You must have confused me with someone else. I fully believe that the moon landings really happened. A comment that I made one year ago stated that the feather and hammer experiment performed on the moon on live TV proved that they were really there.
Anybody who thinks that the Apollo missions and moon landing were fakes is a complete imbecile.
Most of the so-called "proof" of it being a fake simply boils down to people's ignorance of physics and photography.
Putting men on the moon and bringing them home again is one of the most amazing things that humans have done. Those people who deny it happened are out to make money by selling books, and those who believe these people are simply fools.
anyone who says we faked the moon landings is insulting all those who worked very hard to make the landings possible, the billions of dollars put into making it possible, and the astronauts who have given their lives as a result of the space program. The Apollo missions in my opinion are the greatest achievements of mankind, stop trying to disprove this achievement to make yourself feel knowledgeable and important.
So how is the space program helping us now? Is it putting food on our UN-employed families tables? Is it helping us when we are sick? Curing diseases,or giving families back their homes?
That's not the intention of the space program, humans want to explore the unknown. We want to know were we are from, how we came here. And if there is a reason to all of this. Thing's like that. You can't compare a space program with hunger and diseases.
Things like what? That is the most insane,ridiculous ting I've heard yet! Yes,screw everything "let's explore the unknown,let's space out and forget reality!" GET REAL..Come back down to Earth! Tell me one thing the space program is helping currently,that is all one thing you fool!
("That is the most insane,ridiculous ting I've heard yet!") Yeah, why we have a space program is just aweful, i hear ya....
GOD DAMNIT people are stupid(Mostly referring to you) Yes you want to feed the poor and cure diseases, we do have a lot of organisations that help people who have those illnesses or doesn't have food on their table. So why "Blame" NASA for this? Nasa has provided this world with Info about the universe we could just dream of.
I'll ask you only once more,because you do not seem to get life at all. Why do we continue to spend zillions of dollars for? So you can see beautiful pictures. Taxpayers are paying for this.What good is it doing now?
Why does me having a life or not have anything to do with this? You're just trying to use something you know nothing about against me which is ridicolous. As i said, we may make first contact, we want to know where this planet and this galaxy really comes from. Who are we really? There's alot of BIG questions that can be answered by it.
ESA and NASA are organisations who doesn't do charity, It's a freekin space program! You can't just blame them for no reason!!!
I'm really glad that we have NASA and ESA, the hubble telescope and the upcoming James Webb telescope! I love astronomy so the pictures provided by them is gold to meand MILLIONS of others.
WOW! I thought it was a charity. You are a really diluted individual,who does not know about reality.I figure you must be a teen living at home with mom and dad paying the bills. Enjoy it,reality will come & you will see there is more to life than admiring the beauty at the cost of people losing their homes,& dieing.
And yes i do know about reality, there's an organisation called "Redd Barna" or Save the childs or something, that we give 50 $ to every month. But back to your Nasa conundrom, i just don't think It's right to put NASA into this. Human's have an eager to explore, maybe we can find intelligent life out there. The Drake equation suggests we do, but what if we make first contact this century? Maybe they have technology that can help the poor an the Ill.
And do you really think that hubble takes pictures because they're beautiful..? By looking at hubbles pictures we can analyse what we are looking at, if it is a Quasar or a spiral galaxy, is it a glaxy with a black hole in it. Not just galaxies of course, a lot of objects in space.
If they weren't in the vacuum of the Moon, how did the feather and the hammer fall at the same rate of speed? Newtons Law of gravity. How did they fall at a slower rate of acceleration than they would on the Earth, due to 1/6th Moon gravity, if this was a fake film made on the Earth?
I love this video. Great soundtrack. I wonder if it was hard for you to decide what footage to include since there's so much wonderful Apollo footage, but anyway, good job. I like John Young's jump salute and the emphasis on Dave Scott saying man must explore, and I like the pictures of Gene Kranz because I've read Failure Is Not An Option twice. I have a question about the Moon photograph at 3:00, is that from the Japanese orbiter Kaguya/SELENE?
Cosmored: Did you have to work hard to get this stupid? Is this what you do with yourself, sit on the computer claiming to be a the end all tell all of the apollo missions? Do us all a favor and keep jerking off to redtube so you cant poison the gene pool with your nonsensical ramblings. These landings were an achievement of science and engineering. You on the otherhand represent the septic tank of rational people. I pitty you.
You havent presented any evidence that would suggest that we didnt go. I want peole that were there during the "production" of the landings. You know, stage hands, producers, directors, actors, costume people, and so on. The problem is none of these people are talking bc they werent there. This is the greatest secret in mankind, yet no witness is writing a book. Fuck 19 books came from OJ trial alone,yet no books from apollo "film crew". you have nothing except internet shit. give me hard eviden
@teddysalad65 Nasa are the only criminal liars, and anyone who believes we were on the moon is a human monkey who needs to think outside the box. The NWO loves conformists.
@Cosmored you want to know what's scary we let morons like you vote why do you think Washington's full of crappy politicians and a crap president. If you knew any science which you obviously don't you would know the moon landing was filmed on location science point's against you. So what if it was faked why did we spend hundreds of millions of dollars building a 363 foot tall Saturn V rocket, what to send astronauts up into orbit to twiddle their thumbs for a week a launch can't be faked
Rhetorical posts like yours may sway a fefw people who don't take the time to look at the evidence, but, once people have seen the evidence, there's nothing you can do to make them think they went to the moon.
@FatFreddy88 dude that evidence is pure and simple plain bullshit i looked at the photos there's nothing to conclude the evidence and there is no science to back up your evidence I've seen the photoshop stuff special effects work trying to mimic it on earth it's impossible those men are wearing 75 to 100 pound suit when there in lunar attire some of the moves they make on the moon can only be done on the moon.
@FatFreddy88 The flag moves without anyone touching it. An astronaut passes by very close to it. Most certainly it's because of static electricity created by the nearby moving astronaut. If it had been wind, the flag should have moved even when no astronauts were near. That never happens in any videos i have watched.
certo non è stato progettato per andare sulla luna, però c'è da considerare che non sappiamo esattamente per cosa è stato progettato e i suoi limiti, materiale classificato come ovvio, però a pensarci bene ci starebbe nel vano di carico un modulo di allunaggio?
il serbatoio verrebbe messo in orbita per tempo e agganciato dall'orbiter, chissà non si può mai dire?
mi sono sempre chiesto se uno space shuttle , modificato, e un primo volo di servizio che avesse messo in orbita un modulo di rifornimento, possa arivare sulla luna.
E strano che in tutti questi anni non ci siano tornati?
Di arrivarci può arrivarci... ma il problema è come: innanzitutto ci vuole un'interstadio tipo sIVb per la TLI, in secondo luogo una capsula tipo Command Module e abbastanza spazio per i serbatoi del carburante per rimettersi in traiettoria terrestre una volta raggiunta l'orbita lunare.
Ma è un'ipotesi campata in aria, lo Shuttle non è stato progettato per un lavoro del genere.
...il modulo Apollo costituito dal CM + SM rappresentava lo stato dell'arte aerospaziale dell'epoca, tanto è vero che fu usato anche per le missioni congiunte USA-USSR poco tempo dopo (Apollo-Soyuz).
Sulla luna ci sono andati, ma bisogna dire la verità, o quella più plausibile, le missioni furono ad altissimo rischio si trattava in pratica di un'enorme bomba a scoppio lento la tecnica tedesca si dimostrò la migliore del mondo, considerato che c'erano più di 100.000 parti mobili, Es. pensate se alla partenza un ormeggio non rientrava, difficile direte, ma posibile
Il vettore Saturn V è stato e rimane tutt'ora il razzo più affidabile per ciò che riguarda il lancio di una missione lunare con equipaggio umano (anche perchè fu l'unico, il vettore sovietico si dimostrò inaffidabile per il lancio della soyuz+lunar lander).
Il fatto che fu un'impresa straordinaria è certo, nessuno aveva mai tentato una cosa simile e nessuno, oltre all'USSR avrebbe mai potuto.
La NASA ci riuscì, i Russi persero la motivazione a seguito del successo dell'Apollo.
si dice look at that, considerazione l'affanno e la concitazione , nonostante siano addestratissimi astronauti è comprensibile, non riproducibile in studio, ulteriore riprova delle avvenute missioni
altro uomo a cui l'umanita deve molto è Guglielmo Marconi, anche lui bistrattato come Verner, la frase epica un piccolo passo sembra l'abbia detta per primo marconi durante la prima trasmissione transatlantica 1901 mentre ascoltava la trasmissione morse dall'eruropa, questo è un piccolo gesto perun uomo e un grande passo per l'umanita, bella comunque in entrambi i casi
You must have confused me with someone else. I fully believe that the moon landings really happened. A comment that I made one year ago stated that the feather and hammer experiment performed on the moon on live TV proved that they were really there.
vederchi 1 year ago
Comment removed
vederchi 1 year ago
Comment removed
vederchi 1 year ago
Anybody who thinks that the Apollo missions and moon landing were fakes is a complete imbecile.
Most of the so-called "proof" of it being a fake simply boils down to people's ignorance of physics and photography.
Putting men on the moon and bringing them home again is one of the most amazing things that humans have done. Those people who deny it happened are out to make money by selling books, and those who believe these people are simply fools.
iloveesr 1 year ago
Great to watch!
Rob260259 2 years ago
Man must explore and we will. If we had not we would still be picking berries in Africa. Go Mankind!
AbelMagwitch73 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
freelens1 2 years ago
Comment removed
freelens1 2 years ago
The video is Great! But the song ruins it :P
vebbto 2 years ago
anyone who says we faked the moon landings is insulting all those who worked very hard to make the landings possible, the billions of dollars put into making it possible, and the astronauts who have given their lives as a result of the space program. The Apollo missions in my opinion are the greatest achievements of mankind, stop trying to disprove this achievement to make yourself feel knowledgeable and important.
oneofall213 2 years ago
So how is the space program helping us now? Is it putting food on our UN-employed families tables? Is it helping us when we are sick? Curing diseases,or giving families back their homes?
sloofuss 2 years ago
That's not the intention of the space program, humans want to explore the unknown. We want to know were we are from, how we came here. And if there is a reason to all of this. Thing's like that. You can't compare a space program with hunger and diseases.
vebbto 2 years ago
Things like what? That is the most insane,ridiculous ting I've heard yet! Yes,screw everything "let's explore the unknown,let's space out and forget reality!" GET REAL..Come back down to Earth! Tell me one thing the space program is helping currently,that is all one thing you fool!
sloofuss 2 years ago
("That is the most insane,ridiculous ting I've heard yet!") Yeah, why we have a space program is just aweful, i hear ya....
GOD DAMNIT people are stupid(Mostly referring to you) Yes you want to feed the poor and cure diseases, we do have a lot of organisations that help people who have those illnesses or doesn't have food on their table. So why "Blame" NASA for this? Nasa has provided this world with Info about the universe we could just dream of.
But actually, i rest my case. (ish)
vebbto 2 years ago
Not blaming NASA.
I'll ask you only once more,because you do not seem to get life at all. Why do we continue to spend zillions of dollars for? So you can see beautiful pictures. Taxpayers are paying for this.What good is it doing now?
sloofuss 2 years ago
Why does me having a life or not have anything to do with this? You're just trying to use something you know nothing about against me which is ridicolous. As i said, we may make first contact, we want to know where this planet and this galaxy really comes from. Who are we really? There's alot of BIG questions that can be answered by it.
vebbto 2 years ago
ESA and NASA are organisations who doesn't do charity, It's a freekin space program! You can't just blame them for no reason!!!
I'm really glad that we have NASA and ESA, the hubble telescope and the upcoming James Webb telescope! I love astronomy so the pictures provided by them is gold to meand MILLIONS of others.
vebbto 2 years ago
Is gold to me and *
vebbto 2 years ago
WOW! I thought it was a charity. You are a really diluted individual,who does not know about reality.I figure you must be a teen living at home with mom and dad paying the bills. Enjoy it,reality will come & you will see there is more to life than admiring the beauty at the cost of people losing their homes,& dieing.
sloofuss 2 years ago
Yeah, because that's Nasa's fault!!
And yes i do know about reality, there's an organisation called "Redd Barna" or Save the childs or something, that we give 50 $ to every month. But back to your Nasa conundrom, i just don't think It's right to put NASA into this. Human's have an eager to explore, maybe we can find intelligent life out there. The Drake equation suggests we do, but what if we make first contact this century? Maybe they have technology that can help the poor an the Ill.
vebbto 2 years ago
And do you really think that hubble takes pictures because they're beautiful..? By looking at hubbles pictures we can analyse what we are looking at, if it is a Quasar or a spiral galaxy, is it a glaxy with a black hole in it. Not just galaxies of course, a lot of objects in space.
vebbto 2 years ago
very nice :)
yousefaz08 2 years ago 4
Proof that they were on the Moon:
If they weren't in the vacuum of the Moon, how did the feather and the hammer fall at the same rate of speed? Newtons Law of gravity. How did they fall at a slower rate of acceleration than they would on the Earth, due to 1/6th Moon gravity, if this was a fake film made on the Earth?
You conspiracy guys need to get a life.
vederchi 2 years ago 18
@vederchi this journey to moon is real! PROVEN IN MYTHBUSTERS!
Pharmit24 1 year ago
Really nice tribute. And good music too.
Thanks for uploading.
dopje31857 3 years ago 14
Thanx Laurellestar!
Yes, it's been quite a hard choice to select those images and footages, given the large amount of existent ones.
At 3.00 we can see an animation made with some images from the Hubble telescope.
Bye!
Tuboapollo 3 years ago
I love this video. Great soundtrack. I wonder if it was hard for you to decide what footage to include since there's so much wonderful Apollo footage, but anyway, good job. I like John Young's jump salute and the emphasis on Dave Scott saying man must explore, and I like the pictures of Gene Kranz because I've read Failure Is Not An Option twice. I have a question about the Moon photograph at 3:00, is that from the Japanese orbiter Kaguya/SELENE?
LaurelleStar 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Now that we have the internet everyone can see the evidence that the moon missions were faked. Here's a partial summary of the hoax evidence.
3W's (dot) rushlimbaughforum (dot) com/never-went-the-moon-t2782 (dot) html
(check link for gaps)
I believed they'd really gone to the moon until I saw the evidence.
Cosmored 3 years ago
Yes Cosmored.
The only big evidence I discovered is that mo(r)on hoaxers are a hoax themselves.
Have a nice day.
Tuboapollo 3 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You haven't addressed any of the evidence. What do you think of the way the corner of Collins' jacket behaves at the 50 second mark of this clip?
/watch?v=I_CMgqitv98
"Apollo 11: The TV Transmission Conspiracy Theorists Hate!"
(look for this in YouTube)
This clip shows real zero-G. Look at the corners of the astronaut's jacket.
/watch?v=TejsnPThmd4
"Discovery Crew Enters International Space Station"
The Apollo footage was taken in gravity.
Cosmored 3 years ago
I'm not gonna show you any of the overwhelming evidences that prove the Apollo missions real.
There are a bunch of channels where you can go and talk about moon hoax, i'm not gonna spend time to address avidence to the umpteenth moon hoaxer.
And yes, that video confirms it was filmed in zero g.
Tuboapollo 3 years ago
Explain about the three apollo astronauts that died on launch pad.
axb975 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"Explain about the three apollo astronauts that died on launch pad."
Watch this "YouTube" video. I'm not in a position to know anything for sure but this certainly fits the picture.
/watch?v=ZfYBJFPuiwE
"Thomas Baron and astronauts killed to keep Apollo program"
Cosmored 3 years ago
Cosmored: Did you have to work hard to get this stupid? Is this what you do with yourself, sit on the computer claiming to be a the end all tell all of the apollo missions? Do us all a favor and keep jerking off to redtube so you cant poison the gene pool with your nonsensical ramblings. These landings were an achievement of science and engineering. You on the otherhand represent the septic tank of rational people. I pitty you.
axb975 3 years ago 3
You havent presented any evidence that would suggest that we didnt go. I want peole that were there during the "production" of the landings. You know, stage hands, producers, directors, actors, costume people, and so on. The problem is none of these people are talking bc they werent there. This is the greatest secret in mankind, yet no witness is writing a book. Fuck 19 books came from OJ trial alone,yet no books from apollo "film crew". you have nothing except internet shit. give me hard eviden
axb975 3 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
"You havent presented any evidence that would suggest that we didnt go"
You're playing dumb about what I posted. Here is the same info again in a different place.
s1 (dot) zetaboards (dot) com/LooseChangeForums/topic/51606/1/
s1 (dot) zetaboards (dot) com/LooseChangeForums/single/?p=48603&t=51606
(Check links for gaps)
What you seem to be doing is trying to bury the stuff I post to reduce the number of people who see it. All I can do is keep reposting it.
Cosmored 3 years ago
Hi there Cosmo. Seems the hoax is dead. What about the hoaxtards?
Rob260259 2 years ago
@Cosmored u r not alone.
nrobnas43 1 year ago
@nrobnas43 Hoaxtard Loser.
teddysalad65 1 year ago
@teddysalad65 Nasa are the only criminal liars, and anyone who believes we were on the moon is a human monkey who needs to think outside the box. The NWO loves conformists.
nrobnas43 1 year ago
@Cosmored moron
potatogrower 10 months ago
Comment removed
usmctate 4 months ago
@Cosmored you want to know what's scary we let morons like you vote why do you think Washington's full of crappy politicians and a crap president. If you knew any science which you obviously don't you would know the moon landing was filmed on location science point's against you. So what if it was faked why did we spend hundreds of millions of dollars building a 363 foot tall Saturn V rocket, what to send astronauts up into orbit to twiddle their thumbs for a week a launch can't be faked
usmctate 4 months ago
@usmctate
The evidence that Apollo was faked is crushing. Here's an updated link to the evidence.
spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487
Rhetorical posts like yours may sway a fefw people who don't take the time to look at the evidence, but, once people have seen the evidence, there's nothing you can do to make them think they went to the moon.
FatFreddy88 4 months ago
@FatFreddy88 dude that evidence is pure and simple plain bullshit i looked at the photos there's nothing to conclude the evidence and there is no science to back up your evidence I've seen the photoshop stuff special effects work trying to mimic it on earth it's impossible those men are wearing 75 to 100 pound suit when there in lunar attire some of the moves they make on the moon can only be done on the moon.
usmctate 4 months ago
@usmctate
Do a YouTube search on "Apollo 15 flag waving" and give us your analysis.
FatFreddy88 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FatFreddy88 The flag moves without anyone touching it. An astronaut passes by very close to it. Most certainly it's because of static electricity created by the nearby moving astronaut. If it had been wind, the flag should have moved even when no astronauts were near. That never happens in any videos i have watched.
YDDES 3 days ago...He said it in my words exactly
usmctate 2 months ago
certo non è stato progettato per andare sulla luna, però c'è da considerare che non sappiamo esattamente per cosa è stato progettato e i suoi limiti, materiale classificato come ovvio, però a pensarci bene ci starebbe nel vano di carico un modulo di allunaggio?
il serbatoio verrebbe messo in orbita per tempo e agganciato dall'orbiter, chissà non si può mai dire?
freelens1 3 years ago
mi sono sempre chiesto se uno space shuttle , modificato, e un primo volo di servizio che avesse messo in orbita un modulo di rifornimento, possa arivare sulla luna.
E strano che in tutti questi anni non ci siano tornati?
freelens1 3 years ago
Sulla Luna NO
Vicino alla Luna, magari si.
Di arrivarci può arrivarci... ma il problema è come: innanzitutto ci vuole un'interstadio tipo sIVb per la TLI, in secondo luogo una capsula tipo Command Module e abbastanza spazio per i serbatoi del carburante per rimettersi in traiettoria terrestre una volta raggiunta l'orbita lunare.
Ma è un'ipotesi campata in aria, lo Shuttle non è stato progettato per un lavoro del genere.
Tuboapollo 3 years ago
...il modulo Apollo costituito dal CM + SM rappresentava lo stato dell'arte aerospaziale dell'epoca, tanto è vero che fu usato anche per le missioni congiunte USA-USSR poco tempo dopo (Apollo-Soyuz).
Tuboapollo 3 years ago
Furono missioni ad altissimo rischio, certo.
Ma furono rischi in buonissima parte calcolati e previsti dalle missioni precedenti all'Apollo 11.
Il LEM ad esempio fu testato sia sulla Terra con grande successo, che in orbita bassa durante Apollo 9.
Apollo 8 fece il primo viaggio lunare con equipaggio umano e Apollo 10 mise le basi per l'allunaggio di Armstrong e Aldrin.
Il vettore SV funzionava alla perfezione (come la storia dimostra) il LEM volava benissimo in assenza di atmosfera e...
Tuboapollo 3 years ago
Sulla luna ci sono andati, ma bisogna dire la verità, o quella più plausibile, le missioni furono ad altissimo rischio si trattava in pratica di un'enorme bomba a scoppio lento la tecnica tedesca si dimostrò la migliore del mondo, considerato che c'erano più di 100.000 parti mobili, Es. pensate se alla partenza un ormeggio non rientrava, difficile direte, ma posibile
freelens1 3 years ago
Il vettore Saturn V è stato e rimane tutt'ora il razzo più affidabile per ciò che riguarda il lancio di una missione lunare con equipaggio umano (anche perchè fu l'unico, il vettore sovietico si dimostrò inaffidabile per il lancio della soyuz+lunar lander).
Il fatto che fu un'impresa straordinaria è certo, nessuno aveva mai tentato una cosa simile e nessuno, oltre all'USSR avrebbe mai potuto.
La NASA ci riuscì, i Russi persero la motivazione a seguito del successo dell'Apollo.
Tuboapollo 3 years ago
si dice look at that, considerazione l'affanno e la concitazione , nonostante siano addestratissimi astronauti è comprensibile, non riproducibile in studio, ulteriore riprova delle avvenute missioni
freelens1 3 years ago
roketeer roketeer... beatyfull
freelens1 3 years ago
dice:
-"Don't hit the Lem, or the ALSEP"
-"look at that, look at that, look at that!"
-"Beautiful!!"
Tuboapollo 3 years ago
altro uomo a cui l'umanita deve molto è Guglielmo Marconi, anche lui bistrattato come Verner, la frase epica un piccolo passo sembra l'abbia detta per primo marconi durante la prima trasmissione transatlantica 1901 mentre ascoltava la trasmissione morse dall'eruropa, questo è un piccolo gesto perun uomo e un grande passo per l'umanita, bella comunque in entrambi i casi
freelens1 3 years ago
Un Uomo una statura uno scienziato, werner von braun.
L'umanita deve molto a questo grande uomo ma per i suoi , costretti, trascosi gli venne rifiutato il nobel e molta riconoscenza, ricordiamolo.
freelens1 3 years ago
anch'io c'ero le imagini sono indimenticabili,
freelens1 3 years ago
eh eh... ero piccolo, ma "io c'ero"!
Bel lavoro.
ugom65 3 years ago 2
Complimenti, bella scelta di immagini e anche la colonna sonora è azzeccata.
axlman0 3 years ago 2