Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 4 core at 3.2 GHz vs 6 core at 4.0 GHz . DDR2 800 MHz vs DDR3 1333 MHz !! LOOOL

  • obviously 1333mhz faster than 800mhz herp derp

  • @kanuh nope

  • q6600 yet celebrated well, lag on 5-10% practically next to nothing

  • for 150$ 1090T running at 4GHZ stable you just can't beat the price vs performance

  • @nawzy202 I got a Q9450 instead for $80;p Hurray LGA775! haha

  • AMD FOR LIFE

  • @Baraquiel62 you heard the man, AMD FOR LIFE!!!!!

  • what happened to the song???????

  • yo dude what is the paino music used in this?

  • @Foristality Ludovico Einaudi - Andare

  • it looks like th Q6600 is bottlenecking the gpu from looking at the weather changes fps staying the same

  • Wow, that song is just perfect for this video. Thanks for this. Really liked it.

  • what? intel 1090T faster than I7? wrong, even slower than some I5's. Although it performs very well in heavy tasked applications, like photo and video editing, due to the number of cores. In games, is very poor, for now, but we don't know if it will perform better in the future multi-core applications.

  • @Quadpro24 yeah, most of the games even dont use all six cores. Thats why i7 and i5 from the 2xx0 series are much better to games, but when were talking about cinebench 1090T goes pretty well, even 30% faster than i5 and perorming like a 2600k i7.

  • that game probly does not use all the core which is why the old one is faster

  • @woe96 Well the new one is clearly faster just look at the end or pause in some moments. 1090t wins clearly and average fps is now everything. min and max fps count too and both of them are relay important. Look at q6600 max fps are almost everywhere the same on 1090t they are higher and differentiated. Which means no bottleneck. Max fps means more performance in moments not demanding on GPU alot and min means more performance on hi demanding moments. And well this game uses 1 core of the cpu

  • @woe96 But i don't know why it is flickering. Well i've ran it again later and everything was ok so i gues some program has interrupted a bit.

  • what song is that

  • @Jdwill1014 Ludovico Einaudi - Andare

  • to bad that u dont have any game wich use more than 2 cores (stalker dont use 4 or 6 cores) . I got 4x Q6600 3,2Ghz as my renderfarm in 3dstudio max, and x6 1090T @ 4,1Ghz as mainframe and believe or not that Phenom is faster than 2x Q6600 in network. Try to check that 2 sets in game wich use more than 2 cores (Stalker dont use even 4 cores)

  • What is the name of the song?

  • Not true amd x6 1090t is equal to i5 2500. To say that a four year old q6600 is the same as the x6 is bullshit

  • @dreamurdream well x6 is not equal to i5 but i7 (not the six core one it is differet performance and price point) it is faster than i7 4 core and slower than i7 six core. Well yea saying that Q6600 is farter is definitley a bullshit :D

  • @ZastrzykHD farter lolz

  • @dreamurdream yeah and the radeon card is going to run better on an amd cpu anyway

  • I really like the music if it means anything ;p

  • Here's a plan, either use ddr 3 memory for both of the processors to make it a fair test, or overclock/underclock memory TO ACTUALLY SEE COMPARABLE RESULTS. In my experience ram speed makes all the difference, but this test here makes me question my motherboard and ram more than my loved q6600.

  • @Shadow666790 "Ram Speed Makes all the difference" Good Joke never laughed more! Regardless of the DDR3 memory (witch in 775 cpus doesn't give much performance increase) the Q6600 IS OLD and WILL BOTTLENECK any newer hardware (Like 5870, GTX 480 , 580 ect) Its because of the old architecture, and some other issues about the architecture but it is to long to explain WHY Q6600 IS BOTTLENECKING NEW HARDWARE! This cpu is good now for GPU like GTX 460 anything higher will kill it. Just as Here

  • @Shadow666790 well and again it is just a comparison of my gaming rigs performance............

  • I wish AMD would hurry the fuck up with their bulldozer already ive been waiting for a worthy upgrade

  • amd cpu & nvidia gpu,is the best combination for your bucks

  • @bubamiri Yea i agree it is a good combination but only in Single GPU config If you want to do hi-end multi gpu config (I will buy another 5870 soon) AMD is much better option because it is cheaper and the performance 4 the price is very good On Intel with SLI you are restricted to few boards and most of them are expensive. AMD Crossfire can be done on both AMD/Intell motherboards and crossfire ready motherboards are starting at a very good prices. So 4 now i prefer AMD cpu ang GPU (:

  • @ZastrzykHD I'll give you absolutely right.In my view it is better for me to buy an AMD CPU in combination with a single nvidiacard. greetz

  • @bubamiri But you never know I've had Intel cpus, nvidia gpus and i liked them very much (you can see it in my other videos) I never said goodbye to any of this companies so maybe somewhere in future I'll buy nv gpu and intel cpu again but I don't know just 4 todays days as i said I prefer AMD gpu's and cpus because price to performance is awesome!

  • intel and nvidia are betters

  • anyways music is great :)

  • The Q6600 on 4GHz and he runs the AMD over.

  • what?? I don't understand?

  • @ZastrzykHD powiedział, że gdyby q6600 wykręciłbyś na 4GHz to by rozwaliło phenoma.

  • @ZastrzykHD I am not a fanboy of any Company you can see it in my other videos. I had nVidia cards, Radeon cards, as well as AMD and Intel cpus i know a lot about computers. So stop this stupid comments i am tired of it.

  • @dyysMith sorry it is not possible. How 4 cores on 4 ghz can beat 6 cores? Yes sandy bridge does but it is brand new architecture newer than any current cpu. Q6600 is few years older than Phenom X6 it is just not possible. Q6600 has a lot of architecture bottlenecks but it is too long for this comment to explain. Phenon X6 does not have that kind of problem. If someone tells Q6600 on 4ghz is faster than Phenom X6 on 4GHz he is probably a Intell fanboy. Sorry but this is bullshit.

  • @dyysMith runs over my ass! my own Q6600 couldn't reach the level of 1090T! both were 3.2GHz SAME clock speeds! and yet the Q6600 bottlenecked! I've owned both cpus!

  • cos sie dziwnie przycina i opóźnia na amd ;/

  • @kuchar92 yy AMD skończyło pierwsze?? Więc jak mogło się coś opóźniać? Po 2 STALKER Wykorzystuje tylko 1 rdzeń to co widzisz na AMD to tzw mikro przycięcia zwykle coś takiego występują w konfiguracjach z wieloma grafikami ze względu na specyficzny sposób renderingu grafiki. Tu jednak procesor z powodu wykorzystania tylko 1 rdzenia (dodam że na 100% silnik xRay jest stary jak wuj) nie nadąża z przydzielaniem zadań dla grafiki jest to wada Silnika nie sprzetu. Dodam jeszcze że w samej grze jest ok

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more