So our intelligence agencies are the only bureaucracies in the world that are incapable of incompetence and being asleep at the switch. That's his argument.
"You'll never convince me the government didn't have advanced knowledge." This is the cry of the zealot. Anybody who says there's no amount of evidence that could convince them of something cannot be taken seriously.
why in the world would both the towers fall? Why did they fall straight down? The temperature to make the steel melt couldn't have been that hot to bring the entire thing down? My guess is a Government blew those towers up and they had a bigger reason to go over to Persia than just a hunch on wmd's. They won't even show the twin towers falling anymore on tv and tried to get it taken off the internet many times, the government doesn't want us watching it again cuz it makes us think
@SuperStreetG There's roughly a billion sites where you can watch footage from 9/11. What is your evidence that the government has tried to remove these videos. If the government was smart enough to pull off 9/11, why would they be stupid enough to think they could remove 9/11 from the Internet? The only reason they don't play it on TV so much anymore is because we've all seen it a million times. After a while, people get sick of having to relive the horror of that day.
@y0ssar1an shutup, you reply to my post and all you talk about is one thing i barely mentioned....."what's your evidence?"-easy there sherlock, you seem like all you wanted to do was argue, fuck off
@SuperStreetG So you admit you don't have any evidence that the government tried to remove 9/11 videos from the Internet. Thank you. All you have left is that you don't understand why both towers fell, and why they both fell straight down. Are you a mechanical engineer or a physicist? Do you know how buildings that size should fall? Here's an alternate explanation: both towers fell because massive jumbo jets loaded with fuel crashed into them.
@y0ssar1an no im not a engineer but ive heard from many architects/engineers that the heat required to melt the steel inside the towers would have to be far greater than what jet fuel/incubation inside of the towers could provide, it is my opinion that the media is persuaded by the goverment to not show the occurrence of 9/11, also youtube was consulted by firms in the past to remove 9/11 footage....You really have no business continuing commenting back cuz i know your just a troll
@SuperStreetG The steel didn't have to melt. Steel bends, warps, and loses much of it's strengths at temperatures much lower than its melting temperature.
I have a low intelligence and or a personality disorder and this video speaks volumes to me.
pobody69 2 months ago
ww.youtube.com/watch?v=6XMLfVJCsZY&feature=fvst
SuperStreetG 2 months ago
So our intelligence agencies are the only bureaucracies in the world that are incapable of incompetence and being asleep at the switch. That's his argument.
y0ssar1an 2 months ago
"You'll never convince me the government didn't have advanced knowledge." This is the cry of the zealot. Anybody who says there's no amount of evidence that could convince them of something cannot be taken seriously.
y0ssar1an 2 months ago
why in the world would both the towers fall? Why did they fall straight down? The temperature to make the steel melt couldn't have been that hot to bring the entire thing down? My guess is a Government blew those towers up and they had a bigger reason to go over to Persia than just a hunch on wmd's. They won't even show the twin towers falling anymore on tv and tried to get it taken off the internet many times, the government doesn't want us watching it again cuz it makes us think
SuperStreetG 2 months ago
@SuperStreetG There's roughly a billion sites where you can watch footage from 9/11. What is your evidence that the government has tried to remove these videos. If the government was smart enough to pull off 9/11, why would they be stupid enough to think they could remove 9/11 from the Internet? The only reason they don't play it on TV so much anymore is because we've all seen it a million times. After a while, people get sick of having to relive the horror of that day.
y0ssar1an 2 months ago
@y0ssar1an shutup, you reply to my post and all you talk about is one thing i barely mentioned....."what's your evidence?"-easy there sherlock, you seem like all you wanted to do was argue, fuck off
SuperStreetG 2 months ago
@SuperStreetG So you admit you don't have any evidence that the government tried to remove 9/11 videos from the Internet. Thank you. All you have left is that you don't understand why both towers fell, and why they both fell straight down. Are you a mechanical engineer or a physicist? Do you know how buildings that size should fall? Here's an alternate explanation: both towers fell because massive jumbo jets loaded with fuel crashed into them.
y0ssar1an 2 months ago
@y0ssar1an no im not a engineer but ive heard from many architects/engineers that the heat required to melt the steel inside the towers would have to be far greater than what jet fuel/incubation inside of the towers could provide, it is my opinion that the media is persuaded by the goverment to not show the occurrence of 9/11, also youtube was consulted by firms in the past to remove 9/11 footage....You really have no business continuing commenting back cuz i know your just a troll
SuperStreetG 2 months ago
@SuperStreetG The steel didn't have to melt. Steel bends, warps, and loses much of it's strengths at temperatures much lower than its melting temperature.
y0ssar1an 2 months ago
@SuperStreetG Google 9/11 Myths
y0ssar1an 2 months ago
@MagnusWyvern So does douchebaggery, but this guy seems to be in the right mind.
sonrapper2k4 2 months ago
Ted has got to be one of the bravest people ever born.
unshutoptic1 2 months ago 7