Why are you trolling my videos. I'm not even talking about american's in my video. And I'm from Canada so I would probably be where I am, considering Canada is part of the commonwealth under the protection of the crown. Your ignorant because I didn't say guns are the issue, I said I don't understand why people think they have the right to take someone else's life. Smart one..
@dreamsxsilentx So without the US, you suspect that Germany wouldn't have bombed the UK out of existance. Also, without the US, the UK would have starved and ran out of bullets long before our entrance into the war. Did you ever check out the news stories from China and Canada about the dangers of knives? Should we ban all sharp objects because a mad man can use them in a way to murder tens of children? This is your argument against guns, and it just makes you sound ignorant on the subject.
@dlstb major trollz, you're just making yourself look stupid. this is about violence in general, but if you want to keep commenting go right ahead this is my last response.
This is a serious question. Have you never seen the news reports from China from when people go nuts and rampage elementary schools with knives?
March 23, 2010, man kills 8 and injures 5.
April 28, 2010, man stabs 28 children and 3 adults.
2008, a Chinese Canadian stabs man on greyhound and decapitates
If you still think guns are the problem... think about the fact that my car is a 4000 lb sledgehammer and missile combo. More are killed every year by cars than guns. >40,000 a year.
@dlstb honestly you must be an idiot. You have no read any of the comments or what I've talked about. So I'm not even going to comment on what you talked about. Get a brain.
@dreamsxsilentx It appears that you resort to calling names when you are proven to be a scared child. The problem isn't guns, like you say, it is people. So long as people are fallable and yet intelligent, mass murder will happen. Your mention of guns at the beginning of the video and your pseudo explanation that a person cannot do as much harm without a gun serves to show that you are afraid of guns. Truth is that a person can harm just as many people without a gun as with a gun.
Where do I think that I have the right to end some else's life? How about when they are an imminent threat to my life and/or the lives of my family? How about that for an answer Einstein? You have the right to defend yourself PERIOD. In fact, this is the most important right that we all have. Without it, one's life has no purpose.
@drj90210 "Killing, since when do people think they have the right to kill someone else. Really. [obviously excluding cases where you're in mortal danger]." that's pulled right from description dumbass.
@dreamsxsilentx I'll admit, I didn't read your description. However, it seems that your video is entirely different than your description, and it appears that you equate people who "go out and buy a gun" with killers. If this wasn't your intention, then perhaps you should rephrase yourself in the video because 100% of people who rated you obvioiusly heard the same thing that I heard (e.g. an ignorant rant against gun owners). Obviously killing is wrong: Hence laws against murder/manslaughter.
@drj90210 Everyone just flips out about guns. I say what I mean in my video. Oh well for you if you misinterpret that. I just mentioned that he got a gun to kill people. That's not equating gun owners with killers. It would appear that you're all the same ignorant though. Its a gun. Calm down. Why do you care if I don't like guns, you're not changing my opinion.
@dreamsxsilentx People do not murder because they believe that they have a "right" to do it. To suggest such a thing (as you did in your video) is idiotic. People kill because they are CRIMINALS and have an utter disregard for the law and contempt for human life. Few others kill because they are utterly insane. NOBODY goes out and kills just because they believe they have a RIGHT to do it. Laws against murder are quite clear; there are no specicial interest groups trying to legalize murder.
@drj90210 Lol I thought you had a problem about defending your life. What now that I made you look stupid because it was in my description the whole time you have to complain about something. FAIL. Dumbass
@dreamsxsilentx The only failure was on your part. Your video was utterly pointless, which is why not a single person gave you a thumbs up as a rating.
@drj90210 it shows me they're probably all American and got in a fuss when I mentioned guns in a way they feel makes them look bad. I can't help what videos you see with mine. It seems that videos people viewed before mine influenced their views. I barely even mention guns yet that's what everyone talks about. Ignorance is lack of knowledge you're ignorant about my video because you didn't read the description where I clarified before and you only take that ONE point of my video.
@dreamsxsilentx Do you have something against Americans? If it weren't for Americans, where would you and the world be? BTW, anyone who declares that the problem is in any way guns and not entirely the individual behind the gun is ignorant. Also, the idea that you can judge whether or not a person will commit a crime in the future is entirely false. It is in the realm of pre-crime from Minority Report and it is contradictory to the American law system of innocent until proven guilty.
I feel I have the right to kill another person in the event that that other person is treating my self, another loved one, another innocent person, or my USA!
That is why I am a proud gun owner, and take full advantage of my CCW license that my state offers
dude i dont get it are you arguing something or are you just asking questions? and also you can be upset about this all you want its not going to stop it, which i do suppose is unfortunate
I'm sorry that you feel that no one has the right to kill someone else. Im sorry if someone is trying to rape or kill me I am going to kill them.
Now ...I don't agree with going out and shooting up a mall or a school, but that is 100% different than self defense. Just remember that! Oh and a side note... we aren't the only animals out there that go out and kill.
@BriarRoseThorne you make yourself looked stupid when you don't read the other comments or listen to what I said. I said that self defense is a different scenario. So don't try and make yourself look all clever. I don't need to remember that because I'm aware of that. In a situation where its you or them people will make the obvious decision. Animals do a lot of things does that mean we should do all of those things. That's a well thought out argument.
@dreamsxsilentx theres a very simple answer to the question in your video and its that people who decide to kill someone else without an apparent reason arent thinking... in fact they probably have some kind of mental illness
@NRAman123 Why does that have to do with anything. There's a difference between defending yourself and then going for the kill.
Everyone just likes to pick that point. Did I mention those in the video. NO. Want to know why? because that's a different situation. If you're in a life or death clearly a person would try to save themselves. I'm talking about unnecessary killing and just walking up and killing someone because you can.
@dreamsxsilentx and do you really think the banning of guns is gonna stop them, all thats gonna do is ensure that criminals have innocent victims because law abiding citizens are the only ones who will obey the law.
@NRAman123 Again I never mentioned the banning of guns. I talk about people feeling they have the right to kill someone for no reason. You're putting words in my mouth. It's not my problem you don't have a valid argument.
You said that guns aren't the answer (in a round about way I suppose) and you are right, but I would propose that taking guns away would not be the answer either. It just goes down to the human beings involved. The problem is not with the tools that one uses to kill, but with the person in the first place. The problem is that they have the desire to kill in the first place. The only way that can be fixed is by either complete and absolute control or by a change of heart.
I understand that it is irritating for people to start to go after something in your video that it is not really about. I am not sure if I said so earlier, but the reason people jump on the gun issue is that it is in their minds a right to defense and not killing that the gun pertains to. When you bring up guns they feel as though you are threatening that right despite the fact that your video is clearly about preserving life.
The line cannot be a gray area. It must be a firm unyielding line that all can see. Not everyone has to agree on it as there will always be those who disregard what is blatantly right and wrong. You want to know where the line is to be drawn. The only way to answer that is to answer the question, "Who decides what is right and wrong?" People will always disagree on this, but we can reasonably conclude that there is one answer as there is that moral law that we all "feel."
(continued) harder than you can imagine to not defend yourself if you have the presence of mind to think about it. Chances are, though, that you will not have the presence of mind. Also, the reason people jump on the gun part as I did is because that is the one thing in your video that would directly affect them. We do not have the right to take another's life, but it certain concessions must be made to take into account that there are people out there who simply don't care that they do not have
@8onebaddude8 I've never held a gun before in my life, and I have handled knives in the sense of cooking, but I'm pretty good with one. However, I think it would be easier for me, an average joe when it comes to guns, to simply pick up a gun and shoot someone killing them vs. using a knife to kill them. Not that I would. I understand that there's a lot to a gun, but ironically enough watch tv makes it easy to know the basics of shooting a gun. I probably couldn't load a mag
@8onebaddude8 but that's besides the point. I used guns as an example the overall is violence and killing. Yes, I understand that. But it's irritating that a lot of people just jump to a gun and pull it out to solve the problem. And in terms of protection the point i wanted to make is if everyone has a gun how safe are you really. It's almost the same as if no one did. Everyone is on the same level, just greater damage is dealt to both parties.
(continued) looked to be an old ice pick. It wasn't. It was a metal spike that he had used on several occasions. It would be inserted into the head right above the ear and then jostled around a bit. It was quick, effective and quiet. The spike itself is very easy to hide. I have no intention of killing anyone unless they become a threat to me, my family, or an obviously innocent person. If you want to pacifism that is fine. Actually I would admire you for that, but if you are attacked it will be
@8onebaddude8 The point that I wanted to make is that you don't just have the right to kill somebody. The example I used was of someone who just walked into a school and started killing people. I just don't understand when someone thinks its okay to kill other people because they're upset or feel entitled to. Fighting for your life is a different case. Knives have just as much potential, but are most harmful in hands of an expert, a gun in the hands of anyone is dangerous. Point and shoot.
@dreamsxsilentx I see what you mean, but I must disagree with the point and shoot. I have dealt with many sorts of guns before and I can tell you that it is harder for the average joe down the street to pick up a gun and shoot it at a target and hit it. First he has to know how to operate the gun and that in itself is problematic. Mishandle the gun and it is likely to jam as well. Poor ammo may cause a failure to fire and poor magazines may cause failure to feed. My point is not that they cannot
I watched your video and there is something I want to clear up. You make a valid point, but there is something that you miss. "You wouldn't inflict as much harm without it(gun)." This is not true. Others have brought up knives so will I. There are many who would disagree with me, but I assure you that knives and other weapons have just as much potential to do harm. Example: friend of mine was a firefighter in the military. His uncle had been a Green Beret in Vietnam. My friend pulled out what
@8onebaddude8 The point I made was not about guns in general it was about people killing. Its the opinion that our world has so much violence. I understand that majority of people feel violence is the answer. But I feel its often the first choice over self defense and/or other choices. There are instances where you need to protect yourself, but where do you draw the line.
@dreamsxsilentx that is an excellent question. The only way to answer that is to settle on a set of moral beliefs. We can all agree that there is something very wrong with killing, but what makes that wrong? Again, to answer that you have to go to a moral compass of sorts. People disagree on this. And honestly if someone ever does attack me I won't bother to defend my self. It would be wrong of me to, but if they decide to harm my loved ones I will respond with appropriate force. IMHO
@MoneyVSMetal All of you who write these kind of things on my video are the pinnacle of why people shouldn't have guns.
You do NOT have the right to exterminate someone because they are Muslim. Everyone is entitled to have their own religion and set of beliefs. If people choose to be muslim that's their prerogative.
To continue to my comment, there are people who go out and buy knives and go out and stab people. There are people who get serious road rage and use their 2 ton battering ram to take peoples lives. Should we ban cars? Should we ban knives? People are crazy bud, we can't do nothing about it. We have to defend ourselves from those who are crazy.
@Dp908 You all jump on the gun part. I said in general. I used a gun as an example. It makes no sense when you think of the logic. If everyone has guns in their home, than you arent that safe. Anyone can just bring a gun and shoot you before you even grab a gun. In another case, an individual can break into your home and steal your guns and commit several crimes. How would you feel being responsible for providing weapons to an individual who is "crazy". There's self defense, and then extremism.
@dreamsxsilentx Nobody is getting my firearms because they're under vault lock and key, unless the burgler will break into my house with die grinders with diamond cutting bits and blow torches. It has also been proven that an armed society is a polite society. Spite the liberal media you read, in the United States record has shown states with the least strict amount of gun control have lower crime. States with open carry, concealed carry with no license etc... have very little crime.
@Dp908 Well I can prove or disprove the validity of your claim. But all it takes is one irresponsible person. In the event of a emergency if your guns are truly under such lock and key you wouldn't be so protected. Use statistics not from the states and I would be more impressed. Records and statistics are always biased based on the sampler. In the end if everyone has a gun, then you're not as safe as you think. It would be almost as the same as everyone not having a gun or just having a knife.
@dreamsxsilentx Facts are facts. It has been proven on many occasions that states where citizens are free to exercise their RKBA (right to keep and bear arms) to the fullest extent are safer with lower crime. As far as my firearms being under lock and key, I mean when I'm away. The argument that the criminal could get the jump on you or take your gun away is not a very good simply because that rarely happens.
@Dp908 It's not that hard to find statistics to support ones point. If you look you can always find "facts" and "stats" to prove or disprove your point. At the end of the day this is my opinion on killing and weapons. I'm not going to change it, you don't have to agree with it. But its still here. This back and forth is getting juvenile.
I have a few problems here. I am a second amendment supporting, gun collecting, bullet casting, ammunition reloading, gun shooting American. I have a few firearms for home defense, the rest are for collecting purposes, or sporting purposes. I agree that we do not have the right to randomly take someones life, but under what circumstances? The bible says that its ok to take someones life in war, or in self defense. I stand by my right to take someones life if they try to harm me.
@gadfly450004 You're so extra. You take your whole second ammendment so literally and to the extreme. If everyone has a gun, how does that make you any safer. It would be the same as nobody having a gun, it's the same level of safety and protection. One person can just use a gun on another. And the fact is registered guns end up in the possession of criminals and used in illegal activities..What's the use of something meant to kill other than to kill, its not "protection'
Are you saying Neville Chamberlain was right by establishing "peace in our time"? Guns are necessary for self-dense of one's person and of the state. Funny how the Nazis did NOT invade Switzerland which unlike most countries in Europe has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in not only Europe but in all the world. And no it was NOT because Hitler had a respect for the rule of law.
For the record it is NOT "Thou shall not kill" it is "Thou shall not murder"
@gadfly450004 Did I say that, no so don't use words that I didn't. It's easy to twist someone's point to make it what you want. Gun's are not necessary. It's called using a MOUTH which GOD gave you to solve your problems. If you have an issue with someone you don't just shoot them. And were not talking about war because that's its own category. At the end of the day this is my youtube channel, and my opinion, if you don't like what I have to say TOUGH. Don't watch my videos. :P kthanksbye
It is called "self-defense"! Try reading some law at some point
It is scary that someone like would be accepted into a law school.
Do me a favor, stop reading Brady Gun Control Group press releases and help yourself to a history textbook. It is a little group of words called the 2nd Amendment.
It is sad that a young student like you seems to have the adopted the opinion as Jeannette Pickering Rankin and Neville Chamberlain. (Both of which were partially responsible for the rise of Hitler)
@gadfly450004 I have read and do know law. I do know self defense. I'm not talking about self defense. Maybe if you paid attention to the video you would know something. I'm talking about unnecessary killing. And don't even try and give me some bull about how a peaceful opinion brought hitler. All you gun people are the same, you come up for some stupid arguement about how guns are safe or necessary. I'm from Canada, so I dont care about the 2nd amendment. It's scary that somene like you exists
We don't have the right to murder, but there is a difference between killing and murdering. If someone puts my life or my family's life in danger, I have every right to defend myself and my family. The object of self-defense isn't to kill, it's to stop the attack. The death of the attacker may however be a by-product and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.
I believe I have the right to kill someone if they try to attack me first. I disagree with you, and know you are wrong. I thank you for your opinion and for excercising your right to free speech, I will excercise my right to carry a gun if I like. God had the Israelites go to war with the Canaanites. In my faith, I'm Roman Catholic, you go to hell for commiting suicide. Everyone who has commited suicide is in hell, IMO.
@DeltaBravo1216 I don't think so and neither does good. In our religion, which is ROMAN CATHOLIC, killing another is against the basic 10 commandments. From what our religion teaches us I'm not wrong, and last time I checked ur not God or the Pope so I;m not wrong. You have the right to DEFEND yourself, not kill them. What do you know about heaven and hell.. again nothing. Its all about faith, you can;t follow some parts and not others.
@dreamsxsilentx I am going off what I have been taught, but I agree with you. People have the right to defend, not to murder. I still have a right to carry a gun, I have the RESPONSIBILITY to use it for the right reasons. To defend myself, or my home, or even my country. It is a mortal sin to commit suicide, those who die with mortal sin on their soul go to hell. Catholic clergymen have written many times about the difference between murder, and protection. I still respect your opinion! :)
@dreamsxsilentx I am a Jew and I believe Jesus is the Messiah, I am a Messianic Jew. My point is you are not understanding the 10 commandments properly. In the original Hebrew, it says you shall not MURDER, not kill. To defend your own lives or any innocent life is just in the eyes of GOD. It says so in his words in the Holy Bible.
@ChromeFreak123 There's a difference between unnecessarily killing somebody and protecting your own life. Just because you get in fight with someone doesnt necessarily mean you need to pull out a gun or knife to solve out. But if they're going to kill you, clearly defend yourself:P
I'm catholic I feel that I am understanding the 10 commandments perfectly fine. You have your opinion and I have mine.
if all those girls had guns they would still be alive because that jerk would have thought twice before shooting that place up people should have the right to kill another person IF that said person trys to kill them I bet if some one pushed a gun barrel in your face you would wish that you had a gun if not than I hope you would enjoy becoming a statistic no disrespect just the truth
If you had read before I'm talking about unnecessary violence and murder not self defence. Well you can argue if everyone had guns we'd all be safe, but it works both ways, if nobody had guns we'd be safe. Two wrongs don't make a right. Just because you have a gun doesn't mean someone else wont shoot you. You have the right to self defence, you don't need to KILL someone else. What's wrong with knocking them out, or immobolizing them. Death doesn't need to be the answer.
@dreamsxsilentx WRONG. If there were no guns, we would NOT be safe. Killing is sometimes necessary, weather you like it or not. If a person is presented with a lethal treat, they DO have the right to protect THEIR own life. Some times that means taking that of the offenders. The world is not so black and white. I hope you soon learn that.
I just got back from Iraq and I have to say your a moron. I have seen burned, maimed, and messed up for the rest of their lives. What you want to know is there are people in this world need to be killed osama bin laden, hitler, stalin, Genghis kahn, and others people who have been responsible hundreds of thousands of lives. You are a young kid who has never seen war or anything outside you school so I will chalk this up as ignorance. When you grow up you will know whats worth fighting for.
That's not what I'm talking about. I mean people who go on mass murders for no reason not war. That's obviously a different story. I'm not talking about soldiers I meant murders in society. But if you wanna be ignorant and assume I'm talking about war knock yourself out. I'm not perpetuating terrorism... did I say osama bin Ladin is a great person... NO. So thanks for the hate...but you should take ur rude cmnt and shove it.
I'm not talking about only guns I just happened to mention it. And just because it's always existed doesn't mean we should accept. It says why kill others not why is there guns. But w.e
We, as human beings, have a natural right to violence, but not the right to instigate the use of coercive force. Once coercive force is instigated by one party, the other party has the right to violence to repel that force.
Unfortunately, most governments do not protect that natural right adequately.
not that im justifying mass murders, but if there were no guns, humans would still find another way to kill each other. social construction is the cause.
While this is still very true, its more about the concept of murder and killing people in general. However guns play an important cause because they allow for multiple to be harmed at once. I'm just trying to say that we shouldn't get off thinking were allowed to kill other people. Good point.
Why are you trolling my videos. I'm not even talking about american's in my video. And I'm from Canada so I would probably be where I am, considering Canada is part of the commonwealth under the protection of the crown. Your ignorant because I didn't say guns are the issue, I said I don't understand why people think they have the right to take someone else's life. Smart one..
dreamsxsilentx 7 months ago
@dreamsxsilentx So without the US, you suspect that Germany wouldn't have bombed the UK out of existance. Also, without the US, the UK would have starved and ran out of bullets long before our entrance into the war. Did you ever check out the news stories from China and Canada about the dangers of knives? Should we ban all sharp objects because a mad man can use them in a way to murder tens of children? This is your argument against guns, and it just makes you sound ignorant on the subject.
dlstb 7 months ago
@dlstb major trollz, you're just making yourself look stupid. this is about violence in general, but if you want to keep commenting go right ahead this is my last response.
dreamsxsilentx 7 months ago
This is a serious question. Have you never seen the news reports from China from when people go nuts and rampage elementary schools with knives?
March 23, 2010, man kills 8 and injures 5.
April 28, 2010, man stabs 28 children and 3 adults.
2008, a Chinese Canadian stabs man on greyhound and decapitates
If you still think guns are the problem... think about the fact that my car is a 4000 lb sledgehammer and missile combo. More are killed every year by cars than guns. >40,000 a year.
dlstb 7 months ago
@dlstb honestly you must be an idiot. You have no read any of the comments or what I've talked about. So I'm not even going to comment on what you talked about. Get a brain.
dreamsxsilentx 7 months ago
@dreamsxsilentx It appears that you resort to calling names when you are proven to be a scared child. The problem isn't guns, like you say, it is people. So long as people are fallable and yet intelligent, mass murder will happen. Your mention of guns at the beginning of the video and your pseudo explanation that a person cannot do as much harm without a gun serves to show that you are afraid of guns. Truth is that a person can harm just as many people without a gun as with a gun.
dlstb 7 months ago
Where do I think that I have the right to end some else's life? How about when they are an imminent threat to my life and/or the lives of my family? How about that for an answer Einstein? You have the right to defend yourself PERIOD. In fact, this is the most important right that we all have. Without it, one's life has no purpose.
drj90210 1 year ago
@drj90210 "Killing, since when do people think they have the right to kill someone else. Really. [obviously excluding cases where you're in mortal danger]." that's pulled right from description dumbass.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx I'll admit, I didn't read your description. However, it seems that your video is entirely different than your description, and it appears that you equate people who "go out and buy a gun" with killers. If this wasn't your intention, then perhaps you should rephrase yourself in the video because 100% of people who rated you obvioiusly heard the same thing that I heard (e.g. an ignorant rant against gun owners). Obviously killing is wrong: Hence laws against murder/manslaughter.
drj90210 1 year ago
@drj90210 Everyone just flips out about guns. I say what I mean in my video. Oh well for you if you misinterpret that. I just mentioned that he got a gun to kill people. That's not equating gun owners with killers. It would appear that you're all the same ignorant though. Its a gun. Calm down. Why do you care if I don't like guns, you're not changing my opinion.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx If all 17 people who rated your video are as "ignorant" as me, then what does that tell you regarding how well you phrased yourself?
drj90210 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx People do not murder because they believe that they have a "right" to do it. To suggest such a thing (as you did in your video) is idiotic. People kill because they are CRIMINALS and have an utter disregard for the law and contempt for human life. Few others kill because they are utterly insane. NOBODY goes out and kills just because they believe they have a RIGHT to do it. Laws against murder are quite clear; there are no specicial interest groups trying to legalize murder.
drj90210 1 year ago
@drj90210 Lol I thought you had a problem about defending your life. What now that I made you look stupid because it was in my description the whole time you have to complain about something. FAIL. Dumbass
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx The only failure was on your part. Your video was utterly pointless, which is why not a single person gave you a thumbs up as a rating.
drj90210 1 year ago 2
@drj90210 it shows me they're probably all American and got in a fuss when I mentioned guns in a way they feel makes them look bad. I can't help what videos you see with mine. It seems that videos people viewed before mine influenced their views. I barely even mention guns yet that's what everyone talks about. Ignorance is lack of knowledge you're ignorant about my video because you didn't read the description where I clarified before and you only take that ONE point of my video.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx Do you have something against Americans? If it weren't for Americans, where would you and the world be? BTW, anyone who declares that the problem is in any way guns and not entirely the individual behind the gun is ignorant. Also, the idea that you can judge whether or not a person will commit a crime in the future is entirely false. It is in the realm of pre-crime from Minority Report and it is contradictory to the American law system of innocent until proven guilty.
dlstb 7 months ago
@drj90210 Still no thumbs up.
acoow 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@drj90210 I give this response a thumbs up!
dlstb 7 months ago
I feel I have the right to kill another person in the event that that other person is treating my self, another loved one, another innocent person, or my USA!
That is why I am a proud gun owner, and take full advantage of my CCW license that my state offers
UltraXryder 1 year ago
dude i dont get it are you arguing something or are you just asking questions? and also you can be upset about this all you want its not going to stop it, which i do suppose is unfortunate
TeaBaggins 1 year ago
I'm sorry that you feel that no one has the right to kill someone else. Im sorry if someone is trying to rape or kill me I am going to kill them.
Now ...I don't agree with going out and shooting up a mall or a school, but that is 100% different than self defense. Just remember that! Oh and a side note... we aren't the only animals out there that go out and kill.
BriarRoseThorne 1 year ago
@BriarRoseThorne you make yourself looked stupid when you don't read the other comments or listen to what I said. I said that self defense is a different scenario. So don't try and make yourself look all clever. I don't need to remember that because I'm aware of that. In a situation where its you or them people will make the obvious decision. Animals do a lot of things does that mean we should do all of those things. That's a well thought out argument.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx theres a very simple answer to the question in your video and its that people who decide to kill someone else without an apparent reason arent thinking... in fact they probably have some kind of mental illness
ericsyutubeaccount 1 year ago
lol yur so fucked if anyone tries to mug u, or steal your car, or follows you home.
now your simply a reactionary, instead of being prepared.
NRAman123 1 year ago
@NRAman123 Why does that have to do with anything. There's a difference between defending yourself and then going for the kill.
Everyone just likes to pick that point. Did I mention those in the video. NO. Want to know why? because that's a different situation. If you're in a life or death clearly a person would try to save themselves. I'm talking about unnecessary killing and just walking up and killing someone because you can.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx and do you really think the banning of guns is gonna stop them, all thats gonna do is ensure that criminals have innocent victims because law abiding citizens are the only ones who will obey the law.
NRAman123 1 year ago
@NRAman123 Again I never mentioned the banning of guns. I talk about people feeling they have the right to kill someone for no reason. You're putting words in my mouth. It's not my problem you don't have a valid argument.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx you say guns are not the answer, what the hell does that mean?
there is no possible way to ensure that a person doesn't kill another person
NRAman123 1 year ago
@NRAman123 I didn't say you can control it. I'm just saying you don't have the right to kill someone else because you feel like you can.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
You said that guns aren't the answer (in a round about way I suppose) and you are right, but I would propose that taking guns away would not be the answer either. It just goes down to the human beings involved. The problem is not with the tools that one uses to kill, but with the person in the first place. The problem is that they have the desire to kill in the first place. The only way that can be fixed is by either complete and absolute control or by a change of heart.
8onebaddude8 1 year ago
@8onebaddude8 and so the true meaning of my video is revealed:)
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
I understand that it is irritating for people to start to go after something in your video that it is not really about. I am not sure if I said so earlier, but the reason people jump on the gun issue is that it is in their minds a right to defense and not killing that the gun pertains to. When you bring up guns they feel as though you are threatening that right despite the fact that your video is clearly about preserving life.
8onebaddude8 1 year ago
The line cannot be a gray area. It must be a firm unyielding line that all can see. Not everyone has to agree on it as there will always be those who disregard what is blatantly right and wrong. You want to know where the line is to be drawn. The only way to answer that is to answer the question, "Who decides what is right and wrong?" People will always disagree on this, but we can reasonably conclude that there is one answer as there is that moral law that we all "feel."
8onebaddude8 1 year ago
(continued) harder than you can imagine to not defend yourself if you have the presence of mind to think about it. Chances are, though, that you will not have the presence of mind. Also, the reason people jump on the gun part as I did is because that is the one thing in your video that would directly affect them. We do not have the right to take another's life, but it certain concessions must be made to take into account that there are people out there who simply don't care that they do not have
8onebaddude8 1 year ago
@8onebaddude8 I've never held a gun before in my life, and I have handled knives in the sense of cooking, but I'm pretty good with one. However, I think it would be easier for me, an average joe when it comes to guns, to simply pick up a gun and shoot someone killing them vs. using a knife to kill them. Not that I would. I understand that there's a lot to a gun, but ironically enough watch tv makes it easy to know the basics of shooting a gun. I probably couldn't load a mag
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@8onebaddude8 but that's besides the point. I used guns as an example the overall is violence and killing. Yes, I understand that. But it's irritating that a lot of people just jump to a gun and pull it out to solve the problem. And in terms of protection the point i wanted to make is if everyone has a gun how safe are you really. It's almost the same as if no one did. Everyone is on the same level, just greater damage is dealt to both parties.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
(continued) looked to be an old ice pick. It wasn't. It was a metal spike that he had used on several occasions. It would be inserted into the head right above the ear and then jostled around a bit. It was quick, effective and quiet. The spike itself is very easy to hide. I have no intention of killing anyone unless they become a threat to me, my family, or an obviously innocent person. If you want to pacifism that is fine. Actually I would admire you for that, but if you are attacked it will be
8onebaddude8 1 year ago
@8onebaddude8 The point that I wanted to make is that you don't just have the right to kill somebody. The example I used was of someone who just walked into a school and started killing people. I just don't understand when someone thinks its okay to kill other people because they're upset or feel entitled to. Fighting for your life is a different case. Knives have just as much potential, but are most harmful in hands of an expert, a gun in the hands of anyone is dangerous. Point and shoot.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx I see what you mean, but I must disagree with the point and shoot. I have dealt with many sorts of guns before and I can tell you that it is harder for the average joe down the street to pick up a gun and shoot it at a target and hit it. First he has to know how to operate the gun and that in itself is problematic. Mishandle the gun and it is likely to jam as well. Poor ammo may cause a failure to fire and poor magazines may cause failure to feed. My point is not that they cannot
8onebaddude8 1 year ago
I watched your video and there is something I want to clear up. You make a valid point, but there is something that you miss. "You wouldn't inflict as much harm without it(gun)." This is not true. Others have brought up knives so will I. There are many who would disagree with me, but I assure you that knives and other weapons have just as much potential to do harm. Example: friend of mine was a firefighter in the military. His uncle had been a Green Beret in Vietnam. My friend pulled out what
8onebaddude8 1 year ago
@8onebaddude8 The point I made was not about guns in general it was about people killing. Its the opinion that our world has so much violence. I understand that majority of people feel violence is the answer. But I feel its often the first choice over self defense and/or other choices. There are instances where you need to protect yourself, but where do you draw the line.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx that is an excellent question. The only way to answer that is to settle on a set of moral beliefs. We can all agree that there is something very wrong with killing, but what makes that wrong? Again, to answer that you have to go to a moral compass of sorts. People disagree on this. And honestly if someone ever does attack me I won't bother to defend my self. It would be wrong of me to, but if they decide to harm my loved ones I will respond with appropriate force. IMHO
8onebaddude8 1 year ago
I do have the right under the laws of human society to
EXTERMINATE.
Muslims and well people who break the laws of society.
Thats about 2 to 2.5 maybe 3 billion people.
More i think about the more i have budget for the ammo.
MoneyVSMetal 1 year ago
@MoneyVSMetal All of you who write these kind of things on my video are the pinnacle of why people shouldn't have guns.
You do NOT have the right to exterminate someone because they are Muslim. Everyone is entitled to have their own religion and set of beliefs. If people choose to be muslim that's their prerogative.
you sicken me..
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
To continue to my comment, there are people who go out and buy knives and go out and stab people. There are people who get serious road rage and use their 2 ton battering ram to take peoples lives. Should we ban cars? Should we ban knives? People are crazy bud, we can't do nothing about it. We have to defend ourselves from those who are crazy.
Dp908 1 year ago
@Dp908 You all jump on the gun part. I said in general. I used a gun as an example. It makes no sense when you think of the logic. If everyone has guns in their home, than you arent that safe. Anyone can just bring a gun and shoot you before you even grab a gun. In another case, an individual can break into your home and steal your guns and commit several crimes. How would you feel being responsible for providing weapons to an individual who is "crazy". There's self defense, and then extremism.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx Nobody is getting my firearms because they're under vault lock and key, unless the burgler will break into my house with die grinders with diamond cutting bits and blow torches. It has also been proven that an armed society is a polite society. Spite the liberal media you read, in the United States record has shown states with the least strict amount of gun control have lower crime. States with open carry, concealed carry with no license etc... have very little crime.
Dp908 1 year ago
@Dp908 Well I can prove or disprove the validity of your claim. But all it takes is one irresponsible person. In the event of a emergency if your guns are truly under such lock and key you wouldn't be so protected. Use statistics not from the states and I would be more impressed. Records and statistics are always biased based on the sampler. In the end if everyone has a gun, then you're not as safe as you think. It would be almost as the same as everyone not having a gun or just having a knife.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx Facts are facts. It has been proven on many occasions that states where citizens are free to exercise their RKBA (right to keep and bear arms) to the fullest extent are safer with lower crime. As far as my firearms being under lock and key, I mean when I'm away. The argument that the criminal could get the jump on you or take your gun away is not a very good simply because that rarely happens.
Dp908 1 year ago
@Dp908 It's not that hard to find statistics to support ones point. If you look you can always find "facts" and "stats" to prove or disprove your point. At the end of the day this is my opinion on killing and weapons. I'm not going to change it, you don't have to agree with it. But its still here. This back and forth is getting juvenile.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
I have a few problems here. I am a second amendment supporting, gun collecting, bullet casting, ammunition reloading, gun shooting American. I have a few firearms for home defense, the rest are for collecting purposes, or sporting purposes. I agree that we do not have the right to randomly take someones life, but under what circumstances? The bible says that its ok to take someones life in war, or in self defense. I stand by my right to take someones life if they try to harm me.
Dp908 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you have the right to defend your self.....
BarryPickett 1 year ago
Warning!!!: Internet tough guy incoming!
Rawls03 1 year ago
@Rawls03 I'm not trying to be tough. I just have an opinion and am standing up for it.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
that war is justified if it is meant to protect human life.
gadfly450004 1 year ago
@gadfly450004 You're so extra. You take your whole second ammendment so literally and to the extreme. If everyone has a gun, how does that make you any safer. It would be the same as nobody having a gun, it's the same level of safety and protection. One person can just use a gun on another. And the fact is registered guns end up in the possession of criminals and used in illegal activities..What's the use of something meant to kill other than to kill, its not "protection'
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
Are you saying Neville Chamberlain was right by establishing "peace in our time"? Guns are necessary for self-dense of one's person and of the state. Funny how the Nazis did NOT invade Switzerland which unlike most countries in Europe has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in not only Europe but in all the world. And no it was NOT because Hitler had a respect for the rule of law.
For the record it is NOT "Thou shall not kill" it is "Thou shall not murder"
Even the Popes have said
gadfly450004 1 year ago
@gadfly450004 Did I say that, no so don't use words that I didn't. It's easy to twist someone's point to make it what you want. Gun's are not necessary. It's called using a MOUTH which GOD gave you to solve your problems. If you have an issue with someone you don't just shoot them. And were not talking about war because that's its own category. At the end of the day this is my youtube channel, and my opinion, if you don't like what I have to say TOUGH. Don't watch my videos. :P kthanksbye
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
It is called "self-defense"! Try reading some law at some point
It is scary that someone like would be accepted into a law school.
Do me a favor, stop reading Brady Gun Control Group press releases and help yourself to a history textbook. It is a little group of words called the 2nd Amendment.
It is sad that a young student like you seems to have the adopted the opinion as Jeannette Pickering Rankin and Neville Chamberlain. (Both of which were partially responsible for the rise of Hitler)
gadfly450004 1 year ago
@gadfly450004 I have read and do know law. I do know self defense. I'm not talking about self defense. Maybe if you paid attention to the video you would know something. I'm talking about unnecessary killing. And don't even try and give me some bull about how a peaceful opinion brought hitler. All you gun people are the same, you come up for some stupid arguement about how guns are safe or necessary. I'm from Canada, so I dont care about the 2nd amendment. It's scary that somene like you exists
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
r u HOMO? O_o
lolproductions774 1 year ago
@lolproductions774 Yes. So what.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
We don't have the right to murder, but there is a difference between killing and murdering. If someone puts my life or my family's life in danger, I have every right to defend myself and my family. The object of self-defense isn't to kill, it's to stop the attack. The death of the attacker may however be a by-product and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.
jroberts7387 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You can kill anything to save your life. It's nature. No one can take your right to kill away.
Lions kill to defend themselves. They also kill to eat.
You can kill to defend yourself, and you can kill to eat.
If you are attacked by a bear, lion, wolf, alligator, rabid frog, or misguided Asian law student, you can defend yourself, its your right.
Bramendor 1 year ago
You can kill anything to save your life. It's nature. No one can take your right to kill away.
Lions kill to defend themselves. They also kill to eat.
You can kill to defend yourself, and you can kill to eat.
If you are attacked by a bear, lion, wolf, alligator, rabid frog, or misguided Asian law student, you can defend yourself, its your right.
Bramendor 1 year ago
I believe I have the right to kill someone if they try to attack me first. I disagree with you, and know you are wrong. I thank you for your opinion and for excercising your right to free speech, I will excercise my right to carry a gun if I like. God had the Israelites go to war with the Canaanites. In my faith, I'm Roman Catholic, you go to hell for commiting suicide. Everyone who has commited suicide is in hell, IMO.
DeltaBravo1216 1 year ago
@DeltaBravo1216 I don't think so and neither does good. In our religion, which is ROMAN CATHOLIC, killing another is against the basic 10 commandments. From what our religion teaches us I'm not wrong, and last time I checked ur not God or the Pope so I;m not wrong. You have the right to DEFEND yourself, not kill them. What do you know about heaven and hell.. again nothing. Its all about faith, you can;t follow some parts and not others.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx I am going off what I have been taught, but I agree with you. People have the right to defend, not to murder. I still have a right to carry a gun, I have the RESPONSIBILITY to use it for the right reasons. To defend myself, or my home, or even my country. It is a mortal sin to commit suicide, those who die with mortal sin on their soul go to hell. Catholic clergymen have written many times about the difference between murder, and protection. I still respect your opinion! :)
DeltaBravo1216 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx I am a Jew and I believe Jesus is the Messiah, I am a Messianic Jew. My point is you are not understanding the 10 commandments properly. In the original Hebrew, it says you shall not MURDER, not kill. To defend your own lives or any innocent life is just in the eyes of GOD. It says so in his words in the Holy Bible.
ChromeFreak123 1 year ago
@ChromeFreak123 There's a difference between unnecessarily killing somebody and protecting your own life. Just because you get in fight with someone doesnt necessarily mean you need to pull out a gun or knife to solve out. But if they're going to kill you, clearly defend yourself:P
I'm catholic I feel that I am understanding the 10 commandments perfectly fine. You have your opinion and I have mine.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
if all those girls had guns they would still be alive because that jerk would have thought twice before shooting that place up people should have the right to kill another person IF that said person trys to kill them I bet if some one pushed a gun barrel in your face you would wish that you had a gun if not than I hope you would enjoy becoming a statistic no disrespect just the truth
EggerRJ 1 year ago
@EggerRJ
If you had read before I'm talking about unnecessary violence and murder not self defence. Well you can argue if everyone had guns we'd all be safe, but it works both ways, if nobody had guns we'd be safe. Two wrongs don't make a right. Just because you have a gun doesn't mean someone else wont shoot you. You have the right to self defence, you don't need to KILL someone else. What's wrong with knocking them out, or immobolizing them. Death doesn't need to be the answer.
dreamsxsilentx 1 year ago
@dreamsxsilentx WRONG. If there were no guns, we would NOT be safe. Killing is sometimes necessary, weather you like it or not. If a person is presented with a lethal treat, they DO have the right to protect THEIR own life. Some times that means taking that of the offenders. The world is not so black and white. I hope you soon learn that.
tmknecht6 1 year ago
I just got back from Iraq and I have to say your a moron. I have seen burned, maimed, and messed up for the rest of their lives. What you want to know is there are people in this world need to be killed osama bin laden, hitler, stalin, Genghis kahn, and others people who have been responsible hundreds of thousands of lives. You are a young kid who has never seen war or anything outside you school so I will chalk this up as ignorance. When you grow up you will know whats worth fighting for.
sukurikm 2 years ago
That's not what I'm talking about. I mean people who go on mass murders for no reason not war. That's obviously a different story. I'm not talking about soldiers I meant murders in society. But if you wanna be ignorant and assume I'm talking about war knock yourself out. I'm not perpetuating terrorism... did I say osama bin Ladin is a great person... NO. So thanks for the hate...but you should take ur rude cmnt and shove it.
dreamsxsilentx 2 years ago
Homicide is just an unfortunate fact of life and it existed long before guns were ever invented
azzh00le 2 years ago
I'm not talking about only guns I just happened to mention it. And just because it's always existed doesn't mean we should accept. It says why kill others not why is there guns. But w.e
dreamsxsilentx 2 years ago
...Killing someone in defense of yourself or your family is fine.
You abuse my family? Ill take your life, whether you think I have the right or not. ^_^
theastrusmega 2 years ago
people dont buy a gun and later that day just go kill somone it more like somone steels a gun then gos and kills
TMHonfire 2 years ago
Very true, but thats only part of what I'm saying. But it does happen sometimes and when it does its tragic.
dreamsxsilentx 2 years ago
We, as human beings, have a natural right to violence, but not the right to instigate the use of coercive force. Once coercive force is instigated by one party, the other party has the right to violence to repel that force.
Unfortunately, most governments do not protect that natural right adequately.
DustoneGT 2 years ago
i meant unnecessary violence, there's self defence and thats one thing. But than there's the cases that aren't self defence.
dreamsxsilentx 2 years ago
not that im justifying mass murders, but if there were no guns, humans would still find another way to kill each other. social construction is the cause.
htxred 2 years ago
While this is still very true, its more about the concept of murder and killing people in general. However guns play an important cause because they allow for multiple to be harmed at once. I'm just trying to say that we shouldn't get off thinking were allowed to kill other people. Good point.
:)
dreamsxsilentx 2 years ago