Added: 3 years ago
From: Carscom
Views: 22,495
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (76)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Americans drive a lot of automatics.

  • how did he manage to make that review so boring? was it the monotone voice, the lack of personal opinion, or the lack of passion for cars?

  • Seriously, a Toyota can give a Mustang some competition when the light turns green.

    I would like to see the Mustang get some better tires, mileage and engine performance because it's really showing its age.

  • what yota might you be talking about?

  • I lke the interior changing light

  • Ford Mustangs have a lot of muscle in the engine. It is a fast car. I like how you can change the back lighting in the instrument cluster and the cup holder. It would be nice if the lights would auto switch colors every 20 minutes or so, on the cup holder. Of course you can turn it on/off. My brother had the 80's Mustang.

  • drop the live rear alxe my ass... wheres your drag racing spirit

  • 45th Anniversary Mustang FORD all the way

  • that guage cluster is GAY

  • I want a black GT Mustang

  • only 300 HP yet it does 0-60 in 5.1-5.2 seconds depending on the major sites you check (Edmunds, Motor trend, KK) the RT does it in 5.8-5.9. The brand new Camaro SS does it in 4.6-4.7. 2010 mustang drops it down to 4.9. HP isnt everything. All 3 are great cars but if tenths of a second mean that much your going to mod your car and track it. All have great American muscle looks.

  • wow only 300 HP from a V8!? Come on Ford you can do better than that!

  • the roof sucks! specially with that thing that wont cover the sun for good!

  • Not very good. Only 300HP.

    That sucks for a 4.6L V8 N/A or otherwise.

  • that car look like the lexus sense for and lexus merged all of teir cars look the same now ford needs to stop making thses cars with lexus

  • "control through the corners" you hear that guys? lmao

  • funny

  • I have a 2006 Ford Mustang GT and I love it. The Challenger and Camero were copied from the Mustang. To me they wanted them to look similar to the stang....No matter what the stang was here first and will always be the king of the muscle cars. Here is a quote for all you HATERS, ""Haters only hate the things that they can't get and the people they can't be." suck it! lol!!! You go sexy stang....

  • challenger is way better than the stang. looks better has more performance from the R/T and obviously SRT/8 and dont mention the GT500 because that costs a lot more. And they didnt improve suspension or brakes on the gt500 all they did is add another 200hp with no adjustments to anything else

  • no! the dodge challenger rt acually cant even go from 0-60 in under 5 seconds 6.2 is its 0-60 time which is about a second slower than the get and the gt500's handling isnt too bad the challenger srt8's is too soft in the corners and the gt500 has bigger brakes and stiffer suspension i dont know what the fuck your talking about and i dont think you do either

  • gt500 costs a lot more. challenger still looks better. and its not 6.2 its around 5.5 for an r/t...sounds like you dont know what you're talking about

  • its a acually in the six second range they tested the manual on car and driver and the gt500 doesnt cost a whole lot more mabye 5 grand more and it has 75 more horse power

  • the challenger srt8 can do 0-60 in 5 seconds or less...i've seen videos of the 300C srt8 going from 0-60 in 4.76 seconds with the onboard digital readout so the challenger weighs just as much and has the same parts basically...its not 6 seconds

  • im talking about the rt with the 5.7 litre which competes with the gt which would crush it

  • the rt would still kill a mustang gt

  • thats why a stock gt runs 13's and an rt runs in the 14's in just about every test. pretty sad considering the gt came out 5 years ago and hasnt had an engine upgrade since and it still beats a new challenger rt with like 375 horsepower and an extra litre

  • the mustang also weighs a lot less than the r/t does....and the r/t beats it from 0-60 but after that the gt catches up

  • no sorry. the gt is faster to sixty and faster in the quarter mile you dont have any fucking idea what your talking about

  • dude are you fuckin kidding me?...where the hell do you hear 6.2? if my 300C can do 0-60 in 5.3(yea thats right) then how the fuck would a challenger with an extra 30 horsepower be doing it in 6.2? and yea i've smoked a few gts with my car too

  • car and drivers offical stats for the challenger r/t:0-60 6.2 seconds 0-100 14.8 seconds 1/4 mile 14.5 seconds top speed 142 mph. the mustang gt bullitt(reg gt no longer in stats column) 0-60 5.1 1/4 mile is 13.7 and top speed is 151mph. the gt has similar numbers.

  • those numbers are bullshit...they also said the 300C does it in 6.2 or 6.3 but i can shave a whole second off of that....who knows maybe even the mustang is quicker than the posted time....the original review for the 300C they had a 0-60 of 5.3 which was correct

  • whatever man im done arguing about it neither car is that good

  • the srt 10 challenger yea not the srt 8 look it up will beat a gt 500 mustange

  • Why can't you have a climate control???

  • I have a 06 Mustang and I love it. The mustang is alot better then the Challenger. But I think that the Camaro when it comes out will be the best out of the three.

  • the mustang gt hangs with the srt8.but they dont put it against the shelby 500.and they wont put the 5.7 liter challanger agaist it because it cant hang.

  • the gt500 was mad to compete with the dodge viper and chevy corvette. Not because it can "hang."

  • this car looks sooo hot....just too bad it cant go around corners

  • who cares when you got the look and power to smoke most cars on the road and have so much fun.

  • for sure ill take a challenger over this, given the opportunity.

  • I don't think it compares at all to the challenger, Maximum of 300 horses??? Come on! However, I love the solid rear axle. But really, you have to have a shelby to compete with the challenger or upcoming Chevy when it comes to horsepower, 425 out of the box for the srt8... Makes the stang look like a toy, not to mention it's styling is old news now, they should have thought ahead and remodeled for '09, they will lose alot of sales to the challenger. However I'd still choose the stang

  • the challenger is too heavy. the mustang is light and pulls a 13.8 in the 1/4 mile. put an exhaust and cold air on it and it will beat the srt8. its already faster than the 5.7 rt

  • I Agree... Looks better than the stang though

  • yeah, definitely

  • which is sad, cause if youcompare the engines.....big size difference, not even te same class and the mustang still beats it, ford really improved it this time

  • Cant wait to see the Camaro vs Challenger vs Mustang comparison.

  • hello pleace unlpad the video of

    honda accord LX pleace men

  • Just put some newspaper between the sun shade and the glass roof. ;)

  • pwns?? my god, wat r u 12 years old or something??

  • Eat some chocolate and chill out. How about the Swiss made cars, how good are they?

  • lets look at like this...canada dosent even make cars....

  • actually canada manufactures MANY u.s. cars.

    the Dodge Challenger is made in Canada.

    and American cars are more badass than asia or europe. period

  • canada does not make cars! they put cars together! There is no canadian auto maker

  • american cars are indeed shit :)

  • if u dont like them, dont watch the fuckin video dumbass.

  • The thing is, that we Americans could give a fuck less about the interior. And if the leather isnt premium leather or there so call "cheap" plastics

  • wats wrong? Are u just mad we have cheap super cars like the gt500, dodge viper and chevy corvette ZR1? Those cars beat cars like ferraris and lambos and cost half the price. And...fuck u.

  • I talking about luxury inside cars, not about speed. but bugatti veyron is european car. and..... fuck you ;p

  • The SSC Ultimate areo is American so... fuck you

  • yeah and the hennesy venom viper beat the shit out of it in a 0-200 run. and.......no its too easy

  • like you could ever have a fuckin veyron its not an attainable car great to look at but very few can acually get one. when you buy a fast car you dont really care about the interior quality mostly how fast it is and what it looks like on the outside

  • they don't beat ferrari's and lambo's dude, I know this and I'm american. The only car you mentioned that can hang is the ZR1. Viper doesn't handle well enough and the GT500 doesn't do anything well enough...

  • @xxMafia101 yes but when you try to race it on a track you crash .

  • @Fille3133 Maybe because they are real drivers cars.

  • @xxMafia101 who?

  • Your rite!!

  • British cars? they had the most reliability problems untill the germans and americans took over the companies

  • too bad mustangs arent tooo great.... i love them and everybody else in montreal does too - cant go a block without seein one

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more