Whoever said you can get 11's with a N/A Civic is stupid and doesn't know anything about imports (I've had 14 Honda's) Nice mustang man keep it up.....
No offense but that sucked. BUT that is a great starting point. We all have to start somewhere. Good luck with your very nice looking mustang. I started my mustang at 13.50 and got to 10.96 until last night when my supercharger came apart and took out my motor. So now on to bigger and better. Good luck
tell you the truth... honda civics can get 11's naturally aspirated no turbos... its build is on forums by the way.... but i am getting a 351w 11.2 sec n/a 2,500 lbs car 351w is similar to 302 but 5.8l
I would take a 14-15 second Mustang over a 12-13 second Honda any day of the week. You just can't get that throaty sound a V8 makes out of a Honday engine no matter how much horsepower you have.
@H0M3RC1D4L plus if you want a fox body mustang to be faster than any streetlegal honda on this planet you just need to bore&stroke the 302 engine to 347ci
and tada - the 14-15 second mustang jumps into the 11´s-12´s - EASILY
there are even 10 second 347 strokers = faster than any piece of shit front wheel driven honda :)))))
@3O2MuStAnG Yes...I know this, I should know this since I own a 2002 GT and a 1982 GT with forged internals plus a laundry list of other goodies. I was just making a point that a bone stock Mustang is preferable to any tuned Honda as far as I'm concerned. BTW, my 82 has seen 2 boosted Hondas and a boosted Mitsubishi...well, it was looking backward at the time because they couldn't keep up!
this guy that lives across the street from me has a 5.0 he fucking tuned it and drags it and well when he takes it out to drive at 12 am it will wake ur ass up easy lol
I agree. I am putting a 5.0 out of a 1988 mustang into a 1934 street rod. What exhaust do you guys recommend? The engine has AFR CNC ported aluminum heads, a Comp cam, and headers.
i personally hate hondas and am also a 5.0 owner, but you have to give the rice car the acceleration advantage over the 5.0, its been recorded by plenty of track members, its not to say they are better just quick, but its just a 50/50 possibility
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hate is another type of jealousy my friend. Don't hate us Honda's just because you only see our rear bumpers all the time. Also not all Honda are Rice, it's just that MOST (not are ricers) teenagers (or some stupid person) get Honda's from their parents because they are reliable cars and then they ruin them with stickers, huge body kits and the giant PepBoys wing. But most Honda's are actually well tuned cars, which apparently you cant keep up with despite being a V8 and us a 4cyl :).
First off no its not jelousy, you have that confused with people who enter areas that carry items they loath, and try to run there mouth, Two I am not your friend... and I'venever been left by a honda, hell nissans have giving me a hell of a run but Honda? just trash a step behind always a step behind that VVT system they carry is a nissan setup under a different name
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Vtec was the first type of variable valve timing that executed the cams...nissan and toyota later copied or did it in their own method with their systems (MIVEC, VVT, and nissan's system whose name I don't remember but the redesigned it with the new VQ37 engine, the one in 370z and G37's)... second I was only here because a friend of mine has one of these and he wanted to know how much they run without paying $50 for a dyno...last, the only nissan STOCK faster than Honda is the Z thats about it.
lol. Hp per dollar nothing beats a fox mustang. Have fun trying to get horsepower with your civic, crx, blah blah blah at a reasonable price. Trust me, 7k down the drain in a turbo Integra that only makes 275whp? Get the hell outta here or come over to the good side my friend.
I always LAUGH at how STUPID The Toyota advertisers are when they make Lexus commercials! How come when you watch a LEXUS car commercial, something that's built by Asains, you always have a European sounding annoncer in ALL of the videos??? Makes me think they are selling over priced cars to the WEAK minded?
haha ok so if mustangs are so great, and the ford engine is so good explain this, the new Lexus IS-F makes 415HP and over 350 lb-f of torque, and is a 5.0, also that car is heavier, and is still faster, and does over 30 mpg on the highway, and almost 30 in town. thats why japanese cars are much better than this shitty american trash
.... have fun paying for replacements parts on ur pos lexus when u fuck something up since you wotn be able to fidn the parts any where, i hope u got a real deep pocket
Yeah you're also comparing a 5.0L from the time of the 80s to a car of today. Besides that year mustang is a excellent platform to build off of because it is cheap, there are several parts for it and wether you have the 2.3 or 5.0 doesn't matter because they are both VERY buildabe. For under 3K you can build a 5.0 to do 12.2 in a 1/4. Your not going to get a lexus to do that for under 10K considering to get the car itself, is over 10K
the brand new mustangs still have really poor power.... especially for the size of the engine... and lexus's are very reliable and dont break down... i have an old 93 LS400, and its got 600,000 km's and ive never had to replace anything, my parents freind drove it from new and he only did the basic things, timing belt, etc. they last forever.
What are you smoking? The new mustangs are faster than the old ones. It took ford a 429 to get 13s in a 1/4 where as today they can get it with a 4.6L The new 4.6LSOHC is making 300HP that is alot off of a SOHC when Ford's old DOHC 4.6L was making 305. Only if they redesigned the old DOHC. The engine in my mustang is over 19 years old and has had over 260,000 miles on it and it had a shot crank, cam, pistons, bearings, ect. and it still ran! Even broken a Ford will still run.
Dont break down? any car will break down. it is all how you take care of it. thats only 375000 miles. impressive, but not unheard of. my dad had a 97 F150 that he ran mobil 1 full synthetic in. at 312000 miles he took it for emissions testing and it came out like burning right out of the factory.
Sweet ride. I myself love AODs. I live in the city. Hate pedal and clutch on steep hills. The stock AOD is not strong but once they are built right, they can go over 100k even with hard driving and shifting.
thanks man, i found a very clean 89 5.0 completely stock w/ 62,000 miles for 6,000 im definitly thinkin about purchasing it this weekend, what do u think?
i own an 04 cobra a 99cobra and an 04GT and im definitly looking to add a 5.0 to the stable, but ive only drivin stock 5.0's how are they once u do a few bolt on's
they really seem to resond well. heads cam intake and gears will wake up a five-oh. they're pretty light and handle well. you'd definatly not regret it, a bit cheaper than your cobras too :P
Todays engines are rated way above the normal driving range. I would rather have a 325hp 400 lbs tq at 3500 rpm than a 400hp 325 tq at 5500 rpm engine. Older engines were made for torque. 302 were quite torquey and that's the fun.
You can take a stock 87-93 5.0 add a cheap used turbo kit for around 1500 and beat damn near any car on the street today...Name any other car out there that comes anywhere remotely close to a 5.0 mod for mod...NOTHING
uhmm.. im sorry, i own a mustang but i know this statement is false. you could easily take a LS1 powered car, throw a turbo on it and make well over what a 5.0 will make. stock bottom end 5.0 motors start tearing themselves apart after 500HP,where as ive seen stock bottom end LS1's pushing 650+ ... but anyway, nice fox. what numbers did you get and whats done to it?
this is true. but there are a bunch of block options for the windsor engines now so 500+ is no sweat. with money and time anything can be fast, just depends on what you like.
ok you guys dont understand.... yes a 5.0 doesnt have alot of hp but al you young guys think all you need to go fast is hp...they have like 300 torque and plus i used to build civics and v6s ...this mustang can have 600 hp with 2000 bucks remember
LOL. Dont forget a little thing called Torque! 5.0 250-300lbs Torque. Civic 120lbs. LOL. you still lose! HP don't mean shit unless you can put it on the ground!
yea but the 87-93 are way faster than the 05 v6 models....trust me i own the 88 and my sis got the 05 v6...my car is bone stock and will SMOKE the new one
u will smoke the new one? or have u even tried cuz the 99-04 have 190, thats a big jump from the 94-98 which only had 145, plus the newer v6's have more hp then that...even if u beat that..it would be by a hair. the only thing u might by is ur acceleration...u might have some type of posi, or a locker..whereas the newers v6's one wheel peel around. Not dissing the older GT's or anything im just saying it should be more for a v8. I own a 99 3.8 and i'd give u a run for ur money ;)
LOL. don't forget that the 05's and up stangs are fucking tanks. LOL. Plus they have OB3 technology for better performance and emissions. Dont try to compare HP from two way different gen. mustangs!
This car, like my 89, is a GT. The SVT Cobra had a different rear bumper cover, wing, tail lights, nose, ground effects, and wheels, along with numerous engine changes. It also had LX tailpipes that were visible, unlike the GT.
As far as the differences between the GT and LX, the GT was just a body kit added to an LX hatch. It also came standard with a sport interior. They're the exact same car under the skin.
Technically, yes, but not in the US, and they were nothing like the SVT Cobra. From 84-92, every Canadian GT was officially known as a Mustang Cobra GT. The 93 GTs sold in the Great White North dropped the Cobra designation to avoid confusion concerning the SVT Cobra, even though it wasn't sold up there. For the US market, the only Cobras were the 79-81 and 93 models.
sad isnt it. the cobra's were definitly some of the best mustangs out there. i dont consider gt500's mustangs either. I liked the boss's they had in the 90's shame they took those away too.
Not really, ford ditched the cobra for the new GT500 which this year is suppose to get 540HP to 600HP if you get the super snake, and ford is likely to bring some of the old mustangs back. There are rumors that the boss is coming back, and that in 09 ford is going to make several small and big engines optional all the way from 3.5L V6 to 5.8L V8
just get some longtubes wit a electric cutout wat some people dnt understand is when the car came out it had 180hp but its still a good engine just put some bolt ons a cam wit some spray u will be kicking ass.
It's taking some time, but I'm building up funds and buying car parts as steady as I can. It will be night and day once I put all the aftermarket bits on her.
I got a weird vibration in my tri-ax short shift, vibrates really bad at rpms over 3k. deffintly annoying right? lol...When you get the next dyno done though, be sure to put up a video.
Yup, I was hoping for a lot more. But it's bone stock, almost at 90,000miles on the odo at the time of that video and the AOD in her was slipping.
i have an e303, springs, and lifters waiting to go in but I'm having some unknown vibration in the driveline that I need to find and fix first. So i'm just waiting for money and time. She'll get there.
badass 5.0
lKingCobra 4 months ago
This is the greatest car ever made.
WeekendWarrior1210 10 months ago
sounds great!!!!!!
fomoco337 10 months ago
H22a7. Thats the one to have.
cupcakeflake 1 year ago
nothing lke a 5 liter ford
22hijodelmaiz 1 year ago
Old cars suck, get over your nostalgia ya bunch of hippies.
Silvertrine 1 year ago
I remember when I had my stock AOD '90. That thing was balls slow, oh my gosh. The 5-speed alone was like night and day.
N20LT4 1 year ago
Whoever said you can get 11's with a N/A Civic is stupid and doesn't know anything about imports (I've had 14 Honda's) Nice mustang man keep it up.....
turbodude06 1 year ago
@turbodude06 my boy ran 11.4 in a 1/4 mile all day in his eg hatch with a b20vtec setup mild build n/a so its definitly possible
RideHardInd 1 year ago
@RideHardInd i did the same in an 89 saleen with gt40 headers and twin kenne bells
MrDavidruffin 1 year ago
@MrDavidruffin
Really, twin kennebells huh?
fidstang 11 months ago 2
No offense but that sucked. BUT that is a great starting point. We all have to start somewhere. Good luck with your very nice looking mustang. I started my mustang at 13.50 and got to 10.96 until last night when my supercharger came apart and took out my motor. So now on to bigger and better. Good luck
72Horton 1 year ago
FYI, I have raced numerous "Rice Burners" over the years. I have never lost to any of them. My car runs high 11's on the motor.
pcmbdl01 2 years ago
tell you the truth... honda civics can get 11's naturally aspirated no turbos... its build is on forums by the way.... but i am getting a 351w 11.2 sec n/a 2,500 lbs car 351w is similar to 302 but 5.8l
Diminish420 2 years ago
all that was done was exhaust? what milage was on engine?
xtreme3484 2 years ago
I would take a 14-15 second Mustang over a 12-13 second Honda any day of the week. You just can't get that throaty sound a V8 makes out of a Honday engine no matter how much horsepower you have.
H0M3RC1D4L 2 years ago 26
@H0M3RC1D4L plus if you want a fox body mustang to be faster than any streetlegal honda on this planet you just need to bore&stroke the 302 engine to 347ci
and tada - the 14-15 second mustang jumps into the 11´s-12´s - EASILY
there are even 10 second 347 strokers = faster than any piece of shit front wheel driven honda :)))))
3O2MuStAnG 1 year ago
@3O2MuStAnG Yes...I know this, I should know this since I own a 2002 GT and a 1982 GT with forged internals plus a laundry list of other goodies. I was just making a point that a bone stock Mustang is preferable to any tuned Honda as far as I'm concerned. BTW, my 82 has seen 2 boosted Hondas and a boosted Mitsubishi...well, it was looking backward at the time because they couldn't keep up!
H0M3RC1D4L 1 year ago
@H0M3RC1D4L true - you rock ;D
3O2MuStAnG 1 year ago
@H0M3RC1D4L
Well that only matters if you value the bark over the bite....
jabba12000 1 year ago
HP AKA HUNTINGTON PARK LOL
ELAMABLE187 2 years ago
wats HP
lvkz10 2 years ago
Horsepower
FDC42585 2 years ago
honda vs. mustang who would win i think thats a e z question MUSTANG
funnyrobber 2 years ago 9
Results would be nice.....
lambofgod1371 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nice car dude, but I do have to say my 01 BULLITT has way more power than you 5.0. Buy really clean car.....
Cams01BULLITT 3 years ago
what a stupid thing to say lol.. what are u in high school???
SDHUMPUP 2 years ago
well he can say it right now because niether one has numbers to back it up
big88foxbodyfan 2 years ago
lol true
SDHUMPUP 2 years ago
this guy that lives across the street from me has a 5.0 he fucking tuned it and drags it and well when he takes it out to drive at 12 am it will wake ur ass up easy lol
airsoftsargent 3 years ago
I have the exact one, color and all...LOVE IT!
Nim718 3 years ago
Gotta love the 5 liter ford. Such a crisp, clean V8 sound. One of the best sounding 8 cylinder engines ever.
racernate02 3 years ago 22
I agree. I am putting a 5.0 out of a 1988 mustang into a 1934 street rod. What exhaust do you guys recommend? The engine has AFR CNC ported aluminum heads, a Comp cam, and headers.
strum456 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
5.0 mustangs suck!! just like ford...
86shortbox 3 years ago
you dont know shit about fuck. 5.0's are nice
sidexwalk 3 years ago 5
AHAHAH omg i think i just blew my ass out i laughed so hard at ur comment !
UndaThaRug 3 years ago 2
sounds like you know what youre talking about.
get the fuck out.
945LSTANG 3 years ago
LOLZ!!what u got?a civic or other shit like that?u are just a jealous ricer
firecat700ts 3 years ago
i personally hate hondas and am also a 5.0 owner, but you have to give the rice car the acceleration advantage over the 5.0, its been recorded by plenty of track members, its not to say they are better just quick, but its just a 50/50 possibility
RancidScorpion 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hate is another type of jealousy my friend. Don't hate us Honda's just because you only see our rear bumpers all the time. Also not all Honda are Rice, it's just that MOST (not are ricers) teenagers (or some stupid person) get Honda's from their parents because they are reliable cars and then they ruin them with stickers, huge body kits and the giant PepBoys wing. But most Honda's are actually well tuned cars, which apparently you cant keep up with despite being a V8 and us a 4cyl :).
MrPreludeTurbo 2 years ago
First off no its not jelousy, you have that confused with people who enter areas that carry items they loath, and try to run there mouth, Two I am not your friend... and I'venever been left by a honda, hell nissans have giving me a hell of a run but Honda? just trash a step behind always a step behind that VVT system they carry is a nissan setup under a different name
KokaKolaKills 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Vtec was the first type of variable valve timing that executed the cams...nissan and toyota later copied or did it in their own method with their systems (MIVEC, VVT, and nissan's system whose name I don't remember but the redesigned it with the new VQ37 engine, the one in 370z and G37's)... second I was only here because a friend of mine has one of these and he wanted to know how much they run without paying $50 for a dyno...last, the only nissan STOCK faster than Honda is the Z thats about it.
MrPreludeTurbo 2 years ago
You own a turboed honda that doesn't make as much to the wheels as a stock LS1 f-body...
Apathy308 2 years ago
well said
warwickshovel 2 years ago
MrPreludeTurbo is a cunt. hondas are decent, but nuthin beats a 5.0. the sound, and its rwd
rsr530 2 years ago 7
lol. Hp per dollar nothing beats a fox mustang. Have fun trying to get horsepower with your civic, crx, blah blah blah at a reasonable price. Trust me, 7k down the drain in a turbo Integra that only makes 275whp? Get the hell outta here or come over to the good side my friend.
rideyellow 2 years ago 2
I always LAUGH at how STUPID The Toyota advertisers are when they make Lexus commercials! How come when you watch a LEXUS car commercial, something that's built by Asains, you always have a European sounding annoncer in ALL of the videos??? Makes me think they are selling over priced cars to the WEAK minded?
paysonbadboy 3 years ago 2
Great Mustang. I would like to see the dyno results!
CDNHottie69 3 years ago
lexus??lol, lexus are for gay people.
Boss5point0 3 years ago 4
so not true.
I drive a 94 LS400.
That is a fast car and is pretty bad ass...but i would much rather have a pony.
Miller21 3 years ago
so get a 5.0 and run that car on E85
Hellaciousoutlaw 3 years ago
haha ok so if mustangs are so great, and the ford engine is so good explain this, the new Lexus IS-F makes 415HP and over 350 lb-f of torque, and is a 5.0, also that car is heavier, and is still faster, and does over 30 mpg on the highway, and almost 30 in town. thats why japanese cars are much better than this shitty american trash
richard2201 3 years ago
.... have fun paying for replacements parts on ur pos lexus when u fuck something up since you wotn be able to fidn the parts any where, i hope u got a real deep pocket
steacy91 3 years ago
Yeah you're also comparing a 5.0L from the time of the 80s to a car of today. Besides that year mustang is a excellent platform to build off of because it is cheap, there are several parts for it and wether you have the 2.3 or 5.0 doesn't matter because they are both VERY buildabe. For under 3K you can build a 5.0 to do 12.2 in a 1/4. Your not going to get a lexus to do that for under 10K considering to get the car itself, is over 10K
kingcobra101z 3 years ago
the brand new mustangs still have really poor power.... especially for the size of the engine... and lexus's are very reliable and dont break down... i have an old 93 LS400, and its got 600,000 km's and ive never had to replace anything, my parents freind drove it from new and he only did the basic things, timing belt, etc. they last forever.
richard2201 3 years ago
What are you smoking? The new mustangs are faster than the old ones. It took ford a 429 to get 13s in a 1/4 where as today they can get it with a 4.6L The new 4.6LSOHC is making 300HP that is alot off of a SOHC when Ford's old DOHC 4.6L was making 305. Only if they redesigned the old DOHC. The engine in my mustang is over 19 years old and has had over 260,000 miles on it and it had a shot crank, cam, pistons, bearings, ect. and it still ran! Even broken a Ford will still run.
kingcobra101z 3 years ago 6
Dont break down? any car will break down. it is all how you take care of it. thats only 375000 miles. impressive, but not unheard of. my dad had a 97 F150 that he ran mobil 1 full synthetic in. at 312000 miles he took it for emissions testing and it came out like burning right out of the factory.
fullthrotle2007 3 years ago 3
i used to have a 1988 chevy 1 ton pickup that sat for 5 years with over 500,000 miles on it and it still ran like bran new
Americanmusclefan 3 years ago 2
Sweet ride. I myself love AODs. I live in the city. Hate pedal and clutch on steep hills. The stock AOD is not strong but once they are built right, they can go over 100k even with hard driving and shifting.
steveso007 4 years ago
plus with a shift kit, they rule on the street. no missed shifts, and you dont have to worry about tearing up clutches.
epidemic922 3 years ago
how much hp and torque did it make
Billy53124 4 years ago
thanks man, i found a very clean 89 5.0 completely stock w/ 62,000 miles for 6,000 im definitly thinkin about purchasing it this weekend, what do u think?
hockeydude202 4 years ago 3
i own an 04 cobra a 99cobra and an 04GT and im definitly looking to add a 5.0 to the stable, but ive only drivin stock 5.0's how are they once u do a few bolt on's
hockeydude202 4 years ago
they really seem to resond well. heads cam intake and gears will wake up a five-oh. they're pretty light and handle well. you'd definatly not regret it, a bit cheaper than your cobras too :P
defw1sh 4 years ago
Todays engines are rated way above the normal driving range. I would rather have a 325hp 400 lbs tq at 3500 rpm than a 400hp 325 tq at 5500 rpm engine. Older engines were made for torque. 302 were quite torquey and that's the fun.
tamapalagi 4 years ago 2
there will always be a faster car not everbody can afford a corvete
skid006 4 years ago
That is a beautiful Mustang dude. Looks mint. My Mark VII has a few little mods to it with the same 5.0 302 c.i. I plan to put a video up some day.
CHRIS454 4 years ago
You can take a stock 87-93 5.0 add a cheap used turbo kit for around 1500 and beat damn near any car on the street today...Name any other car out there that comes anywhere remotely close to a 5.0 mod for mod...NOTHING
steeda1984 4 years ago 2
i agrree
CALIRACER69 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
but stangs look old and gay
zapaados 4 years ago
like your mom
befer2 4 years ago 2
lmao nice
zapaados 4 years ago
uhmm.. im sorry, i own a mustang but i know this statement is false. you could easily take a LS1 powered car, throw a turbo on it and make well over what a 5.0 will make. stock bottom end 5.0 motors start tearing themselves apart after 500HP,where as ive seen stock bottom end LS1's pushing 650+ ... but anyway, nice fox. what numbers did you get and whats done to it?
1Fast88Z28 4 years ago
this is true. but there are a bunch of block options for the windsor engines now so 500+ is no sweat. with money and time anything can be fast, just depends on what you like.
defw1sh 4 years ago
5.0 mustangs were a bolt on paradise. There comes a point where you start hurting parts. You can't lean on them too much.
tamapalagi 4 years ago
Yea the fox mustang are light they are cheep to mod. 1k you can have 400 RWHP in a 5.0
foxstang92 4 years ago
I have a '95 5.0, how can you go from 215hp to 400hp for $1000?
darkuk89 4 years ago
turbo
humantestdummy 4 years ago
the only way I think of going 400hp with one 1k is buying used parts and doing all the machining and port jobs at home.
93SuperChargedStang 4 years ago
ok you guys dont understand.... yes a 5.0 doesnt have alot of hp but al you young guys think all you need to go fast is hp...they have like 300 torque and plus i used to build civics and v6s ...this mustang can have 600 hp with 2000 bucks remember
xmarleyx06 4 years ago
lmao mustangs suck balls!! they get like 200hp from a 5.0 engine... that is bad, a 2.0 honda civic would smoke that thing
richardfourtwenty 4 years ago
215*
darkuk89 4 years ago
LOL. Dont forget a little thing called Torque! 5.0 250-300lbs Torque. Civic 120lbs. LOL. you still lose! HP don't mean shit unless you can put it on the ground!
5.0>civic
V irtually
T orqueless
E conomic
C ar!
LOL!
93SuperChargedStang 4 years ago
mustangs kick ass you retard. how about me and my dad take out our 89 stang and race your little honda civic, we'll see who wins.
mustangman1233 3 years ago
i'll race ya in my civic
bign280 3 years ago
love the fact that a my v6 has almost the same hp as a 90 GT, stock 215hp aint much...
232mustang232 4 years ago
yea but the 87-93 are way faster than the 05 v6 models....trust me i own the 88 and my sis got the 05 v6...my car is bone stock and will SMOKE the new one
47glavine 4 years ago
u will smoke the new one? or have u even tried cuz the 99-04 have 190, thats a big jump from the 94-98 which only had 145, plus the newer v6's have more hp then that...even if u beat that..it would be by a hair. the only thing u might by is ur acceleration...u might have some type of posi, or a locker..whereas the newers v6's one wheel peel around. Not dissing the older GT's or anything im just saying it should be more for a v8. I own a 99 3.8 and i'd give u a run for ur money ;)
232mustang232 4 years ago
i've never seen a 3.8 smoke a 5.0,never!
firecat700ts 4 years ago 2
I have, but they were built motors.
kingcobra101z 3 years ago
LOL. don't forget that the 05's and up stangs are fucking tanks. LOL. Plus they have OB3 technology for better performance and emissions. Dont try to compare HP from two way different gen. mustangs!
93SuperChargedStang 4 years ago
that thing sounds great what does it have for exhaust
j013456789 4 years ago
i own a 91 Gt exactly like this one, bone stock, but she rips pretty good. 5.0's are unreal!!
012Zapper012 4 years ago
This car, like my 89, is a GT. The SVT Cobra had a different rear bumper cover, wing, tail lights, nose, ground effects, and wheels, along with numerous engine changes. It also had LX tailpipes that were visible, unlike the GT.
As far as the differences between the GT and LX, the GT was just a body kit added to an LX hatch. It also came standard with a sport interior. They're the exact same car under the skin.
69HemiGTX 4 years ago
Did they have Cobras in 89?
Shintsu2 4 years ago
Man theyve had snakes for BILLIONS of years. check it.
This mustang looks much better than the latest ones.
Energonorama 4 years ago
not in 89
zhssoccer7 4 years ago
I meant the wriggly ones.
Energonorama 4 years ago
Technically, yes, but not in the US, and they were nothing like the SVT Cobra. From 84-92, every Canadian GT was officially known as a Mustang Cobra GT. The 93 GTs sold in the Great White North dropped the Cobra designation to avoid confusion concerning the SVT Cobra, even though it wasn't sold up there. For the US market, the only Cobras were the 79-81 and 93 models.
69HemiGTX 4 years ago
Nope. The cobra IIs started in the mid 70s I believe 76, the last year for cobra was 81 and was brought back in 93, and then ended 04.
kingcobra101z 3 years ago
sad isnt it. the cobra's were definitly some of the best mustangs out there. i dont consider gt500's mustangs either. I liked the boss's they had in the 90's shame they took those away too.
Fubar231 3 years ago
Not really, ford ditched the cobra for the new GT500 which this year is suppose to get 540HP to 600HP if you get the super snake, and ford is likely to bring some of the old mustangs back. There are rumors that the boss is coming back, and that in 09 ford is going to make several small and big engines optional all the way from 3.5L V6 to 5.8L V8
kingcobra101z 3 years ago
the stock mustang gt or lx came with 225 horse until 1993 it had like 215
badcolt944 4 years ago
205....
zhssoccer7 4 years ago
whats the difference between a gt mustang and a reg mustang? I know that it has a body kit. A nything else?
pergrinefalcon 4 years ago
this stang is clean......what kind of horsepower did they get out of it though.
rcmaster1987 4 years ago
how much was this car?
eclipsegsx765 4 years ago
That car is B-E-A-UTIFUL
5.0s own=)
jackass734 4 years ago
sounds great my dad had an 89 gt 5.0 I still can't believe he sold it.
ThatGuyfromCCHS08 4 years ago
just get some longtubes wit a electric cutout wat some people dnt understand is when the car came out it had 180hp but its still a good engine just put some bolt ons a cam wit some spray u will be kicking ass.
THATNI99AJOHN 4 years ago
my 93 gt is dynoed at 265 with just a cold air intake, distributer cap and spark plug wires. before that it was at 245 stock.
bluegtmustang50 4 years ago
I think this one is SVT, maybe GT. Back end looks either one, what say you? I really love 3-Gen 302 Mustangs, better than ones came after 1994.
azzaQ 4 years ago
kaç km yani:d what numbers did it put up?( for km )
rapelatilim 4 years ago
hey, 205 and 263 are actually really really good numbers for a stock auto 5.0, damn nice car man! get some vids up when you get the other stuff in!
Stanghole281 4 years ago
thanks brotha!
It's taking some time, but I'm building up funds and buying car parts as steady as I can. It will be night and day once I put all the aftermarket bits on her.
Wutang21 4 years ago
I got a weird vibration in my tri-ax short shift, vibrates really bad at rpms over 3k. deffintly annoying right? lol...When you get the next dyno done though, be sure to put up a video.
Stang50s 4 years ago
Oh yah, it's annoying. i hope I find that problem soon. She want's to go fast, but can't because I don't want to break anything else. :)
Most definitly will put a new video up when I get it done.
Wutang21 4 years ago
Damn 205 thats it? was expecting alittle more
Stang50s 4 years ago
Yup, I was hoping for a lot more. But it's bone stock, almost at 90,000miles on the odo at the time of that video and the AOD in her was slipping.
i have an e303, springs, and lifters waiting to go in but I'm having some unknown vibration in the driveline that I need to find and fix first. So i'm just waiting for money and time. She'll get there.
Wutang21 4 years ago
so what numbers did it put up?
Stang50s 4 years ago
She pulled only 204 rwhp/ 263 torque.
She's 5spd now and I'd like to get a new set of numbers soon. Just been way to busy.
Wutang21 4 years ago