They didnt become caucasian until they intermingled with europeans in their conquest of europe. Which is why Atilla was described as Asian even after centuries of arrival.
Huns are basically mongoloid-euroean blended,there are many hun descendants in China with records in their family clan books who went for DNA tests,the most common results are N,O3,C3,Q and R.From my observation some of them still retained a bit of caucasian physical traits like thick eyrbrows,full beards and abundant skin hair.
well im seein alot of ideas as to what The Huns are. What i've lerned is this before the Hun empire under Attila in the 4th century the "Huns" (i say with quotes as not every book i've read not every bit of info i've seen agrees) had an area to live in north of China, after long wars the Huns split into three groups one is said to have stayed in modern Mongolia and may have evolved into the Mongol tribes as we see, another went south and east into the currentmiddle east and the last passed......
@MrDrunkenDane ......through the "Stans" and parts of Russia and onto the banks of the Danube (Hungary). With all of the intermixing it is hard to say weather the Hungarian Huns were an indavidual race, my belife is that by the time the Huns of europe to be had made it to the Danube there is a high chance that they mixed with Magyars, alans, Turks. Also i heard that Hungarian arciologests have found a clay pot dating from about the 1st century in China to be simular to one found in 4th century
@MrDrunkenDane Hungary (further supporting the findings above). but nothing is for certain and im not even im 100% sure that i know all the facts but i know one thing, the Huns are Hungarian with regards to this branch. btw i am a 3rd generation Magyar Canadian and im interested in learning more as i didnt get to hear much.
@Lavard14 We are europeans but we aren't indo-europeans .Our ancestors/Finno-Ugrics and Scythians / were native europeans they were here before the indo-european migrators.
@danjoe741 (I heard that Huns possibly came from Korea, believe it or not.)
Altai region of Central Asia (extends east for about 1,000 miles (1,600 km) from Kazakhstan into western Mongolia and northern China.) Some of the tribes migrated west into Europe due to economic and political pressures (draught, starvation, war and famine) . They were Mongolian and Turkish (their language that is).
Observing the vid, they look to be a colorful bunch. Did you notice the lady riding and shooting? Whew!
@Askar9992 Nobody know where Hun from. Based on some of new archeology study, Hun’s equipments, dress, DNA is just like old ancient Korean that is sinla and that is also shown in German ZDF TV’s documentary. Korean is originally call Han nation from ancient time just like Hun.
However, I think Turkish, Mongolian, and Korean are same people that use same kind language call Ural-Altai
but most historians think that huns originated from Mongolia, East Russia near lake Baikal... Great wall between China & mongolia shows where did huns lived...
Attisss, the things that have separated the people who were originally from the Altay Mountain region over the centuries are these things: geography, ethnic mixing, the 3 major religions of the world and wars with each other. However, in reality our people have similar culture and language. There's one aspect of our culture that the people from the Altay Mountain region still focus on today that I refer - having respect and care for Mother Earth! I would be glad to be friends with you!
Hello Attisss. I felt compelled to provide my opinion about this subject because some other members previously posted some very derogatory and offensive comments about the way some Hungarians look. Quite frankly, I don't think God really cares what we look like. What matters most is what our soul is like. We are all God's children whether we know it or not! I agree with your statement 100%! The people who lived in Central Asia between the Ural and Altay Mountains looked similar in past!
@bh63porsche your absolutely right my friend :D im glad that there are cool ppl like you. We are all Gods children indeed! no matter colour :D hope we can be friends.
I'm a 2nd. generation Hungarian/Magyar American and proud to be so. First of all I want to make it clear that the Hungarian nation from it's beginning has never had a pure race and ethnic group of people. However, the Huns, Avars and Magyars who originally settled and created the Old Hungarian Empire had more in common with each other ethnically, culturally and linguistically. Many Huns, Avars and Magyars were a Mongol Turkish mix with some looking more Mongol looking and some looking Turkish
@bh63porsche hello i just wanna say thank you for telling whats true and not :D but in those days there were no different looks from Turkic or Mongolian, they were the same my friend. Cause they walked around and was called the Huns, today many Turks do look different since they took other ethnic groups for wifes or concubines! so many Turks are mixed, but in those days they just looked the same.
@Attisss turks and mongols were have same look but you know they are not ethnically same.but of course mongols and turks lived many years as neighbours and there were a lot of turks in mongol empire
Jogosan tekintjük magunkat Attila nagy kánunk örököseinek. Őrző táltosaink pontosan tudják a Magyar nép eredetét. Vérségi jogon szereztük hazánkat. Ereinkben pedig folyik még a tiszta ázsiai vérből. Egy napon mindenki megérti majd nemzetünk szerepét a világtörténelemben. Az Őstevő vezesse Attila nemzetét.
@KemTom Ha már feldobtam a labdát, folytatom. Magyarországról lehetne buktatni az egész világrendet. Azok akik "odafent" titkok tudói, pontosan tudják mire gondolok. Attila pedig igenis nagy kán volt. Népeket fogott össze, hogy megbuktassa a rabszolgatartó Rómát. Árpád is népeket fogott össze, így mentette meg a Kárpáthazát a nyugati betörésektől. Sosem volt ez a föld etnikailag egységes. Azon a napon, amikor a titkok kimondatnak újra összeáll majd a szeretet országa.
in addition mongolian is not hun therefore mongolian is not turk but they were smilar nations and cultures before turks prefer islam. there are many sources about this subject you can read them than you will already understand between connection of huns and turks
many people don't know anything here. atilla and huns were turk but many europans don't believe this. turk is a general concept. Namely uzbeks ,Azerbaijanis, cossacks, kirghizs, uigurs are different branches of turk. Huns were ancestor of turks. Hun language can be still understood by turks. many europans think that turks only live in turkey. this is wrong. turks who live in turkey are generaly oguz clan of turks but they say just turk themselves. finally huns are ancestor of turks.
@YLDRM123 However did you come upon "cossacks" being of Turkish origin? Cossacks were and are either Russians or Ukrainians i.e. Slavs. They maybe wore parts of attire resembling those of peoples from Caucasus, and might have even shaved their heads Mongolian-style, but they were purely Indoeuropean.
Yes,cossacks were Slavs but there fighting style was very much influenced by Turkic people (they all were mounted,used sabers instead of straight swords,...) and the first cossacks were seen 14th-15th century
(- the Goldehorde was founded 13th century and the Khanate of Kazan 15th century) after centuries of Turkic-Mongolian raids
DON'T HATE ME BUT IN FACT THEY WERE MONGOLS-MONGOLIANS. THEY WEREN'T TURKISH-MAY THEY WERE TURKISH ESCORTS WHO WERE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THAN TODAY'S TURK WHO BECOME ARABIC.
istvan I was wrong to make magyars christian and all turkish rulers who supported islam-christianity and judaism was wrong.. lets cherish shamanism one more time turanic brothers and sisters..
@oharov you are right... I am from Europe and I don't like the jewish religions.... It is better for us Europeans to be again paganists and for the Turks to be again shamanists...
All nations must respect and admire their cultural and religion roots...
hungarians look at your language you will se alot of similarities between our language(turkish).for example you say "árpa" we say "arpa" ,you say "kapu" we say "kapı" you say ibrik we say ibrik too. you say pabucs we say pabuc.how can it be??your origin is turks(huns) ;]
A friend who is of Hungarian ancestry and I went to see the Genghis Khan exhibit at the museum in Houston. She was amazed at the Mongolian clothing, jewelery, artifacts that looked like things her grandparents brought from Hungary. Even the little felt booties and the rugs. I told her that her people were related and this only proves it. Her son's heroes are Atilla and Genghis. He is 16 , tall and dark haired and practices with swords and bows. He drooled over the Mongol weapons on display.
Even the clothing of the Manchurians with the knotted buttons and high collars are the same as traditional Hungarian clothing that is worn today. There are many cultural similarities that can be found between northern China and Hungary
we the Hungarians know our own history better than anybody els and we know now and always have known the huns are our ancestors before u claim back it up with history because we do know ours which has been a very long on dating back to our migration from asia not the south. the huns came from the east and share origins with the mongols and china and even now they see us as our distant brothers. The huns only arived into the area near the Turkic tribes once they had migrated a long way west.
First, I love this video. Much of it looks choreographed for the festival, but the underlying skills are solid.
Second: The origins of the Hungarians are very complicated. The people seem mostly descended from the Sarmatian (an Iranian branch of Indo-European)and Slavic peoples, but also some Hunnish influx (Turkic).
The language is separate from Turkic, so I support the Finno-Ugric theory, but as the southernmost population, Magyar was strongly influenced Turkic.
HUNgarian..do you know Atila..He is a Turkish emperor in Europa.His state name is Europan Hun State..maybe some stupids donT know Atila but Hungarian people are Turkish mostly.You will see someday that.
All Europe will be us ..all Turks will be unit soon.
i'M not stupid but why are you need to swear? you are stupid then..where Attila come to Europa? there was 2 Hun state.East HUNs and West HUNs..West Huns' leader was Attila..And he was A TURK..get read a little history.
@temirock Dear, I consider the Turk nation a brother-nation, but please, think... The Hun empire, with its 108 nations, existed long before the turks even appeared as a nation. We are talking about 3000-4000 years B.C., and I could go on. Yes, Attila was the king of the Turks too, because they belonged to the same "state", but it's kinda' ignorant to say that he was actually turk. It's like calling an Uighur person Chinese, just because they belong to China atm.
It has never been proven that Attila was a TURK. We don't know exactly where he was from. And I've never seen anything regarding east and west Huns, where did you get that info from? (no offense, I'm just interested in reading it)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
u stupid bro.huns came from asia.and we too.and attila is common hero not only yours.oghuz,kazhak turks,azeri turks,huns,turkmens,kirgiz,özbek turks,volga bulgars....
Huns were turkish-tatarian people for Central Asia. Turk doesn't mean Anatolian turk, but as Poles,Czech,Slovakian,Serbs,Bulgarians,Croatians etc.belong to Slavic lingivistic group...Turks,Kazakhs,Tatars,Hungarians/Magyar,azers,Uzbeks,Uygurs etc,belong to turkish/tatarian lingvistic group.Okay,Hungarians were mixing with white people and today they are white but they preserved their ancient language that belong to this asiatic lingiuistic group as Slavic and Germanic languages belong to indoeuro
hát igen a kicsi lovak nagyon erősek tudnak lenni .Milyen érdekes azok a nagy hadvezérek/harcosok a nehéz cuccokal megrakva és a lovaik elhozták őket a kárpátmedencébe:)
Tök jó, hogy külföldiek vitatkoznak magyarokkal arról, hogy mi is magyarnak lenni. Érdekes a török nézőpont is, pláne, amikor egyikük azt írta: megkérdeztem anyut... Kicsit arra emlékeztet a dolog, amikor szlovákokkal vitatkoztunk történelemről....
Ez a kérdés egyébként sokkal bonyolultabb annál, minthogy mezei emberként egy videófeltöltögetős oldalon állítsunk fel hipotéziseket.
Ritka gyenge bemutató! Szégyen,hogy ilyen csapnivaló tudással kimertek állni emberek elé.Ti az az igazi vásári lovasíjászok vagytok.Bár az a titulust,hogy lovasíjász nem érdemlitek meg
The hungarian language is biulding the binal count system, and the logican thinking. HUNGAR=Sons of the sun. I would offer: madjar tribal above Mongolia.
I offer that if not Proto-Turkic/ Mongolic/etc. then we may be a 4th branch of Altaic group--after all, the Huns were even more ancient than anyone else. The Manchus&Mongols had empires fairly recently in comparison...then Turks, but before that, the Huns.
I think it's also entirely possible Magyars are of the same group as the Huns. Were not 100% sure the origin of the word Magyar or when it even came into being. Perhaps it didnt exist until later. We only know Magyar history from around 7th century earliest when they were in the area of Khazaria. No solid proof exists of anything before then. The Northern Huns who went west out of China may have gone in multiple migrations or split. This is just my thought after reading historical sources.
Either way, more and more people are studying and researching this topic today and more and more people refute the obsolete"finno-ugrian" theory and support the Hun/Magyar idea even in other countries like China and Mongolia. Whatever their origins, it's farther east than the Urals. Perhaps some history was recorded in ancient Rovasiras before it was ordered burned by St. Stephen :(
I'm familiar with linguistics, I study it at school. It's a scientific study, but I was talking about actual Science. My problem is that the linguists always want to classify something that cannot necessarily be classified and want to stick things in groups that they feel are close enough if they can offer some kind of explanation for it. There is not a whole lot backing up this theory except for very little evidence on paper, no physical proof of any sorts
Who said they are from the same period? What the theory is, is that Hungarian evolved from Sumerian, so it obviously wouldn't have existed during that period. That theory does not reflect my exact opinion though. What I can say about it is that people say those are coincedence that words are similar, or that they're not similar enough, the meaning is not exact. Therefore it is "pseudoscience." The same is done for the "Ugrian Theory" but it is called fact. There is a double-standard.
Also Magyars have always numbered much more than the rest of the Ugrian people all together. For there to have been "influence" by the Turks I think would have to mean complete absorption/assimilation on their part. I don't doubt that "Turks" came into contact with Ugrians but I think it's possible that the Magyars were not the Ugrians in this case. If you look at history, first the Scythians then Huns, Avars, Turks, Magyars, Mongols have their empires. Huns are very ancient compared to others.
I haven't researched Sumerian a whole lot actually, since I'm not too much into that theory, however I don't see so many regularities as there are claimed to be with Ugrian. There is a much different grammar structure aside from the whole agglutination, and i have not found more than a couple alleged instances of supposed consonant shifts, and the like. Te Magyar vagy?
Problem is that Hungarian is a unique language in Europe. Its an Asian language. The only others like that in the area are Finnish and Estonian. They have a similar structure and even a few shared words. Therefore people have automatically assumed them to be related and try to create a history around this theory. Hungarian history has always been written by foreigners be it Austrians, Russians or even Slovaks and Romanians. Most objections to nething but Ugrian theory online are by non Magyars
Hungarians are the living HUNS (language, archeology,and history say that). And some people say there is no relation between them, prove it!The international name of magyars is HUNgarians, which carries the name of the nation HUN. There are difference between HUN and Hungarian tombs, check out archeology! And we Hungarians say about ourselfes: We are Huns (only brainwashed ones does not think it).
Not asians anymore. Our ancestors were, however you still cannot say European, as many Hungarians still look very eastern. Try to distinguish them from Turks... you couldn't, and neither could the turks (i speak from experience in Turan)
That is true. There is much archaeological, anthropological, and historical evidence to support that we come from much farther east. Even our language has many more basic words in it like body parts and other things like nature in common with Mongolian and Turkish than it does with Uralic ones. The grammar is also very different. I study Turkish now and always find similarities or shared words. Chinese researchers even believe Xiongnu = Huns = Hungarians. Look up about Tongwancheng in China.
Szia, very nice video showing the performance of the horse archers, good steady technique there i see. Great Hungarian spirit. When i did this my main problem was to shoot arrows backwards and hit the spot from the horse which was to complex for me. And a very nice and classical aikido move takedown of the man :)
By the way... Tekke100! Your knowledge is better then avarage. But not enough close to the truth.
Or we have a missunderstanding in the english language? So the HUNgarian is not the part of the ural family. "The mother is not a part. The mother is the source." The Ural family get from the HUNgarian language. This is very important. But I don't know enough good the english language to explain the exact, important details. So this point i think we got a wreck. Sorry for my bad english.
i will take what else you say , i know all about people cheating with history so im more open minded than most . although the hungaauian as a part of ural altaic ic common i do say it is not proved beyond boubt.
early history, Turkish were under Mongolian rule and iron supplier to the Mongol tribes.
from 7th to 9th century they got powerful and dominating all Turkish and Mongolian tribes. after they lost the battle, they went to western. thats it. dont claim that Huns were turkish, Hungarians are turkish and Mongolians are turkish. Mongolia is not it Turania. we Mongolians dont speak Turkic language and dont look like Turkish.
hungarians are part of the ural altaic language group same as turkic but that is where similarities largely end ,language structure are similar in some ways and bothe were nomads however they are really very different in other ways now. hungarians are not huns but are magyars who are closer to finns . the huns were an early turkic people though
Sorry Tekke100. Your knowledge is wrong about the history. The HUNgarians are very far from finns. Not FINNgarians, HUNgarians. And there are so much real history facts about the truth. The Habsburg clan with the Saint Mother killer catholic church made a huge cheat with scientists and weapon about the HUNgarians(magyar, hun). The Türkish nation say:the hungarians and the türkish are brother nations.They are not too far from the truth.But not the türkish was earlier and bigger.
not what i said . the turkish and hungarian language while sgaring many similarities , and a nomadic origin , the link is distant .not like turkish and azeri ! finnish is also part of the ural altaic family like hungarian and is closer to it than turkish . although this too is distant. if you insist on a relation i would call hungarians cousins , while azeris and turkmen etc are brothers
You have Hungarian cousins, but I'm Hungarian. :) Just try to accept it,I can know it better then other nationalities persons. Your and some hungarian (it's sad) people knowledge come from the Habsburg clan idea, and by they history cheat. Becouse before that everybody knew, believe, and told that, the HUNgarians wouldn't barbarians or nomadic. We have10-12k years old cities with hungarians sings, and names, and acceccories...etc. Hungarians always from this country not from Ural.
Macarım, Türkçe bilirim, ama öbürler de anlasın diye İngilizce yazacağım: the ancesters of Hungarians may be Huns! the Hungarians who have gone to Eastern Turkestan where the Uyghurs live were surprised that the Uyghurs called them Huns. The Uyghurs are saying that the Hungarians were the Huns and they left Eastern Turkestan 2000 years ago. From were do they know this? And why to say that if its not true? Why do they not saying this about the Turks? Other thing: it is proven
2. that the burial customs of the Huns and those of the Hungarians are identic. The archeology has shown that as other nomad nations buried theyr deaths they were putting the whole horse near the body. Only Huns and Hungharians put only the horses head and leg bones near the death. We do not have texts ın hunic language, so we don't know what language the Huns spoked.
yeah... language and "bloodline", two different things...
like the French, they are a Celtic nation, but speak a Latin language... etc
but some peaople here in Hungary like to mix these two... that the Hungarian language is an Uralic language is linguisitaclly proven... but we know much less about our "bloodline"...
It has not been proven. It is based on scant linguistic evidence alone. There is much more similarity with Turk/Mongol language. Ural theory has no historical, archaeological, anthropological, or any other kind of evidence to back it up. It was used as propaganda by Hapsburgs and Soviets to justify their rule of Hungary. Many researchers today disagree, even in China.
Like I said, prove your theory with something with other than pseudoscience yourself. People like you claim that Sumerian words are merely synonyms and don't share the same root, even though Sumerian is a very very very ancient language. When this is done with Ugrian it is called Fact, with Sumerian or anything else it's "Pseudoscience"... there's no historical record that Hungarians were ever Ugrians. Nothing burried in the ground that was discovered. They share no culture whatsoever.
That "Finno Ugrian Theory" has pretty much been disproved and not many people accept it anymore. Origin of this theory is European Nationalism in the 19th cent... a main cause of WW1. also when the whole white supremecy aryan race theory first came about. It has very racist implications and was used to justify foreign rule over Hungary by the Hapsburgs and Soviets. Science would be genetics, carbon dating of artifacts discovered in graves, etc. not a couple words in Finnish that are similar
3.The only place where we can gather certain facts about them are the archeology. This findings show that from todays nations, Huns resembled mostly to the Hungarians.
yes huns are from that area and the huns truly are a turkic race . there may be much hun blood in hungary , but the hangarian language if of the magyars a different related group. the connection is true .
There are some Hungarians who learn Kazakh because they claim to be a relative nation.
Though modern Hungarians are already Europeans but their ancestors came from stepps of Kazakhstan and Russia.
There is still such name Edil (Edil is a Turk name for Volga river).
Modern Turks are really diverced. Turkish and Azeri people look more Mideastern, Uzbeks are descedants of Horezm empire and are close to Persian people.
But these games are very similar to what we have.
hi.. hungarians are huns. turks are huns.. but turks have forgatten their hun side.. ok so hungarians are not turks.. but u must know this turanism was created in hungaria.. before turkey.and the letters are came from middle asia.. it means our roots are same..ok?
It's ancient hungarian runic writing at the begining. It's written from right to left in today's hungarian: "lovasíjász levelezőlista". Which means "archer-rider mailing list" in english.
So it's not turk, but hungarian writing, I know the letters, and the language of course. :)
Greek idiots ! Fatih Sultan Mehmed Fucked the Byzantines in 1453 ! Did you remember it ! Turks conquered all of the asia ! They were the masters of world ! Uigurs were the Turks too idiot. They were the first buddhist Turks.
Hi! I am Kazakh! My Tribe - Argyn(Арғын), I am also a descendant of the Huns. The Hungarians and the Kazakhs - brothers!
llDoterll 5 days ago
They didnt become caucasian until they intermingled with europeans in their conquest of europe. Which is why Atilla was described as Asian even after centuries of arrival.
Lordofthenipplerings 1 month ago
Huns are basically mongoloid-euroean blended,there are many hun descendants in China with records in their family clan books who went for DNA tests,the most common results are N,O3,C3,Q and R.From my observation some of them still retained a bit of caucasian physical traits like thick eyrbrows,full beards and abundant skin hair.
BATURUSHA 3 months ago
well im seein alot of ideas as to what The Huns are. What i've lerned is this before the Hun empire under Attila in the 4th century the "Huns" (i say with quotes as not every book i've read not every bit of info i've seen agrees) had an area to live in north of China, after long wars the Huns split into three groups one is said to have stayed in modern Mongolia and may have evolved into the Mongol tribes as we see, another went south and east into the currentmiddle east and the last passed......
MrDrunkenDane 6 months ago
@MrDrunkenDane ......through the "Stans" and parts of Russia and onto the banks of the Danube (Hungary). With all of the intermixing it is hard to say weather the Hungarian Huns were an indavidual race, my belife is that by the time the Huns of europe to be had made it to the Danube there is a high chance that they mixed with Magyars, alans, Turks. Also i heard that Hungarian arciologests have found a clay pot dating from about the 1st century in China to be simular to one found in 4th century
MrDrunkenDane 6 months ago
@MrDrunkenDane Hungary (further supporting the findings above). but nothing is for certain and im not even im 100% sure that i know all the facts but i know one thing, the Huns are Hungarian with regards to this branch. btw i am a 3rd generation Magyar Canadian and im interested in learning more as i didnt get to hear much.
MrDrunkenDane 6 months ago
descendants of the Huns,the Magyars,you idiot!
gabika82ful 7 months ago
so,.......
why they cal our Land "hun-garia" ????
:)
sure beacuase of hun and warrior.
but I do not care. Evolution went on
bigbosszoz 10 months ago
@bigbosszoz Magyar? Magyars are not huns nor east asians. You are a indo-euroean people.
Lavard14 8 months ago
@Lavard14 We are europeans but we aren't indo-europeans .Our ancestors/Finno-Ugrics and Scythians / were native europeans they were here before the indo-european migrators.
rpgery 7 months ago
/watch?v=iA6FET8dabU from middle anatolia...greeting from Türkiye...
burakkk55 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A hun nyelv a magyar nyelv.
magyarharcos66 1 year ago
A hun nyelv a magyar nyelv.
magyarharcos66 1 year ago
A hun nyelv a magyar nyelv.
magyarharcos66 1 year ago
I heard that Hun possibly from Korea. believe or not.
danjoe741 1 year ago
@danjoe741 (I heard that Huns possibly came from Korea, believe it or not.)
Altai region of Central Asia (extends east for about 1,000 miles (1,600 km) from Kazakhstan into western Mongolia and northern China.) Some of the tribes migrated west into Europe due to economic and political pressures (draught, starvation, war and famine) . They were Mongolian and Turkish (their language that is).
Observing the vid, they look to be a colorful bunch. Did you notice the lady riding and shooting? Whew!
999yullan 11 months ago
@danjoe741 they never lived in Korea.. their roots are from Mongolia, East Russia... they spoke turkic language
Askar9992 6 months ago
@Askar9992 Nobody know where Hun from. Based on some of new archeology study, Hun’s equipments, dress, DNA is just like old ancient Korean that is sinla and that is also shown in German ZDF TV’s documentary. Korean is originally call Han nation from ancient time just like Hun.
However, I think Turkish, Mongolian, and Korean are same people that use same kind language call Ural-Altai
danjoe741 6 months ago
@danjoe741 yes (:
but most historians think that huns originated from Mongolia, East Russia near lake Baikal... Great wall between China & mongolia shows where did huns lived...
Askar9992 6 months ago
oh that's so gay!
weihnachten000 1 year ago
The Turkish power ;)
canimkizimbicik 1 year ago
very nice training
T34pobeditel 1 year ago
Attila is a türkish name! ATTILA means " with hourse".
Türkish "At = Hourse" and "ila = with"
I think, that you can understand ;)
UluTÜRKTimucin
UluTimucin 1 year ago
@UluTimucin Atiila is German name... my name is Attila...i know
polarx4x 1 year ago
@polarx4x many gypsies in Hungary give spanish names to their children(Armando.Alehandro etc.)doesn't make them spanish though
csaba246 1 year ago
Attisss, the things that have separated the people who were originally from the Altay Mountain region over the centuries are these things: geography, ethnic mixing, the 3 major religions of the world and wars with each other. However, in reality our people have similar culture and language. There's one aspect of our culture that the people from the Altay Mountain region still focus on today that I refer - having respect and care for Mother Earth! I would be glad to be friends with you!
bh63porsche 1 year ago
Hello Attisss. I felt compelled to provide my opinion about this subject because some other members previously posted some very derogatory and offensive comments about the way some Hungarians look. Quite frankly, I don't think God really cares what we look like. What matters most is what our soul is like. We are all God's children whether we know it or not! I agree with your statement 100%! The people who lived in Central Asia between the Ural and Altay Mountains looked similar in past!
bh63porsche 1 year ago
@bh63porsche your absolutely right my friend :D im glad that there are cool ppl like you. We are all Gods children indeed! no matter colour :D hope we can be friends.
Attisss 1 year ago
I'm a 2nd. generation Hungarian/Magyar American and proud to be so. First of all I want to make it clear that the Hungarian nation from it's beginning has never had a pure race and ethnic group of people. However, the Huns, Avars and Magyars who originally settled and created the Old Hungarian Empire had more in common with each other ethnically, culturally and linguistically. Many Huns, Avars and Magyars were a Mongol Turkish mix with some looking more Mongol looking and some looking Turkish
bh63porsche 1 year ago
@bh63porsche hello i just wanna say thank you for telling whats true and not :D but in those days there were no different looks from Turkic or Mongolian, they were the same my friend. Cause they walked around and was called the Huns, today many Turks do look different since they took other ethnic groups for wifes or concubines! so many Turks are mixed, but in those days they just looked the same.
Attisss 1 year ago
@Attisss turks and mongols were have same look but you know they are not ethnically same.but of course mongols and turks lived many years as neighbours and there were a lot of turks in mongol empire
floodkhan 1 year ago
Jogosan tekintjük magunkat Attila nagy kánunk örököseinek. Őrző táltosaink pontosan tudják a Magyar nép eredetét. Vérségi jogon szereztük hazánkat. Ereinkben pedig folyik még a tiszta ázsiai vérből. Egy napon mindenki megérti majd nemzetünk szerepét a világtörténelemben. Az Őstevő vezesse Attila nemzetét.
karaulkhan 1 year ago
@karaulkhan Beteg vagy. De ezzel nem vagy egyedül, jó sokan hódolnak ennek a divatnak per pillanat. Majd elmúlik...
KemTom 1 year ago
@KemTom Ha már feldobtam a labdát, folytatom. Magyarországról lehetne buktatni az egész világrendet. Azok akik "odafent" titkok tudói, pontosan tudják mire gondolok. Attila pedig igenis nagy kán volt. Népeket fogott össze, hogy megbuktassa a rabszolgatartó Rómát. Árpád is népeket fogott össze, így mentette meg a Kárpáthazát a nyugati betörésektől. Sosem volt ez a föld etnikailag egységes. Azon a napon, amikor a titkok kimondatnak újra összeáll majd a szeretet országa.
karaulkhan 1 year ago
a magyarok nyalas taposok az igazi magyar az csakis szekely lehet:D :))
greathitsful 1 year ago
The huns were the origin of the hungarians!
rockstar08876 1 year ago
in addition mongolian is not hun therefore mongolian is not turk but they were smilar nations and cultures before turks prefer islam. there are many sources about this subject you can read them than you will already understand between connection of huns and turks
YLDRM123 1 year ago
many people don't know anything here. atilla and huns were turk but many europans don't believe this. turk is a general concept. Namely uzbeks ,Azerbaijanis, cossacks, kirghizs, uigurs are different branches of turk. Huns were ancestor of turks. Hun language can be still understood by turks. many europans think that turks only live in turkey. this is wrong. turks who live in turkey are generaly oguz clan of turks but they say just turk themselves. finally huns are ancestor of turks.
YLDRM123 1 year ago
@YLDRM123 However did you come upon "cossacks" being of Turkish origin? Cossacks were and are either Russians or Ukrainians i.e. Slavs. They maybe wore parts of attire resembling those of peoples from Caucasus, and might have even shaved their heads Mongolian-style, but they were purely Indoeuropean.
Panakeje 9 months ago
@Panakeje
Yes,cossacks were Slavs but there fighting style was very much influenced by Turkic people (they all were mounted,used sabers instead of straight swords,...) and the first cossacks were seen 14th-15th century
(- the Goldehorde was founded 13th century and the Khanate of Kazan 15th century) after centuries of Turkic-Mongolian raids
MrFataL96 5 months ago
@Panakeje russian cossacks are different. ı told another people
YLDRM123 4 months ago
Nice Hungarian ( Mongolian ) people !
gogoasacenusie 1 year ago
DON'T HATE ME BUT IN FACT THEY WERE MONGOLS-MONGOLIANS. THEY WEREN'T TURKISH-MAY THEY WERE TURKISH ESCORTS WHO WERE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THAN TODAY'S TURK WHO BECOME ARABIC.
lxlx168 1 year ago
istvan I was wrong to make magyars christian and all turkish rulers who supported islam-christianity and judaism was wrong.. lets cherish shamanism one more time turanic brothers and sisters..
oharov 1 year ago
@oharov you are right... I am from Europe and I don't like the jewish religions.... It is better for us Europeans to be again paganists and for the Turks to be again shamanists...
All nations must respect and admire their cultural and religion roots...
megasayajinsongoku99 1 year ago
@megasayajinsongoku99
i hear you brother. praise be to tengri and zeus..
salute
oharov 1 year ago
@oharov Heil Zeus , Heil Wodan Heil Tengri ....
I think some turcic nations in the East believe to Tengrismus in a unbroken tradition....
salute
megasayajinsongoku99 1 year ago
Turkey is in west europe!!!!!
tixy77 1 year ago
@tixy77 no West Europe is in the turkey....
megasayajinsongoku99 1 year ago
Nagyon szep Klip Baratam.
Long live all my Hunnic Brothers!
Hajra Turan !
Kök Tengri küch bilen,
Kök Böri olsingil Uran ! ! !
5 *
TurkmanPower 1 year ago 4
hungarians look at your language you will se alot of similarities between our language(turkish).for example you say "árpa" we say "arpa" ,you say "kapu" we say "kapı" you say ibrik we say ibrik too. you say pabucs we say pabuc.how can it be??your origin is turks(huns) ;]
takyanos 1 year ago
A friend who is of Hungarian ancestry and I went to see the Genghis Khan exhibit at the museum in Houston. She was amazed at the Mongolian clothing, jewelery, artifacts that looked like things her grandparents brought from Hungary. Even the little felt booties and the rugs. I told her that her people were related and this only proves it. Her son's heroes are Atilla and Genghis. He is 16 , tall and dark haired and practices with swords and bows. He drooled over the Mongol weapons on display.
nomadnametab 2 years ago 5
Even the clothing of the Manchurians with the knotted buttons and high collars are the same as traditional Hungarian clothing that is worn today. There are many cultural similarities that can be found between northern China and Hungary
NemSoha 2 years ago
I love the many clever foreigners!
We now our history better!
recko2234 2 years ago 5
turkic warriors... hun means türk...
zigaskoz 2 years ago
thats true
BOGZASV8MA 2 years ago
LOL
fassenkugel 2 years ago
we the Hungarians know our own history better than anybody els and we know now and always have known the huns are our ancestors before u claim back it up with history because we do know ours which has been a very long on dating back to our migration from asia not the south. the huns came from the east and share origins with the mongols and china and even now they see us as our distant brothers. The huns only arived into the area near the Turkic tribes once they had migrated a long way west.
FuriousNinja7 2 years ago 6
mocskos történelem hamisítók a Hunok hogy lenének törökök? ezek akkor hülyék...
Hujj Hujj Hajrá!
Zacsaba52 2 years ago
nem csak a hunok, meg mi is...
thrgame 2 years ago
My belief:
First, I love this video. Much of it looks choreographed for the festival, but the underlying skills are solid.
Second: The origins of the Hungarians are very complicated. The people seem mostly descended from the Sarmatian (an Iranian branch of Indo-European)and Slavic peoples, but also some Hunnish influx (Turkic).
The language is separate from Turkic, so I support the Finno-Ugric theory, but as the southernmost population, Magyar was strongly influenced Turkic.
Hikikomori013 2 years ago 2
HUN=TURK hungary form türks attila türksih leader
eserfox 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
heyya, i am hungarian, nagyszerű képek, kiváló
laslohun 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Huns our common Ancestors. Greetings from Kazakhstan!!!
semavatkz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sorry, but if a tree has some branches can any of them say :" I am the root" ?
Respect for the turkish as brothers, not as fathers.
szmesz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
we r not your fathers bro.we r common people.we r unit.TURKish,HUNs,azeis,kirgizs,uzbeks,kazhaks,turkmens,oghuzs,afsars,mongols,
aflxenium 2 years ago
HUNgarian..do you know Atila..He is a Turkish emperor in Europa.His state name is Europan Hun State..maybe some stupids donT know Atila but Hungarian people are Turkish mostly.You will see someday that.
All Europe will be us ..all Turks will be unit soon.
temirock 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
are you stupid Attila Turkish???you are no normal
Attila is a Hun Hun=Székely, The Hun Brother of Hungary. ok?? Attila not Turkis Attila Hun, Asian
Zacsaba52 2 years ago
i'M not stupid but why are you need to swear? you are stupid then..where Attila come to Europa? there was 2 Hun state.East HUNs and West HUNs..West Huns' leader was Attila..And he was A TURK..get read a little history.
temirock 2 years ago 26
@temirock Dear, I consider the Turk nation a brother-nation, but please, think... The Hun empire, with its 108 nations, existed long before the turks even appeared as a nation. We are talking about 3000-4000 years B.C., and I could go on. Yes, Attila was the king of the Turks too, because they belonged to the same "state", but it's kinda' ignorant to say that he was actually turk. It's like calling an Uighur person Chinese, just because they belong to China atm.
Elachus 1 year ago
@temirock Your East-West Hun story made me smile. No offense, you might want to extend your education about it beyond youtube.
Hunak1 1 year ago
@Hunak1 thank you for your sugges Hunak :) you can try it if u want!YOU WİLL WİLL BE SAY THAT WE ARE ALLTURKİSH SOON!
temirock 1 year ago
@temirock are you kidding me ??? Attila , a Turk???? Attila was not a Turk... He wa a Hun.... learn history .....
megasayajinsongoku99 1 year ago
@temirock
It has never been proven that Attila was a TURK. We don't know exactly where he was from. And I've never seen anything regarding east and west Huns, where did you get that info from? (no offense, I'm just interested in reading it)
MrBagoly14 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
u stupid bro.huns came from asia.and we too.and attila is common hero not only yours.oghuz,kazhak turks,azeri turks,huns,turkmens,kirgiz,özbek turks,volga bulgars....
aflxenium 2 years ago
Huns were turkish-tatarian people for Central Asia. Turk doesn't mean Anatolian turk, but as Poles,Czech,Slovakian,Serbs,Bulgarians,Croatians etc.belong to Slavic lingivistic group...Turks,Kazakhs,Tatars,Hungarians/Magyar,azers,Uzbeks,Uygurs etc,belong to turkish/tatarian lingvistic group.Okay,Hungarians were mixing with white people and today they are white but they preserved their ancient language that belong to this asiatic lingiuistic group as Slavic and Germanic languages belong to indoeuro
Serbiannation 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I respect!
SpicyHam 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hun = mongol = turk = kazak=central asia = north china = korea = japan ~~~~~ Ural-Altaic languages
hungary is not hun
hungary was steal name of hun
hungary=german+slavic+gypsy+latin mixed
attila and Genghis Khan is pride of Ural-Altaic
ohdaesu15 3 years ago
i think you're from romania. hungarian the gypsi = roma ROMAnia asshole
thrgame 2 years ago 2
@thrgame bocs de elírtad.. Magyarul a gypsi nem romát jelent hanem cigányt, a cigányok monják magukra h Romá-k, ezért is ROMAnia :)
kovtam07 1 year ago
hát igen a kicsi lovak nagyon erősek tudnak lenni .Milyen érdekes azok a nagy hadvezérek/harcosok a nehéz cuccokal megrakva és a lovaik elhozták őket a kárpátmedencébe:)
wadnarancs00 3 years ago
Huns=Turks=Mongols=Magyar=Estons
vsdos 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Ez a történelemtudomány mai állása szerint sem tisztázott még, hagyjuk meg ezt inkább a történészeknek...
kismouse 3 years ago
Ez a történelemtudomány mai állása szerint sem tisztázott még, hagyjuk meg inkább a történészeknek...
kismouse 3 years ago
Tök jó, hogy külföldiek vitatkoznak magyarokkal arról, hogy mi is magyarnak lenni. Érdekes a török nézőpont is, pláne, amikor egyikük azt írta: megkérdeztem anyut... Kicsit arra emlékeztet a dolog, amikor szlovákokkal vitatkoztunk történelemről....
Ez a kérdés egyébként sokkal bonyolultabb annál, minthogy mezei emberként egy videófeltöltögetős oldalon állítsunk fel hipotéziseket.
kismouse 3 years ago
beautifull horses! but the hun horses look like the horse at 0:31, hutzul horse....
doctoroachis 3 years ago
Ritka gyenge bemutató! Szégyen,hogy ilyen csapnivaló tudással kimertek állni emberek elé.Ti az az igazi vásári lovasíjászok vagytok.Bár az a titulust,hogy lovasíjász nem érdemlitek meg
azworte 3 years ago
Kedves azworte!
Ha ilyen nagy a szád, akkor mutasd, te hogyan csinálod. Ha nem tudsz felmutatni különbet, akkor meg húzd meg magad, mert neked lenne tanulnivalód.
Jó videó, gratulálok.
laci00777 3 years ago
Mi benne az ennyire rosz?
dombicicka 3 years ago
The hungarian language is biulding the binal count system, and the logican thinking. HUNGAR=Sons of the sun. I would offer: madjar tribal above Mongolia.
MirrMurr75 3 years ago
I offer that if not Proto-Turkic/ Mongolic/etc. then we may be a 4th branch of Altaic group--after all, the Huns were even more ancient than anyone else. The Manchus&Mongols had empires fairly recently in comparison...then Turks, but before that, the Huns.
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
I think it's also entirely possible Magyars are of the same group as the Huns. Were not 100% sure the origin of the word Magyar or when it even came into being. Perhaps it didnt exist until later. We only know Magyar history from around 7th century earliest when they were in the area of Khazaria. No solid proof exists of anything before then. The Northern Huns who went west out of China may have gone in multiple migrations or split. This is just my thought after reading historical sources.
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
Either way, more and more people are studying and researching this topic today and more and more people refute the obsolete"finno-ugrian" theory and support the Hun/Magyar idea even in other countries like China and Mongolia. Whatever their origins, it's farther east than the Urals. Perhaps some history was recorded in ancient Rovasiras before it was ordered burned by St. Stephen :(
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
Justice For Hungary, and justice For Transylvania, ennyit beszeljunk angolul..:)) Huns=Magyar=Hungarian
Gezucu01 3 years ago 5
a hunok nem hiszem, hogy Magyarok lettek volna, de en is szeretnek ismet magyarorszaghoz tartozni. Lesz meg Erdely Magyarorszage
thrgame 2 years ago 6
A székelység 100% az itt maradt hunok leszármazottjai. A mai magyarokban is kell legyen HUN vér!
Gezucu01 2 years ago 18
....jól beszélsz testvér :-)
dioski 2 years ago
Köszönöm testvér! :)
Gezucu01 2 years ago
Ha a hunok szerinted nem magyarok, akkor a külföldi nevünkben miért szerepel a HUNgary szó?
Egyértelműen, mi vagyunk a Hunok. Van egy csomó testvér népünk/törzsünk, de például a Hunok között is voltak Fehér és Fekete hunok... :)
recko2234 2 years ago 3
Nem, szerintem nem, de testvér nép
thrgame 2 years ago
a faszért vitázunk itt angolul... ;)
sigmundklaus 3 years ago 3
No need for that kind of language
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
oh, sorry, forgo to say, I am only talking about the language !!!
so, Magyars and Huns may be related genetically, historycaly (I don't know) but the Hungarian language is definately Finnugric
sigmundklaus 3 years ago
XD szerintem meg nem :)
HUNXanta 3 years ago
you know..ther is a syncrhone and a diacrhone type of language analysis ... type it in google, read, and learn something
sigmundklaus 3 years ago
I'm familiar with linguistics, I study it at school. It's a scientific study, but I was talking about actual Science. My problem is that the linguists always want to classify something that cannot necessarily be classified and want to stick things in groups that they feel are close enough if they can offer some kind of explanation for it. There is not a whole lot backing up this theory except for very little evidence on paper, no physical proof of any sorts
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
so you have ancient Sumerian and ancient HUngarian texts, from around the same age to match ? :)
sigmundklaus 3 years ago
Who said they are from the same period? What the theory is, is that Hungarian evolved from Sumerian, so it obviously wouldn't have existed during that period. That theory does not reflect my exact opinion though. What I can say about it is that people say those are coincedence that words are similar, or that they're not similar enough, the meaning is not exact. Therefore it is "pseudoscience." The same is done for the "Ugrian Theory" but it is called fact. There is a double-standard.
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
Also Magyars have always numbered much more than the rest of the Ugrian people all together. For there to have been "influence" by the Turks I think would have to mean complete absorption/assimilation on their part. I don't doubt that "Turks" came into contact with Ugrians but I think it's possible that the Magyars were not the Ugrians in this case. If you look at history, first the Scythians then Huns, Avars, Turks, Magyars, Mongols have their empires. Huns are very ancient compared to others.
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
the key word is: regularities !
are there any in the Sumerian theory? Or is it really just similarities ?
sigmundklaus 3 years ago
I haven't researched Sumerian a whole lot actually, since I'm not too much into that theory, however I don't see so many regularities as there are claimed to be with Ugrian. There is a much different grammar structure aside from the whole agglutination, and i have not found more than a couple alleged instances of supposed consonant shifts, and the like. Te Magyar vagy?
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
Problem is that Hungarian is a unique language in Europe. Its an Asian language. The only others like that in the area are Finnish and Estonian. They have a similar structure and even a few shared words. Therefore people have automatically assumed them to be related and try to create a history around this theory. Hungarian history has always been written by foreigners be it Austrians, Russians or even Slovaks and Romanians. Most objections to nething but Ugrian theory online are by non Magyars
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
hunok-magyarok=
nagyaronkahejj 3 years ago
Not worth to argue about that:
Hungarians are the living HUNS (language, archeology,and history say that). And some people say there is no relation between them, prove it!The international name of magyars is HUNgarians, which carries the name of the nation HUN. There are difference between HUN and Hungarian tombs, check out archeology! And we Hungarians say about ourselfes: We are Huns (only brainwashed ones does not think it).
hejaattila 3 years ago
but you are not east-asians,the huns are east-asians.
But i admit you may have some blood of east-asians.
washxh 3 years ago
Not asians anymore. Our ancestors were, however you still cannot say European, as many Hungarians still look very eastern. Try to distinguish them from Turks... you couldn't, and neither could the turks (i speak from experience in Turan)
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
That is true. There is much archaeological, anthropological, and historical evidence to support that we come from much farther east. Even our language has many more basic words in it like body parts and other things like nature in common with Mongolian and Turkish than it does with Uralic ones. The grammar is also very different. I study Turkish now and always find similarities or shared words. Chinese researchers even believe Xiongnu = Huns = Hungarians. Look up about Tongwancheng in China.
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
Turkic's...
bartovskaya 3 years ago
I think theyr all...Were and some are good archers....Huns,Hungarian,Korean,Japanese,Mongols...Great skill...
Sumsar1594 3 years ago 6
very good. 5 *
GokturkSavascisi1919 3 years ago 2
Ügyesek vagytok tényleg! :)
Csak így tovább!
nasahu01 3 years ago
NO NO URAL FAMILY.SUMER FAMILY
utu84 3 years ago
Ügyesek vagytok!
Ticsee 3 years ago
Jó videó! Megpróbáltam már én is összevágni egy klipet Tamásék műsoraiból, de sajnos elég rossz minőségű filmet készít a kamerám.
caroak76 3 years ago
Szia, very nice video showing the performance of the horse archers, good steady technique there i see. Great Hungarian spirit. When i did this my main problem was to shoot arrows backwards and hit the spot from the horse which was to complex for me. And a very nice and classical aikido move takedown of the man :)
akujjo 3 years ago 2
Remek!!! fasza videó!!!
hunwarrior87 3 years ago 2
By the way... Tekke100! Your knowledge is better then avarage. But not enough close to the truth.
Or we have a missunderstanding in the english language? So the HUNgarian is not the part of the ural family. "The mother is not a part. The mother is the source." The Ural family get from the HUNgarian language. This is very important. But I don't know enough good the english language to explain the exact, important details. So this point i think we got a wreck. Sorry for my bad english.
Lehel3d 3 years ago
i will take what else you say , i know all about people cheating with history so im more open minded than most . although the hungaauian as a part of ural altaic ic common i do say it is not proved beyond boubt.
tekke100 3 years ago
Gatnul you fooollish. turks have 39 certain tribes. with certain looks . Huns where the turks. they spoke the old-turks
DonGiovanni008 3 years ago
early history, Turkish were under Mongolian rule and iron supplier to the Mongol tribes.
from 7th to 9th century they got powerful and dominating all Turkish and Mongolian tribes. after they lost the battle, they went to western. thats it. dont claim that Huns were turkish, Hungarians are turkish and Mongolians are turkish. Mongolia is not it Turania. we Mongolians dont speak Turkic language and dont look like Turkish.
gatnuul80 3 years ago
Turkish always claim that Huns are turkish. in the historic pics, they dont look like turkish, but look like mongolians.
Initially Huns were living in the steppe, nowadays mongolia. Turkish were living in the steppe too. which means turkish and Huns origin is Mongolia!
i was reading turkish history and before AD1000 they history is same as mongolian.
gatnuul80 3 years ago
tekke100 where are you from?
Zsed17 3 years ago
hungarians are part of the ural altaic language group same as turkic but that is where similarities largely end ,language structure are similar in some ways and bothe were nomads however they are really very different in other ways now. hungarians are not huns but are magyars who are closer to finns . the huns were an early turkic people though
tekke100 3 years ago
Sorry Tekke100. Your knowledge is wrong about the history. The HUNgarians are very far from finns. Not FINNgarians, HUNgarians. And there are so much real history facts about the truth. The Habsburg clan with the Saint Mother killer catholic church made a huge cheat with scientists and weapon about the HUNgarians(magyar, hun). The Türkish nation say:the hungarians and the türkish are brother nations.They are not too far from the truth.But not the türkish was earlier and bigger.
Lehel3d 3 years ago
not what i said . the turkish and hungarian language while sgaring many similarities , and a nomadic origin , the link is distant .not like turkish and azeri ! finnish is also part of the ural altaic family like hungarian and is closer to it than turkish . although this too is distant. if you insist on a relation i would call hungarians cousins , while azeris and turkmen etc are brothers
tekke100 3 years ago
Dear Tekke100!
You have Hungarian cousins, but I'm Hungarian. :) Just try to accept it,I can know it better then other nationalities persons. Your and some hungarian (it's sad) people knowledge come from the Habsburg clan idea, and by they history cheat. Becouse before that everybody knew, believe, and told that, the HUNgarians wouldn't barbarians or nomadic. We have10-12k years old cities with hungarians sings, and names, and acceccories...etc. Hungarians always from this country not from Ural.
Lehel3d 3 years ago 2
1. selam tekke
Macarım, Türkçe bilirim, ama öbürler de anlasın diye İngilizce yazacağım: the ancesters of Hungarians may be Huns! the Hungarians who have gone to Eastern Turkestan where the Uyghurs live were surprised that the Uyghurs called them Huns. The Uyghurs are saying that the Hungarians were the Huns and they left Eastern Turkestan 2000 years ago. From were do they know this? And why to say that if its not true? Why do they not saying this about the Turks? Other thing: it is proven
ertancubukcu 3 years ago 2
2. that the burial customs of the Huns and those of the Hungarians are identic. The archeology has shown that as other nomad nations buried theyr deaths they were putting the whole horse near the body. Only Huns and Hungharians put only the horses head and leg bones near the death. We do not have texts ın hunic language, so we don't know what language the Huns spoked.
ertancubukcu 3 years ago 2
selam
yeah... language and "bloodline", two different things...
like the French, they are a Celtic nation, but speak a Latin language... etc
but some peaople here in Hungary like to mix these two... that the Hungarian language is an Uralic language is linguisitaclly proven... but we know much less about our "bloodline"...
sigmundklaus 3 years ago
It has not been proven. It is based on scant linguistic evidence alone. There is much more similarity with Turk/Mongol language. Ural theory has no historical, archaeological, anthropological, or any other kind of evidence to back it up. It was used as propaganda by Hapsburgs and Soviets to justify their rule of Hungary. Many researchers today disagree, even in China.
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
same old bullshit öregem! nevermind science! Long live the pseudoscientific semieducated theories!
álmodj királylány!
sigmundklaus 3 years ago
Like I said, prove your theory with something with other than pseudoscience yourself. People like you claim that Sumerian words are merely synonyms and don't share the same root, even though Sumerian is a very very very ancient language. When this is done with Ugrian it is called Fact, with Sumerian or anything else it's "Pseudoscience"... there's no historical record that Hungarians were ever Ugrians. Nothing burried in the ground that was discovered. They share no culture whatsoever.
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
what? linguistics is not a science?
öcsém, csőlátásból jeles!
sigmundklaus 3 years ago
That "Finno Ugrian Theory" has pretty much been disproved and not many people accept it anymore. Origin of this theory is European Nationalism in the 19th cent... a main cause of WW1. also when the whole white supremecy aryan race theory first came about. It has very racist implications and was used to justify foreign rule over Hungary by the Hapsburgs and Soviets. Science would be genetics, carbon dating of artifacts discovered in graves, etc. not a couple words in Finnish that are similar
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
Google the Hunnic language Codex of Isfahan. Interesting read. There is a paper done on it by Alfred Toth.
xiaogoudelaohu 3 years ago
3.The only place where we can gather certain facts about them are the archeology. This findings show that from todays nations, Huns resembled mostly to the Hungarians.
ertancubukcu 3 years ago 2
1 selam:)
yes huns are from that area and the huns truly are a turkic race . there may be much hun blood in hungary , but the hangarian language if of the magyars a different related group. the connection is true .
tekke100 3 years ago
There are some Hungarians who learn Kazakh because they claim to be a relative nation.
Though modern Hungarians are already Europeans but their ancestors came from stepps of Kazakhstan and Russia.
There is still such name Edil (Edil is a Turk name for Volga river).
Modern Turks are really diverced. Turkish and Azeri people look more Mideastern, Uzbeks are descedants of Horezm empire and are close to Persian people.
But these games are very similar to what we have.
Serzhanonekz9 3 years ago
Excellent! Thank you qunarcher!
horsebackarchers 3 years ago
hun = turk
turk=hun
ask mom :D
baracuda3133 3 years ago
/watch?v=UpT6S9TGjpc in the end
slowmotion78 3 years ago
Today other name of Uiguristan is East Turkistan. And their flag is same with Republic of Turkey just blue. Turks are all around of the World :P
Daldayuvakuranmanda 4 years ago
Okay...
But Hungarian people aren't Turkish or whatever else...
Sevena878 4 years ago 4
hi.. hungarians are huns. turks are huns.. but turks have forgatten their hun side.. ok so hungarians are not turks.. but u must know this turanism was created in hungaria.. before turkey.and the letters are came from middle asia.. it means our roots are same..ok?
sihingalkan 3 years ago
Those letters are... That is the old Hungarian writing
Sevena878 4 years ago
no it is Gokturk alphabet
Daldayuvakuranmanda 4 years ago
Ummm...
I see.
But... we had a similar writing in medieval age.
Just search for this:
Hungaroan writing old
Sevena878 4 years ago
yeah it is possible Turks and Magyars are same nation ^^
Daldayuvakuranmanda 4 years ago
are you sure? :-))
campuzanoNA 4 years ago
Haha.
It's ancient hungarian runic writing at the begining. It's written from right to left in today's hungarian: "lovasíjász levelezőlista". Which means "archer-rider mailing list" in english.
So it's not turk, but hungarian writing, I know the letters, and the language of course. :)
armag333 3 years ago
Type 'magyar rovás' or 'rovásírás' in google.
armag333 3 years ago
/watch?v=f9RaBB-lUgU mutlaka izleyin...
SSSS147123 4 years ago
Lots of comments, and none related to the video. It's just great!! Selam butun turklere!!
wasder9 4 years ago
nice fighting skills.
YangMingYi777 4 years ago
Greek idiots ! Fatih Sultan Mehmed Fucked the Byzantines in 1453 ! Did you remember it ! Turks conquered all of the asia ! They were the masters of world ! Uigurs were the Turks too idiot. They were the first buddhist Turks.
MaddogMckiller 4 years ago
Turks Mogols Native Americans TO THE TURAN!
gourids 4 years ago 3
Ridvanco "youve always fak greek and europa" im not sure of it. Why don't you have control of greece or Europe? be more specific
Sapiopostius 4 years ago
Didn't we?
SancharKhan 4 years ago