So you understand duality, congratulations. Consciousness, the force that drives all of existence to exist, is non-dualistic because there is only one source of consciousness, and that source is within all. Every thing is fundamentally one. Once consciousness observes itself, only then can consciousness perceive duality. Yes there are "negative" dimensions, but only when you view them to be separate from the Self. Negative is only one side of the same coin.
This is just a comment about these interesting video, im sociologist and at the momment when you say that the infinite point of choises can be represented as a point out of the system, i think that you want to say that the infinite causes can be in deed represented as something "solid" like the infinite, so my comment is: have you ever wonder if that representation of what the infinite possible be is also a problem in the lenguaje? a problem of what the word infinite really wants to mean?
So he chose to stop at ten dimensions so that people would no longer ask "But where did that come from?" What bullshit. It's like the God excuse. Q:"Where did that come from?" A:"God" Q: "But where did God come from?" A:"God was always there." Q:"But how?" A:"Stop asking questions or you're going to hell." It's no different than religion.
I have a few questions for you good sir. You said before you are not a physicist so are theses theories based off of your own speculation or the work of others? And this is a bit more far fetched but my friend has been reading alot into the accounts of people vanishing from this dimension unexpectedly. Do you think that is at all possible?
It would make little sense to us since our brains can't take infinity to fit. Just think of Galileo's circle, and Georg Cantor going insane trying to understand it. So yes, there's more than 10 dimensions, but we can only stop at what our brains can hold. Just before I saw your video, I couldn't imagine more than 4, even if I had used the concept of time travel or warping to a parallel universe in my mind, it didn't recognize as another dimension, until I saw your video. So let's leave it at 10.
If we stop and look at an atom, we can assure, just like there's an infinity through 0 and 1, that there is infinity in that atom, in several ways. Why then, can't there be an infinity of infinities making up a line in the eleventh dimension, which then can continue the cycle towards an infinity of dimensions?
course the aant on the edge of the page - he'd put the page left or right else if the ant wanted to be awkward and sit in the middle.
i thought roundabout dim 7 he coulda turned the point to a cylinder sticking out and spin it round so it don't poke us in the eye or summint. be betteer than the crappy line again.
That is weird that if we existed out of a tiny point, how many variations of it would there be at the point of the beginning. Wouldn't there be infinite in dimensions at the very beginning to give it many posibilities of existince, with the mind and body. But yet there's only one true one that we know of, so it's real to say the least.
Topologically-speaking, looking at each stage like the pages of a book, it's easier to make the leap from one page to any other page if intervening pages are bent for compaction. Seems like one always has to assume being at one of the right spots on the edge of page to make the leap elegantly, or a form of prescience in anticipating/controlling folds, with excess bending.
@10thdim might i go further, by relating kabhala with merkaba construction, and then again with iterations as the fibonacci, the mandelbrot and julia set, and mandalas, and what about the marko rodin fingerprint of god, is reality only a construction of the one, all the same yet all different similar to the one, how can this be surfed ! only by inner knowledge?
my thinking is... the one becomes by times.
the none becomes, then is one, multiplies becomes 2, synthesize becomes 3, an so on
Perhaps 10 dimensions is the highest number of dimensions we can immagine as 3rd-dimensional creatures. Think of a flatlander - they may only be able to immagine 7 dimmensions, because they can't fathom gravity or the speed of light being different in other universes, because they don't know what gravity/light IS. Maybe in other dimmensions there are different factors - perhaps there are properties of universal unity that can be changed, making 13 dimmensions.
If there are more than 10-dimensions as it has been defined in "Imagining the Tenth Dimension," then the Universe is irrational. Anything is possible after 10-dimensions including the X-Men, Starship Troopers, Doctor Who, Star Trek, Bizarro World of Superman: because there is no rational reality, everything exists in all possible imagined conditions, it is only a question of getting there as we are here and Bizarro World is there--take a Pan-Dimensional taxi, costs Universe money.
It's like the chicken and the egg paradox. Infinity really is that. Infinite. Two people could sit there and argue about it for an infinite time and they'd still get nowhere. But what about what's outside of that infinity. What do you think lays outside the 10th dimension if anything? Ironically i've noticed from your other video that if the 10th dimension is a point then it lays within a geometrical plane nothing until another point is made then connected by a line. Thus infinity = 0. Wow.
@MSeigeMalicious No, I don't think it's like the chicken and the egg paradox because of evolution but I agree with the rest of your paragraph.
I think for the chicken or egg, it depends with what type of bird (or physics) you are dealing with. If a species of chicken could fly but got fat and couldn't fly anymore, then the whole species and future generations cannot fly. If the gene of an embryonic chick mutates then a new egg will form. either way both the egg and chick came together :)
this old fag is full of shit posing himself as a scientist ,in fact he's just a failed musician ..selling worthless book on amazon , but no buyers ..now on youtube preying on newbees ..you disgusting scumbag
@fooseye The opening is a mashup of my song Everything Fits Together which Ryan Hill created. Here's a link to the karaoke version watch?v=kqvpDMtnehk
if you listen from the 1:32 point you should recognize some of the elements he used for the mashup.
@mysteriomo Because information patterns that can't be represented as physical universes are within the ninth dimension with my approach to visualizing the dimensions.
if there is an ultimate state... then let's just say it is =1 but we still have, 2, 3,4etc all the way to inifnity... endeless loops. If it works outside the system, then the system works, if not it would not be a sytem. And it states that it applies no matter the proportion of scale... now just a thought... if we keep "going up" in proportion of scale, what if we got to this exact same point again... so then there is only this.. all=nothing
I like to picture it as if imagine a point located at 0.99999etc... this point runs all the way to infinity never getting to 1. But still, there is a point at 1 (x=1). this "paradox" of when or where is infinity going to become 1, or to get to 1? (infinity is infinite :!) we may not understand it or percieve it... but in my opinion, this is the "jump" from one dimension to the next...
If you pick any point on an infinite line, the sum of the left and the right isnt zero, its simply undefined. The sum of the positive site is infinity and the sum of the negative site is negative infinity. But infinity minus infinity isnt zero. Its not like you can treat infinity as if it is an actual number, it is a concept which entails contradiction. Similarly infinity divided by infinity isnt one.
I need help on something Rob, we are basing dimensions on a tower right, but what if there was no universe for us to live in? ur basing the theory that the first dimension allows the next. But if there was no universe (that we live in) this must then mean that the 1st 2nd 3rd and 4th dimention does not exist hoverver because 'other multipul universes' do, the rest of the dimensions must exist to allow for other possibilities so as daft as it sounds wouldnt you start with dimention 5?
Or maby work backwards starting with 11? By the way im just basing this on the fact that before the big bang there was no time. If this is so does this mean then time is only applicable within universes again saying that you cant build upon other dimentions without the 4th dimention?
Are you familiar with the cosmological horizon? Same concept. No matter where you go in the universe, you will find yourself right at the very center of what you can observe.
your argument at 1:40 ish about repetition without an outside reference point is what is exactly what Kant's biggest deal about knowledge was; you're looking to define all these things, but theres no way to have an outside unbiased knowledge of a universe you're fully engaged in; you are forever doomed to an impure understanding of the universe, for to have a pure understanding, you would have to have knowledge removed from any experience in this universe, which is impossible.
infinity plus negative infinity does not equal zero, it is indeterminate, just as the number of dimensions is. I agree that it is cool to speculate about this stuff, but it is important to recognize that it is just speculation and is not based on experiments to prove the idea.
No mathematical operation can effect Omega or -Omega once they are reached because math has lost all power once you have exhausted an Omega amount of operations. Counting is only possible with lesser infinities. Infinity + negative infinity actually does equal 0, but I think you meant Omega, a pointer to the highest amount beyond all numbers.
if you believe something is fact than it is fact because your universe can change based on how you interpret it. does anyone get what i'm trying to say
Some string theorists are saying there are ten to the power of 500 other universes with different basic physical laws from the one we live in. But that's a different question from the number of different parallel universe versions of our own universe as per Everett's Many Worlds Interpretation - that may effectively be infinite.
But we are only to be concerned with our specific creater...and his/her/it's assistants and perhaps there is a Conscious god who is our immediate god..The one we lifeforms are supposed to fuse with in our search for an ascension of enlightenment..
This universe(aka the Computer) surely follows it's set of defined and undefined laws..within it's boundaries... I might get bashed for this...
But think of the creator as an engineer for a much greater Creator...so that lower creater definitely not be the only creator subordinate to a greater creater....
Thus starts a chain of endless hierarchial divinity
when we get to asking where did ths come from and where did thiat come from we eventually get the response that it just is. this is impossible for us to accept and yet it is agreed upon by both the intelligent design and random occurance communities. the difference is that random occurance doesn't hold water in light of scientific exploration
You know, if we get to the 10th dimension and have discovered that there are "strings" and whatnot making up physical AND non-physical matter, wouldn't the 11th dimension be like, the spirit realm or something? ^_^ Or ESP, or whatever.
have you ever thought about the creator of the 10th dimension being the 11th dimension...and then there is an infinitesimal chain of creators all sitting in infinitesimal dimensions....has there ever been any discussion on this ever? i am a skeptic and dont really believe in religion but i cant seem to get my head around the fact that the universe is self-created...and thats why we have to imagine that something or someone created everything around us....any comment would be helpful...
"have you ever thought about the creator of the 10th dimension being the 11th dimension... i cant seem to get my head around the fact that the universe is self-created...and thats why we have to imagine that something or someone created everything around us..."
Where did your creator come from? Is this creator self-created? See... you haven't solved anything; in fact, you've made it worse, because an intelligent creator being is even harder to swallow.
Even every possible timeline times every possible universe is one exact number. It is just so big that it is undefined and cant be calculated. If you state that all has One creator wich in his turn has one creator wich in his turn has one creator... It would not be infinite per se, you just wouldnt know where it ends.
The only infinite there is a circle, without beginning nor end. Therefor according to me (today :P) everything with a beginning has an end.
I believe that there are infinite dimensions, because who's to say that we are not one small point in all of them? Who says that we are the beginning of everything? This is just the self-centered human way of thinking. It's likely infinite dimensions have come before us and infinite dimensions are to follow.
We're only subjected to the possibilities of our reality. Anything could happen at any point in space-time, but it's only a possibility. Since humanity is conditioned to not be comets and hoon through space wherever, we can't do that.
Theoretically; infinity, means everything and anything... Literally EVERYTHING. So anything you thought is actually in a sense a possible reality in a different dimension of universe. I like to think that way anywhoes.
@10thdim: I see many negative comments. I think you are doing a very good job. It help me a lot to understand our world. I believe what you and the sciencists are doing will bring human to the sky. If some bodies would like to stay on Earth and continuely create wars, well it is fine, their choices!
Here's a few of my other videos about that: Does the Multiverse Really Exist? watch?v=9187JKkKxx4 What's Before and After? watch?v=YkGZgxeKSCU The Holographic Universe watch?v=hMLVjFrtq6Q The Big Bang and the Big O watch?v=e0iofBT3Vhs Thanks for writing, Rob
Hi Rob I really enjoy your videos. .I cannot help but wonder "we know what we know" many physicist take it for granted that planck is the smallest measurement in the universe . why cannot be it a length of a string which make up a proton? i do realise there is no standrd length of a string but with time theoritical science seems to come up with new building blocks of universe, maybe a 100 years from now it is not strings any more , its probably something else even finer.
Hi, did you see the cover story of New Scientist magazine two weeks ago? Another set of observations of the most distant parts of the universe are now being shown to have distortions that indicate the granular (planck length) nature of spacetime. This combines nicely with the observations reported earlier this year that I talk about in The Holographic Universe which also show how the planck length is a true limit to our reality:
Another question comes to my mind . .though not directly related to 10th dimensions. do we see more stars in the night sky today compared to what it was a 100000 years ago?and do wee expect our skies to be completely filled with stars and light in say 1 billion years? since there are infinite stars in our universe and once their light reaches earth , do we expect them to be visible from there on?
This is known as Olber's paradox, and as I say in my book, it was first solved by Edgar Alan Poe - the fact that the night sky is mainly black rather than white is proof that the universe is not infinitely old.
But actually, cosmologists predict the opposite: they say the accelerating expansion is going to cause us to be able to be see less and less, so that eventually (trillions of years from now) we wouldn't be able to see anything outside of our solar system, if there were people then.
Wow .. !!!!... probably this is one of the strong argument for the proponents of big bang theory and makes sense.. also can you direct me to some theory on universe before big bang ... why did it start with singularity.. how did universe get to that stage? etc . . also let me know if you are giving some lectures in NC would luv to attend it !!!
I'm really looking forward to Sean Carroll's book when it comes out in a few days, it's called From Eternity to Here and it looks at mainstream physics' ideas about the underlying symmetry and "before" and "after" the duration of our universe. I've talked about Dr. Carroll a few times, for instance here:
watch?v=YkGZgxeKSCU
No speaking tours planned at the moment, but thanks for your interest!
do you think that the universe will expand foreever? or there will come (as some people call it ) "the big cruch"? and thenen when all these matter and energy come to and point it will bang againg as it been doing it foreever, so all the thing happens the sames way over and over, so these culd be the 1,234,444,4444 time we have these conversation. what do you think????
I think the universe will expand until it becomes perfectly flat and achieves absolute zero, at which point it will be the same as it was before the big bang. I talk about this in "What's Before and After?".
id like 2 help u here and explain more,try imagime how old the universe is in lights years ,time after all is relative.now image the size of the univers ha u cant but its light years across in any direction.the expansion has a bit 2 play here but the main reason the sky isnt lit up is because stars dont live forever,and if they did the sky would glow red because the most common star is a red dwarf.i hope i helped and very good question
Hi Neria .. my problem ( with my limited understanding of mathematics and theoretical physics!) .. a lot of the theoretical proofs are on hypothesis testing . . how can we be sure that the hypothesis that was assumed in the first place covers every aspect of the phenomenon that a physicist is tryin to explain .. sure there are some ways for that too .. but again goes back to "we know what we know" !!!
It's also worth keeping in mind that we do not actually know what geometrry our universe (or spacetime if you will) has. It can be flat Euclidean, saddle-shaped hyperbolic, elliptictal/spherical. In all these circumstances the notion of parallel lines, when measured at large distances, changes...
Yes. Even though NASA's WMAP project returned results indicating our universe is flat within a 2% margin of error, my money is still on spacetime being slightly curved. I show that in The Holographic Universe:
Two asymptotically converging lines in Euclidean geometry would meet at "infinity". However, parallel lines in Euclidean geometry are by definition neither converging nor diverging, they remain equidistant at every single point, so therefore they will not intersect each other at any point, inflinity included. I have heard of parallel lines meeting at infinity in projective geometry where that's an explicit feature, but haven't heard of any such model or concept relating to Euclidean geometry.
Yes. Infinity is not a place, and is not part of our 3D space. You have to get "outside" of that space to reach infinity, and there are "many roads to infinity".
true! but think of all the infinite repetitions with infinite possibilities and infinite outcomes being one big cloud glowing bigger and bigger in infinite manner
? but would a break in that line have infinity or disturbance if particles of a certain point invade another point resulting in combined masses or is it just another ray off the growing cloud of infinity?
OK, not counting the semantic issues most had when visualizing the 10 levels of dimension and the infinite number of possibilities in each level (I think that's clearer, though still not clear to some), it is still possibly wrong that there are 10 levels. The tenth dimensional level is a point that contains every set of all possible existences, but then we have to ask are there things that other than existences that "exist"? (again, semantic issues abound)
If everything spawns from something, nothing doesn't exist.
So, how come he says that something like, 5:50 "the zero, the unfolded symmetry state that's outside the system is the pie, and our universe is just a piece of that pie."
Let's if I dig it: So he is stating that our universe is a piece of that pie, so it spawns from a piece of either infinity? Since the pie needs a positive and negative infinity, so spawning from the whole pie would be spawning from nothing--zero, whereas,...
e^1pi + 10th dimension=5*5 and the quantem physics are 87*10th dimension*10th dimension the space of the line width 7th dimension*2= 3rd dimension the oposite of time=dimension e=mc^4
our universe could be round, if we could travel through space really fast it would appear that we are going straight up but we could be going around, just like how it appears we are going straight on earth but we are really going around earth
Man you have 3000 subscribers just like Gorilla199. Maybe they are the same subscribers. The fact that you used the word 'proof' with reference to science says it all.
I just checked out Gorilla199's channel, what does conspiracy theories have to do with someone creating an open discussion concerning the nature of reality?
i think that there are more dimensions than 10 because mathematics would expect it to continue, dimensions cant be considered as actual nouns because they are about movement up down left and right etc. thus allowing dimensions beyond our understanding take place, so 50 dimensions would make you more free than 49 dimensions, more like a queen in chess againts a knight. additionally, we are being stupid to think that only mediums we can observe tell us about our dimensions,
I was wondering something i havent got cleared yet.. How can you make sure that is it the universe/s what englobes every aspect of matter? In other words.. can there be something greater than a universe? that maybe could actually hold some "not visible dimmension" we are not considering? Thanks
My hesitations about the tenth being the last are related to the idea described in the original video as "all the possible conditions" for a Big Bang.
The word "conditions" is just a way to take us back in time "beyond" the point of a Big Bang. So couldn't we keep doing that? "Conditions" (or "Multiverses") that came before other conditions? Wouldn't that make the number of dimensions infinite?
You're right - when we go "before" the big bang or "after" the end of the universe, we are outside of spacetime, back out in the enfolded whole, the symmetry state that our universe or any other universe springs from through the breaking of that symmetry.
But I think saying there are potentially an infinite number of universes that could spring from that symmetry breaking, each with their own unique fine structure constants, doesn't require infinite dimensions.
As I understand it the 7th dimension contains infinite possibilities and timelines within the conditions of our big bang. Try to imagine a universe where the laws of thermodynamics did not apply...
Right, what you're talking about is our universe as opposed to a mutliverse of other universes. Basically in this model seven is a far as you need to go if you don't believe there are parallel universes that have basic physical laws different from the one we live in.
You ask "how do we know there is another universe": we don't have a way to prove that yet. But if we imagine that there are other universes, it gives us a way to explain why our own incredibly unlikely universe even exists.
i think this is just people expanding on things that make them excited and things that are epic and mysterious and strange that entice the mind based on the few representative and math related symbols that spike their curiosity such as infinite zero nothing everything and the ties between them and so on. i dont really worry about this stuff because i know that all time space matter energy information and so on was created by God and none of us will ever fathom it.God is infinite.
Doesn't God make you excited? Is God not epic, mysterious, and strange?
"...symbols that spike their curiosity such as infinite zero..."
"God is infinite"
If you do not speculate on the nature of your God where do you base your faith? I don't "worry" about the nature of reality but I am deeply interested by it... Do not share your apathy, lest you interrupt the rest of our excitement.
so i get it, you tell why I'm wrong by expressing the opposite of what i say most people love then tell me that the most likely response to it is also wrong thinking you've got me pinned but what you didn't realize is yes god is infinite and heck yeah that's exciting. i didn't say that things that excite you are wrong or that the only reason to believe them is because they are exciting. to express anything but total joy at the thought of god his existence and what he did on the cross is sad.
In this way of visualizing the dimensions, the tenth we finish with and the zero we start from are intimately tied together. Thinking about the enfolded symmetry of all possible states, they ultimately all add up to a zero which is full, not empty.
But I don't think we can say that 0 is a dimension - it's only a point of indeterminate size, not a spatial dimension, when considered by itself.
Our reality is not a state of creation from nothing, but also, a state of deduction from the whole.
One of the infinite possibilities is the existence of us. We are one possibility in the infinite, and this particular possibility reduces the infinite to finite experience. We were created by addition of possibilities to co-create by reduction of possibilities. = 0
The thing is though we're trying to make finite something that is intrinsically INfinite. Even comprehension of it is impossible because it lies outside, surrounding, comprehension. I look at it this way - there is what is, and there is what isn't. What is, once wasn't, and all that is, is surrounded by all that isn't. But all that is will never surround all that isn't because there is an infinite amount of possibilities for what isn't, and what isn't hasn't even happened/existed yet! Ya.
A lot of the video links that are annotated in the video look interesting, but when I view a video, I prefer to watch it in its entirety before viewing related videos. It would be really cool if you could post those links additionally in the video description so that I could go back and check them out after the video is over.
Excellent information, by the way. I have subscribed!
The problem with the theory of 10 dimensions is that it dosen't include the consciousness. So imagine how it would be if we could visualize all this dimensions, and travel throw them with our consciousness, well Rod here have create it in youtube,so in some way its very legal to say we also can travel and imagine how it would look like. So the 11 dimensions is the consciousness and 12 is that consciousness or "something" that can imagine different consciousness, that means for some "god".
Actually, consciousness is very much a part of this way of visualizing the ten dimensions. Here's some others you might find interesting: I Know You, You Know Me watch?v=lfq5kKkA6pw Crossed Wires in the Brain watch?v=VGbIgllpUUA David Jay Brown and Psychedelics watch?v=kHXLfDaZH24 God 2.0 watch?v=V-Y4xseftg Thanks for writing! Rob
You can picture our universal as small and "some". Or you can Picture our universe as infinity and "all".
Depending on how you see it will determine your relationship to these laws, theorys and dimensions. Ironically if you close your mind, in this case it will open further.
Hello, could it be possible that we exist, and do not exist simultaneously? since if we were to stand next to a scale of infinity, we would have no measure? and conversely, if we were to stand next to an infinitely small scale, we would be infinitely large. so could our size be finite, infinitely large, and infinitely small, (or nonexistant) simultaneously?
I think you accidently put someone else's glasses on....your wife's maybe?
peggygenoway 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
ChuckSchuldinerRIP0 5 months ago
@ChuckSchuldinerRIP0
So you understand duality, congratulations. Consciousness, the force that drives all of existence to exist, is non-dualistic because there is only one source of consciousness, and that source is within all. Every thing is fundamentally one. Once consciousness observes itself, only then can consciousness perceive duality. Yes there are "negative" dimensions, but only when you view them to be separate from the Self. Negative is only one side of the same coin.
darkfire588 2 months ago
This is just a comment about these interesting video, im sociologist and at the momment when you say that the infinite point of choises can be represented as a point out of the system, i think that you want to say that the infinite causes can be in deed represented as something "solid" like the infinite, so my comment is: have you ever wonder if that representation of what the infinite possible be is also a problem in the lenguaje? a problem of what the word infinite really wants to mean?
Satanbaphomet 6 months ago
What would place the points on the infinate Space-Time? If nothing is everything and everything adds up to zero, what would make the zero/nothing?
djf2564 7 months ago
GAHHHH! FLOATING HEAD!
rubikskidcube 7 months ago
3:48
"thats what im talkin aboot"
CANADIAN DETECTED
dannydavis94 8 months ago
Man... this floating head of yours gives me the creeps...!
lufermartins 8 months ago
So he chose to stop at ten dimensions so that people would no longer ask "But where did that come from?" What bullshit. It's like the God excuse. Q:"Where did that come from?" A:"God" Q: "But where did God come from?" A:"God was always there." Q:"But how?" A:"Stop asking questions or you're going to hell." It's no different than religion.
aquaphone 9 months ago
I have a few questions for you good sir. You said before you are not a physicist so are theses theories based off of your own speculation or the work of others? And this is a bit more far fetched but my friend has been reading alot into the accounts of people vanishing from this dimension unexpectedly. Do you think that is at all possible?
AlexanderBlueAvenue 11 months ago
the heads is scary when high!
caliente915 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Rob has no body.
jallelind 1 year ago
It would make little sense to us since our brains can't take infinity to fit. Just think of Galileo's circle, and Georg Cantor going insane trying to understand it. So yes, there's more than 10 dimensions, but we can only stop at what our brains can hold. Just before I saw your video, I couldn't imagine more than 4, even if I had used the concept of time travel or warping to a parallel universe in my mind, it didn't recognize as another dimension, until I saw your video. So let's leave it at 10.
Icekler 1 year ago
If we stop and look at an atom, we can assure, just like there's an infinity through 0 and 1, that there is infinity in that atom, in several ways. Why then, can't there be an infinity of infinities making up a line in the eleventh dimension, which then can continue the cycle towards an infinity of dimensions?
Icekler 1 year ago
MA BRAAAAIIINNNZZZ they hurt.
rockableproductions 1 year ago
cabbucco - you pessimist!
course the aant on the edge of the page - he'd put the page left or right else if the ant wanted to be awkward and sit in the middle.
i thought roundabout dim 7 he coulda turned the point to a cylinder sticking out and spin it round so it don't poke us in the eye or summint. be betteer than the crappy line again.
theOGslagster127 1 year ago
why stop at ten?
because secretly you yankies really do love the metric system.
theOGslagster127 1 year ago
I aree coz dimmentios what they describing are only parts of one fractal - Material Infinity.
Yoyo378 1 year ago
so, what if the concept everyone knows as god, is indeed infinity?
DoroThePro 1 year ago
i thoght this was supposed to be physics and math
but i was wrong
luckyD1993 1 year ago
That is weird that if we existed out of a tiny point, how many variations of it would there be at the point of the beginning. Wouldn't there be infinite in dimensions at the very beginning to give it many posibilities of existince, with the mind and body. But yet there's only one true one that we know of, so it's real to say the least.
Kopdogg 1 year ago
Topologically-speaking, looking at each stage like the pages of a book, it's easier to make the leap from one page to any other page if intervening pages are bent for compaction. Seems like one always has to assume being at one of the right spots on the edge of page to make the leap elegantly, or a form of prescience in anticipating/controlling folds, with excess bending.
CACBCCCU 1 year ago
3:51 357 - epic. such a beautiful idea. my heart sunk.
seigneurvoland666 1 year ago
recursion. you (megaverse) are all that is.
seigneurvoland666 1 year ago
your logo of the 10 dims looks like the kabhala logo three of life
phiphers 1 year ago 2
@phiphers Yes, it's an interesting coincidence all right. I talk about this in vlogs like Where Are You?
watch?v=Befk-LZVOg0
and Jake Kotze and Mystical Numbers
watch?v=NWswxIJuMxI
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 1 year ago
@10thdim might i go further, by relating kabhala with merkaba construction, and then again with iterations as the fibonacci, the mandelbrot and julia set, and mandalas, and what about the marko rodin fingerprint of god, is reality only a construction of the one, all the same yet all different similar to the one, how can this be surfed ! only by inner knowledge?
my thinking is... the one becomes by times.
the none becomes, then is one, multiplies becomes 2, synthesize becomes 3, an so on
phiphers 1 year ago
@phiphers Nice!
Google these words: three becomes one. You should find a blog entry of mine by that title that it looks to me like you might enjoy.
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 1 year ago
Every dimension just multiplies the space. It doesn't stop at 10. That's not how it works, I believe.
MagnusRulerHardt 1 year ago
Perhaps 10 dimensions is the highest number of dimensions we can immagine as 3rd-dimensional creatures. Think of a flatlander - they may only be able to immagine 7 dimmensions, because they can't fathom gravity or the speed of light being different in other universes, because they don't know what gravity/light IS. Maybe in other dimmensions there are different factors - perhaps there are properties of universal unity that can be changed, making 13 dimmensions.
TheMuffinChef 1 year ago
If there are more than 10-dimensions as it has been defined in "Imagining the Tenth Dimension," then the Universe is irrational. Anything is possible after 10-dimensions including the X-Men, Starship Troopers, Doctor Who, Star Trek, Bizarro World of Superman: because there is no rational reality, everything exists in all possible imagined conditions, it is only a question of getting there as we are here and Bizarro World is there--take a Pan-Dimensional taxi, costs Universe money.
WOWJBEOWULF 1 year ago
It's like the chicken and the egg paradox. Infinity really is that. Infinite. Two people could sit there and argue about it for an infinite time and they'd still get nowhere. But what about what's outside of that infinity. What do you think lays outside the 10th dimension if anything? Ironically i've noticed from your other video that if the 10th dimension is a point then it lays within a geometrical plane nothing until another point is made then connected by a line. Thus infinity = 0. Wow.
MSeigeMalicious 1 year ago
@MSeigeMalicious No, I don't think it's like the chicken and the egg paradox because of evolution but I agree with the rest of your paragraph.
I think for the chicken or egg, it depends with what type of bird (or physics) you are dealing with. If a species of chicken could fly but got fat and couldn't fly anymore, then the whole species and future generations cannot fly. If the gene of an embryonic chick mutates then a new egg will form. either way both the egg and chick came together :)
Smarties5555 1 year ago
His body is in another dimension.
EMPPT 1 year ago
this old fag is full of shit posing himself as a scientist ,in fact he's just a failed musician ..selling worthless book on amazon , but no buyers ..now on youtube preying on newbees ..you disgusting scumbag
ytertyu 1 year ago
@ytertyu Give your head a shake! Rob's ideas are being supported by scientists from Oxford University and you're ranting like a lunatic.
socratesrock 1 year ago
I really enjoy all of your videos, but I can't stop wondering what the name of the song in the beginning of your videos is.
fooseye 1 year ago
@fooseye The opening is a mashup of my song Everything Fits Together which Ryan Hill created. Here's a link to the karaoke version watch?v=kqvpDMtnehk
if you listen from the 1:32 point you should recognize some of the elements he used for the mashup.
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 1 year ago
Why do you only deal with all possible infinities, universes and realities? What about the impossible ones?
mysteriomo 1 year ago
@mysteriomo Because information patterns that can't be represented as physical universes are within the ninth dimension with my approach to visualizing the dimensions.
Rob
10thdim 1 year ago
@10thdim oh.... ok ^^
mysteriomo 1 year ago
it's a fraking flying head oh my god you killed us all!
CloudAYB 1 year ago
Every beginning has the end....but every end has the Beginning...What was before beginning?? it was the end,..Sounds quite f***in? but it is.
nirvvana 1 year ago
if there is an ultimate state... then let's just say it is =1 but we still have, 2, 3,4etc all the way to inifnity... endeless loops. If it works outside the system, then the system works, if not it would not be a sytem. And it states that it applies no matter the proportion of scale... now just a thought... if we keep "going up" in proportion of scale, what if we got to this exact same point again... so then there is only this.. all=nothing
abodus 1 year ago
I like to picture it as if imagine a point located at 0.99999etc... this point runs all the way to infinity never getting to 1. But still, there is a point at 1 (x=1). this "paradox" of when or where is infinity going to become 1, or to get to 1? (infinity is infinite :!) we may not understand it or percieve it... but in my opinion, this is the "jump" from one dimension to the next...
abodus 1 year ago
Comment removed
O0oSorousho0O 1 year ago
If you pick any point on an infinite line, the sum of the left and the right isnt zero, its simply undefined. The sum of the positive site is infinity and the sum of the negative site is negative infinity. But infinity minus infinity isnt zero. Its not like you can treat infinity as if it is an actual number, it is a concept which entails contradiction. Similarly infinity divided by infinity isnt one.
stampenhc 1 year ago
what if there was an infinate dimensions in the room more than just length, height and depth
sry for my english
brazni 1 year ago
Wow, this is amazing. Thanks Rob xx
nebbit1 1 year ago
I need help on something Rob, we are basing dimensions on a tower right, but what if there was no universe for us to live in? ur basing the theory that the first dimension allows the next. But if there was no universe (that we live in) this must then mean that the 1st 2nd 3rd and 4th dimention does not exist hoverver because 'other multipul universes' do, the rest of the dimensions must exist to allow for other possibilities so as daft as it sounds wouldnt you start with dimention 5?
roboboyd 1 year ago
Or maby work backwards starting with 11? By the way im just basing this on the fact that before the big bang there was no time. If this is so does this mean then time is only applicable within universes again saying that you cant build upon other dimentions without the 4th dimention?
Sorry to be a pain
roboboyd 1 year ago
But..... if you were on an infinit line, then whereever you put the point then it would be in the middle, eather that or there is no middle
NicolieFrixon 2 years ago 2
Are you familiar with the cosmological horizon? Same concept. No matter where you go in the universe, you will find yourself right at the very center of what you can observe.
watch?v=ZKh2y93hwa4
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
your argument at 1:40 ish about repetition without an outside reference point is what is exactly what Kant's biggest deal about knowledge was; you're looking to define all these things, but theres no way to have an outside unbiased knowledge of a universe you're fully engaged in; you are forever doomed to an impure understanding of the universe, for to have a pure understanding, you would have to have knowledge removed from any experience in this universe, which is impossible.
t3hb0ss 2 years ago
Opening song goes: pussy,pussy,pussy,pussy,tits,tits,tits,titsss....
kimeradon 2 years ago 29
ROFL!!!!
JigzyDa1st 2 years ago
@kimeradon No it's ussy,pussy,pussy,pussy,tits,tits,tits,titss Aaaaaaaaah!
O0oSorousho0O 1 year ago
@kimeradon how the hell did you notice that? LOL!
ry7ky 1 year ago
@kimeradon you are missing the grunting uuuuuhhaaaa
TheDiscoMole 1 year ago
infinity plus negative infinity does not equal zero, it is indeterminate, just as the number of dimensions is. I agree that it is cool to speculate about this stuff, but it is important to recognize that it is just speculation and is not based on experiments to prove the idea.
jeremydavidr 2 years ago
No mathematical operation can effect Omega or -Omega once they are reached because math has lost all power once you have exhausted an Omega amount of operations. Counting is only possible with lesser infinities. Infinity + negative infinity actually does equal 0, but I think you meant Omega, a pointer to the highest amount beyond all numbers.
PoweredButchZ 2 years ago
I certainly know that there are 32 dimension.
magigg 2 years ago
wat if God was insane lol. or took a vacation from his "job"
GirlsLie7 2 years ago
... 42.
dsaerno 2 years ago
Haha, awesome!
Pr0metheusMusic 2 years ago
if you believe something is fact than it is fact because your universe can change based on how you interpret it. does anyone get what i'm trying to say
dickeykevin 2 years ago
i think i get it but how many universe are there?
Doogmeister 2 years ago
Some string theorists are saying there are ten to the power of 500 other universes with different basic physical laws from the one we live in. But that's a different question from the number of different parallel universe versions of our own universe as per Everett's Many Worlds Interpretation - that may effectively be infinite.
So how does (10^500)*infinity sound?
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
That sounds pretty good maybe I can count them all some day :)
Doogmeister 1 year ago
But we are only to be concerned with our specific creater...and his/her/it's assistants and perhaps there is a Conscious god who is our immediate god..The one we lifeforms are supposed to fuse with in our search for an ascension of enlightenment..
platano214 2 years ago
This universe(aka the Computer) surely follows it's set of defined and undefined laws..within it's boundaries... I might get bashed for this...
But think of the creator as an engineer for a much greater Creator...so that lower creater definitely not be the only creator subordinate to a greater creater....
Thus starts a chain of endless hierarchial divinity
platano214 2 years ago
when we get to asking where did ths come from and where did thiat come from we eventually get the response that it just is. this is impossible for us to accept and yet it is agreed upon by both the intelligent design and random occurance communities. the difference is that random occurance doesn't hold water in light of scientific exploration
61cookiemonster 2 years ago 7
outside of all demensions and all possibilities for reality is one inalterable reality outside of the system. our feeble 3D minds call it God.
61cookiemonster 2 years ago 3
You know, if we get to the 10th dimension and have discovered that there are "strings" and whatnot making up physical AND non-physical matter, wouldn't the 11th dimension be like, the spirit realm or something? ^_^ Or ESP, or whatever.
MouseX1000 2 years ago
While watching all these Ten Dimension videos, I decided to look at the time, and it was 10 PM sharp.
arnoldrocksalot 2 years ago
have you ever thought about the creator of the 10th dimension being the 11th dimension...and then there is an infinitesimal chain of creators all sitting in infinitesimal dimensions....has there ever been any discussion on this ever? i am a skeptic and dont really believe in religion but i cant seem to get my head around the fact that the universe is self-created...and thats why we have to imagine that something or someone created everything around us....any comment would be helpful...
atishmittal 2 years ago 2
"have you ever thought about the creator of the 10th dimension being the 11th dimension... i cant seem to get my head around the fact that the universe is self-created...and thats why we have to imagine that something or someone created everything around us..."
Where did your creator come from? Is this creator self-created? See... you haven't solved anything; in fact, you've made it worse, because an intelligent creator being is even harder to swallow.
heirofsalazar 2 years ago 2
Only few things are infinite ;)
Even every possible timeline times every possible universe is one exact number. It is just so big that it is undefined and cant be calculated. If you state that all has One creator wich in his turn has one creator wich in his turn has one creator... It would not be infinite per se, you just wouldnt know where it ends.
The only infinite there is a circle, without beginning nor end. Therefor according to me (today :P) everything with a beginning has an end.
bert0nijs 2 years ago
I believe that there are infinite dimensions, because who's to say that we are not one small point in all of them? Who says that we are the beginning of everything? This is just the self-centered human way of thinking. It's likely infinite dimensions have come before us and infinite dimensions are to follow.
SassySnitch 2 years ago 2
We're only subjected to the possibilities of our reality. Anything could happen at any point in space-time, but it's only a possibility. Since humanity is conditioned to not be comets and hoon through space wherever, we can't do that.
Theoretically; infinity, means everything and anything... Literally EVERYTHING. So anything you thought is actually in a sense a possible reality in a different dimension of universe. I like to think that way anywhoes.
MrSkinless 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@10thdim: I see many negative comments. I think you are doing a very good job. It help me a lot to understand our world. I believe what you and the sciencists are doing will bring human to the sky. If some bodies would like to stay on Earth and continuely create wars, well it is fine, their choices!
neocarton 2 years ago
Comment removed
neocarton 2 years ago
youre right! if we were a contradiction that went on forever we would cancel ourselves out and cease to exist.
lol2skaters 2 years ago
OH SHIT A FLOATING HEAD.
You lost me at hi.
ojuykk 2 years ago 3
since the universe is a small part of the pie, where did that pie come from? Is that pie just a small part of a even bigger pie?
fittlefattle18 2 years ago
10thdim 2 years ago
Thats where (i think) the other dimensions come in to play..
PhillipThunderGrunge 2 years ago
is it only me, or is there a head floating in the air talking to me?
ReinOrgmets 2 years ago
Rabid>>
Here'smy Proof of god
1. God and Science are mutually Exclusive
2. God + Science = Infinity
3. God is a significant portion in the equation above
4. as science begins to explain incomprehensible things of the past, the value of science in the euation increases .
5. but science cannot explain everything in the universe with experimental proof
shdvebeenaphysicist 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
how i hate this fanatics!!! shut up mothafucker!! stupid jerk!! you will be nothing, wasting your time with this fuck religion!! kill your self...
hoomersinpsom 2 years ago
Hi Rob I really enjoy your videos. .I cannot help but wonder "we know what we know" many physicist take it for granted that planck is the smallest measurement in the universe . why cannot be it a length of a string which make up a proton? i do realise there is no standrd length of a string but with time theoritical science seems to come up with new building blocks of universe, maybe a 100 years from now it is not strings any more , its probably something else even finer.
shdvebeenaphysicist 2 years ago
Hi, did you see the cover story of New Scientist magazine two weeks ago? Another set of observations of the most distant parts of the universe are now being shown to have distortions that indicate the granular (planck length) nature of spacetime. This combines nicely with the observations reported earlier this year that I talk about in The Holographic Universe which also show how the planck length is a true limit to our reality:
watch?v=hMLVjFrtq6Q
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
Hi Rob
Another question comes to my mind . .though not directly related to 10th dimensions. do we see more stars in the night sky today compared to what it was a 100000 years ago?and do wee expect our skies to be completely filled with stars and light in say 1 billion years? since there are infinite stars in our universe and once their light reaches earth , do we expect them to be visible from there on?
shdvebeenaphysicist 2 years ago
This is known as Olber's paradox, and as I say in my book, it was first solved by Edgar Alan Poe - the fact that the night sky is mainly black rather than white is proof that the universe is not infinitely old.
But actually, cosmologists predict the opposite: they say the accelerating expansion is going to cause us to be able to be see less and less, so that eventually (trillions of years from now) we wouldn't be able to see anything outside of our solar system, if there were people then.
10thdim 2 years ago
Wow .. !!!!... probably this is one of the strong argument for the proponents of big bang theory and makes sense.. also can you direct me to some theory on universe before big bang ... why did it start with singularity.. how did universe get to that stage? etc . . also let me know if you are giving some lectures in NC would luv to attend it !!!
shdvebeenaphysicist 2 years ago
I'm really looking forward to Sean Carroll's book when it comes out in a few days, it's called From Eternity to Here and it looks at mainstream physics' ideas about the underlying symmetry and "before" and "after" the duration of our universe. I've talked about Dr. Carroll a few times, for instance here:
watch?v=YkGZgxeKSCU
No speaking tours planned at the moment, but thanks for your interest!
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
@10thdim
do you think that the universe will expand foreever? or there will come (as some people call it ) "the big cruch"? and thenen when all these matter and energy come to and point it will bang againg as it been doing it foreever, so all the thing happens the sames way over and over, so these culd be the 1,234,444,4444 time we have these conversation. what do you think????
humbemsishere 2 years ago
I think the universe will expand until it becomes perfectly flat and achieves absolute zero, at which point it will be the same as it was before the big bang. I talk about this in "What's Before and After?".
watch?v=YkGZgxeKSCU
Thanks!
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
id like 2 help u here and explain more,try imagime how old the universe is in lights years ,time after all is relative.now image the size of the univers ha u cant but its light years across in any direction.the expansion has a bit 2 play here but the main reason the sky isnt lit up is because stars dont live forever,and if they did the sky would glow red because the most common star is a red dwarf.i hope i helped and very good question
damienandmusic 2 years ago
Danielghost: why do you want experimental proof? Theoretical proof is more valuable and reliable.
Neria152 2 years ago
Hi Neria .. my problem ( with my limited understanding of mathematics and theoretical physics!) .. a lot of the theoretical proofs are on hypothesis testing . . how can we be sure that the hypothesis that was assumed in the first place covers every aspect of the phenomenon that a physicist is tryin to explain .. sure there are some ways for that too .. but again goes back to "we know what we know" !!!
shdvebeenaphysicist 2 years ago
Rob, as your attourney, I suggest you take a strong bong hit with dimethyltryptamine.
HeffaLaffen 2 years ago
I loved that book. The movie, not so much even though I'm a big Terry Gilliam fan.
10thdim 2 years ago
dmt =)
groundzero0110 2 years ago
but then who created god?
rabidcock 2 years ago
Yes, that's the conundrum I'm talking about here - google the phrase I use here "turtles all the way down" for more.
Or watch
God 2.0
watch?v=V-Y4xseftgQ
God? Or the Multiverse?
watch?v=IJ1fwxqqLQI
What's Before and After?
watch?v=YkGZgxeKSCU
Thanks for writing,
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
god? lol
TheEverandever 2 years ago
It's also worth keeping in mind that we do not actually know what geometrry our universe (or spacetime if you will) has. It can be flat Euclidean, saddle-shaped hyperbolic, elliptictal/spherical. In all these circumstances the notion of parallel lines, when measured at large distances, changes...
eIectrostatic 2 years ago
Yes. Even though NASA's WMAP project returned results indicating our universe is flat within a 2% margin of error, my money is still on spacetime being slightly curved. I show that in The Holographic Universe:
watch?v=hMLVjFrtq6Q
Thanks for the great comments,
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
Two asymptotically converging lines in Euclidean geometry would meet at "infinity". However, parallel lines in Euclidean geometry are by definition neither converging nor diverging, they remain equidistant at every single point, so therefore they will not intersect each other at any point, inflinity included. I have heard of parallel lines meeting at infinity in projective geometry where that's an explicit feature, but haven't heard of any such model or concept relating to Euclidean geometry.
eIectrostatic 2 years ago
Parallel lines meet at infinity? Not in standard Euclidean geometry, they don't...
eIectrostatic 2 years ago
Yes. Infinity is not a place, and is not part of our 3D space. You have to get "outside" of that space to reach infinity, and there are "many roads to infinity".
10thdim 2 years ago
0 - There`s a point
1 - 2 points connected form a line
2 - The line is swept keeping 1 point fixed to form a circle.
3 - The circle is rotated around it`s diameter to form a sphere.
Pause.
4 - There`s the sphere with respect to time. (1)
5 - The sphere w.r.t time from several perspectives. (2)
6 - The sphere w.r.t time from several perspectives, tweaking the multidimensional array of parameters(perspectives).
Actually, i would stop with the 4th dimension as i feel it`s just a repetition.
zapxlib 2 years ago
true! but think of all the infinite repetitions with infinite possibilities and infinite outcomes being one big cloud glowing bigger and bigger in infinite manner
sainmass 2 years ago
? but would a break in that line have infinity or disturbance if particles of a certain point invade another point resulting in combined masses or is it just another ray off the growing cloud of infinity?
sainmass 2 years ago
makes you think about the massive "mass" black holes have maybe a result of such disturbance?
sainmass 2 years ago
great vid!!
hard to believe...that we were once apes swinging on trees..
man you are jimi hendrix...
but of the unoversal realm...
diggin the vids
osheal 2 years ago
Sounds like what the greek philosopher Zeno had to say about monism vs pluralism.
yidaki53 2 years ago
awesome vids dude
scrillarod 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I came to give life and life to the full said JESUS
is not what you are saying and feeling a real sign to you?
see you are NASTY about JESUS
the subject od JESUS :no other subject raises as much anger
there i no peace between those that unbeleive ad GODS people
THIS IS THE TRUTH
why blame GOD for your own rebelion?
and hate GODS people for the same reasons!
Those who love sinning hate JESUS CHRIST the saviour of the world
valu777 2 years ago
silly cow :)
jeffhx 2 years ago 2
jesshx the bible talks about other dimensions
valu777 2 years ago
-If you believe in cause and effect, then you of necessity believe information came from somewhere too.
-In both cases if you want to avoid infinite regression there is no choice but to accept an uncaused cause at some point.
valu777 2 years ago
OK, not counting the semantic issues most had when visualizing the 10 levels of dimension and the infinite number of possibilities in each level (I think that's clearer, though still not clear to some), it is still possibly wrong that there are 10 levels. The tenth dimensional level is a point that contains every set of all possible existences, but then we have to ask are there things that other than existences that "exist"? (again, semantic issues abound)
Truthiness231 2 years ago 2
If everything spawns from something, nothing doesn't exist.
So, how come he says that something like, 5:50 "the zero, the unfolded symmetry state that's outside the system is the pie, and our universe is just a piece of that pie."
Let's if I dig it: So he is stating that our universe is a piece of that pie, so it spawns from a piece of either infinity? Since the pie needs a positive and negative infinity, so spawning from the whole pie would be spawning from nothing--zero, whereas,...
edlimuD 2 years ago
spawning from a piece of the piece would be ok?
edlimuD 2 years ago
Someone say pie?
Crabs4You 2 years ago 2
lol, even I have a hard time figuring out what I was trying to say.
edlimuD 2 years ago
e^1pi + 10th dimension=5*5 and the quantem physics are 87*10th dimension*10th dimension the space of the line width 7th dimension*2= 3rd dimension the oposite of time=dimension e=mc^4
pedofile52 2 years ago
our universe could be round, if we could travel through space really fast it would appear that we are going straight up but we could be going around, just like how it appears we are going straight on earth but we are really going around earth
AsG1989 2 years ago
Question: does this universe after it's end wrap around and start again?
morgantsangari 2 years ago
'what does conspiracy theories have to do with someone creating an open discussion concerning the nature of reality?'
You tell me. That is not what I said.
SupportExtantDodo 2 years ago
dude in your other vid you said there can only be ten what the hell are trying to prove now you say there are an infinite number WTF
sharmoota120 2 years ago
Life too much to bear when you don't have definite answers?
zentonil 2 years ago 2
Man you have 3000 subscribers just like Gorilla199. Maybe they are the same subscribers. The fact that you used the word 'proof' with reference to science says it all.
SupportExtantDodo 2 years ago
I just checked out Gorilla199's channel, what does conspiracy theories have to do with someone creating an open discussion concerning the nature of reality?
zentonil 2 years ago
i think you come from the 10th dimension wold
thanks i learned alot
CariagaXIII 2 years ago
i think that there are more dimensions than 10 because mathematics would expect it to continue, dimensions cant be considered as actual nouns because they are about movement up down left and right etc. thus allowing dimensions beyond our understanding take place, so 50 dimensions would make you more free than 49 dimensions, more like a queen in chess againts a knight. additionally, we are being stupid to think that only mediums we can observe tell us about our dimensions,
sauldavidwilliams 2 years ago
Thats some far out shit to think about.
MISHRAIF 2 years ago 2
Hi Rob,
I was wondering something i havent got cleared yet.. How can you make sure that is it the universe/s what englobes every aspect of matter? In other words.. can there be something greater than a universe? that maybe could actually hold some "not visible dimmension" we are not considering? Thanks
Andres
andrashka3 2 years ago
i think there could be more than 10 dimensions
adrgjdy5t6g46yg 2 years ago
My hesitations about the tenth being the last are related to the idea described in the original video as "all the possible conditions" for a Big Bang.
The word "conditions" is just a way to take us back in time "beyond" the point of a Big Bang. So couldn't we keep doing that? "Conditions" (or "Multiverses") that came before other conditions? Wouldn't that make the number of dimensions infinite?
himini22 2 years ago
You're right - when we go "before" the big bang or "after" the end of the universe, we are outside of spacetime, back out in the enfolded whole, the symmetry state that our universe or any other universe springs from through the breaking of that symmetry.
But I think saying there are potentially an infinite number of universes that could spring from that symmetry breaking, each with their own unique fine structure constants, doesn't require infinite dimensions.
watch?v=CFZVd_Ez23g
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
rob arent there really 7 dimension, because 7 is already an infinite amount of possibilities and timelines
sharmoota120 2 years ago
As I understand it the 7th dimension contains infinite possibilities and timelines within the conditions of our big bang. Try to imagine a universe where the laws of thermodynamics did not apply...
zentonil 2 years ago
well what evidence do you have of another universe how would you know there is another universe
sharmoota120 2 years ago
Right, what you're talking about is our universe as opposed to a mutliverse of other universes. Basically in this model seven is a far as you need to go if you don't believe there are parallel universes that have basic physical laws different from the one we live in.
You ask "how do we know there is another universe": we don't have a way to prove that yet. But if we imagine that there are other universes, it gives us a way to explain why our own incredibly unlikely universe even exists.
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
i think this is just people expanding on things that make them excited and things that are epic and mysterious and strange that entice the mind based on the few representative and math related symbols that spike their curiosity such as infinite zero nothing everything and the ties between them and so on. i dont really worry about this stuff because i know that all time space matter energy information and so on was created by God and none of us will ever fathom it.God is infinite.
masonnf1 2 years ago
Doesn't God make you excited? Is God not epic, mysterious, and strange?
"...symbols that spike their curiosity such as infinite zero..."
"God is infinite"
If you do not speculate on the nature of your God where do you base your faith? I don't "worry" about the nature of reality but I am deeply interested by it... Do not share your apathy, lest you interrupt the rest of our excitement.
zentonil 2 years ago
so i get it, you tell why I'm wrong by expressing the opposite of what i say most people love then tell me that the most likely response to it is also wrong thinking you've got me pinned but what you didn't realize is yes god is infinite and heck yeah that's exciting. i didn't say that things that excite you are wrong or that the only reason to believe them is because they are exciting. to express anything but total joy at the thought of god his existence and what he did on the cross is sad.
masonnf1 2 years ago
did anyone notcie how funny he said "a floooating head" lol
canads..
GHOSTINTHEWOODS 2 years ago
Interesting iformation on dimensions, but what would the 0 dimension be classified as?
Jahan917 2 years ago
it wouldn't be classified as anything because it does not exist. :D
dmjarrington 2 years ago
It would be classified as something I think ... 0 is everything and nothing at the same time, 0 has the capicity to become anything I think
Jahan917 2 years ago
In this way of visualizing the dimensions, the tenth we finish with and the zero we start from are intimately tied together. Thinking about the enfolded symmetry of all possible states, they ultimately all add up to a zero which is full, not empty.
But I don't think we can say that 0 is a dimension - it's only a point of indeterminate size, not a spatial dimension, when considered by itself.
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
ok ... I think I understand ... how do you hold all this information without going insane? I think I'm nearing my limits ...
Jahan917 2 years ago
Insanity is genius.
conspirator272727 2 years ago
In that case I've went insane a long time ago ...
Jahan917 2 years ago
In that case I've gone genius a long time ago...
zentonil 2 years ago
Interesting information on the dimensions though it doesn't speak of the 0 dimension
Jahan917 2 years ago
becoase there isnt one... it woul be just nothing
platon576 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1.hold ur breathe
2.go to another vid
3.add this comment
4.did u make it??
WELL IF U DID UR ROCK AT KISSING
wwooccoo 2 years ago
good exp
imthemafia 2 years ago
Our reality is not a state of creation from nothing, but also, a state of deduction from the whole.
One of the infinite possibilities is the existence of us. We are one possibility in the infinite, and this particular possibility reduces the infinite to finite experience. We were created by addition of possibilities to co-create by reduction of possibilities. = 0
VegetoStevieD 3 years ago
The thing is though we're trying to make finite something that is intrinsically INfinite. Even comprehension of it is impossible because it lies outside, surrounding, comprehension. I look at it this way - there is what is, and there is what isn't. What is, once wasn't, and all that is, is surrounded by all that isn't. But all that is will never surround all that isn't because there is an infinite amount of possibilities for what isn't, and what isn't hasn't even happened/existed yet! Ya.
Itsafire222 3 years ago
I have a request:
A lot of the video links that are annotated in the video look interesting, but when I view a video, I prefer to watch it in its entirety before viewing related videos. It would be really cool if you could post those links additionally in the video description so that I could go back and check them out after the video is over.
Excellent information, by the way. I have subscribed!
787Bisurdaddy 3 years ago
Thanks for your kind words, and good suggestion. I'll try to do that from now on.
Rob
10thdim 3 years ago
The problem with the theory of 10 dimensions is that it dosen't include the consciousness. So imagine how it would be if we could visualize all this dimensions, and travel throw them with our consciousness, well Rod here have create it in youtube,so in some way its very legal to say we also can travel and imagine how it would look like. So the 11 dimensions is the consciousness and 12 is that consciousness or "something" that can imagine different consciousness, that means for some "god".
spand3244 3 years ago
10thdim 3 years ago
You can picture our universal as small and "some". Or you can Picture our universe as infinity and "all".
Depending on how you see it will determine your relationship to these laws, theorys and dimensions. Ironically if you close your mind, in this case it will open further.
calumstevens 3 years ago
ITS...ITS... ITS GOD!
leanonme1 3 years ago
no, zero is God, and god is (a) zero...
obiedopie 3 years ago
lol even zero is something, anyway no need to bring God into it, because i was kidding.
leanonme1 3 years ago
Hello, could it be possible that we exist, and do not exist simultaneously? since if we were to stand next to a scale of infinity, we would have no measure? and conversely, if we were to stand next to an infinitely small scale, we would be infinitely large. so could our size be finite, infinitely large, and infinitely small, (or nonexistant) simultaneously?
9IEIIYIIEIISII 3 years ago
haha you're awesome man
guitarandfood123 3 years ago