I think a Hillary Clinton Presidency could be like a Nixon Presidency...looking back, Nixon as President was actually quite good, but was brought down due to his own secrecy/paranoia/dirty politics, which I think could happen to Hillary. She'd do a lot of good things, but I don't think she'll make it all the way through 8 years without something major imploding her presidency
The CFR is real, whether you want to believe in it or not. I'm not a conspiracy nut, but I know the North American Union is being formed and will be established by a president who is a part of the CFR. That cannot be accepted. Even if I don't agree with everything Ron Paul proposes, he's the only candidate who's not a part of the CFR, who openly opposes the NAU and who funds his campaign on donations from the PEOPLE - not corporate lobbying.
Is Ron Paul perfect? Of course not - he's still a politician. But I honestly don't see any other candidates worth a damn right now, so he's the best we have so far.
Cenk you got Edwards all wrong! Obama is actually to the right of Hillary on many issues - at least I know Hillary for who she is - Obama is trying to run on vagueness. Edwards is the only viable candidate who actually has a backbone and who can actually call himself a "progressive" without shame
won't know unless we vote him in. He's a less bold version of Kucinich, but bold nonetheless; which is why it's so perplexing as to why Dennis implored his voters to give their support to Obama
Geo. H.W. Bush's raising of taxes is heroic ONLY if he really meant "no new taxes" when he originally said it. Personally, I believe he knew full well that he'd have to raise taxes and was saying otherwise simply to get elected, which would make him mendacious and calculating--not heroic.
now that we look back, we were wrong obama is no better than hillary if anything he shows more weakness than hillary
amp1616 2 years ago
I think a Hillary Clinton Presidency could be like a Nixon Presidency...looking back, Nixon as President was actually quite good, but was brought down due to his own secrecy/paranoia/dirty politics, which I think could happen to Hillary. She'd do a lot of good things, but I don't think she'll make it all the way through 8 years without something major imploding her presidency
Zappafan5150 4 years ago 6
You fail to realize they are all in the same boat. All of them are the same and have the same policies and are put there by the same funders.
Why you refuse the see this is beyond me. It doesn't matter what democrat or republican is in there as long as they are put there by BIG MONEY!
STOP BABBLING ABOUT CFR AGENTS!
LayneRoxxx 4 years ago
i'm not a 9-11 truther and i have looked at all of them and ron paul is the only one who speeks the truth.
take a look and you'll see he gets all of his money from the american people.
ahowell71 4 years ago
The CFR is real, whether you want to believe in it or not. I'm not a conspiracy nut, but I know the North American Union is being formed and will be established by a president who is a part of the CFR. That cannot be accepted. Even if I don't agree with everything Ron Paul proposes, he's the only candidate who's not a part of the CFR, who openly opposes the NAU and who funds his campaign on donations from the PEOPLE - not corporate lobbying.
Muaguana 4 years ago
Is Ron Paul perfect? Of course not - he's still a politician. But I honestly don't see any other candidates worth a damn right now, so he's the best we have so far.
Muaguana 4 years ago
Donald Duck for president !!
walesspiritof76 4 years ago 3
HE HIT IT RIGHT THERE!! Exactly! Thanks Cenk! everybody thinks I'm some misogynist when I say "FUCK HILLARY"
lebaneseameer 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fucking cenk claims to be a liberal. but has a boner for george bush!. fucking phoney
IckyThump101 4 years ago
Cenk you got Edwards all wrong! Obama is actually to the right of Hillary on many issues - at least I know Hillary for who she is - Obama is trying to run on vagueness. Edwards is the only viable candidate who actually has a backbone and who can actually call himself a "progressive" without shame
7thStreetSaints 4 years ago 2
yeah but man , just how much do u think things will change ? pollies are generally all the same.
IckyThump101 4 years ago
won't know unless we vote him in. He's a less bold version of Kucinich, but bold nonetheless; which is why it's so perplexing as to why Dennis implored his voters to give their support to Obama
7thStreetSaints 4 years ago
bullshit. i noe , edwards clinton obama . fuck man u dont get any real change unless u vote greens and thats just downright silly
IckyThump101 4 years ago
I think she's just appearing to be tough so people don't call her weak, but i agree with you. Good video!
darksideofthenation 4 years ago
Cenk,
Geo. H.W. Bush's raising of taxes is heroic ONLY if he really meant "no new taxes" when he originally said it. Personally, I believe he knew full well that he'd have to raise taxes and was saying otherwise simply to get elected, which would make him mendacious and calculating--not heroic.
brawnymike 4 years ago
TYPE IN VOTER FRAUD IN NEW HAMPSIRE!!!
ahowell71 4 years ago
It's spelled Hampshire dude.
Visfen 4 years ago
sorry dickhead or is it dick head.
i forget if it's one word or two.
ahowell71 4 years ago
No problem spamming idiot.
Visfen 4 years ago
No.
canucksfan94 4 years ago