Is it possible that gravity is the root of anti entropy. Bringing everything back into it fundamental state (star formation or black hole) then from that point the cycle starts again. What we need to discover is the end of life of the black hole. Maybe the black hole is the beginning of the end? Time starts in the black hole as it transfer energy into a parallel world. If we can calculate the mass of the universe can we assume that includes the matter contained stuck in a black hole.
How's this for a conundrum... If you do something, but there's no evidence of it happening and no-one and nothing remembers it, did it still happen? O.o
Speaking of arrows. Say you shoot an arrow at a target. Before the arrow makes it to the target, it must hit a halfway point. Before it hits that halfway point, it must make it halfway to that halfway point. And before that halfway to that halfway point, and so on and so forth an infinite amount of times. We know infinity is not possible, but it must surely achieve this to hit a target.
@rich1051414 Speaking of arrows and time. "Time flies like an arrow". Which word is the verb: time (plan, schedule), flies (moves through the air) or like (enjoy)?
@LiftMyEyes121 You are speaking gibberish, stop talking that gibberish, no one understand y-Whoa did that statue move? *blinks* OMG IT MOVED AGAIN. *blinks* *dissapears*
@LyperArts You are created a fallacy. The God of the Bible is the external Creator of the Universe,but before the Universe was,God was. And is. Beginning and the End. Also,yes it does..
I'm just wondering about the present. The moment future turns into past. It's almost like, if not exactly like a singularity. Infinitely small amount of time.
entropy? disorder? Nonsense! Everything is is in perfect order because cause and effect!
and effeacts are the causes of other effects. It's like a very,VERY complicated pool. probability should GTFO of science because everything can be explained with the right method given that we can measure the right(and all of the)variables. A coin toss is determined by the force and angle of the toss and not by chance. There is no disorder just lack of calculating power.
@ImperiustheGreat You must not have taken any upper level physics classes... everything this guy says is true. and on the quantum level probability is the driving factor. Look up the double slit experiment and you'll see that statistics is fundamentally a part of the function of light
@ImperiustheGreat There are many things you can't calculate in physics. The Uncertainty Principle determines that and it's what reigns upon all pseudo-random things that happen in the universe. Of course you can say the coin flipped the way it flipped because you analize the result and consider ways to determine future coin flips, and very accurately also. But as any quantum state is possible (only maybe not probable) you can't be exact ALL the time with any non-quantic theory.
@Tunatunatun human muscle cordination makes it seem impossible get the desired side in a coin flip. and beyond that the heterogenity of the air makes it seem even more impossible to calculate precisely, but it is very much possible.
I think you are misinterpreting the uncertainty principle, just because you can't observe a quantum particle without changing it desn't mean it is something else than it is.
in my opinion phisicists who belive in random chance are not real scientists.
@ImperiustheGreat Determinism, as modern physics defines many of the beliefs in many recognized physicists, like A. Einstein, is what you are refering to. It has been many times proved wrong by theoretical physicists in the latest decades.
I'm not implying "God plays dice with the Universe", I don't believe in God either. The coin will be flipped the way it was flipped according to the natural laws of motion and forces, true, mostly. Quantum tunneling can tell you quite a bit.
@ImperiustheGreat And precisely the second part is the fundamental thing about quantum physics. Without observing a particle's quantum state you can define many possibilities. By Pauli Exclusion it will only be one, and that one is what the particle "is". The superposition of all the quantum states should be considered to analize the whole particle's behaivor in time. Therefore we stand with probability and states that happen more often than others.
@ImperiustheGreat All Entropy does is make that harder and harder. There is a theoretical state called Maximum Entropy which is... bad. Luckily, the universe will (probably*) end before we get there.
*I do not claim to be able to speak for the possibility of supermassive fuel sources outside the observable universe keeping it going with radiation or collisions or whatever creepy properties that one Supermassive Object outside our range must have.
@faerielance as soon as you used the bible as a method to prove a theory, your theory lost all credibility. The bible is mostly fiction, so anything it says cannot be taken as fact.
@kanimo24 Where do you get the idea the Bible is mostly fiction? The Bible was written by actual people. The new testament disciples recorded the events they saw in there lifetime mainly what Jesus did. If most of it was fiction then they sure did a heck of a job creating a fictional Jesus and creating fictional lives for themselves in which they preached about and died for this "fiction"
On another note the "big bang theory" is still a theory. This means it's an idea that hasn't been proven yet. So you can't say for sure whether this is how the world was created or not.
@MonkeyNamedEric I went and looked this up. It appears I was using the wrong definition of the word theory when I said what I did. However I don't believe the concept of nothing exploding has been proven. How does nothing explode and then over a millions of years form into something orderly when things tend to decay more than they tend to create. To me an intelligent designer making things in a ordered state makes more sense then nothing exploding and that chaos turning into order.
This is just my idea based on truth. You can disagree. If an intelligent designer like God who always existed=eternity=no time created a perfect world this would be a state of order. Then as it says in the Bible Adam sinned thus he was cursed to die meaning now you have order going into disorder. So a perfect world under the curse of sin is now going into a state of disorder because Adam chose to disobey the one rule God gave to him. Time is in place because eventually everyone must die.
@JMaSsA11 My guess is that the universe can be treated as a closed and isolated system or subdivided in subsystems that can be considered at least closed system and so on. It is a very relevant question, the explanation I read from a Paul Davies book is that entropy in a frame of reference is one thing and the entropy under a gravitational field is another, the behavior of the system can be completely opposite to one another. Don´t know if that´s the final explanation, but it sound logical
Obviously the answer is that time is actually a big ball of wibbly wobbly timey wimey stuff. All you need to prove it is a thing that goes ding when there's stuff. A timey wimey detector if you will.
Seriously if you're one of those freaks who's going to try to say the big bang never happened, you can fuck off. You don't know what you're talking about, stop pretending that you do. Get out of here, if you really think you can prove your shitty claims then go to the scientific community and present there, or go somewhere people expect you. Don't ruin good science videos from people who have truly studied this.
@anticorncob6 all i believe is the big bang and my religion.
how did hydrogen and helium get in the universe in the first place?
i think god, Ala,whoever you worship put the objects for the big bang theory there and made it all happen if you disagree this is only what I believe thumbs up so people can see and stop arguing and being so stupid
Amazing that such smart people believe in the big bang. No one has ever seen a star form nor can anyone even begin to explain how gas can be compressed in a vacuum. Spontaneous generation was proven wrong many years ago yet life is believed to have started from non-life. Macro-evolution of change from one species to another has never been observed and since no new information is ever added to to any aminal's DNA it is proven impossible. Such nonsense is believed because the only alternative is..
@five4sythes The big bang and evolution are repeatedly supported facts that almost the entire scientific community agrees with. It would actually be a suprise to find a smart person who DOESN'T accept it. You have clearly been misinformed about this.
@anticorncob6 Thanks for the reply. If you really want to help me believe then show me how what I've stated is wrong about stars, spontaneous generation and macro-evolution. Just because the majority of people believe something means nothing. I have very good explanations as to why this unproven and unproveable theory exists, namely, most people choose to reject the only other alternative.
@five4sythes You don't seem to understand how evolution works. You CAN add new genes, look up "frameshift mutation". And macroevolution has been observed. Creationist websites are literally lying to support their claims, they're brainwashing you into thinking this nonsense is scientifically supported.
@anticorncob6 Mutations are always harmful and if it were possible that a mutation gave some benefit to an organism it would become diluted over time. There has never been one example of a beneficial mutation that could lead to anything resembling macro-evolution. You claim that macro-evolution has been observed although they say it takes thousands if not millions of years for it to happen. Don't you find it odd that when someone questions your theory you can only insult and provide no proof?
Go do some research, it's a bit ridiculous how it's 2012 in real life and people like you still exist. You can start at wikipedia, it has been shown to be reliable and one main rule is neutrality.
@anticorncob6 This is funny. You keep saying things like they are facts an provide no examples. Do you even realized that you base what you believe only on what you have been spoon fed your entire life? There are no facts to support evolution otherwise you would surely just name them and we would be don. Name one beneficial mutation that could lead to any species evolving into another. It is an impossibility. Spontaneous generation had to get it all started after you make stars of course.
@five4sythes You already poved you don't understand how evolution works, there is chromosome fusion and all that, do your research, I'm not wasting my time. Again I say, DO SOME RESEARCH!
@five4sythes I didn't want to get involved, but you know that evolution happens due to mutation, right? Being beneficial or not is a matter decided by the environment, that's how we evolve. Mutation is simply the name we give to when original genes are altered.
@Psvdm So species can evolve to higher species by harmful mutations? I have never heard that argument. Can you name any or provide any examples. I'm open to believing anything if there is proof. You tell me there is gravity and then show me things fall, I believe. You tell me I came from a monkey and provide not a shred of proof and I can show you things contrary to that, then why would I believe? Or any person for that matter? Mostly because there is only one alternative.
@five4sythes "I'm open to believing anything if there is proof."
No you're not, otherwise you would've accepted evolution long ago. You creationist fucks are so ignorant, we have actually found transitional fossils and traced DNA back, yet you just ignore it all and claim it's not there.
@anticorncob6 You're fun... But you seem a little upset. Maybe you need a time out? Get some TP to wipe that potty mouth? Maybe read a book or 2 so you actually have some basis for an argument? You can do it buddy!!!
@five4sythes Ok, I think you didn't get exactly what I said. What I mean is that DNA and RNA don't stay the same during an organism whole life. You see, cells have to suffer mitosis(duplicate) or else the organism won't develop. In this process, the cell duplicate it's DNA(and/or RNA, depends on the organism) and in this process, some of the information contained in these are lost due to the ph level inside the nucleus or other factors. (to be continued)
@five4sythes (...)So there are some enzymes to correct any failures that may happen during this process. And since most of our DNA is constituted of genes we don't even use to make any protein, most of these mistakes don't affect how the cell should work. However, if there's an error in the genes that say how a cell should replicate, then the organism might get cancer and so on. So, mutation randomly affect pretty much anything in our organism. It's random.(to be continued)
@five4sythes (...) so imagine that, there's a bunch of white rabbits in a hill. There's an earthquake and they get trapped in a place with a river and enough trees and food. They have lots of puppies and some are mutant ones that are all black due to a mutation in the genes that determine fur color when they were just an embryo. Let's assume that there are only 15 black ones in a population of 3000. Then, due to weather conditions, it gets really cold even with daylight.(to be continued)
@five4sythes (...)With the cold, all white ones die of hypothermia and the 15 black rabbits survive because they absorb more heat from the sunlight with their black fur. And that's evolution. The new mutated specie survive and keep having more and more puppies with more and more random mutations. That's how evolution works. It also only works with huge community of organisms. If there were less rabbits, maybe there wouldn't be any black rabbits at all. Mutation is a game of chance, get it?
@Psvdm Thanks for the reply and explanation. What you stated has never been observed in reality. There has never been a mutation that would change an animal so favorably. If the rabbits were born black it could only be due to information already existing in the gene pool. Such gene changes have never been shown to appear since they are so complex they appear to be impossible. How could this explain an eyeball? Asexual to sexual reproduction? And how would it all start from non life?
@five4sythes Yes, they are complex, but not impossible. There are a huge amount of diseases caused by mutations, such as down syndrome and Turner syndrome. It is known that our genes can be changed randomly at anytime, either by a mistake made by our body or by external influence. It is random, the possibilities are infinite. So a mutation can change an organism in any way. It's all about probability, you see. Want examples? The super bug.(to be continued)
@five4sythes (...) There are A LOT of bacteria around the world. And there are hundreds of bilions of the same specie. They procreate a lot and some thousands of bacteria get a mutation that change their shape, some others get a mutation that makes them die earlier and some other get a mutation that change their defense mechanism. So, we use antibiotics indiscriminately and we kill all the ones with the normal defense mechanism. There's no competition, and the mutated bacteria procreate at will.
@Psvdm The examples of diseases are harmful mutations which is the opposite of evolving to more complex species. The super bug bacteria already existed in the gene pool. They did not mutate to become immune to antibiotics and this would never cause them to change into a higher life form.Evolution does not make sense and has no proof and only believed because we are indoctrinated from birth. If you are serious about proving this to yourself get the cheap book Evolution Cruncher and prove it wrong
@five4sythes What do you mean by "already existed in the gene pool"? I still don't understand how you say that mutation can't be good for an organism. Look for Chromosomal abnormality in wikipedia to know how some mutations happen. I'm telling you, I studied a bit of genetics and evolution makes sense. You're just saying it's impossible for a "good mutation" to happen, but where's your argument? Mutation changes the genes, just that. It can be good or bad. Why don't you accept it?
@Psvdm Proof. The same reason you should reject it. There is no proof. If there was then you would not be giving me a hypothetical situation about colored rabbits, you would be giving the observed, tested, solid proof. But there is none. This theory breaks many laws, thermodynamics, spontaneous generation, gas laws that would never allow stars to form. So I have proof against it but not for it. Evolution is a faith that you must believe in without evidence. I choose to look at the facts.
@Psvdm They have done experiments with fruit flies to cause mutations over several generations but not one of them was beneficial or lasting. This is proof that mutations do not cause evolution. Yet others cite ideas of how evolution works and accept it as fact. That is not how science should work. EVEN IF there ever was a beneficial mutation in one animal (though there never has been) how would it last through several generations. If anyone has solid evidence I'd like to see it.
@five4sythes Those kind of experiments prove nothing. Evolution happens over milions and milions of years in large organisms(reproduce slowly than viruses/bacteria/other small life forms). And I have to ask, do you have the slightest knowledge of genetics? A normal human has 2n number of chromosomes in each cell except for the cells produced in meiosis(egg and sperm) which have n number of chromosomes. (to be continued)
@Psvdm Also, I'd like to tell you that I'm defending the idea of evolution and natural selection. I'm not saying anything about big-bang and what people like to call Macro evolution.
@five4sythes (...)In order for a new organism to be born, half of the chromosomes must come from his dad and half from his mom. That's how mutations last through generations... How can you say evolution is impossible if you don't know the basic of genetics? Really, you are asking how can mutations last through generations? Study genetics, understand how DNA/RNA work and then argue reasonably. All the "proofs" you are showing say nothing. Want a really cool proof of evolution? Again, super bug.
@five4sythes And I'm tired of trying to convince you. I'm trying to be reasonable and you only target me saying that I believe blindly in evolution and keep on saying the same thing on every comment. I've thought it through and come to the realization that evolution is possible and is likely to have happened. There's no conspiracy against religions that made evolution up just to say that god doesn't exist.(to be continued)
@five4sythes (...)Scientist back up this theory because they researched and came to the realization that it's probably what happened to humans and every specie in planet. And it is still happening, every time. We live evolution, it's a natural thing. Want a modern example? I can remember the super bug. And if you understand it, it MAKES SENSE. The only reason I can see for a person to be so sure that evolution didn't happen is that this person doesn't understand evolution. So does it make sense?
@five4sythes I'm going to go ahead and say right now that I do not have a whole lot of knowledge of evolution. I'm more into the physical sciences than biology and genetics.
Having said that, I would like the point out that just because there is no observable proof does not necessarily mean that the concept is false. An example would be when Einstien worked on an equation for general relativity and found that in order for it to work, the universe had to be expanding, even though(..)
@User2308117 This concept wasn't physically observed until years later. Another example would be Hawkings theorizing the existence of black holes even though none had ever been observed before. I'm not attempting to debate the validity of evolution. I just wanted to throw that point in there.
Completely off topic: When you have time, could you perhaps send me a PM going into the detail your argument against the possibility of the formation of stars? I don't want to debate it, I've just (..,)
@User2308117 There are gas laws that would never allow a star to form. Doing a search for the ideal gas law is a good place to start. Heat and vacuum causes gas to move further away from and cannot be overcome by the much weaker gravity that they possess. If you are willing to look at both sides of the story you will find that the theories out there are only put forth because the only alternative is special creation. All 5 theories of evolution are loaded with problems.
@five4sythes The explanation goes that they don´t start hot. the formula is PV=nRT where n and R are constants T is the temperature , so if the temperature is low ( My guess is that is terribly cold) there are no reasons to expect the gases to expand. After there is a great mass of gas that has formed in the center it starts heating following the same formula as P increases so does the Temperature. It doesn´t sound that far fetched to the point of thinking it would never happen.
@User2308117 That would work except that there is overwhelming proof against evolution ever occurring. As I've said it violates several laws, is not found in any fossils, is based on the idea that random harmful mutations can be about orderly and increasing complex life and so on and so forth. If anyone really cared to know the truth they would look at both sides. Most if not all evolutionary proofs in textbooks are known lies and propaganda. That is why the guy above doesn't bring any proof.
@five4sythes I would be interested in hear all sides, as long as they base their allegations in logical, observable evidence. I said evidence not facts, because evidence is more realistic, but it you any side can offer verifiable facts that is just great. If every writer of a science book or evolution book is lying please show me incontrovertible proof of this.
@am101171 The best known lie still in textbooks today is the idea that "Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny" The inventor of this was shown to be a fraud, convicted by his own university and science has since shown this to be wrong as well. Another is the idea that the Colorado River formed the grand canyon over millions of years when the center of it is a mile higher than the ends. Vesitgal organs, homologus structures, etc. All this and much more can be found through Google.
@five4sythes "ontogeny": I don´t see what is the problem as you said it has been proven wrong within science, you only need to look in wikipedia and it says that it was disproved. Grand Canyon: is this about evolution, I have to admit I don´t understand the point on this one. What about Vestigial organs and homologous structures. I have to be honest I am skeptical of your point of view. Anyways thanks for the subjects I did take a look on them.
@am101171 It was disproved and yet it is still taught in textbooks today. I was taught that when I was in school. Vestigal organs are used in textbooks to try to prove evolution, even though it is the opposite of it. They try to say small bones in the rear of whales used for reproduction used to be their feet when they were on land, etc. For both sides don't just go to Wikipedia, they are heavily evolution biased. Go to CreationWiki for the other side. Use that same skepticism for all views.
@five4sythes " Use that same skepticism for all views." Sure why not :). To be fair " Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny". I will take a look at creationWiki, but I have to say that if it is openly stated (not only in wikipedia) that the theory has been falsified, then there is no more to say about it. Now if it is being taught as schools it needs to be corrected.
@five4sythes Some teachers are just not updated enough or missinformed. I can tell you that I was taught in elementary public school that in spanish the letter v has a different sound than the letter b like in french, portuguese and english, though in spahish both letters are the same sound, and this is my mother tongue, So you can imagine how bad education can be, with out even needing great conspiracy theories on the work., luckily I was able to go to a private high school later on.
@cooladas Thanks! This proves the idea that there are basic kinds of plants and animals and no matter how much you try to change them they will always remain that same plant or animal. In the artice they purposely select certain types of corn to make more corn and thats all they ever get. Just like we can breed certain kinds of dogs. We will always end up with a dog. The small number of mutations (if any could be beneficial) are alway offset by genetic drift.
@five4sythes i face palmed.I think you severely misinterpreted the experiment. There are six strains of corn from a common ancestor. one strain was selected for high oil. one strain was selected for low oil. one strain was selected for high protein. and one was selected for low protein. halfway through the experiment 2 more strains were created by reversing the selection of a portion of the high protein strain. and reversing the selection of the low protein strain(....)
@cooladas if you look at the line graph you will see the protein measurments over time. you will see that the strain selected for high protein gradually rises in protein content and that the strain selected for low protein gradually declines in protein content. the ones selected for oil show evidence of genetic drift because they are not selected based on protein.
Nice video , everyone check out my channel and give me a shot (Subscribe) . First video comng soon in my channel so i will appriciate if you check the channel . Thanks
People are going to say that God created the low entropy state but this is a terrible argument. So are we going to say that God is of low entropy? He must be, because he created a low entropy universe. Now, who created God? God couldn't become low entropy by himself. This is called logic people. And don't start throwing that "God has always been there and there is no need for him to be made". You're just disproving your older point.
@cat101king Even if God did create the universe "in perfect order" (which in this context means an endless expanse of perfectly homogenous gas composed of evenly spaced hydrogen atoms), entropy could not be caused by human action, firstly because human biology could not operate without entropy and secondly because it is a necessary component of any non-contradictory set of physical laws. There are more ways for something to be disorderly than orderly. It's mathematical truth.
Matter don`t have to get more chaotic in time. dirt and water becomes leaf on a tree. and the 2th. law of thermothingy mostly only works inn closed systems. in space every direction seems the same because you have nothing to point at, the same goes for time. you need to compare it with something. and where it is matter you can. and last: you can find time in physics, for example: you can know where an electron is right now or where it is likely to be in the future.
@ANTIMONcom True, matter does not HAVE to undergo entropy. Entropy is a force, but it can be counteracted by using energy to perform work. An example: A cell is a highly ordered unit of molecules. It is a small pinprick of order in an increasingly chaotic universe. By expending energy to do work (in this case, a proton pump powered by phosphorylation using ATP) the cell can create order. The pump moves protons across its concentration gradient. The cell has to work to make order.
The by forcing the protons up their concentration gradient, the cell lowers the entropy around it, but it is natural for said protons to fall down the gradient (this is called diffusion). The proton can fall back across the mitochondrial membrane and turn a turbine protein (ATP synthase) to turn ADP into ATP. This means that although the cell restores order temporarily, it is natural for entropy to occur. Biology and physics are fun!
@HereIAmJugggernaut then what about natural things that happens because of the way molecules interact? example: oil in water. it does not mix cause water is polar and oil is not, this maces the oil separate from water and (usually) float. it does not cost energi. ones the oil is in the water they will remain separated.
Also, the concept of time is simply a representation of the elapsing laws of physics-- in other words, the laws of physics define what we call "time." like, what makes a clock tick? What causes a "day?" what holds together and operates the biological clock inside of us? It's all organized and determined by strict and perfectly measured laws of physics that define our universe! :O
Inevitable entropy and continuous expansion of the universe point to an organized, definite beginning of existence; to me it only makes sense that what caused the natural world to exist had to have been supernatural. If the big bang was an entirely physical/natural reaction, entropy SHOULD have ensued. But it didn't! Food for thought.
There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.
There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
Or time is only a perception of past experiences and potential experienced to come and we are all only here in the present moment choosing what next potential experience we would like to possibly manifest whether consciously or subconsciously in each moment.
Toeveryone I was 'arguing' with below (you know who you are). I'm sorry for any confusion and anger I may have caused. I didn't have my facts straight and should've before I even made my first comment. I would've been able to explain better if I was a 30 year old creation scientist with a PhD. But I'm not. I'm a 14 year old in high-school. Once again, sorry for the problems I caused and I will be praying for everyone that commented on my post and I will no longer be commenting on this page.
Is it possible that gravity is the root of anti entropy. Bringing everything back into it fundamental state (star formation or black hole) then from that point the cycle starts again. What we need to discover is the end of life of the black hole. Maybe the black hole is the beginning of the end? Time starts in the black hole as it transfer energy into a parallel world. If we can calculate the mass of the universe can we assume that includes the matter contained stuck in a black hole.
IAmAnAmazingDad 7 hours ago
How's this for a conundrum... If you do something, but there's no evidence of it happening and no-one and nothing remembers it, did it still happen? O.o
bobthetomato29 1 day ago
@bobthetomato29 That depends on whether YOU remember it, and what you think about Shroedinger's petcare.
InsaneMentalist 1 day ago
1:36 INCEPTION! (sorta)
OddOneOwt 2 days ago
Speaking of arrows. Say you shoot an arrow at a target. Before the arrow makes it to the target, it must hit a halfway point. Before it hits that halfway point, it must make it halfway to that halfway point. And before that halfway to that halfway point, and so on and so forth an infinite amount of times. We know infinity is not possible, but it must surely achieve this to hit a target.
rich1051414 3 days ago
@rich1051414 lol i've heard of this paradox before.
Ch33s3M6n 23 hours ago
@rich1051414 Speaking of arrows and time. "Time flies like an arrow". Which word is the verb: time (plan, schedule), flies (moves through the air) or like (enjoy)?
CBDiEvAl 8 hours ago in playlist MinutePhysics
@CBDiEvAl Flies... Time is a noun in that context, like is used as a preposition with arrow the noun used for comparison...
rich1051414 4 hours ago
@rich1051414 All 3 answers were correct. 1) Time the speed of flies as quickly as you can 2) Certain flies enjoy an arrow 3) Time goes by quickly.
en(dot)wikipedia(dot)org/wiki/Time_flies_like_an_arrow
CBDiEvAl 3 hours ago
@CBDiEvAl Clever
rich1051414 3 hours ago
such mundane back round music to such a important topic xD
10xXxtailedxXxdemon 3 days ago
So basically: time is a big ball of wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey stuff.
LiftMyEyes121 3 days ago 24
@LiftMyEyes121 You are speaking gibberish, stop talking that gibberish, no one understand y-Whoa did that statue move? *blinks* OMG IT MOVED AGAIN. *blinks* *dissapears*
ChrisERiley93098 3 days ago 5
lol uhhhh God? since we know nothing can create something.. (also that proves the Biblical account of Genesis where people lived longer lives)
TheCh1212 3 days ago
@TheCh1212 Rationality is strong with this one.
Unkonvinced 3 days ago
@TheCh1212 What created god? + it has nothing to do with human life length.
LyperArts 2 days ago
@LyperArts You are created a fallacy. The God of the Bible is the external Creator of the Universe,but before the Universe was,God was. And is. Beginning and the End. Also,yes it does..
TheCh1212 1 day ago
I think about like this- Clean room, 2 days later room dirty. :D
freeno75 4 days ago
@freeno75 entropy
TheSlackerkid114 3 days ago
I'm just wondering about the present. The moment future turns into past. It's almost like, if not exactly like a singularity. Infinitely small amount of time.
cjpatz 4 days ago
I'm glad I've decided to become a physicist because this shit is bananas. (But it really is not bananas, though.)
bldubl 4 days ago
chuck norris can remember the future.
tonebone8 5 days ago
Wait, wait, this guy is from caltech? Does that mean he knows Sheldon Cooper?
smileygirl123ish 5 days ago
@smileygirl123ish Dr. Sheldon Cooper.
PajaTheDuDe 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@smileygirl123ish Dr. Sheldon Cooper.
PajaTheDuDe 5 days ago
entropy? disorder? Nonsense! Everything is is in perfect order because cause and effect!
and effeacts are the causes of other effects. It's like a very,VERY complicated pool. probability should GTFO of science because everything can be explained with the right method given that we can measure the right(and all of the)variables. A coin toss is determined by the force and angle of the toss and not by chance. There is no disorder just lack of calculating power.
ImperiustheGreat 5 days ago
@ImperiustheGreat Dude, read more, talk much less. Soon!
tabaks 5 days ago
@ImperiustheGreat You must not have taken any upper level physics classes... everything this guy says is true. and on the quantum level probability is the driving factor. Look up the double slit experiment and you'll see that statistics is fundamentally a part of the function of light
thunder4315 5 days ago
@ImperiustheGreat There are many things you can't calculate in physics. The Uncertainty Principle determines that and it's what reigns upon all pseudo-random things that happen in the universe. Of course you can say the coin flipped the way it flipped because you analize the result and consider ways to determine future coin flips, and very accurately also. But as any quantum state is possible (only maybe not probable) you can't be exact ALL the time with any non-quantic theory.
Tunatunatun 5 days ago
@Tunatunatun human muscle cordination makes it seem impossible get the desired side in a coin flip. and beyond that the heterogenity of the air makes it seem even more impossible to calculate precisely, but it is very much possible.
I think you are misinterpreting the uncertainty principle, just because you can't observe a quantum particle without changing it desn't mean it is something else than it is.
in my opinion phisicists who belive in random chance are not real scientists.
ImperiustheGreat 5 days ago
@ImperiustheGreat True enough, but the uncertainty principle does apply to particles, doesn't it? Sorry if I sound like an idiot, I'm only 14..
MGray104 4 days ago
@ImperiustheGreat Determinism, as modern physics defines many of the beliefs in many recognized physicists, like A. Einstein, is what you are refering to. It has been many times proved wrong by theoretical physicists in the latest decades.
I'm not implying "God plays dice with the Universe", I don't believe in God either. The coin will be flipped the way it was flipped according to the natural laws of motion and forces, true, mostly. Quantum tunneling can tell you quite a bit.
Tunatunatun 4 days ago
@ImperiustheGreat And precisely the second part is the fundamental thing about quantum physics. Without observing a particle's quantum state you can define many possibilities. By Pauli Exclusion it will only be one, and that one is what the particle "is". The superposition of all the quantum states should be considered to analize the whole particle's behaivor in time. Therefore we stand with probability and states that happen more often than others.
Tunatunatun 4 days ago
@ImperiustheGreat All Entropy does is make that harder and harder. There is a theoretical state called Maximum Entropy which is... bad. Luckily, the universe will (probably*) end before we get there.
*I do not claim to be able to speak for the possibility of supermassive fuel sources outside the observable universe keeping it going with radiation or collisions or whatever creepy properties that one Supermassive Object outside our range must have.
InsaneMentalist 1 day ago
I remember the future.
HiPaCrIt16 5 days ago
@faerielance as soon as you used the bible as a method to prove a theory, your theory lost all credibility. The bible is mostly fiction, so anything it says cannot be taken as fact.
kanimo24 5 days ago
@kanimo24 Where do you get the idea the Bible is mostly fiction? The Bible was written by actual people. The new testament disciples recorded the events they saw in there lifetime mainly what Jesus did. If most of it was fiction then they sure did a heck of a job creating a fictional Jesus and creating fictional lives for themselves in which they preached about and died for this "fiction"
faerielance 5 days ago
time isn't a straight line, it's more like a big ball of . . . wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff . . .
muleFUEL1 5 days ago in playlist MinutePhysics
On another note the "big bang theory" is still a theory. This means it's an idea that hasn't been proven yet. So you can't say for sure whether this is how the world was created or not.
faerielance 5 days ago
@faerielance
You don't know what "theory" mean in science, do you?
MonkeyNamedEric 5 days ago
@MonkeyNamedEric I went and looked this up. It appears I was using the wrong definition of the word theory when I said what I did. However I don't believe the concept of nothing exploding has been proven. How does nothing explode and then over a millions of years form into something orderly when things tend to decay more than they tend to create. To me an intelligent designer making things in a ordered state makes more sense then nothing exploding and that chaos turning into order.
faerielance 5 days ago
This is just my idea based on truth. You can disagree. If an intelligent designer like God who always existed=eternity=no time created a perfect world this would be a state of order. Then as it says in the Bible Adam sinned thus he was cursed to die meaning now you have order going into disorder. So a perfect world under the curse of sin is now going into a state of disorder because Adam chose to disobey the one rule God gave to him. Time is in place because eventually everyone must die.
faerielance 6 days ago in playlist MinutePhysics
@faerielance Great example of divergent thinking :).
am101171 6 days ago
it was low becuz we werent screwing it up??
supermegasonic 6 days ago
I cant believe I understood this
chuyton 6 days ago
but entropy only takes place in a closed system, and there are many outside factors interfering. Where does that fit in?
JMaSsA11 1 week ago
Comment removed
am101171 1 week ago
Comment removed
am101171 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JMaSsA11 My guess is that the universe can be treated as a closed and isolated system or subdivided in subsystems that can be considered at least closed system and so on. It is a very relevant question, the explanation I read from a Paul Davies book is that entropy in a frame of reference is one thing and the entropy under a gravitational field is another, the behavior of the system can be completely opposite to one another. Don´t know if that´s the final explanation, but it sound logical
am101171 1 week ago
"...The Universe began in a Highly Ordered State."
Interesting.
frogsoda 1 week ago
Minutephysics used to not be Sean Carroll, like you, but then it took an arrow of time.
ChrisERiley93098 1 week ago
how many markers does he go through?
sirleungsalot 2 weeks ago
did your voice break??
drizzdark 2 weeks ago
Obviously the answer is that time is actually a big ball of wibbly wobbly timey wimey stuff. All you need to prove it is a thing that goes ding when there's stuff. A timey wimey detector if you will.
LOVER0girrl247 2 weeks ago in playlist MinutePhysics
@LOVER0girrl247 Thank you, Doctor.
americascarface 2 weeks ago
IF you could make yourself immune to the "disorder" would you be able to become immortal?
missnight16 2 weeks ago
1:26 Laplace
zluisz 2 weeks ago
i liked the base :x
gamer5122 2 weeks ago
I was gonna understand this video, but i took an arrow to the knee :D
KiwiTheBig 2 weeks ago
so the big bounce theory says first less entropy, then more, and then less, and then more, forever?
mechazaowa 2 weeks ago
this pretty much sums up every movie plot.
thechristophersean 2 weeks ago 23
what the fackkkkkk?!
TheRyanGalan 2 weeks ago
Seriously if you're one of those freaks who's going to try to say the big bang never happened, you can fuck off. You don't know what you're talking about, stop pretending that you do. Get out of here, if you really think you can prove your shitty claims then go to the scientific community and present there, or go somewhere people expect you. Don't ruin good science videos from people who have truly studied this.
anticorncob6 2 weeks ago
@anticorncob6 Oh and btw, I usually don't even mention creationists, I just found a creatard comment not too far down so I feel I need to say this.
anticorncob6 2 weeks ago
@anticorncob6 all i believe is the big bang and my religion.
how did hydrogen and helium get in the universe in the first place?
i think god, Ala,whoever you worship put the objects for the big bang theory there and made it all happen if you disagree this is only what I believe thumbs up so people can see and stop arguing and being so stupid
parkfilms1 2 weeks ago
Time is so cool.
anticorncob6 2 weeks ago
Amazing that such smart people believe in the big bang. No one has ever seen a star form nor can anyone even begin to explain how gas can be compressed in a vacuum. Spontaneous generation was proven wrong many years ago yet life is believed to have started from non-life. Macro-evolution of change from one species to another has never been observed and since no new information is ever added to to any aminal's DNA it is proven impossible. Such nonsense is believed because the only alternative is..
five4sythes 3 weeks ago in playlist MinutePhysics
@five4sythes The big bang and evolution are repeatedly supported facts that almost the entire scientific community agrees with. It would actually be a suprise to find a smart person who DOESN'T accept it. You have clearly been misinformed about this.
anticorncob6 2 weeks ago
@anticorncob6 Thanks for the reply. If you really want to help me believe then show me how what I've stated is wrong about stars, spontaneous generation and macro-evolution. Just because the majority of people believe something means nothing. I have very good explanations as to why this unproven and unproveable theory exists, namely, most people choose to reject the only other alternative.
five4sythes 2 weeks ago
@five4sythes You don't seem to understand how evolution works. You CAN add new genes, look up "frameshift mutation". And macroevolution has been observed. Creationist websites are literally lying to support their claims, they're brainwashing you into thinking this nonsense is scientifically supported.
anticorncob6 2 weeks ago
@anticorncob6 Mutations are always harmful and if it were possible that a mutation gave some benefit to an organism it would become diluted over time. There has never been one example of a beneficial mutation that could lead to anything resembling macro-evolution. You claim that macro-evolution has been observed although they say it takes thousands if not millions of years for it to happen. Don't you find it odd that when someone questions your theory you can only insult and provide no proof?
five4sythes 2 weeks ago
@five4sythes "Mutations are always harmful"
No they're not.
Go do some research, it's a bit ridiculous how it's 2012 in real life and people like you still exist. You can start at wikipedia, it has been shown to be reliable and one main rule is neutrality.
anticorncob6 2 weeks ago
@anticorncob6 This is funny. You keep saying things like they are facts an provide no examples. Do you even realized that you base what you believe only on what you have been spoon fed your entire life? There are no facts to support evolution otherwise you would surely just name them and we would be don. Name one beneficial mutation that could lead to any species evolving into another. It is an impossibility. Spontaneous generation had to get it all started after you make stars of course.
five4sythes 2 weeks ago
@five4sythes You already poved you don't understand how evolution works, there is chromosome fusion and all that, do your research, I'm not wasting my time. Again I say, DO SOME RESEARCH!
anticorncob6 2 weeks ago
@five4sythes I didn't want to get involved, but you know that evolution happens due to mutation, right? Being beneficial or not is a matter decided by the environment, that's how we evolve. Mutation is simply the name we give to when original genes are altered.
Psvdm 2 weeks ago in playlist MinutePhysics
@Psvdm So species can evolve to higher species by harmful mutations? I have never heard that argument. Can you name any or provide any examples. I'm open to believing anything if there is proof. You tell me there is gravity and then show me things fall, I believe. You tell me I came from a monkey and provide not a shred of proof and I can show you things contrary to that, then why would I believe? Or any person for that matter? Mostly because there is only one alternative.
five4sythes 2 weeks ago
@five4sythes "I'm open to believing anything if there is proof."
No you're not, otherwise you would've accepted evolution long ago. You creationist fucks are so ignorant, we have actually found transitional fossils and traced DNA back, yet you just ignore it all and claim it's not there.
anticorncob6 2 weeks ago
@anticorncob6 You're fun... But you seem a little upset. Maybe you need a time out? Get some TP to wipe that potty mouth? Maybe read a book or 2 so you actually have some basis for an argument? You can do it buddy!!!
five4sythes 2 weeks ago
@five4sythes "Maybe read a book or 2 so you actually have some basis for an argument?"
If so, you need to as well.
anticorncob6 2 weeks ago
@five4sythes Ok, I think you didn't get exactly what I said. What I mean is that DNA and RNA don't stay the same during an organism whole life. You see, cells have to suffer mitosis(duplicate) or else the organism won't develop. In this process, the cell duplicate it's DNA(and/or RNA, depends on the organism) and in this process, some of the information contained in these are lost due to the ph level inside the nucleus or other factors. (to be continued)
Psvdm 2 weeks ago
@five4sythes (...)So there are some enzymes to correct any failures that may happen during this process. And since most of our DNA is constituted of genes we don't even use to make any protein, most of these mistakes don't affect how the cell should work. However, if there's an error in the genes that say how a cell should replicate, then the organism might get cancer and so on. So, mutation randomly affect pretty much anything in our organism. It's random.(to be continued)
Psvdm 2 weeks ago
@five4sythes (...) so imagine that, there's a bunch of white rabbits in a hill. There's an earthquake and they get trapped in a place with a river and enough trees and food. They have lots of puppies and some are mutant ones that are all black due to a mutation in the genes that determine fur color when they were just an embryo. Let's assume that there are only 15 black ones in a population of 3000. Then, due to weather conditions, it gets really cold even with daylight.(to be continued)
Psvdm 2 weeks ago
@five4sythes (...)With the cold, all white ones die of hypothermia and the 15 black rabbits survive because they absorb more heat from the sunlight with their black fur. And that's evolution. The new mutated specie survive and keep having more and more puppies with more and more random mutations. That's how evolution works. It also only works with huge community of organisms. If there were less rabbits, maybe there wouldn't be any black rabbits at all. Mutation is a game of chance, get it?
Psvdm 2 weeks ago
@Psvdm Thanks for the reply and explanation. What you stated has never been observed in reality. There has never been a mutation that would change an animal so favorably. If the rabbits were born black it could only be due to information already existing in the gene pool. Such gene changes have never been shown to appear since they are so complex they appear to be impossible. How could this explain an eyeball? Asexual to sexual reproduction? And how would it all start from non life?
five4sythes 2 weeks ago
@five4sythes Yes, they are complex, but not impossible. There are a huge amount of diseases caused by mutations, such as down syndrome and Turner syndrome. It is known that our genes can be changed randomly at anytime, either by a mistake made by our body or by external influence. It is random, the possibilities are infinite. So a mutation can change an organism in any way. It's all about probability, you see. Want examples? The super bug.(to be continued)
Psvdm 1 week ago
@five4sythes (...) There are A LOT of bacteria around the world. And there are hundreds of bilions of the same specie. They procreate a lot and some thousands of bacteria get a mutation that change their shape, some others get a mutation that makes them die earlier and some other get a mutation that change their defense mechanism. So, we use antibiotics indiscriminately and we kill all the ones with the normal defense mechanism. There's no competition, and the mutated bacteria procreate at will.
Psvdm 1 week ago
@five4sythes There, super bug is a great example of evolution.
Psvdm 1 week ago
@Psvdm The examples of diseases are harmful mutations which is the opposite of evolving to more complex species. The super bug bacteria already existed in the gene pool. They did not mutate to become immune to antibiotics and this would never cause them to change into a higher life form.Evolution does not make sense and has no proof and only believed because we are indoctrinated from birth. If you are serious about proving this to yourself get the cheap book Evolution Cruncher and prove it wrong
five4sythes 1 week ago
@five4sythes What do you mean by "already existed in the gene pool"? I still don't understand how you say that mutation can't be good for an organism. Look for Chromosomal abnormality in wikipedia to know how some mutations happen. I'm telling you, I studied a bit of genetics and evolution makes sense. You're just saying it's impossible for a "good mutation" to happen, but where's your argument? Mutation changes the genes, just that. It can be good or bad. Why don't you accept it?
Psvdm 1 week ago
@Psvdm Proof. The same reason you should reject it. There is no proof. If there was then you would not be giving me a hypothetical situation about colored rabbits, you would be giving the observed, tested, solid proof. But there is none. This theory breaks many laws, thermodynamics, spontaneous generation, gas laws that would never allow stars to form. So I have proof against it but not for it. Evolution is a faith that you must believe in without evidence. I choose to look at the facts.
five4sythes 1 week ago
@Psvdm They have done experiments with fruit flies to cause mutations over several generations but not one of them was beneficial or lasting. This is proof that mutations do not cause evolution. Yet others cite ideas of how evolution works and accept it as fact. That is not how science should work. EVEN IF there ever was a beneficial mutation in one animal (though there never has been) how would it last through several generations. If anyone has solid evidence I'd like to see it.
five4sythes 1 week ago
@five4sythes Those kind of experiments prove nothing. Evolution happens over milions and milions of years in large organisms(reproduce slowly than viruses/bacteria/other small life forms). And I have to ask, do you have the slightest knowledge of genetics? A normal human has 2n number of chromosomes in each cell except for the cells produced in meiosis(egg and sperm) which have n number of chromosomes. (to be continued)
Psvdm 1 week ago
@Psvdm Also, I'd like to tell you that I'm defending the idea of evolution and natural selection. I'm not saying anything about big-bang and what people like to call Macro evolution.
Psvdm 1 week ago
@five4sythes (...)In order for a new organism to be born, half of the chromosomes must come from his dad and half from his mom. That's how mutations last through generations... How can you say evolution is impossible if you don't know the basic of genetics? Really, you are asking how can mutations last through generations? Study genetics, understand how DNA/RNA work and then argue reasonably. All the "proofs" you are showing say nothing. Want a really cool proof of evolution? Again, super bug.
Psvdm 1 week ago
@five4sythes And I'm tired of trying to convince you. I'm trying to be reasonable and you only target me saying that I believe blindly in evolution and keep on saying the same thing on every comment. I've thought it through and come to the realization that evolution is possible and is likely to have happened. There's no conspiracy against religions that made evolution up just to say that god doesn't exist.(to be continued)
Psvdm 1 week ago
@five4sythes (...)Scientist back up this theory because they researched and came to the realization that it's probably what happened to humans and every specie in planet. And it is still happening, every time. We live evolution, it's a natural thing. Want a modern example? I can remember the super bug. And if you understand it, it MAKES SENSE. The only reason I can see for a person to be so sure that evolution didn't happen is that this person doesn't understand evolution. So does it make sense?
Psvdm 1 week ago
@Psvdm Thanks for the conversation. Sorry to make you tired of trying to convine me. I hope everything goes well with you.
five4sythes 1 week ago
@five4sythes I'm going to go ahead and say right now that I do not have a whole lot of knowledge of evolution. I'm more into the physical sciences than biology and genetics.
Having said that, I would like the point out that just because there is no observable proof does not necessarily mean that the concept is false. An example would be when Einstien worked on an equation for general relativity and found that in order for it to work, the universe had to be expanding, even though(..)
User2308117 1 week ago
@User2308117 This concept wasn't physically observed until years later. Another example would be Hawkings theorizing the existence of black holes even though none had ever been observed before. I'm not attempting to debate the validity of evolution. I just wanted to throw that point in there.
Completely off topic: When you have time, could you perhaps send me a PM going into the detail your argument against the possibility of the formation of stars? I don't want to debate it, I've just (..,)
User2308117 1 week ago
@User2308117 (...) never heard that viewpoint before and I'm very interested in hearing it out.
Thanks in advance!
User2308117 1 week ago
@User2308117 There are gas laws that would never allow a star to form. Doing a search for the ideal gas law is a good place to start. Heat and vacuum causes gas to move further away from and cannot be overcome by the much weaker gravity that they possess. If you are willing to look at both sides of the story you will find that the theories out there are only put forth because the only alternative is special creation. All 5 theories of evolution are loaded with problems.
five4sythes 1 week ago
@five4sythes h t t p : / / science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/how-do-stars-form-and-evolve/
am101171 1 week ago
@five4sythes The explanation goes that they don´t start hot. the formula is PV=nRT where n and R are constants T is the temperature , so if the temperature is low ( My guess is that is terribly cold) there are no reasons to expect the gases to expand. After there is a great mass of gas that has formed in the center it starts heating following the same formula as P increases so does the Temperature. It doesn´t sound that far fetched to the point of thinking it would never happen.
am101171 1 week ago
@five4sythes Also there are computer models that replicate the process.
am101171 1 week ago
@User2308117 That would work except that there is overwhelming proof against evolution ever occurring. As I've said it violates several laws, is not found in any fossils, is based on the idea that random harmful mutations can be about orderly and increasing complex life and so on and so forth. If anyone really cared to know the truth they would look at both sides. Most if not all evolutionary proofs in textbooks are known lies and propaganda. That is why the guy above doesn't bring any proof.
five4sythes 1 week ago
@five4sythes w w w youtube.com/watch?v=TeY8kqAgMCo . Would you mind telling us what are these laws that are violated by evolution?
am101171 1 week ago
@am101171 First and second laws of thermodynamics, law of cause & effect, Law of mass action, Law of biogenesis, Anthropic principle, perhaps others.
(Please PM me if you wish to discuss further, way too many threads here and not enough room for full responses)
five4sythes 1 week ago
@five4sythes I would be interested in hear all sides, as long as they base their allegations in logical, observable evidence. I said evidence not facts, because evidence is more realistic, but it you any side can offer verifiable facts that is just great. If every writer of a science book or evolution book is lying please show me incontrovertible proof of this.
am101171 1 week ago
@am101171 The best known lie still in textbooks today is the idea that "Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny" The inventor of this was shown to be a fraud, convicted by his own university and science has since shown this to be wrong as well. Another is the idea that the Colorado River formed the grand canyon over millions of years when the center of it is a mile higher than the ends. Vesitgal organs, homologus structures, etc. All this and much more can be found through Google.
five4sythes 1 week ago
@five4sythes "ontogeny": I don´t see what is the problem as you said it has been proven wrong within science, you only need to look in wikipedia and it says that it was disproved. Grand Canyon: is this about evolution, I have to admit I don´t understand the point on this one. What about Vestigial organs and homologous structures. I have to be honest I am skeptical of your point of view. Anyways thanks for the subjects I did take a look on them.
am101171 6 days ago
@am101171 It was disproved and yet it is still taught in textbooks today. I was taught that when I was in school. Vestigal organs are used in textbooks to try to prove evolution, even though it is the opposite of it. They try to say small bones in the rear of whales used for reproduction used to be their feet when they were on land, etc. For both sides don't just go to Wikipedia, they are heavily evolution biased. Go to CreationWiki for the other side. Use that same skepticism for all views.
five4sythes 6 days ago
@five4sythes " Use that same skepticism for all views." Sure why not :). To be fair " Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny". I will take a look at creationWiki, but I have to say that if it is openly stated (not only in wikipedia) that the theory has been falsified, then there is no more to say about it. Now if it is being taught as schools it needs to be corrected.
am101171 6 days ago
Comment removed
am101171 6 days ago
@am101171 Thanks for the discussion. I wish you the best.
five4sythes 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@five4sythes Some teachers are just not updated enough or missinformed. I can tell you that I was taught in elementary public school that in spanish the letter v has a different sound than the letter b like in french, portuguese and english, though in spahish both letters are the same sound, and this is my mother tongue, So you can imagine how bad education can be, with out even needing great conspiracy theories on the work., luckily I was able to go to a private high school later on.
am101171 6 days ago
@five4sythes h t t p : //mooselab.cropsci.illinois.edu/longterm.html
cooladas 1 week ago
@cooladas Thanks! This proves the idea that there are basic kinds of plants and animals and no matter how much you try to change them they will always remain that same plant or animal. In the artice they purposely select certain types of corn to make more corn and thats all they ever get. Just like we can breed certain kinds of dogs. We will always end up with a dog. The small number of mutations (if any could be beneficial) are alway offset by genetic drift.
five4sythes 1 week ago
@five4sythes i face palmed.I think you severely misinterpreted the experiment. There are six strains of corn from a common ancestor. one strain was selected for high oil. one strain was selected for low oil. one strain was selected for high protein. and one was selected for low protein. halfway through the experiment 2 more strains were created by reversing the selection of a portion of the high protein strain. and reversing the selection of the low protein strain(....)
cooladas 1 week ago
@cooladas if you look at the line graph you will see the protein measurments over time. you will see that the strain selected for high protein gradually rises in protein content and that the strain selected for low protein gradually declines in protein content. the ones selected for oil show evidence of genetic drift because they are not selected based on protein.
cooladas 1 week ago
@cooladas Nice. Thanks for sharing.
five4sythes 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice video , everyone check out my channel and give me a shot (Subscribe) . First video comng soon in my channel so i will appriciate if you check the channel . Thanks
MrFunnyPhysics 3 weeks ago in playlist MinutePhysics
i understood until he started talking about entropy
thisaccisformusic 3 weeks ago
Does it go in a knee?
DonutSlayer99 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from minutephysics
what...
mrblue251 3 weeks ago
People are going to say that God created the low entropy state but this is a terrible argument. So are we going to say that God is of low entropy? He must be, because he created a low entropy universe. Now, who created God? God couldn't become low entropy by himself. This is called logic people. And don't start throwing that "God has always been there and there is no need for him to be made". You're just disproving your older point.
Hinduspy 3 weeks ago
@Hinduspy Creationists really piss me off when they ruin good science videos like this, please don't bring up the issue.
anticorncob6 2 weeks ago
It started orderly because of God. I believe that much. But when you say sin made it disorderly then i think youre crazy.
VKSmovies 4 weeks ago
Time is a useful concept.
mattgresh1 4 weeks ago in playlist MinutePhysics
The reason it was in perfect order was because God created it that way. It has become disorderly because of sin. Understand the "Arrow of Time" now.
cat101king 4 weeks ago
@cat101king Even if God did create the universe "in perfect order" (which in this context means an endless expanse of perfectly homogenous gas composed of evenly spaced hydrogen atoms), entropy could not be caused by human action, firstly because human biology could not operate without entropy and secondly because it is a necessary component of any non-contradictory set of physical laws. There are more ways for something to be disorderly than orderly. It's mathematical truth.
TheDrCN 4 weeks ago
You have to know a bit about thermodynamics to fully understand this video
flowiepanda 1 month ago
Hey! Some people remember the future! Ever heard of a prophet?
iugey 1 month ago
@iugey Not sure if trolling or just really stupid
drexter170 1 month ago
@iugey
they had what is called a vision
MrOmargan 3 weeks ago
Q:why was so low entropy
Me:why not!
memac3321 1 month ago 20
how did you get him?
TheFrizzo12 1 month ago
cool
TheFrizzo12 1 month ago
This dude sounds like Alan Alda.
theblueisyou 1 month ago
in real world present does not exists, it's always the past
powerofpaper 1 month ago
Its orderly cause god mad it that way. DONE
ben19vault 1 month ago
@ben19vault To be honest, creationism is the most stupid way to explain existence
Th1s1sMyAcc0untNam3 1 month ago in playlist MinutePhysics
Matter don`t have to get more chaotic in time. dirt and water becomes leaf on a tree. and the 2th. law of thermothingy mostly only works inn closed systems. in space every direction seems the same because you have nothing to point at, the same goes for time. you need to compare it with something. and where it is matter you can. and last: you can find time in physics, for example: you can know where an electron is right now or where it is likely to be in the future.
ANTIMONcom 1 month ago
@ANTIMONcom True, matter does not HAVE to undergo entropy. Entropy is a force, but it can be counteracted by using energy to perform work. An example: A cell is a highly ordered unit of molecules. It is a small pinprick of order in an increasingly chaotic universe. By expending energy to do work (in this case, a proton pump powered by phosphorylation using ATP) the cell can create order. The pump moves protons across its concentration gradient. The cell has to work to make order.
HereIAmJugggernaut 1 month ago
The by forcing the protons up their concentration gradient, the cell lowers the entropy around it, but it is natural for said protons to fall down the gradient (this is called diffusion). The proton can fall back across the mitochondrial membrane and turn a turbine protein (ATP synthase) to turn ADP into ATP. This means that although the cell restores order temporarily, it is natural for entropy to occur. Biology and physics are fun!
HereIAmJugggernaut 1 month ago
@HereIAmJugggernaut then what about natural things that happens because of the way molecules interact? example: oil in water. it does not mix cause water is polar and oil is not, this maces the oil separate from water and (usually) float. it does not cost energi. ones the oil is in the water they will remain separated.
ANTIMONcom 2 weeks ago
The AT&T ad at the start: yes, give them your money and get nothing in return. Don't you guys realize that that company is a total scam?
powergirl901 1 month ago
i loved this till i toke an ARROW OF TIME TO THE KNEE!!!!
lpg21998 1 month ago
briefly: everything ends by time
Armedmanx 1 month ago
Also, the concept of time is simply a representation of the elapsing laws of physics-- in other words, the laws of physics define what we call "time." like, what makes a clock tick? What causes a "day?" what holds together and operates the biological clock inside of us? It's all organized and determined by strict and perfectly measured laws of physics that define our universe! :O
Natinwave 1 month ago
Inevitable entropy and continuous expansion of the universe point to an organized, definite beginning of existence; to me it only makes sense that what caused the natural world to exist had to have been supernatural. If the big bang was an entirely physical/natural reaction, entropy SHOULD have ensued. But it didn't! Food for thought.
Natinwave 1 month ago
past and present are fleeting gripping me
nothing sections wasted infected and breeding
vacant collapsible pieces of time
stored and left unread
du4316 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodyearBandit I bet ur a stupid and naive fundamentalist :D
MarcDaKind 1 month ago
Comment removed
MarcDaKind 1 month ago
The whole order/disorder thing confuses me because orderliness seems like too subjective a concept to be a fundamental property of anything.
basser 1 month ago
There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.
There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
-Douglas Adams
maupow91 1 month ago
Or time is only a perception of past experiences and potential experienced to come and we are all only here in the present moment choosing what next potential experience we would like to possibly manifest whether consciously or subconsciously in each moment.
Kjjoker1 1 month ago in playlist MinutePhysics
either the original guy went through puberty, or this is just a different guy.
exaggeratedsarcasm 1 month ago
1:19 Cosmologists?
ROTSTarge 1 month ago
im just proud to see not a single knee related comment on a video with the word "arrow" in the title.
CultofColor 1 month ago
@CultofColor Don't give any ideas...
baabaaer 1 month ago in playlist More videos from minutephysics
Why? God. Simple answer...
tspamtyahoocom 1 month ago
What?
HardStyleDesign 1 month ago
YESS!!
MY FIRST VIDEO TO UNDERSTAND FROM THE FIRST TIME
0zero0360 1 month ago 32
This has been flagged as spam show
I liked this guy better, explains things more clearly.
SilentShotV 1 month ago
Toeveryone I was 'arguing' with below (you know who you are). I'm sorry for any confusion and anger I may have caused. I didn't have my facts straight and should've before I even made my first comment. I would've been able to explain better if I was a 30 year old creation scientist with a PhD. But I'm not. I'm a 14 year old in high-school. Once again, sorry for the problems I caused and I will be praying for everyone that commented on my post and I will no longer be commenting on this page.
Bobsignathus 1 month ago
But entropy only happens when nothing moves in or out of the concealed spot that this entropy is occuring. So it would not apply to our bodies. :)
sethboy66 1 month ago in playlist More videos from minutephysics