Ayrton Senna was a true racer, contreversial may be, but a man with passion, glowing every race up until that fateful day on May 1st 1994.
If You see the coverage before the race when Senna took his helmet off, He NEVER did this, but All i know is Senna Died because of a Steering failure because a weld broke when the Williams team made an extension to the steering colloum. RIP SENNA, TRUE RACER
I think its worth noting that Prost had seen the death of his friend Villeneuve because he he wanted to beat Pironi so badly. And then, he had Pironi drive up the back of him at a rain drenched Hockenheim and smash his legs. Prost himself admitted that these events changed him 'as a man and a driver'. To be honest, I do not blame him.
I also think that this is a reason that anyone calling Prost a coward for stopping in the rain amongst other things have not much ground to stand on.
You can see all the difference btw Senna and Prost right here: Prost crashes at a ridiculous chicane, at 50 mph, Senna crashes at the 1st corner at 230 mph. A matter of style...
@TheMezsargs he drove like that to be intimidating, it was the other drivers choice whether they were going to crash, usually they pulled out of it, its incredible that he did it
@MrSaintSoulja it's interesting though how he was like that and yet he was very compassionate for driver safety, for instance when he risked his own life to save that of Eric Comas at Spa in '92.
@fordrule888 yea he was an extrememly compassionate person and help out in many causes around the world for charity and other things, he was also one of the most determined people to win in f1 history
Senna was the faster driver, Prost was the smarter. Thats all that needs to be said.
Dont get why Sennas 88-89 DNF's dont count btw, he DNF'd cause he was hard on his car, Prost had the same car and he made it finish races. Thats why Jenson finished more races in 2010 then Lewis, cause hes smooth and not agressive. Senna was win or DNF, Prost was happy to pick up the points, and still be faster then half the grid.
BOTH legends and anyone dissing the one or the other is an idiot.
@FRAFPDD they are BOTH legends. But we should prefer to see them RACING for position one and not for the points. Thats why we dont like Alonso. The races become boring and.... the drivers are no longer racers if they dont fight for no1
@FRAFPDD That's a statement from someone that does not know anything about Senna or racing. Senna was never "hard" on his car, his mechanics and engineers say so. Do you think that the ELECTRICAL FAILURE he suffered in the USA was his fault? You have to be an ignorant to say that. Do you think that his clutch failure (which made him spin) in British GP was his fault? This two retirements only would put Senna ahead of Prost in the final standings...
@LouieGee When i post a nice little big up to both Senna and Prost, my two favourite drivers ever, and you proceed to go on about how Senna was this and that and Sennas shit smelt of roses, a fuck off is all you deserved quite frankly. Im fed up of Senna fanboys that will have a go at you if you dont masturbate over him.
I called Senna a legend and you still moan. Senna wasnt untouchable you know.
@FRAFPDD Senna wasn't untouchable, but "he was 'hard' on his car" is a very ignorant statement. What I said is not some ignorant comment made by a fan, it is the opinion from the PROFESSIONALS that worked with both Senna and Prost..
Takeo Kuishi (honda engineer) and Gordon Murray (McLaren engineer) both say that Senna another level. Kuishi said Senna was far away from Prost and Murray said "he was even better at the setups and race strategy, bluffing to Prost on many occasions".
@LouieGee But he was harder on his car then Prost, as such at least one of his retirements was due to this, just look at Senna onboard at suzuka and then Prost, Senna goes down a whole extra gear at the final chicane to aid engine braking, in the short run that gives him a faster lap, but it wears out the engine long term. Its little things like that.
As for the strategy, youll find Senna nicked Prosts setups from 88-89, and that is a fact.
@FRAFPDD What makes you lie like that? Perhaps YOU are the fanboy around here... according to the engineers, Senna was better than Prost when giving feedback to the engineers, as well as in car setups. So NO, what you said is not a "fact", it's a LIE.
And NO, Senna was never "hard" on his car. His engineers say so. I prefer to believe in his ENGINEERS, PROFESSIONALS that worked with him, than in a nobody on the internet. Besides, you said something about Suzuka. Did he retire in Suzuka?
@Shogo5000 That is a complete and UTTER LIE. Their engines were delivered by Honda on sealed boxes and raffled in front of both drivers and their respective mechanics. And please, show me an interview of Ramirez or Kawamoto saying such absurd.
@FRAFPDD aGREE 100%. I AM A SENNA FAN, but it seems you always have to suck his balls, otherwise you are a "Prost/Mansell/Piquet/Schuey fan" or you "don't understand about F1". Bullshit. I love the guy, but this action in Suzuka 90 was shameful, as 1989 action could be as well..... If He had been untouchable, He would had won 1989 title no matter what Prost or Balestre would have done. Similarly, He had won 1990 title without this horror... All of us are human beings, incluing Senna...
all the people who are saying that schumi isn't the greatest because of his dirty games, senna was no different. they both play/played dirty, and senna should have been disqualified for this like schumi was in -97.
@TheOriginalGayman yeah exactly and this was in my opinion a far more reckless and dangerous move. This was after the long straight, look how fast these cars are going. People just hate michael schumacher. Remember last years incident with schumacher and barichello? Look at the 88 portugal GP, senna did almost the exact same thing. People are just stupid, like they call teams cheaters for team orders while 20 years ago it was considered strategy.
@TheOriginalGayman And I forgot to mention that the cars in those days were much more dangerous then they were in schumachers time and especially now.
Yes, Senna ran into Prost, and it happened because he was afraid of losing the championship much like Prost the year before and Schumi in 94 and 97.
It's not because the guy died racing that he would become the best thing since sliced bread and righteousness incarnate. Look at MJ before and after he died - how opinions change huh?
All the fools commenting on here about this crash must watch it again! Senna does not run into Prost, he made an inside move, Prost must have seen him and turned into Senna, MY WORD... what are you people watching, The most you could say was that the pass was reckless, but Senna made many bold passes in his career, but I've never seen him intentionaly turn into someone like you know who did more than once.
If Schumacher had been racing in the 80's in the style that he does he would have gotten away with more things just like senna did. Senna was exceptional but he was no angel. If senna was racing now he would have been kicked out of the championship for this. It's not a dig against senna, it's just how attitudes have changed over the years.
Because Prost crashed Senna out in 1989. Prost became world champion with a crash in 1989 and Senna became world champion with a crash in 1990. That´s fairness =).
@SaradominStrikes exactly... If Lewis Hamilton was to do something like this, he would be renowned throughout the world as a cheater, but somehow the 'amazing' Ayrton Senna gets away with it :/
Prost never learned to live with the superior driving of Senna and decided to crash Ayrton the year before. It's simple, how you act, you get handled and that's what Ayrton practiced on Prost.
I don´t see any problem in Senna´s manouver ... He just continue his trajectory ... Prost close his door ... In 89 was scandalous .. RIDISCULOUS ... what Prost did ... The worst was not Prost crash in the Senna´s car.. was Senna fighting to back to the race .. and Prost doing politics .. and pressing Ballestre to give him the WC.... RIDICULOUS ! Shame Ballestre... Ah .. in 89 Prost burn the start...
I've a question. I'm looking for the race when Senna and Prost remaind one near to the other one from the start to the and of a lap. Does someone know which race was it? Thank's and sorry for my english.
Not really fully even- Senna could have won both 89 AND 90 if Prost didnt start this "crash 4 title" spat. True- against the odds in 89- but possible - Senna won Japan 89 and the disqual was BS - sure he DNF'd in Adelaide but maybe would have driven differently with a title at stake.
If Balestre had also not f'ked with the grid here at Suzuka in 1990- Senna would have taken the lead at the start and won the 90 Title without this crash.
Senna was screwed TWICE by Balestre in Japan in 2 years!
@maranello55 And then he would have been 4 times in a row WC - historically very significant - as some claim Fangio and Schui are better because they did 4and 5 in a row respectively. Balestre STOLE something very important from senna's legacy and Senna never forgot nor forgave it! And rightly so! IBalestre's Hitlerian interference with fair procedure was disgraceful.
@maranello55 Senna wasn't even near enough in 89 to get the line into the chicane. Senna won 2 titles by taking his adversaries out, Schumacher got 1 title that way and got DSQ on the 2nd try.
I have never seen Prost taking out another driver to take his championship.
@Orvieta No doubt Senna was not in the best line to take the chicane in 1989. Which would make it so wrong for Prost to turn into him in defence.
Senna would overshot the chicane and Prost would live another lap if Prost decide not to turn into Senna.
Senna took out Prost in 1990 as a defiance to FIA decision to change his pole position slot on the grid - thus kind of denying him to challenge for the title.
And Prost tried to take Senna out in 1989 chicane remember?
@maranello55 You just said without any doubt that Senna was not in the best line for the Chicane in 89, yet you say Prost took him out? Prost didn't even defend his line, as Senna outbraked himself, ofcourse Prost ran into him as he probably didn't even think someone would be there from so far away.
@maranello55 NO its not EVEN. Senna won and he was cancelled for no reason and he lost a championship. At the same time POLEMAN Ayrton Senna at this race in 1990 was placed in the dirty side of the grid (which was wrong offcourse)..
I know exactly what this was about. And there are 0 excuses for this sort of behaviour. Again this was far more dangerous than anything Schumacher did. This was Senna acting like a petulant child.
Senna had bartered with officials before the race to move pole to the left of the track, where there is more grip and where it now generally is today. Upset by being told it was to be done only to find himself on the inside, Senna told himself he was not going to let Prost in first, even if he had to take them both out.
Sorry there is no comparison .. Are two different things .. Schumacher in 94 and 97 changed his car trajectory .. Senna in 90 didn´t freak.... just this...
@MrRodzilla you don't know why Schumacher was dq'd from 97 standings? He tried to intentionally ram Jacques Villeneuve off the track in the final race to keep the title.
And this wasn't intentional, the starting grid was setup wrong towards the corner. Also Prost went WIDE in that chicane in '89, he HAD it coming because he knew Senna was pushing it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
That's a big fuck you if I ever seen one. Although Prost had that coming for the year before. Also, you can see Prost, once again, cutting off Senna. So it's Prost's own fault.
Prost did the same thing to Senna the year before at the same track, idiot!!! Senna was also not given the pole position agreed to before the race! Learn the facts before making judgements, fool!
Senna was always on his 'own' racetrack and unfortunately the inevitable happened. There have been many others before that pushed the cheating/justified boundaries and survived and there have been many others since that haven't. When Senna died in 1994 F1 was so huge it was inevitable he would become an icon. It's a shame that others didn't receive such recognition as there were far greater talents that were lost in years gone by.
Ayrton Senna was a true racer, contreversial may be, but a man with passion, glowing every race up until that fateful day on May 1st 1994.
If You see the coverage before the race when Senna took his helmet off, He NEVER did this, but All i know is Senna Died because of a Steering failure because a weld broke when the Williams team made an extension to the steering colloum. RIP SENNA, TRUE RACER
AstonDBS90 2 months ago
I would have done exactly the same thing to that French lapdog Prost. He did it to Senna the year before.
red2lucas 3 months ago
I think its worth noting that Prost had seen the death of his friend Villeneuve because he he wanted to beat Pironi so badly. And then, he had Pironi drive up the back of him at a rain drenched Hockenheim and smash his legs. Prost himself admitted that these events changed him 'as a man and a driver'. To be honest, I do not blame him.
I also think that this is a reason that anyone calling Prost a coward for stopping in the rain amongst other things have not much ground to stand on.
DHSeaVixen 5 months ago
You can see all the difference btw Senna and Prost right here: Prost crashes at a ridiculous chicane, at 50 mph, Senna crashes at the 1st corner at 230 mph. A matter of style...
nickie2011 6 months ago
This was his revenge for 1989 Prost's behaviour
NeLLiKL 7 months ago
Senna - the definition of what a racer should be like. ABSOLUTE RESPECT
jakubkrcma 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Senna is dirtiest driver ever, Schumacher compared to him is angel.
TheMezsargs 9 months ago 3
Senna is the dirtiest driver ever. Schumacher compared to hum is angel.
TheMezsargs 9 months ago 4
@TheMezsargs he drove like that to be intimidating, it was the other drivers choice whether they were going to crash, usually they pulled out of it, its incredible that he did it
MrSaintSoulja 9 months ago
@MrSaintSoulja it's interesting though how he was like that and yet he was very compassionate for driver safety, for instance when he risked his own life to save that of Eric Comas at Spa in '92.
fordrule888 9 months ago
@fordrule888 yea he was an extrememly compassionate person and help out in many causes around the world for charity and other things, he was also one of the most determined people to win in f1 history
MrSaintSoulja 9 months ago
Senna was the faster driver, Prost was the smarter. Thats all that needs to be said.
Dont get why Sennas 88-89 DNF's dont count btw, he DNF'd cause he was hard on his car, Prost had the same car and he made it finish races. Thats why Jenson finished more races in 2010 then Lewis, cause hes smooth and not agressive. Senna was win or DNF, Prost was happy to pick up the points, and still be faster then half the grid.
BOTH legends and anyone dissing the one or the other is an idiot.
FRAFPDD 10 months ago 4
@FRAFPDD they are BOTH legends. But we should prefer to see them RACING for position one and not for the points. Thats why we dont like Alonso. The races become boring and.... the drivers are no longer racers if they dont fight for no1
radomer 10 months ago
@FRAFPDD That's a statement from someone that does not know anything about Senna or racing. Senna was never "hard" on his car, his mechanics and engineers say so. Do you think that the ELECTRICAL FAILURE he suffered in the USA was his fault? You have to be an ignorant to say that. Do you think that his clutch failure (which made him spin) in British GP was his fault? This two retirements only would put Senna ahead of Prost in the final standings...
LouieGee 9 months ago
@LouieGee Fuck off you Senna fanboy.
FRAFPDD 9 months ago
@FRAFPDD You clearly have some nice arguments. Sorry, now I see how much you understand about F1 racing...
LouieGee 9 months ago
@LouieGee When i post a nice little big up to both Senna and Prost, my two favourite drivers ever, and you proceed to go on about how Senna was this and that and Sennas shit smelt of roses, a fuck off is all you deserved quite frankly. Im fed up of Senna fanboys that will have a go at you if you dont masturbate over him.
I called Senna a legend and you still moan. Senna wasnt untouchable you know.
FRAFPDD 9 months ago
@FRAFPDD Senna wasn't untouchable, but "he was 'hard' on his car" is a very ignorant statement. What I said is not some ignorant comment made by a fan, it is the opinion from the PROFESSIONALS that worked with both Senna and Prost..
Takeo Kuishi (honda engineer) and Gordon Murray (McLaren engineer) both say that Senna another level. Kuishi said Senna was far away from Prost and Murray said "he was even better at the setups and race strategy, bluffing to Prost on many occasions".
LouieGee 9 months ago
@LouieGee But he was harder on his car then Prost, as such at least one of his retirements was due to this, just look at Senna onboard at suzuka and then Prost, Senna goes down a whole extra gear at the final chicane to aid engine braking, in the short run that gives him a faster lap, but it wears out the engine long term. Its little things like that.
As for the strategy, youll find Senna nicked Prosts setups from 88-89, and that is a fact.
FRAFPDD 9 months ago
@FRAFPDD What makes you lie like that? Perhaps YOU are the fanboy around here... according to the engineers, Senna was better than Prost when giving feedback to the engineers, as well as in car setups. So NO, what you said is not a "fact", it's a LIE.
And NO, Senna was never "hard" on his car. His engineers say so. I prefer to believe in his ENGINEERS, PROFESSIONALS that worked with him, than in a nobody on the internet. Besides, you said something about Suzuka. Did he retire in Suzuka?
LouieGee 9 months ago
@LouieGee His engineers ? Honda gave better engines to Senna in 88 & 89... confirmed by Nobuhiko Kawamoto, Jo Ramirez & Otmar Szafnauer
Shogo5000 7 months ago 5
@Shogo5000 That is a complete and UTTER LIE. Their engines were delivered by Honda on sealed boxes and raffled in front of both drivers and their respective mechanics. And please, show me an interview of Ramirez or Kawamoto saying such absurd.
LouieGee 7 months ago
@FRAFPDD aGREE 100%. I AM A SENNA FAN, but it seems you always have to suck his balls, otherwise you are a "Prost/Mansell/Piquet/Schuey fan" or you "don't understand about F1". Bullshit. I love the guy, but this action in Suzuka 90 was shameful, as 1989 action could be as well..... If He had been untouchable, He would had won 1989 title no matter what Prost or Balestre would have done. Similarly, He had won 1990 title without this horror... All of us are human beings, incluing Senna...
lucianoestivill 2 months ago
all the people who are saying that schumi isn't the greatest because of his dirty games, senna was no different. they both play/played dirty, and senna should have been disqualified for this like schumi was in -97.
TheOriginalGayman 1 year ago 5
@TheOriginalGayman it was payback from the year before. call it even and move on, they did!
khaos5253 1 year ago
@TheOriginalGayman yeah exactly and this was in my opinion a far more reckless and dangerous move. This was after the long straight, look how fast these cars are going. People just hate michael schumacher. Remember last years incident with schumacher and barichello? Look at the 88 portugal GP, senna did almost the exact same thing. People are just stupid, like they call teams cheaters for team orders while 20 years ago it was considered strategy.
philateliceun 11 months ago
@philateliceun yes. just because someone is dead, doesn't make him a god.
TheOriginalGayman 11 months ago 4
@TheOriginalGayman he was a God way before dying...
nickie2011 6 months ago
@nickie2011 a god, no. a great driver, yes.
TheOriginalGayman 6 months ago 2
@TheOriginalGayman repeat with me: A G-O-D. The man had more things, on and off the track, than most of the people...
nickie2011 6 months ago
@TheOriginalGayman And I forgot to mention that the cars in those days were much more dangerous then they were in schumachers time and especially now.
philateliceun 11 months ago
@TheOriginalGayman And Prost should've been disqualified for 89, Balestre should also have been.
LouieGee 7 months ago
lame driving, of mr "racing is in my blood"....
Thats not the way to win a champion....
hgtpunto 1 year ago 5
0:06 - WTF? Is there a Goku/Dragon Ball banner?
WatanukiF1 1 year ago
Yes, Senna ran into Prost, and it happened because he was afraid of losing the championship much like Prost the year before and Schumi in 94 and 97.
It's not because the guy died racing that he would become the best thing since sliced bread and righteousness incarnate. Look at MJ before and after he died - how opinions change huh?
mesenegrel 1 year ago
All the fools commenting on here about this crash must watch it again! Senna does not run into Prost, he made an inside move, Prost must have seen him and turned into Senna, MY WORD... what are you people watching, The most you could say was that the pass was reckless, but Senna made many bold passes in his career, but I've never seen him intentionaly turn into someone like you know who did more than once.
Godznrg4u 1 year ago
senna madness
bloodysharkattack 1 year ago
and the world curses and despise schumacher for squeezing barrichello?
drivers in 80s does much worse than that, no penalty
machvelocy 1 year ago
If Schumacher had been racing in the 80's in the style that he does he would have gotten away with more things just like senna did. Senna was exceptional but he was no angel. If senna was racing now he would have been kicked out of the championship for this. It's not a dig against senna, it's just how attitudes have changed over the years.
dexkeldex 1 year ago
If Schumacher is a cheater for -94, why aint Senna a cheater for this?
SaradominStrikes 1 year ago
@SaradominStrikes
Because Prost crashed Senna out in 1989. Prost became world champion with a crash in 1989 and Senna became world champion with a crash in 1990. That´s fairness =).
X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X 1 year ago
@SaradominStrikes exactly... If Lewis Hamilton was to do something like this, he would be renowned throughout the world as a cheater, but somehow the 'amazing' Ayrton Senna gets away with it :/
MrMangoFace22 1 year ago
Prost never learned to live with the superior driving of Senna and decided to crash Ayrton the year before. It's simple, how you act, you get handled and that's what Ayrton practiced on Prost.
amisven 1 year ago
I don´t see any problem in Senna´s manouver ... He just continue his trajectory ... Prost close his door ... In 89 was scandalous .. RIDISCULOUS ... what Prost did ... The worst was not Prost crash in the Senna´s car.. was Senna fighting to back to the race .. and Prost doing politics .. and pressing Ballestre to give him the WC.... RIDICULOUS ! Shame Ballestre... Ah .. in 89 Prost burn the start...
saci30 1 year ago
Hi,
I've a question. I'm looking for the race when Senna and Prost remaind one near to the other one from the start to the and of a lap. Does someone know which race was it? Thank's and sorry for my english.
EnryVasco 1 year ago
Prost turned into Senna at Suzuka chicane 89, now its his turn to turn into him. I call it even.
maranello55 2 years ago 15
Not really fully even- Senna could have won both 89 AND 90 if Prost didnt start this "crash 4 title" spat. True- against the odds in 89- but possible - Senna won Japan 89 and the disqual was BS - sure he DNF'd in Adelaide but maybe would have driven differently with a title at stake.
If Balestre had also not f'ked with the grid here at Suzuka in 1990- Senna would have taken the lead at the start and won the 90 Title without this crash.
Senna was screwed TWICE by Balestre in Japan in 2 years!
mallamoozoo 1 year ago
@maranello55 And then he would have been 4 times in a row WC - historically very significant - as some claim Fangio and Schui are better because they did 4and 5 in a row respectively. Balestre STOLE something very important from senna's legacy and Senna never forgot nor forgave it! And rightly so! IBalestre's Hitlerian interference with fair procedure was disgraceful.
mallamoozoo 1 year ago
@maranello55 Senna wasn't even near enough in 89 to get the line into the chicane. Senna won 2 titles by taking his adversaries out, Schumacher got 1 title that way and got DSQ on the 2nd try.
I have never seen Prost taking out another driver to take his championship.
Orvieta 1 year ago
@Orvieta No doubt Senna was not in the best line to take the chicane in 1989. Which would make it so wrong for Prost to turn into him in defence.
Senna would overshot the chicane and Prost would live another lap if Prost decide not to turn into Senna.
Senna took out Prost in 1990 as a defiance to FIA decision to change his pole position slot on the grid - thus kind of denying him to challenge for the title.
And Prost tried to take Senna out in 1989 chicane remember?
maranello55 1 year ago
@maranello55 You just said without any doubt that Senna was not in the best line for the Chicane in 89, yet you say Prost took him out? Prost didn't even defend his line, as Senna outbraked himself, ofcourse Prost ran into him as he probably didn't even think someone would be there from so far away.
Orvieta 1 year ago
@Orvieta Schumi tried to copy Senna so hard but all it did was only to make himself look stupid.
maranello55 1 year ago
@maranello55 NO its not EVEN. Senna won and he was cancelled for no reason and he lost a championship. At the same time POLEMAN Ayrton Senna at this race in 1990 was placed in the dirty side of the grid (which was wrong offcourse)..
radomer 10 months ago
@maranello55 I disagree. Simply for the reason that the collision in '89 was at a slow speed corner. 1990 was full tilt and on full fuel.
I have no bias towards either driver as technically, I was not born when these events took place
DHSeaVixen 5 months ago
Comment removed
1984ThoughtPolice 1 month ago
@maranello55 Really, even? They were going almost flat, over 200 mph in 5th gear. Someone could have gotten badly injured from this.
1984ThoughtPolice 1 month ago
@maranello55 nada mas que una maniobra fue a 70 km/h y la otra a mas de 160...
yo no lo llamaria estar a mano
nachof248 3 weeks ago
makes everthing schumacher did seem insignificant. what a cheat this guy was. he obviously knew he couldn't beat prost fairly. and this is PROST lol.
kileenjj 2 years ago
@kileenjj You abviously dont know the history behind this incident. Go read up or change your diaper
billyposter 1 year ago
I know exactly what this was about. And there are 0 excuses for this sort of behaviour. Again this was far more dangerous than anything Schumacher did. This was Senna acting like a petulant child.
kileenjj 1 year ago 8
@kileenjj there is nothing dangerous in f1...everything is part of the game...they don't get millions to move cars around
xpandia 1 year ago
Senna had bartered with officials before the race to move pole to the left of the track, where there is more grip and where it now generally is today. Upset by being told it was to be done only to find himself on the inside, Senna told himself he was not going to let Prost in first, even if he had to take them both out.
spectre1209 2 years ago 5
where did you find this account of what happened?
Bernardatious 2 years ago
Either in a book or magazine, don't remember.
spectre1209 2 years ago
I think it is actually on Wiki as well.
spectre1209 2 years ago
History repeats itself:)
Senna very wanted to overtake Prost, but the place wasn't really good.
Visor988 2 years ago
Indauja 12, yr comment is ridiculous.
Watch Monaco 84 (with a toleman), Europe 93, Japan 88... Who else won without brakes? Or without some gears?
Who r u to say something like that?
For your knowledge, schummy, even Prost recognizes him as the best.
Doesn't matter what fellings y have..
Rozinete1 2 years ago
@Rozinete1 and brazil 1990
fordrule888 1 year ago 3
@Rozinete1 , Prost never recognize Senna as the best.... He only said Senna as the best in qualify, in a free lap.
superpatagonia 1 year ago
after looking at this, schumacher is probably thinking why was he dq'd from the 1997 standings
MrRodzilla 2 years ago 42
@MrRodzilla
Sorry there is no comparison .. Are two different things .. Schumacher in 94 and 97 changed his car trajectory .. Senna in 90 didn´t freak.... just this...
Senna forever !
saci30 1 year ago
for all the guys that do not know it or do not get it....
1...Suzuka was Honda's and Senna's circuit so i do not see how he could loose this race
2 ..even if they've had finished Prost first, Senna second.... Senna would still be champion
...but he didn't want it to end this way
he wanted to take the only thing that humans have against injustice...Revenge
xpandia 1 year ago
@MrRodzilla After looking at this, Schumacher is probably thinking why he never gotten DQ'd from the 1994 standing. WHAT UP!
ShenkieJ 1 year ago
@MrRodzilla you don't know why Schumacher was dq'd from 97 standings? He tried to intentionally ram Jacques Villeneuve off the track in the final race to keep the title.
And this wasn't intentional, the starting grid was setup wrong towards the corner. Also Prost went WIDE in that chicane in '89, he HAD it coming because he knew Senna was pushing it.
sookster54 1 year ago
@sookster54 Senna knew exactly what he was doing. It's a case of; "I will turn in and you had better not be in my way".
blingadude 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's a big fuck you if I ever seen one. Although Prost had that coming for the year before. Also, you can see Prost, once again, cutting off Senna. So it's Prost's own fault.
Tonio31 2 years ago
Prost didn't cut off Senna, Senna didn't brake, it thus gives that impression.
thebones 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
motherfucker senna. he died deservedly for such pathetic tricks.
indauja12 2 years ago
Prost did the same thing to Senna the year before at the same track, idiot!!! Senna was also not given the pole position agreed to before the race! Learn the facts before making judgements, fool!
gs117 2 years ago
i know the facts better than you think. senna is a disgrace for the sport. fuck him and his fans.
indauja12 2 years ago
Although he does remind me a little of Alonso in this sanitized and purile F1 era..... (Alonso is a far better driver though)
sikknote666 2 years ago
Senna was always on his 'own' racetrack and unfortunately the inevitable happened. There have been many others before that pushed the cheating/justified boundaries and survived and there have been many others since that haven't. When Senna died in 1994 F1 was so huge it was inevitable he would become an icon. It's a shame that others didn't receive such recognition as there were far greater talents that were lost in years gone by.
sikknote666 2 years ago
Wel done Ayrton, you did your own justice, though i have great respect for Prost.
We miss you so much.
sunaru5 2 years ago
great video! Five stars
jamesmayistheman 2 years ago
See! Senna held his line. Prost closed the door, and he lost the title! That is all the footage you need.
RothmansRenaultF1 2 years ago
no, senna crashed on purpose. senna was a wreckless and dangerous person
shoemichael 2 years ago
Bloody mongeral act.
ozlnd 2 years ago