I forgot, wait for the Aurora, seen that Scramjet Babe burning the air, what a rush hearing and seeing Mach 1, and the cotton balls in the sky, what a sight.......
This Russian Jet has no chance against the F-22 Raptor with AIM 9-X missiles. Any SU class Russian Jets have the the radar cross signature of an Albatross.
The last split second of a Russian pilot against an F-22 would be....
"OH FUCK" (in Russian) or AMF, either way.
I worked the flightline, been there done that....
greydog0417@yahoo.com EX Armament Specialist USAF
Americans and Russians.. Take it easy both of ur fighters are awesome.. In My country we don't even have anything close to third generation:)) No need to fight.. Peace
Raptor and SU-37 are both awesome.... the Raptor just costs a lot more, but for the right reasons. It's extremely stealthy, and it can be outnumbered and still fight bandits off. Watch the Top 10 fighters series. Still, although they are awesome, you don't have enough of them. You spread your air force out. The SU-37 comes from the SU-27 Flanker. You can also get an SU-35 Super Flanker or an even better version, the SU-37 Terminator. It's a lower cost aircraft that's like a raptor minus stealth.
I have to give this one to the Russians it was one of the first 5th gen aircraft to do this well i think. the f-22 is a 6th gen aircraft which can do the same thing but much much more
now that usa have no money and trillions dept i can't wait for them to pull off all theyr bases from around the globe and shove them up theyr ass. you say su-37 is no better then f-22 on some aspects, then wait for russias 5th generation fighter and see how pitty ur raptor will look i front of it.
there is so much more in russia then just oil and gas, wich will not run out in ur lifetime. face it, usa is just a bug bubble, sooner or later it would blow up. pay your depts and keep low profile for a change.
oh really, such as what? Because oil and gas exports make up a large percentage of the GDP of Russia. And being under 20, chances are the oil will run out in my lifetime. The USA's bubble may burst, but then it will re-form. When Russias bubble bursts, its oil and gas barons will flee, leaving nothing but a nation of feudal peasants and incredibly poor people. Not exactly the foundation for a world power.
And your comparison of the F-22 to the 5th gen Russian fighter is like comparing the P-38 to an A-10, though not so exaggerated. Of course it should be better, it will be newer.
Russia successfully conducted last year live firing tests of the S-400 air defense range 400 kilometers (250 miles), twice the range of the U.S. MIM-104 Patriot, and 2.5 times that of the S-300PMU-2.
The system is also have high capability to destroy stealth aircraft, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles, with an effective range of up to 3,500 kilometers (2,200 miles) and a speed of up to 4.8 kilometers (3 miles) per second.
@vaninec lol do you know during US and Iraq war Iraq use 200 S-300 Against US but there is only 10 are able to reach on there target..the fact is Russain weapon system is not reliable..and about this flanker there is nothing special in it..Su-35 Is bigggggggg plane it means it have Biggg radar croos section and can easly be detect by the enemy radar and more over see the profile of Indian Su-30 Mki in red flag when ever IAF pilots try to lunch Missile Flanker show "It's Jumped"Lol
@signupful Uh, no. Fact is, Sukhoi OKB has done a boatload of work trying to reduce the RCS of their airplanes.
"and about this flanker theres nutin speshul in it LOLS !"
Nope. Sukhoi OKB has since 2003 modernized all of the interiors of their aircraft with integrated avionics, AESA radar and such. Have you seen the thrust vectoring on those things, also? Have you seen any U.S. plane perform those manoeuvres? I don't think so.
Think before you bash this wonderful, formidable airplane.
effing awesome!!!! its like drifting for planes! the only thing is in real combat, these types of maneuvers are only effective during dog fights. notice how the plane has to slow down a lot before it turns, making it an easy target for a missile.
Ha, thats so true. I dont understand why people argue that Russia could beat America in the air war even if the su-37 is more manueverable than the f22. My point is, Russia will never produce enough, Russia doesnt have nearly as much money and power as the Soviet Union.
Its like this. In WWII Germany was playing with some incredibly advanced designs, like the first jet fighter and more advanced helicopters and submarines, but they were in such limited numbers, they hardly had an affect on the War. The same thing would happen if America and Russia ever fought, Russia simply doesnt have enough of this more "advanced" aircraft to compete with the US.
why do we try to find comment on a fictional war? as if the airforce and not the nukes would decide it...just admire the su37 for what it is-a magnificent aircraft.
Ehem, F35 is copy od Yak141 and has aerodymanics worse than f16 and it is less manevourable, in ove word it is so bad as fighter that it will be used only as bomb truck, or it will try to exploit its `stealth` but with low probability of sucess.
F22 is a bit better in terms of mnevouers but it has primitive thrust vectoring compared to airplane shown in video 2d(only up and down) compared to 3D(up-down left and right, with capability of different offest of left and right engine)
I agree this plane is a monster and people think american fighters are so much better? Why is the USAF testing and playing around with migs? Would they bother looking at them if they didnt think they could take anything from them and learn?
i hope they make the su-47,that planes class.terminator's pretty cool.strangest varient of the su-27 i've seen is the su-32 strike flanker(it has a toilet and a small cooker behind the 2 pilot seats)
I'm so annoyed with the f-22 hype. People think that it's "Air Jesus". If Russia puts the PAK FA into production, the f-22 might very well be humbled...
The Su-30 was created to be a fighter-bomber, the Su-37 as an air superiority, is slightly larger an a little bit heighter, it´s crew: 1. In the Su-30: 2. The main diference between them is that the Su-37 uses the AL-37FU engine (with thrust vectoring nozzles) and perhaps, the confussion lies on the many variants in the Su-30 series (K, KN, MK) and it´s export variants (MKK to China, MKI to India).
dog fighting air to air combat is no more.smart bombing,air to ground missile platfom,speed out run anti air weaponry u.s.a king of the sky, lord of tactical lethality we'll shoot a missile right thru a open kithen window hitcha in the ass
Oh...yeah!!! the SU 27 will eat any our airplanes alive, and without any sweat! and I am not trying to mention this awesome SU 37! Go read some books, airhead instead of playing your fantasy video games, or play with....yourself, airhead!
First we got more advanced air-air missile that anybody else.
Second (to HouseMorrigan) with this combat maneuver plane can avoid single missile.Dont foget you need to track plane with rdar or laser beam to aim your missile.
Last - stealth is a myth.You comrades tolk about it often but nobody never thinks how it works.Everyone angled reflector become target in air.
There is no such thing like total invisible aircraft.
Cud some of u point out the diff between SU30 & SU37?
& i hate to see you guys fighting over Dominance of US & Russia. Frankly, god forbid, if a war break out, nobody will be left. In any case, both US and Russia are fighting a global enemy, Islamic Terrorism.
Those are impressive maneuvers, but that's not what air combat is about these days. Fighter-based radar systems are never going to be as useful as a good AWACs controlling not only intercepts but also missile guidance. You don't grab your 12 fighters and charge in for a dogfight anymore. You shut off your radar and stealth in. You fire your missiles and then your AWAC guides them in from 200 miles away. Cobra maneuver or whatever is fun for airshows but not the most important militarily.
If you lived 20/30 years ago at USSR time, you can remember, US/England(strong Capitalism countries) had no rest day & night, thinking that Soviets would blow them up enytime.
please the ks-172 is still in development cause the russian don't have enough money to finish it. and the ks-172 or the Mig-31 can't even touch the f-22 cause its invisible to >>>radar<<< fool
u dont know what ur talking about the b2 went over kosovo into serbia took out all their main sam sites when they had the entire sky on their radar .... they were there on their towers smoking fake marlboro reds when they said where are the american planes at and boom they got toasted... and the russian mig 29 were knocked out of the sky so quick that it was no competition at all all of serbias mig 29s got destroyed
Of cause they did, Americans had mega advantage in planning and force combination, when serbians did not even have oka-pilots. Moreover, Americans had a huge advantage in numbers in the sky...
170 NATO planes crossed Serbian border with awacs, and other supporting plans, only 12 old Mig 29 resist to it. One F-117 was destroyed. 170 VS 12!!!! Red stars are cool, they bit some planes in this dishonest fight.
yeah, and now as we got the gas throttle in our hands, all the world critizises us for blackmailing them with gas, while all they do is blackmail with weps..
go russia. keep giving washington your middle finger. if yanks are so much better, why did they elect a pathetic cowardly immoral dumbass piece of shit like bush whereas you russkies elected a black-belt economist lawyer who thinks like great men like kim philby and george blake (nomme de guerre max de vries).
last of my rant. didn't mean to spam, just didn't know the character limit.
Who is also a former KGB agent, who tried to poison the current president of Ukrane, who recently sent a tupalov bear nuclear bomber towards Alaska. Who is also a real prick.
and the russians didn't have the bulging war chest that america built up mainly by sinking its vampire fangs into latin america and de facto enslaving the whole region; the only difference between william walker and the usa government is size.
russians do so much more with less than do the usa. the t-34/76 was the main tank at kursk, and 3500 of them kicked the crap out of 2800 much more expensive (and yet slow, unreliable and short-ranged) nazi tanks. the red army, with its superior fighting ability (and the help of t-34/85 and is-2 tanks), would have driven the yanks and poms back to dunkirk within 6 months.
By the way, I've just found information telling that it is faster than F-22. It wasdesigned to be better than F-22 so don't try to search any advantages over SU-37 in F-22.
I admit, however, that there is one and it is the most important: the American budjet is able to supply army with F-22, and the Russian gouvernment can only boast of few prototypes.
You're wrong. It's much easier to show tricks on a moderate or high speed but nobody did that on a speed close to 0. Don't confuse a show and a real fight.
I agree Anaraziel, a Euro fighter or a JSF/Raptor would see a SU doing it's fancy, although slow like a whale, maneuvers and just shoot it down. Those tricks are pretty to look at but they've no place whatsoever in modern warfare.
Damn, THAT'S, what I call "maneuverability". In one way in a combat this could be great, but all these maneuvers are very slow, I think an eurofighter just would pass by, turn and gun it down.
Did anyone notice how the CGI sequences greatly exaggerated the actual maneuvers? Also some of the maneuvers like the wingover and hammerhead stall have been around since WWII.
GABRIEL is correct. Both the F-22 and this SU-37 have thrust vectoring, however the F-22 only has pitch (up and down) thrust vectoring whereas the SU-37 has both pitch and yaw (side to side) thrust vectoring capabilities.
i'm not sure about that. Those burner cans look like regular old divergent nozzles. like we have on our 15's. The 22 is bad. We can never beat them when we go out to practice. Don't let it fool you. It's badass. F15 pilot. 2 years.
Die Streite, wer besser, wer schlechter ist?
Ich werde nur so sagen" kämpfen sie niemals gegen Russland und dann werden sie zufrieden sein!"
The quarrels, who better who is worse?
I will say only so" they never fight against Russia and then they will be contented!"
Споры ,кто лучьше ,кто хуже ,ни когда не воюйте против россии и останетесь целы.
giperborei200 1 month ago in playlist AVIONES RUSOS
I forgot, wait for the Aurora, seen that Scramjet Babe burning the air, what a rush hearing and seeing Mach 1, and the cotton balls in the sky, what a sight.......
greydog0417@yahoo.com
shadowfax0417 5 months ago
@shadowfax0417 If you're hauling ass at Mach 25, you won't have time to accurately deploy ordnance.
:sunglasses:
radda
raddaguy 4 months ago
This Russian Jet has no chance against the F-22 Raptor with AIM 9-X missiles. Any SU class Russian Jets have the the radar cross signature of an Albatross.
The last split second of a Russian pilot against an F-22 would be....
"OH FUCK" (in Russian) or AMF, either way.
I worked the flightline, been there done that....
greydog0417@yahoo.com EX Armament Specialist USAF
shadowfax0417 5 months ago
Nářez!
dan3377able 1 year ago
much better than F-22, USA jets never can make the same dogfight moves
GeneralWagner 1 year ago
When it comes to thrust vectoring the Russians are certainly ahead of everyone by a large step. Watching those Flankers is pure poetry.
Arkanoid1212 1 year ago
Americans and Russians.. Take it easy both of ur fighters are awesome.. In My country we don't even have anything close to third generation:)) No need to fight.. Peace
misr11 2 years ago 3
Raptor and SU-37 are both awesome.... the Raptor just costs a lot more, but for the right reasons. It's extremely stealthy, and it can be outnumbered and still fight bandits off. Watch the Top 10 fighters series. Still, although they are awesome, you don't have enough of them. You spread your air force out. The SU-37 comes from the SU-27 Flanker. You can also get an SU-35 Super Flanker or an even better version, the SU-37 Terminator. It's a lower cost aircraft that's like a raptor minus stealth.
Hearsesrock427 2 years ago
I have to give this one to the Russians it was one of the first 5th gen aircraft to do this well i think. the f-22 is a 6th gen aircraft which can do the same thing but much much more
Japacanadian 2 years ago
And yet
One shoulder launched missile will destroy
it!
Tsk tsk!
bullcurr 3 years ago
now that usa have no money and trillions dept i can't wait for them to pull off all theyr bases from around the globe and shove them up theyr ass. you say su-37 is no better then f-22 on some aspects, then wait for russias 5th generation fighter and see how pitty ur raptor will look i front of it.
spartak300 3 years ago
Only until the oil runs out, and with it the strength of the russian economy. Once there is no oil left to export, Russia is screwed.
Taffy29 3 years ago
there is so much more in russia then just oil and gas, wich will not run out in ur lifetime. face it, usa is just a bug bubble, sooner or later it would blow up. pay your depts and keep low profile for a change.
spartak300 3 years ago
oh really, such as what? Because oil and gas exports make up a large percentage of the GDP of Russia. And being under 20, chances are the oil will run out in my lifetime. The USA's bubble may burst, but then it will re-form. When Russias bubble bursts, its oil and gas barons will flee, leaving nothing but a nation of feudal peasants and incredibly poor people. Not exactly the foundation for a world power.
Taffy29 3 years ago
You have no idea what you are talking about son
SouthUKGuy 2 years ago
And your comparison of the F-22 to the 5th gen Russian fighter is like comparing the P-38 to an A-10, though not so exaggerated. Of course it should be better, it will be newer.
darkfall13 2 years ago
wow..... ich glaube Physik hasst dass... PRIMA!
panzerschranz 3 years ago 2
Real fighter
galaxymess 3 years ago
Russia successfully conducted last year live firing tests of the S-400 air defense range 400 kilometers (250 miles), twice the range of the U.S. MIM-104 Patriot, and 2.5 times that of the S-300PMU-2.
The system is also have high capability to destroy stealth aircraft, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles, with an effective range of up to 3,500 kilometers (2,200 miles) and a speed of up to 4.8 kilometers (3 miles) per second.
vaninec 4 years ago 6
@vaninec lol do you know during US and Iraq war Iraq use 200 S-300 Against US but there is only 10 are able to reach on there target..the fact is Russain weapon system is not reliable..and about this flanker there is nothing special in it..Su-35 Is bigggggggg plane it means it have Biggg radar croos section and can easly be detect by the enemy radar and more over see the profile of Indian Su-30 Mki in red flag when ever IAF pilots try to lunch Missile Flanker show "It's Jumped"Lol
signupful 1 year ago
@signupful Uh, no. Fact is, Sukhoi OKB has done a boatload of work trying to reduce the RCS of their airplanes.
"and about this flanker theres nutin speshul in it LOLS !"
Nope. Sukhoi OKB has since 2003 modernized all of the interiors of their aircraft with integrated avionics, AESA radar and such. Have you seen the thrust vectoring on those things, also? Have you seen any U.S. plane perform those manoeuvres? I don't think so.
Think before you bash this wonderful, formidable airplane.
radda
raddaguy 4 months ago
effing awesome!!!! its like drifting for planes! the only thing is in real combat, these types of maneuvers are only effective during dog fights. notice how the plane has to slow down a lot before it turns, making it an easy target for a missile.
Orion22deblanc 4 years ago
Yeah. but the idea is that they don't get locked in the first place. They won't do well against long range then.
digitaloverlord 4 years ago
texas, are you sure russians have no money?
Besdies, you do not need money to produce something, but supplies and workforce, which russians have in big numbers...
Read about how many T34 tanks were built by the USSR in WWII and in what time frames...
amebata123 4 years ago
Just type ekranoplan
And you will see what Russia had 1950s
US way behind (some experts say at list 20 years)
vaninec 4 years ago
Cool
meankitty42 4 years ago
menudo golpe para el F22 el su 37 termineitor o super flanker es muy bueno pero el su 47 berkut se baja a cualquier avion yanki
andreorellana 4 years ago
its called su-37 presentation video by zeoul001. iots in english
lordofmutants 4 years ago
they have one thats in english
lordofmutants 4 years ago
And this plane rulz!
ssmaxx 4 years ago
its a great plane for sure but russias like our general motors they put out crazy and brilliant concepts but they never go into production =0
darkskyak1 4 years ago
Ha, thats so true. I dont understand why people argue that Russia could beat America in the air war even if the su-37 is more manueverable than the f22. My point is, Russia will never produce enough, Russia doesnt have nearly as much money and power as the Soviet Union.
texas112678 4 years ago
Its like this. In WWII Germany was playing with some incredibly advanced designs, like the first jet fighter and more advanced helicopters and submarines, but they were in such limited numbers, they hardly had an affect on the War. The same thing would happen if America and Russia ever fought, Russia simply doesnt have enough of this more "advanced" aircraft to compete with the US.
texas112678 4 years ago
why do we try to find comment on a fictional war? as if the airforce and not the nukes would decide it...just admire the su37 for what it is-a magnificent aircraft.
Koenigseggmaniac 3 years ago 2
what is the music playing in the background I've heard in a russian's taxi cab
poppingcherries1 4 years ago
I am from Greece, please give us the PAK-FA when its ready...will you? Turks are Buying the F-35 Lightning II, do you think that Su-37 can beat it?
chabos4 4 years ago
rofL dont worry, we dont need the f35 to beat you^^
Boomerush 4 years ago
US fighter jets can't do these things, and if they can show me a video. Can't wait till they make PAK-FA and MIG 1.44
dtmfreak 4 years ago
This is so impressive! There wouldnt be any aircraft to match theese capabilities for a looooong time.
Consigpal 4 years ago
you can say that again..,, VERY GOOD
ariffhamaru 4 years ago
check my other video about su-47 heh
margav 4 years ago
@Consigpal Ehem...F22....F35...just sayin
1kyleabc 2 months ago
@1kyleabc
Ehem, F35 is copy od Yak141 and has aerodymanics worse than f16 and it is less manevourable, in ove word it is so bad as fighter that it will be used only as bomb truck, or it will try to exploit its `stealth` but with low probability of sucess.
F22 is a bit better in terms of mnevouers but it has primitive thrust vectoring compared to airplane shown in video 2d(only up and down) compared to 3D(up-down left and right, with capability of different offest of left and right engine)
Consigpal 2 months ago
I agree this plane is a monster and people think american fighters are so much better? Why is the USAF testing and playing around with migs? Would they bother looking at them if they didnt think they could take anything from them and learn?
james74duster 4 years ago
i hope they make the su-47,that planes class.terminator's pretty cool.strangest varient of the su-27 i've seen is the su-32 strike flanker(it has a toilet and a small cooker behind the 2 pilot seats)
stevok777 5 years ago
I'm so annoyed with the f-22 hype. People think that it's "Air Jesus". If Russia puts the PAK FA into production, the f-22 might very well be humbled...
WhiteHarpy 5 years ago
i like how the vid is done ..greatly demonstrated .. even if i dont understand one word of russian lol
Xploratio 5 years ago
The Su-30 was created to be a fighter-bomber, the Su-37 as an air superiority, is slightly larger an a little bit heighter, it´s crew: 1. In the Su-30: 2. The main diference between them is that the Su-37 uses the AL-37FU engine (with thrust vectoring nozzles) and perhaps, the confussion lies on the many variants in the Su-30 series (K, KN, MK) and it´s export variants (MKK to China, MKI to India).
hackmind 5 years ago
is su30 better or su37
smarteddie21 5 years ago
Hahahahahahaha "Girl" say right,Good question in nine words show us, hahahahahaha.
Nelsondoremi 5 years ago
dog fighting air to air combat is no more.smart bombing,air to ground missile platfom,speed out run anti air weaponry u.s.a king of the sky, lord of tactical lethality we'll shoot a missile right thru a open kithen window hitcha in the ass
joesaya 5 years ago
lmfao!!! ))))
dude, get a life! )))
HayTxa 5 years ago
sure, i'll let you keep living in your happy little fairy land kid.
KillerHippy5 5 years ago
Oh...yeah!!! the SU 27 will eat any our airplanes alive, and without any sweat! and I am not trying to mention this awesome SU 37! Go read some books, airhead instead of playing your fantasy video games, or play with....yourself, airhead!
mindydang 5 years ago
First we got more advanced air-air missile that anybody else.
Second (to HouseMorrigan) with this combat maneuver plane can avoid single missile.Dont foget you need to track plane with rdar or laser beam to aim your missile.
Last - stealth is a myth.You comrades tolk about it often but nobody never thinks how it works.Everyone angled reflector become target in air.
There is no such thing like total invisible aircraft.
Coalitionhonorguard 5 years ago
hahaha islamic terrorrism ma are you stupid
zakugm 5 years ago
Cud some of u point out the diff between SU30 & SU37?
& i hate to see you guys fighting over Dominance of US & Russia. Frankly, god forbid, if a war break out, nobody will be left. In any case, both US and Russia are fighting a global enemy, Islamic Terrorism.
nandtalk 5 years ago
Those are impressive maneuvers, but that's not what air combat is about these days. Fighter-based radar systems are never going to be as useful as a good AWACs controlling not only intercepts but also missile guidance. You don't grab your 12 fighters and charge in for a dogfight anymore. You shut off your radar and stealth in. You fire your missiles and then your AWAC guides them in from 200 miles away. Cobra maneuver or whatever is fun for airshows but not the most important militarily.
HouseMorrigan 5 years ago
if US planes can do it show me video!!!!
Girlllllllllllllllll 5 years ago
If you lived 20/30 years ago at USSR time, you can remember, US/England(strong Capitalism countries) had no rest day & night, thinking that Soviets would blow them up enytime.
azzaQ 5 years ago
Actually none of you have done your military research...
There are several USAF aircraft that can preform the cobra maneuver and the same tricks that the Su-37 can do ..
F-22 (from horizontal flight)
F-15 ACTIVE
F-16 MATV/VISTA
F/A-18E/F (from horizontal flight)
NASA's X-31
The Eurofighter Typhoon
So yea.... United States aircraft can kick just as hard as the copycat Russian planes
deathlord747 5 years ago
A Su-37 has better BVR-Fight-Abilities than the F-22? Why?
Because it has a Ks-172, a Rocket with a range of 400km, the F-22 would be shoot down before they check whats up in the air.
Even the old MIG-31 would fuck up a F-22, why?
Because it can carry AA-X-13 and Ks-172 and it has the best radar with the biggest range in the world:
The "SBI Zaslon 16" NATO-Code: "Flashdance"
damcon 5 years ago
please the ks-172 is still in development cause the russian don't have enough money to finish it. and the ks-172 or the Mig-31 can't even touch the f-22 cause its invisible to >>>radar<<< fool
comquaq 5 years ago
The SBI Zaslon 16-Radar is in its 3rd Generation... Even the 2nd Gen. could find B2.
Invisible to Radar, did you know that the russians invented the stealth-techniques that the USA uses today?
So the MIG-31 is able to see stealth-planes, thats not new.
damcon 5 years ago
u dont know what ur talking about the b2 went over kosovo into serbia took out all their main sam sites when they had the entire sky on their radar .... they were there on their towers smoking fake marlboro reds when they said where are the american planes at and boom they got toasted... and the russian mig 29 were knocked out of the sky so quick that it was no competition at all all of serbias mig 29s got destroyed
redfirekla 4 years ago
Of cause they did, Americans had mega advantage in planning and force combination, when serbians did not even have oka-pilots. Moreover, Americans had a huge advantage in numbers in the sky...
Duckzilla123 4 years ago
actually only two migs against 30 nato planes with AWACS support....
ssmaxx 4 years ago
170 NATO planes crossed Serbian border with awacs, and other supporting plans, only 12 old Mig 29 resist to it. One F-117 was destroyed. 170 VS 12!!!! Red stars are cool, they bit some planes in this dishonest fight.
MIKERUS11 4 years ago
The Koulchuga-Radar-System (ground-to-air) has a range up to 800km.
It can localisate stealth up to 400km...
If u put KS-172 weaponed Planes+Koulchuga the USA has no chance to break through such a shield.
Or Koulchuga + S-300(MPU1/2)S-400
damcon 5 years ago
I like the SU-37 but my fav is still the F-14 super Tomcat it never lost a fight not 1 and it's speed and payload out do most.
NavyBrat90 5 years ago
Fuckin amazing.
gault8121 5 years ago
Its a good thing that manned aircraft have a bright future ahead of them, and that UAVs are not getting better at all. .... oh wait ...
LOL. MIGHT AS WELL POST A GODDAMN STURMOVICH, THIS SHIT IS OBSOLETE IN 5 YEARS. UAVs UBER ALLES
SpasticWilliams 5 years ago
why people hates the usa air force?¿? F.22 Is a good aircraft
canariaa 5 years ago
USA sucks man thats y
KillerHippy5 5 years ago
u wish we do at least we r not chicken shits, pussys come get some son
joesaya 5 years ago
its come get some not son, learn your own language
KillerHippy5 5 years ago
stay with ur's we wouldn't want u to hurt urself being all perfect.
joesaya 5 years ago
I was in air-cadets for 9 years and have never seen a air-craft that can perfrom that well, with supreme efficency, well done!
Hakabraken 5 years ago
shit iam not even russian,go for the motherland!!!
foxhole3 5 years ago
the eurofigther is shit.
SU-37 IS THE BEST OF THE BEST. yeah !
bufiexperimento 5 years ago
yeah, and now as we got the gas throttle in our hands, all the world critizises us for blackmailing them with gas, while all they do is blackmail with weps..
margav 5 years ago
go russia. keep giving washington your middle finger. if yanks are so much better, why did they elect a pathetic cowardly immoral dumbass piece of shit like bush whereas you russkies elected a black-belt economist lawyer who thinks like great men like kim philby and george blake (nomme de guerre max de vries).
last of my rant. didn't mean to spam, just didn't know the character limit.
viewerjan291978 5 years ago
Who is also a former KGB agent, who tried to poison the current president of Ukrane, who recently sent a tupalov bear nuclear bomber towards Alaska. Who is also a real prick.
Poseidon500 5 years ago
ha-ha-ha
kasperbla 5 years ago
and the russians didn't have the bulging war chest that america built up mainly by sinking its vampire fangs into latin america and de facto enslaving the whole region; the only difference between william walker and the usa government is size.
viewerjan291978 5 years ago
russians do so much more with less than do the usa. the t-34/76 was the main tank at kursk, and 3500 of them kicked the crap out of 2800 much more expensive (and yet slow, unreliable and short-ranged) nazi tanks. the red army, with its superior fighting ability (and the help of t-34/85 and is-2 tanks), would have driven the yanks and poms back to dunkirk within 6 months.
viewerjan291978 5 years ago
i'm a total russophile. i love 2 films about the red army: "Zvezda" (1944) and "9 Rota" (Afghanistan).
zvezda kicks saving private ryan's ass and shames that jude law stalingrad crap enemy at the gates.
viewerjan291978 5 years ago
russian mafia rulez
Kubatko 5 years ago
we have the best weapon of the worlt
!!!!go Russia!!!!
AK107 5 years ago
That pilot is doing a Cobra manuveur, very complex it can only be done in a plane with thrust vectoring, like the Su 37
SnowAlpineBunny 5 years ago
but it can sell , which it did - to arabs
margav 5 years ago
By the way, I've just found information telling that it is faster than F-22. It wasdesigned to be better than F-22 so don't try to search any advantages over SU-37 in F-22.
I admit, however, that there is one and it is the most important: the American budjet is able to supply army with F-22, and the Russian gouvernment can only boast of few prototypes.
Karcsi75 5 years ago
You're wrong. It's much easier to show tricks on a moderate or high speed but nobody did that on a speed close to 0. Don't confuse a show and a real fight.
Karcsi75 5 years ago
these are for dogfights, not first engagements
margav 5 years ago
I agree Anaraziel, a Euro fighter or a JSF/Raptor would see a SU doing it's fancy, although slow like a whale, maneuvers and just shoot it down. Those tricks are pretty to look at but they've no place whatsoever in modern warfare.
toothpik00 5 years ago
how can it turn around so fast? Su would do a cobra and be on the fighters tail
margav 5 years ago
Damn, THAT'S, what I call "maneuverability". In one way in a combat this could be great, but all these maneuvers are very slow, I think an eurofighter just would pass by, turn and gun it down.
Anaraziel 5 years ago
Nothing beats the A10 Warthog.
YouTubin2Me 5 years ago
The Russians have certainly come a long way in fighter maneuverability, but their choice in promotional video music is still stuck in the past. xD
FretWanker 5 years ago
*Note: referring to the first couple of seconds.
Did anyone notice how the CGI sequences greatly exaggerated the actual maneuvers? Also some of the maneuvers like the wingover and hammerhead stall have been around since WWII.
FretWanker 5 years ago
lol:)))
nijjuy 5 years ago
GABRIEL is correct. Both the F-22 and this SU-37 have thrust vectoring, however the F-22 only has pitch (up and down) thrust vectoring whereas the SU-37 has both pitch and yaw (side to side) thrust vectoring capabilities.
plainswolf 5 years ago
i'm not sure about that. Those burner cans look like regular old divergent nozzles. like we have on our 15's. The 22 is bad. We can never beat them when we go out to practice. Don't let it fool you. It's badass. F15 pilot. 2 years.
ghaleon2005 5 years ago
hahaha you wasted 2 years of your life
KillerHippy5 5 years ago
in dog fighting this might be the best but when it comes to overall power and stealt the best jet is the f-22 raptor usa baby!!!
rldabomb 5 years ago
try these maneuvers in a f-22 and you will stall
GABRIEL1030 5 years ago
yup, russians have the best pilot stats, knwn to pull 20 Gs.
000majorwinters000 5 years ago
No, because this manuver are made when the pilot turn on the VTC, it can work in the both way...
feijon 5 years ago
wouldnt some of those maneuvers make them an easy target to gun down?
gmm3780 5 years ago
the russians are working on plasma stealth tech, google it
modst84 5 years ago
maybe SU37 foucs too much on maneuverability, a little more focus on stealth may help.
yemail5555 5 years ago
hehe eurofighter is ace as well
margav 5 years ago
eurofighter typhoon forever!!
greetings from greece.
toumpano 5 years ago
no no no.. much different
margav 5 years ago
i think the su-37 is equal
dut129 5 years ago
its cool yea, but the su-47 and mig 1.44 is better
margav 5 years ago
su-37 rules
whatthehell81 5 years ago
yeap
forthereg 5 years ago
english, french, russian
margav 5 years ago
cona da mae
colhao 5 years ago
cona da avo
colhao 5 years ago
pichota
colhao 5 years ago