"why else would silverstein give an advice to PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS WHATS THE SMARTEST THING TO DO? HOW DOES SILVERSTEIN KNOW WHATS THE SMARTEST THING TO DO? answer is easy"
yep. I'm a souless person for helping murderer's and you're adding more. i never said that I killed anyone. i may have IMPLIED it by accident though...
Firefighters aren't in the business of "pulling it". They aren't trained in explosives, they are trained in water. And it takes weeks to prepare a building for pulling. This is a confession.
i gave u an example of a big building beeing demolished and it was a cracking sound, however since the wtc 7 was so far away from the camera positions u would be not able to hear any sound.u just see the building fall without any sound.
do u think a 47 storey building makes no noise when it collapse in 6.8 seconds?
it makes alot but the cameras are to far away.
so u cant figure out if there was exploding sounds or not
show me 1 building wich falls due fires in this style ,there is no 1 in the world.
wtc 7 wasnt hit by an plane , the diesel tanks where on the bottom floors only small fires where in the upper floors as every1 can see in the vids.the madrid building was burning like a torch for over 12 hours even the crane on top didnt fall
Find me buildings designed like the WTC towers. Madrid's bare steel collapsed, while the CONCRETE-REINFORCED steel remained standing. Why is the smoke billowing out the WTC 7? Small fires my achin' ass.
sry but u r admitting this ridiculous things , that buildings can fall by themselves in freefall speed due to fire, i never heard about it , so how do u know that this can happen?
hmm i guess u r talking about urself , cause i prvoded alot evidence and u just say stupid things like professional firefighters ask owners of buildings what to do in cause of fires.cause they dont know what to do but owners of the buildings know what to do.
this is absolute retarded, and every firefighter would kick u in ur ass to selling this shit to the ppl.
When did I ever suggest the FDNY asked Silverstein for anything? See, that's called a straw man argument. I never said the firefighter didn't know what to do. In fact, they did! "They made the decision to pull [rescue operations]." Chief Nigro is a hero for disbanding the rescue effort and prevent any more causulties. You have nothing but impossible theories of silent explosives set off by fire department.
neverforget said that.read hes stupid comments."the smartest thing to do is pull it, and they made the decision to pull and then we watched the building collapsed."
nobody can say it clearer than this .
why do u think the "it" refers to the firefighters? u need alot fantasy to ignore so much evidence for a cd, but its ok ,alot ppl who read the comments will decide wich arguments are stupid or not.
u said the firefighters didnt knew what to do cause they never had this kind of scenario , so they asked silverstein for an advise, why else would silverstein give an advice to PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS WHATS THE SMARTEST THING TO DO? HOW DOES SILVERSTEIN KNOW WHATS THE SMARTEST THING TO DO? answer is easy
the building was prepared and the firefighter chief said they dont know if they can control the fire so the smartest thing is to pull "IT". they had such a great loss of life (on this day) lets no risk any other lifes of firefighters to distinguish the fire, so lets just PULL THE BUILDING OR "IT" .
the wtc buildings had heavy damages so the smartest thing is to pull the buildings , like they did.there is no reason to call silverstein and tell that they cant control the fire.
in no way would any firedepartment chief call any owner of a burning building and get an advice from him.
a fire department chief would stop the actions without talking with the owner about it, only if they had the option to pull the building they would talk about it.
"why else would silverstein give an advice to PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS WHATS THE SMARTEST THING TO DO? HOW DOES SILVERSTEIN KNOW WHATS THE SMARTEST THING TO DO? answer is easy"
yep. they pulled the firefighters out of the building.
and you're adding more. i never said that they asked him for advice. i may have IMPLIED it by accident though...
"They made the decision to pull it" is referring to the rescue operations being 'pulled' back to prevent loss of life. "We watched the building collapse" he was with his wife. Nigro confirms this account and there are many firefighters who can corroborate being 'pulled'. Why demolish a building because of fire? It makes no sense.
the fires was in the upper floors 100 meters above , so how could any of the firefighters think that a stealframe building would collapse due to small fires?
watch an experts opinion about it: watch?v=HgoSOQ2xrbI
it wasnt even burning like a torch like the fires in madrids skyscraper, and even that building didnt collapsed.why would firefighters think a building with a few fires would collapse?
did any steelframe scyscraper collapsed in the whole history due fire ?
if u know 1 post a link i would like to analyse it.
and pull means exactly what i imply in this case when a building collapse like controlled demo.its a common word in the controlled demo business.if the owner say they pulled it AND the building collapse like it was PULLED, its obvious what it means
if the building hadnt collapsed this style i wouldnt say that it was a demo
Cables that are attached to buildings to 'pull' them down. See WTC 5 & 6. Both damaged beyond repair and thus were demolished. You really are in the dark!
they have radio controlled devices , no cables needed , they just put a device in a preplanted hole or attach them at the pillars or whatever and they just pull the trigger.
" Why demolish a building because of fire? It makes no sense. "
cause it makes no sense to u, it makes no sense at all?lol
u think ur knowledge = same knowledge bush
jovenko said it is clearly a demolition and every 1 with a bit sense of physics can figure it out.
it looks like a demolition, silverstein said that they pulled it so whats the question about it?only retards can say after all evidence thats not a controlled demo
Christ man use an ounce of grammar. I can easily ask 'So because it looks like a demolition to you, it must be?'. You know Jvenko didn't think WTC 1 or 2 were demolitions, right? Also, Jvenko should publish a peer-reviewed paper on WTC 7.
i dont care what he says about wtc 1 or 2 we are talking about the confession of a criminal who is part of the conspiracy.he confessed that they pulled the building and the building falls exactly like a building wich get pulled.
an expert says clearly it is a cd , so what else do u need to be convinced?
He admitted to demolishing his own building, on national TV? He's an awful con man. You don't even know how the companies pull buildings so your opinion is moot. I need more than one interview with a guy who didn't know WTC 7 fell on 9/11. Also, I'll need to hear explsoives going off that are consistent with other demolitions. I don't.
u cant hear explosions so far away from the building.
"You don't even know how the companies pull buildings so your opinion is moot"i know very well how they do it and an expert said the same thing.but u can show me a building collapsing after small fires ,like wtc 7 did .
it must be easy to find alot cause u r so sure that buildings can fall like wtc 7 by themselves.
Lie, lie, lie. Stop it. Seriously. The fires were not small! Not to mention the near 20 story gash it sustained. I can't believe you said no one can hear explosions from far away. How far exactly? Were there no bystanders or officials near the collapse zone?
Larry Silverstein is recollecting a call made by Chief Nigro -Larry was not at GZ, he was with his wife at the time- and was told that the building was becoming unstable and that if it collapsed any firefighters or rescue workers would be killed.
if silverstein made the decision to "pull" the firefighters out, since what day in history, fire departments ask the owners, what to do and when they stop the firefightings ???this is so stupid
i hope new york will never have serious fires in future cause their firefighters dont know what to do when buildings are on fire ,lol.i hope some grown ups read ur childish comments about professional firefighters
"i hope some grown ups read ur childish comments about professional firefighters"
nothing childish about my comments. your comments seem to be childish since im not the one calling things childish and stupid. ive been calm. childish comments arent usually calm.
REALIZE the coverup is in FULL FORCE, the right-wing media are fully complicit which is why you only rarely see 9/11 truth discussed outside the Web. And there are many LYING SHILLS working to maintain the coverup, some of them you see here may have even been the ones to set the thermite and explosive charges. SURE they're going to try and squelch any curiousity into 9/11 discrepancies, just like Bush and Cheney at first fought so hard against even having any kind of 9/11 investigation.
OBSERVE *how much time* the LYING SHILLS spend "debunking" (they'd like to think) the clear and obvious fact 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB.
You will QUICKLY REALIZE that THE 9/11 COVERUP IS IN PROGRESS when there is SO MUCH EFFORT and so much of it is OUTRIGHT LIES AND DISINFORMATION. It looks like Karl Rove stays pretty busy managing his band of right-wing flying monkeys for Bush.
Could be part of why Rove left the White House, to devote more time to reinforcing the coverup.
"They say it means demolition, but he's talking to the fire department commander about not being able to control the fires because of a to great loss of life."
firstly no firemen ever said they couldnt control the fire in B.7, and secondly how many people died in building 7? :)
"They made that decision to pull it and we watched the building collapse".
OOPS! Now observe the coverup damage control as the LYING LIAR SHILLS try to make stupid gullible people believe Silverstein was talking about "pulling out the firefighters".
Who would ever say that firefighters were "pulled it"? NOBODY.
DNA can be matched against a close relative (father, mother, son, daughter, brother, uncle, etc.) because they will have many more base pairs in common than between any two random people.
does he just randomly form sentences because hes an idiot? or what is it dude?
If you have any faith in the Popular Mechanics people, then i demand you to watch this video of a radio show interviewing Davin Coburn the researcher for Popular Mechanics. and watch both parts.
In the case of "911neverforget", "pull it" also means to change the meaning of words (it sure wasn't "pull them", was it?) and apparently in this context it means "pull the wool over your eyes".
If you believe this LIE from a LYING SHILL FOR THE 9/11 MASS MURDERERS then you're pretty fucking lame.
They say it means demolition, but he's talking to the fire department commander about not being able to control the fires because of a to great loss of life.
He's obviously talking about pulling firemen out of WTC7.
"why else would silverstein give an advice to PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS WHATS THE SMARTEST THING TO DO? HOW DOES SILVERSTEIN KNOW WHATS THE SMARTEST THING TO DO? answer is easy"
yep. I'm a souless person for helping murderer's and you're adding more. i never said that I killed anyone. i may have IMPLIED it by accident though...
911DebunkingPro 4 years ago
Firefighters aren't in the business of "pulling it". They aren't trained in explosives, they are trained in water. And it takes weeks to prepare a building for pulling. This is a confession.
jaymzdean 4 years ago
*You
Landmark Tower Demolition:
watch?v=ZL5VEzlYtgo
Able to hear the booms from pretty far way.
You have been officially debunked my friend.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
lol first this is not far away its just around the corner , nothing like the far away shots from wtc 7 zoomed in.
second they dont use allways the same method to pull a building.
third many ppl said they heared a cracking sound just before the wtc 7 fall .
it also can sound like this when u stand near the building : watch?v=7xLzTKQ4-qU
horror11 4 years ago
"Cracking" sounds? Explosive charges are louder than the sound of a building collapsing.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
i gave u an example of a big building beeing demolished and it was a cracking sound, however since the wtc 7 was so far away from the camera positions u would be not able to hear any sound.u just see the building fall without any sound.
do u think a 47 storey building makes no noise when it collapse in 6.8 seconds?
it makes alot but the cameras are to far away.
so u cant figure out if there was exploding sounds or not
horror11 4 years ago
Horror, if you were a witness to my murder I'd want your barred from testifying on my behalf.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
I think my posts containing these links were either deleted or something happened to my computer but H11, read there:
debunking911 dot com slash firsttime dot htm
debunking911 dot com slash fire dot htm
I have plenty more.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
ur links are nonsense.
show me 1 building wich falls due fires in this style ,there is no 1 in the world.
wtc 7 wasnt hit by an plane , the diesel tanks where on the bottom floors only small fires where in the upper floors as every1 can see in the vids.the madrid building was burning like a torch for over 12 hours even the crane on top didnt fall
horror11 4 years ago
to let fall the wtc 7 like it did ,u need to cut simultanously all the steelbeams from the infrastructure on the base. no fire can do this .
it was a symmetric fall but the fires couldnt do a damage to the whole infrastructure, even a 3 years old can figure it out.
the freefall speed is the point.
the outer walls falls inwards just how dc works.
they make an implosion an the outer walls fall inwards, just like it did.
horror11 4 years ago
Except when 7 fell it didn't fall onto its footprint.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
it falls onto its footprints look at high res fotos from wtc 7
horror11 4 years ago
Find me buildings designed like the WTC towers. Madrid's bare steel collapsed, while the CONCRETE-REINFORCED steel remained standing. Why is the smoke billowing out the WTC 7? Small fires my achin' ass.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
sry but u r admitting this ridiculous things , that buildings can fall by themselves in freefall speed due to fire, i never heard about it , so how do u know that this can happen?
horror11 4 years ago
See, you set up straw men and knock them down and declare victory without actually saying anything.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
hmm i guess u r talking about urself , cause i prvoded alot evidence and u just say stupid things like professional firefighters ask owners of buildings what to do in cause of fires.cause they dont know what to do but owners of the buildings know what to do.
this is absolute retarded, and every firefighter would kick u in ur ass to selling this shit to the ppl.
horror11 4 years ago
When did I ever suggest the FDNY asked Silverstein for anything? See, that's called a straw man argument. I never said the firefighter didn't know what to do. In fact, they did! "They made the decision to pull [rescue operations]." Chief Nigro is a hero for disbanding the rescue effort and prevent any more causulties. You have nothing but impossible theories of silent explosives set off by fire department.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
neverforget said that.read hes stupid comments."the smartest thing to do is pull it, and they made the decision to pull and then we watched the building collapsed."
nobody can say it clearer than this .
why do u think the "it" refers to the firefighters? u need alot fantasy to ignore so much evidence for a cd, but its ok ,alot ppl who read the comments will decide wich arguments are stupid or not.
horror11 4 years ago
"neverforget said that."
i never said it either.
"why do u think the "it" refers to the firefighters?"
you think we dont call someone an "It?"
911NeverForget 4 years ago
u said the firefighters didnt knew what to do cause they never had this kind of scenario , so they asked silverstein for an advise, why else would silverstein give an advice to PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS WHATS THE SMARTEST THING TO DO? HOW DOES SILVERSTEIN KNOW WHATS THE SMARTEST THING TO DO? answer is easy
horror11 4 years ago
the building was prepared and the firefighter chief said they dont know if they can control the fire so the smartest thing is to pull "IT". they had such a great loss of life (on this day) lets no risk any other lifes of firefighters to distinguish the fire, so lets just PULL THE BUILDING OR "IT" .
thats what he means.
horror11 4 years ago
yet, people can be called "It" as well.
what makes more sense:
"the best thing to do is to pull the building down," or
"the best thing to do is to pull the firemen out of that building?"
911NeverForget 4 years ago
the wtc buildings had heavy damages so the smartest thing is to pull the buildings , like they did.there is no reason to call silverstein and tell that they cant control the fire.
in no way would any firedepartment chief call any owner of a burning building and get an advice from him.
a fire department chief would stop the actions without talking with the owner about it, only if they had the option to pull the building they would talk about it.
horror11 4 years ago
it = building 7
You don't have to be a genius to figure that out, but you have to be in denial to conclude otherwise.
jaymzdean 4 years ago
"why else would silverstein give an advice to PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS WHATS THE SMARTEST THING TO DO? HOW DOES SILVERSTEIN KNOW WHATS THE SMARTEST THING TO DO? answer is easy"
yep. they pulled the firefighters out of the building.
and you're adding more. i never said that they asked him for advice. i may have IMPLIED it by accident though...
911NeverForget 4 years ago
"They made the decision to pull it" is referring to the rescue operations being 'pulled' back to prevent loss of life. "We watched the building collapse" he was with his wife. Nigro confirms this account and there are many firefighters who can corroborate being 'pulled'. Why demolish a building because of fire? It makes no sense.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
omg next 1 .the owner claim that they decide to pull it and than they watched it collapse
wtc 7 falls at freefall speed like any other building wich get demolished.if u guys have no idea of physics dont ask stupid things.
they pulled the building to hide something.
horror11 4 years ago
the fires was in the upper floors 100 meters above , so how could any of the firefighters think that a stealframe building would collapse due to small fires?
watch an experts opinion about it: watch?v=HgoSOQ2xrbI
horror11 4 years ago
it wasnt even burning like a torch like the fires in madrids skyscraper, and even that building didnt collapsed.why would firefighters think a building with a few fires would collapse?
did any steelframe scyscraper collapsed in the whole history due fire ?
if u know 1 post a link i would like to analyse it.
horror11 4 years ago
Where are the cables? I don't think 'pull' means what you imply it means.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
lol what cables?
horror11 4 years ago
and pull means exactly what i imply in this case when a building collapse like controlled demo.its a common word in the controlled demo business.if the owner say they pulled it AND the building collapse like it was PULLED, its obvious what it means
if the building hadnt collapsed this style i wouldnt say that it was a demo
horror11 4 years ago
Pulling a building means using cables to topple it.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
Cables that are attached to buildings to 'pull' them down. See WTC 5 & 6. Both damaged beyond repair and thus were demolished. You really are in the dark!
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
kid u r really funny.
they have radio controlled devices , no cables needed , they just put a device in a preplanted hole or attach them at the pillars or whatever and they just pull the trigger.
horror11 4 years ago
You don't know what the hell you're talking about. THEY USE *CABLES* TO "PULL" THE BUILDING -DOWN- WHY CAN'T YOU GET THIS?
Seriously.
(I think I'm allowed one all-caps sentence per twoofer really)
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
" Why demolish a building because of fire? It makes no sense. "
cause it makes no sense to u, it makes no sense at all?lol
u think ur knowledge = same knowledge bush
jovenko said it is clearly a demolition and every 1 with a bit sense of physics can figure it out.
it looks like a demolition, silverstein said that they pulled it so whats the question about it?only retards can say after all evidence thats not a controlled demo
horror11 4 years ago
Christ man use an ounce of grammar. I can easily ask 'So because it looks like a demolition to you, it must be?'. You know Jvenko didn't think WTC 1 or 2 were demolitions, right? Also, Jvenko should publish a peer-reviewed paper on WTC 7.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
i dont care what he says about wtc 1 or 2 we are talking about the confession of a criminal who is part of the conspiracy.he confessed that they pulled the building and the building falls exactly like a building wich get pulled.
an expert says clearly it is a cd , so what else do u need to be convinced?
horror11 4 years ago
i knew it before i ever saw his confession that this building was demolished.
freefall speed isnt possible if a building just collapse , but this is physics and im sure u are not the right 1 to talk about newtons laws
horror11 4 years ago
Yawn. East mechanical penthouse began the collapse, you're being lied to.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
i know this , but whats ur point?
the start of the collapsing is the indicator not if pices of penthouse fall down to the roof
horror11 4 years ago
He admitted to demolishing his own building, on national TV? He's an awful con man. You don't even know how the companies pull buildings so your opinion is moot. I need more than one interview with a guy who didn't know WTC 7 fell on 9/11. Also, I'll need to hear explsoives going off that are consistent with other demolitions. I don't.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
u cant hear explosions so far away from the building.
"You don't even know how the companies pull buildings so your opinion is moot"i know very well how they do it and an expert said the same thing.but u can show me a building collapsing after small fires ,like wtc 7 did .
it must be easy to find alot cause u r so sure that buildings can fall like wtc 7 by themselves.
horror11 4 years ago
"He admitted to demolishing his own building, on national TV? "
maybe he didnt realised at this moment that this would mean that the building was prepared in advance
maybe he is just a stupid coward, who knows.
bush said on national tv 2 times that he saw LIVE the first hit at wtc but the first hit wasnt ever in tv live, so what does this means?
horror11 4 years ago
I'm not going to defend Bush's idiocy.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
Lie, lie, lie. Stop it. Seriously. The fires were not small! Not to mention the near 20 story gash it sustained. I can't believe you said no one can hear explosions from far away. How far exactly? Were there no bystanders or officials near the collapse zone?
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
Larry Silverstein is recollecting a call made by Chief Nigro -Larry was not at GZ, he was with his wife at the time- and was told that the building was becoming unstable and that if it collapsed any firefighters or rescue workers would be killed.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
if silverstein made the decision to "pull" the firefighters out, since what day in history, fire departments ask the owners, what to do and when they stop the firefightings ???this is so stupid
horror11 4 years ago
"since what day in history, fire departments ask the owners, what to do and when they stop the firefightings ???"
since what day, do CTists never think that just because it never happened, doesnt mean that it can?
"this is so stupid"
whats so stupid? is it because i posted it? if it is, then too bad for you.
911NeverForget 4 years ago
"whats so stupid? is it because i posted it? if it is, then too bad for you. "
no,its stupid to claim the firefighters ask the owners to decide what to do,lol.
"since what day, do CTists never think that just because it never happened, doesnt mean that it can?"
thats a good point,who knows maybe they ask dolly parton next time or britney spears.
horror11 4 years ago
"no,its stupid to claim the firefighters ask the owners to decide what to do, lol"
the firefighters didnt know what do to. they've never seen such a day of events on this scale.
911NeverForget 4 years ago
i hope new york will never have serious fires in future cause their firefighters dont know what to do when buildings are on fire ,lol.i hope some grown ups read ur childish comments about professional firefighters
horror11 4 years ago
"i hope some grown ups read ur childish comments about professional firefighters"
nothing childish about my comments. your comments seem to be childish since im not the one calling things childish and stupid. ive been calm. childish comments arent usually calm.
911NeverForget 4 years ago
You are a smear merchant.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
and how did silverstein know what to do, is he an experinced proffesional firefighter and has experience with terror attacks?
u r telling bs lol.
horror11 4 years ago
When did Silverstein made a decision about anything?
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
the fire department chief called him and silverstein said the smartest thing to do is pull it and they made the decision to pull.
how can silverstein know what is the smartest thing?is he a firefighter ?no
but the building was already prepared and silverstein just gave the advice to "pull it" cause this is the "smartest thing " to do ,
so silverstein made the decision for them, cause the building was allready prepared for the demo.whats so difficult about it ?
horror11 4 years ago
REALIZE the coverup is in FULL FORCE, the right-wing media are fully complicit which is why you only rarely see 9/11 truth discussed outside the Web. And there are many LYING SHILLS working to maintain the coverup, some of them you see here may have even been the ones to set the thermite and explosive charges. SURE they're going to try and squelch any curiousity into 9/11 discrepancies, just like Bush and Cheney at first fought so hard against even having any kind of 9/11 investigation.
911NeverForgetLIES 4 years ago
cloning me shows how immature you are.
get a life.
911NeverForget 4 years ago
OBSERVE *how much time* the LYING SHILLS spend "debunking" (they'd like to think) the clear and obvious fact 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB.
You will QUICKLY REALIZE that THE 9/11 COVERUP IS IN PROGRESS when there is SO MUCH EFFORT and so much of it is OUTRIGHT LIES AND DISINFORMATION. It looks like Karl Rove stays pretty busy managing his band of right-wing flying monkeys for Bush.
Could be part of why Rove left the White House, to devote more time to reinforcing the coverup.
ArbeitMachtFreiUSA 4 years ago
another LiarExposer account...
911NeverForget 4 years ago
Yup, all bark and no facts.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
"They say it means demolition, but he's talking to the fire department commander about not being able to control the fires because of a to great loss of life."
firstly no firemen ever said they couldnt control the fire in B.7, and secondly how many people died in building 7? :)
you dont refer to people as "IT"
xaninha123 4 years ago
yes they did. where did you hear that, from the little voice in your head?
no one died in building 7. gee, i wonder what was DONE to avoid a loss of life...
again, this is SLANG.
911NeverForget 4 years ago
DNA can be matched against a close relative because they will have many more base pairs in common than between any two random people.
so and how could they knew the relatives from the collected DNA?
i guess you didnt get the question.
xaninha123 4 years ago
"They made that decision to pull it and we watched the building collapse".
OOPS! Now observe the coverup damage control as the LYING LIAR SHILLS try to make stupid gullible people believe Silverstein was talking about "pulling out the firefighters".
Who would ever say that firefighters were "pulled it"? NOBODY.
RepugTardsSuck 4 years ago
how about phrasing it differently?
911NeverForget 4 years ago
Who was Larry speaking to when he made that comment? And at what time? Get this right and you'll earn a gold star!
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
i have a few questions. CTsts couldn´t answer me them. Also the Popular Mechanics guys couldn´t.
the 19 hijackers list that till this day hasn´t changed, tho many of those people on this list are still alive and well.(?)
they collected DNA from the rubbel and molten steel, amongst those thousands of victims.(?) And matched these samples with what against?(?)
i hope you can help me there :/
xaninha123 4 years ago
DNA can be matched against a close relative (father, mother, son, daughter, brother, uncle, etc.) because they will have many more base pairs in common than between any two random people.
RepugTardsSuck 4 years ago
Soooo, and how is it taken out of context?
im curious to hear that.
how would you describe the term "Pull it"
does he just randomly form sentences because hes an idiot? or what is it dude?
If you have any faith in the Popular Mechanics people, then i demand you to watch this video of a radio show interviewing Davin Coburn the researcher for Popular Mechanics. and watch both parts.
/watch?v=XLx5GATh_z0&mode=related&search=
xaninha123 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
his quote was changed by what he meant in terms of "pull it." he doesnt randomly form sentences.
"pull it" means to pull firefighters out of a building.
911NeverForget 4 years ago
Funny thing is Alex Jones says no, they were told to "pull out"
watch?v=cdxGEV2J04U @ 3:29
hahahahaha
THEDemotivator 4 years ago
In the case of "911neverforget", "pull it" also means to change the meaning of words (it sure wasn't "pull them", was it?) and apparently in this context it means "pull the wool over your eyes".
If you believe this LIE from a LYING SHILL FOR THE 9/11 MASS MURDERERS then you're pretty fucking lame.
.
RepugTardsSuck 4 years ago
apparently, you dont know that its called slang.
- 10-4 in radio talk can mean "yes."
- when someone says "dawg," it means "i like you," or "friend."
- a "dude" is a man.
as you can see, not all slang words have to sound like its meaning.
911NeverForget 4 years ago
"Soooo, and how is it taken out of context?"
They say it means demolition, but he's talking to the fire department commander about not being able to control the fires because of a to great loss of life.
He's obviously talking about pulling firemen out of WTC7.
DkEugen 4 years ago
what loss of life? explain pls
horror11 4 years ago