0:00 - 2:55 is "MacArthur's March", 2:55 - 5:24 is "Patton's March" I just hope JokerRecordings would change the title and the picture to avoid any confusions.
@CaptainAmerica322 And Patton was a reckless psychopath. Two different people, two different ways of being a fool. I'd rather Bradly any day, or Freyberg.
@TheGroundedAviator Patton got the job done and was a military genius he was the one who truned his tanks around in a split second before any other military commander could see that the germans were launching an attack from the opposite directin. His inutitution and battle feild tactits out classed any other allied general.
@WisdomOfATeenager True but any doctor would say that and plenty of other commanders are like that, Israeli ones are no different. He did have full air support much of the time, when my countrys forces asked for it they didn't get what they asked for half the time (Cassino). In my country Patton would be luck too survive being killed by his own troops! He did have the luck of usually being in a good position eigther in strength or location.
@TheGroundedAviator That is because he knew when to strike and used his resources to his advantage. aIn the battle of the bulge we may have had the advantage of having more man power, but the Germans had hundreds more tanks versus our medium tanks and they had over a thousand more artillery guns. Patton knew how to punch threw his enemy he in fact figured out how to destroy the german panzer tanks . He alone had the determination to take his enemy and the ability to inspire his tired
@WisdomOfATeenager Plenty of others did as well in other less "glorious" encounters. Any fool would do what he did on Scilly, had that "slowpoke" pommy snob (he wasn't as slow as some say he was) Monty had been there he would've been in his shoes. The Bulge was a "great" battle but he never fought against a solid front, ok best too avoid them! And by the time he got too the Bulge the Germens were low on fuel.
@TheGroundedAviator and weary men to fight on a little longe he alone instilled the confidence into his men and did what was right, not what polotics demanded that is why he disobeyed his superrior commanders and cut through scicily beating the british to the punch and thus saving lives by taking less time and loosing less men through sheer hard work and and determination. An ounce of sweat saves a gallon of blood.
@WisdomOfATeenager Monty for the record admired him for his tatical (ritght there and then in the field) skills which were first rate, Patton's weakness was his strategic skills in the sense that he pushed too far into France too keep up with supply, had he did he would've kept going non-stop but it gave others a change of view. Rommel had the same fault and plenty of leader could inspire, though only a Yank would from a slapper! An ANZAC would've killed him!
@TheGroundedAviator Haha he only went too far to catch up with supply because he was fighting his own boss Ike for fuel he was low on fuel and would lie exposed and lose many men he was promised fuel but because he attained so much fame and glory the other generals under the allies became jealous and wanted a bigger peice of the action so ike (probbly getting back for disobeying him) gave the fuel to monty and bradly and as an added punishment kept him out of themain part of the d day invasion.
@WisdomOfATeenager True but his lines were streched and had BIG flanks on both sides with Panzers who knew what they were doing (unlike 1940 when it was a new war, well for the guys at the front, it was a British theory). His so called rivelry with Monty is overinflated, Monty respected his front line tatical skills (he was a stragty man, know the difference?), it would've no different too Market Garden, another flop and I'd rather not get into it too much..
@TheGroundedAviator I just called him a psycho. And about the other thing, I agree it was a fuck up (heck he didn't even plan it all, a guy named Browning did and had yet too make a name, he was trying so hard he didn't belive in tanks or soft grond around a raised two lane road), but he was pushing too far foward and it would've been the same in a way. Look we both have a point and it's inbetween them... You never knew him and only read about him as I and I don't trust films
@WisdomOfATeenager But your right on how he was not hampered by old school battle tatics and due too his later entury in the war didn't have victory sickness.
@gmcclelland1992 Monty's largest mistake was Market Garden. He wasted precious fuel and other resources trying to secure a bridgehead into the Ruhr. Patton was almost through the Siegfried line. Monty boasted he could win the war by Christmas, yet he prolonged it.
@Plasma438 Classic "Victory Sickness"! And belieaving so much in no tanks being there you fail too see them in recon photos, or look at the groung properly.
Patton was a prima donna, and a little crazy. Omar Bradley was a better general, and far more stable emotionally. Patton was a war pimp aristocrat from the south, whereas Bradley was a humble man from Missouri. I know which fellow I would prefer to serve under, and watching the film confirms my opinions.
@BobDeegstheGreat Patton was the best! A true warrior! The difference between Bradley and Patton was that Patton was Born to be a soldier. Bradley just took and gave orders cause it was his job. No doubt that both were fantastic Generals. But I personally can relate myself to Patton more than Bradley.
@BobDeegstheGreat If he was a better general, why does the public hear more about Patton than Bradley?? Personally Patton was a million times better. He actually did wat he said and got things done.
@mrharmonica100 What the public hears more about does not make it a fact. Bradley performed just as well and did it without theatrics. A million times? Bullshit.
@mrharmonica100 When was the last film you saw about Frederick the Great, Scipio Africanus, Von Manstein, Rommel, or Napoleon? According to your logic they were not great generals, just because Hollywood didn't think they were popular enough to cash in on. Bradley was highly distinguished, and first made his mark as II Corps commander in North Africa, taking Patton's job. Bradley also ended his career as a five-star general, Patton only a four star.
@BobDeegstheGreat actually i have seen movies on all of them! hahaha! Rommel's movie "the desert fox" Napoleon's was "Napoleon" (which was fantastic btw) and many others! bradley wasn't as good get over it. and the reason Patton was only a four was because he spoke his mind and he offended allys.
@mrharmonica100 You're a liar, Hollywood has not made films about Frederick the Great, Scipio, or Von Manstein. Maybe the Europeans, but I doubt you would have seen them. You have yet to prove to me that Patton was better than Bradley. The only thing you have proven is that you like him more. I can't prove Bradley was better either, but I like him more since he was not a nut, talking like Patton was about starting a World War III with the Russians.
@BobDeegstheGreat Of course hollywood wouldn't make such movies! and no im no liar go on netflix and look up all those men and i garentee they are on there. and Patton was right not to trust the Russians u dope! just look at the cold war!
@mrharmonica100 Dope? The Cold War never turned hot, the Americans and Soviets never went to war after World War II directly. So, Patton's ideas about arming Germans and invading Russia would have resulted in millions of unnecessary deaths. Besides, the Cold War was a joke. The reach of the Russians was limited to periphery territories, and paranoia about both sides just benefitted the military-industrial complexes. Patton was a good tactician, but I don't see much talent beyond that.
@BobDeegstheGreat Tru the cold war didn't turn into an all out war. we were jsut lucky. but u can't deny that the Russians were very dangerous and on top of that hated americans. so Patton was right in not trusting them. ur bradley prob could have cared less if we went to war with russia
@mrharmonica100 Also,I found Desert Fox and Napoleon on netflix. Those weren't the ones I was talking about. Try to pay attention. Not every great military commander has his own film, Bradley might be boring to a typical U.S. audience, seeing how he didn't have the prima donna attitude of Patton, with his profanity, slapping soldiers, and ivory handled 45s.
@BobDeegstheGreat lol just cuz u have to defend bradley so hard tells me hes not a very good general. Patton doesn't need me to defend him. his legacy already does. and btw he slapped a low life coward. not a soldier. and it takes a tru man to have ivory handled 45s.
@mrharmonica100 That's rhetorical, you've been doing the same thing. The Russians were dangerous in a limited sense, to people living along U.S.S.R border, Hungary, Afghanistan, etc. Not entire world. Lucky with Cuba crisis, but don't overdo it. Both militaries may have been gung-ho but Kennedy and Kruschev were definitely not, they were not about to risk the world, and their jobs, for a puny dictator like Castro. And they didn't. Russia hated Americans? Sure. Why not?
@mrharmonica100 The U.S., with allies, invaded Russia during its civil war, supported Russia's enemy Hitler until the outbreak of WWII, calling him a "bulwark against communism," and then we have Americans after the war like Patton saying we should attack them. Why would the Russians not fear and hate the U.S.? I'm from Missouri, Bradley's from Missouri, that's my bias. But I'm not British.
@BobDeegstheGreat So what? The Soviets killed just as many innocents as the Nazis just for different reasons. Had Hitler focused more on stamping out communism instead of trying to wipe out a scapegoated race of people he may have saved lives in the long run.
@agoddamnsexfiend I wholeheartedly agree my friend. The German army had the russkies on the ropes but Hitler, being the military buffoon that he was, forced his excellent generals to stand down for a period. Meanwhile the Russian winter moved in & the rest is history. That's what happens when you have an unelected head of government run the show. They don't reflect the will of the people.
@BobDeegstheGreat But u must remember tho patton was a prima donna he only fired one general under his command durring the war while bradly sacked numorous generals for various reasons.
No bastard ever won a war by disliking this video! The billious bastards who disliked this video don't know anything more about real music and videos than they do about fornicating!
CARMEX, that's a good point. The rape of Nanking is a great comparison because they're both acts of deeply ingrained racism. The holocaust is the holocaust and can't be compared to anything. I'm glad you brought that up.
Also it's important to remember what this thread was about. Let us never forget..... PATTON!
The Wehrmacht were crushed on the Eastern front. Deal with it. It doesn't lessen the achievement of our greatest generation or take away from the bombing campaign over Europe. It doesn't mean the British/American/Canadian/Anzac forces were any less brave or awesome or important. I'm just saying: The majority of fighting was done on the Eastern front. It's not opinion, it's fact.
Yep, but do you remember how the Red Army was before USA entered the war? They didn't have even enough machine guns and rifles for their soldiers, thanks to american aid the russians became strong enough to deal with the Wehrmacht, the Russian soldiers were eating SPAM (american ration) to keep themselves alive. Even Khruschev admitted that SPAM prevented the Red Army from dying of starvation.
Oooh no, people died. It's a war get over it. Bombing enemy territory isn'e a war crime, however many people died. It saved a lot more lives than it killed.
Normally I don't get involved in these charming political discussions on youtube but when its patton who can resist.
1. Patton was awesome (man and movie)
2. George C Scott was awesome
3. Whatever opinions you may have about Stalin or Communism, as historians every single one of you needs to remember who really beat the Nazis. the russians spent 5 years and 20 MILLION LIVES to defeat the Germans. The U.S. spent most of that time pissing in the English Channel.
@boatmaster5 The British and the Americans were fighting the majority of the war over Europe. The British made missions during the cover of night. While the Americans put Thousands of Bombers and fighters on suicide missions in broad daylight! The British and The Americans had air Dominance in World War II Day and Night bombing that's how we did it! we only fought for over a year on the European continent from 1944 to 1945. While the Russians had to fight to survive for 5 years....
@boatmaster5 Oh really? You call D-Day pissing in the English Channel? You call the atomic bomb which ended the war pissing in the English Channel? Pearl Harbor? The United States played a large role in World War 2. We took Italy, liberated France, defeated Japan, and more! It seems that we did most of the fighting because in 1944 when we invaded, it only took one year for us to crush the Nazis. I don't call that 'Pissing in the English Channel.'
@boatmaster5 I agree with you with everything but the U.S pissing in the English Channel. The U.S fought in World War II too, they lost lives among everyone else, they fought the Japanese and the Germans too. We Americans fought in World War II and I would consider what you just said about what the U.S did in WWII would be saying that all the lives lost were just lost for no good reason. No, sir, we fought in WWII and we helped win World War II. We lost lives in WWII just like the Russians.
@Hickok45jr We did what was needed to be done, Americans don't want war naturally but we sure as hell aren't afraid to put up our fists and give the poor son of a bitch who stepped into the ring with us a black eye, a broken nose, and a good american ass kicking! HOORAH!
The greatest marching song ever portraying George C. Scott who performed the greatest acting portrayal ever playing the greatest general ever! Yes, the stars do tend to align up from time to time!
the russians were a bigger threat than hitler ever was..and remember this.....fascist states never last long....but the soviet union.....might have enslaved the world
Patton was right, we were fighting the wrong people. Now we have Jews running our banks and causing recessions while we all get butt fucked. God damnit.
If you ever get the chance to stop at the Patton museum at Sirroco Summit in the middle of the Mojave desert on I-10, take the time to do it. It is worth the visit.
The movie was great, one slight problem, the roles are reversed. Wonder why they never turn the camera around when Scott was standing in front of the Nations Flag. The roles are reversed...the white guy should be shinning the shoes of Patton, and the black troops should of been in the tanks!!! "Another 'mistruth again' rises out of Hollywood." The 761st was Patton's heroes, the spearhead into Germany...they were all Black...Buffalo Soldiers. Rescue at Pine Ridge. com
@wiixbox360mets Patton would have never involved the US in a war in Iraq. As a student of history he would have known it was never the US's war to win or lose. Iraq was a mess created bey the Brits and French and they should fix it.
@Eagle027 Actually, the "mess" of Islamism came about when the United States dismantled the British Empire. Britain ruled 25% of the globe with a handful of men. Britain created no "mess". You should do your research: British generals warned the Americans about Afghanistan and Iraq and they failed to listen. Even GWB acknowledged the British generals were CORRECT and the American top brass had made bad mistakes.
@MichaelJamesMaidment Dude, the only part of the British Empire the US dismantled was a small section of North America. India, Africa and other Asian positions they lost on their own. Iraq was created by Great Britain and France after WWI. You lying sacks of shit made promises to both the Jews and Arabs for the same strip of land on the Mediterranean, that you had no intention of keeping. If Bush made such comments about British generals I'd like to see them.
this is the theme song for Alex Jones' Infowars = Alex Jones is the MAN!!! anyone who really loves this country and what it stands for would really appreciate AJ and what he does to spread the truth every day
I saw this movie in a very liberal city San Francisco. At the conclusion the movie was greeted with thunderous spontaneous applause. George C Scott's monumental performance is one of the great film performances I have ever seen.
We did not have even close to technological Superiority to the Germans i mean look at the Tiger And the Sherman The Sherman SUCKED but its was the sheer numbers we produced them in Literally For every tiger made there was at least 10 shermans made on our side
I think pilots who flew Mustangs, GIs who fired M-1 Garands, etc. would beg to differ. And what good is one technologically superior (meaning very big, very complex, prone to constant maintenance) on the field of battle? Quantity has a quality all of its own. And when you have absolute air superiority tank superiority matters little. P47s + rockets and bombs = buh-bye Tigers.
Germans had the scientfic and engineering edge, but were lead by a warped fascist Austrian Corporal. Thank God they were so racist that they killed or ran off their best minds.
@MrRolex96 and Shafeone: As far as tanks are concerned, the Soviet T34 is arguably the best tank of WWII. They had wide tracks to deal with snow and mud, thick, sloped armor to help deflect hits, large cannon, low maintenance, and were also mass produced like crazy. You're right, our tanks were an insult to America. Our numbers helped us win the war. We had good equipment, but the Germans were decades ahead of their time. If Hitler didn't invade Russia, things would be much different...
@poxfin You're right. But, all of Germany's tanks after the Panzer II were good tanks. In some cases, too good. When you have companies like Porsche and Mercedes making your tanks, they are mechanical works of art. If they were to ever break down though, they were hard to fix. The problem is, Tiger and Panther tanks came out too late in the war to change the outcome. I think only 1400 tiger tanks were produced. Russian T34s were not just good, over 57,000 were produced by the end of 1945.
@rawdawg15 That's probably one area where the Russians were "lacking" in WWII. Everybody else had a good air force. The Germans used the blitzkrieg to pound the hell out of the enemy from every angle possible. But, Russia is so damn big, they ran into trouble providing air support with the front lines so far away. The eastern front was where the toughest fighting took place. There's no doubt about it. If Germany hadn't invaded Russia and caused a 2 front war, things would be much different
If we went into the U.S.S.R. straight through Germany like Patton wanted and straight through North Korea into china like macarthur wanted we would have no problems right now... Am I wrong?
Are you Serious? ... Have you not got enough milk on your table or somnething? Maybe you'd like to have done the fighting? Shall I get our uncle Tommy to put his red beret back on to sort out what your missing in life? Do you mean ... would we have total domination by now? ... the answer is no .. you'd have 500 Somalias and Iraq insurgencies put together and more white crosses than a starlit sky. Are you a funeral director?
Mr Alien. I apologize. When you suggested it might be best to go through the USSR to the far east I thought you were inferring an indefinate continuation of a hellish war which killed millions and millions of people. I didn't realise you were talking about a charity 'round the world' tandom bike trip with your friend.
so to answer the original question: yes I think you're right. If you and your mate rode your bike across the Pacific you might sink - endangering the lives of family men who might have to dive deep (at night) to rescue you.
Let's see what PROBLEM today is worth another fifty million people dying for, 60 years ago. Is it because people are buying Chinese products in a free market. I thought FREEDOM was a big word over there? Ever thought of asking for your wages to be dropped - help the economy?
Let me know how many battalions you need. I'l go and start breeding cannon fodder for you tomorrow. How young do they have to be before they start getting indoctrinated by their great master's ideology? I can have them stabbing gurgling chinese conscripts in the necks with bayonettes by the age of 16 if you want? I can get them fragging homesick Russians by the age of 17 and flying missions with negligible collateral damage to families by the time they're legally allowed to watch a horror movie
Download a film called 'Tumbledown' and watch it to the end.
Don't worry, the Chinese, Russians, Eastern Europeans and Korean cannon fodders can't watch it so won't gain the same military intelligence - they're working in sweatshops for rice not the Freeworld for Ipods.
I have an idea let's fire some FREE bullets at them, might help the s****y economic situation your in?
At this point western Europe would be on our side because russia is always fucking with them. And as for korea in the north yes they do all work in sweat shops cuz their leader is a nutjob communist fucker
How am I gonna get soldiers from russia and china to fight russia and china? And they r the ones who use their massive numbers as canon fodder not us OR THE UK!
China weren't actually communists during World War Two. They were actually allies. A little known fact - 30 million Chinese civilians died at the hands of the Japanese (I know you keep forgetting that the Japs existed) and before you mention the Korean war - tell me what America would do if the Chinese were 30 miles from your border in Mexico? Double standards mate - not arguing with reason - just the hypocritical rhetoric. FIGHTING FOR PEACE! FREEDOM! and DEMOCRACY!
@alienoverlord362 the Chinese government isn't really Communists anymore, it's just conservative and totalitarian. Glenn Beck's ideas are about twenty years too late. Sorry.
@alienoverlord362 how did they fuck the united states over? by deciding as an independent sovereign nation state that they'd rather side with the ruskies? give me a break.
@RealMarcusAurelius No they fucked us over when they got involved in our shit in korea if our i dont know wtf the president was thinking we could have annihalated them
@alienoverlord362 lol, I'm Chinese, and when I'm starting to dislike my own country (well, not really, born in USA) you know there's some shit going on!
@alienoverlord362 Don't be an ignorant bastard. The Chinese are not communist. They are capitalists now - and hold on your horses because China is today's superpower.
@alienoverlord362 Actually, as of late their economy has basically become based on a rudimentary free market. So now they're just regular old douchebags.
Every night we hear the revving of Chinese tanks from Hereford to Hartlepool. We are watching the skies nightly. Please come and help us. The evil communists who have started war after war since the end of WW2 are coming. They're coming, they're coming, they're coming YAAAAAWN.
This is like saying chop down every tree in the world in case one falls on your head during a storm. There wouldn't have been a Korean war if the Japs weren't having their ass licked for chemical and biological secrets. Long live Colonel Cyril Wild.
Nah we wouldve beaten them just as we won against the axis and at that point we would be the only ones with nukes so it would be less destructive than a war now
Correct. It would also have clearly indicated to the world that you claim to be fighting for, that the World's policeforce is fifty times worse than Darth Vader and prepared to kill fifty million people to prevent something worse. As according to you, that something worse is here already I imagine I must be dead and dreaming. Perhaps I was hit by a Chinese spare rib on my last mission?
Get breeding then fella and buy plenty of yellow ribbons because you're running out of poodles and you just can't see why.
Your attitude is no better than the communist F**** you want to kill for your own brand of domination. Stick to your playstation mate. "'Their' sacrifice"? Are 'they' allowed a vote in this version of democracy worth fighting for?
U dont vote on a war dumbass thats up to congress not the grunts. we had more and better weapons to beat them anyway after the germans kicked their asses they woulda been throwin rocks at us
You can't see that the Chinese are remodelling themselves away from communist internal dominance because things are a clear cut black and white line to you. You can't accept that there can be anything else(any other ideological political economic existance) other than your own brand of capitalism or the communism of the C20th, therefore if its winning in the economic world fairly and flies a red flag - shoot it, kill it.
I know they r changing but they r still screwing us over via the economy its the greedy corporate fucks who buy shity chinese products for less money than buying american goods one of em gotta go
And would 'they' have had a vote in your idea of a democratic world before deciding whether to sacrifice themselves so that you can afford to buy more candy on the way to school? If you're serious and you can see Chineses paratroopers landing over Illinois - call 911 or something. Or switch of the playstation. That secure world would be the equivalent of the dark ages. Without nuking Russia to bits do you really think it could have happened. You want to change schools mate.
They hated communism more than people do nowadays. We shoulda gotten the germans to help us instead of disarming them that would have made it easier. Holy shit if germany could get so close by themselves what chance would USSR stand agains all of Europe and the USA they would have crumbled
@alienoverlord362 Do you really think we could have taken out the USSR with a tired, post-war army when Hitler couldn't do it with his military at full strength? I mean maybe we could have, but it seems risky.
@alienoverlord362 Yes! If we had gone to Russia like Patton wanted we would have been bogged down in like the Swedes in the 18th century, Napoleon in the 19th and Hitler in the 1940's. As far as Korea even MacArthur said 'don't get involved in a land war in Asia.
"If we went into the U.S.S.R. straight through Germany like Patton wanted and straight through North Korea into china like macarthur wanted we would have no problems right now... Am I wrong?"
-- We would still have an Islamonazi problem, but nothing a few heavy bombers couldn't take care of real quick.
If we went into the U.S.S.R. straight through Germany like Patton wanted and straight through North Korea into china like macarthur wanted we would have no problems right now... Am I wrong?"
-- We would still have an islamonazi problem, but nothing a few heavy bombers couldn't take care of real quick.
@alienoverlord362 buddy you are 100% correct, my grandfather, who served in WWII, was all for following Patton, and he wasnt the only one that backed him, but the general who survived 2 world wars, somehow dies in a car crash, hmm sounds odd to me...
14 people are nazis
styk182 1 month ago
0:00 - 2:55 is "MacArthur's March", 2:55 - 5:24 is "Patton's March" I just hope JokerRecordings would change the title and the picture to avoid any confusions.
avatarnarutochuck 3 months ago
MacArthur was the best but no one beat grant
MegaFunniman 3 months ago
Montgomery is still better!
gmcclelland1992 3 months ago
@gmcclelland1992 The entire German high command acknowledged Patton as the best general they faced, even zhukov was defeated by erich von manstein
vondembach20 3 months ago
@vondembach20 Traitor, you're supposed to back up Monty!
gmcclelland1992 3 months ago
@gmcclelland1992
Monty was a half rate commander, and his blunders were numerous. Simple as that.
CaptainAmerica322 2 months ago
@CaptainAmerica322 And Patton was a reckless psychopath. Two different people, two different ways of being a fool. I'd rather Bradly any day, or Freyberg.
TheGroundedAviator 2 weeks ago
@TheGroundedAviator Patton got the job done and was a military genius he was the one who truned his tanks around in a split second before any other military commander could see that the germans were launching an attack from the opposite directin. His inutitution and battle feild tactits out classed any other allied general.
WisdomOfATeenager 1 week ago
@WisdomOfATeenager True but any doctor would say that and plenty of other commanders are like that, Israeli ones are no different. He did have full air support much of the time, when my countrys forces asked for it they didn't get what they asked for half the time (Cassino). In my country Patton would be luck too survive being killed by his own troops! He did have the luck of usually being in a good position eigther in strength or location.
TheGroundedAviator 1 week ago
@TheGroundedAviator That is because he knew when to strike and used his resources to his advantage. aIn the battle of the bulge we may have had the advantage of having more man power, but the Germans had hundreds more tanks versus our medium tanks and they had over a thousand more artillery guns. Patton knew how to punch threw his enemy he in fact figured out how to destroy the german panzer tanks . He alone had the determination to take his enemy and the ability to inspire his tired
WisdomOfATeenager 1 week ago
@WisdomOfATeenager Plenty of others did as well in other less "glorious" encounters. Any fool would do what he did on Scilly, had that "slowpoke" pommy snob (he wasn't as slow as some say he was) Monty had been there he would've been in his shoes. The Bulge was a "great" battle but he never fought against a solid front, ok best too avoid them! And by the time he got too the Bulge the Germens were low on fuel.
TheGroundedAviator 1 week ago
@TheGroundedAviator and weary men to fight on a little longe he alone instilled the confidence into his men and did what was right, not what polotics demanded that is why he disobeyed his superrior commanders and cut through scicily beating the british to the punch and thus saving lives by taking less time and loosing less men through sheer hard work and and determination. An ounce of sweat saves a gallon of blood.
WisdomOfATeenager 1 week ago
@WisdomOfATeenager Monty for the record admired him for his tatical (ritght there and then in the field) skills which were first rate, Patton's weakness was his strategic skills in the sense that he pushed too far into France too keep up with supply, had he did he would've kept going non-stop but it gave others a change of view. Rommel had the same fault and plenty of leader could inspire, though only a Yank would from a slapper! An ANZAC would've killed him!
TheGroundedAviator 1 week ago
@TheGroundedAviator Haha he only went too far to catch up with supply because he was fighting his own boss Ike for fuel he was low on fuel and would lie exposed and lose many men he was promised fuel but because he attained so much fame and glory the other generals under the allies became jealous and wanted a bigger peice of the action so ike (probbly getting back for disobeying him) gave the fuel to monty and bradly and as an added punishment kept him out of themain part of the d day invasion.
WisdomOfATeenager 1 week ago
@WisdomOfATeenager True but his lines were streched and had BIG flanks on both sides with Panzers who knew what they were doing (unlike 1940 when it was a new war, well for the guys at the front, it was a British theory). His so called rivelry with Monty is overinflated, Monty respected his front line tatical skills (he was a stragty man, know the difference?), it would've no different too Market Garden, another flop and I'd rather not get into it too much..
TheGroundedAviator 1 week ago
@TheGroundedAviator I just called him a psycho. And about the other thing, I agree it was a fuck up (heck he didn't even plan it all, a guy named Browning did and had yet too make a name, he was trying so hard he didn't belive in tanks or soft grond around a raised two lane road), but he was pushing too far foward and it would've been the same in a way. Look we both have a point and it's inbetween them... You never knew him and only read about him as I and I don't trust films
TheGroundedAviator 1 week ago
@TheGroundedAviator Haha oh I know it was overinflated haha that much is crystal clear haha and fair enough lol good day my friend.
WisdomOfATeenager 6 days ago
@WisdomOfATeenager But your right on how he was not hampered by old school battle tatics and due too his later entury in the war didn't have victory sickness.
TheGroundedAviator 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gmcclelland1992
Monty was a half rate commander, and his blunders were numerous. Simple as that.
CaptainAmerica322 2 months ago
@gmcclelland1992 Monty's largest mistake was Market Garden. He wasted precious fuel and other resources trying to secure a bridgehead into the Ruhr. Patton was almost through the Siegfried line. Monty boasted he could win the war by Christmas, yet he prolonged it.
Plasma438 1 month ago
@Plasma438 Classic "Victory Sickness"! And belieaving so much in no tanks being there you fail too see them in recon photos, or look at the groung properly.
TheGroundedAviator 2 weeks ago
One of the most remarkable men in history.
wasteofspace1234 4 months ago
George Patton and Chesty Puller are the two most Badass Americans to have ever lived
ajsaccount1991 4 months ago
@ajsaccount1991
Not even close...
CaptainAmerica322 2 months ago
We will neither falter or fail. To be called by our nation, to defend our shores, I just hope I'll be worthy, to give my life is so little!
WE are Americans! To even consider messing with us is a GRAVE mistake!
dumboldon 5 months ago
Patton was a prima donna, and a little crazy. Omar Bradley was a better general, and far more stable emotionally. Patton was a war pimp aristocrat from the south, whereas Bradley was a humble man from Missouri. I know which fellow I would prefer to serve under, and watching the film confirms my opinions.
BobDeegstheGreat 6 months ago
@BobDeegstheGreat Patton was the best! A true warrior! The difference between Bradley and Patton was that Patton was Born to be a soldier. Bradley just took and gave orders cause it was his job. No doubt that both were fantastic Generals. But I personally can relate myself to Patton more than Bradley.
jdmifsud14 5 months ago
@BobDeegstheGreat If he was a better general, why does the public hear more about Patton than Bradley?? Personally Patton was a million times better. He actually did wat he said and got things done.
mrharmonica100 5 months ago
@mrharmonica100 What the public hears more about does not make it a fact. Bradley performed just as well and did it without theatrics. A million times? Bullshit.
BobDeegstheGreat 5 months ago
@BobDeegstheGreat Patton moved his troops extremely fast and with good order and actually won his battles! wat did the piece of crap bradley do?
mrharmonica100 5 months ago
@mrharmonica100 plus, u don't see bradley have'n his own movie now do u?
mrharmonica100 5 months ago
@mrharmonica100 When was the last film you saw about Frederick the Great, Scipio Africanus, Von Manstein, Rommel, or Napoleon? According to your logic they were not great generals, just because Hollywood didn't think they were popular enough to cash in on. Bradley was highly distinguished, and first made his mark as II Corps commander in North Africa, taking Patton's job. Bradley also ended his career as a five-star general, Patton only a four star.
BobDeegstheGreat 5 months ago
@BobDeegstheGreat actually i have seen movies on all of them! hahaha! Rommel's movie "the desert fox" Napoleon's was "Napoleon" (which was fantastic btw) and many others! bradley wasn't as good get over it. and the reason Patton was only a four was because he spoke his mind and he offended allys.
mrharmonica100 5 months ago
@mrharmonica100 You're a liar, Hollywood has not made films about Frederick the Great, Scipio, or Von Manstein. Maybe the Europeans, but I doubt you would have seen them. You have yet to prove to me that Patton was better than Bradley. The only thing you have proven is that you like him more. I can't prove Bradley was better either, but I like him more since he was not a nut, talking like Patton was about starting a World War III with the Russians.
BobDeegstheGreat 5 months ago
@BobDeegstheGreat Of course hollywood wouldn't make such movies! and no im no liar go on netflix and look up all those men and i garentee they are on there. and Patton was right not to trust the Russians u dope! just look at the cold war!
mrharmonica100 5 months ago
@mrharmonica100 Dope? The Cold War never turned hot, the Americans and Soviets never went to war after World War II directly. So, Patton's ideas about arming Germans and invading Russia would have resulted in millions of unnecessary deaths. Besides, the Cold War was a joke. The reach of the Russians was limited to periphery territories, and paranoia about both sides just benefitted the military-industrial complexes. Patton was a good tactician, but I don't see much talent beyond that.
BobDeegstheGreat 5 months ago
@BobDeegstheGreat Tru the cold war didn't turn into an all out war. we were jsut lucky. but u can't deny that the Russians were very dangerous and on top of that hated americans. so Patton was right in not trusting them. ur bradley prob could have cared less if we went to war with russia
mrharmonica100 5 months ago
@mrharmonica100 Also,I found Desert Fox and Napoleon on netflix. Those weren't the ones I was talking about. Try to pay attention. Not every great military commander has his own film, Bradley might be boring to a typical U.S. audience, seeing how he didn't have the prima donna attitude of Patton, with his profanity, slapping soldiers, and ivory handled 45s.
BobDeegstheGreat 5 months ago
@BobDeegstheGreat lol just cuz u have to defend bradley so hard tells me hes not a very good general. Patton doesn't need me to defend him. his legacy already does. and btw he slapped a low life coward. not a soldier. and it takes a tru man to have ivory handled 45s.
mrharmonica100 5 months ago
@mrharmonica100 That's rhetorical, you've been doing the same thing. The Russians were dangerous in a limited sense, to people living along U.S.S.R border, Hungary, Afghanistan, etc. Not entire world. Lucky with Cuba crisis, but don't overdo it. Both militaries may have been gung-ho but Kennedy and Kruschev were definitely not, they were not about to risk the world, and their jobs, for a puny dictator like Castro. And they didn't. Russia hated Americans? Sure. Why not?
BobDeegstheGreat 5 months ago
@BobDeegstheGreat U must be British. Thats it problem solved. don't worry its not ur fault.
mrharmonica100 5 months ago
@mrharmonica100 The U.S., with allies, invaded Russia during its civil war, supported Russia's enemy Hitler until the outbreak of WWII, calling him a "bulwark against communism," and then we have Americans after the war like Patton saying we should attack them. Why would the Russians not fear and hate the U.S.? I'm from Missouri, Bradley's from Missouri, that's my bias. But I'm not British.
BobDeegstheGreat 5 months ago
@BobDeegstheGreat So what? The Soviets killed just as many innocents as the Nazis just for different reasons. Had Hitler focused more on stamping out communism instead of trying to wipe out a scapegoated race of people he may have saved lives in the long run.
agoddamnsexfiend 3 months ago
@agoddamnsexfiend I wholeheartedly agree my friend. The German army had the russkies on the ropes but Hitler, being the military buffoon that he was, forced his excellent generals to stand down for a period. Meanwhile the Russian winter moved in & the rest is history. That's what happens when you have an unelected head of government run the show. They don't reflect the will of the people.
museack 1 month ago
@BobDeegstheGreat But u must remember tho patton was a prima donna he only fired one general under his command durring the war while bradly sacked numorous generals for various reasons.
WisdomOfATeenager 1 week ago
@WisdomOfATeenager True.
TheGroundedAviator 1 week ago
No bastard ever won a war by disliking this video! The billious bastards who disliked this video don't know anything more about real music and videos than they do about fornicating!
14575019 6 months ago
CARMEX, that's a good point. The rape of Nanking is a great comparison because they're both acts of deeply ingrained racism. The holocaust is the holocaust and can't be compared to anything. I'm glad you brought that up.
Also it's important to remember what this thread was about. Let us never forget..... PATTON!
boatmaster5 6 months ago
@boatmaster5
What do you mean the holocaust can't be compared to anything? Look up the holodomor and it was worse!
The505Guys 6 months ago
getting flashbacks from Camp Arifjan, Kuwait.
katz6988 6 months ago
The Wehrmacht were crushed on the Eastern front. Deal with it. It doesn't lessen the achievement of our greatest generation or take away from the bombing campaign over Europe. It doesn't mean the British/American/Canadian/Anzac forces were any less brave or awesome or important. I'm just saying: The majority of fighting was done on the Eastern front. It's not opinion, it's fact.
boatmaster5 7 months ago
@boatmaster5
Yep, but do you remember how the Red Army was before USA entered the war? They didn't have even enough machine guns and rifles for their soldiers, thanks to american aid the russians became strong enough to deal with the Wehrmacht, the Russian soldiers were eating SPAM (american ration) to keep themselves alive. Even Khruschev admitted that SPAM prevented the Red Army from dying of starvation.
joaofga123 6 months ago
Comment removed
boatmaster5 7 months ago
No, I call the Atomic Bomb arguably the greatest war crime in human history. Just look at the numbers dude.
boatmaster5 7 months ago
@boatmaster5
Oooh no, people died. It's a war get over it. Bombing enemy territory isn'e a war crime, however many people died. It saved a lot more lives than it killed.
Myles0Harcourt 6 months ago
@boatmaster5 So its even worse than the holocaust and the rape of nanking?
Carmex776 6 months ago
Normally I don't get involved in these charming political discussions on youtube but when its patton who can resist.
1. Patton was awesome (man and movie)
2. George C Scott was awesome
3. Whatever opinions you may have about Stalin or Communism, as historians every single one of you needs to remember who really beat the Nazis. the russians spent 5 years and 20 MILLION LIVES to defeat the Germans. The U.S. spent most of that time pissing in the English Channel.
boatmaster5 8 months ago
@boatmaster5 The British and the Americans were fighting the majority of the war over Europe. The British made missions during the cover of night. While the Americans put Thousands of Bombers and fighters on suicide missions in broad daylight! The British and The Americans had air Dominance in World War II Day and Night bombing that's how we did it! we only fought for over a year on the European continent from 1944 to 1945. While the Russians had to fight to survive for 5 years....
jdmifsud14 7 months ago
@boatmaster5 Oh really? You call D-Day pissing in the English Channel? You call the atomic bomb which ended the war pissing in the English Channel? Pearl Harbor? The United States played a large role in World War 2. We took Italy, liberated France, defeated Japan, and more! It seems that we did most of the fighting because in 1944 when we invaded, it only took one year for us to crush the Nazis. I don't call that 'Pissing in the English Channel.'
14575019 7 months ago
@boatmaster5 I agree with you with everything but the U.S pissing in the English Channel. The U.S fought in World War II too, they lost lives among everyone else, they fought the Japanese and the Germans too. We Americans fought in World War II and I would consider what you just said about what the U.S did in WWII would be saying that all the lives lost were just lost for no good reason. No, sir, we fought in WWII and we helped win World War II. We lost lives in WWII just like the Russians.
Hickok45jr 7 months ago
@Hickok45jr We did what was needed to be done, Americans don't want war naturally but we sure as hell aren't afraid to put up our fists and give the poor son of a bitch who stepped into the ring with us a black eye, a broken nose, and a good american ass kicking! HOORAH!
MrJorrad 6 months ago
@MrJorrad I could not agree more! ;)
Hickok45jr 6 months ago
The greatest marching song ever portraying George C. Scott who performed the greatest acting portrayal ever playing the greatest general ever! Yes, the stars do tend to align up from time to time!
MisterNifty 10 months ago 2
This is the "Generals' March" by Jerry Goldsmith, combining "MacArthur" and "Patton."
SoloPilot6 10 months ago 9
the russians were a bigger threat than hitler ever was..and remember this.....fascist states never last long....but the soviet union.....might have enslaved the world
1942PANTHERV 10 months ago
Patton was right, we were fighting the wrong people. Now we have Jews running our banks and causing recessions while we all get butt fucked. God damnit.
pigeonpsycho 10 months ago
@pigeonpsycho You're a fucking whackjob.
Supermassively 8 months ago
@Supermassively Not really, I just agree with General Patton. He was a good man.
pigeonpsycho 8 months ago
3:05
THE most iconic "march" song EVAR!!!
yoshi8869 10 months ago
That is just simply not the Patton theme! Wow, epic fail.
scottmuck 11 months ago
PATTON IS THE BEST EVER!!!!!!
PYRATEQUEENFOEVA 1 year ago
ths is not the right theme. you fail.
oci7536 1 year ago
Patton wasn't a bad man, he was just a man
toby099 1 year ago
If you ever get the chance to stop at the Patton museum at Sirroco Summit in the middle of the Mojave desert on I-10, take the time to do it. It is worth the visit.
COOPEVETS 1 year ago 13
@Rarogne1926
Soviets were assholes
Wraith23 1 year ago
The movie was great, one slight problem, the roles are reversed. Wonder why they never turn the camera around when Scott was standing in front of the Nations Flag. The roles are reversed...the white guy should be shinning the shoes of Patton, and the black troops should of been in the tanks!!! "Another 'mistruth again' rises out of Hollywood." The 761st was Patton's heroes, the spearhead into Germany...they were all Black...Buffalo Soldiers. Rescue at Pine Ridge. com
poshportia62 1 year ago
we need a leader like patton today one who accepts nothing but victory
wiixbox360mets 1 year ago
@wiixbox360mets Patton would have never involved the US in a war in Iraq. As a student of history he would have known it was never the US's war to win or lose. Iraq was a mess created bey the Brits and French and they should fix it.
Eagle027 1 year ago
@Eagle027 Actually, the "mess" of Islamism came about when the United States dismantled the British Empire. Britain ruled 25% of the globe with a handful of men. Britain created no "mess". You should do your research: British generals warned the Americans about Afghanistan and Iraq and they failed to listen. Even GWB acknowledged the British generals were CORRECT and the American top brass had made bad mistakes.
MichaelJamesMaidment 1 year ago
@MichaelJamesMaidment Dude, the only part of the British Empire the US dismantled was a small section of North America. India, Africa and other Asian positions they lost on their own. Iraq was created by Great Britain and France after WWI. You lying sacks of shit made promises to both the Jews and Arabs for the same strip of land on the Mediterranean, that you had no intention of keeping. If Bush made such comments about British generals I'd like to see them.
Eagle027 1 year ago
@MichaelJamesMaidment As I recall Bush had no problem leading Tony Blair around as if he was Bush's bitch right up to the 2003 US invasion of Iraq.
Eagle027 1 year ago
who would dislike this
ODST81 1 year ago
First "MACARTHUR", then "PATTON"!
bebgororoti 1 year ago
4:15 is my high schools fight song. Our school is awesome.
ringsavor 1 year ago
@ringsavor I WANT TO GO TO YOUR SCHOOL.
EthanFilms 1 year ago
this is the theme song for Alex Jones' Infowars = Alex Jones is the MAN!!! anyone who really loves this country and what it stands for would really appreciate AJ and what he does to spread the truth every day
mbkillz 1 year ago
I saw this movie in a very liberal city San Francisco. At the conclusion the movie was greeted with thunderous spontaneous applause. George C Scott's monumental performance is one of the great film performances I have ever seen.
ToughXArmy69 1 year ago
This is a big fat middle finger to the Hippies in San Francisco.........I LOVE IT!
TheyHearUsNow 1 year ago
Yea this is not the Patton theme, its the theme for teh movie Macarthur.
classicrocker2142 1 year ago
To anybody that thinks the Chinese are simply "Douche-bags", I suggest you Google "Chinese animal slaughter" and be enlightened
AqeousHumor 1 year ago
Also the first sound track on this was from 'Macarthur'
NathanPBridle 1 year ago
That is my great great great uncle.
Axelfan1000 1 year ago
this isn't Patton, it's the song for Dugout Doug!
rawdawg15 1 year ago
@Shafeone: Please tell me you didn't just quote Stalin in relation to Patton.
Tallman77777 1 year ago
George C. Scott always plays bad#%& roles in movies.
LilATL94 1 year ago
マッカサーだね。
jokerrecording 2 years ago
It's both "MacArthur" and "Patton," the "General's Medley," I believe.
MacArthur is first, Patton starts at 2:56
pablononescobar 2 years ago
Oh! no!
Not Patton!
This is the movie "MacArthur" Theme!
kengshow 2 years ago
マッカーサーだよ。
ponpon472 2 years ago
We did not have even close to technological Superiority to the Germans i mean look at the Tiger And the Sherman The Sherman SUCKED but its was the sheer numbers we produced them in Literally For every tiger made there was at least 10 shermans made on our side
MrRolex96 2 years ago
I think pilots who flew Mustangs, GIs who fired M-1 Garands, etc. would beg to differ. And what good is one technologically superior (meaning very big, very complex, prone to constant maintenance) on the field of battle? Quantity has a quality all of its own. And when you have absolute air superiority tank superiority matters little. P47s + rockets and bombs = buh-bye Tigers.
Shafeone 2 years ago
Germans had the scientfic and engineering edge, but were lead by a warped fascist Austrian Corporal. Thank God they were so racist that they killed or ran off their best minds.
homer63109 2 years ago
@homer63109 hehe... its sad cause its true
magoo161 1 year ago
@MrRolex96 and Shafeone: As far as tanks are concerned, the Soviet T34 is arguably the best tank of WWII. They had wide tracks to deal with snow and mud, thick, sloped armor to help deflect hits, large cannon, low maintenance, and were also mass produced like crazy. You're right, our tanks were an insult to America. Our numbers helped us win the war. We had good equipment, but the Germans were decades ahead of their time. If Hitler didn't invade Russia, things would be much different...
mscmatt 2 years ago
@mscmatt I read somewhere that Jagdpather was the best tank in WW2. Easy and cheap to produce.
poxfin 1 year ago
@poxfin You're right. But, all of Germany's tanks after the Panzer II were good tanks. In some cases, too good. When you have companies like Porsche and Mercedes making your tanks, they are mechanical works of art. If they were to ever break down though, they were hard to fix. The problem is, Tiger and Panther tanks came out too late in the war to change the outcome. I think only 1400 tiger tanks were produced. Russian T34s were not just good, over 57,000 were produced by the end of 1945.
mscmatt 1 year ago
it's good to have good tanks, but it doesn't help if you don't have air cover
rawdawg15 1 year ago
@rawdawg15 That's probably one area where the Russians were "lacking" in WWII. Everybody else had a good air force. The Germans used the blitzkrieg to pound the hell out of the enemy from every angle possible. But, Russia is so damn big, they ran into trouble providing air support with the front lines so far away. The eastern front was where the toughest fighting took place. There's no doubt about it. If Germany hadn't invaded Russia and caused a 2 front war, things would be much different
mscmatt 1 year ago
If we went into the U.S.S.R. straight through Germany like Patton wanted and straight through North Korea into china like macarthur wanted we would have no problems right now... Am I wrong?
alienoverlord362 2 years ago 17
Are you Serious? ... Have you not got enough milk on your table or somnething? Maybe you'd like to have done the fighting? Shall I get our uncle Tommy to put his red beret back on to sort out what your missing in life? Do you mean ... would we have total domination by now? ... the answer is no .. you'd have 500 Somalias and Iraq insurgencies put together and more white crosses than a starlit sky. Are you a funeral director?
EARTHLINGify 2 years ago
Maybe they just wanted to come home eh?
EARTHLINGify 2 years ago
WTF where r u gettin those people from?
alienoverlord362 2 years ago
Mr Alien. I apologize. When you suggested it might be best to go through the USSR to the far east I thought you were inferring an indefinate continuation of a hellish war which killed millions and millions of people. I didn't realise you were talking about a charity 'round the world' tandom bike trip with your friend.
My apologies.
EARTHLINGify 2 years ago
so to answer the original question: yes I think you're right. If you and your mate rode your bike across the Pacific you might sink - endangering the lives of family men who might have to dive deep (at night) to rescue you.
Let's see what PROBLEM today is worth another fifty million people dying for, 60 years ago. Is it because people are buying Chinese products in a free market. I thought FREEDOM was a big word over there? Ever thought of asking for your wages to be dropped - help the economy?
EARTHLINGify 2 years ago
Let me know how many battalions you need. I'l go and start breeding cannon fodder for you tomorrow. How young do they have to be before they start getting indoctrinated by their great master's ideology? I can have them stabbing gurgling chinese conscripts in the necks with bayonettes by the age of 16 if you want? I can get them fragging homesick Russians by the age of 17 and flying missions with negligible collateral damage to families by the time they're legally allowed to watch a horror movie
EARTHLINGify 2 years ago
Download a film called 'Tumbledown' and watch it to the end.
Don't worry, the Chinese, Russians, Eastern Europeans and Korean cannon fodders can't watch it so won't gain the same military intelligence - they're working in sweatshops for rice not the Freeworld for Ipods.
I have an idea let's fire some FREE bullets at them, might help the s****y economic situation your in?
EARTHLINGify 2 years ago
At this point western Europe would be on our side because russia is always fucking with them. And as for korea in the north yes they do all work in sweat shops cuz their leader is a nutjob communist fucker
alienoverlord362 2 years ago
How am I gonna get soldiers from russia and china to fight russia and china? And they r the ones who use their massive numbers as canon fodder not us OR THE UK!
alienoverlord362 2 years ago
WTF why the fuck do u keep talking about fuckin bikes!? And fuck china communist fucks!
alienoverlord362 2 years ago
China weren't actually communists during World War Two. They were actually allies. A little known fact - 30 million Chinese civilians died at the hands of the Japanese (I know you keep forgetting that the Japs existed) and before you mention the Korean war - tell me what America would do if the Chinese were 30 miles from your border in Mexico? Double standards mate - not arguing with reason - just the hypocritical rhetoric. FIGHTING FOR PEACE! FREEDOM! and DEMOCRACY!
EARTHLINGify 2 years ago
I know the chinese were our allies but now they are communist douchebags.
alienoverlord362 2 years ago 21
@alienoverlord362 the Chinese government isn't really Communists anymore, it's just conservative and totalitarian. Glenn Beck's ideas are about twenty years too late. Sorry.
RealMarcusAurelius 1 year ago
@RealMarcusAurelius they fucked us over we should have nuked them like macarthur wanted
alienoverlord362 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 how did they fuck the united states over? by deciding as an independent sovereign nation state that they'd rather side with the ruskies? give me a break.
RealMarcusAurelius 1 year ago
@RealMarcusAurelius No they fucked us over when they got involved in our shit in korea if our i dont know wtf the president was thinking we could have annihalated them
alienoverlord362 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 We aint's douchebags,we did fine during the economic rescission,while you guys are losing jobs
sam9116 1 year ago
@sam9116 Thats obamas fault
alienoverlord362 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 excuse me?I thought the crisis started before he even annouced he will run for president?!Alien!
sam9116 1 year ago
@sam9116 what crisis?
alienoverlord362 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 lol, I'm Chinese, and when I'm starting to dislike my own country (well, not really, born in USA) you know there's some shit going on!
calvinnewspaper 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 wrong they are communist-socialist douchebags
bearhaulin120 1 year ago
@bearhaulin120 Who?
alienoverlord362 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 your comment said about the chinese -_- your blind sir.TOP RATED COMMENT.
bearhaulin120 1 year ago
@bearhaulin120 yeah dirty china!
alienoverlord362 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 Socialist
USAForLife2057 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 Don't be an ignorant bastard. The Chinese are not communist. They are capitalists now - and hold on your horses because China is today's superpower.
xAcxDcx 11 months ago
@alienoverlord362-Well..this might have been more relevant 20 years ago. But it still kinda is.
thegunclub123 10 months ago
@alienoverlord362 Stalinist douchebags
MrRickmowen 9 months ago
@alienoverlord362 If I was president of the USA or General I would already have my forces in there and fought those commie sons of bitches!
jdmifsud14 9 months ago
@alienoverlord362 Actually, as of late their economy has basically become based on a rudimentary free market. So now they're just regular old douchebags.
holycarp1 8 months ago
Yes. keep saying things that make sense.
Every night we hear the revving of Chinese tanks from Hereford to Hartlepool. We are watching the skies nightly. Please come and help us. The evil communists who have started war after war since the end of WW2 are coming. They're coming, they're coming, they're coming YAAAAAWN.
EARTHLINGify 2 years ago
Fuck the communists they hate god and will all go to hell
alienoverlord362 2 years ago
Taking out the USSR would have prevented the korean and vietnam wars. And prevented problems in the middle east
alienoverlord362 2 years ago
Not without a psychic prophet on our side.
This is like saying chop down every tree in the world in case one falls on your head during a storm. There wouldn't have been a Korean war if the Japs weren't having their ass licked for chemical and biological secrets. Long live Colonel Cyril Wild.
EARTHLINGify 2 years ago
Nah we wouldve beaten them just as we won against the axis and at that point we would be the only ones with nukes so it would be less destructive than a war now
alienoverlord362 2 years ago
Correct. It would also have clearly indicated to the world that you claim to be fighting for, that the World's policeforce is fifty times worse than Darth Vader and prepared to kill fifty million people to prevent something worse. As according to you, that something worse is here already I imagine I must be dead and dreaming. Perhaps I was hit by a Chinese spare rib on my last mission?
EARTHLINGify 2 years ago
Fuck the chinese and the russians they can burn by our firey bombs of doom
alienoverlord362 2 years ago
We could have done it their sacrifice would have ensured a more secure world
alienoverlord362 2 years ago
Get breeding then fella and buy plenty of yellow ribbons because you're running out of poodles and you just can't see why.
Your attitude is no better than the communist F**** you want to kill for your own brand of domination. Stick to your playstation mate. "'Their' sacrifice"? Are 'they' allowed a vote in this version of democracy worth fighting for?
EARTHLINGify 2 years ago
U dont vote on a war dumbass thats up to congress not the grunts. we had more and better weapons to beat them anyway after the germans kicked their asses they woulda been throwin rocks at us
alienoverlord362 2 years ago
You can't see that the Chinese are remodelling themselves away from communist internal dominance because things are a clear cut black and white line to you. You can't accept that there can be anything else(any other ideological political economic existance) other than your own brand of capitalism or the communism of the C20th, therefore if its winning in the economic world fairly and flies a red flag - shoot it, kill it.
EARTHLINGify 2 years ago
I know they r changing but they r still screwing us over via the economy its the greedy corporate fucks who buy shity chinese products for less money than buying american goods one of em gotta go
alienoverlord362 2 years ago
And would 'they' have had a vote in your idea of a democratic world before deciding whether to sacrifice themselves so that you can afford to buy more candy on the way to school? If you're serious and you can see Chineses paratroopers landing over Illinois - call 911 or something. Or switch of the playstation. That secure world would be the equivalent of the dark ages. Without nuking Russia to bits do you really think it could have happened. You want to change schools mate.
EARTHLINGify 2 years ago
They hated communism more than people do nowadays. We shoulda gotten the germans to help us instead of disarming them that would have made it easier. Holy shit if germany could get so close by themselves what chance would USSR stand agains all of Europe and the USA they would have crumbled
alienoverlord362 2 years ago
@alienoverlord362 Do you really think we could have taken out the USSR with a tired, post-war army when Hitler couldn't do it with his military at full strength? I mean maybe we could have, but it seems risky.
NYanarchy08 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 Yes! If we had gone to Russia like Patton wanted we would have been bogged down in like the Swedes in the 18th century, Napoleon in the 19th and Hitler in the 1940's. As far as Korea even MacArthur said 'don't get involved in a land war in Asia.
philpalx 1 year ago
@philpalx We had nukes the russians didnt. Macarthur didnt want a land war with china he wanted to drop a few nukes on them until they backed off
alienoverlord362 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 no, you are rigth
1caballeroaudaz1 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 couldnt have put it better myself
vanbismark 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362
not sure,
but if it happened,usa will probably be rule by a military junta not unlike burma.
hlimkb 1 year ago
@hlimkb No i was just saying the poloticians should listen to their generals
alienoverlord362 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362
unless u are prepare to suffer and inflict heavy casualties including using wmd in post ww2, russia n china is a no no.
I think that harry truman view.
hlimkb 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 P-O-L-I-T-I-C-I-A-N-S.
Supermassively 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@alienoverlord362
"If we went into the U.S.S.R. straight through Germany like Patton wanted and straight through North Korea into china like macarthur wanted we would have no problems right now... Am I wrong?"
-- We would still have an Islamonazi problem, but nothing a few heavy bombers couldn't take care of real quick.
bw01a 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@alienoverlord362
If we went into the U.S.S.R. straight through Germany like Patton wanted and straight through North Korea into china like macarthur wanted we would have no problems right now... Am I wrong?"
-- We would still have an islamonazi problem, but nothing a few heavy bombers couldn't take care of real quick.
bw01a 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 True that.
Supermassively 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Supermassively they fuck up everything
alienoverlord362 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362
Yes
homeworld1983 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 buddy you are 100% correct, my grandfather, who served in WWII, was all for following Patton, and he wasnt the only one that backed him, but the general who survived 2 world wars, somehow dies in a car crash, hmm sounds odd to me...
ww2man1939 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362
son you are mad
you are perfect example of a person to be used for mine clearing
SMACKTARDS 1 year ago
@SMACKTARDS U would communist scum
alienoverlord362 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362 Very wrong. 0/10, Mr troll.
pigsdofly6 1 year ago
@alienoverlord362
yeah, but its fun troll on on russians who still think there country is what it used to be
wantedman1000 1 year ago