Added: 1 year ago
From: mackyfr
Views: 73,265
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (159)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Anyone looking to grow their Youtube Channel maybe I can help

  • Chrysler will never make cars like that ever again :(

  • @sharathshine It has... look up dragtimesinfo or m5board on youtube mkay?

  • @sharathshine the viper looked great beating the german sports car

  • Mmmm yummy my favourite american car :D

  • 90s VIPER GTS = timeless, beautiful piece of american big block engineering - and still ass kicking performance!

    C63 AMG = produced since 2007 so it´s a relatively new car developing 550+hp (this one as it´s got ecu mod) through an AUTOMATIC

    VIPER GTS = around 450hp (as this one got headers) through a MANUAL

    german engineering = new car, no shifts, 100 more hp and still losing even with an obvious headstart :)

  • @3O2MuStAnG C63 with 550HP? since when does ECU give NA car 100HP increase? let me know i want it. C53 might be pushing 500hp second C63 is twice as heavy as GTS third viper has oversize 8.0L engine that makes 4XX hp LOL third viper is a 2 door super car while C63 is a 4 door family car you make not valid point whats so ever

  • @nawzy202 correct me if I´m wrong but doesn´t a stock first/sec gen C63 AMG develop 480bhp/530bhp through a fast shifting automatic? now add the ecu mod and you´re in the 550bhp range depending on the model. and don´t forget the viper engine develops its 400bhp @ zero stress. the engine is nowhere near its limit at 400bhp as those 8.0L are properly built. there´s been an aggressive yet NATURALLY ASPIRATED viper gts pump gas package rated at close to 800 horsepower - never forget that.

  • @3O2MuStAnG I have seen C63 make 510-520 on ECU but not 550 and yet don't forget even though C is small it weights around 4000lbs which is pretty heavy for its size. Viper is about 600-700LBS lighter. And lets now forget C63 was never meant to go against cars like vipers and 911 or M6 it was design to go against M3 and RS4 and its still can hang with cars like vipers and M5 which is impressive. The new C63 will have around 530hp stock and 570HP with performance package

  • @nawzy202 thats not quite hanging with a viper. thats a GTS... 450hp. good for the C63 thats its hanging with a GTS but it would loose bad to a 1st gen SRT10, and get murdered by the 2nd gen SRT10

  • @nawzy202 also... the coment you made on the vipers engine, yes its 8L why... because its a N/A engine. built like a rock and strong. without any interal mods you can safly handle 700hp easy, little to no engine can handle that without a single internal mod. and above all. run on pump gas due to its low compression.

    and noooo the viper is far from a super car. tho the ACR performs like one, the regular srt10 vipers arent exactly track stars. only the ACR is.

  • Actually amgs handle better same with Porsche and M cars the new e63 and cls 63 v8tt beats the cts v in any performance category and that's FACT. The standard c63 has beaten the ctsv around every track they have been compared on.

  • Were those the Japanese guys from Cannonball Run?

  • Viper couldn't pull up in time for the right turn!

  • 1 dislike fuck you

  • worlds lamest race

  • no one has money and taste buys american, there outdated, they have there little followings and thats it, the world will take all there sales, down with gm

  • @ggiizzmmo Holy shit,someone needs to learn how to spell. A few grammar lessons wouldn't hurt either.

  • @thybigballs Holy shit, someone is judgemental, have you considered he might not be from an english speaking country? Did his comment hurt you and you couldn't find anything clever to say instead so you made fun of his english skills? If you find anything wrong with my english reply in icelandic and we'll see how it goes :)

  • @MrViktordagur Hey asshole, maybe you should look at his post and see who's judgemental. Now, fuck off!

  • @thybigballs Good going man, a little mad are we? Seriously, did his opinion on american cars hurt you personally? You should really stop taking these kind of hater comments seriously, they are mainly made to piss off people like you, which he succeeded at. The best reply to these kind of comments is a solid argument proving the person wrong.

  • @MrViktordagur Dude, really with the bullshit psychology? Fuck off. Hows that for advice?

  • @thybigballs Just facts man. And I didn't ask for your advice, but thanks for trying.

  • man that viper looks nice. i prefer the older models rather than the new srt models

  • @asshatnowhere159 agree with that there

  • The fact that the GTS is from 1996-1997 is just amazing.

  • Wow, pretty good for the Viper. Winning with his windows down like that creating all that extra drag and still winning the race. Pretty impressive.

  • the merc is like 20 yrs newer to

  • oh filthy, i was sure the benz would win that

  • From mercedes i only like mclaren , only , the rest of mercedes are the rest

  • @TheNoobYan but you're a noob bro

  • @320bit and likewise, the base corvette was limited to 186, the zo6 was limited to 197, STOCK. what could a STOCK c32 AMG do? None of this bs about "with the limiter removed". 100% stock. 140? 145? Thought so.

  • @Milehighsnake98 Well in that case then theres no german saloon that can do over 155mph, since they are all limited to that from the factory. Your such a dumbshit.

  • @320bit I'm not the one claiming a 13 second car beats 11 second cars, so who's the dumbshit?

  • @Milehighsnake98 I dont see either the vette or viper running 11s on paper. And I sure as hell dont see ANY videos on youtube of either of those cars running stock times. They are all with drag radials. Which obviously will make a huge difference on times.

  • @320bit sorry pal, but unlike you, I DID look it up. Fastest 1/4 time on drag times is a 13.29. A 1006 mustang cobra could go 13.30, with a "0-60" time of 5.4. The 02 viper was, at a minimum, 450hp, 490lbft. And could do a best 1/4 of 11.67, top speed of 202. It's one to like your car, but you can't represent it for something it isnt. For a 4 door it was decently quick. But it couldn't keep up with the corvette or viper.

  • @Milehighsnake98 02 viper cant go either 202 or 11.67 you idiot the 2002 had 450h.p and was a 12.2 cae at best and top speed was closer to 186 or so get your facts straight .

  • @camirocz Uhhh, no. You're dead wrong. First, a look on dragtimes or youtube will find videos of stock Vipers going mid 11s. Second, Vipers have better traction than corvettes, and Ranger (on here) got a 405hp ZO6 to an 11.9 bone stock. And yes, the top speed is 202. You should really do some real research and not just read magazines like Motor Trend before spouting off to me about being wrong.

  • @Milehighsnake98 a gts with 450 h.p does nopt run 202 mph you idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!the 600 h.p viper 2008 ,09 does 202 mph if i listen to your stupidities then 450 does 202 and the 600 h.p one does what??????300mph??????no viper wioth 450 h.p hitting 11.67 either thats bullshit.

  • @Milehighsnake98 Actually, the C32 does 13.1 second quarters stock. With a good launch Im sure that could bring into the high 12s. And thats a 3.2L V6 with nothing more than a supercharger running 350hp in a 3400lb car.

  • @320bit And a C5 ZO6 could go 11.9 with a good driver, a Viper would go 11.6 with a good driver. Fastest Dragtimes C32 AMG is a 13.29@105.8. So in other words, the same as a 1996 Mustang Cobra with a good driver. Which, by the way, trapped about 103mph, and ran the same ET. So that means it's SLOWER 0-60, (the cobra is rated at 5.4, but only an idiot quotes an inaccurately measurable time), with the higher trap means it picks up more AFTER 60.

  • @Milehighsnake98 Mustangs are trash.

  • @320bit Are they? Mustang boss? GT500? I wouldn't be surprised if the GT500 2013 will go around the nürburgring under 7:30.

  • @ohedd Yup. All trash. Sound nice, but are slow and poorly built.

  • @320bit Nope. They are price worthy yet extremely quick, they look stunning and now they are handling too. I'd say european everyday cars in the same price range are the shitty ones.

  • @ohedd Handling? With stone age suspension? Yeah right. Id rather own a z28 cavalier or ford probe GT before Id ever buy a Mustang. Thats how ugly and slow they are.

  • @320bit Stone age suspension? Is that why the boss laps Laguna Seca quicker than a 5.2 fsi R8 and a 911 GT3? The mustang is a four seater too.. In 2012 the GT500 will go for $60,000 and I guarantee it's gonna be the fastest thing around nordschleife in its price range.

  • @ohedd Good luck on it beating the Nissan GTR.

  • @320bit That's your measure of wethear a car is good or not? If it beats a GT-R or not? Then the Corvette and the viper ACR are like the only good cars inte world as they beat the GT-R... However the Boss beat the $30k more expensive 08' GT-R, even though the GT-R has 30 more bhp. The 11' GT-R did however beat the boss, but it's more than twice the price and has 80 more bhp. I'm sorry, it's fact.

  • @ohedd Mustangs are garbage. Get over yourself. They have never beaten a GTR, and never will. They can hardly beat my car around the track let alone a real race car.

  • @320bit Why would I agree with you when I'm right and you can't prove me wrong? And yes it's better than the GT-R 08' even though it's more powerful and a lot more expensive. The boss has 1:39:50 around Laguna Seca and the GT-R 08' has 1:40:45. Tests are conducted by 'Motor Trend' and 'Road and Track'.

  • @ohedd Oh and Mustangs are not "4 seaters". They may sit 4 people, but they only have 2 doors which makes them all the same a coupe. And sad thing is, theres plenty of 4 door sedans that will beat it.

  • @320bit The cadillac cts-v is the fastest four-door in the world and it has 1:43 around Laguna seca and 7:59 around Nürburgring. GT-R is the fastest four-seater in the world so far and Viper ACR is the fastest two seater (amongst the relatively reasonably priced cars out there). The boss isn't as fast, but that's because it's not as powerful and not as expensive. I'm telling you, GT500 2013 will definately close down on the more expensive GT-R and its times around nordschleife.

  • @ohedd The CTSV is not the fastest 4 door in the world. You guys need to stop listening to this propaganda. The C63 is faster, and the E55 is wayyy faster and the CL63 Brabus is the fastest 4 door for the past 6 years straight. And the Viper ACR is very far from the fastest 2 seater. The SL65 Black will destroy it.

  • @ohedd Sorry, CLS63 Brabus.

  • @320bit Hahahaha what are you talking about? The CTS-V is the fastest four door around the Nürburgring. Google it! The best Mercedes is SLS AMG and it has 7:40 around the ring and 1:38:82 around Laguna Seca (Boss has 1:39:50 and has 125 less bhp and is about 1/5 the price). Viper ACR has 7:12 something around the ring and and only Gumpert apollo (about $400k) and Radical SR8 (have you seen what it looks like!?!?) is quicker. It's the quickest reasonably priced sports car in the world.

  • @ohedd I dont care how fast it is around a track. You dont buy a Mercedes to go around a track. You buy an AMG to smoke kids at stop lights. In a straight line, the Mercedes is faster than the cadillac. Around a track, that all depends on the driver more than anything else.

  • @320bit But most importantly: Mustangs are good cars and I promise you can't provide any info that suggests otherwise. That Top Gear bolony of american cars being bad and all that just isn't true..

  • @ohedd When I can smoke a 2005 GT500 from a roll in my 97 Mercedes, then I would have to say Mustangs are complete garbage.

  • @320bit This C63 obviouslygot smoked by a 96' dodge...

  • @ohedd That was also from a roll. And look how long it took for the viper to pass the 63.....they were probably doing well over 100mph before the viper passed it.

  • @320bit Ok then we are different. I value a RWD car for good drivers, I want a car with a mad back end where you need to be good to get it right. Not just a dummies pedal to the floor type of car where the car drives for you. If you want a good dragracer you can just tune an old volvo and beat just about anything. Good racing is where good engineering comes in. I think most people value the Nürburgring laptime higher than the 1/4 mile. Black series is extremely pretty though.

  • @ohedd If your driving the car around a track yourself then yes. But you cant just go off times that other people have done, cuz that doesnt say much about the car as it does the driver. Its hard to fuck up a quarter mile drag, its really easy to lose time on a track.

  • @320bit as a motocross racer and car nut, E55, '06, I couldn't agree more. :-)

  • @320bit A drag race in a Corvette is like rocket science, but if you do it right it'll beat the 4WD GT-R.. And the combination of a good driver and a wild car, such as the SRT10 ACR and the ZR1 consequently results in better lap times than in japanese cars. Lap times is a very big deal. Just compare Le Mans with the drag racing world champs or whatever. It's about the lap times.

  • @ohedd corvette ZR1--General Motors conducted test,[13] base specification car with optional super-slick track DOT competition tires (Michelin Pilot Sport Cup Zero Pressure)[14] and non-stock safety equipment including a roll cage equipped, video confirmed.Same goes 4 the zo6 and the viper :) they also know lap times are important for publicity..

  • @murphyloi Yeah but on Laguna Seca tests are conducted by magazines. And those Tires are original. Nissan also conducted their laps..

  • @ohedd my point was that the tyres are r compund optional ones..all the others used normal tyres..they needed the publicity and they got it by any means necessary..

  • @murphyloi Sorry man, I thought you were the last guy I discussed with! Hmm, weird they said on a video they will be standard in the 2012 version. "Any means necessary"? I mean it was a legitimate lap and they were the quickest!

  • @ohedd youre' right it was legitimate,what i'm not completely ok with is just that little edge that was needed to get above their rivals on the ring list :) they made it standard now,so that "haters" like me can't say anymore they used optional tyres to lap the ring lol..all in all i'd love me some american muscle,japanese technology or european supercar,they all make great machines only each their own way..:)

  • @murphyloi You are right. There are different cars out there so we don't HAVE to argue. Yet we keep doing it lol.

  • @ohedd don't you find it funny that German/European fan boys always say that American cars suck and can't turn a corner. Then you share the FACTS with them and then they revert back to little children like 320bit and say, well you don't buy a Mercedes to go around a track, you buy an AMG to go in STRAIGHT LINE at stop lights. I have mad respect for BMW, Benz, Porsche, Ferrari, etc... but the facts are facts, Vipers rule the track, and CTS-V rules the track

  • @CTSV4MEE Hahaha yes, I have never in my life heard "Yeah but European cars is made for racing between the lights!" Haha. Yes ZR1, ACR and CTS-V are completely unmatched and they happen to be American! I'm European too and I admit our defeat in this area! BMW, merc and all of them are wonderful cars as well but in different ways :)

  • @320bit theyre not garbage, (former 94 GT) they just arent and AMG is all.

  • @Milehighsnake98 If you actually read up on some stuff, all the sources will tell you that the C32 was faster in acceleration than the z06, viper, and 911.

  • @320bit Again, I have actually been to a track and know what a car can do and can't. I don't talk incessantly about a car that is just average like it's a world beater. Even the 1992 Viper was faster than your precious C32 AMG, and that was "Just" 400hp. Quick Fact. A Viper is 450hp, 490ft-lb, 3300lbs in 2000, with a 345 width rear tire. Now if you think a 350hp V6 in a nearly 3600lb car (not 3400) is faster than a 450hp V10 in a 3300lb car, I want what you're smoking.

  • @Milehighsnake98 I cant explain how the C32 is so fast with so little power in a little engine in a big car. But it is, and thats a fact. It was quite an amazing machine in its day, why Mercedes didnt push more out of that god like engine is beyond me. That V6 could handle 600hp+ all day the way it was built. It also had a 14.5psi twin screw.

  • True pull something out that's 15 years old and race the gts,... That's right you don't have shit on the viper for the price .... U loses hands down sorry.

  • no matter 4 doors or 10 doors the c63 is very new car comparing for this GTS is old !!!! so shut the hell up still amg got most powerful engine !!!

  • What I love about technology advancements. Not even 10 years ago there was practically nothing that could touch a Viper. V10 450HP. Now you have 4 door sedans running close with it. Granted a 4th Gen viper would rape the Benz but in general it's very exciting to live in the times we do with huge power being the norm.

  • @westy44cal Completely agree. We have 30mpg "Efficient" v6's putting out numbers v8's dreamed of 10 years ago, and managed to put out 5 years ago. I think I'm a little spoiled... Really hope these upcoming CAFE and EPA emission laws don't put a damper on all this!

  • @jctevere ...now even a 5.0 V8 is putting out 430hp, lol in the 90's they'd get what...like 200? Ugh..I miss my viper :(

  • @westy44cal In 2002 the corvette and the viper both were destroyed by the introduction of the C32 AMG. The fastest 4 door saloon of its day. 0-60 in around 4.5 seconds and top speed of over 190mph.

  • @320bit Not sure what you're drinking, but that didn't happen. The C32 AMG was about 349hp, 330ft-lb, in a 3600-3800lb car. The Viper was 450hp and 3300-3400lbs.  Sorry, but it wasn't beating the viper. Not saying it was a slow car, just saying much slower than the Viper. In fact, fastest C32 AMG was a 13.29 on dragtimes. Fastest 02 Viper was 11.60s. Not even close. The 1996 Mustang Cobra could go 13.3 with a really good driver.

  • @Milehighsnake98 Actually the C32 is about 3400lbs. And yes, it was faster than the base viper and base corvette. And in top speed it was faster than the viper and z06. The C32 runs 13.1s on the quarter mile. If you actually looked stuff up, youd see plenty of information on the performance of the C32 and how it compared to supercars of its day.

  • @Milehighsnake98 You realize the C32 could do over 190mph with the limiter removed when the viper and z06 could only do about 185mph.

  • @Milehighsnake98 And with a 0-60 of the mid 4 second range, the C32 with a good driver could accelerate faster or just as quick as both those cars.

  • @320bit c32??????Are you stupid or what it was a dog by todays standard well over 6 seconds 0 to 60 even the c43 couldnt do 4 seconds or even under 6.

  • @camirocz And Im the stupid one? The C32 did 0-60 in under 4.5 seconds which is fast even by todays standards and thats a 10 year old AMG with a 15 year old motor. And the C43 did 0-60 in 5.5 seconds so your wrong again. Good job.

  • @camirocz I just cant believe you made that comment. And why even bring the C43 into this? The C43 wasnt exactly a good car considering the massive engine it had in it, there really was never any fast 202 model it was the first era for the C Class and in the mid 90s they were built cheap so people could afford them.

  • Comment removed

  • I'd choose the viper over any mercedes but the SLR.

  • @telhacerta Technically the SLR is the german viper so you are persistent :)

  • @mkuroglu haha, no doubt about that xD

  • viiper fOr life...♥♥♥

  • I will own a 1st-gen GTS Viper blue with white stripes one day. I have wanted one since I was about 10.

  • An E60 M5 would have beaten that Viper! Go BMW

  • @krugerhw doubt it.

  • its funny how everybody has to hate a certain car.. yet 90% of you dont even own one of these beasts.. sure we have preferences but even if the car you hate so much wings against the car you love, i'm sure if somebody were to give you the car you hate so much for free, or for half price, you would think about getting it.

  • @sranjesuper couldnt agree more - i hate the haters! i love sportscar no matter what make!! (nissan gt-r owner...)

  • @mackyfr yep you see im an AMG fan but i would LOVE to drive a nissan gtr.. every car has its own purpose.. and personality.. that is what we have to appreciate.. people get too attached to cars and then they hate on other cars lol!

  • @sranjesuper These are my two favorite cars!

  • @sranjesuper No I would sell it for the one I love.Hahahaha

  • @sranjesuper yes because haters do 0-100 runs everyday 24hours so they dont know what a car can make you feel

  • Very fast for a 4 door, you cant really hear the Viper that well so its hard to tell how good he shifted the car since it has a 6 spd tranny.

  • You gotta love the C63 for it's "Stealthiness" , except for the deep growl ;)

  • V10 vs a V8.

    2 Door vs 4 Door.

    You get tha point..

  • buying a gtr says, hey i saw this car in forza and need for speed and i want one, mommy!!! buy me one!!!

    C63 says german badass....like the scorpions.

    but i prefer the e 63

  • Merc is good, viper is good and audi is shit

  • I would love to have the opportunity to take my Viper out on a closed airstrip

  • viper rules! open and glass on top, very niice.

  • oh lol nice fake bratuha!

  • People need to understand speed. PLEASE ALLOW ME TO EXPLAIN. BMW M1, M3, M5 and M6 are fast and great cars. The Mercedes C63 AMG, S65AMG are awesome beasts. Porsche 911 Turbo, GT2, GT3 and GT3 RS are amazing. How about the Corvette ZR1 and Z06? They are not slow breathers by any means. The Nissan GTR is faster then most cars out there. Speed costs money, question is how fast do you want to go. But in the end, it's all about looks. I'd rather show up in a BMW then a Nissan anyday at my own house.

  • @tomgunc I don't care what make a car has. If it's awesome and you like it, buy it!

    Sportscar for the win!!

  • @mackyfr Spoken like a true car enthusiast! Everyone has differing tastes when it comes to cars. Of course you like some better than others, but a real fan... a real fan of auto's can appreciate anything that looks great and goes fast. just because i own a Z06 doesn't mean i won't compliment someone with a sweet BMW or a tastefully done Supra. Long story short, both great cars in the vid

  • @Ten90z Couldn't have said it better myself.

  • @mackyfr And how old is that GTS.... Try that crap with a Generation 5 and prepare to be emberassed.

  • @tigertic1, it's embarrassed, not emberassed.

  • @mackyfr You know nothing about cars except how fast they can go. Learn about them, then your car MIGHT be able to be faster

  • @MustangXFJ Do you even know what car I got?

  • lmfaoooo and the viper's window is open

    noob mercedes

  • Can't wait for the new M5/6 :O!

  • Farrrk those mercs are quick!

  • Vipers still look good, IMO the original design (this one) looks better than the revised design. Dodge/Chrysler just cant stay away from making there cars look like trucks. the next viper (if theres a next) needs to be exotic again. not truck-like

  • i must say, the C63 amg is impressive. 4 door and that fast! such a great car

  • @ibrahimalghamdi94 then what would you think of the cadillac cts-v sedan? thats even fasterr! fastest sedan in the world!

  • @errenthovsep Far from the fastest sedan in the world...but it's a damn impressive car. I mean the Bentley, the Porsche and the Mercedes all make faster sedan.

  • @contagious6969 BMW ///M makes faster sedans as well, the e39 M5 was the world's fastest sedan when it came out, and also the e60 M5 was the world's fastest sedan when it first came out as well.

  • @Pitos07 No one cares what was the fastest sedan, I mean I own a m5 and I can tell you it is not the fastest sedan in the world. My statement is correct. Bentley, Porsche, and Mercedes all make faster sedans. The BMW is impressive but it is not faster than a new cts-v. And all of the above car manufactures make sedans quicker than the cts-v. So really the bmw is way behind now. Even with the new f10, I doubt it will even beat the cts-v. And if it does, it won't be by much.

  • @contagious6969 Thanks a lot .....you have crapped me out for the 4th of July weekend. Much appreciate it.

  • @ibrahimalghamdi94

    U know that the C63 has the ecu?

  • Viper not a good car? you've obviously never driven one.

    And bear in mind this Viper is from 1996. this C63 is from, what..2007-2008?10 years is a big time gap, and plenty of room for improvements -_-

  • @DVGTS1 Yeah the new ACR not only beat EVERY mercedes but just about every other car as well around the RING: Veyron, GT3, CGT SLR, LP640, MC12, ENZO, Z06, ZR1, Mclaren F1, All BMW's audi's and benzes...

    So yeah dont bad mouth the Viper!

  • haltet bloss alle die schnauze..

  • 4 door saloon with automatic gearbox keeps up with a 2 door sport car with manual. Thats GOOD. AMG for the win.

  • @2URBO2

    Not to mention the C63 AMG is half the price of the viper and a entry level AMG model. 2 wins for the AMG!

  • @dantos777 Good point my friend. And if you know what BRABUS is doing with those 6.2 liters in those days, you know what to do with the money you saved from the viper buy. Can you say twinturbo, and 750 hp? WUHU!!!! AMG is the KING.

  • @2URBO2 Thats not the new viper thats a 1999-2002 450hp you can pick up from 30-40grand still cheaper than a used c63amg you save yourself 15grand when you buy the viper.And you dont wanna no what twin turbos do to a viper lmao.

  • @dantos777 Thats not the new viper thats a 1999-2002 450hp you can pick up from 30-40grand still cheaper than a used c63amg you save yourself 15grand when you buy the viper.And you dont wanna no what twin turbos do to a viper lmao.

  • @larryadam2 I know, but still, the viper is not a good car. The C63 is.

  • @2URBO2 Dude the viper is a track car yes the amg beat it in the drag race but it would get crushed on a track and for 90grand the viper runs with the best.

  • @larryadam2 "dude", how often are common people on race tracks, contra normal road? There you go, enough reason to go for the C63.

  • @2URBO2 Still the viper won enough said viper better car because it was built for speed and plus the track amg needs to stick with racing m5s and rs.

  • @larryadam2 True, but my point was that this 4 door saloon could keep up with a 2 door sports car. And thats a well made car.

  • @larryadam2 "Viper won enough said" You should have stopped there. Viper is far from the better car.

  • @vipeme1 I stick with what i said C63s compete agaisnt m3,isf not a sports car.Have a great day.

  • @larryadam2 I like apples more than oranges, myself. Have a splendid evening.

  • r u dumb, its not a track car, viper handles like shit, the hood is massive and so is the engine under it, its more for drags

  • @ibrahimoviczlatan Vipers compete and win in American LeMans and FIA GT1 and GT2 with that chassis and engine. MB races the C-Class in the DTM series, and that car shares nothing with the steet car.

  • @2URBO2 well that viper is like 10+ years old ..

  • @Bmw545m So? Take a 10 year old AMG with the same horsepower, and race it.

  • @2URBO2 well the gearing etc. for better performance and handling on new cars compared to those who are 10+ years old..

  • @Bmw545m Yeah, but damn, the C63 is a saloon.

  • @2URBO2 well yea :) that's true.. and it's a killer

  • @Bmw545m It is. ^^

  • Lol, locked up brakes at the end.

  • CLS most beautiful car on planet !!!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more