Added: 4 years ago
From: josferrari60
Views: 234,685
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (184)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • instead of f40 there should be a buggatti veyron super sport!!!

  • @tayfun366 That would still be destroyed by the F1 car

  • See, that isn't a good comparison...even the F1 Ferrari's are slow. ; )

  • ITS NOT TOP GEAR YOU FAG!!!

  • dang that dude is so ugly, he had to sneak up on it to be able to get in it.

  • LOL @ the way the F40 gets dropped like a bad smell at 14 seconds, when the F1 car uses full power.

  • дрег

  • F40 was already 7 seconds behind the F1 after the first(!) corner... GP2 cars is about 7-9 seconds slower than a F1 in one entire LAP.. . GP3 about 12-13 seconds after a GP2. a GP4 car vs the F40 would been a better comparison!

  • @xismxist This was way before the days of GP2, GP3 and GP4.

  • Lol!! I see alot of clarkson hatred on here!! Funny when they say he can't drive for shot but I bet if you raced him on a track you would lose!! Hahahahah!! & the stufs have all Ben formula 1 drivers of course the drugs are better than Jeremy!! So if the stig is better than jeremy & Jeremy is better than his haters , then his haters must suck real back except for the straight line!!

  • Jeremy Clarkson FTW!!

  • it sounds so amasing, the F1 car!! :)

  • perchè fanno queste stronzate??? è normale che la jordan divora la f40 dopo tutto stiamo parlando di un auto stradale contro una da pista che di sicuro ha 200/300 cv in più della ferrari.............

  • @carlor35 non sono i cavalli che fanno la differenza. dimmi quanto pesano le due macchine, poi ne riparliamo

  • Ferrari F40,the Jeremy Clarckson's preferite car :)

  • No wonder it lost. Clarkson was driving.

  • Those Jordans was the best looking F1 cars in history.

  • chuck norris should've been driving 

  • Clarkson can't drive for shit compared to the Stig. Should've had him running in the F40 instead...

  • @krayzeejojo when this is from a clarkson vhs from at least 10 years ago that wouldn't happen

  • the f11sound is awesome

  • hhmm lets see.... The F1 is Lighter, Faster, More aro dynaminc, Better tires, More Horsepower, Better Driver, Is that everything? :P I still think the ferrari won

  • Yeah that's right, the ferrari was driven by a geezer at work, he sez he's had it a while now, usually takes it in on a friday, does a quick tea bar run in it to keep ticking over. Normally out of his face on the guinness too, but this was him on a good day.

  • well of course an f1 would beat any car in any circuit for crying out loud... it is a FORMULA 1. it even sounds like a freaking f22 raptor screaming on fire.. nice "comparison" nonetheless...

  • V10, V12... What a missed!

  • Ferrari? What Ferrari?

  • ferrari f 4o a lendaria de todos os tempos a melhor mais quere coloca uma fi do lado dae é maldaden nanana...

  • lol, F1 sounds like my dremel.

  • extraño oir esos v12.........

  • @MAXCDE27 El motor que oyes es el Mugen Honda V10

  • lol

  • F1 is F1..... u don't mess with a F1 car on GP track.... Period. 

  • all hail the V10!

  • My friend told me the other day that a Honda could never be faster than a Ferrari. I showed him this. I gotta say I'm like addicted to watching these f1 vs road car videos. So far top gear's are the best. This and the Cougar vs McRae's(rest his soul) Focus vs Herbert's Stewart Ford F1 GP car.

  • there are other things that are like F1 cars in america i dont know what they are called. i think they called champ cars they are faster. but in sharper corners an F1 car has more grip and better aerodynamics and better traction.

  • @sassy2161 Your joking right? A Champ car beating an F1 car? There is simply nothing and I mean NOTHING on wheels that can beat an F1 car. A Champ car is comparing an F1 with a VW beatle....

  • @sassy2161 Champs are shit compared to f1's learn about vehicles before posting clueless coments

  • i think the F1 car driver could have gone EVEN FASTER

  • More horsepower, better traction, much lighter car, about 4k rpm more available. Colin Chapman got it right about drawing speed from less weight but the F1 takes a Caterham 7 and adds about 400hp+ more. Yeah that would be fast, lol.

  • @omga14 what about the F40 against a F3000?

  • The Ferrari must have been exciting....look at his hair!!

  • Watching me make love is like seeing an F1 car go around a track

  • Comment removed

  • @ilikebooty00 Over in seconds? Less than a minute?

  • @AllanFolm its more like a grand prix ;)

  • lol alex fuck chump car f1 so far better then chump car could ever be we could drop another engine size and still beat chump car you wanna watch sum proper racing cars round a track

  • my god f1 car is spectacular!!!

  • F1's can touch 18000rpms :)

  • so wich car won the race

  • i love sound of the engine (F1)

  • F40 is easily the best looking car ever made

  • its the old top gear pre-2002

  • is that the guy off top gear

    or just some random person

    

  • f1 = mind- blowing

  • Hmmm bugati veryon hell no!!!!!!

  • They should've raced the F1 car with a veyron, probably would be a little more succesful, but i don't think u can win against an F1 car on racetrack

  • @Goodtime618 no the MT900 Land Shark is a better comparasion lol

  • pero el rpoblema es el siguiente el formula 1 pesa supongamosle 1000kilos y la ferrari supongamos tambien que pesa 4000 kilos osea es algo ovbio por ahi si la ferrari pesara 2000kilos y algo hace :P

  • @germanyadrian los ferrari de carretera pesan poco mas de 1000 kg, los F1 son sencillamente imbatibles porque los diseñan SOLO para ser lo mas rapidos posible y los coches de carretera tambien miran la comodidad, el equipamiento, espacio interior, el precio, que su motor dure mucho, etc.

  • 'On the street' full of humps and pits in it, a formula one car would certainly have a hard time, xxaxxtoni is right in that perspective, but a Veyron already needs 9,8 seconds to reach only 240 kph, whilst an F1 does 300, in 8,5 seconds (around gravity, 9,81 meters/second square...

  • @Joke9972 The ride hight and spring weight would be adjusted to cope. Monaco works fine and thats a public road. Obviously pot holes would cause problems for a vehicle with such a low road hight but if your racing on those kind of roads then maybe its time to grow up?

  • f1 car looks like it aint even pushing it

  • the good old v10 sound !

  • i LOVE the sound og F1 in the morning! xD

  • @ILikeKiks

    of*

  • lost aginst to a f1 it left him way up back

  • hhhahahah, my god¡¡¡¡¡¡¡

  • miss old v10 engine voices

  • Poor F40 no?

  • Funny how flat jeremys hair is at the end

  • The F-40 would probably go faster without Jeremy Clarkson in it...lol

  • naa

  • Comment removed

  • On second thought The F-1 would probably go slower had Jeremy been in it.

    Because I don't think he would fit into the tight tub(cockpit).

  • Comment removed

  • They were not looking for an answer. They did this to show the public just how much faster an F1 car is than a fast road car. Fuck Ferrari power. McLaren power FTW!!!

  • Everyone knows the f40 is fast. It just shows how ridiculously fast an F1 car is. Its something to compare against.

  • @jamma016er nothing on this earth can compare to a f1

  • @jamma016er Now imagine the Ferrair F1 WOW!

  • Wheres he gone?

    LOL

  • WHAT THE HELL HAPENS WITH HIS HAIR?

  • F40 technically passed by a Honda

  • What Honda? Isn't that a Jordan?

  • Jordan-Honda alright, but you know what, looking a little closer at the video l think l saw the Ford logo on the car. Love it!

  • Ah that depends, if this was pre 1998 Q3 - then its a Peugot... (which I suspect is even worse). I suspect that it is a pre Honda model. Ford logo? Maybe they made some component, as far as I know they were a major player in F1 from 1967 - 2003, with components (engines etc).

  • LOL that is pretty funny huh :P

  • amazing geremy xD

  • epic jeremy...XD

  • F40 looked slow as hell next to that F-1.

  • where's he gone? lol love clarckson

  • to beat an f1 car you have to have atleast 1500hp per ton. only a drag car could beat f1

  • in a straight line that is. When there's only 1 corner in the lap the drag racer is nowhere to be found. But that's with every american car.

  • @pdebie1982 yeah they see a corner and crap themselves. thats the cars then the drivers dont get me started, notice that thier premier open wheeler class is dominated by non americans, go scott dixon (true they dont race on many tracks with many corners but some of the tracks do).

  • Looks very much like our own Martin Brundle's helmet colors in the Jordan too....... Wouldn't be at all surprized though, as he was racing for them at the time........

  • no he wasn`t, that was the 98 season with damon hill and ralph schumacher driving for jordan.

    but martin brundle did a lot of promotional driving for jordan after he finnished driving in f1 so it could very well be him.

  • Its andrew gilbert-scott, the jordan test driver at the time.

  • O dia que a "dalith" Jordan superou a poderosoa Ferrari....Quase se repete em Spa Francorchamps esta cena já que a Force India é a descendente da Jordan (Force India era Spike que era Midland que era MF1 que era a Jordan). Hare Baba!

  • O God, the hair...

  • both beautiiful cars

  • V10 is music for my ears

  • there is no car what can beat a f1 car on the track :-P

  • gp2 is pretty close match

  • @izidor

    yes you' right, but on the street a F1 hasnt got a chance in front of a Bugatty Veyron and a Nissan Skyline GTR 34. there is no F1 who can beat these 2 cars.

  • @xxaxxtoni HAHA F1 would own them anyday, anytime

  • @xismxist

    haha never ;)

  • @xxaxxtoni um..there are many street circuits in the f1 calander. To compare any road going vehicle with the fastest open cockpit racing on the face of this planet is a waste of time. To tell someone that a R34 GTR is faster is retarded. 18'000 RPM anyone?

  • @xxaxxtoni your stupid

  • Comment removed

  • @rc8rsracer good attempt... they may be quick in a staight line, and i love moto gp, but cornering speeds.... no chance mate, the lap times are very very far apart

  • @rc8rsracer There is no way a Moto GP bike is faster around a circuit than an F1. Just for example at Silverstone the bike is about 30 seconds slower.

  • @DrBoyton i know it was an older vid i watched it didnt make sense to me either

  • @DrBoyton That is true 'cauze nothin' can corner like F1 car.

    But Moto Gp bike can be faster than F1 cars in terms of top speed.

    Check out Moto Gp top speed in Catalunya and Silverstone, for example.

    Last year in Muguello Dani pedrosa top speed was 349 KM/h

  • @adyolive Top fuel dragsters are faster accelerating and top speed but theres no such thing as corners for them lol

  • @papertigers426 That's different. We are talkin' about moto gp, a serie that sometimes use the same track as F1 cars.

    By the way, in my opinion, dragster is not even a car, 'cauze for me , a car is a vehicle that accelerate, turn and also brake (normally).

  • @papertigers426 it's only faster because its got a jet engine so it doesn't count

  • @hypersaiyangoku yeah your absolutely right if a nitromethane powered 8000 horsepower v8 is a jet engine...

  • @papertigers426 If a F1 car had jet engine then it's fair game but non of them two are nothing compared to the Land speeeder ^^

  • @adyolive F1 will do 370kph on the monza track.

  • @Don575 Is that right? Thatz not gonna happen.

    The 2004 F1 spec car was the fastest off all time, and i think, it did 365,2km/2 in Monza. But, in nowdays, with V8 and all regulation it is very difficult to reach this speed.

  • @izidor That is TRUE.

  • @izidor I bet a Champ/IRL car could.

  • @alexander1485

    You nuts! this had been proven many times. Champ car/IRL shared many tracks, Montrea, Detroit, even Monterey. Champ car didn't even come close to f1 car. The detroit track was actually straightened (last chicane) to make it easier for champ car when it replaced f1 and it still was far slower.

  • Funny

  • omg that v10, music to my ears.

  • i love f1 sound

  • Agreed.

  • awesome, I like both.....................

  • NICE haha

  • the f1 engine sound totally covered f40

  • A 1000hp race car vs. a 500hp F40 isn't apples to apples.

    The F40 is probably the sexiest and most sought-after cars in world even to this day. If I was "Bill Gates" rich, this would be one of the first cars I'd buy.

  • lol 1000hp they dont have that much no where near.

  • They were nudging 1000bhp through the 2003 and 2004 seasons. That Jordan is probably is easily 750bhp..

  • Its hard to match a production car (even if it's a F40) to a Formula 1 car.A vehicle that has breakneck acceleration and is designed to corner as if it was on rails and btw the F1 sound is like music to my ears.

  • 0:26 !!!!!!  cant get enough of that F1 engine! ferrari got owned

  • tussen de buien door krijgen we regen

    en in het hele land sneeuwval met uitzondering van de antillen

  • sick sounding F1

  • tussen de buien door krijgen we regen

    en in het hele land sneeuwval met uitzondering van de antillen

  • wtf ?

  • OMG there was no way of knowing who was going to be faster before the race

  • No Offense but you must not know much about racing cars.

  • lol you fucking idiot, he's joking

  • HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Hes gone to where the starting point was. LOL

  • Did the F1 shift to 2nd at low RPM to gain better traction?

  • Just like that a Jordan car could be faster than a Ferrari...

  • where is he gone??????? hehe...

  • LOL

    where's he gone?

  • if you want challenge vs F1 take the enzo lol

  • fxx

  • would still get raped by the f1 car, but yes the fxx is an awesome car

  • not even close. F1 cars are in a totally different league from road cars an enzo would get raped by that car

  • I know that man lol, i just say if you want to compare with car series take the most rapidly ferrari the Enzo not the F40 because even an M5 could beat the F40 so a Jordan.

    Of course everyone knows the result

  • Well not everyone you'd be surprised, this IS the internet you know, where idiocy and ignorance know no bounds.

  • First of all this video was obviously filmed years ago before the Enzo was even in development and second there's no way in hell an M5 would beat an F40. M5 = 500hp/4000lbs. F40 = 478hp/2400lbs. The power to weight ratios aren't even close. Not only that but the F40 was designed more for track use than the M5 therefore it's brakes and tires would almost certainly last longer on track so the gap between the two would just grow every lap.

  • yeah and f1 cars could e faster... but sadly there not aloud too in the sport

  • enzo is no challenge for F1 cars. it would look almost exactly the same

  • today it will be interesting F1 vs Veyron

  • that would be very intersting i dont think itd hav a chance but itd deff be closer

  • on straight yes, but todays f1 car are cornering even faster than in the 90s and a veyron still wouldn't beat a 90s Jordan on a full lap. There is nothing on this planet that could match a F1 car

  • yep i said it wouldnt hav a chance, but still closer than this

  • Top speed the Veyron is better, but on a track, the F1 car can just corner like no other car in the world.

  • id pay 2 that race

  • 0:14-0:16 Uhhh i just love that sound

    Jordan and Benetton favorite teams.

  • Makes the F40 look like a civic

  • I think you gave to edit description of this video

    good film of ferrari vs f40 by top gear

    change to

    excellent comparing flim of jordan f1 vs F40 from top gear

  • The F40's quick, Clarkson is sloooooooooow.

  • my favoite f1 car of all has to be that Jordan f1 car. it looks brillant in yellow.

  • I liked the 7up green Jordans

  • Yeesh! The Jordan makes the F40 look ordinary! haha

  • the raceing cars are kwl and they are wicked too and they are really fast and i like them

  • 1995: the year you were born?

  • yeah he's gone ! lol f1's are no joke