Free Clean Burning Energy

[violafinishda]

Free Energy is real but the coverup is strong, if you are interested in a REAL free energy machine then

just search for the LT MAGNET MOTOR in the youtube video search , it is probably the ONLY working magnet

motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!

[gaboferra88]

it has the same characteristic of browns gas (tiene las mismas caracteristicas que el gas brown

[shanghaikidx]

It remains a mystery to me, how people can "argue" with their brain being amputated:

- Of course they do not think for one second, otherwise they could find that in history 1000s so called Perpetuum Mobile existed & none of them worked.

- they take a YT video (!!!) as scientific evidence

- they apparently do not like or ignore any scientific methodology, but do not care either if a proof has given empirically and are not interested in why none of the so-called "free energy" "inventions: worked

[digitalenigma00]

Its not free it cost the biologically powered effort of the mechanical motions needed, thats not free its energy conversion IE: a shake flashlight! Im sure you realize this but average people might not. Technically even if hydrogen power was 100% efficent its not free by far because you need current induction to split the HH0 from the H20 so unless you can devise a perpetual set up such as m3141592 metioned its not free just far more efficent than current fossil fuel technologys.

[dodoshlodo]

Stanley Meyer was offered millions by NASA to buy out his technology (or to sit on it). He refused and was murdered when he planned to go commercial with a device that could be retrofitted to any engine.

We can argue about Physics Laws all day but the fact is ppl right now r running cars on 50% water 50% petrol. I dunno bout u but I need a fuel saving like that! regardless of whether we are producing overunity.

[m3141592]

They murdered him with a brain aneurysm? Like a Nasa guy drilled through his skull and fitted a pump? In a restaurant?

The point is, are there any cars which run on 100% HHO? And if there are, how much bigger than a standard electric car do their batteries have to be?

If a net energy gain can be achieved (more HHO produced than electricity used) then by definition it is overunity.

No we can't argue about physics all day, because that would require you to have some understanding of physics.

[m3141592]

Since dodoshlodo refuses to answer it, I invite others to consider:

What method or thought process do you use to work out whether something is true? Wanting it to be true isn't enough.

Try looking into the scientific method (works pretty well for this sort of thing).

[dodoshlodo]

wats your scientific method of resoning? "It must be bullshit because Thermodynamics tells me so!"

Please watch my videos of John Bedini,just click on my name. Tesla had discovered this idea of radiant energy 100years ago and wanted to supply theworld with free energy. His financier at the time JP Morgan said "if i cant put a meter on it i dont want to hear about it". Free clean energy is a threat to the energy giants of the world and that is why you dont see these things commercially today.

[m3141592]

My test for validity is evidence.

The more an idea disagrees with accepted theories which work just fine, the more evidence is needed to verify it.

A gross over-simplification, but that seems to be warranted given your obvious credulity and lack of scientific ability.

Like if I say cheese can cut glass I'd need to prove it, because previous experience indicates the contrary.

[m3141592]

Does anyone else see parallels with religion/superstition here?

Like telling a whole load of people that something they desperately hope for is possible but only through the secret which the priest/fraudster knows?

What method or thought process do you use to work out whether something is true? Wanting it to be true isn't enough.

Try looking into the scientific method (works pretty well for this sort of thing).

[dodoshlodo]

lol!

its not for wanting it to be true. Science should test all things and verify and prove them. Your arguments are based on nothing really, how can you argue with ppl that actually get out there and give it a go. that's what science is all about.. You would rather sit here and ridicule before even attempting to prove or disprove ones claims.

Einstein for years struggled to get his ideas recognized

[m3141592]

Science should test all things. This has never been tested by competent scientists.

You are mistaken about Einstien. It took a long time for the general public to hear about his ideas, but other scientists were immediately interested.

My suggestion to you is; get a small engine that runs on HHO and use it to power an alternator. Use the electricity from the alternator to make HHO. If you do this you've invented perpetual motion and will be a billionaire.

Then I will stand corrected.

[dodoshlodo]

Einsteins ideas were quickly shunned by the scientific community at the time, if it wasn't for Max Planck discovering him he would have stayed working at the patent office. Max himself didnt even beleive in his early ideas but thought there was something interesting in Einstein.

u can make the alternator power the cell which intern powers the car. It is an open loop system and doesn't break ThermoLaw. I've seen it with my very eyes! HHO is a fuel! u only need NRG to separate it,then burn fuel

[m3141592]

No, actually you just made that up about Einstein and Planck. In fact one of his first papers was basically a refinement of Planck's work.

"Open loop system" doesn't mean what you think it means, but that's irrelevant anyway.

As you say, you only need NRG (sic) to crack water to H and O. What you don't say is how much energy is needed. If less energy is needed than can be made by burning the HHO then it's perpetual motion.

Try it and post a video.

[m3141592]

At first I thought you didn't realize I was being sarcastic.

Now I see you were being sarcastic too. You were just doing an ironic impression of a retarded 10 year old. Well done. And a homophobic misogynist too! Bravo.

[dodoshlodo]

wtf are u talking about, u fail at life!

do some research into Stanley Meyer or Daniel Dingle or the Joe Cell. U dont know shit, so study up b4 u start knocking these HHO inventions

[m3141592]

Would you like to explain why this "invention" has never been proven by peer review or even reproduced by competent engineers or scientists?

It's just electrolysis, and has never been proven otherwise. Almost all of the scientific sounding terms in this video are mis-used, rendering it virtually meaningless.

The claim about hotter than the surface of the sun is also rubbish. HHO burns at less than 3000K (even for a stoichiometric mix) about half the temperature of the solar photosphere.

[dodoshlodo]

it hasn't been "proven" as you say because the scientific community is as ignorant as you are.

who gives a shit if it doesn't burn as hot as the sun, ppl run their cars on these hho cells..

I have a friend who has converted his corolla to run on 50%, hydroxy gas. It runs on water.

its not knew man, as i said, study stanley meyer

[m3141592]

I'm sure it's possible to run a car on HHO, what's at issue is how much electrical power it takes to make that much HHO.

I contend that the power required would be equal to or greater than that required to just run the car on electricity.

If this wasn't the case (and thermodynamics is wrong) then you could use the HHO to run a generator to make electricity. Then you could make more HHO with the electricity.

Has anyone done that? If this is real someone will have.

[dodoshlodo]

well then stop watching these vids and stop wasting your time. I have built a crude hho generator that runs on 12V pulsed dc car battery. and it produces hydrogen, not enough to run a car at this stage but it works.

Also I have built a Bedini motor that inputs 12V and outputs 140V. It can charge a battery quicker than the other battery consumes it.

its not breaking 1st thermo law, its creating radiant energy by extracting it from the vacuum. Nikola Tesla was one of the earliest to discover it

[m3141592]

As far as the convicted fraudster Stanley Meyer is concerned, none of his claimed inventions were ever verified by other researchers or proven.

I suppose those scientists could be lying because they don't want a technology that could save the world. Don't see why though.

Seems more likely he was either mistaken or just taking advantage of scientifically uneducated people to rip them off.

[ikekll]

Water-fuel car unveiled in Japan

watch?v=nU1AlYhj8bQ

June 15, 2008 (Less info)

"If this invention ever makes it to the market I'll be damned. Those in power who suppress technology since the days of Tesla will have ways to crush/buy-out/kill that small jap. company."

[ikekll]

BTW, FUCK off to ...

lol, you know who you aer!

[m3141592]

This is bullshit.

What none of them are telling you is the fact that it takes more energy to crack the H2O than burning the 2H+O produces.

All he's doing is changing energy from an invisible form to a visible and more impressive looking form.

If it was real he'd have a car that runs on only water without gasoline and prove it.

As it happens he's never done anything to prove it.

It's scandalous that this is on the news.

[masterxm16x]

wow ur a fucking idiot you are the bullshit

[m3141592]

Yes masterxm16x, I'm the idiot. Your masterful grasp of language has humiliated me. And your knowledge of physics is clearly beyond reproach.

I defer to your superior intellect. What was I thinking? Just because this is exactly the same as all the other something-for-nothing technologies which all turned out to be fraud, and there is no proof whatsoever offered here or anywhere else, why should that mean it isn't true?

[masterxm16x]

Exactly, now sit down gay bitch.

[dodoshlodo]

no it isn't u idiot, that is for conventional electrolysis - takes more nrg in than out, these machines use small power... the secret lies in resonance to split the water and not current like conventional.. I'm getting really sik of u knobs that dont know shit and haven't researched anything. The only thing u know is the conservation of nrg principle and thats all u have to stand on

[emosuol]

the gas company is doom

[mikeccuk2006]

gas company sell hydrogen in the middle of ocean :D

[P4k4er]

Its simple. Dont go to the government. Their a waste, we are 1000 times more powerful than them. GEt excited baby.

[P4k4er]

Lets get millions and millions communicating, lets organise and have our own system of living our lives one free energy. Run ur car of water, have free energy units in ur house. They only have their power because we buy their stupidly old and shitty products that pollute our beautiful planet. We out number these people 1000 fold, and its not a war, we just ignore their bullshit now. NOW

[mijal43]

us gov is in bed with the arabs,,, ya know bush-oil= no progress

[emosuol]

the world must know

humm i herd he was killed on a plane

[zyby]

Stanley Meyers successfully developed HHO technology years ago. He refused to sell-out & was 'discredited' before being murdered. His patents were then taken by the authorities. You're hearing about HHO on propaganda stations like FOX because this is now government policy. This man's crude technology is being used to get us used to the idea that HHO will come on stream in future with the blessing of government/corporations - to explain away an economic crisis & credit a new technology cure.

[fennmeister]

Stan meyer did the same thing, and they KILLED him for it.

[xenoalien]

Yeah, the Arabs need to sit back and let alternative energy be intigrated into transportation. And the US Gov need to stop being wimps and letting rich monkeys stop the production of alternative energy!