Added: 1 year ago
From: math314
Views: 7,826
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lol, this is not a proof, it's a corollary. It follows immediatley from the proof that n!=n(n-1)(n-2)...2.1

  • Prove

    Horse + Ramen Noodles :D

  • r u a math teacher if not u should be one!!!!

  • @PurpleLilac10 no, I just finished high school and going to start college on August 30, 2010 :)

  • 11 people get this, 4 people don't hence

    11=maths smart

    4=not maths smart

    me=not maths smart

    i'll still give you the thumbs up since you went to so much effort

  • u should prove 2+2=5

  • @NcStorm123 I could try lol

  • @math314 ok try

  • love maths

  • That's sooooo wrong, math314 I propose this answer: n! = n*(n-1)! 1! = 1*(1-1)! 1! = 0! 0! = 1! You did not keep the factorial sign from the previous working in the 1=0! line of your solution! QED!
  • @Oluremi7 thats because 1! = 1

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more