An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
ok, heres the deal with perpetual motion, it IS possible, HOWEVER, you need a totaly frictionless environment.that means it cant be touching anything, not even air. it must be in a vaccuum.there also must be no magnetic forces at work. therefore, it is impossible to generate electricity with it,because as soon as you try,it looses energy.free energy is possible, in the sence that you don't have to pay for it,make a freakin windmill and stick it on your roof,it is the only "free" energy possible.
@rulz492 I quite like the way you phrased 1), that was what I was trying to say. however, I question how temperature matters, could you explain for me?
@coatduck It's just a way of expressing the laws of thermodynamics. The first law is the conservation of energy (i.e. that it cannot be created or destroyed). This law means that no mechanical perpetual motion can occur. However, without the second law (heat cannot spontaneously move from a cold location to a hot location) you might be able to extract the massive heat energy contained in, say, the atmosphere... Essentially, even in the simplest systems, perpetual motion is completely impossible.
@thewalkingdutchman1 You are right Leonardo Da Vinci is not a wise man. I'm sure no one would dare to argue with you about that. Think a little deeper before opening a pie hole full of wisdom.
@johnstarr2001 It was not my intention to say that Leonardo Da Vinci wasn't a wise man but my opinion is that is wasn't wise to think you can get something out of noting.
@thewalkingdutchman1 Actually, Leonardo Da Vinci correctly concluded the perpetual motion was impossible several hundred years before conservation of energy was understood as a mathematical law.
The reason that this perpetual motion machine would never work is due to the fundamental forces of electromagnetism and gravity. These forces working together cause the atoms in the metal balls, the tubes they roll in and the wheel's axle to rub against each other. This results in what is commonly referred to as friction. No matter how smooth or well greased these surfaces were they would still do work on each other. Any energy that was originally introduced will be converted to something else.
Cool vid. Does anyone know whether DaVinci himself thought that perpetual motion was possible? I actually kind of doubt that he did. His inventions show at least an intuitive understanding of conservation laws, though he did draw some impossible things.
Unfortunately, it would spin longer without the balls.
With balls included, the best case scenario with everything in balance there would be no positive force to continue the spin. The forces would equal out to zero.
it is possible provided that the ball rolls to the other side to push the wheel down before the wheel actually stops. I think use of magnets will make this possible.
Interesting, I think this had another intended purpose. where could I get a drawing of this it is hard to see in the animation. Thank you, by the way good animation.
Apparently after investigating perpectual motion, da Vinci said that others that try to create perpectual motion machines can "take their place with the alchemists"
Since all that it takes to obtain perpetual motion is to exceed the effects of friction and drag, and to equal the original force that started the machine.. It doesn't seem all that impossible. Maybe there will be some way to negate friction with material used. Maybe a way to keep energy in the system by directing spent energy back to the actuating device.
@WhatElseExceptNature From a macroscopic point of view, isn't the universe a perpetual motion machine? Since matter can't be created or, theoretically, destroyed. Matter used for one thing is eventually recycled and the process continues until, theoretically, it can be returned for the same use. Thinking of the universe as one system or, as it is a collection of systems. Also, isn't Earth's water cycle a good example of natural 'perpetual motion'?
@ZechsMerquise73 Earth's water cycle is indeed perfect, but not in the way you were saying. A machine can be perfect when there is no friction - just swing one pendulum and it will keep on moving, transferring energy. That's impossible.
I agree the matter theory (can't be destroyed or created) is near perfect, but not perfect. If it is, it would be able to answer this question: "How did matter originate in the beginning of the universe?" It must come from something.
@ZechsMerquise73 And according to scientists, the beginning of the universe is undefined, which means when dealing with sciences of the universe, we assume there was no another universe or anything before that - the beginning of our universe was the 1st point in the universe, period. If that's so true, how do you explain the sudden presence of matter out of nowhere? If matter cannot be created, then the scientist theory is wrong. Either one, I am sure. How did matter come in the 1st place?
@ZechsMerquise73 I conclude that the universe is indeed a perpetual motion machine, but how will then you explain the presence of matter in the 1st place in the beginning of the universe.
Water cycle is a good example, but isn't there some energy lost?
Also, @dasmater1 's comment clearly concludes my arguement. There is always friction, no matter what. It is thus impossible to create a machine with friction. And friction is everywhere. Even in the universe.
@ZechsMerquise73 Last thing, when I agreed the universe and Earth's water cycles were perfect machines, I agreed they were perfect machines as a WHOLE. This video shows one object being a perfect machine, which is impossible.
For instance, the universe is a perfect machine, but is, let's say, the transferring of energy from the sun to Earth? No, because energy is always lost due to radiation. It is not perfect in transferring the energy to Earth. As a whole though, Sun always transfers -a PM
Free energy has been here for a while ,But Millions are spend in supressing that information,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be part of the revolution!
@goose2goose2 Have you seen any of my other videos? And yes i have plenty of things that actually work, i am an inventor but i don't have to explain myself to some cyber asshole like you
@OtagoMark they dont move up and down by themselves you idiot the ones at the other end are farther from the center meaning they are heavier and the other ones are closer to the center making them lighter. This would spin for a while but not forever.
@NebunLaCap That why you nutters get fooled by these machines... you only look at one small part of it. The balls a a whole are moving up and down by themselves, powering each other so to speak
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But Millions are spend in supressing that information,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!
So there are no coincidences?.....that shape is similar to a popular Crop Circle, then you add Divine Geometry and Leonardo Davinci to the equation of Perpetual motion in the Universe... interesting....
I wonder what the leverage force is compared to the force it takes to lift the ball weights.Leverage seems to be the key thing in most designs I have seen.
Nice design of course, but the design is flawed a little...I do think if the design was altered to return the ball weight to center balance point sooner..it just might work?
Possibly increase the leverage factor to be a lot greater?
I love the design simply because its fun to look at and hell if you'd make it into a commercial product, obviously powered by outside energy instead of it perpetually moving out of its own, it could be the next lavalamp or electric ball thingy. Shit, i should patent something like that.
I invented a breakthrough energy source which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of conservation of energy. I am looking for $30 000 fora prototype and for $3M for patents. Making a 15 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of the energy produced yearly about $10 000.
The fact that da Vinci couldn't come up with perpetual motion, should let everyone else out there know that these "over unity" motors plastered all over youtube that are built in some guys garage are also FAKE!
I invented a breakthrough source of energy which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena that violate the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
It is true that in a perfect frictionless world the above device may rotate continously. But this is exactly why no power can be extracted from this system, because generating power requires & has friction. you try to spin a magnetic disk in air its easy, but you spin the same magnetic disk inside coil to generate electricity it gets really hard! because you have to do work to generate power.
to those who may not understand why this device wont continuously work, allow me to explain:
to spin this from start a push is needed. that push spins it for some time using above process but even a tiny amount of friction is needed to gradually slow the movement of disk to a point that small balls do not get to enough height to fall down to the other side, which causes the disk to eventually stop.
The key to the concept is "he was investigating the possibility of perpetual motion." Since it is not possible, he moved on as have all others with any brains.
It is fascinating that however complex the system is, the final analysis always shows no PM is possible.
One of the factors that makes this one sum to zero is the un intuitive fact that each ball spends more time on the left than on the right. This results in there being more balls on the left, which then balance the greater leverage of the falling balls on the right.
Is life a perpetual motion, that is in motion or at rest? Meaning if death is only in life, then there is no such thing as perpetual, if life exists after death, then perpetual does exists. I wonder then can atoms be totally destroyed?
yes they can. they can be converted into energy rmember?
E = mc^2
still you might say, you cant make that energy dissapear and about that you might be right but, in that case the question becomes: if you let the energy trasform bach into matter will it be the exact same matter?
I never understood E=mc^2 , unless there is a demonstration ( atomic bomb?) . So what i understand - the 'you' does not change but the body change ? And if the 'you' body dies and enters once again his past life( body), is this "you" the same? The question will be about time and memory ? :)
A. 1. maybe, if they can figure out the physical structures in our brain that make up or keep memories alive/stored.
A.2. computer memory is no different from you writing something on a paper, or more simply, putting dots on the paper to indicate something. example: binary code, 1=on, 2=off
you can do the same on paper.
HOWEVER you cannot recreate the way memory works on paper. not in this way.
???E=mc^2 doesnt mean you can convert matter into energy, it means there is an equivalence, ie a certain amount of mass is equivalent to a certain energy.
no, this woudln't work. the work done by the ball bearing rolling down ont he right and supposedly pushing the device down (clockwise), is offset by the work needed to lift the ball bearing's up on the left side. even if you assume the axle is frictionless it wouldn't work. the gravity pull on the right side is countered by the gravity pull on the left side.
ok. we need space stations with giant coils of wire (diameter greater than the diameter of the earth) and we position these space stations along the path the earth takes when it orbits the sun. free energy created by gravity. we can live on the space stations permanently. this is a more realistic pan (and it would work better) than the plan in this vid.
but as the eqn for attraction between two bodies is dependant on the mass of both bodies, we would reduce the mass of the sol3(by getting the raw materials for the space stations) and therefore reduce the attraction between the sol and sol.3. and it should be okay.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Believe it not viewers Physicist, Scientist, Artist, Engineer 'Leonardo Da Vinci' have invented the first free energy device which is just a home generator consumes no energy. Soon or later vehicles today will instead run on free energy rather than petrol, gas or oil responsible for the air pollution in this world.
Hey!, leonardo!!!... here's a good proposition. Actually build this thing and get it to work right producing "free energy", then bring it to me, i'll pay you a million bucks, cash!!, and then i'll go inmediatly to general electric and sell it to those guys for about... let me think.... 1000 times more.
this is totally a fail. two balls are not going to lift 3 of the same weight. DaVinci, you fail hard. Yes, my comment takes into account that one of the 6 balls is sitting "effectively" in limbo in the center near the axis
That and the fact that the whole device will stop due to the friction generated at the hinge in the centre from the rotation. The only thing left mentioning, in Da Vinci's favor is the continuation of momentum, which will eventually fail as well.
Still get friction between two surfaces in space, only you don't get gravity. Besides there are easier ways to generate power in outer space solar being one of them.
If you would do this in space, then you would not only have the same problem as on earth (equelibrium on both sides), but also the fact that the lack of gravity would ruin the machines basic principle.
if perpetual motion isn't possible then explain how the electrons in an atom are powered.also explain how gravity disappears when they make a nano machine.the laws of physics are seriously flawed.
neil young is busy right now converting a 59 lincoln to run on electric.instead of plugging it in to recharge it you plug it in to power your house.
neil needs our support right now as much as the world needs his.please go to lincvolt and check it out.
The onus is on you to explain to us how perpetual motion IS possible,it is not on us to tell you why it is not, the simplest physics you can learn tells us how it is NOT possible, if you think this Neil Young person knows better than every physicist that has ever lived i think you need to look more closely at this claims, he is either fooling himself or fooling you.
Not to disagree with you- you're right-, but what do you think happened when it was perposed that the earth was not flat? Or when we disproved the geocentric theory? When we realised gravity? People surely said the same thing you are now. The discoverers of these common truths were going up against almost every scientist who had ever lived.
@goose2goose2 Yawn..go away...another typical yank presuming everything revolves around him and his country - number 1, i'm not american and number 2 ,i couldn't give a shit about politics
Atoms are at a different scale to ball bearings. There are in the order of 1000,000,000,000,000 atoms in a ball bearing so things work differently. At the human scale, effects like friction sap energy from a system. At the atomic level the concept of friction is meaningless, atoms don't 'rub'.
If you like, what keeps the electron going is that there is no friction. However, if energy is extracted from an atom then something will give, such as electrons dropping into a lower energy orbitals.
Electrons are a subatomic particle that have a charge. They are also interacting with something called PROTONS. It's very much like magnets interacting in a cool little machine. But they dont interact that way forever. They arent "powered" forever...
Perpetual motion is the natural order of things....something put into motion will stay that way until made to stop by another force. The promlem is on a large scale friction comes into play as well as other forces....Also a perpetual movement device would cease being perpetual once you took its energy away to power something else....Now...zero point energy is viable if someone can find a way to harness it...but that is a different thing entirely
Electrons are not perpetual, energy eventually dissipates and they will eventually break bonds, find new nucleus etc. Nothing is perpetual, but when you are at that scale it a neutrons halflife is 22 trillion years, in that time it loses half it's energy. The mean life of an electron is 10 ^ 39 years. So these are not perpetual motion machines, they eventually loose there energy.
Electrons are not perpetual, energy eventually dissipates and they will eventually break bonds, find new nucleus etc. Nothing is perpetual, but when you are at that scale it a neutrons halflife is 22 trillion years, in that time it loses half it's energy. The mean life of an electron is 10 ^ 39 years. So these are not perpetual motion machines, they eventually loose there energy.
@ez3usx2 Your not talking about old Shakey are you? I mean, I knew he was working on some new tunes, but I didn't know he was working on a perpetual motion machine. News to me.
@ez3usx2 Nice to meet someone with a brain. Perpetual Motion is indeed possible. (Stardrive, vedoder eu answers your questions). And I'll take on ANY physicist denying it.
thank you zlovering for replying to me. but i still dont understand why the moon is moving away. zoemarks has given a really good explanation that i think makes sense. anyway this machine is still a nice idea. praps a motorised one would make a million dollars.
What if instead of balls you used a liquid that was magnetic (Ferro fluid), and had two permamnet magnets one on one side of the wheel to pull the fluid towards the centre of the wheel sooner and on the other side to pull away from the centre sooner?
i have thot of the same thing, id really like to try it. I know what you mean, possible that using the ferro fluid could keep it off balance and actually perpetuate speed, like an ice skater pulling the arms in.
It would stand still, because the wieght of the balls near the center will equal the wieght of the ball toward the outside. For it to work you would have to fool with how the inside is contoured as it turns they would have to adjust to keep it off balance. I always have like the off balance wheel though. Flywheels or much more efficient. The real probelms isnt making energy, we have lots of it; the problem is storing it. I have always been for massive compressed air tanks and jet engines.
Compressing air for energy recovery is one of the most inefficient means known to man. Tremendous amounts of heat are lost in the compression process.
That is a conventional compressor. I know when demand is high for power; the energy companies need to have jet engines make power for a period of time until they are able to slowly start another dam turbine. jet engines are extremely efficient, but very costly and cant be used all the time for that reason. I just think they should store the compressed air that is emiited and reuse it.
even if there was no friction between the parts of the meganism himself it will stop after a while, because of friction with the air. Even the friction with the air is very small but it creates heat energy that finaly stops the 'Perpetium Mobile'
That darn friction always screwing us up. If there was no friction between a wheel and its axel then it could just spin forever.
Also, I know that there is probably a solid explanation for why this wouldn't work, but when something is in orbit around the earth, it isn't using any energy, right? So couldn't that energy be harnessed?
It's like if I knocked a billiard ball through a house of cards. While the cards are getting energy by the ball's motion, the ball is losing an equal amount of energy.
The cards are technically slowing the ball down, though not by very much. It's just because the masses are so different that the energy transfer doesn't seem apparent on the larger.
What I mean to say is: if energy were taken from an orbit, the body's speed would decrease, however slightly, and the orbit would collapse.
Hi i saw the coment about harnessing the moons orbit and it made me thing that, the moon drives the tides and there are already tidal generators. Is the moon slowing down?
No...., but the first law of Newton says: Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion..,. UNLESS AN EXTERNAL FORCE IS APPLIED TO IT.
no? i did have a look on the internet and they say that the moon is slowing down. but i dont understand why it is moving out. if it is slowing shouldnt it be moving in?
The father an object is away from the body it is orbiting the slower it travels. For example, satellites in geosynchronous orbit (e.g. GPS satellites) travel very slowly compared to low earth orbit (LEO) satellites.
You are not quite correct, for the wrong reasons. The moon is speeding up, due to a transfer of Earth's rotational momentum to the Moon's orbital momentum as tidal friction slows the Earth's rotation. That increase in the Moon's speed is causing it to slowly recede from Earth (about 4 cm per year), increasing its orbital period & the length of a month as well.
I can't see my original comment. Can't recall what it was about. Let me guess what you wanted to know.
You may be confusing revolving and rotation.
The moon rotates around the earth once every 27.3 days and revolves on its axis once every 27.3 days.
The moon is moving away from earth at rate of about 40mm per year. Not sure if this will effect the rate of revolution, but the rate of rotation will get longer.
Gravity is an external force. The gravity of Earth (including its oceans and liquid core) do affect the moon. This is why the moon is tidally locked to earth.
This thing will never work because there's no way to create enery as we know in our 3 dimensional space. If someone comes up with new ideas of energy from other dimensions that are not visible to us, I can understand and listen what he says.
if anyone thinks, this is going to work, i just can tell you: use your brain man, this thing is as efficient as a normal wheel of a bike, without balls in it, if you spin this thing in that video, it will stop after a short time, because of the friction, like a wheel of a bike does, the weight the balls put on the wheel is the same on the left, as on the right side, actually this thing is less efficient than a wheel of a bike, because, at some points, there is more weight on the left side xDDDDD
But like many other are stating, theres no need to try to create a practical perpetual machine using gravity, when theres already been well developed methods of using other energy sources like solar power and wind power
He never did get it to work. Nobody ever does. Even with all the weights being equal in all parts of the system, there's the added problem of friction between the wheel and the hub, and the balls rolling in the tube. The Unbalanced Wheel effect will never work, because it's never unbalanced.
Sorry ,aber das kann nicht funkzionieren.Wie man deutlich sehen kann rollen hier die kugeln auf der linken seite berg auf??? Wie soll das den gehen???
Kein problem, entschuldigung meine deutsch ist nicht so gut. Iche verstande dat diese maschine kann nicht funkzionieren, es ist ein animation, das ist alles.
The idea with this and other unbalanced wheel machines is that as the weights move away from the center, they increase the leverage and torque on one side. The problem is that as the weights move away from the center, they also move away from each other. You end up with fewer weights on the side you are trying to make heavier. As the weights on the other side move toward the center they bunch up together and their combined weight evens out the leverage on the other side. Won't work.
there is no need to create perpetual motion machines. Farmers get free electricity when the water running in the creek turns the water wheel connected to an electric motor. The earth already has inexhaustible energy sources like wind, solar and water. Fuel cells in water-powered cars are already efficient enough to yield hydrogen capable of greater power than required in the electrolysis process.
So true. I've been wondering why everyone wants to put a label on it and compete for a myth. It doesn't matter because the earth will never exhaust it's energy resources. Sometimes eccentricity incorrectly misplaces common sense in people's minds.
But anyway, back on topic, The diagram above works, if you want your engine to be running about 3 rpm. If you were to put that thing into any kind of speed or practical use, centrifugal force would hold the ball bearings to the walls and not allow them to continue rotating the wheel. Best case scenario is the wheel only has one slow ass speed.
This video is just awesome..
But If you want more about perpetual motion...
Just goto Google, search for "Top Magnetic Generator" ...
Click the First Result (Skip the Advertisements)
DanielBrown89 3 weeks ago
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
peopledick 3 months ago
ok, heres the deal with perpetual motion, it IS possible, HOWEVER, you need a totaly frictionless environment.that means it cant be touching anything, not even air. it must be in a vaccuum.there also must be no magnetic forces at work. therefore, it is impossible to generate electricity with it,because as soon as you try,it looses energy.free energy is possible, in the sence that you don't have to pay for it,make a freakin windmill and stick it on your roof,it is the only "free" energy possible.
coatduck 6 months ago 2
@coatduck While what you say is kind of true perpetual motion is actually impossible. Thermodynamics:
1) You can't win, you can only break even.
2) You can only break even at absolute zero ( 0K or -273.13C ).
3) You can't get to absolute zero.
rulz492 5 months ago
@rulz492 I quite like the way you phrased 1), that was what I was trying to say. however, I question how temperature matters, could you explain for me?
coatduck 5 months ago
@coatduck It's just a way of expressing the laws of thermodynamics. The first law is the conservation of energy (i.e. that it cannot be created or destroyed). This law means that no mechanical perpetual motion can occur. However, without the second law (heat cannot spontaneously move from a cold location to a hot location) you might be able to extract the massive heat energy contained in, say, the atmosphere... Essentially, even in the simplest systems, perpetual motion is completely impossible.
rulz492 5 months ago
A wise man wouldn't even spend ten seconds on the perpetual motion machine knowing you can't get something out of nothing.
thewalkingdutchman1 7 months ago
@thewalkingdutchman1 You are right Leonardo Da Vinci is not a wise man. I'm sure no one would dare to argue with you about that. Think a little deeper before opening a pie hole full of wisdom.
johnstarr2001 5 months ago
@johnstarr2001 It was not my intention to say that Leonardo Da Vinci wasn't a wise man but my opinion is that is wasn't wise to think you can get something out of noting.
thewalkingdutchman1 5 months ago
@thewalkingdutchman1 Actually, Leonardo Da Vinci correctly concluded the perpetual motion was impossible several hundred years before conservation of energy was understood as a mathematical law.
chrisofnottingham 4 months ago
@chrisofnottingham really? Thanks, i didn't know that :D
thewalkingdutchman1 4 months ago
Yes morons, we know it won't work. Go make yourselves feel better on another video. Nice animation work Paulie! Ignore the mouth breathers.
TheJelloSheriff 7 months ago
The reason that this perpetual motion machine would never work is due to the fundamental forces of electromagnetism and gravity. These forces working together cause the atoms in the metal balls, the tubes they roll in and the wheel's axle to rub against each other. This results in what is commonly referred to as friction. No matter how smooth or well greased these surfaces were they would still do work on each other. Any energy that was originally introduced will be converted to something else.
theappropriation 7 months ago
in the words of my drill sergeant "Do it."
spencegame 7 months ago
Cool vid. Does anyone know whether DaVinci himself thought that perpetual motion was possible? I actually kind of doubt that he did. His inventions show at least an intuitive understanding of conservation laws, though he did draw some impossible things.
phthisicy 8 months ago
hmmm, add a few magnets and some copper wire and generate electricity as well i believe.....
zendishwasher2 8 months ago
Unfortunately, it would spin longer without the balls.
With balls included, the best case scenario with everything in balance there would be no positive force to continue the spin. The forces would equal out to zero.
BallinMafia 8 months ago
it is possible provided that the ball rolls to the other side to push the wheel down before the wheel actually stops. I think use of magnets will make this possible.
linminhtoo 9 months ago
Could it possibly work if the curves were more acute and closer to the center, just saying
SynthOmega 9 months ago
Interesting, I think this had another intended purpose. where could I get a drawing of this it is hard to see in the animation. Thank you, by the way good animation.
Thewizzardof9 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
tudo sobre a arte!!!! faça uma visita!!
marciocarneiro.yolasite.com
cursodepinturamarciocarneiro.blogspot.com
rickheber21 11 months ago
If you could shoot a bullet 25 times the speed of sound on, quite a height then it would go on for ever ;D
But thats the only possibility of something perpetual. I'm serious, its just not possible
Pyanapple 11 months ago
I'd say you did good. I don't know why these guys are being assholes.
chelseagle 11 months ago
this is feasable to be honest
kickassman66 11 months ago
Apparently after investigating perpectual motion, da Vinci said that others that try to create perpectual motion machines can "take their place with the alchemists"
djehuty13 1 year ago
=(1(CollinCreatedCollinDueCyborg16-25AllPercentLoyaltoCollin--SOUND)1)= --
DivineNucleus 1 year ago
Well i cant say thats the best way to do it. Constant friction would kill the "motion" pretty quick
Dasmaster1 1 year ago
Brilliant video! Science is the best!
WhatElseExceptNature 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Astonishing discoveries about Tesla electricity in videos "Tesla and cold electricity" by HorizonDelta
HorizonDelta 1 year ago
I don't think it'd work , there's more weight on the right than left, and it is not close enough to the center
TheKaos90 1 year ago
no comment(stupid)
milenica0208 1 year ago
If DaVinci could only see how we draw things today.
ourtrashcans 1 year ago
Since all that it takes to obtain perpetual motion is to exceed the effects of friction and drag, and to equal the original force that started the machine.. It doesn't seem all that impossible. Maybe there will be some way to negate friction with material used. Maybe a way to keep energy in the system by directing spent energy back to the actuating device.
ZechsMerquise73 1 year ago
@ZechsMerquise73 No air, no atmosphere, no gravity. Perhaps then. Which is by far, impossible. Or so it seems...
WhatElseExceptNature 1 year ago
@WhatElseExceptNature From a macroscopic point of view, isn't the universe a perpetual motion machine? Since matter can't be created or, theoretically, destroyed. Matter used for one thing is eventually recycled and the process continues until, theoretically, it can be returned for the same use. Thinking of the universe as one system or, as it is a collection of systems. Also, isn't Earth's water cycle a good example of natural 'perpetual motion'?
ZechsMerquise73 1 year ago
@ZechsMerquise73 Earth's water cycle is indeed perfect, but not in the way you were saying. A machine can be perfect when there is no friction - just swing one pendulum and it will keep on moving, transferring energy. That's impossible.
I agree the matter theory (can't be destroyed or created) is near perfect, but not perfect. If it is, it would be able to answer this question: "How did matter originate in the beginning of the universe?" It must come from something.
WhatElseExceptNature 1 year ago
@ZechsMerquise73 And according to scientists, the beginning of the universe is undefined, which means when dealing with sciences of the universe, we assume there was no another universe or anything before that - the beginning of our universe was the 1st point in the universe, period. If that's so true, how do you explain the sudden presence of matter out of nowhere? If matter cannot be created, then the scientist theory is wrong. Either one, I am sure. How did matter come in the 1st place?
WhatElseExceptNature 1 year ago
@ZechsMerquise73 I conclude that the universe is indeed a perpetual motion machine, but how will then you explain the presence of matter in the 1st place in the beginning of the universe.
Water cycle is a good example, but isn't there some energy lost?
Also, @dasmater1 's comment clearly concludes my arguement. There is always friction, no matter what. It is thus impossible to create a machine with friction. And friction is everywhere. Even in the universe.
WhatElseExceptNature 1 year ago
@ZechsMerquise73 Last thing, when I agreed the universe and Earth's water cycles were perfect machines, I agreed they were perfect machines as a WHOLE. This video shows one object being a perfect machine, which is impossible.
For instance, the universe is a perfect machine, but is, let's say, the transferring of energy from the sun to Earth? No, because energy is always lost due to radiation. It is not perfect in transferring the energy to Earth. As a whole though, Sun always transfers -a PM
WhatElseExceptNature 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy has been here for a while ,But Millions are spend in supressing that information,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be part of the revolution!
buchananfibbing 1 year ago
Perpetual motion will happen when true invisibility and true anti-gravity happen. Pack a lunch....
OregonDARRYL 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yawn...what else do you have to waste our time with ?
Do you have anything that actually works?
Anyting at all that might actually help people produce energy? No?
I didn't think so...
goose2goose2 1 year ago
@goose2goose2 Have you seen any of my other videos? And yes i have plenty of things that actually work, i am an inventor but i don't have to explain myself to some cyber asshole like you
paulie1982 1 year ago 45
@paulie1982 has this ever been teseted????? If it works I will build one for myself
NebunLaCap 1 year ago
@NebunLaCap Ofcourse it won't work as shown you complete moron....
OtagoMark 1 year ago
@OtagoMark Shut up bitch lol! What you mean "as shown"
NebunLaCap 1 year ago
@NebunLaCap As shown in the video...since when do little balls move up and down by themselves? hahhaha
OtagoMark 1 year ago
@OtagoMark they dont move up and down by themselves you idiot the ones at the other end are farther from the center meaning they are heavier and the other ones are closer to the center making them lighter. This would spin for a while but not forever.
NebunLaCap 1 year ago
@NebunLaCap That why you nutters get fooled by these machines... you only look at one small part of it. The balls a a whole are moving up and down by themselves, powering each other so to speak
OtagoMark 1 year ago
@OtagoMark Right I didn't say this thing will keep going forever.
NebunLaCap 1 year ago
@NebunLaCap And I didnt say it wouldn't run a little... read the video title you moron
OtagoMark 1 year ago
@OtagoMark i dont know what ur talking about dude go somewhere and have fun with yourself
NebunLaCap 1 year ago
@NebunLaCap The perpetual idiot machine in the video that perpetually creates idiots .. its amazing, have you seen it?
OtagoMark 1 year ago
@paulie1982 agreed!
linminhtoo 9 months ago
@paulie1982 Does work for real?
LESBIANDINOSAURSWAG 2 months ago
@LESBIANDINOSAURSWAG No it doesn't work, Leonardo himself knew it wouldn't work
paulie1982 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi..not another yank ....I'm from norway....
too bad you have me confused with someone who gives
a shit aabout anyting you do...what an ego jerk..
do us all a favor...leave.
goose2goose2 1 year ago
@goose2goose2 Em, no i'm not leaving, this is my video, you leave
paulie1982 1 year ago 29
@paulie1982 done listne to these douches i think this is a pretty solid idea
pimpofdoom 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But Millions are spend in supressing that information,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!
polysemousncrk 1 year ago
(1(CollinCreatedHOMEWORKasSIGNmentloyaltoCollin--)1) --
DivineNucleus 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything they can to stop these
information. If you want a Free energy machine , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the
revolution!
slanderousndgs 1 year ago
(1(CollinCreatedElectromagneticdischargeimagingLoyaltoCollin--)1) --
DivineNucleus 1 year ago
So there are no coincidences?.....that shape is similar to a popular Crop Circle, then you add Divine Geometry and Leonardo Davinci to the equation of Perpetual motion in the Universe... interesting....
chejota 1 year ago
You know nothing of leverage...
MrAwsome514 1 year ago
@MrAwsome514 You know nothing of reading, did i say anywhere that it would work? All i have done is animated a machine
paulie1982 1 year ago 7
@paulie1982 Then why is it working in the animation...
MrAwsome514 1 year ago
I wonder what the leverage force is compared to the force it takes to lift the ball weights.Leverage seems to be the key thing in most designs I have seen.
Nice design of course, but the design is flawed a little...I do think if the design was altered to return the ball weight to center balance point sooner..it just might work?
Possibly increase the leverage factor to be a lot greater?
Just a thought
LegendaryThoughts 1 year ago
Must see "KOJIN TURBINE DRIVE SYSTEM" Its a totaly new gravity/centrifugal force motor unlike any other yet very simple
ivyinetbiz 1 year ago
I love the design simply because its fun to look at and hell if you'd make it into a commercial product, obviously powered by outside energy instead of it perpetually moving out of its own, it could be the next lavalamp or electric ball thingy. Shit, i should patent something like that.
Doppe1ganger 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I invented a breakthrough energy source which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of conservation of energy. I am looking for $30 000 fora prototype and for $3M for patents. Making a 15 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of the energy produced yearly about $10 000.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
henrykay01 1 year ago
The weight of the balls falling is the same weight plus inertia of the balls going up.
memormaplin 1 year ago
i bet if with a few small adjustment to the shape of the ball bearing housing this could work... everyone...get your tools
djseff1 1 year ago
The fact that da Vinci couldn't come up with perpetual motion, should let everyone else out there know that these "over unity" motors plastered all over youtube that are built in some guys garage are also FAKE!
jib1000 1 year ago
WOW THIS IS AMAZING
firesickle 1 year ago
I invented a breakthrough source of energy which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena that violate the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
henrykay01 1 year ago
this idyll with v gate and you mite just have sum thing
amia777 1 year ago
It is true that in a perfect frictionless world the above device may rotate continously. But this is exactly why no power can be extracted from this system, because generating power requires & has friction. you try to spin a magnetic disk in air its easy, but you spin the same magnetic disk inside coil to generate electricity it gets really hard! because you have to do work to generate power.
kousha8420 1 year ago
to those who may not understand why this device wont continuously work, allow me to explain:
to spin this from start a push is needed. that push spins it for some time using above process but even a tiny amount of friction is needed to gradually slow the movement of disk to a point that small balls do not get to enough height to fall down to the other side, which causes the disk to eventually stop.
kousha8420 1 year ago
The key to the concept is "he was investigating the possibility of perpetual motion." Since it is not possible, he moved on as have all others with any brains.
JRBeaman 1 year ago
ha! i had a dream of something jsut like this when i was little, amazing how these things often come in dreams
dullvoicereader 2 years ago
It is fascinating that however complex the system is, the final analysis always shows no PM is possible.
One of the factors that makes this one sum to zero is the un intuitive fact that each ball spends more time on the left than on the right. This results in there being more balls on the left, which then balance the greater leverage of the falling balls on the right.
chrisofnottingham 2 years ago
Is life a perpetual motion, that is in motion or at rest? Meaning if death is only in life, then there is no such thing as perpetual, if life exists after death, then perpetual does exists. I wonder then can atoms be totally destroyed?
dan020350 2 years ago
fermi national accelerator lab in Batavia IL broke atoms into parts for split seconds
deviropp 2 years ago
@deviropp Broken into parts, but did the parts disappear? When you say seconds do you mean the atoms came back together ?
dan020350 2 years ago
yes they came back. and by split seconds i mean like 1/1000000000ths of a second.
deviropp 2 years ago
yes they can. they can be converted into energy rmember?
E = mc^2
still you might say, you cant make that energy dissapear and about that you might be right but, in that case the question becomes: if you let the energy trasform bach into matter will it be the exact same matter?
aarschgezicht 1 year ago
I never understood E=mc^2 , unless there is a demonstration ( atomic bomb?) . So what i understand - the 'you' does not change but the body change ? And if the 'you' body dies and enters once again his past life( body), is this "you" the same? The question will be about time and memory ? :)
dan020350 1 year ago
about time yes but not memory. memory is something we do not know much about and it can certainly not be used in science.
aarschgezicht 1 year ago
1. Can science know how memory works? 2. Is the computer memory not science?
dan020350 1 year ago
1. I believe that eventually science will know how memory works.
2. very true, if you were talking about that sort of memory.
aarschgezicht 1 year ago
@aarschgezicht 1. good. 2. very good :)
dan020350 1 year ago
@dan020350
A. 1. maybe, if they can figure out the physical structures in our brain that make up or keep memories alive/stored.
A.2. computer memory is no different from you writing something on a paper, or more simply, putting dots on the paper to indicate something. example: binary code, 1=on, 2=off
you can do the same on paper.
HOWEVER you cannot recreate the way memory works on paper. not in this way.
TheRealDj2quick 1 year ago
1. good. 2. fair :)
dan020350 1 year ago
???E=mc^2 doesnt mean you can convert matter into energy, it means there is an equivalence, ie a certain amount of mass is equivalent to a certain energy.
daenumen 1 year ago
Energy is constant and you cannot produce it from nothing unless you steal it from other source
5kTrimmer 2 years ago
nao funciona
andrerds2 2 years ago
no, this woudln't work. the work done by the ball bearing rolling down ont he right and supposedly pushing the device down (clockwise), is offset by the work needed to lift the ball bearing's up on the left side. even if you assume the axle is frictionless it wouldn't work. the gravity pull on the right side is countered by the gravity pull on the left side.
kingbane2 2 years ago
Brilliant I love it.
calsonick 2 years ago
ok. we need space stations with giant coils of wire (diameter greater than the diameter of the earth) and we position these space stations along the path the earth takes when it orbits the sun. free energy created by gravity. we can live on the space stations permanently. this is a more realistic pan (and it would work better) than the plan in this vid.
LocustsAreSwarming 2 years ago
@LocustsAreSwarming This would slow down the earth, so it would fall towards the Sun.
ChrisKnott 2 years ago
but as the eqn for attraction between two bodies is dependant on the mass of both bodies, we would reduce the mass of the sol3(by getting the raw materials for the space stations) and therefore reduce the attraction between the sol and sol.3. and it should be okay.
LocustsAreSwarming 2 years ago
it cant move unti the numbers of balls on each side equal each other so that's the FLAW in this mechanism
hotboyfriend55 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Believe it not viewers Physicist, Scientist, Artist, Engineer 'Leonardo Da Vinci' have invented the first free energy device which is just a home generator consumes no energy. Soon or later vehicles today will instead run on free energy rather than petrol, gas or oil responsible for the air pollution in this world.
anold130 2 years ago
Hey!, leonardo!!!... here's a good proposition. Actually build this thing and get it to work right producing "free energy", then bring it to me, i'll pay you a million bucks, cash!!, and then i'll go inmediatly to general electric and sell it to those guys for about... let me think.... 1000 times more.
LAME!
tyrocl 2 years ago 2
you are right, except 'free energy' means solar, not magic pyramid power or perpetual motion machines.
xaoseph 2 years ago
Or wind/wave/whatever generates energy from an inexhaustible, non-polluting source.
Aaberg123 2 years ago
To bet it doesnt work ^^
RazielKain 2 years ago
this is totally a fail. two balls are not going to lift 3 of the same weight. DaVinci, you fail hard. Yes, my comment takes into account that one of the 6 balls is sitting "effectively" in limbo in the center near the axis
defectnine 2 years ago 10
defectnine, Da Vinci knew this would not work, he only drew plans for it, i thought it was a pretty cool machine so i animated it.
Check out my other video on him - Leonardo da Vinci: Science, engineering & inventions, i think you'll realise that he was no fool.
paulie1982 2 years ago 4
@defectnine Maybe he failed with this but think about helicopter he drawed.
tysiek123 1 year ago
@tysiek123 drew not drawed
wezdog1 1 year ago
@defectnine
That and the fact that the whole device will stop due to the friction generated at the hinge in the centre from the rotation. The only thing left mentioning, in Da Vinci's favor is the continuation of momentum, which will eventually fail as well.
reptilianshifter 1 year ago
@defectnine Heheh, you said balls.
NeptuneMS385 1 year ago
@defectnine Oh, so the tank, the helicopter and siege weaponry were all failures?
You sir, or madame, are an utter fool.
therandomexample 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i think that if the wheel itself was light enough and if the balls were really heavy, then this might have a chance of working
rotflmaopmpqxyz 2 years ago
no it won't. weight of the wheel doesn't matter because it's balanced on all sides.
happyguy82 2 years ago
there are 2 massive fakes, 1 leonardo di vinchi did not create that was invented by edward of summerset the 2nd marquis of worchester (1601-1667)
and number 2 the balls have no affect the reason it stops are the basic laws of friction
bandanasboizz 2 years ago
O.k so with all things been said, think out side the box, what about something that can do this in space and feed the power back to earth
legion2024 2 years ago
Still get friction between two surfaces in space, only you don't get gravity. Besides there are easier ways to generate power in outer space solar being one of them.
IdleWild999 2 years ago
If you would do this in space, then you would not only have the same problem as on earth (equelibrium on both sides), but also the fact that the lack of gravity would ruin the machines basic principle.
AFnord 2 years ago
some people should not be scientists.
naflodi 2 years ago
if perpetual motion isn't possible then explain how the electrons in an atom are powered.also explain how gravity disappears when they make a nano machine.the laws of physics are seriously flawed.
neil young is busy right now converting a 59 lincoln to run on electric.instead of plugging it in to recharge it you plug it in to power your house.
neil needs our support right now as much as the world needs his.please go to lincvolt and check it out.
@lincvolt
ez3usx2 2 years ago
Another conman eh?
The onus is on you to explain to us how perpetual motion IS possible,it is not on us to tell you why it is not, the simplest physics you can learn tells us how it is NOT possible, if you think this Neil Young person knows better than every physicist that has ever lived i think you need to look more closely at this claims, he is either fooling himself or fooling you.
paulie1982 2 years ago 6
Not to disagree with you- you're right-, but what do you think happened when it was perposed that the earth was not flat? Or when we disproved the geocentric theory? When we realised gravity? People surely said the same thing you are now. The discoverers of these common truths were going up against almost every scientist who had ever lived.
mwhite112393 2 years ago
@paulie1982 yawn..go away...we have enough republicans already.
goose2goose2 1 year ago
@goose2goose2 Yawn..go away...another typical yank presuming everything revolves around him and his country - number 1, i'm not american and number 2 ,i couldn't give a shit about politics
paulie1982 1 year ago
Atoms are at a different scale to ball bearings. There are in the order of 1000,000,000,000,000 atoms in a ball bearing so things work differently. At the human scale, effects like friction sap energy from a system. At the atomic level the concept of friction is meaningless, atoms don't 'rub'.
If you like, what keeps the electron going is that there is no friction. However, if energy is extracted from an atom then something will give, such as electrons dropping into a lower energy orbitals.
chrisofnottingham 2 years ago
Electrons are a subatomic particle that have a charge. They are also interacting with something called PROTONS. It's very much like magnets interacting in a cool little machine. But they dont interact that way forever. They arent "powered" forever...
gregory06 2 years ago
Perpetual motion is the natural order of things....something put into motion will stay that way until made to stop by another force. The promlem is on a large scale friction comes into play as well as other forces....Also a perpetual movement device would cease being perpetual once you took its energy away to power something else....Now...zero point energy is viable if someone can find a way to harness it...but that is a different thing entirely
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
@ez3usx2
Electrons are not perpetual, energy eventually dissipates and they will eventually break bonds, find new nucleus etc. Nothing is perpetual, but when you are at that scale it a neutrons halflife is 22 trillion years, in that time it loses half it's energy. The mean life of an electron is 10 ^ 39 years. So these are not perpetual motion machines, they eventually loose there energy.
JamesCizuz 1 year ago
@ez3usx2
Electrons are not perpetual, energy eventually dissipates and they will eventually break bonds, find new nucleus etc. Nothing is perpetual, but when you are at that scale it a neutrons halflife is 22 trillion years, in that time it loses half it's energy. The mean life of an electron is 10 ^ 39 years. So these are not perpetual motion machines, they eventually loose there energy.
JamesCizuz 1 year ago
electrons orbit around a proton. like a frictionless bearing. stored energy.
JayClarkTheShark 1 year ago
@ez3usx2 Your not talking about old Shakey are you? I mean, I knew he was working on some new tunes, but I didn't know he was working on a perpetual motion machine. News to me.
fudgicles 1 year ago
@ez3usx2 Nice to meet someone with a brain. Perpetual Motion is indeed possible. (Stardrive, vedoder eu answers your questions). And I'll take on ANY physicist denying it.
Nomasain 1 year ago
thank you zlovering for replying to me. but i still dont understand why the moon is moving away. zoemarks has given a really good explanation that i think makes sense. anyway this machine is still a nice idea. praps a motorised one would make a million dollars.
paulsenior2000 2 years ago
What if instead of balls you used a liquid that was magnetic (Ferro fluid), and had two permamnet magnets one on one side of the wheel to pull the fluid towards the centre of the wheel sooner and on the other side to pull away from the centre sooner?
EJK1986 2 years ago
i have thot of the same thing, id really like to try it. I know what you mean, possible that using the ferro fluid could keep it off balance and actually perpetuate speed, like an ice skater pulling the arms in.
foolphysics 2 years ago
It would stand still, because the wieght of the balls near the center will equal the wieght of the ball toward the outside. For it to work you would have to fool with how the inside is contoured as it turns they would have to adjust to keep it off balance. I always have like the off balance wheel though. Flywheels or much more efficient. The real probelms isnt making energy, we have lots of it; the problem is storing it. I have always been for massive compressed air tanks and jet engines.
foolphysics 2 years ago
Compressing air for energy recovery is one of the most inefficient means known to man. Tremendous amounts of heat are lost in the compression process.
ZoeMarks 2 years ago
That is a conventional compressor. I know when demand is high for power; the energy companies need to have jet engines make power for a period of time until they are able to slowly start another dam turbine. jet engines are extremely efficient, but very costly and cant be used all the time for that reason. I just think they should store the compressed air that is emiited and reuse it.
foolphysics 2 years ago
0.5mv²=mgh + Heat (by friction) +sound
lost of energy by heat and sound
So it never works in reality
even if there was no friction between the parts of the meganism himself it will stop after a while, because of friction with the air. Even the friction with the air is very small but it creates heat energy that finaly stops the 'Perpetium Mobile'
=)
MichaeljacksonAFG 2 years ago
leonardo, that rascal
extrapedestrian 2 years ago
That darn friction always screwing us up. If there was no friction between a wheel and its axel then it could just spin forever.
Also, I know that there is probably a solid explanation for why this wouldn't work, but when something is in orbit around the earth, it isn't using any energy, right? So couldn't that energy be harnessed?
gaarn4000 2 years ago
It's like if I knocked a billiard ball through a house of cards. While the cards are getting energy by the ball's motion, the ball is losing an equal amount of energy.
The cards are technically slowing the ball down, though not by very much. It's just because the masses are so different that the energy transfer doesn't seem apparent on the larger.
What I mean to say is: if energy were taken from an orbit, the body's speed would decrease, however slightly, and the orbit would collapse.
HelplessVictim 2 years ago
Yeah, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation!
gaarn4000 2 years ago
Hi i saw the coment about harnessing the moons orbit and it made me thing that, the moon drives the tides and there are already tidal generators. Is the moon slowing down?
paulsenior2000 2 years ago
No...., but the first law of Newton says: Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion..,. UNLESS AN EXTERNAL FORCE IS APPLIED TO IT.
That's why the moon don't lowing down ;)
MichaeljacksonAFG 2 years ago
no? i did have a look on the internet and they say that the moon is slowing down. but i dont understand why it is moving out. if it is slowing shouldnt it be moving in?
paulsenior2000 2 years ago
The father an object is away from the body it is orbiting the slower it travels. For example, satellites in geosynchronous orbit (e.g. GPS satellites) travel very slowly compared to low earth orbit (LEO) satellites.
zlovering 2 years ago
You are not quite correct, for the wrong reasons. The moon is speeding up, due to a transfer of Earth's rotational momentum to the Moon's orbital momentum as tidal friction slows the Earth's rotation. That increase in the Moon's speed is causing it to slowly recede from Earth (about 4 cm per year), increasing its orbital period & the length of a month as well.
ZoeMarks 2 years ago
thank you for that. will the moon eventually orbit the earth at the rate of one rotation per day? rsvp
paulsenior2000 2 years ago
I can't see my original comment. Can't recall what it was about. Let me guess what you wanted to know.
You may be confusing revolving and rotation.
The moon rotates around the earth once every 27.3 days and revolves on its axis once every 27.3 days.
The moon is moving away from earth at rate of about 40mm per year. Not sure if this will effect the rate of revolution, but the rate of rotation will get longer.
Hope that helps.
zzytrewq 2 years ago
Just realised why I couldn't find my original post. Doh! I changed my YouTube moniker last month.
You can send questions to me directly if you like. Cheers
ZoeMarks 2 years ago
Gravity is an external force. The gravity of Earth (including its oceans and liquid core) do affect the moon. This is why the moon is tidally locked to earth.
zlovering 2 years ago
The moon drives the tides of the sea and there are tidal generators now.
paulsenior2000 2 years ago
This thing will never work because there's no way to create enery as we know in our 3 dimensional space. If someone comes up with new ideas of energy from other dimensions that are not visible to us, I can understand and listen what he says.
serkantkar 2 years ago
if anyone thinks, this is going to work, i just can tell you: use your brain man, this thing is as efficient as a normal wheel of a bike, without balls in it, if you spin this thing in that video, it will stop after a short time, because of the friction, like a wheel of a bike does, the weight the balls put on the wheel is the same on the left, as on the right side, actually this thing is less efficient than a wheel of a bike, because, at some points, there is more weight on the left side xDDDDD
lanneistion 2 years ago
But like many other are stating, theres no need to try to create a practical perpetual machine using gravity, when theres already been well developed methods of using other energy sources like solar power and wind power
sesamestreetgang 2 years ago
If it's using external energy sources, it's not a perpetual motion machine ... and if it isn't, it's not a perpetual motion machine.
eedahl 2 years ago
He never did get it to work. Nobody ever does. Even with all the weights being equal in all parts of the system, there's the added problem of friction between the wheel and the hub, and the balls rolling in the tube. The Unbalanced Wheel effect will never work, because it's never unbalanced.
UnderManiac 2 years ago
Sorry ,aber das kann nicht funkzionieren.Wie man deutlich sehen kann rollen hier die kugeln auf der linken seite berg auf??? Wie soll das den gehen???
MfG
querdenker79 2 years ago
Kein problem, entschuldigung meine deutsch ist nicht so gut. Iche verstande dat diese maschine kann nicht funkzionieren, es ist ein animation, das ist alles.
paulie1982 2 years ago
The idea with this and other unbalanced wheel machines is that as the weights move away from the center, they increase the leverage and torque on one side. The problem is that as the weights move away from the center, they also move away from each other. You end up with fewer weights on the side you are trying to make heavier. As the weights on the other side move toward the center they bunch up together and their combined weight evens out the leverage on the other side. Won't work.
Firesprink72 2 years ago 2
the problem is that this isnt perpetual motion. it uses gravity an external energy source for motion. no different than pluging it into a wall outlet
shagythommy 2 years ago
Comment removed
Aestheticpassion 2 years ago
This animation is totally wrong
The idea of Da Vinci shows that balls
are moving in the same D shape and
the ball never does change towards
others shapes.
The only way that it works is using
Liquid mercury instead steel balls
proximu 2 years ago
even then it still won't work or we would already have it. just another variation of the "over-balanced wheel" idea
magicmouse69 2 years ago
there is no need to create perpetual motion machines. Farmers get free electricity when the water running in the creek turns the water wheel connected to an electric motor. The earth already has inexhaustible energy sources like wind, solar and water. Fuel cells in water-powered cars are already efficient enough to yield hydrogen capable of greater power than required in the electrolysis process.
skepticdude2 2 years ago 4
Tell that to the NEW WORLD ORDER... and your USA government ...
GeneralPeterson2010 2 years ago
Very good.
Too bad so many are trapped in a web chasing their tales while the answer is right here...
Hydrogen HHO
Geo-Thermal
Tidal
Wind
Solar
Take your pick....
Aquar1uZ 2 years ago 3
you left out nuclear fission, makes way more sense economically speaking than any of those.
electrosoccertux 2 years ago
So true. I've been wondering why everyone wants to put a label on it and compete for a myth. It doesn't matter because the earth will never exhaust it's energy resources. Sometimes eccentricity incorrectly misplaces common sense in people's minds.
officerstrickland 2 years ago
But anyway, back on topic, The diagram above works, if you want your engine to be running about 3 rpm. If you were to put that thing into any kind of speed or practical use, centrifugal force would hold the ball bearings to the walls and not allow them to continue rotating the wheel. Best case scenario is the wheel only has one slow ass speed.
sirsmorkmo 2 years ago
youre concerned about the speed of the wheel??? are you serious?! speed is not an issure, if the wheel move