Added: 4 years ago
From: gdz4321
Views: 426,457
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3,438)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Chris Mathews is a bleeping idiot, LI had that peckerwood squirming

  • LOL! She didn't take down anyone. She got owned because the book said exactly what Matthews said it did. She disagreed and then got angry when she was proven wrong like the insufferable c*nt that she is. She's no different than Ann Coulter.

  • @HTHAMMACK1 That's not what Matthews said the book said. The book gave AG's opinion of the war, and in an interview he clarified that he does not think the administration had that opinion. CW is grasping at straws and pretending he won. If one can't admit the huge difference between an author's opinion, who is not an expert on the subject, and an assertion assumed from that opinion, you are either too stupid to understand or you are lying to defend Matthew's lie. This is media twist.

  • Chris mathews is such a rat little creep.

  • The war is about oil, well the troops are coming home and still no oil! Chris Mathews you stupid scum.

  • God I love her!

  • If the war WAS for oil then why isn't gas 50 cents a gallon?

  • Chris Matthews - Soft Ball

  • Chris Mathews is an absolute fool. I've implored many a misinformed dipshit to give me cold hard proof that America has been siphoning off Iraq's oil wealth, nobody has ever been able to provide a single credible source, ever.

    This war for oil spiel is a load of shit.

  • BTW, @Vasp, I'm actually a middle class US citizen, good job being an arrogant ass and assuming "I support the rich and rich only" this is exactly what I'm talking about, you moronic, ignorant liberals that think you know everything when in reality you know NOTHING!

  • @vasp99, nope. You're the idiot, try actually buying yourself an argument instead of just tossing around insults like a child. Hey, maybe Obama will lend your his teleprompter then you and I can discuss something. But I won't hold my breath since you're moronic lib.

  • @MKF30 Life is too short to waste time arguing with scum and idiots . I've made my opinion of you known . Now go slobber on your knuckles so they don't chafe while dragging the ground .

  • @vasp99, yeah and what facts are those? Liberal lies? Get a clue moron.

  • @MKF30 Are you a multimillionaire ? If not then you're a stupid tool of your wealthy masters and I have only contempt for your inferiority and stupidity . The facts and information are all right in front of you and you're too stupid to get it .

  • @vasp99 WTF does me having to be a multi-millionaire have to do with you lacking facts and you just going around insulting people who disagree with you? I guess you're stupid too then since you're not a millionaire either. Really? Most flawed ABC logic I've ever heard. No, the facts are what Laura said that's why your retarded Chris won't admit it and keeps talking about "oil" over and over, you're an ignorant tool of the mainstream media. Yeah, you're right so next time keep your mouth shut.

  • Comment removed

  • Facts don't seem to matter to the bottom feeders that have posted on this page .

  • The war was not, at the root, about oil? With this statement Ingraham loses all credibility. Nuff said.

  • Disregarding whether or not I like Matthews, I don't see how Ingraham "takes down" Matthews in this particular video. I'm either or crazy pills, or I clearly saw her just repeating "I don't care" towards the end of the video, while Matthews, though rather harshly, pushes the question he had been asking since the beginning of the video.

  • I have many family members in the military,many that served in the recent wars.There are two reasons Bush+dickhead went to war in Iraq.One,to kill Saddam so Bush could make his "Victory speech"and the second is war profiteering.End of story.

  • I don't know who was hotter there.Was it Chrissy with tingle up his Barney Frank nylon or that awesome beautiful conservative powerful women.I don't think I need a coin toss to decide that.I'll go for the pretty blond.lol.the one with the vagina.

  • So I guess whatever Greenspan says must be absolute truth? Matthews is truly an amateur.

  • Chris is a smarmy rat bastard. He needs to have his clock cleaned. What a dispicable, socialist, whack job.

    Give him hell Laura.

  • @GutpileCharlie she's looks good lol

  • @GutpileCharlie Matthews is everything this country should flush down the fucking toilet. A gin soaked fat posh twat loudmouth cocksucker who needs to be cuntpunched. Words cannot describe the contempt I have for this slimy little worm.

  • @432ps1 ...Amen brother. He is one smarmy , rat bastrd, chicken shit son of a bitch. To hell with him and all like him.

  • @GutpileCharlie Damn straight! All like Chris Matthews should be used for slingshot practice :) then they'd at least have a purpose lol

  • @MKF30 You've got it right brother.

  • "It's hard to face the truth" :)

  • You would think Chris wouldn't mess with smart woman!

  • You'd think that Chrisdumass would get tired of being butt-pegged by Fox News Chicks!

  • Love you Laura! Love seeing cm getting his a** kicked by a girl. Maybe next time you could pick on someone your own size...mentally. ;)

  • No! Don't let him get all Smarmy, he'll be worthless... ah... oh no, too late.

  • @mr300ism you poor liberals, cursing is so much easier than having a point of view of your own, If only Obama and his teleprompter were here then you would know what to say!.hahaha

  • Too bad for Matthews and all 200 of his viewers.

  • @turntapzap LMFAO!!! Zing!!

  • @nolaeast, wow yeah because my mother needs that to be proud of me....

    It's called the truth spoken thru jest, look it up. Secondly, concerning your "Obama killed Bin Laden lmao" no he didn't, he merely took credit for something that was well under investigation under the Bush administration...Clinton had his chance, passed. Bush didn't and Obama is going to try to USE that to get re-elected, even though his principles are the opposite with "wanting to negotiate with terrorists" get a clue...

  • dumbass

  • He is dumb,and MSNBS is full crap and anyone with any brains do not watch it.

  • The point is , why are you in Iraq if you dont know why you are there.

  • WTF happened to Chris Matthews? I used to like him.

    God forbid companies make profits.

  • I am so glad that Laura Ingraham corrected this fool. Chris Matthews is wrong. If the war was about oil, where is the oil? We are still paying high prices for oil and the war and oil don't mix.

  • @Bobemakk She didn't want to mess with chrisasses twisted thinking with facts and truth. He might loose that tingle up his leg(SIC)

  • @robie0788 I like your response, you are a patriot. Thanks, Bob

  • Chris Matthews is the biggest piece of shit on TV. I'd like to put my fist through his head. Face that truth you lying sack of dogshit.

  • Chris matthews is such a scum bag.

  • But, you're a puss.

  • @nolaeast, no the mainstream media has corrupted your logic. My comment has among the top thumbs up for a reason guy ;). Laura is 10x smarter then the typical liberal and 100x smarter then Chris Matthews...

  • @MKF30 you are so right.

  • Isn't it strange how we'll not drill for oil in this country and set-up nuclear powers plants (as obama promised during his campaign) to take care of our needs, yet politicians have every excuse in the world to involve us with dangerous middle-eastern saps? This serves as another reason why we need to take a sludge hammer to this antiquated political system that permits these danger fools to lead us into h*ll and replace them with home computers to carryout the will of the people!

    Am I right?!

  • Allen Greenspan, the failed Federal Reserve Chairman, is a national defense expert? News to me.

  • BEWARE: Obama`s CANCER RESEARCH GRANT is nothing more than a BACKDOOR-BAILOUT to BIG PHARMA !!!

    Obama is planning to dish-out several BILLIONS of DOLLARS in so-called ``RESEARCH GRANTS`` to MERCK and other pharmaceutical companies !

    Officially this money is for cancer research, but in reality its going to help keep these companies afloat !!!

    OBAMA and RICK PERRY both support this measure... make sure that both of these MORONS dont get to the WHITE-HOUSE !!!

  • don't you all get it yet ..we went in iraq.and afganastan the bordering countrys of iran to scare iran into thinking we will go after them to stop them from making a atom bomb,,how else can we justify sending drones into thier country with out have others call the UN on us..it is all coming together ain't ..

  • Ingraham got OWNED!!

  • @Saebeck32 Ah, no?

  • @nolaeast, lol dude you're the idiot...not Laura.

  • @MKF30 Fox has harmed your logic. Laura is one dumb ass.

  • @nolaeast h Laura Is very succesful, sold millions of books, Beautiful, Commands six figures at speeches. No its you the dumbass. Fucking moron.

  • @Trashfished Your definition of success is warped like a republican presidential candidate. Charles Manson has also written books. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. You see beautiful, where others see evil. Martin Luther King and Mohandas Gandhi did not charge so mush for their speeches and I am sure more people read and listen to what they have to say. Who cares what Laura has to say besides republican dumb asses like you?

  • Whoever thinks the Iraq war was about oil is either dumb or willfully blind to the facts. The US isn't controlling a single oil field in Iraq and hasn't since the War began, besides temporarily militarily. The US has seen huge increases in the price of crude since the beginning of the war in 2003 which would be impossible if we had hundreds of millions of barrels flood the market. The US gave the oil to the Iraqi's to help rebuild their country. We didn't even pay ourselves let alone steal it!!

  • Chris Matthews is a scumbag and so is Chuck " The Fuck" Todd!!!

  • @DarthSideous63 I agree Chris Mathews is a idiot

  • What is wrong with this Bitch. Laura is dumb as a piece of shit.

  • @nolaeast Your are surely mistaken, Laura is very smart and intelligent

  • @nolaeast Back up your assertion. What did she say or do to make you say this?

  • @nolaeast Ah, is that you intellect showing? I mean, she proved, right on the air, that:

    "Chris he did not say that the Bush Administration got into the war in Iraq because of oil."

    Then Chris reads himself : "The Iraq War is largely about oil."

    Chris fails to notice the quote says nothing about the intentions of the Bush Admin, and fails to notice that oil was not singled out as the sole reason for the conflict.

    Most big problems in the Arab world are tied to oil, US or no.

  • @RyderSpearmann You are right. Bush had no intentions. He was simply doing what the oil companies told him to do. Go to War. Go to war with a country that did not attack us, had nothing to do with 911 and did not have WMDs. That war cost this country over 4000 of our best people. Lives for lies, it's the republican way.

  • @nolaeast Yes and not to mention the countless innocent Iraqi lives lost.Dead innocent children whose only crime was being born in a country with oil.The people of the world are praying the American people wake up and do something about their government.For the sake of humanity please stop killing people for profit.

  • @nolaeast You know how retarded that sounds, right?

    Nice conspiracy theory, tin-foil-hat boy. Let's forget that you have NO evidence of your bizzare theory...

    We ALREADY KNOW that Iraq violated the Gulf War cease fire agreement, that BY ITSELF causes a resumption of conflict. To hell with WMD's. That's just icing on the cake. We KNOW that Clinton threatened war with Iraq over the cease fire violations.

    We know that UN sanctions killed 500,000 children. Bush stopped that.

    Many lives saved.

  • @RyderSpearmann Damn good point dude! These libs know nothing lol but what else is new right? lol

  • Wow, tea bags seriously don't know how facts work do they.

    If you say something and believe it hard enough even thought there is no EVIDENCE to support it, it becomes a fact in the Republican world(so as long as you agree with them).

    Mean while in the real world, EVERYONE IS LAUGHING AT YOU TEA BAGS FOR BEING PLAIN IDIOTS.

    I LAUGH AT YOU IDIOTS,

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA­SHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH­AHAHAHA

  • @Ptunior before I even respond your goofy comment, can you tell me (what in the hell are you talking about with this "tea bags" deal). I'm so lost after your brilliant comment about people "laughing at us idiots" (hahaha) what's that all about?...shoot off something that makes sense and we'll (TRY) to help you out to understand son.

  • @Dawn, who said Saddam was a terrorist? Himself, no. An Evil dictator who aided and associated with terror cells? Yes. lol, Laura wasn't interrupting she was making her point and then Chris being his usual idiotic self was trying to overpower her while she was making her point so she raised her voice...watch the video again and try to watch....Laura in various interviews is very soft spoken but firm on her views. She's not a bitch, but Chris is a chode and he was wrong as Laura proved.

  • @MKF30 Brovo! you hit it on the nail...It's funny how when a Repulican say's anything about anyone on the Liberal side, we're Racists or Homo-fobes or god frobid an African American say's a word about them he's an Uncle Tom or they'll rip he's life apart like Clearance Thomas or Herman Cane...Like you I feel Laura was very patient and put up with him interrupting and acting like a child, but what do the Libs. say "she's a total bitch!" and not one person in the media say's a word? Wow!

  • @darrono

    No, it is when you include little hints about it, like calling Obama a Socialist, or any other word that comes out of the presidential candidates from your side is socialist, despite the meaning being something different and always talking about the black issues, such as the black panthers, which was on 3 straight weeks as one of the main stories by faux news. Cause the BlackPanthers are such a threat to America, ALL 2 OF THEM.

    Yes, a lot of you Tea Bags are bigots, Oreilly agrees.

  • @darrono Exactly! Thanks dude! Yeah, I hear that shit all the time and I'm technically a minority. I'm latino but have some white blood in me, so I get idiots all the time telling me "why aren't you liberal" lol as if I have to be or something...it's very insulting. Of course, the media are a bunch of leftwing asslickers that will only tell the people what THEY want you to hear, a smart person doesn't listen to the mainstream media.

  • @darrono Owe, there you go dude, already we irked someone lol. @Ptunior, lol wow your post proves how moronic you liberals are seriously. First off all, "tea bag" and "tea partier" are two entirely different thing. O'Reilly is a smart guy but is more in the middle, he also feels radical liberals such as yourself are PINHEADS. But I prefer ignorant imbeciles ;)

  • You must not have anything to protest today? (but what in the Hell are you talking about?) Did you even watch the same video? it's the one above the comments, you should press play and than you give a comment...They have directions i'm pretty sure but if you need help? please left us (middle-road Republicans) help you...It seems like that's all we do these days for you guys...

  • Chris is like a liitle kid that doesn't get his way, he reminds of my son stomping his feet and crying his eyes out until you bend. This guy works for a major media co. they sould just change the name from MSNBC to "Home of The Liberal Left!", Ingraham clearly kicked his ass on the details but like a little kid wouldn't let it go...How's that "worm tingly felling up your leg" feel now?...How's that for (Objective Reporting?)...What's next Chris "a rub and a tug" for the President?

  • @darrono What's it like being completely delusional?

  • @Rimbaud1531 Seriously! that's all I get? I was looking for all of the Liberal talking points, after all that I put into that comment?...Well, if you think of something bring it up...I know your Idiol needs a telepromter but in this case you have time to think about it...Please be nice though, most Liberals get mean and say nasty sware words?...Have a great night.

  • @darrono lol your post is epic win! You're right, so true. The typical lib will resort to personal potshots(palin smearing *cough*cough* with her daughter*cough*cough) most of them just drink the koolaid without question but here and there, you do find a logical one. As hard as that is to say logical and liberal in the same sentence....lol doesn't usually comply lol

  • @darrono I was just referring to your take on this interview.

  • I love when Laura Ingraham and Ann Coulter completely exasperate and discombobulate this oily Mathews. Like two siamese kittens playing with a dead cricket.

  • Sorry, but you must be a typical stupid right wing pig since you missed the fact that Matthews was 100% correct about the book, or charitably. you may just be hard at hearing,

  • @DawnOfTheDead991 Excellent!

  • @1010Huey Yeah, stupidity usually does 'exasperate' people.

  • @1010Huey EXCELLENT analogy! 

  • Comment removed

  • @DawnOfTheDead99, lol, oh the hypocrisy...umm I'm pretty sure if you go back to the comments you addressed and mocked MY view first, so you may want to take a bit of your own advice there...and what does Bush and Iraqy have to do with Laura totally stuffing down Chris here and him constantly interrupting her? That's your opinion, some presidents don't back down to others, some do. Bush is not one of them. So please don't lecture me about being "immature".

  • @MKF30 You bitch did not stuff anyone down, Matthews completely put her in her place by reading from the book. Grow up!

  • Comment removed

  • she slammed mathews lol dumbass liberal idiot!

  • Comment removed

  • well the iraq war sure as hell wasn't about freedom and democracy!

  • if the war was about oil Chris, where are all those oil contracts??? dumbass

  • How was Mathews "taken down"? it sounds like he was right and she got fact checked. Laura saying "i dont care what greenspan wrote", at the end is basically backing out of a point in which she was incorrect on. Do you people need hearing aids? is it drugs? Saying Laura won this exchange is simply stupid.

  • @YoungTon22 I couldn´t have said it better my self.  You are a 100% right!!!!

  • exactly !

  • Chris Matthews got OWNED!!!

    The last 30 seconds was painful to watch. I felt embarrassed for him.

  • Ok, then DawnoftheDead if Chris is SOO right, then why is is Laura totally owned him on every question, why does he look scared of her questions, why does he suddenly interrupt her as he does with everyone as a lame tactic to try to compensate for losing an argument...notice btw, the number one rated/liked comment brings up...because it's TRUE. What are you talking about....clearly you and I are watching two separate videos or you're seeing what you want to see.

  • BTW, @ Dawn yeah oh the hypocrisy because you liberals just use personal attacks on someone's family or PAST when you run against someone, get a clue...P.S. stick to pole dancing, no wonder you have such a warped view on politics...that's such a credible job right there lol

  • Yeah, actually most rightwingers I know have more balls then you pussy ass liberals who want to negotiate with fucking terror cells lmao...

  • @MKF30 And Bush didn't do that when appropriate, like in Iraq? Are you so immature that you can't agree with someone just because you don't like him or his politics?

  • Comment removed

  • I respond not to the video but to the respondents.  It is clear that depending on your politics you can see and hear whatever you want. And the people on the Democrat side of the issue as usual seem to be filled with hate. As evidenced by their comments. This is a classic form of fallacy of argument known as an ad hominem attack. This form of argument is resorted to when the person using it has no other argument or simply resorts to this tactic because of intellectual laziness.

  • Really?? seems like most of lot of hate & garbage are coming from the right here, like the , So like Laura, you not just wrong, but totally dishonest!.Greenspan wrote in the book the war was about oil, Matthews was correct, she lied, end debate.

  • @Dawn, yes she owned him.

  • No, either you are lying, or have very poor audio comprehension skills. Greenspan wrote in the book the war was about oil. Your talk radio bitch said otherwise, She lied, was proven wrong BY MATTHEWS QUOTING THE BOOK THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT!, end debate. It just can't get any simpler. My problem is that I am trying to reason with people devoid of reason

  • ....and how much oil did we get or how much in funds did we receive in reparations for ridding Iraq of Saddam and his twisted spawn?.....not one fucking dime. Matthews you are an arrogant flat faced butt sniffer.

  • He was quite correct, you stupid right winger. He was quoting Greenspan's book accurately while that witch was lying. That is what Greenspan wrote, so quit being in denial. We have had our military forces in the Persian Gulf for 30+ years to guard the supply of oil, So read a book and use your mind before ranting!

  • @DawnOfTheDead991 Before you look at Metthews, of all imbociles, for correct information, do yourself a favor and actually do some research! Start with Adam Smith, then Alexis de Tocqueville, maybe even Howard Kershner. You act as if you know what you're talking about getting info purely from pmsnbc, moveon.org, and your booty-buddy BO. Fact is, you're nieve, poorly uninformed, and the definition of gullible for believing the Marxist morons like Matthews. Now go do some reading

  • Exuse me, you pompous, dishonest jerk. This has nothing to do witt Adam Smith, Let me break it down simple so even your little mind can comprehend. Greenspan wrote in the book the war was about oil, Laura said otherwise. Matthews then quoted his book to prove the bitch wrong. Matthews was correct, she lied, end debate. Southern gent, no; redneck white trash yes,. I am no Marxist,you pathetic right wing pig;

  • @dsoutherngent1 But you look to assholes with a talk radio shows to fill your head,

  • @DawnOfTheDead991 ....you're off the point Einstein, read what I wrote. What Greenspan may have written and the actions that took place were very different. So, how much oil did we get in reparation for our efforts in Iraq? Zero. Before you go off talking about shit you, nor Chris Matthews has any inkling about, I would suggest you take you own advice....and just for the record we have been in the Middle-East a helluva lot longer than 30 years....

  • @55slice Sorry but you either are a liar or a retard. Matthews was 100% correct & your bitch was wrong. It had nothing to do with reparations. But here's a scenario even someone of your base intellect can grasp. If there was no oil there, would we have any reason to be there? Would they be able to afford any weapons better than rifles or ww ll surplus maybe? We are there to protect the world's main reservoir of oil. Too bad, like most of her dimwit fans, you are too lame to grasp that

  • @DawnOfTheDead991 ...you really are daft aren't you? I never said Matthews misquoted, I said we didn't receive any reparations for the actions taken in Iraq. You're too caught up in your liberal mindset to actually read what I've written three times now. As for Ingraham who knows what her or anyone else's answers are since Matthews is a rude bastard and won't let anyone answer without his interruptions. Once again how much in reparationsn has ANY of the coalition countries received from Iraq?

  • @55slice No, not daft, nor dishonest like you. No one, either Matthews or Greenspan said anything about reparations, even Laura.You are using a red herring.Their point is that the abundance of oil allowed Saddam to get powerful, like how did they get the money for all those weapons, from selling rugs & figs? Then protecting the supply of oil was the root of our involvement there. Oil is the root of it all, so stuff your simple talk radio lib vs con nonsense & poke your head out of your hole.

  • @DawnOfTheDead991 ...they didn't say it, I did. The argument with all liberals is we went in for the oil, either for finacial gain or to protect it. Protect it from what? Saddam already had control of it for the past 30 years, 15 of them as our ally against Iran. He had also armed himself to the teeth with the procedes from selling it, again years ago. So what was the point of going in just for oil that we got no gain from? To protect the "world" supply? Get real. It was to get rid of Saddam.

  • Greenspan is not a liberal, and that is what he wrote in his book. So you can pull your right wing talk radio tricks and insult Matthews and liberals all you want but it doesn't change the fact that Matthews was correct about what Greenspan wrote. And as far as being rude and interrupting goes, well your bitch Laura is even worse. Outside of the US, no one buys any of your neocon "Saddam the terrorist" rubbish.

  • @DawnOfTheDead991 ...you keep on with your Right Wing "rubbish", I am a middle-road Democrat dipshit and have been since '73. All I'm doing is asking questions and posing them for thought, nothing more. Yet fools such as yourself automaticly form the stereotype based on questions and the manners of a TV host and moniker me. Fairly typical of your ilk. Saddam wasn't a terroist, at least in the States, and would still be in power had he complied with UN sanctions and inspections, he chose poorly.

  • @55slice Exactly, that's all he fucking does...constantly interrupts people he debates with because he can't find a counter argument to save his life...he's just another liberal tool like the idiotic Michael Moore and Keith Obermann...

    @Dawn, oil is apart of it it's not ALL of it...example, fucking terrorists who hide out in Iraq have nothing to do with oil, get a clue and big shock, that happens to be where they're from half the time. Go figure.

  • chris is terrified this type of discussion, anywhere, anytime, could lead to zionism, the neocons, and israel and the israel lobbby--the cause of the war. he is the ultimate major media "type." this is a man who knows how NOT to lose a job!

  • Love Laura, but I can already see what's gonna happen. Obama's gonna win a squeaker against Romney. The American public is too stoopid to realize just what a socialist clown they have in there now. Or, don't care. Who knows? Bam spent his first 2 years apologizing for the country he hates and using San Fran Nan to force a bill thru that the majority of the USA didn't want but alas... here we are! Obama ... hate the rich and take it away from them to cure our ills... pathetic..

  • Chris Matthews is a lying coward and it would serve the country best if he were removed from this life completely.

  • Laura Ingraham needs a good, ol' fashioned, Liberal dick down.

  • @PCHardwareTech actually she OWNED Chris Matthews....and good. She brought him down. Matthews kept changing his story and she called him on his bulllshit.

  • Is there any question the Iraq war had to do with oil? Yes there were other motives but, would we have gone and fought the war (all of it 1 and 2) if there was not oil in the Middle East? No we would not have we have and continue to watch dictators kill their people on a regular basis all the time. Keep in mind oil is a National Interest, we need it so we insure the stability of the region to some extent, as we should.

  • @TheTruthHurts9999, you may want to re-watch the video because YES Laura owned Matthews with ease lmao...you may want to wake up one morning and not take your daily does of "Stupid liberal" and actually see things from a logical perspective. Sure, Laura is rightwing and Chris is leftwing but who's right here? Oh yeah...Laura, she took him down faster then Ali would take down Mike Tyson..

  • @MKF30 No she didn't! She all but admitted he was right around 2:48. God, you are terribly dense or a poor listener

  • @DawnOfTheDead991 Actually you're an ignorant tool of the liberal media if you really think that, Chris is a tool too, and Laura is 10x smarter then he is. She's smarter and owns him on her worst day, that's how pathetic he is...you're the one that's dense.

  • Excuse me, but not only was Matthews correct, but he read the book & used Greenspan's quote to put that self righteous bitch right back in her place. That is the truth, and she all but admitted it at 1:53. She said that Greenspan didn't say the war was about oil, he read out Greenspan's book and proved her wrong. It just can't get any simpler! So what are you babbling about?

  • @MKF30 Ingram is smarter you fucking retard?........ From Greenspans Book (which I read) A DIRECT QUOTE: "I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone already knows: the Iraq War is largely about oil."

    So now why dont you be a man and tell everyone how Ingram was lying and Mathews was telling the truth.. But of course you wont. All you right wingers have tiny tiny little balls.

  • Chris Mathews is a Stalinist Osamabama boot licker. Like his master, he is happy with shutting down any domestic fossil fuel energy production, destroying industry and throwing Americans out of work. And all for a ultra left wing agenda. He is vile.

  • Chris Mathews, do not ever let your guard down, your mouth and your stupidity will eventually catch up with you, never forget, you still live in a physical world. Your loose "canon style" of ignorant miss truths reach many people on satellite via TV and Internet. What are the odds that the animal may quickly turn and bite? You know what I am speaking about, take care my friend.

  • Completely mislabed video - Ingraham didnt take down anybody. Both of these two are 'smarmy' people - but Matthews held his own as screechy Ingarham attempted to erase parts of a book that didnt fit her political narrative.

  • If USA drills for its own oil, energy independant , won't have this issue!!! Almost 1 trillion in two wars over oil. Drill baby drill!!!

  • Laura is fucking awesome, she's smarter then all the dumb tools on msnbc put together and smarter then a lot of Fox people too. She holds her own with Bill O, which many can't or struggle to do...she's fucking awesome, I love her! She should run for President! Chris Matthews is a fucking idiot.

  • Laura can't help being a bitch so I almost can't even get mad at her.

  • Chris Matthews: it's hard to face the truth. Translation: it's hard for Chris to face the truth.

  • Wait, wait, wait. If it was all about oil, then why the holy fuck am I still paying 4 bucks a gallon? I call bullshit.

  • @arivas71being 'about oil' doesn't mean it's about cheap oil for you,dumbass.

  • @dobbsiancant Well then. Cheap oil for who? I get what you mean, not me specifically, but Americans in general. oh and sorry for the super-late reply, I went on vacation. this must come at you like from 1,000 years ago or something.

  • @arivas713 haha.i don't know what the question is anymore.you'd think the 'tube' would have someway to link comments and replies.they used to highlight your (meaning my) comments in yellow,at least.i prefer the old format,anyway.and i can't scroll through weeks of comments to find my original post.so in the word's of the late emily letela_'never mind'.hope your your vacation was pleasant.ta.

  • He is smarmy, isn't he?

  • Matthews really shows her up to be the ignorant fool she is!!! wow! thanks for posting!

  • @charlesanddog TYpical left wing sheep you are.

  • Laura is not in the same league as Chris. She is a right wing sporksman defending the worst president in US history.

  • Laura is much smarter than Chris, but that does not make Chris completely wrong.

  • All oil that comes out of Iraq goes through OPEC. Where it is purchased by countries around the world, including the USA.

    ZERO oil goes from Iraq to the USA never has never will.

  • Wow... What a fucking idiot. "I believe it's page 232"... Yeah because the audience cares, and the page number matters. Hello Bill O'Reilly, please tell me how I'm dumb for [insert something that doesn't matter] and therefore you're right! Say it like I'm a dumbass and therefore I must be a dumbass.

    What a condescending cuntwheel fatty fat

  • absolutely love laura's noise at 2:00 fabulous

  • @midatlanticcycle yea too bad she was lying.

  • chris matthews blows dox dix. period. end of story

  • Chris Mathews has one debate tactic: Interupt the other person to throw off their chain of though. But a lot of times when he does it it looks like he's interupting them to shut them up because they are saying things that make him nervous.

  • @anywayokay From Greenspans Book (which I read) A DIRECT QUOTE: "I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone already knows: the Iraq War is largely about oil." THERE IT IS YOU FUCKING RETARD RIGHT OUT OF THE BOOK YOU DIDNT READ. NEXT TIME TRY DOING SOME HOMEWORK BEFORE TALKING OUT OF YOUR ASS. NOW LETS SEE HOW MUCH OF A MAN YOU ARE. GET ON HERE AND TELL US HOW CORRECT MATTHEWS WAS AND HOW THAT CUNT INGRAM WAS LYING.

  • @Phillysoc Don't waste your time, these people are denser than lead. All they are doing is letting their hate of Matthews twist their little minds so much that they refuse to see that he was correct. He reads out of the book then she agrees with him but denigrates Greenspan but somehow she won. Their's and her debating tactics are to call someone a liberal Commie Obamabot baby killer, and you win automatically.

  • @DawnOfTheDead991 Its amazing how inbred some of the right wingers are. Not to worry. They will eat it when Obama is re-elected for another 4

  • @anywayokay Laura Ingraham does the same thing. ALL news reporters do that. You cannot just say that one does it without saying that all of them do because they all do it.

  • Chris Matthews is a propagandist for the hard left, and lies like a carpet. He should tarred, feathered, and carried off the set tied to a rail.

  • matthews is an insipid Ass and the tingle he has for barak obummer, is running DOWN his leg !!!

  • Comment removed

  • Laura was the one that was schooled, sad she and OP aren't smart enough to notice 

  • Liberals love to say one of two things: either the the war was fought for oil or Bush lied about WMD to get revenge for daddy. I say the war was fought because Saddam had violated 17 UN resolutions in the 12 years since the cease fire in 1991, which was conditional upon Saddam's cooperation with the UN. Couple that with suspicion that Saddam had WMD along with nuclear ambitions less that 2 years after 9/11 and the risk Saddam posed had become intorlerable. The world is better off without Saddam.