This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Also don't include god with abortion. god has ordered countless genocides of men women AND children. It's only hypocritical too assume god gives a fuck about saving babies. This coming from an agnostic, no offence intended too those who might take offence.
(I just thought too myself, why the fuck am I even commenting on this? I must be really bored because either way I'm a guy and this has nothing too do with me.)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You may not like me saying this but abortion will never be illegal. It has been the court of last resort throughout all cultures and all of civilizations times. Making abortions illegal would only lead too botched abortions and women dying considering some women physically can't have a child. If pro lifers want to save lifes, support condoms and safe sex being taught in schools. Also don't support the death penalty since you'll only be contradicting yourselves.
what a fucking retard you are , kill an innocent defensless infant who has done no wrong , but someone who has murdered children elderly people commited the most horrific crimes know to man and would do it again , you want to keep these people in prisons for life so taxpayers can pay for them , you truly are the skum of the earth , Liberalism is a mental disorder you support killing inocecnt defensless babys , but you want to keep the worst killers on earth locked up forever and pay for them
The excuse pro lifers often make is that all life is precious. In many murderers cases, I would blame society. [Although that is all subjective thinking.] After seeing your constructive criticism, (sarcasm) I believe I've earned the right of calling you troll. Your assumptions of me as a liberal are also wrong. Besides all that? Insulting me sure showed me what a mature thinker you are.
Yet that's another reason why youtube is a dead end for retarded arguments that will never go anywhere.
I'd like to ask, what about the women's rights? You want to take over their bodies, over some unwanted parasite? What if the woman is raped? What if she physically can't have a child or she'll die? What if she can't afford a child financially? You want that innocent child to be brought into this world just to die of starvation? Are you going to hold her down and make her give birth? It's disgusting how strong your urge to control the actions of others around you is.
so you look at a human growing in a womans body as a parasite?u sick fuck, there are countless couples who cant have children , that would do anything to have a child and they wouldcare less if the woman was raped , which is very rare that a woman gets pregnant from rape ,
and if the woman cant take care of the baby give it up for adoption you sick bitch where its a womans life or the babys is maybe 1 in 10,000 probably more like 1 in 100,000 even in that case its still gods desicion not mans
If a conjioned twin is inside of you, obviously it would have to be removed or you would both die. What is being discussed here are viable babies that could be delivered.The women can't be arrested because abortion is legal. Your argument just muddies the water.
Lets refer to the extreme anti-abortion movement murderers by their proper name - CONSERVATIVES!
All abortion doctor killers of the 90s were Conservative. Timothy McVeigh - Conservative! Torture advocates - Conservative! Secessionists - Conservative!
Dont forget what Conservatives stand for during the upcoming elections! Americans must continue to remove them from our government in 2010/12, just like we did in 2006/08! Conservatism is a cult - how much more evidence do we need?!
She used to be head nurse at an abortion clinic. What experience have you had? Abortion has been made out to be political in order to further divide and conquer.
uncleosbert - What about serial killers that have no conscience or regrets afterwards. Does that make the murders right? Are we going to change the laws to protect the serial killers next because of the least common denominator of a criminal mind ? KKK members don't regret their actions either.
is this woman a serial killer? or did she do what the women who came seeking her services wanted her to do?
what about those women? are they murderers? should we arrest them?
how should this be handled? if i was born with a conjoined twin inside me, that will kill me if it's not removed (but can't survive on its own), is the doctor who saves me a murderer? where do you draw the line?
wow.. must've been a long trip. I know it was worth it though.. thanks! Will subscribe to stay up to date. I don't know your stance on abortion, but you might want to check out and maybe even interview a group called Bound4Life. their based out of washington DC I think. you can find em on google.
The evidence is the many women who have abortions and say on television that they regret it and regret for the rest of there lives. Look it up dumbass.
Now THAT'S a myth. The women regret them do so because they come to realize fully the OBJECTIVE fact about abortion - the killing of another human being. It's the abortion proponents who hide facts and obfuscate. Like that idea that a fetus is not worthy of equal rights or is just 'a clump of cells'. Abortion supporters sell lies.
Many women regret them; most do not. But, it's the WOMAN's decision, and not the male's or some controlling preacher's.
Now, are the Iraqi fetuses that Bush had bombed beginning in 2003 not as equal as the American fetuses? Different subject you say? Balderdash if you do.
Did the bombs specifically seek out Iraqi fetuses did they? LOL! Stupid answer. Abortion is a very deliberate act towards a vulnerable human being in a country with supposedly amongst the best health care in the world. And as far as making 'decisions' goes, does the fetus get the same right to make any decisions? Ever heard of the concept of EQUAL rights? Abortion is about the DENIAL of rights. It is a human rights VIOLATION.
Logofreetv: No, but fetuses were killed. Spin your war support, though. It's what your "prolifers" do well. Now, if the fetus is equal to a born child, I am sure you'll go against the "prolife" tide (nearly 99%) and support the same type of punishments for women who have illegal abortions as those who drown their born children (like Susan Smith did). Did you know about 99% of "prolifers" don't want women who seek or have illegal abortions to be punished? Sheer hypocrisy (but nothing new).
The fetus is a human being. Period. It's only an after-the-fact definition of a 'person' that lets you THINK that abortion isn't actually murder, nevertheless, that's what it is. btw, nice little irrelevance about supporting war. And it logically follows because of...??? You can spin whatever you like, and change the subject too - but it's all about the powerful denying rights from the weak because they can. Abortion is murder of a vulnerable human being. And the murderers make money.
My point about the punishment of the women who seek abortions is that nearly all legislators who want to criminalize abortions, and most of the "prolifers", don't want to provide for the same punishment for those women as women who kill their born children. If the fetus is equal to the born child, then the women, not just the doctors, should be punished. But, as we know, hypocrisy is part of the "prolife" movement. More hypocrisy is found for those people who want rape and incest exceptions.
You obviously don't understand that the law recognizes at the very least differences between perpetrators and accomplices, which it most certainly does. And I actually don't want exceptions for rape and incest - it only complicates matters for the women involved and it is wrong to commit another act of violence in an attempt to solve another. And you can parrot on with your name calling all you like - not bothered by it at all.
Wrong about perpetrators and accomplices. In nearly all states, the getaway driver is equally culpable to the bank robber. My comment about hypocrisy is true. If you truly believe the unborn is equal to the born, then the punishment should be consistent. But, the fact of the matter is you "prolifers" rationalize things. Anyway, I am just thankful Roe v. Wade is still in effect.
I'm sorry, but the law DOES recognize differences between perpetrators and accomplices otherwise the terms are interchangeable, which they are not. I mean, why even have different words? Go find yourself a dictionary if it will help. The fact that for a given crime they decide to mete out the same punishment has no relevance to abortion. Different situation. The law also recognizes coercion and mitigating circumstances. You are really stretching here. Who's rationalizing???
If you are prolife, you can't support the war on Iraq and be consistent. Unless, of course, you think can rationalize anything to suit your agenda. Iraq isn't a defense of our country--it was an act of aggression.
I did not bring up the Iraqi war - you did. What I am pointing out to you is that bringing it up is IRRELEVANT. I'm not defending it or condoning it - just pointing out that it has no similarity whatsoever to abortion, except that people die (so what? people die from drowning or car crashes). Any justifications for war are a completely different argument. I've actually no interest in discussing it, beyond showing that your point is worthless. Stick to the subject, which is abortion.
No, the Iraqi war is not irrelevant. However, if you consider yourself antiabortion and don't use the label/term "prolife", then I won't bring the war up. How can someone be "prolife" if they support killing innocent Iraqis?
When have I said I support killing innocent Iraqis? Stop putting words into my mouth or arguing strawmen. I did not bring the war up - YOU did. It is irrelevant. Stick to the subject. Or is that too hard for you?
"Now, are the Iraqi fetuses that Bush had bombed beginning in 2003 not as equal as the American fetuses? Different subject you say? Balderdash if you do."
I asked a question back then. Did I say you supported killing innocent Iraqis?
Then you need to be more specific. The first part of that post is most certainly a response to ME specifically so it is not unreasonable for me to conclude that the "you" later in the same post is also directed at me. But nevertheless, you are still hung up on something that you have not proven is relevant to the subject of abortion and I have given you a number of reasons why you have no justification to discuss it whatsoever. Rail against the war - fine. But do it somewhere else.
And I asked you a question back then too - but I'll ask it again a little differently - why do you deny equal rights to one class of humans by defining them as non-persons? Why do you hide behind the banner of 'choice' - all the while denying choice to others? My friend, hypocrisy is in your mirror when you look at it next.
Excellent video. Reminds me of the Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade (U.S.), who got a job in an abortion clinic after the case and had all kinds of horrible experiences. She is now pro-life and is seeking to overturn the decision that bears her name.
NorthDallasForty, I think we are talking a little bit more than someone who just "wants attention." Have you read interviews with her? Have you seen her speak? Have you heard how clearly and eloquently she expresses yourself. Sorry, but your accusatory and dismissive attitude toward McCorvey does not change the fact that she is pro-life and is seeking to overturn the decision that bears her name. That even Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade is now pro-life should tell us something!
I know what I am talking about when I say what I did. She was an embarrassment to the prochoice movement in the public relations area, and wasn't getting the attention she craved. I know her personally, and can tell you she was vulnerable to the "prolife" movement because of that.
NorthDallasForty , I really wonder if you know her personally. In any event, that you say she was vulnerable makes sense, because she asserts that she was very vulnerable to the pro-abortion movement, and they merely used her to get what they want, but they gave her no extra assistance. As soon as the case was over, they got her a job killing the unborn and wiped their hands clean of her. So much for "pro-woman."
Yes, I know her personally. She's but a tool now for Flip Benham and his control freaks. There is no "pro-abortion" movement. It's "pro-choice" or "pro-abortion rights".
Go fuck yourself, you fucking ape! Or should I say- stupid people with their population explosion cause they just like to have sex because it feels good, and they can't face the responsibility of their actions, and thousands of kids are born to single mothers whom don't even know whom the father is cause she's a whore.
That's why sex was created, freak. because it feels good. Even the Bible says sex isn't just to have children. You seem like you have a problem with sex. Sucks to be you.
Dude, I have no problem with sex or fucking any bad ass chick. I just have a problem with people not being responsible and having kids they can't support if they choose to let the innocent live if they decide to do what is right. But killing a conceived child is murder, no matter how it happened. I don't care what side you are on. A life is a life, sorry to say, alot of stupid people don't know the responsibility if they want to go all the way and fell good.
Some species indeed kill their young in times of absolute danger. But, I just can't think of any, offhand, who do it for fun. Besides humans, that is.
The wolverine is known to kill for sport. Many other animals will abandon the defenceless children for no apparant good reason. In some cases however, a different species of animal will adopt them! Dolphins are a fine example of an animal that shows altruistic behaviour.
The point is that it is natural and that many behaviors we deem to be specific to our species are not so unique. An example of how a wolverine kills for fun is that it will hunt and attack it's prey without feeding. It just kills for the sake of killing. Practice makes perfect perhaps. This really has little to do with abortion, just clarifying your comments.
What Joan Appleton is describing is demonic
possession, and without a doubt, George
Tiller, "The Baby Killer", was POSSESSED!!
icimblind 2 years ago
Thank you to everyone for expressing your views at the present. Please do your best to do so respectfully.
AbortedArtist 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Also don't include god with abortion. god has ordered countless genocides of men women AND children. It's only hypocritical too assume god gives a fuck about saving babies. This coming from an agnostic, no offence intended too those who might take offence.
(I just thought too myself, why the fuck am I even commenting on this? I must be really bored because either way I'm a guy and this has nothing too do with me.)
Vilemk0 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You may not like me saying this but abortion will never be illegal. It has been the court of last resort throughout all cultures and all of civilizations times. Making abortions illegal would only lead too botched abortions and women dying considering some women physically can't have a child. If pro lifers want to save lifes, support condoms and safe sex being taught in schools. Also don't support the death penalty since you'll only be contradicting yourselves.
Peace be with you, fuckers.
Vilemk0 2 years ago
You can't have a child or don't want them don't have them. Plain and simple.
shademurtagh 2 years ago
If you're saying don't have sex I'd rather kill my fuckin self to tell you the truth. Lmfao
Vilemk0 2 years ago
what a fucking retard you are , kill an innocent defensless infant who has done no wrong , but someone who has murdered children elderly people commited the most horrific crimes know to man and would do it again , you want to keep these people in prisons for life so taxpayers can pay for them , you truly are the skum of the earth , Liberalism is a mental disorder you support killing inocecnt defensless babys , but you want to keep the worst killers on earth locked up forever and pay for them
ste670ler 2 years ago
The excuse pro lifers often make is that all life is precious. In many murderers cases, I would blame society. [Although that is all subjective thinking.] After seeing your constructive criticism, (sarcasm) I believe I've earned the right of calling you troll. Your assumptions of me as a liberal are also wrong. Besides all that? Insulting me sure showed me what a mature thinker you are.
Yet that's another reason why youtube is a dead end for retarded arguments that will never go anywhere.
Vilemk0 2 years ago
I'd like to ask, what about the women's rights? You want to take over their bodies, over some unwanted parasite? What if the woman is raped? What if she physically can't have a child or she'll die? What if she can't afford a child financially? You want that innocent child to be brought into this world just to die of starvation? Are you going to hold her down and make her give birth? It's disgusting how strong your urge to control the actions of others around you is.
Like I said, pro death.
Vilemk0 2 years ago
so you look at a human growing in a womans body as a parasite?u sick fuck, there are countless couples who cant have children , that would do anything to have a child and they wouldcare less if the woman was raped , which is very rare that a woman gets pregnant from rape ,
and if the woman cant take care of the baby give it up for adoption you sick bitch where its a womans life or the babys is maybe 1 in 10,000 probably more like 1 in 100,000 even in that case its still gods desicion not mans
ste670ler 2 years ago
Some would dare call Tiller a "hero." To that, I say this:
"Oh, yeah. He WAS a hero...to tens of thousands of men who don't have to pay child support thanks to him!"
viper259 2 years ago 7
Words from someone who KNOWS THE TRUTH.
I procured more than 1 abortion over a 15 year period of time. I also know The Truth. The Lies EVERY MILL TELLS YOUNG WOMEN/GIRLS...
Sure. Rationalize it any way u want. Rational Lies. The CHOICE women have IS NOT ONE WANTS TO MAKE.
Murdering the unborn is just that. No debate.
Redaheadful 2 years ago 5
This madness will not end until abortion is punished with a swift and sure hanging.
d2146498 2 years ago 4
If a conjioned twin is inside of you, obviously it would have to be removed or you would both die. What is being discussed here are viable babies that could be delivered.The women can't be arrested because abortion is legal. Your argument just muddies the water.
BOPPJONSER 2 years ago
Lets refer to the extreme anti-abortion movement murderers by their proper name - CONSERVATIVES!
All abortion doctor killers of the 90s were Conservative. Timothy McVeigh - Conservative! Torture advocates - Conservative! Secessionists - Conservative!
Dont forget what Conservatives stand for during the upcoming elections! Americans must continue to remove them from our government in 2010/12, just like we did in 2006/08! Conservatism is a cult - how much more evidence do we need?!
halette20001 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i have good news and bad news for this lady
Bad news: you're bat shit crazy, and everything you've said is completely untrue!
Good news; if you got a good pair of tits the Republicans might want you to run for President.
Thvndar 2 years ago
She used to be head nurse at an abortion clinic. What experience have you had? Abortion has been made out to be political in order to further divide and conquer.
Filmmaker777 2 years ago 4
Woah. O_o
DizzyDior12 2 years ago
Abortion is the ultimate act of cowardice in every regard.
HerecomesTheSun666 2 years ago 3
and you're only pro-life at the time you wrote this comment. i freely admit that i can't read minds.
that's why i listen to people.
uncleosbert 3 years ago
uncleosbert - What about serial killers that have no conscience or regrets afterwards. Does that make the murders right? Are we going to change the laws to protect the serial killers next because of the least common denominator of a criminal mind ? KKK members don't regret their actions either.
dawnthi 3 years ago
@ dawnthi
is this woman a serial killer? or did she do what the women who came seeking her services wanted her to do?
what about those women? are they murderers? should we arrest them?
how should this be handled? if i was born with a conjoined twin inside me, that will kill me if it's not removed (but can't survive on its own), is the doctor who saves me a murderer? where do you draw the line?
uncleosbert 3 years ago
so, the law has to change because you made bad choices? no one forced this person to be a nurse or perform abortions.
this is ridiculous. please see imnotsorry, for stories of brave women who are not ashamed of the choice they don't regret.
uncleosbert 3 years ago
Hey there.. I really liked what this lady had to say... my question is... when will this movie/documentary be completed?
LivingfortheFather 3 years ago
Hi,
I went all the way to Ireland to film this woman speak...
Feel free to subscribe to stay in the know. The film Aborted Artist is due out by next spring.
Other shorter projects will be released this fall all going well. It's been a tough battle!
AbortedArtist 3 years ago
wow.. must've been a long trip. I know it was worth it though.. thanks! Will subscribe to stay up to date. I don't know your stance on abortion, but you might want to check out and maybe even interview a group called Bound4Life. their based out of washington DC I think. you can find em on google.
LivingfortheFather 3 years ago
that loud child n the audience proves the pro-choice point
ali0tis 3 years ago
Thanks for this insight
TheGiftOfLife 3 years ago
Planned parenthood doesn't tell you that most women who have abortions will regret there abortions for the rest of there life.
DeanClark68 4 years ago
What evidence do you have for this claim?
fileboy2002 4 years ago
The evidence is the many women who have abortions and say on television that they regret it and regret for the rest of there lives. Look it up dumbass.
FaithsFreedom 3 years ago
That's a myth. Many women do regret them, but most of those are because of the attitudes of others toward them.
NorthDallasForty 3 years ago
Now THAT'S a myth. The women regret them do so because they come to realize fully the OBJECTIVE fact about abortion - the killing of another human being. It's the abortion proponents who hide facts and obfuscate. Like that idea that a fetus is not worthy of equal rights or is just 'a clump of cells'. Abortion supporters sell lies.
logofreetv 3 years ago
In your opinion.
Many women regret them; most do not. But, it's the WOMAN's decision, and not the male's or some controlling preacher's.
Now, are the Iraqi fetuses that Bush had bombed beginning in 2003 not as equal as the American fetuses? Different subject you say? Balderdash if you do.
NorthDallasForty 3 years ago
Did the bombs specifically seek out Iraqi fetuses did they? LOL! Stupid answer. Abortion is a very deliberate act towards a vulnerable human being in a country with supposedly amongst the best health care in the world. And as far as making 'decisions' goes, does the fetus get the same right to make any decisions? Ever heard of the concept of EQUAL rights? Abortion is about the DENIAL of rights. It is a human rights VIOLATION.
logofreetv 3 years ago
Logofreetv: No, but fetuses were killed. Spin your war support, though. It's what your "prolifers" do well. Now, if the fetus is equal to a born child, I am sure you'll go against the "prolife" tide (nearly 99%) and support the same type of punishments for women who have illegal abortions as those who drown their born children (like Susan Smith did). Did you know about 99% of "prolifers" don't want women who seek or have illegal abortions to be punished? Sheer hypocrisy (but nothing new).
NorthDallasForty 3 years ago
The fetus is a human being. Period. It's only an after-the-fact definition of a 'person' that lets you THINK that abortion isn't actually murder, nevertheless, that's what it is. btw, nice little irrelevance about supporting war. And it logically follows because of...??? You can spin whatever you like, and change the subject too - but it's all about the powerful denying rights from the weak because they can. Abortion is murder of a vulnerable human being. And the murderers make money.
logofreetv 3 years ago
btw, why can't you see any difference between this:
Abortion is defined as the deliberate killing of a fetus by interfering with a pregnancy.
Does that sound like a definition of the War on Iraq to you? To ANYONE??? I guess in your mind it does.
And what EXACTLY is your point about women, abortion and punishment????
logofreetv 3 years ago
My point about the punishment of the women who seek abortions is that nearly all legislators who want to criminalize abortions, and most of the "prolifers", don't want to provide for the same punishment for those women as women who kill their born children. If the fetus is equal to the born child, then the women, not just the doctors, should be punished. But, as we know, hypocrisy is part of the "prolife" movement. More hypocrisy is found for those people who want rape and incest exceptions.
NorthDallasForty 3 years ago
You obviously don't understand that the law recognizes at the very least differences between perpetrators and accomplices, which it most certainly does. And I actually don't want exceptions for rape and incest - it only complicates matters for the women involved and it is wrong to commit another act of violence in an attempt to solve another. And you can parrot on with your name calling all you like - not bothered by it at all.
logofreetv 3 years ago
Wrong about perpetrators and accomplices. In nearly all states, the getaway driver is equally culpable to the bank robber. My comment about hypocrisy is true. If you truly believe the unborn is equal to the born, then the punishment should be consistent. But, the fact of the matter is you "prolifers" rationalize things. Anyway, I am just thankful Roe v. Wade is still in effect.
NorthDallasForty 3 years ago
I'm sorry, but the law DOES recognize differences between perpetrators and accomplices otherwise the terms are interchangeable, which they are not. I mean, why even have different words? Go find yourself a dictionary if it will help. The fact that for a given crime they decide to mete out the same punishment has no relevance to abortion. Different situation. The law also recognizes coercion and mitigating circumstances. You are really stretching here. Who's rationalizing???
logofreetv 3 years ago
@logofreetv
google the felony murder rule. you are totally wrong on this one, as usual.
uncleosbert 3 years ago
If you are prolife, you can't support the war on Iraq and be consistent. Unless, of course, you think can rationalize anything to suit your agenda. Iraq isn't a defense of our country--it was an act of aggression.
NorthDallasForty 3 years ago
I did not bring up the Iraqi war - you did. What I am pointing out to you is that bringing it up is IRRELEVANT. I'm not defending it or condoning it - just pointing out that it has no similarity whatsoever to abortion, except that people die (so what? people die from drowning or car crashes). Any justifications for war are a completely different argument. I've actually no interest in discussing it, beyond showing that your point is worthless. Stick to the subject, which is abortion.
logofreetv 3 years ago
No, the Iraqi war is not irrelevant. However, if you consider yourself antiabortion and don't use the label/term "prolife", then I won't bring the war up. How can someone be "prolife" if they support killing innocent Iraqis?
NorthDallasForty 3 years ago
When have I said I support killing innocent Iraqis? Stop putting words into my mouth or arguing strawmen. I did not bring the war up - YOU did. It is irrelevant. Stick to the subject. Or is that too hard for you?
logofreetv 3 years ago
Read my post that started the subject of Iraq:
"Now, are the Iraqi fetuses that Bush had bombed beginning in 2003 not as equal as the American fetuses? Different subject you say? Balderdash if you do."
I asked a question back then. Did I say you supported killing innocent Iraqis?
NorthDallasForty 3 years ago 2
YES! YOU DID! Your previous post:
"How can someone be "prolife" if they support killing innocent Iraqis?"
Get with it - you comparison has way too many differences to be valid - stick to the subject. I'll ask you again - is that too hard for you?
logofreetv 3 years ago
Yes, I did? Was I referring to YOU? Of course not. I was referring to individuals in general.
NorthDallasForty 3 years ago
Then you need to be more specific. The first part of that post is most certainly a response to ME specifically so it is not unreasonable for me to conclude that the "you" later in the same post is also directed at me. But nevertheless, you are still hung up on something that you have not proven is relevant to the subject of abortion and I have given you a number of reasons why you have no justification to discuss it whatsoever. Rail against the war - fine. But do it somewhere else.
logofreetv 3 years ago
And I asked you a question back then too - but I'll ask it again a little differently - why do you deny equal rights to one class of humans by defining them as non-persons? Why do you hide behind the banner of 'choice' - all the while denying choice to others? My friend, hypocrisy is in your mirror when you look at it next.
logofreetv 3 years ago
Excellent video. Reminds me of the Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade (U.S.), who got a job in an abortion clinic after the case and had all kinds of horrible experiences. She is now pro-life and is seeking to overturn the decision that bears her name.
chrisman737 4 years ago
Jane Roe (Norma McCorvey) will do anything to get attention. She's an alcoholic who craves attention.
NorthDallasForty 3 years ago
NorthDallasForty, I think we are talking a little bit more than someone who just "wants attention." Have you read interviews with her? Have you seen her speak? Have you heard how clearly and eloquently she expresses yourself. Sorry, but your accusatory and dismissive attitude toward McCorvey does not change the fact that she is pro-life and is seeking to overturn the decision that bears her name. That even Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade is now pro-life should tell us something!
chrisman737 3 years ago
I know what I am talking about when I say what I did. She was an embarrassment to the prochoice movement in the public relations area, and wasn't getting the attention she craved. I know her personally, and can tell you she was vulnerable to the "prolife" movement because of that.
NorthDallasForty 3 years ago
NorthDallasForty , I really wonder if you know her personally. In any event, that you say she was vulnerable makes sense, because she asserts that she was very vulnerable to the pro-abortion movement, and they merely used her to get what they want, but they gave her no extra assistance. As soon as the case was over, they got her a job killing the unborn and wiped their hands clean of her. So much for "pro-woman."
chrisman737 3 years ago
Yes, I know her personally. She's but a tool now for Flip Benham and his control freaks. There is no "pro-abortion" movement. It's "pro-choice" or "pro-abortion rights".
NorthDallasForty 3 years ago
Sterilization is in order here. Don't fuck if you don't want any kids. that is all there is to it.
RichAtCamp 4 years ago
Gawd, what a stupid comment. Do you only have sex to have kids, asshole? How many ppl have sex JUST to have kids?
Fuck off
PurrfectlyCute 4 years ago
Go fuck yourself, you fucking ape! Or should I say- stupid people with their population explosion cause they just like to have sex because it feels good, and they can't face the responsibility of their actions, and thousands of kids are born to single mothers whom don't even know whom the father is cause she's a whore.
RichAtCamp 4 years ago
That's why sex was created, freak. because it feels good. Even the Bible says sex isn't just to have children. You seem like you have a problem with sex. Sucks to be you.
PurrfectlyCute 4 years ago
Dude, I have no problem with sex or fucking any bad ass chick. I just have a problem with people not being responsible and having kids they can't support if they choose to let the innocent live if they decide to do what is right. But killing a conceived child is murder, no matter how it happened. I don't care what side you are on. A life is a life, sorry to say, alot of stupid people don't know the responsibility if they want to go all the way and fell good.
RichAtCamp 4 years ago 2
I lol'd.
Muffinz525 4 years ago
you win.
Buzztootight1990 3 years ago
did i win an internet?
Muffinz525 3 years ago
My friend, you won a thousand internets.
Buzztootight1990 3 years ago
awesome ty
Muffinz525 3 years ago
this is so good!
thank you!
thank you!
for posting this it is so well said!
roevswade 4 years ago
Sounds like she has an axe to grind. Too bad her comments are all hearsay without evidence.
takotheoktopus 4 years ago
God have mercy on his soul..
Woe to them that shed innocent blood.
Salvezza 4 years ago
This is the diabolical nature of abortion taken root in the mind of the abortionist.
MARLONBART 4 years ago
It's rare for a species to gratuitously kills its young. How did we get to this place?
Is abortion enlightened behaviour?
RogerOnTheRight 4 years ago
You should do your research, because quite a few animals destroy their young.
takotheoktopus 4 years ago
Some species indeed kill their young in times of absolute danger. But, I just can't think of any, offhand, who do it for fun. Besides humans, that is.
RogerOnTheRight 4 years ago
The wolverine is known to kill for sport. Many other animals will abandon the defenceless children for no apparant good reason. In some cases however, a different species of animal will adopt them! Dolphins are a fine example of an animal that shows altruistic behaviour.
takotheoktopus 4 years ago
How do we imagine wolverines engage in sport? Do they have hunt clubs and drink beer afterward.
I'm not sure where you are going with this, unless it is to suggest abortion is some sort of sanctioned sport.
RogerOnTheRight 4 years ago
The point is that it is natural and that many behaviors we deem to be specific to our species are not so unique. An example of how a wolverine kills for fun is that it will hunt and attack it's prey without feeding. It just kills for the sake of killing. Practice makes perfect perhaps. This really has little to do with abortion, just clarifying your comments.
takotheoktopus 4 years ago
Abortion souveneirs?
That's just unreal!
YaoTamashii 4 years ago