oh by the way have a look at the steel colum that turns to dust right in front of the camera, no kidding just type it in. what makes steel turn to dust read the book pls
I afraid it wasn't explosives have a read of dr judy wood where did the towers go its one of the most informative and logical explan ations i have read, it also debunks explosives read it first then say no way later
4:07 … that "other" force is called the rest of the building. explosive would have exerted uneven pressure on the facade sending it tumbling, the top rotating faster than the bottom, so that the piece would make contact with the ground parallel to the surface.
2:04 the facade separated partially, thats why it appears lower, the debris mass is still over 10 floors above piling up onto the core, you can see the upper portion of the facarde falling in the 3 seconds after 2:04
for one, the official report did not say the core was weakened, it said that the fireproofing was mostly blasted off int he explosion and during impact. The trussed supporting the floors weakened…
@5cbb9 i love how anyone who disagrees with people who think critically about the most important event of the early 21st century need only name-call and make disparaging insults to gain instant crediblility,....
Hence why people hate Obama more than ever now that he announced that the troops are coming back home, maybe because he has balls to say "Enough" to a waste of money and lives and lies in these wars.
So sick of hearing about the towers 'pancaking'. What building has ever done that? It's not a real thing, it's just put out there as an ironclad theory that automatically has credit. If there was 'pancaking' you would see visual resistance and the collapse would slowwww down. It would not accelerate. Also, the top on both towers lean in the beginning, meaning only one side was collapsing, why would the other side suddenly push down with equal force and 'pancake' the floors? Preposterous.
@Hotters70603XL Dude, go away. 707s and 767s are very, very different. And if fires didn't exist past the impact point, then why were there people in the lobby that got burned on 80% of their body by flames shooting out of the elevator shafts. The fires weren't meant to melt steel; just weaken it. Half the stuff you question can be explained by common sense. You guys are disrespecting all of the families and victims of this horrible event.
@Hotters70603XL Steel weaken when hot losing 50% of it's strength at temperature at cold as 800 kelvin. A three times this weaken structure can fall, the Titanic can sink. Metal flying at near 600mph breaking support beams, fuel explosion, then a fire weakening the steel. However I already know you are too stupid and delusional to understand any of this. I'm only saying this so intelligent people can laugh at your stupidity.
You guys have to be kidding me.The explosions are explained by the fact that all the floors collapsing pushed an immense amount of air, with nowhere to go. It blew out windows. Same with the initial impact of the plane. When the plane hit, it cause a gargantuan explosion, sending flames and jet fuel spewing down the elevator shafts, sending flames and fuel throughout the whole building and weakening the integrity of the whole building. C'mon.Do your research before telling others to do the same.
This video is "joke science". Perhaps the author of this nonsense would like to explain how explosive charges survived 800 + degree flames for 1 hour and 41 minutes? Anyone who believes this video is beyond stupid and gullible as hell.
@BladeJones Don't forget, the charges were throughout the entire buildings, fired below and above impact zones. What caused the utter disintegration of the tops of the towers, especially the south tower? Where were the platforms (steel and cement) of the floors? Cement breaking down is one thing, but the "trays" that it was poured into were steel. How did they turn to powder? I saw and touched this residue myself. The cross support beams? All of them? Nahh...
@frankbateau1 What causes disintegration of rocks when huge chucks break off and fall in Yosemite? When things fall from great heights they break apart and get pulverized. It's called kinetic energy. Google it. Anyone who can't see the simple cause and effect of the planes causing these towers to fall needs to stop watching Hollywood movies.
I hear you. I mentioned the cement. This does not explain the disintegreation of solid steel. Drop a large 4 inch thick x 30 foot long steel beam from 1000 feet and see if it reduces to it's primal elements. Please re-read my comment. The floors were not just big slabs of concrete. In huge rockfalls, the rocks do not completly reduce to powder, they break into various sizes, some sand may form, but baby powder? The trays? Nahh..
@frankbateau1 Steel was not reduced to powder. LOL. Anyone who says is was is just plain off in another universe. Some 185,101 tons of structural steel were hauled away from ground zero. The bulk of the steel was shipped to China and India. The Chinese firm Baosteel purchased 50,000 tons at a rate of $120 per ton.
@YourInvestmentAdvise NO we are not in outer space. You have made a very important and insightful and truthful statement. Thank you! Seriously. I have no problem adjusting my opinions or course, I am asking questions. No matter what site you visit, there is confusion pain, etc etc about 9/11. I am glad we can still discuss this on Youtube. We need to take it higher. My position is, simply that. It does not all add up. Something is amiss. Victims are still passing away. :(
one other thing, the terrorists planted bombs in there before hoping it would crash as planned, but it was a failure. do you not realized they could have planted them too... dont blame others for the past. this is this countries greatest flaw, not letting go of the freaking past. get over. celebrate the lives lost, not blame the government. or else we will never move on and just honor those in this tragady... DX
God! do you not see that the angle of the tower and how they crashed into it was like cutting a tree down. the wind above probably knocked it over but we all blame the government for this one. but why would the government do this? to get money? well you wouldnt get much and if you did it would probably raise debt... -.-
God! do you not see that the angle of the tower and how they crashed into it was like cutting a tree down. the wind above probably knocked it over but we all blame the government for this one. but why would the government do this? to get money? well you wouldnt get much and if you did it would probably raise debt... -.-
God! do you not see that the angle of the tower and how they crashed into it was like cutting a tree down. the wind above probably knocked it over but we all blame the government for this one. but why would the government do this? to get money? well you wouldnt get much and if you did it would probably raise debt... -.-
your points are invalid, it wasn't at free fall speed, the "explosives" is obviously a downdraft of air and smoke coming out of the windows from the massive collapsing building
@luvsrq It is BEYOND obvious. Soo many people are too stupid to complete high school. They blame the world for their stupidity and failures, they muck up jury pools, post moronic videos on YouTube, etc.
i dont see explosions.....oh wait! wait!...no, still no explosives. its quit obvious that this we clearly planned though, i mean the media clearly points out those involved:
bush
yogi bear
britney spears
justin timberlake
heath ledger
its clear that they did the 911 attacks...i mean, its common sense people!
oh yeah, the 343 firefighters voluntarily allowed themselves to die too in order to try to cover up this obvious inside job.
your all crazy the building collapsed by the jet feul its not a conspiracy trust all thses fucking anti amrican government retards to start making shit up the building collapsed and killed many people instead of doin bullshit videos like this people should be paying respect to all those who died or lost a loved one
Although conspiratorilism is tempting considering the magnitude of events, I have been looking at videos, news stories and even conspiracy videos, and from this it is clear that what happened on 9/11 was a terrible act of terrorism and people trying to find answers in the small mysteries, are clinging on to false hope
ZioNazis could make the Havaara agreement with Hitler, the Bank of International Settlements with many Jews working there could finance the Third Reich. The Zionazis could give a dam about 6 million common Jews and 3 million Polish Christians. Operation Susannah, USS Liberty attack, They own the news media, Hollywood, Obama, Boener and the Supreme Court. Of course ZioNazis could pull off 9/11 and get away with it. All debunkers that troll here are stupid bought off goy chattel.
any child can see there is a great deal more than a simple collapse. there are many who have a lot riding on maintaining their own ignorance. they insult because they are insecure and afraid of others saying the obvious. if this wasn't terrorism than i gave up my son for a lie. i voted for a murderer or maybe more than one murderer. that hurts people enough to make them desperate to not understand that we were taken for a ride that continues even today. we will not win even if everyone knows
Force2: Do a little reading on dynamic vs static loading, fluid dynamics and pneumatics. Remember grade school math?
The structure was designed to carry a static load, the 25 stories above impact. Pretend instead, that you were on the 93rd floor and I placed a 50lb dumbbell on your foot. Nothing, right?
Now instead, I drop the 50 pound weight on your foot from the 94th floor. Emergency room, right? Force = mass x velocity.
Your 'explosions' are pneumatic blowouts of windows.
@fascistcat Yeah, I'm not yet convinced it was charges either, though there are arguments against it being just air too, like why all the "dust" when the blowouts are 20-stories below the collapsing front, although the leading edge of a 100-ft of beam punching through the ceiling would make that amt. of dust. What I DO find troubling however is WTC 7 which is OBVIOUSLY a controlled demolition.. As well as how quickly all the steel was shipped off to China. You'd think it would B studied.
Force: I actually thought that you were going to quantify the force that WAS necessary to pancake the floors (1:25), but I should have known better when you used the word "weight."
At 3:54 you say, "where is the weight and force needed to..?" OK, I'll play 'Who's Smarter than a Fifth Grader?' What is the force needed? You are claiming that there was insufficient force without telling us how much force would be needed or how much is evident.
Ask yourself..Why are they banning the first responders from the 10 yr anniversary? Maybe their upset they were told the air was safe, all got sick, denied coverage, 10 yrs later get it if their screened through a terror watch list. Bush & Obama will be there claiming to be hero's when the real hero's aren't permitted? This is not a conspiracy theory just the cold truth about 9/11 that continues to sicken me. I know I'll be there in 16 days paying tribute to the real hero's.
I love how you play such beautiful music to such an amazing loss of life you inconsiderate prick. Did you fail @ Georgia Tech or MIT. Force coming down a stairwell or elevator shaft could produce windows and sections of building to blow out . Go back to playing Warcraft in your Mom's basement.
If as the "experts" say it was a "pancake collapse", then please explain to me and the rest of the intelligent free world, WHERE are the 47 MASSIVE core columns? The should have been sticking straight up like a wedding night cock. But they were'nt. Can you explain THAT in the tired old pancake theory? I didnt think so. They were cut with cutting charges and brought down with the rest of the building. God what a travesty the whole thing was/is.
@orangevalesweetpea Pay attention. Notice that you see stuff leaning over after the colklapse wave passes? The dust is hiding the breakup of the core. It is taking a pounding from the floor slabs beating against it. It wasn't meant to stand alone.You are an idiot. There is not sign of any cutting torch use until late in the cleanup. That's how they had to remove the stubs of the columns. Learn some basic research skills, you nattering moron.
What actually happened was that at the tilting of the top when the south tower collapsed. If you look right where the plane hit when the south tower begins to collapse. It sorta collapses inwards, causing shockwaves to go to the other side of the south tower. At some point, since the top part and the bottom parts of the south tower collided, those shockwaves pulled alart the top half, but all that weight continued the collapse of the south tower. A global shockwave weakened the whole structure.
If you don't like America's government, why don't you leave? Because we don't want dumb fucks like you blaming the bloodiest day in the United States since Antietam on the government.
@kirstinxxcouture well then the tea baggers should get the hell out, and the right to lifers, and anyone who don't like the way america is run, right asshole??
@orangevalesweetpea nope. your ignorance is so ridiculous for there is no proof of controlled demolition and there would be no need for it from the intense fires and structural damage.
@fillyferz Stop thinking with your balls, twooftard. Even if they were meant for mental work, it would still leave you in the developmentally challenged group.
@nuclearfallout217 Go ahead and keep up your trying to kill free speech about 9/11 dipwad. You're going to wind up certifying your right to gurgle with a ball strapped in your mouth chained to a wall before you march your way into a death chamber, your final steps made in leg chains. If you don't want to hear about 9/11, because what people say about 9/11 upsets you, then don't browse effen webpages of 9/11 videos you effen moron.
@nukefallou You need to look up conspiracy. It does not pertain specifically to any type of crime apart from a crime that is committed by multiple parties who communicate in planning said crime. You're the idiot. Why did you mention your dad if he's not who you know that died on 9/11. Maybe you do know someone who died on 9/11. You're a disgrace to their memory out here on the internet trying to kill free speech about 9/11 with your petty guilt trip. You're a hugely asinine offense to humanity.
@nuclearfallout217 You're the a$s#ole, trying to guilt people away from discussing 9/11 with bogus stories of your dead dad you effen monster lieing a$s B*tch! The government DOES absolutely claim it was a conspiracy of Muslim men from Saudi Arabia primarily, all men of military age. Conspiratorial crime means only that multiple parties to the crime communicated in planning the crime. You're not only a complete a hole you're also a total moron. Good bye.
The only thing missing to supply the extra force was Godzilla's foot. It was nothing else BUT a controlled demolition. The best to date and a future combat systems test. Welcome to the Matrix.
@nuclearfallout217 If you believe the government story, it was a conspiracy. The government claims it was a conspiracy of Saudi Agents, mostly upper middle class Saudi guys of military age. You're the disgrace and a traitorous treasonous dush b, selling government propaganda trying to present yourself as a victim of 9/11.
THINGS FALL AT AN ACCELERATING SPEED OF 9.82 M/S^2! DID YOU NOT TAKE HIGH SCHOOL PHYSICS? THE TIME IT TOOK TO FALL IS NOT THE SAME AS THE ACCELERATION OF WHICH IT FELL. EVEN WITH THAT IT TOOK LONGER THAN 9.8 SECONDS, IT TOOK ABOUT 14 OR SOMETHING OF THE SORT. sorry for the caps, i just wanted people to see it. haha
I am not sure on the north and south tower, but building 7 was a demo......This whole 911 was an inside job to get all of this new national security shit started..Now look at it, after 911 you cannot hardly travel without TSA or some other asshole with a badge drilling you about where, when and why in your life...You are a terrorist until you can prove otherwise...Fuck the NWO....
@avionicswirenut Security was stood down at the WTC over a whole weekend, in the weeks before 9/11. That was meal worm Silverstein's opportunity to have the demolition work done on his newly leased and hugely insured towers. The tower collapse was an insurance scam too. Silverstein had only put up a couple million to lease the towers, which began just that summer and he took out insurance that paid off 8 BILLION if I recall correctly.
@danielvincentkelley Polititions were told not to fly on that day...The evidence goes on and on...The fucking writing is on the wall and most Americans cannot read it.....And now we in another fucking war....Impeach Obama....
@avionicswirenut The bulk of the purpose of demolishing the towers, was to kill the firefighters. To kill some office workers at the WTC and some travelers on holiday, isn't quite the psychological jolt the American people needed to go spend trillions of dollars stealing oil from the people of Iraq and enforce a cheap oil pipeline on the people of Afghanistan and weaken the US military, 40,000 disabled by the Iraq war, that the US fall easier prey to what's next, nuke terror, then nuke war.
@avionicswirenut So that was the purpose AND the effect of demolishing the towers, the first responders, some police and bunches of firemen, were murdered while the building was pulverized. The effect on the US psyche, bunch of flag waving war seeking war getting simpletons was carried off without a hitch. Evidence that the buildings were demolished is abundant. Free fall speed, steel not melting at jet fuel fire temperatures, thermate in the dust, whole building powderized, thermite burnt steel
The puddle of fire under "the pile" burnt for MONTHS. That the government is murderous enough to do it, demolish the buildings is made clear by their sending people to work "the pile" which was asbestos, mercury lightbulbs, all kinds of toxic building materials melting into a puddle of thermate, which is a material that burns hot enough to melt steel. So, with all that in the air and the air quality assessment showing very bad air, they sent those guys to work in the mess no respirators.
Bush's father was the president of the CIA. Somehow that connects. I really want to see who agrees with me. Im not being a thumbs up whore, but if you agree, thubs up! if you disagree thumbs down.
@crashspeed100 G.H.W. Bush Senior quote from when he was the head of the CIA: "The only way to make a Syrian man talk, is to behead his children in front of him."
I think you are wrong, it's not the roof of the building that we can see get out of smoke but the impact zone, look better at the angle of the fall of the roof of the building and the angle of column who get out of smoke, you should see. I think the roof of the building entered inside the building and pushed the zone of impact.
Anyway, this collapse is not normal, inside job.!?
The government had their roll in this, and if you THINK otherwise, then you might have down syndrome =). The true enemy of the US is its Government, I don't understand why this isn't obvious by now. But then again, after having Bush as your president, and seeing how brainless he was, I'm not so surprised anymore.
@RoboBagons dude, just stop talking. what reasoning do you have for the government to do something like this? do yourself a favor and educate yourself to at least a second grade level and stop with the conspiracy bullshit. the reason it isnt obvious is because it aint true. NOBODY FUCKING CARES! if thats what you think then go live in afganistan if this government is so horrible FAG!
@RoboBagons so you are saying that the majority of Americans have down syndrome and this little group of idiot conspiracy theorist have the true meaning to everything? no. you have no proof at all of government involvement in 9/11.
@breadsped98 the initial collapse of WTC 2 progresses as fast as falling debris, how is that possible?, did the intact portion have the resistance of air?
@RoboBagons the U.S. government would not blow up the twin towers and the fucking pentagon to start a war with Al Qaeda, Al Qaeda would do that (go figure). Yeah sure, there are justifiable reasons to not trust the gov't but 9/11 sure isn't one of them. I think you might have down syndrome a bit.
@NamikazeH i think you'll find using "&" instead of "and" isn't 'incorrect', merely unconventional. as for calling me a grammar Nazi, i commented on someone's spelling; grammar has nothing to do with it. so before YOU start having a go at someone for being hypocritical, make sure you get your facts right. :)
Dude!! For one thing one floor is incapable of holding 30 floors that are moving as one unit. That is what the airplane accomplished. It took out the support and flooring across a few floors. Without the floors the ext wall just crumples. What you are seeing toward the end there fall outward is the exterior wall which has had all of its flooring sheered off by the 30 stories collapsing past it. I saw a video specifically on this and it shows that wall tilting out.
Also consider the rubble pile from a 1/4 mile high structure that just pancaked. There would have been girders everywhere. Armor thick steel just pulverized into a fine powder. The strongest buildings in the world free fell in its own footprint in a cloud of micron sized dust in 9 seconds. Molten steel burning in a hole for months. Connect the dots.
@Phygar1 at the bottom where you wouldn't need to put explosives? you think the government would be that dumb about it, there is sufficient evidence linking them too it i beleive, but it's just to hard to really beleive that they could do that
its weird that but i think i might have the answer to the explosions part.Every building in the world needs a heating source but the only way to fuel it is with Oil wich is highly explosive so the collapse could have triggered the explosions.
of course i've heard of them all. they were all indeed terrible, and in terms of numbers dead, you're right. most of these were the orders of one evil ruler - hitler, stalin (purges) etc., or one government being overly aggressive to another country. however i believe 9/11 is worse and indeed the most despicable act committed to mankind because of the way the american government has deceived its own people, and possibly even planned it all. i really hope assange has something on this!
there is no way that a plane flying into such a building could have precipitated such an effect. the building could not collapse at the speed of gravity because of fire damage, no chance on earth. until the truth is uncovered, this will remain the most atrocious and despicable act ever committed to mankind.
@okukok "this will remain the most atrocious and despicable act ever committed to mankind." Hmmm, ever heard of something called the Holocaust? Obviously you weren't around during The Blitz. What about a place called Hiroshima? Nagasaki? Heard of them? What about the firebombings of Dresden and Tokyo? All of these make 9/11 pale in comparison, and all but the first two were committed by AMERICANS.
The why keep looking is the truth is needed. Sure planes hit the towers - but there has been many fires in towers worldwide without any doing a freefall like 3 wtc bldgs.. not to mention why did wtc bld 7 fall straight down? Where was the plane debri at the pentagon? How about the plane that fell in the open field - where was that debri & human remains? For years I thought Alex Jones and 9/11 truthers were nuts.. but after alot of research I question 9/11. Research research research folks.
to all the people out there who keep saying 9-11 was setup and an inside job and for everyone that keeps trying to prove that strange things happened, why? 9-11 happened, there WERE casualites and there is nothing we can do about it now. It is possible for people to edit some of the videos to make it look strange and cause therories. But, its over, people died and proving that there were bombs and other strange things wont help the situation at all. There is nothing we can do
@ilikepieboy10 Why? Because if indeed this was planned in advance - what else has happened in our past - and what is planned for our future? The folks whom lost loved ones deserve the truth. So do the American public. As do folks elsewhere too.
A prelude for attacking Iraq for oil? That would be the crueliest lost of lives if so. Or perhaps a prelude to Patriot Act - which was enhanced by BO. What change's are yet to come?
@ilikepieboy10 I agree, people will always be trying to understand what happened because it was such a horrific event, but whats done is done. Figuring it out HOW the terrorists did it won't change the fact that they killed thousands of people!
After 3+ years of looking at the WTC recently I realized that all the smoke we see is concrete and office contents being pulverized in mid air. the streams of smoke are the floors being powdered in mid air. We can "clearly" see the streams of vaporizing concrete, each 20x60 ft section makes a stream of smoke as it separates from the 47 central backbones., How is Concrete exploded like that? Is the concrete itself is an explosive? Could nanothermite do this It's a proven fact in all dust samples
Keep showing the facts to everyone (in a polite way / don't force a message down someones throat). It is so important that the truth comes out. NewCorp (fox news) and their smaller companies (comcast, etc) are buying every single media outlet they can find - they want only to hypnotize you with lies, to further their agenda.
The upper steel cage that broke away and fell off was much lighter (steel-wise) and flimsier than what was below.. The core columns were tapered with thinner steel and were lighter as you went upwards in both towers.
Another interesting fact is, that every floor in the tower was engineered to hold the weight of the upper structure several times. That steel cage was super strong underneath.
Why did the upper section fall off, blow up in mid air and then collapse every other remaining floor? Impossible.
Go look at this, it shows you that the top did indeed fell forward, and its logical given where to airplane entered.. but i want you guys to take a look at the puffs of smoke, the fact that they are appearing all under the collapsing area is a proof of the pankake theory.
Once something that big is pulled into such gravity mechanism, it takes just an insane resistance which just wasnt there. The top portion fell in a straigth line f or about 30floors.
the top portion was about 45floors tall, and the following 20-30 floors right under it suffered full pressure once it collapsed since as u see on all those tapes, the top portion nearly fell in a straight line for quite a while, once that mechanism is started, the remaining 40-50 floors under are not quite enough to stop it.
The north is clear evidence of that. the top fell in a straight line, and the weight wasnt even as heavy. But once it starts, the collapsing only gets STRONGER, not weaker
Thank you for this video, thank you for taking the time to help all the sheep of this country that are too stupid, fearful, and doubtful to believe what really happened.
Marvin Bush, W.'s brother, worked for Securacom that provided security for WTC, Dulles Airport and United Airlines around 9/11. Then there's the anthrax sent to Democrats and the media. Then you have the insider trading pre 9/11 on put options betting that United and American Airlines stock would drop. Rumsfeld said "Flight 93 was shot down in press conference". The official story is a conspiracy!
@kimslandthegreat yes, actually there were but records all say that bomb sniffing dogs were pulled out of the towers (including building 7) in the the coming days before 9/11 for no apparent reason at all.
Little bit off-topic, but at 2:57, we can very clearly see a massive ejection of dust and debris from the very bottom of the impact zone BEFORE the top section begins to move. How is it that anyone can fervently deny the use of explosives when such video evidence exists?
At first, I was going to say that the way the South Tower collaped was because it was hit at the corner of the building. Of course the corner would be weakened and cause the building to collapse at that angle. But when I saw the rest of the video, you're right! There were small explosions on lower floors as the tower started to fall. If it was just a "physics collapse" as others have thought, only the top of the tower would've fallen and left a huge hole in the remainder of the building.
@VideoMenu Think for yourself and don't instantly accept the official story as the truth and you know that's what he meant you just wanted to be a dick.
What does it mean "Total collapse time was 9.8 seconds. "That's freefall speed in a vacuum."'? and why is the claim about freefall speed in quotes? Did someone else make the mistake and you are using it?
On some things the media wants to normalize the unthinkable where it concerns the vested interests of their owners they like to the impossible probable by authoritarian official's say so & relying on the viewer's ignorance of basic physics to manipulate them. The rest of the world is on to these criminals, the US population is too stupid to get a grasp of what really happened.
@gorf64 Trying to sound clever yourself by debasing the content of my statement. Interesting fallacy. The topic here is about the collapse of the WTC and how it did not get covered. Why not stick to the content rather than the ad hominem attacks. By the way you had nothing to say here on this 9-11 posting as far as I can see so, do you lack anything to to say?
this obviously wasn't just something they done out of the blue, they had planned it carefully and probably over time, and if i'm honest, i believe from research Americans had actually planned this attack, why? well i dont have a fucking clue some people are fucked up simple as..
@MERCURHILLMANIAC And you are a conspiracy whacker. I find that conspiracy bottom feeders get a charge out of the feelings of superiority while calling the rest of us blind and weak. You are a whacker. I'm not feeling terrorized. I feel sorry for the tiny rodents who get their only thrills from imagining conspiracy in events that are truly horrible but of no more significance than that.
Weight IS force times mass. Anything that falls is under the influence of the same force - gravity. Your use of "least" and "most" resistance is completely baffling. Are you saying that without explosives the towers would have collapsed more slowly? Faster? Not at all? And a couple puffs of dust out of a couple windows does not show enough additional force to make an argument either way. Cool music though!
@MERCURHILLMANIAC I see no explosions and see no reason that the top ten floors should have fallen (not "should have fell") into the street. I am not afraid of any truth. The folks who recognize this as an act of terrorism are not a herd of cowering rabbits.
@redtailedboa4 IT wasn't the government dont you get it? It was done by the private companies that own the government / and the buildings. Striping it down why would 3 buildings fall perfectly into a nice neat pile on the ground (one of which had no fire in it) think how much insurance is on those buildings and think of how much money can be made for weapons contractors (if only they had somebody to fight / invade at the time)
@moknowsky Lmfao you are the biggest turd i ever spoke to.. no im actually a balanced minded person (unlike the "American" liberal) however English liberalism is completely different to your insane take on politics in the states. Besides im not a liberal British or otherwise .. however you would know that in the entire history a steel skyscraper has never fallen from fire PERIOD its PLANE science.. fire does not burn evenly and when its suffocated by smoke YOU STINKIN' APE
@moknowsky The dominance of nonsense and lower IQ's exist withing the realm of the Reich wing party! Reich wing nuts have absolutely no knowledge of logic! Jet fuel does not get hot enough to compromise structural quality steel, it's = 2 heating a stainless steel pot on the stove.
@CamosIOI I apologize for offending you then. And I agree, there needs to be answers. But it doesn't seem like it's my responsibility to find them. I will do whatever I can to help others though. Thanks for the video links btw, I will check them out.
A floor in the WTC could handle 1,300t and the tops weighed over 50,000t. A service floor could in no way stop the collapse. On the other hand they had the bottoms of the elevator shafts so any air being pushed in the shafts would escape from those points. The bases of the cores remained intact. There were no strong explosions recorded, none powerful enough to damage the structure.
Exactly how much explosives would be required to create those jets?
an event of this magnitude shouldn't leave structural engineers, government officials, the general public, etc. etc. with so many questions as to what happened. nothing is in the open. we know the govt story is a lie. let's overthrow.
A message to all out there who are watching this video in their attempt to seek the truth. You need to ask yourself a simple question.
What kind of people watch and then make comments on a video like this? Answer - those who are seeking the truth and those that are being paid to promote the lie.
Be wary of those who spend a lot of time on here both attacking and defending the "official" story. Its far from normal behavior.
Here's something else to think about: The two towers fall at the same rate, even though WTC1 has a larger proportion of the building falling through fewer undamaged floors.
@6687Jason not if there are obstructions. if i fall from the top of a tree, i'm going to fall slower than if i jump off a building. i'll hit lots of branches on the way down. now, if someone were to remove or cut those branches as i fell, or, say, all the steel between floor 110 and the ground, then i, or, say, the building, would fall much faster. which is what happened. the steel in the building was prepared for demoliton.
@6687Jason not if there are obstructions. if i fall from the top of a tree, i'm going to fall slower than if i jump off a building. i'll hit lots of branches on the way down. now, if someone were to remove or cut those branches as i fell, or, say, all the steel between floor 110 and the ground, then i, or, say, the building, would fall much faster. which is what happened. the steel in the building was prepared for demoliton.
I agree, the concrete wouldnt be pulverized to microscopic dust from a "pancake collapse" this is implausible. Where there is an action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Where was the resistance from the building when the plane impacted ? Aluminum doesnt destroy steel, the plane did not decelerate as it hit the tower. The building did not decelerate as it encountered resistance during the collapse as would be expected, there was little resistance, pancaking is an impossible explanation.
There was a video somewhere on youtube that had some clips off of news stations saying that they heard small explosions at the base of one of the towers (in the video, you can hear them too).
I understand your theory and it appreciate the work that it took to arrange this, but i doubt they would have put explosives inside because there would be no point in doing so. Also [as Jason said] somebody would have noticed. Also, the momentum from the collapsing top part (regardless of whether it fell to the side) would have still pushed into the lower floors, and thus continuing the collapse.
If there were explosives don't you think someone would have noticed people planting them? It would have taken weeks if not months to prep. a building for demolition. Where was the detonation cord at? Don't you think it would have been seen? When a building is brought down, the inside is almost completely gutted out first and load bearing walls are weakened. Nobody is going to bring a building of that size straight down without doing all of that, which would have been seen by at least 100 people!
@katlovesall ok but there would still need to be lots in place and someone would have seen. just trying to make a point. just going on what i know as a material engineer.
powerdowns the weekend before..said they were installing new internet cords and computer wires throughout whole buildings..all power was down during that time including cameras and the electronic office doors...look it up
reading comments from posters read up on the hutchinson effect that will explain steel melting and turning to dust
melonman2000 1 month ago in playlist More videos from bobbbennett
oh by the way have a look at the steel colum that turns to dust right in front of the camera, no kidding just type it in. what makes steel turn to dust read the book pls
melonman2000 1 month ago in playlist More videos from bobbbennett
I afraid it wasn't explosives have a read of dr judy wood where did the towers go its one of the most informative and logical explan ations i have read, it also debunks explosives read it first then say no way later
melonman2000 1 month ago in playlist More videos from bobbbennett
4:07 … that "other" force is called the rest of the building. explosive would have exerted uneven pressure on the facade sending it tumbling, the top rotating faster than the bottom, so that the piece would make contact with the ground parallel to the surface.
anthonya241 1 month ago
2:04 the facade separated partially, thats why it appears lower, the debris mass is still over 10 floors above piling up onto the core, you can see the upper portion of the facarde falling in the 3 seconds after 2:04
anthonya241 1 month ago
for one, the official report did not say the core was weakened, it said that the fireproofing was mostly blasted off int he explosion and during impact. The trussed supporting the floors weakened…
anthonya241 1 month ago
i love how everyone with a conspiracy theory is automatically a structural engineer...
5cbb9 1 month ago
@5cbb9 i love how anyone who disagrees with people who think critically about the most important event of the early 21st century need only name-call and make disparaging insults to gain instant crediblility,....
lezzunz4fR33 1 month ago
Hence why people hate Obama more than ever now that he announced that the troops are coming back home, maybe because he has balls to say "Enough" to a waste of money and lives and lies in these wars.
wisdom9195 3 months ago
was the song?... gold bless thoses people on 9\11
cathlic2007 3 months ago
So sick of hearing about the towers 'pancaking'. What building has ever done that? It's not a real thing, it's just put out there as an ironclad theory that automatically has credit. If there was 'pancaking' you would see visual resistance and the collapse would slowwww down. It would not accelerate. Also, the top on both towers lean in the beginning, meaning only one side was collapsing, why would the other side suddenly push down with equal force and 'pancake' the floors? Preposterous.
edyken77 4 months ago 2
@Hotters70603XL Dude, go away. 707s and 767s are very, very different. And if fires didn't exist past the impact point, then why were there people in the lobby that got burned on 80% of their body by flames shooting out of the elevator shafts. The fires weren't meant to melt steel; just weaken it. Half the stuff you question can be explained by common sense. You guys are disrespecting all of the families and victims of this horrible event.
muziknurd384 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FYI a candle flame burns 1273 Kelvin. A CANDLE FLAME!
iMaDeMoN2012 5 months ago
FYI a candle flame burns 1273 Kelvin. A CANDLE FLAME!
iMaDeMoN2012 5 months ago
@Hotters70603XL Steel weaken when hot losing 50% of it's strength at temperature at cold as 800 kelvin. A three times this weaken structure can fall, the Titanic can sink. Metal flying at near 600mph breaking support beams, fuel explosion, then a fire weakening the steel. However I already know you are too stupid and delusional to understand any of this. I'm only saying this so intelligent people can laugh at your stupidity.
iMaDeMoN2012 5 months ago
You guys have to be kidding me.The explosions are explained by the fact that all the floors collapsing pushed an immense amount of air, with nowhere to go. It blew out windows. Same with the initial impact of the plane. When the plane hit, it cause a gargantuan explosion, sending flames and jet fuel spewing down the elevator shafts, sending flames and fuel throughout the whole building and weakening the integrity of the whole building. C'mon.Do your research before telling others to do the same.
muziknurd384 5 months ago
The only thing "fishy" is your breath.
MrDasher01 5 months ago
did you know that hitler was catholic and was elected in a country which was 90% christian?
did you know that nazis were behind the killing of JFK and their first order of business after he was dead was to escalate the war in vietnam?
did you know that george bush's grandpappy was a nazi?
along with henry ford too?
not to mention quite a few big businesses on wallstreet.
did you know that 9/11 was an inside job and george bush destroyed all the evidence?
vengencefrom1979 5 months ago
@Hotters70603XL Houston we have a truther moron!
BladeJones 5 months ago
This video is "joke science". Perhaps the author of this nonsense would like to explain how explosive charges survived 800 + degree flames for 1 hour and 41 minutes? Anyone who believes this video is beyond stupid and gullible as hell.
BladeJones 5 months ago
@BladeJones do you know ANYTHING about thermite? if not quit spreading bullshit.
vengencefrom1979 5 months ago
@vengencefrom1979 You're like OJ, still looking for the REAL killer. Yawn....
BladeJones 5 months ago
@BladeJones we know who the real killers are.
vengencefrom1979 5 months ago
@vengencefrom1979 Really? Tell us. Let us know where Jim Morrison and Elvis are being held while you're at it.
SupportAZ 5 months ago
@SupportAZ they arent being held anywheres. they are living in switzwerland. look it up.
vengencefrom1979 5 months ago
@BladeJones Don't forget, the charges were throughout the entire buildings, fired below and above impact zones. What caused the utter disintegration of the tops of the towers, especially the south tower? Where were the platforms (steel and cement) of the floors? Cement breaking down is one thing, but the "trays" that it was poured into were steel. How did they turn to powder? I saw and touched this residue myself. The cross support beams? All of them? Nahh...
frankbateau1 2 months ago
@frankbateau1 What causes disintegration of rocks when huge chucks break off and fall in Yosemite? When things fall from great heights they break apart and get pulverized. It's called kinetic energy. Google it. Anyone who can't see the simple cause and effect of the planes causing these towers to fall needs to stop watching Hollywood movies.
YourInvestmentAdvise 2 months ago
@YourInvestmentAdvise I hear you.
I hear you. I mentioned the cement. This does not explain the disintegreation of solid steel. Drop a large 4 inch thick x 30 foot long steel beam from 1000 feet and see if it reduces to it's primal elements. Please re-read my comment. The floors were not just big slabs of concrete. In huge rockfalls, the rocks do not completly reduce to powder, they break into various sizes, some sand may form, but baby powder? The trays? Nahh..
frankbateau1 2 months ago
@frankbateau1 Steel was not reduced to powder. LOL. Anyone who says is was is just plain off in another universe. Some 185,101 tons of structural steel were hauled away from ground zero. The bulk of the steel was shipped to China and India. The Chinese firm Baosteel purchased 50,000 tons at a rate of $120 per ton.
YourInvestmentAdvise 2 months ago
@YourInvestmentAdvise NO we are not in outer space. You have made a very important and insightful and truthful statement. Thank you! Seriously. I have no problem adjusting my opinions or course, I am asking questions. No matter what site you visit, there is confusion pain, etc etc about 9/11. I am glad we can still discuss this on Youtube. We need to take it higher. My position is, simply that. It does not all add up. Something is amiss. Victims are still passing away. :(
frankbateau1 2 months ago
@YourInvestmentAdvise One other thing, ther are photos and videoes showing some upright beams clearly cut at straight angles. Nuff said.
frankbateau1 2 months ago
i always thought that was kind of weird and why it didnt topple on any other buildings. but i saw the video and the building twisted on its self
itsYajaira 5 months ago
one other thing, the terrorists planted bombs in there before hoping it would crash as planned, but it was a failure. do you not realized they could have planted them too... dont blame others for the past. this is this countries greatest flaw, not letting go of the freaking past. get over. celebrate the lives lost, not blame the government. or else we will never move on and just honor those in this tragady... DX
BloodyValentines1 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God! do you not see that the angle of the tower and how they crashed into it was like cutting a tree down. the wind above probably knocked it over but we all blame the government for this one. but why would the government do this? to get money? well you wouldnt get much and if you did it would probably raise debt... -.-
BloodyValentines1 5 months ago
God! do you not see that the angle of the tower and how they crashed into it was like cutting a tree down. the wind above probably knocked it over but we all blame the government for this one. but why would the government do this? to get money? well you wouldnt get much and if you did it would probably raise debt... -.-
BloodyValentines1 5 months ago
God! do you not see that the angle of the tower and how they crashed into it was like cutting a tree down. the wind above probably knocked it over but we all blame the government for this one. but why would the government do this? to get money? well you wouldnt get much and if you did it would probably raise debt... -.-
BloodyValentines1 5 months ago
then why did only one tower collapse if there was explosives in the basements and lower floors of BOTH towers?
TeamMcHacks 6 months ago
your points are invalid, it wasn't at free fall speed, the "explosives" is obviously a downdraft of air and smoke coming out of the windows from the massive collapsing building
drownthequeers6969 6 months ago
@drownthequeers6969 i saw that and thought the same thing...this whole this is still suspicious, but yea that was one thing that came 2 my mind.
QueenMiMi1001 5 months ago
Doesn't fucking matter. Plane hit the buildings and the buildings fell down. The end.
luvsrq 6 months ago
@luvsrq It is BEYOND obvious. Soo many people are too stupid to complete high school. They blame the world for their stupidity and failures, they muck up jury pools, post moronic videos on YouTube, etc.
BladeJones 5 months ago
i dont see explosions.....oh wait! wait!...no, still no explosives. its quit obvious that this we clearly planned though, i mean the media clearly points out those involved:
bush
yogi bear
britney spears
justin timberlake
heath ledger
its clear that they did the 911 attacks...i mean, its common sense people!
oh yeah, the 343 firefighters voluntarily allowed themselves to die too in order to try to cover up this obvious inside job.
bobbbennet, your a jackass!
TheMawkMan 6 months ago
your all crazy the building collapsed by the jet feul its not a conspiracy trust all thses fucking anti amrican government retards to start making shit up the building collapsed and killed many people instead of doin bullshit videos like this people should be paying respect to all those who died or lost a loved one
Driftking859 6 months ago
Although conspiratorilism is tempting considering the magnitude of events, I have been looking at videos, news stories and even conspiracy videos, and from this it is clear that what happened on 9/11 was a terrible act of terrorism and people trying to find answers in the small mysteries, are clinging on to false hope
toomanysam 6 months ago
ZioNazis could make the Havaara agreement with Hitler, the Bank of International Settlements with many Jews working there could finance the Third Reich. The Zionazis could give a dam about 6 million common Jews and 3 million Polish Christians. Operation Susannah, USS Liberty attack, They own the news media, Hollywood, Obama, Boener and the Supreme Court. Of course ZioNazis could pull off 9/11 and get away with it. All debunkers that troll here are stupid bought off goy chattel.
WiscoKiddProductions 6 months ago
any child can see there is a great deal more than a simple collapse. there are many who have a lot riding on maintaining their own ignorance. they insult because they are insecure and afraid of others saying the obvious. if this wasn't terrorism than i gave up my son for a lie. i voted for a murderer or maybe more than one murderer. that hurts people enough to make them desperate to not understand that we were taken for a ride that continues even today. we will not win even if everyone knows
anameaboveallothers 6 months ago in playlist More videos from bobbbennett
Force2: Do a little reading on dynamic vs static loading, fluid dynamics and pneumatics. Remember grade school math?
The structure was designed to carry a static load, the 25 stories above impact. Pretend instead, that you were on the 93rd floor and I placed a 50lb dumbbell on your foot. Nothing, right?
Now instead, I drop the 50 pound weight on your foot from the 94th floor. Emergency room, right? Force = mass x velocity.
Your 'explosions' are pneumatic blowouts of windows.
fascistcat 6 months ago
@fascistcat Yeah, I'm not yet convinced it was charges either, though there are arguments against it being just air too, like why all the "dust" when the blowouts are 20-stories below the collapsing front, although the leading edge of a 100-ft of beam punching through the ceiling would make that amt. of dust. What I DO find troubling however is WTC 7 which is OBVIOUSLY a controlled demolition.. As well as how quickly all the steel was shipped off to China. You'd think it would B studied.
Snoep76239 6 months ago
Force: I actually thought that you were going to quantify the force that WAS necessary to pancake the floors (1:25), but I should have known better when you used the word "weight."
At 3:54 you say, "where is the weight and force needed to..?" OK, I'll play 'Who's Smarter than a Fifth Grader?' What is the force needed? You are claiming that there was insufficient force without telling us how much force would be needed or how much is evident.
fascistcat 6 months ago
Ask yourself..Why are they banning the first responders from the 10 yr anniversary? Maybe their upset they were told the air was safe, all got sick, denied coverage, 10 yrs later get it if their screened through a terror watch list. Bush & Obama will be there claiming to be hero's when the real hero's aren't permitted? This is not a conspiracy theory just the cold truth about 9/11 that continues to sicken me. I know I'll be there in 16 days paying tribute to the real hero's.
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 6 months ago
I love how you play such beautiful music to such an amazing loss of life you inconsiderate prick. Did you fail @ Georgia Tech or MIT. Force coming down a stairwell or elevator shaft could produce windows and sections of building to blow out . Go back to playing Warcraft in your Mom's basement.
pcgizzleable 6 months ago
If as the "experts" say it was a "pancake collapse", then please explain to me and the rest of the intelligent free world, WHERE are the 47 MASSIVE core columns? The should have been sticking straight up like a wedding night cock. But they were'nt. Can you explain THAT in the tired old pancake theory? I didnt think so. They were cut with cutting charges and brought down with the rest of the building. God what a travesty the whole thing was/is.
orangevalesweetpea 6 months ago
@orangevalesweetpea Pay attention. Notice that you see stuff leaning over after the colklapse wave passes? The dust is hiding the breakup of the core. It is taking a pounding from the floor slabs beating against it. It wasn't meant to stand alone.You are an idiot. There is not sign of any cutting torch use until late in the cleanup. That's how they had to remove the stubs of the columns. Learn some basic research skills, you nattering moron.
leftysergeant 6 months ago
What actually happened was that at the tilting of the top when the south tower collapsed. If you look right where the plane hit when the south tower begins to collapse. It sorta collapses inwards, causing shockwaves to go to the other side of the south tower. At some point, since the top part and the bottom parts of the south tower collided, those shockwaves pulled alart the top half, but all that weight continued the collapse of the south tower. A global shockwave weakened the whole structure.
RHVids100 6 months ago
Why was most of the debris disposed of so quickly and so little of it saved? It DOESN'T make a lick of sense to me. WHY the big rush???
maverickdallas100 7 months ago
It wasn't the "government". Only a small faction of the government.
xcited4vids 9 months ago
If you don't like America's government, why don't you leave? Because we don't want dumb fucks like you blaming the bloodiest day in the United States since Antietam on the government.
kirstinxxcouture 9 months ago
@kirstinxxcouture well then the tea baggers should get the hell out, and the right to lifers, and anyone who don't like the way america is run, right asshole??
fillyferz 7 months ago
@fillyferz exactly glad you understand c:
kirstinxxcouture 7 months ago
@kirstinxxcouture listen little girl, you don't know shit, this thing was controlled demo.go buy a new lipstick
fillyferz 7 months ago
@fillyferz It wasn't a controlled demolition you ignorant fuck.
breadsped98 7 months ago
@breadsped98 OK you rude stupid FUCK breadspeed, then it was a plain old DEMOLITION.....There, ya HAPPY NOW?
orangevalesweetpea 6 months ago
@orangevalesweetpea nope. your ignorance is so ridiculous for there is no proof of controlled demolition and there would be no need for it from the intense fires and structural damage.
breadsped98 6 months ago
@fillyferz Stop thinking with your balls, twooftard. Even if they were meant for mental work, it would still leave you in the developmentally challenged group.
leftysergeant 6 months ago
the 'exploseves' was just the air bieing preesed out of the building
atomball1 11 months ago
@nuclearfallout217 Go ahead and keep up your trying to kill free speech about 9/11 dipwad. You're going to wind up certifying your right to gurgle with a ball strapped in your mouth chained to a wall before you march your way into a death chamber, your final steps made in leg chains. If you don't want to hear about 9/11, because what people say about 9/11 upsets you, then don't browse effen webpages of 9/11 videos you effen moron.
danielvincentkelley 11 months ago
@nukefallou You need to look up conspiracy. It does not pertain specifically to any type of crime apart from a crime that is committed by multiple parties who communicate in planning said crime. You're the idiot. Why did you mention your dad if he's not who you know that died on 9/11. Maybe you do know someone who died on 9/11. You're a disgrace to their memory out here on the internet trying to kill free speech about 9/11 with your petty guilt trip. You're a hugely asinine offense to humanity.
danielvincentkelley 11 months ago
@nuclearfallout217 You're the a$s#ole, trying to guilt people away from discussing 9/11 with bogus stories of your dead dad you effen monster lieing a$s B*tch! The government DOES absolutely claim it was a conspiracy of Muslim men from Saudi Arabia primarily, all men of military age. Conspiratorial crime means only that multiple parties to the crime communicated in planning the crime. You're not only a complete a hole you're also a total moron. Good bye.
danielvincentkelley 11 months ago
The only thing missing to supply the extra force was Godzilla's foot. It was nothing else BUT a controlled demolition. The best to date and a future combat systems test. Welcome to the Matrix.
Psy0psAgent 11 months ago
@nuclearfallout217 If you believe the government story, it was a conspiracy. The government claims it was a conspiracy of Saudi Agents, mostly upper middle class Saudi guys of military age. You're the disgrace and a traitorous treasonous dush b, selling government propaganda trying to present yourself as a victim of 9/11.
danielvincentkelley 11 months ago
THINGS FALL AT AN ACCELERATING SPEED OF 9.82 M/S^2! DID YOU NOT TAKE HIGH SCHOOL PHYSICS? THE TIME IT TOOK TO FALL IS NOT THE SAME AS THE ACCELERATION OF WHICH IT FELL. EVEN WITH THAT IT TOOK LONGER THAN 9.8 SECONDS, IT TOOK ABOUT 14 OR SOMETHING OF THE SORT. sorry for the caps, i just wanted people to see it. haha
wiislotmaker 1 year ago
I am not sure on the north and south tower, but building 7 was a demo......This whole 911 was an inside job to get all of this new national security shit started..Now look at it, after 911 you cannot hardly travel without TSA or some other asshole with a badge drilling you about where, when and why in your life...You are a terrorist until you can prove otherwise...Fuck the NWO....
avionicswirenut 1 year ago
@avionicswirenut Security was stood down at the WTC over a whole weekend, in the weeks before 9/11. That was meal worm Silverstein's opportunity to have the demolition work done on his newly leased and hugely insured towers. The tower collapse was an insurance scam too. Silverstein had only put up a couple million to lease the towers, which began just that summer and he took out insurance that paid off 8 BILLION if I recall correctly.
danielvincentkelley 11 months ago
@danielvincentkelley Polititions were told not to fly on that day...The evidence goes on and on...The fucking writing is on the wall and most Americans cannot read it.....And now we in another fucking war....Impeach Obama....
avionicswirenut 11 months ago
@avionicswirenut The bulk of the purpose of demolishing the towers, was to kill the firefighters. To kill some office workers at the WTC and some travelers on holiday, isn't quite the psychological jolt the American people needed to go spend trillions of dollars stealing oil from the people of Iraq and enforce a cheap oil pipeline on the people of Afghanistan and weaken the US military, 40,000 disabled by the Iraq war, that the US fall easier prey to what's next, nuke terror, then nuke war.
danielvincentkelley 11 months ago
@avionicswirenut So that was the purpose AND the effect of demolishing the towers, the first responders, some police and bunches of firemen, were murdered while the building was pulverized. The effect on the US psyche, bunch of flag waving war seeking war getting simpletons was carried off without a hitch. Evidence that the buildings were demolished is abundant. Free fall speed, steel not melting at jet fuel fire temperatures, thermate in the dust, whole building powderized, thermite burnt steel
danielvincentkelley 11 months ago
The puddle of fire under "the pile" burnt for MONTHS. That the government is murderous enough to do it, demolish the buildings is made clear by their sending people to work "the pile" which was asbestos, mercury lightbulbs, all kinds of toxic building materials melting into a puddle of thermate, which is a material that burns hot enough to melt steel. So, with all that in the air and the air quality assessment showing very bad air, they sent those guys to work in the mess no respirators.
danielvincentkelley 11 months ago
Bush's father was the president of the CIA. Somehow that connects. I really want to see who agrees with me. Im not being a thumbs up whore, but if you agree, thubs up! if you disagree thumbs down.
crashspeed100 1 year ago
@crashspeed100 G.H.W. Bush Senior quote from when he was the head of the CIA: "The only way to make a Syrian man talk, is to behead his children in front of him."
danielvincentkelley 11 months ago
@bobbbennett
I think you are wrong, it's not the roof of the building that we can see get out of smoke but the impact zone, look better at the angle of the fall of the roof of the building and the angle of column who get out of smoke, you should see. I think the roof of the building entered inside the building and pushed the zone of impact.
Anyway, this collapse is not normal, inside job.!?
Sorry for my bad english.
69ladouille1 1 year ago
The psyop end of this enjoys the populace self destructing.....ugh
MrNoblemanoflove 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
The government had their roll in this, and if you THINK otherwise, then you might have down syndrome =). The true enemy of the US is its Government, I don't understand why this isn't obvious by now. But then again, after having Bush as your president, and seeing how brainless he was, I'm not so surprised anymore.
RoboBagons 1 year ago 9
Comment removed
chrisgoes80rawr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RoboBagons dude, just stop talking. what reasoning do you have for the government to do something like this? do yourself a favor and educate yourself to at least a second grade level and stop with the conspiracy bullshit. the reason it isnt obvious is because it aint true. NOBODY FUCKING CARES! if thats what you think then go live in afganistan if this government is so horrible FAG!
chrisgoes80rawr 1 year ago
@RoboBagons so you are saying that the majority of Americans have down syndrome and this little group of idiot conspiracy theorist have the true meaning to everything? no. you have no proof at all of government involvement in 9/11.
breadsped98 7 months ago
@breadsped98 the initial collapse of WTC 2 progresses as fast as falling debris, how is that possible?, did the intact portion have the resistance of air?
fillyferz 6 months ago 5
@RoboBagons Prove it.
spoogeling 6 months ago
@RoboBagons oh ya then what do u think the government did in this 9/11 attack u cunt
AsianHoPz 6 months ago
@RoboBagons i agree 90% pecent with u but hey dont make fun of people with down syndrome they r normal people with a slow process kay?
iluvjb5678 5 months ago
@RoboBagons the U.S. government would not blow up the twin towers and the fucking pentagon to start a war with Al Qaeda, Al Qaeda would do that (go figure). Yeah sure, there are justifiable reasons to not trust the gov't but 9/11 sure isn't one of them. I think you might have down syndrome a bit.
LordZoldemort 5 months ago
you spelled "vacuum" wrong.
oh & your logic is flawed.
ImVeggieIAm 1 year ago
@ImVeggieIAm And you forgot to capitalize the start of your sentences, and used "&" in place of "and".
If you're going to Grammar Nazi someone, at least try to get your own sentences grammatically right.
NamikazeH 1 year ago
@NamikazeH i think you'll find using "&" instead of "and" isn't 'incorrect', merely unconventional. as for calling me a grammar Nazi, i commented on someone's spelling; grammar has nothing to do with it. so before YOU start having a go at someone for being hypocritical, make sure you get your facts right. :)
ImVeggieIAm 1 year ago
Dude!! For one thing one floor is incapable of holding 30 floors that are moving as one unit. That is what the airplane accomplished. It took out the support and flooring across a few floors. Without the floors the ext wall just crumples. What you are seeing toward the end there fall outward is the exterior wall which has had all of its flooring sheered off by the 30 stories collapsing past it. I saw a video specifically on this and it shows that wall tilting out.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
Also consider the rubble pile from a 1/4 mile high structure that just pancaked. There would have been girders everywhere. Armor thick steel just pulverized into a fine powder. The strongest buildings in the world free fell in its own footprint in a cloud of micron sized dust in 9 seconds. Molten steel burning in a hole for months. Connect the dots.
eturkreenz 1 year ago
@eturkreenz Dude, look at pictures of the wreckage. You can clearly see huge intact pieces of steel
Phygar1 1 year ago
@Phygar1 at the bottom where you wouldn't need to put explosives? you think the government would be that dumb about it, there is sufficient evidence linking them too it i beleive, but it's just to hard to really beleive that they could do that
rickyp17 1 year ago
its weird that but i think i might have the answer to the explosions part.Every building in the world needs a heating source but the only way to fuel it is with Oil wich is highly explosive so the collapse could have triggered the explosions.
AndersonFamily12 1 year ago
of course i've heard of them all. they were all indeed terrible, and in terms of numbers dead, you're right. most of these were the orders of one evil ruler - hitler, stalin (purges) etc., or one government being overly aggressive to another country. however i believe 9/11 is worse and indeed the most despicable act committed to mankind because of the way the american government has deceived its own people, and possibly even planned it all. i really hope assange has something on this!
okukok 1 year ago
there is no way that a plane flying into such a building could have precipitated such an effect. the building could not collapse at the speed of gravity because of fire damage, no chance on earth. until the truth is uncovered, this will remain the most atrocious and despicable act ever committed to mankind.
okukok 1 year ago
@okukok "this will remain the most atrocious and despicable act ever committed to mankind." Hmmm, ever heard of something called the Holocaust? Obviously you weren't around during The Blitz. What about a place called Hiroshima? Nagasaki? Heard of them? What about the firebombings of Dresden and Tokyo? All of these make 9/11 pale in comparison, and all but the first two were committed by AMERICANS.
liber8d83 1 year ago
The why keep looking is the truth is needed. Sure planes hit the towers - but there has been many fires in towers worldwide without any doing a freefall like 3 wtc bldgs.. not to mention why did wtc bld 7 fall straight down? Where was the plane debri at the pentagon? How about the plane that fell in the open field - where was that debri & human remains? For years I thought Alex Jones and 9/11 truthers were nuts.. but after alot of research I question 9/11. Research research research folks.
MakkIsLooking 1 year ago
to all the people out there who keep saying 9-11 was setup and an inside job and for everyone that keeps trying to prove that strange things happened, why? 9-11 happened, there WERE casualites and there is nothing we can do about it now. It is possible for people to edit some of the videos to make it look strange and cause therories. But, its over, people died and proving that there were bombs and other strange things wont help the situation at all. There is nothing we can do
ilikepieboy10 1 year ago
@ilikepieboy10 Why? Because if indeed this was planned in advance - what else has happened in our past - and what is planned for our future? The folks whom lost loved ones deserve the truth. So do the American public. As do folks elsewhere too.
A prelude for attacking Iraq for oil? That would be the crueliest lost of lives if so. Or perhaps a prelude to Patriot Act - which was enhanced by BO. What change's are yet to come?
MakkIsLooking 1 year ago
@ilikepieboy10 I agree, people will always be trying to understand what happened because it was such a horrific event, but whats done is done. Figuring it out HOW the terrorists did it won't change the fact that they killed thousands of people!
brandonrak 1 year ago
After 3+ years of looking at the WTC recently I realized that all the smoke we see is concrete and office contents being pulverized in mid air. the streams of smoke are the floors being powdered in mid air. We can "clearly" see the streams of vaporizing concrete, each 20x60 ft section makes a stream of smoke as it separates from the 47 central backbones., How is Concrete exploded like that? Is the concrete itself is an explosive? Could nanothermite do this It's a proven fact in all dust samples
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
THank you for adding this.
Keep showing the facts to everyone (in a polite way / don't force a message down someones throat). It is so important that the truth comes out. NewCorp (fox news) and their smaller companies (comcast, etc) are buying every single media outlet they can find - they want only to hypnotize you with lies, to further their agenda.
Echdrum 1 year ago
Beautiful work bobbennett, keep helping. The Truth Will Set You Free!
Jackblind1000 1 year ago
The upper steel cage that broke away and fell off was much lighter (steel-wise) and flimsier than what was below.. The core columns were tapered with thinner steel and were lighter as you went upwards in both towers.
Jackblind1000 1 year ago
Another interesting fact is, that every floor in the tower was engineered to hold the weight of the upper structure several times. That steel cage was super strong underneath.
Why did the upper section fall off, blow up in mid air and then collapse every other remaining floor? Impossible.
Jackblind1000 1 year ago
/watch?v=qhyu-fZ2nRA&feature=related
Go look at this, it shows you that the top did indeed fell forward, and its logical given where to airplane entered.. but i want you guys to take a look at the puffs of smoke, the fact that they are appearing all under the collapsing area is a proof of the pankake theory.
Once something that big is pulled into such gravity mechanism, it takes just an insane resistance which just wasnt there. The top portion fell in a straigth line f or about 30floors.
insid3rkill3r 1 year ago
the top portion was about 45floors tall, and the following 20-30 floors right under it suffered full pressure once it collapsed since as u see on all those tapes, the top portion nearly fell in a straight line for quite a while, once that mechanism is started, the remaining 40-50 floors under are not quite enough to stop it.
The north is clear evidence of that. the top fell in a straight line, and the weight wasnt even as heavy. But once it starts, the collapsing only gets STRONGER, not weaker
insid3rkill3r 1 year ago
@insid3rkill3r I smell a troll
skb0rzn 1 year ago
this is great. for it to be a pancake effect to top must come straight down, and this shows exactly that it didnt! thank you.
AsPinkAsAPanther 1 year ago
Thank you for this video, thank you for taking the time to help all the sheep of this country that are too stupid, fearful, and doubtful to believe what really happened.
*Scholars for 9-11 Truth & Justice*
*Honor the Fallen with Truth!*
Erikali26 1 year ago
Check this shit out :
Marvin Bush, W.'s brother, worked for Securacom that provided security for WTC, Dulles Airport and United Airlines around 9/11. Then there's the anthrax sent to Democrats and the media. Then you have the insider trading pre 9/11 on put options betting that United and American Airlines stock would drop. Rumsfeld said "Flight 93 was shot down in press conference". The official story is a conspiracy!
DrugstoreCFH 1 year ago
Good job on showing the tower fall to one side and cannot possibly have enough weight to create the 'Pancake Theory'.
truthforthesheep 1 year ago
If you want to be convincing at least check your spelling!
danalan666 1 year ago
Were there any security officers or bomb scanner at both towers? Please answer if you know.
kimslandthegreat 1 year ago
@kimslandthegreat yes, actually there were but records all say that bomb sniffing dogs were pulled out of the towers (including building 7) in the the coming days before 9/11 for no apparent reason at all.
RazielHasRisen 1 year ago
@RazielHasRisen hmm.. this is very interesting. But why do they have to do such thing like that. Bringing the towers down with ~3K ppl!!
kimslandthegreat 1 year ago
Little bit off-topic, but at 2:57, we can very clearly see a massive ejection of dust and debris from the very bottom of the impact zone BEFORE the top section begins to move. How is it that anyone can fervently deny the use of explosives when such video evidence exists?
Jimulacrum 1 year ago
Very good work!!
haolejohn 1 year ago
At first, I was going to say that the way the South Tower collaped was because it was hit at the corner of the building. Of course the corner would be weakened and cause the building to collapse at that angle. But when I saw the rest of the video, you're right! There were small explosions on lower floors as the tower started to fall. If it was just a "physics collapse" as others have thought, only the top of the tower would've fallen and left a huge hole in the remainder of the building.
HolyRoller478 1 year ago
You want me to believe your theory AND think for myself? (laughs)
VideoMenu 1 year ago
@VideoMenu Think for yourself and don't instantly accept the official story as the truth and you know that's what he meant you just wanted to be a dick.
mrwizard319 1 year ago
What does it mean "Total collapse time was 9.8 seconds. "That's freefall speed in a vacuum."'? and why is the claim about freefall speed in quotes? Did someone else make the mistake and you are using it?
jwmking42 1 year ago
@jwmking42 They fell about the time it would take for a billiard ball to fall from the top of where the buildings once stood.
Goobie100 1 year ago
On some things the media wants to normalize the unthinkable where it concerns the vested interests of their owners they like to the impossible probable by authoritarian official's say so & relying on the viewer's ignorance of basic physics to manipulate them. The rest of the world is on to these criminals, the US population is too stupid to get a grasp of what really happened.
tomestubbs 1 year ago
@tomestubbs dumb use of words. Trying to sound clever, but failing big time! lol
gorf64 1 year ago
@gorf64 Trying to sound clever yourself by debasing the content of my statement. Interesting fallacy. The topic here is about the collapse of the WTC and how it did not get covered. Why not stick to the content rather than the ad hominem attacks. By the way you had nothing to say here on this 9-11 posting as far as I can see so, do you lack anything to to say?
tomestubbs 1 year ago
Bobbennet may the reason be because you are an asshole and a Muslim ?
moknowsky 1 year ago
this obviously wasn't just something they done out of the blue, they had planned it carefully and probably over time, and if i'm honest, i believe from research Americans had actually planned this attack, why? well i dont have a fucking clue some people are fucked up simple as..
Peachyyable 1 year ago
Comment removed
VicenzoV 1 year ago
@Peachyyable another asshole Muslim !!
moknowsky 1 year ago
@MERCURHILLMANIAC And you are a conspiracy whacker. I find that conspiracy bottom feeders get a charge out of the feelings of superiority while calling the rest of us blind and weak. You are a whacker. I'm not feeling terrorized. I feel sorry for the tiny rodents who get their only thrills from imagining conspiracy in events that are truly horrible but of no more significance than that.
chaosIsTheOnlyPower 1 year ago
Weight IS force times mass. Anything that falls is under the influence of the same force - gravity. Your use of "least" and "most" resistance is completely baffling. Are you saying that without explosives the towers would have collapsed more slowly? Faster? Not at all? And a couple puffs of dust out of a couple windows does not show enough additional force to make an argument either way. Cool music though!
chaosIsTheOnlyPower 1 year ago
@MERCURHILLMANIAC I see no explosions and see no reason that the top ten floors should have fallen (not "should have fell") into the street. I am not afraid of any truth. The folks who recognize this as an act of terrorism are not a herd of cowering rabbits.
chaosIsTheOnlyPower 1 year ago
anybody who honestly thinks this was done by our own government is fuckin mental
redtailedboa4 1 year ago
@redtailedboa4 totally agree.
Mynamesnigel 1 year ago
@redtailedboa4 IT wasn't the government dont you get it? It was done by the private companies that own the government / and the buildings. Striping it down why would 3 buildings fall perfectly into a nice neat pile on the ground (one of which had no fire in it) think how much insurance is on those buildings and think of how much money can be made for weapons contractors (if only they had somebody to fight / invade at the time)
favsncrap 1 year ago
@favsncrap Duh you stupid idiot the buildings had planes fukll of jet fuel in them !! so many morons and I bet you are a liberal !
moknowsky 1 year ago
@moknowsky Lmfao you are the biggest turd i ever spoke to.. no im actually a balanced minded person (unlike the "American" liberal) however English liberalism is completely different to your insane take on politics in the states. Besides im not a liberal British or otherwise .. however you would know that in the entire history a steel skyscraper has never fallen from fire PERIOD its PLANE science.. fire does not burn evenly and when its suffocated by smoke YOU STINKIN' APE
favsncrap 1 year ago
@moknowsky The dominance of nonsense and lower IQ's exist withing the realm of the Reich wing party! Reich wing nuts have absolutely no knowledge of logic! Jet fuel does not get hot enough to compromise structural quality steel, it's = 2 heating a stainless steel pot on the stove.
tomestubbs 1 year ago
@CamosIOI I apologize for offending you then. And I agree, there needs to be answers. But it doesn't seem like it's my responsibility to find them. I will do whatever I can to help others though. Thanks for the video links btw, I will check them out.
dillonrockband 1 year ago
Collapse time was over 16 seconds.
A floor in the WTC could handle 1,300t and the tops weighed over 50,000t. A service floor could in no way stop the collapse. On the other hand they had the bottoms of the elevator shafts so any air being pushed in the shafts would escape from those points. The bases of the cores remained intact. There were no strong explosions recorded, none powerful enough to damage the structure.
Exactly how much explosives would be required to create those jets?
Weirdo10o4 1 year ago
i dont get it
JBap13 1 year ago
an event of this magnitude shouldn't leave structural engineers, government officials, the general public, etc. etc. with so many questions as to what happened. nothing is in the open. we know the govt story is a lie. let's overthrow.
ESSmyDEE13 1 year ago
Great observation!!
katlovesall 2 years ago
It's amazing what you can come up with when you don't let Truthers dictate the terms of your skepticism.
I am on one of the more technical of the Truther sites. I'll raise it there.
mthai66 2 years ago
@mthai66 Look up krakatoa on how things work. good info scary that man can come up with all this stuff.
katlovesall 2 years ago
A message to all out there who are watching this video in their attempt to seek the truth. You need to ask yourself a simple question.
What kind of people watch and then make comments on a video like this? Answer - those who are seeking the truth and those that are being paid to promote the lie.
Be wary of those who spend a lot of time on here both attacking and defending the "official" story. Its far from normal behavior.
I believe some of these comments are scripted.
ole9421 2 years ago
Here's something else to think about: The two towers fall at the same rate, even though WTC1 has a larger proportion of the building falling through fewer undamaged floors.
mthai66 2 years ago
@mthai66 thats because everything falls at the same rate
6687Jason 1 year ago
You're an idiot. Look up terminal velocity and substitute steel reinforced concrete instead of air.
mthai66 1 year ago
@6687Jason not if there are obstructions. if i fall from the top of a tree, i'm going to fall slower than if i jump off a building. i'll hit lots of branches on the way down. now, if someone were to remove or cut those branches as i fell, or, say, all the steel between floor 110 and the ground, then i, or, say, the building, would fall much faster. which is what happened. the steel in the building was prepared for demoliton.
ESSmyDEE13 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@6687Jason not if there are obstructions. if i fall from the top of a tree, i'm going to fall slower than if i jump off a building. i'll hit lots of branches on the way down. now, if someone were to remove or cut those branches as i fell, or, say, all the steel between floor 110 and the ground, then i, or, say, the building, would fall much faster. which is what happened. the steel in the building was prepared for demoliton.
ESSmyDEE13 1 year ago
I agree, the concrete wouldnt be pulverized to microscopic dust from a "pancake collapse" this is implausible. Where there is an action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Where was the resistance from the building when the plane impacted ? Aluminum doesnt destroy steel, the plane did not decelerate as it hit the tower. The building did not decelerate as it encountered resistance during the collapse as would be expected, there was little resistance, pancaking is an impossible explanation.
babybluesnowden 2 years ago
There was a video somewhere on youtube that had some clips off of news stations saying that they heard small explosions at the base of one of the towers (in the video, you can hear them too).
iAdvertiseSites 2 years ago
I understand your theory and it appreciate the work that it took to arrange this, but i doubt they would have put explosives inside because there would be no point in doing so. Also [as Jason said] somebody would have noticed. Also, the momentum from the collapsing top part (regardless of whether it fell to the side) would have still pushed into the lower floors, and thus continuing the collapse.
Pilot853 2 years ago
If there were explosives don't you think someone would have noticed people planting them? It would have taken weeks if not months to prep. a building for demolition. Where was the detonation cord at? Don't you think it would have been seen? When a building is brought down, the inside is almost completely gutted out first and load bearing walls are weakened. Nobody is going to bring a building of that size straight down without doing all of that, which would have been seen by at least 100 people!
6687Jason 2 years ago
@6687Jason Not all bombs need cord look up krakatoa on how things work.
katlovesall 2 years ago
@katlovesall ok but there would still need to be lots in place and someone would have seen. just trying to make a point. just going on what i know as a material engineer.
6687Jason 1 year ago
@6687Jason
powerdowns the weekend before..said they were installing new internet cords and computer wires throughout whole buildings..all power was down during that time including cameras and the electronic office doors...look it up
kevo1120 1 year ago