12/7/11 IMPOSSIBLE Moon Landing Shot - Nasa Lies Exposed

[sciencenerdist]

Maximum moon temperature is 123C.

[Astrobrant2]

Who's the moron doing the talking? The thing on the hill was carried up there and was being carried back in the second part of the video.

It was not a different time or different day. Sibrel thought it was because someone, (not NASA), made a film with this clip and they put dubbed audio from another part of the mission. Charlie's comment about John standing on the edge of the crater did not occur here. Yes, I disagree with the film-maker's decision to misplace audio like that.

[secureteam10]

@Astrobrant2 Sibrel may be a wacky guy, but the footage he obtained, which clearly showed astronauts faking their 200,000+ mile distance from the earth, should more than sway you to the fact that the moon landings were more than what we were shown. Was it the blackness of space around the earth? No, it was the darkened inside of the LEM being shot from the back to make it seem like they were far from earth, when they were clearly in earth orbit, which can be seen from the earth shine afterwards

[Astrobrant2]

The reason nothing gets covered up is because the dust is being blown out at high speeds, (as should be evident.) Each dust particle, even microscopic ones, move as freely as if they were shot-puts, since there is no air on the moon. Most of them will end up from a hundred meters to a mile away. The lack of air is also why we see no billowing at all.

"The rover on the top of the hill"?? Raise your hand if you think that's a rover.

The video was being taken from the rover camera. (cont'd)

[secureteam10]

@Astrobrant2 Incorrect. The moon dust is not just being blown "outwards". The engine which blew straight down into the ground would blow dust outwards, but would also kick up dust up and around the bottom of the lander and lander legs. The fact that there is not even the slightest hint of a crater, nor a single molecule of dust anywhere on the lander, should be proof enough of fakery, however I've seen you on Jarrah's videos and know well that nothing can sway your diehard pro-Nasa mindset.

[grovegreener]

Exactly, samglo87. Shut them down.

[MassTransit999]

I mean...the fact remains....its the exact same location. I havent seen all of the footage to know if a scene was inserted or what...or stuff was edited. So anybody that says its two different spots is obviously blind, but I have no idea if maybe the two shots were filmed together during the same EVA.

[seansalvador1]

Parallax.



[secureteam10]

@seansalvador1 Not from several kilometers apart.

[seansalvador1]

@secureteam10

Yes, certainly from several kilometres apart... what on Earth makes you think that matters?

[secureteam10]

@seansalvador1 Because as the clip above shows, we aren't talking about mountains at odd angles. We're talking about the same exact set of rocks in two different places, supposedly kilometers apart, which they are obviously not.

[secureteam10]

@secureteam10 It's about Nasa and the astronauts claiming they are in one place, and then in another totally different place "kilometers" away, yet the hill and rocks they are walking around stay completely the same. It's one location made out to be two.

[seansalvador1]

@secureteam10 "Because as the clip above shows, we aren't talking about mountains at odd angles"

No, i was talking about parallax.

"We're talking about the same exact set of rocks"

Tell me exactly how you gauge the distance and height of those 'rocks'?

I'll tell you one way to do it in space: Parallax!

[secureteam10]

@seansalvador1 I'm sorry, but the issue is not how big these obvious rocks are, but that the astronauts claim to be in one place, and then supposedly "travel several kilometers" in the opposite direction to do a separate EVA, yet they are walking on the same exact location, with the same exact rocks, all the way down to the pebbles. Common sense should take over at this point.

[seansalvador1]

@secureteam10

"yet they are walking on the same exact location"

How do you know? If they are very large and very far away, then indeed they will look as though they have hardly moved (they do in fact move a little, and this movement is enough to judge the distance were we to know the size).

You may as well make the same claim if i were to take a photo in Cornwall and then one in London and claim that the stars looked the same in both therefore London is in Cornwall!

[secureteam10]

@seansalvador1 Your theory simply doesn't hold water here. The shots are supposedy filmed kilometers apart in the OPPOSITE direction. If you look at a lunar map of the area you will see that they are not simply filming the same location at a distance as you might with say stars. They are walking up a hill, and the size of the rocks can easily be judged by looking at the first part of the footage where you can see the lunar vehicle just behind the hill top, a few meters away. Blatant foul-up.

[seansalvador1]

@secureteam10 You claim the size and distance doesn't matter, yet immediately say "with the same exact rocks, all the way down to the pebbles", judging the size and distance of those 'rocks' (pebbles).

[Astrobrant2]

@secureteam10 This was all in one location and all at one time. If any of you hoax fans would go to the Apollo video archives, you can see that for yourself.

You will also see that the object in the background was carried up there and carried back, but "truth seekers," in all their grand honesty, make sure not to include that part of the video.

The *audio* in this clip came from another part of the mission. That was done by the people who made the film. (Not NASA).

[secureteam10]

@Astrobrant2 If that is the case then so be it. I do not blindly accept every piece of moon hoax footage out there, however I've seen in enough footage and evidence that IS rock solid in it's validity, and proves that at the very least, many portions of the apollo footage was faked and/or reshot. I'm not a moon landing denier, in fact I do have faith we did go, but if you look at certain shots and mechanics from all missions, there are simply things that do not fit, scientifically or physically.

[Lanlegend08]

Its all fake,always trying to be on top the truth is so obscured beyond belief..

[batfly]

Wait... the astronauts are telling the the truth! 2:00 "it's absolutely unreal!"

[sonofmabarker]

Keep'em coming!

[MJ12DAVE]

"There are unimaginable wonders [out there], for those who can remove some of Truth's protective layers" -- Astronaut Neil A. Armstrong, on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the Apollo 11 landing

[secureteam10]

@MJ12DAVE A very cryptic and (revealing) statement by a guilty man.. Thanks for watching

[MJ12DAVE]

The lie is different at every level! They went to the Moon. They covered up what they found that is why they had to film certain segments over on Earth. NASA it is time to come clean.

[sule988]

they should have caught it, but they didnt, it is easier to live in ignorance

[Grey1671]

Yes they should have caught this but fortunately THEY are incompetent as hell :))