@donaldjr1969 Yes, it's a joke. There is powder extinguishers, a new kind powder, able to work in classes A, B and C, while the powder of traditional powder extinguishers only works in fire class B andC. Much bether than this CO2 little toy.
jerryaltman 1 year ago
is that a boom?
Lolinn123 2 years ago
they should make it longer and wider so it would hold more co2
ad some dry material so that it would be more effective and might help where the fire starts agin
bestSVMS 2 years ago
neat lol [po
miritkenny 2 years ago
With this minion gadget, I can already plan how to destroy my car even before I buy it......
BeyondFantacy 2 years ago
i need 1
milkmilk3333 2 years ago
Just wondering if it wouldn't be safer to remove all that unnecessarily electrical equipment - mainly various "assistants", ranging from parking one to clutch asistant (!).
IMO that would make safety better: lower risks of both failrue and fire, and mainly - lighter car. Lighter car = can turn faster, can brake faster, is safer. Instead of hitting an obstacle and having all sorts of systems handling it, NOT hitting an obstacle in first place is better - IMO.
cover72CZ 2 years ago
cool
we need that in us
but
that much co2 in a close space in car is probly not good for you
bestSVMS 2 years ago
one probably wouldn't be staying in the car for too long after using the extinguisher
4K4K1K0 2 years ago
to bad they dont have this in the U.S.!!!!
Fredengle 3 years ago
thats pretty neat! :)
mikiriseidou 3 years ago 2
cool
pubtor 3 years ago