Added: 3 years ago
From: dynmicpara
Views: 106,776
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 250 Billion Barrels of Crude WAR for energy, kill any opposition to USA oil domination.

  • I BLAME BUSH FOR NOT ENOUGH DAMN OIL FROM THAT COUNTRY!!!

  • @0351assman1 usa did not get a drop of oil from there.... britan and france did.. usa just profited tremendously.

  • Usa all the way

  • Ha! anyone of you morale fuckers care to prove you walk your ass everywhere? Or that your computer isnt made of petrol based plastics? When you do then tell me all about how you oppose war for oil! I gurantee you, your the same fucks who stand in line at the gas station and hold the rest of us up, while you bitch to the clerk about how high the prices have become! STFU and turn off your computer, you do know electricity is from dirty coal!

  • Isnt the M113 the same APC one used in nam?

  • @MonteLSV6

    Yes

  • @MonteLSV6 yes. but abit updated, it's also ranked as the best APC in military history.

  • i hope so, but here in europe, most of the ppl (including me) think that the only aim is to secure the oil. dont misunderstand me, im not against the us forces, it is good to know that we are allies. but the bush administration was an instrument, installed by the military-industrial complex. no politics, just profits....

  • @domdadon018 What fucking Oil I havent seen a drop of it at our pumps. This blame Bush thing thats going around the net is just outlandish. Even Demacrats aproved the Invasion and a good part of The U.S population.

    Oh the Irony of a Hypicritical Nation.

  • @Grambo2009 The point of this video is to improve American infantry so it can determine where enemy fire comes from before returning fire--so only enemies are hit not innocent civilians.

  • @dynmicpara

    well thats a good thing a good thing, and I often criticise america;

    I wont even mention wmd's etc!

    My main concern now are the presidential candidates in america; fuck me; how dumb and fake can people be, dumber than bush, the perfect puppets to fool a nation of idiots or hypnotised people.

  • stop Iraq and Afghanistan occupations

    please search this in google

    "One in 40 Iraqis 'killed since invasion"

    "'655,000 Iraqis killed since invasion'"

    END illegal Iraq and Afghanistan occupation

    government allowed 9/11 to happen on purpose

    to convince public and troops to invade Iraq and Afghanistan

    WAR for oil, based on lies!!

  • Boy I Would,ve loved to " CRASH THEM GATES DOIN' 98".

  • Saddam hiding in a Mosque with the women, children and the vaunted Repblublican Guard. Too funny. When pulled from his hole in the ground he was wearing a Burka ...desguised as a woman...lollololololol.

  • -- How does it feel . when you bomb and destroy other Iraqi people , ha ???

    Feels Good right ./..

  • Competent military forces in armored tracks don't need airstrikes as much as weaklings in wheeled trucks...the 3rd ID (M) got little or no help from airpower when they took Baghdad in 2003.

  • @dynmicpara i probably think avionmaster meant killing, shooting, destroying with "bombing" as a synonym. respect for ur work, but i feel sorry for you and your comrades aatacking and invading an innocent country thinking the death of thousands americans and iraqis will bring peace and democracy. stealing oil, killing people and lying at american citizens is a big crime by your administration. ask one mother if its right to loose her son that she can drive with cheap gas to the supermarket...

  • @domdadon018 I oppose the occupation of Iraq/Afghanistan for oil profits. A moral and competent U.S. military would refuse to do this.

  • I gotta say it feels great

  • @aviomaster Why do they shoot at us if they don't won't to die?

  • @aviomaster Haha don't even get started on cowardice, raghead..

  • what the hell was that car doing at 0:20 seconds?

  • @X46RAPTOR because saddams tanks which used to number over 4300 were all destroyed,the republican gaurd were using ordinary cars in hope to destroy U.S m1 abrams.lol.from t72s to cars

  • also, why dont we issue our troops the law72 rocket launcher? we have millions of those rockets sitting on shelves in warehouses. cheap and effective disposable rockets!

  • I do hope those smart men lobbying to dump the Stryker for the Gavin get their way. I've met too many sergeants who've lost friends to crappy Stryker vehicles. One sergeant had been in a convoy, took an IED to his Stryker, and got a 4-inch razor of shrapnel to his plates. It cut right through the plate and sliced open his abdominal wall. He still has to wear the plate in his stomach to keep himself together.

  • thats horrible man. could have been worse but still. I was under the impression that the Stryker was a top notch vehicle? but then again what else is the media going to tell you huh? never heard of the Gavin ill have to look into that.

  • @grooveclubhouse The Stryker is a road-bound deathtrap and lie; a scam by Shinseki to squeeze money from the U.S. taxpayers.

  • In Nam, 113s had 76mm guns on some of them. I drove 113s in the NG and liked them, very reliable, easy to drive, simple to fix and float. Don't like new IFVs.

  • why did they shoot at them? did they know that these peoples are enemies or just civilians?

  • If a column of tanks a mile long were thundering down your street (you can easily hear the sounds of gunfire and explosions coming from a mile away), would you be out and driving around? It wasn't like the entire city didn't know we were coming.

    On several occassions we warned cities and even enemy units before entering a town, that if they wanted to live, it'd be good for them to stay inside.

    We issue similar warnings before clearing insurgent occupied buildings.

  • I would do the same, I wouldnt take the chance

  • bATTLE IN bAGDAD????????

  • I drove an M113 in the army, even that is more tank driving than driving one of those modern tanks, which are like cars with armor. In the M113 you can feel the vehicle and it is not damped through servos and hydraulics.

  • BoarHawg writes:

    "I was a 19D Scout for 11 years, the first six on 113s, then the piece of s**t Brads. For Scouts, it couldn't get worse than the Bradley....too big, too heavy, too loud, too complex, and too slow to keep up with the M1s it's supposed to support. A 113A3 runs rings around it, the only advantage a Brad has is firepower, but if you're a bigger target than a tank without the armor to take hits like a tank, a Brad's firepower doesn't mean a thing."

  • The M113 would be even more effective with gun turrets for better crew/gunner protection. Conversion kits are available for relatively low cost.

  • This reminds me of lyrics from a Rage Against the Machine song;

    "We don't need the key, WE'LL BREAK IN!!!"

  • Your comment also reminds me some lyrics from System Of A Down.

    "You need to enter a room to destroy it! Destroy it! Destroy it!"

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more