Ford Mustangs have a lot of muscle in the engine. It is a fast car. I like how you can change the back lighting in the instrument cluster and the cup holder. It would be nice if the lights would auto switch colors every 20 minutes or so, on the cup holder. Of course you can turn it on/off. My brother had the 80's Mustang.
only 300 HP yet it does 0-60 in 5.1-5.2 seconds depending on the major sites you check (Edmunds, Motor trend, KK) the RT does it in 5.8-5.9. The brand new Camaro SS does it in 4.6-4.7. 2010 mustang drops it down to 4.9. HP isnt everything. All 3 are great cars but if tenths of a second mean that much your going to mod your car and track it. All have great American muscle looks.
I have a 2006 Ford Mustang GT and I love it. The Challenger and Camero were copied from the Mustang. To me they wanted them to look similar to the stang....No matter what the stang was here first and will always be the king of the muscle cars. Here is a quote for all you HATERS, ""Haters only hate the things that they can't get and the people they can't be." suck it! lol!!! You go sexy stang....
challenger is way better than the stang. looks better has more performance from the R/T and obviously SRT/8 and dont mention the GT500 because that costs a lot more. And they didnt improve suspension or brakes on the gt500 all they did is add another 200hp with no adjustments to anything else
no! the dodge challenger rt acually cant even go from 0-60 in under 5 seconds 6.2 is its 0-60 time which is about a second slower than the get and the gt500's handling isnt too bad the challenger srt8's is too soft in the corners and the gt500 has bigger brakes and stiffer suspension i dont know what the fuck your talking about and i dont think you do either
gt500 costs a lot more. challenger still looks better. and its not 6.2 its around 5.5 for an r/t...sounds like you dont know what you're talking about
its a acually in the six second range they tested the manual on car and driver and the gt500 doesnt cost a whole lot more mabye 5 grand more and it has 75 more horse power
the challenger srt8 can do 0-60 in 5 seconds or less...i've seen videos of the 300C srt8 going from 0-60 in 4.76 seconds with the onboard digital readout so the challenger weighs just as much and has the same parts basically...its not 6 seconds
thats why a stock gt runs 13's and an rt runs in the 14's in just about every test. pretty sad considering the gt came out 5 years ago and hasnt had an engine upgrade since and it still beats a new challenger rt with like 375 horsepower and an extra litre
dude are you fuckin kidding me?...where the hell do you hear 6.2? if my 300C can do 0-60 in 5.3(yea thats right) then how the fuck would a challenger with an extra 30 horsepower be doing it in 6.2? and yea i've smoked a few gts with my car too
car and drivers offical stats for the challenger r/t:0-60 6.2 seconds 0-100 14.8 seconds 1/4 mile 14.5 seconds top speed 142 mph. the mustang gt bullitt(reg gt no longer in stats column) 0-60 5.1 1/4 mile is 13.7 and top speed is 151mph. the gt has similar numbers.
those numbers are bullshit...they also said the 300C does it in 6.2 or 6.3 but i can shave a whole second off of that....who knows maybe even the mustang is quicker than the posted time....the original review for the 300C they had a 0-60 of 5.3 which was correct
I have a 06 Mustang and I love it. The mustang is alot better then the Challenger. But I think that the Camaro when it comes out will be the best out of the three.
the mustang gt hangs with the srt8.but they dont put it against the shelby 500.and they wont put the 5.7 liter challanger agaist it because it cant hang.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Are you serious!!!! Only retards would buy this shitty car. That guy should be bitch slapped! No way in fucken hell could this compete with the challenger!!!
I don't think it compares at all to the challenger, Maximum of 300 horses??? Come on! However, I love the solid rear axle. But really, you have to have a shelby to compete with the challenger or upcoming Chevy when it comes to horsepower, 425 out of the box for the srt8... Makes the stang look like a toy, not to mention it's styling is old news now, they should have thought ahead and remodeled for '09, they will lose alot of sales to the challenger. However I'd still choose the stang
the challenger is too heavy. the mustang is light and pulls a 13.8 in the 1/4 mile. put an exhaust and cold air on it and it will beat the srt8. its already faster than the 5.7 rt
which is sad, cause if youcompare the engines.....big size difference, not even te same class and the mustang still beats it, ford really improved it this time
wats wrong? Are u just mad we have cheap super cars like the gt500, dodge viper and chevy corvette ZR1? Those cars beat cars like ferraris and lambos and cost half the price. And...fuck u.
like you could ever have a fuckin veyron its not an attainable car great to look at but very few can acually get one. when you buy a fast car you dont really care about the interior quality mostly how fast it is and what it looks like on the outside
they don't beat ferrari's and lambo's dude, I know this and I'm american. The only car you mentioned that can hang is the ZR1. Viper doesn't handle well enough and the GT500 doesn't do anything well enough...
Americans drive a lot of automatics.
tnguyen318 9 months ago
how did he manage to make that review so boring? was it the monotone voice, the lack of personal opinion, or the lack of passion for cars?
EatmyDust1311 2 years ago
Seriously, a Toyota can give a Mustang some competition when the light turns green.
I would like to see the Mustang get some better tires, mileage and engine performance because it's really showing its age.
TechTalkGuy 2 years ago
what yota might you be talking about?
ehalling 2 years ago 2
I lke the interior changing light
happyboyy8k 2 years ago
Ford Mustangs have a lot of muscle in the engine. It is a fast car. I like how you can change the back lighting in the instrument cluster and the cup holder. It would be nice if the lights would auto switch colors every 20 minutes or so, on the cup holder. Of course you can turn it on/off. My brother had the 80's Mustang.
tnguyen318 2 years ago
drop the live rear alxe my ass... wheres your drag racing spirit
mustangfan00 2 years ago 3
45th Anniversary Mustang FORD all the way
seether909 2 years ago
that guage cluster is GAY
xxxIzekeIxxx 2 years ago
I want a black GT Mustang
TheCon08 2 years ago
only 300 HP yet it does 0-60 in 5.1-5.2 seconds depending on the major sites you check (Edmunds, Motor trend, KK) the RT does it in 5.8-5.9. The brand new Camaro SS does it in 4.6-4.7. 2010 mustang drops it down to 4.9. HP isnt everything. All 3 are great cars but if tenths of a second mean that much your going to mod your car and track it. All have great American muscle looks.
WSTPIII 2 years ago
wow only 300 HP from a V8!? Come on Ford you can do better than that!
twenty514 2 years ago 2
the roof sucks! specially with that thing that wont cover the sun for good!
iiiFrederickiii 2 years ago
Not very good. Only 300HP.
That sucks for a 4.6L V8 N/A or otherwise.
112namrepus 2 years ago
that car look like the lexus sense for and lexus merged all of teir cars look the same now ford needs to stop making thses cars with lexus
reviewsitedollars 2 years ago
"control through the corners" you hear that guys? lmao
ihatesafesmartdriver 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nice but the aveo is better car
Ganbala 3 years ago
funny
fuckyou631993 3 years ago
I have a 2006 Ford Mustang GT and I love it. The Challenger and Camero were copied from the Mustang. To me they wanted them to look similar to the stang....No matter what the stang was here first and will always be the king of the muscle cars. Here is a quote for all you HATERS, ""Haters only hate the things that they can't get and the people they can't be." suck it! lol!!! You go sexy stang....
TafoyaNor 3 years ago 2
challenger is way better than the stang. looks better has more performance from the R/T and obviously SRT/8 and dont mention the GT500 because that costs a lot more. And they didnt improve suspension or brakes on the gt500 all they did is add another 200hp with no adjustments to anything else
scarb0r0 3 years ago
no! the dodge challenger rt acually cant even go from 0-60 in under 5 seconds 6.2 is its 0-60 time which is about a second slower than the get and the gt500's handling isnt too bad the challenger srt8's is too soft in the corners and the gt500 has bigger brakes and stiffer suspension i dont know what the fuck your talking about and i dont think you do either
fuckyou631993 3 years ago
gt500 costs a lot more. challenger still looks better. and its not 6.2 its around 5.5 for an r/t...sounds like you dont know what you're talking about
scarb0r0 3 years ago
its a acually in the six second range they tested the manual on car and driver and the gt500 doesnt cost a whole lot more mabye 5 grand more and it has 75 more horse power
fuckyou631993 3 years ago
the challenger srt8 can do 0-60 in 5 seconds or less...i've seen videos of the 300C srt8 going from 0-60 in 4.76 seconds with the onboard digital readout so the challenger weighs just as much and has the same parts basically...its not 6 seconds
scarb0r0 3 years ago
im talking about the rt with the 5.7 litre which competes with the gt which would crush it
fuckyou631993 3 years ago
the rt would still kill a mustang gt
scarb0r0 3 years ago
thats why a stock gt runs 13's and an rt runs in the 14's in just about every test. pretty sad considering the gt came out 5 years ago and hasnt had an engine upgrade since and it still beats a new challenger rt with like 375 horsepower and an extra litre
fuckyou631993 3 years ago
the mustang also weighs a lot less than the r/t does....and the r/t beats it from 0-60 but after that the gt catches up
scarb0r0 3 years ago
no sorry. the gt is faster to sixty and faster in the quarter mile you dont have any fucking idea what your talking about
fuckyou631993 3 years ago 2
dude are you fuckin kidding me?...where the hell do you hear 6.2? if my 300C can do 0-60 in 5.3(yea thats right) then how the fuck would a challenger with an extra 30 horsepower be doing it in 6.2? and yea i've smoked a few gts with my car too
scarb0r0 3 years ago
car and drivers offical stats for the challenger r/t:0-60 6.2 seconds 0-100 14.8 seconds 1/4 mile 14.5 seconds top speed 142 mph. the mustang gt bullitt(reg gt no longer in stats column) 0-60 5.1 1/4 mile is 13.7 and top speed is 151mph. the gt has similar numbers.
fuckyou631993 3 years ago
those numbers are bullshit...they also said the 300C does it in 6.2 or 6.3 but i can shave a whole second off of that....who knows maybe even the mustang is quicker than the posted time....the original review for the 300C they had a 0-60 of 5.3 which was correct
scarb0r0 3 years ago
whatever man im done arguing about it neither car is that good
fuckyou631993 3 years ago
the srt 10 challenger yea not the srt 8 look it up will beat a gt 500 mustange
isaiaht337 3 years ago 2
Why can't you have a climate control???
5Qu1Z33r 3 years ago
I have a 06 Mustang and I love it. The mustang is alot better then the Challenger. But I think that the Camaro when it comes out will be the best out of the three.
williamsone2006 3 years ago
the mustang gt hangs with the srt8.but they dont put it against the shelby 500.and they wont put the 5.7 liter challanger agaist it because it cant hang.
doubler121 3 years ago 3
the gt500 was mad to compete with the dodge viper and chevy corvette. Not because it can "hang."
xxMafia101 3 years ago
this car looks sooo hot....just too bad it cant go around corners
wowitsmaurice 3 years ago
who cares when you got the look and power to smoke most cars on the road and have so much fun.
pkidro 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Are you serious!!!! Only retards would buy this shitty car. That guy should be bitch slapped! No way in fucken hell could this compete with the challenger!!!
Napopeles101 3 years ago
for sure ill take a challenger over this, given the opportunity.
nezj89 3 years ago
I don't think it compares at all to the challenger, Maximum of 300 horses??? Come on! However, I love the solid rear axle. But really, you have to have a shelby to compete with the challenger or upcoming Chevy when it comes to horsepower, 425 out of the box for the srt8... Makes the stang look like a toy, not to mention it's styling is old news now, they should have thought ahead and remodeled for '09, they will lose alot of sales to the challenger. However I'd still choose the stang
warrj7462 3 years ago
the challenger is too heavy. the mustang is light and pulls a 13.8 in the 1/4 mile. put an exhaust and cold air on it and it will beat the srt8. its already faster than the 5.7 rt
muscletruckdude 3 years ago
I Agree... Looks better than the stang though
warrj7462 3 years ago
yeah, definitely
muscletruckdude 3 years ago
which is sad, cause if youcompare the engines.....big size difference, not even te same class and the mustang still beats it, ford really improved it this time
pkidro 3 years ago
Cant wait to see the Camaro vs Challenger vs Mustang comparison.
daeladub 3 years ago 8
hello pleace unlpad the video of
honda accord LX pleace men
chicolocojaja 3 years ago
Just put some newspaper between the sun shade and the glass roof. ;)
oilhammer04 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This mustang is so boring and outdated, the really need to update it BEFORE 2010...and yes american cars are still SHIT...
davewhodavedunn 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah, European cars pwns!
LeysinAmericanSchool 3 years ago
pwns?? my god, wat r u 12 years old or something??
xxMafia101 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well face it man, American cars do suck.
LeysinAmericanSchool 3 years ago
Eat some chocolate and chill out. How about the Swiss made cars, how good are they?
wavefool 3 years ago
lets look at like this...canada dosent even make cars....
DONNYBOYY28 3 years ago
actually canada manufactures MANY u.s. cars.
the Dodge Challenger is made in Canada.
and American cars are more badass than asia or europe. period
R0JIBLANC0 3 years ago 10
canada does not make cars! they put cars together! There is no canadian auto maker
DONNYBOYY28 3 years ago
american cars are indeed shit :)
coandcaiv 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
american cars are very primitive. interiors are trashy. interior like in 80's mercedes. Fuck american cars
GuitarOfTheBlues 3 years ago
if u dont like them, dont watch the fuckin video dumbass.
xxMafia101 3 years ago
The thing is, that we Americans could give a fuck less about the interior. And if the leather isnt premium leather or there so call "cheap" plastics
xxMafia101 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hahaha, american cars are trashy, german cars, british cars, italian cars this is power. and.... fuck you
GuitarOfTheBlues 3 years ago
wats wrong? Are u just mad we have cheap super cars like the gt500, dodge viper and chevy corvette ZR1? Those cars beat cars like ferraris and lambos and cost half the price. And...fuck u.
xxMafia101 3 years ago 5
I talking about luxury inside cars, not about speed. but bugatti veyron is european car. and..... fuck you ;p
GuitarOfTheBlues 3 years ago
The SSC Ultimate areo is American so... fuck you
bailout62256 3 years ago
yeah and the hennesy venom viper beat the shit out of it in a 0-200 run. and.......no its too easy
vSupermanv 3 years ago 2
like you could ever have a fuckin veyron its not an attainable car great to look at but very few can acually get one. when you buy a fast car you dont really care about the interior quality mostly how fast it is and what it looks like on the outside
fuckyou631993 3 years ago
they don't beat ferrari's and lambo's dude, I know this and I'm american. The only car you mentioned that can hang is the ZR1. Viper doesn't handle well enough and the GT500 doesn't do anything well enough...
wideopen704 3 years ago
@xxMafia101 yes but when you try to race it on a track you crash .
Fille3133 1 year ago
@Fille3133 Maybe because they are real drivers cars.
xxMafia101 1 year ago
@xxMafia101 who?
Fille3133 1 year ago
Your rite!!
roboman79 3 years ago
British cars? they had the most reliability problems untill the germans and americans took over the companies
blackdubsociety 3 years ago
too bad mustangs arent tooo great.... i love them and everybody else in montreal does too - cant go a block without seein one
Ji99i3 3 years ago 3