One mans Terrorist is another mans freedom fighter. As THE PEOPLE (world) we need to realise that it's our freedom at stake whichever side wins. 70 years ago we had a World War to stop Hitler who we were told would enforce his Big Brother-esque doctrine on us.. yet we live in a society where Blonde, Tall, Beautiful is the basis for being successful. Where we have constant cameras watching all of us from the fear of the shadows attacking us. We're being forced to live in fear of each other!
A wealth of criticisms, without any alternative for defending the people against an extremist network like Fundamentalist Islamic Terrorism that HIDES AMONG OUR CITIZENS & plans our death. How can we protect ourselves without intelligence on people living in our country? What alternative way can you propose for gathering intelligence to prevent another handful of people from easily killing 3000 casualties? When you criticize one policy, offer an alternative. Otherwise what's the point?
I have many, many other videos whitch offer many solutions, but not a disriminatory one that you seek. You wish to oppress others out of fear and paranoia without any regard to the facts or the circumstances. If the U.S. would stop trying to police and control the world, the people in it wouldn't try to "plans our death".
How would you feel if say, China, had a few dozen military bases in the US?
i've actually lived in the uk for over 5 years now. it's pretty scary - there really are cameras everywhere. this is a great film, but i feel it lionizes churchill a bit much - this is the chap who said about the kurds, "i am strongly in favour of using poisoned gases against uncivilized tribes to spread a lively terror... against recalcitrant arabs as an experiment." he also called gandhi a seditious, half-naked troublemaker...
which they are not. There is no such thing as a peacefull revolution. Even Gandhi had the benefit of a violent revolutionary group, to which he was the establishment's choice alternative.
Listen kid, not all effects are violent. If my speech influences other people so as much as that they change their behavior, then it is powerful enough. And if I can make political change, then it is revolutionary. It is just naive to ramble on about one orthodox way of doing revolution by force on the street. People make politics, violence does not make anything but violent people and angry victims.
Thank you for assuming my age. Incedentally, i am legally an adult. I also only advocate violence to protect from violence, with peace as the thing to work twords, as did Malcom X. I said nothing of orthodoxy, only stating the fact of nonviolent revolution as yet being nonexistent.
You have no such right. You will leave and lose some kudos in the process, which you deserve. Or you can accept my opinions about you calling me a tool and violent raving on the street in the name of political justice.
The majority of 'Fundamentalist Islamic Terrorists' are funded by and/or trained by the CIA or MI6.
jimlad316 3 years ago
How would you know that??
schp16 3 years ago
One mans Terrorist is another mans freedom fighter. As THE PEOPLE (world) we need to realise that it's our freedom at stake whichever side wins. 70 years ago we had a World War to stop Hitler who we were told would enforce his Big Brother-esque doctrine on us.. yet we live in a society where Blonde, Tall, Beautiful is the basis for being successful. Where we have constant cameras watching all of us from the fear of the shadows attacking us. We're being forced to live in fear of each other!
intothetreebob 3 years ago
A wealth of criticisms, without any alternative for defending the people against an extremist network like Fundamentalist Islamic Terrorism that HIDES AMONG OUR CITIZENS & plans our death. How can we protect ourselves without intelligence on people living in our country? What alternative way can you propose for gathering intelligence to prevent another handful of people from easily killing 3000 casualties? When you criticize one policy, offer an alternative. Otherwise what's the point?
truthadvocate 3 years ago
I have many, many other videos whitch offer many solutions, but not a disriminatory one that you seek. You wish to oppress others out of fear and paranoia without any regard to the facts or the circumstances. If the U.S. would stop trying to police and control the world, the people in it wouldn't try to "plans our death".
How would you feel if say, China, had a few dozen military bases in the US?
Darganot 3 years ago
It appears that War indeed is the health of the state.
MatthewLeee 3 years ago
i've actually lived in the uk for over 5 years now. it's pretty scary - there really are cameras everywhere. this is a great film, but i feel it lionizes churchill a bit much - this is the chap who said about the kurds, "i am strongly in favour of using poisoned gases against uncivilized tribes to spread a lively terror... against recalcitrant arabs as an experiment." he also called gandhi a seditious, half-naked troublemaker...
toesandumbrellas 3 years ago
Good critisism but failed context in braking things and orders. Change is only possible with good peaceful arguments.
teemuruskeepaa 4 years ago
teemuruskeepaa, youre a tool.
sacredthornapple 3 years ago
Not if my arguments are revolutionary.
teemuruskeepaa 3 years ago
which they are not. There is no such thing as a peacefull revolution. Even Gandhi had the benefit of a violent revolutionary group, to which he was the establishment's choice alternative.
sacredthornapple 3 years ago
Listen kid, not all effects are violent. If my speech influences other people so as much as that they change their behavior, then it is powerful enough. And if I can make political change, then it is revolutionary. It is just naive to ramble on about one orthodox way of doing revolution by force on the street. People make politics, violence does not make anything but violent people and angry victims.
teemuruskeepaa 3 years ago
Thank you for assuming my age. Incedentally, i am legally an adult. I also only advocate violence to protect from violence, with peace as the thing to work twords, as did Malcom X. I said nothing of orthodoxy, only stating the fact of nonviolent revolution as yet being nonexistent.
sacredthornapple 3 years ago
Yet all the violent revolutions have failed to end class stratification and political hegemony.
teemuruskeepaa 3 years ago
This is an endless argument. Thus, I will disprove the last sentence by ending it now.
sacredthornapple 3 years ago
That is selfish and hegemonic denial of other people's wishes. You can't have power with those kinds of views.
teemuruskeepaa 3 years ago
I dont want power. I want power to leave me the fuc alone. I want you to leave this argument now.
sacredthornapple 3 years ago
You have no such right. You will leave and lose some kudos in the process, which you deserve. Or you can accept my opinions about you calling me a tool and violent raving on the street in the name of political justice.
teemuruskeepaa 3 years ago
Bullseye!!!
Scrapheap71 4 years ago
Excellent video.
darkstar1one 4 years ago
Awesome! I wish I could give it 10 stars!
Brimax 4 years ago
great video well done
ghost74surfer 4 years ago