Naomi, there is no point trying to reason with Muslims. They have been thick in their skulls through repeated and repeated inbreeding through generations and generations. Presenting scientific evidence is no good convincing Muslims coz they have evolved into Zombies already.
Dont know if I can agree with you on this point. I am proud to say that I converted many of them to atheism. Remember that Muslims are no different than Christians to the degree that they are indoctrinated by their families and culture. They deserve a fair chance to accept reason and logic instead of silliness and superstition. We cannot give up on them. They need people like us the most.
@NaomiChambers Hey Naomi, I hope you are right for the sake of humanity. But my interactions with Muslims causes me to believe that reason can't sway the Muslims. Their beliefs are too strongly entrenched for them to ever consider them to be illogical or downright retrograde. And at the rate the Muslim population is exploding, even as the other regions of the world are declining in population, the future generations of humanity could well end up becoming like in the zombies in horror movies.
From the way these read, do you all hate each other!???-lol I for one thought this video was a competent rebuke- I salute you lady (don't know your name sorry.)
And PS: It's a dead give away when criticisms read with this much tuff bravado...5 dollars says most of you wouldn't have the guts to say these to this lady's face.
Fuck you, you porkistani basted there is no pakistan, pakistan it's part of Afghanistan. This ill breeding culture comes from your hindu ancestor remember and porkistan is not a Muslim country
Your a dirty jew motherfucker then, whose stinking ass used to live under the protection of the Islamic Ottoman empire and Islamic Moorish empire. When your stinking thieving ass was being persecuted and nailed to crosses by European Christians, why did you rat thieving interest banking basted come and live under protection of European Muslim then hay, and get the fuck of the land that's not yours, you live in australia jew you live on native Aborigine land get the fuck off it.
@YUSKHAN laughable tosser....look at all your backward shitholes,,,everything that Islam brought to the world was stolen and that only happened in the fraudulent so called golden era...bye bye
@YUSKHAN Listen Mr. ill breeding / inbreeding was and is strictly banned in north Indian cultures. This tradition of in breeding started amongst converts to Islam as it was allowed by Koran which was based on Arabian culture. Pakistan is not part of Afghanistan and never was. Don't talk crap. Afghanistan only became a country in 1747 for the first time.
@NaomiChambers Not Buddhism, Taoism and Jainism. You have a weak lexicon, as the definition of religion is too vague to start of with. It is wise to say believing in Elohim, the Abrahamic God is stupid, and belittling it with Zeus and Odin and other imaginary dieties. Religions like BUddhism, Taoism and Jainism are atheistic and they correlate with Quantum Theory. Richard Dawkins even condoned those types of non-theistic religions in his book called "The God Delusion".
I wouldn't go so far as to say "Islam is harmful to humanity". I think a more accurate statement would be "Refusal to growth and change is harmful to humanity". Because, really, it is not Imran's insistence on praying five times a day that threatens to destroy his people; it their unwillingness to give up their tradition of consanguine cousin marriages that is killing them.
Pleease don't misunderstand me, because I'm concerned and sincere: what about banning smoking, and other drug use, like alcohol (to a certain degree)... or other stuff that's also not 'good for the child'.
What about sterilizing severely mentally handicapped (what ever the proper term is) or down-syndrome people.
In a way I'm open to eugenics, which this might be considered to be too, I think... but how, and why?
Btw... Anthropology IS a science... are you trying to increase physics envy?
But as soon as you say: Anthropology isn't a science, you really do say: "Anthropology is not a science".
If you mean to say: Anthropology isn't a beta-science, then you should really say: "Anthropology is not a beta-science", because if you do not, you do say something else.
"Incest is okay" does not equal: "Incest is okay, in his point of view", that are two completely different things.
Pleease don't misunderstand me, because I'm concerned and sincere: what about banning smoking, and other drug use, like alcohol (to a certain degree)... or other stuff that's also not 'good for the child'.
What about sterilizing severely mentally handicapped people (what ever the proper term is), or down-syndrome people.
In a way I'm open to eugenics, which this might be considered to be too, I think... but how, and why?
Murderous thieves & lairs that use sex as a weapon & religion as a scapegoat into a world of self excuses for their own actions & political gain know no other way too pretend the rest of their inflated lives that they did something good by using laws to justify their involvement in the process of wasting resources. It's unsustainable & the legislation of sex has failed everyone in the process. End Sex Laws Now 4 world peace. Most through pea bargains are railroading by legalized theft & lies.
Wow. I can't believe we actually have to have this argument with progressives. You see, that's whats so frustrating; progressives aren't really 'progressive', they are 'regressive'.
What exactly are you asking me? Are you saying that Muslim's are under-represented among the worlds intellectuals, scientists, inventors according to their alleged population?
If that was your question, you are right. They are under represented - severely.
You may enjoy my three videos on Human Development. I tackle some of those issues.
I do not think Muslims have a low IQ. I think that children who come from consanguineous families are more likely to have a slightly lower IQ.
This is also true for the Gypsies in Europe. They also marry their cousins. IQ tests have proven that they definitely have a lower intelligence level than non-Gypsies.
Muslims who parents are of no relation are not different than the rest of us.
Very good video and background research for speaking to the reality that first-cousin marriages are truly just a promotion of incest. Not to mentino all the problems that happen genetically with that physical action and th repeated action of doing again and again after generations. The Pakistan area has some homogentiy to its genetics thanks to that and most people do not immigrate there. This is an interesting contrast to Iceland that has a very homogeneous, but really no cousin marriages.
and also islam is not harmful to society. i am a young muslim who has lived in britain all my life and i have been influenced by islam greatly in my way of life. yet i see eye to eye with your opinion on causin marraiges. it is not islam that says marry your causin. it is back dated cultural people that still keep eastern mentality alive, e.g. causin marraiges, young marraiges, rituals, etc. theres is a clear difference between culture and islam. i feel you have been confused by the two here.
Islam is harmful to society. Islam is VERY harmful to society.
Islamic nations proves this point. They are under educated, many people live in poverty, many of them cannot even read. They are far behind non Muslim nations.
The fact is - Islam hinders growth, development, and progress.
That is the reality. It is best to deal with the problem rather than denying it exists.
I must say you are quite an idiot. All of those Islamic nations were former colonies just 50 years ago as a result literacy rates are low and so is everything else. Very few former colonial countries(s korea, singapore, malaysia) have developed.
A very good example would be Muslims in America who have higher average income, higher than average DEGREES, 1 in 10 Muslim is a doctor, 1 in 8 is an engineer.
1. You do not make a point by insulting a person. Calling me an 'idiot' only distracts from the point you wish to make. It makes you look stupid, not me.
So, if you would like to make a point that you would like others to listen to... you will first apologize to me.
@Xzibillionaire What have low literacy rates to do with being a former colony? I don't get the connection. The Rep. of Ireland is a former colony and displays an admirable degree of literacy. Also, in that country, cousin marriage is most definitely frowned upon. I'm not saying one necessarily follows the other, but I believe that there's more of a connection between these two facts than there is between low literacy levels and former occupation by another country.
@scram92 Also Poland; another country with a high level of all-round education. It's also a quite recent member of the former-colony club. By the way, it also has an aversion to cousin marriage. There's a saying - " A belief is like a tree. Give it a good shake; if it stays up, it's a good tree." Your tree is looking decidedly shaky.
You forgot that I said "very few former colony countries have progressed" .
Ireland, Poland are exceptions not to mention that they have white privilege if you know what I mean. Also those countries r surrounded by colonial masters who were already rich and it was a matter of time they would get the share.
Also cousin marriage is as dangerous as an older women having a child. Im not defending cousin marriage but given the circumstance we might as well ban older women having children.
@Deyabil "Not to mention they have white privilege, if you know what I mean." - No, I don't know what you mean. Why don't you tell me. So now low literacy rates in islamic countries are because the inhabitants are not white? This is what differentiates them from the populations of both Ireland and Poland? Okay, let's add some more former colonies with excellent rates of literacy:- Mongolia, Cuba, Guyana, Bermuda, Monserrat, Grenada... Shake, shake, shake.
Cousin marriage is just as dangerous as older women having children? Cousin marriage is FAR more common occurrence than older women having children.
In parts of the Middle East, the rate of consanguinity is very high. This means both young AND older women are having children with their first cousins.
Older women are far less likely to procreate. Consanguineous marriages tend to produce MANY children.
i have no issue with what you have said about causin marraiges, but i have an issue with you claiming that imran defended this to defend his religion. Islam does not say you have to marry your causin. you say you will block people who have not read the articles, you should read up on Islam before making constant statements about Islam infesting peoples minds, it is not islam. it is culture not islam. so can you not attack the religion in this way.
You know its not just so black and white when it comes to genetics. Yes, you might be promoting hereditary diseases because you are so closely related, but you can also be hitting genetic lottery by promoting advantageous genes. Its a two sided coin. On top of this, if we restict people having children solely due to the probability of the genetic inferiority of the children, you would be pandering to eugenics. Welcome GATACA
If you go to the video description box of this video, you will find a list of peer reviewed articles published in science journals. The authors are from all over the world.
These articles all say that there is a cumulative disadvantage to inbreeding.
If, however, you have read peer reviewed essays which prove with evidence there may be an advantage, feel free to e-mail it to me. I would love to read it because it will be the first one I have ever seen.
Look, I am going to treat you like an adult here and am going to figure you as someone who understand biology. Do you really need a peer reviewed article to understand how genes are dolled out? Its a very simple equation and I can give it to you. I by no means said that there isn't an probability or increased chance of promotion of detrimental genes, but you would also be promoting the positive ones as well. My point is that it is not as black and white as you make it.
Yes, Your video is about peer reviewed articles, but I am trying to engage you with an anactual dicussion here past that and into the implications of what your video is promotion. So far you have politely evaded from the points I have been making by just pointing me to the peer reviewed articles that dont answer what I was saying to you.
Actually, the peer reviewed articles is what this video is about. After you have read the articles, your opinions should be seriously considered. I personally think that you have not read the articles.
@NaomiChambers And I am telling you I have and my opinion stands. So you are either in denial or you dont want to engage me at all. Just because I have read the articles and have not come to the conclusion you have gives me the impression you dont care for actual discussion. So, good day.
You read each of the peer reviewed articles? Really?
I do not believe you. I think you are lying about having read them all. You need to have access to certain data bases in order to get many of these articles. I am curious how you got access to all of them, and had the time to read hundreds of pages of documents. Many of the papers are highly technical.
If I made a pop quiz on all those articles, I am sure you would fail.
You know some people can actually read and ontop of that have a credit card to buy the articles you submit. Its laughable that you actually tell people to read them and then when they have done so, call them a liar. Your whole "go read these articles" is just a rouse to keep from having an actual discussion. Then when that does not work.. you block. Welldone on being intellectually dishonest.
This is Totaltwist by the way, the one who has read the articles and have declared a liar. But I cannot use that channel to comment and actually defend myself, atleast publically, because you blocked me.
Because you are a liar. Those articles are very hard to get, and they are very hard to read. You would have to be a very intelligent person to have read them, and understood them.
With that, it is pretty clear you are lying
You are blocked until you prove that you read them.
@NaomiChambers Its easy Naomi. I read them before I responded to you. You my dear just dont like looking like a malicious cow. Yes, I actually bothered to do that. And you are just blocking me, avoiding me because if you actually had the balls to discuss anything with me you afraid I have. If I hadn't, like you claim, I would be the one made the fool of simply by how the conversation was being held. If I had, then that would also would be apparent. Instead, you call me a liar and block me. hmmm
@genesisartno By the way, see how nice I have been by not blocking you at all on any of my channels, evident by the fact you could post on my totaltwist channel? And not deleting the post you made on my totaltwist chanel? Its because I am an adult and have nothing to hide.
@genesisartno Also, just to show your adhoms are just you being malicious and without justice, I graduated highschool when I was 16. :) I can show you both my birth certificate and my diploma at the same time. I also took AP Biology when I was 15. Just saying.
@NephilimStar By the way the word you were looking for is RUSE - rouse means to wake someone up, or to wake up from sleep - wow you're really smart XD XD
@NaomiChambers I would also like to point out that when you argue against the breeding of a particular pair of people because of an elivated outcome, you pander to eugenics. For instance two people who carry the recesive gene for Down syndrom will have a higher chance of producing a down syndrom child(closely related or not). Or even in the case of dominant detrimental genes like Marfans or hutchinson's where all you need is one parent for the child to have it.
Please let me know when you finished reading all the peer reviewed articles, written by the professionals whom study the harmful effects of inbreeding.
After you completed your reading (which I read all these articles in order to make this video) I would be more than willing to hear your ideas on the matter
@Totaltwist OMG there is no recessive gene for down syndrome, you're really stupid - besides, eugenics is something they need to spend more time on. I was raised in a poor neglectful household (NO inbreeding) and my grandfather and mother both had extremely high IQ's and so do I - IQ IS an inheritable trait anyway.
@Totaltwist good then you pay for all the retarded, crippled, blind, deaf offspring they create you twat - give one example of a genetics lottery from inbreeding, just one. Of course considering the pseudomale hermaphrodism spreading in palestine, targeting specific neighborhoods & all the hideous defects in england from the pakistani's, I can see you haven't done a piece of real research, shut the fuck up, it is NOT a two sided coin GOD you're stupid
Hi i am not married, but live with a bangladeshi family, they all married cousins, thats 3 couples with 3 childrens each and not one of them are disable, infact they are all ahead of their class, humans are born with defects and thats not anyones choice but gods i also know a few more familys similar to them with no defects i think if you look for a needle in a hay stack you will eventully find it, and also people are born disable regardless maybe the numbers are one in every 20 family.
@NaomiChambers Hi i just wanted to say that they are not all muslims, Tamil people are hindu and they marry cousins, people from india are also hindu and marry cousins, i do understand that it may be more popular in pakistan.
@NaomiChambers It's a cultural imperative for many Asians, with a response to warnings that is equivalent to a shrug of the shoulders. If a couple insist on having children with their cousins then, in my opinion, they should be required to pay for all subsequent health service needs for those children.
Let me know once you finished reading the articles listed in the video description box. They discuss many of this issues you raise, and the issues presented in this video.
This video is about the peer reviewed articles published by numerous science journals, written by both Muslims and non Muslims.
Please read the articles before you continue posting comments
YOU CAN STOP LYING.... THE SO CALLED ROYALTY HAS BEEN PRACTICING INCEST FOR EONS. IT IS THE KEY TO ETERNAL LIFE IN THIS WORLD OF COURSE COUPLED WITH NOT WORSHIPPING ANYTHING AND NOT MAKING A SLAVE OF ANOTHER HUMAN BEING.
INCEST IS HOW THE BLOODLINE IS KEPT PURE.
THE ONLY WAY THE HERMAPHRODITE GENE IS PASSED IS THROUGH INCEST.
IF YOU DO NOT DO THE INCEST YOU WILL DIE.
DEATH IS ETERNITY INSIDE THE SUN, HELL, THE EVER BURNING BLAZING LAKE OF FIRE THE WITH GOD, WHO IS THE DEVIL
I think that making babies with your sister or first cousin is wrong because of the effects on children, BUT sex without reproduction is fine. I have sex with my sister, but use a condom. It's our decision.
@NAOMICHAMBERS-IF A PERSON WALKS PAST A MAN SEX ASSAULTIN G A CHILD/TEEN MOST PEOPLE WILL PROTECT THEIR OWN COMFORT RATHER THAN RISKING THEMSELVES TO STOP CRIMINAL- CRIMINALS SAY THEIR ARE ADDICTS AND WANT OTHERS TO STOP THEM-WE BLAME LAW FOR INSANITY SOCIETY-HOW CAN 1 POLICE CONTROL 400 MEN?LOOK UP WOMENS SHELTERS ON % OF MEN WHO ADMIT BEING VIOLET OR RAPISTS-AND HUNDREDS OF VICTIMS EACH OFFENDER-IF WE DONT LIKE A SITUATION WHAT CAN WE DO THATS EFFECTIVE? WHAT DID IROQUOIS WOMEN DO?SEE MARK9;42
1)Well I know more about dogs than I do people, and dogs with pedigree are examples of the extremes achieved with inbreeding (very small gene pools). In their case the effects are quite clear on their intelligence and psychology, not to mention chances for inherited genetic diseases which go through the roof.
2)Intelligence-wise it the outcomes vary between breeds. Comparing dogs to people is not of much use in the specifics of critical thinking and reading comprehension skills obviously, but the general intelligence of different breeds varies tremendously within the species. It's all down to probabilities, not genetic deterioration as some people think.
3)The big problem is when stupid breeds with stupid, the probability for stupid to be born is high and once that happens it can take a few generations of "de-inbreeding" to get out of. Intelligence is a simpler facet of genetic/biological inheritance IMO, and is not as problematic as the psychological implications of inbreeding (in the case of neuroses, psychosis, personality disorders etc) and the chance for inherited disease. Those two are more serious IMO.
Thank you for the comments. I think you will be interested in my book when I finish it. I discuss the problem of consanguineous marriages, including many arguments for or against them.
Argument from Libertarianism and Argument from Eugenics seem to be where you are.
4.1)I think the topic is interesting and the problems you bring up are real and important, that’s for sure.
Going off topic here, liberal eugenics (in the broad sense of the word) is more or less the ideology I would most identify myself with, though it's an ideology that can quickly and easily turn into something nasty. I don’t like the word “eugenics”, though, it’s has too many negative connotations and conjures images of violation.
4.2)I think that to some degree genetic screening and elimination of harmful genes is a good thing, but the main problem with this is firstly defining which genes and traits are harmful and limiting to those genes. I wouldn't be at ease tampering with genes that affect intelligence, personality or whatever might be considered that “essence” of people but I’m all for correcting things such as diabetes, genetic propensity for cancer, Alzheimer’s
cont... degenerative diseases etc. and those sorts of things (assuming it’s that simple), focusing more on individual improvement and welfare rather than what’s better for and improving the human race as a whole. I think that’s not the case, so I wouldn’t call it eugenics but rather ‘genetic diagnosing’ followed by ‘treatment’ and not eugenics ;)
My Parents are cousin and I am their 4th Child, We are all PERFECTY fine ... All of my siblings went to college, finished school and have high paying jobs .. again .. OUR PARENTS ARE COUSINS !! >>> I am a professional soccer player and again MY PARENTS ARE COUSINS !!! ............I Am FIne .... ihjnpsodiavcnsdaocvin sd[ij HELLOWWWNIOsdvdsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
They will think it is okay no matter what. With some people, it is best to say..."consanguinity" or sex with someone who shares 12.5 percent of one's DNA.
I think that if they do not want to call it 'incest', it does not really matter. The fact is, they are procreating with someone who shares their DNA. In the end - that is what is going to matter
If you have sex with someone who shares 12.5 percent of your dna, you won't have any children, that's bestiality. Even 98 percent would be bestiality, having sexual intercourse with a chimpanzee. I don't think that's what you meant though, but I get what you mean lol.
That is incorrect. First Cousins share 12.5 percent of their DNA. First Cousins have children all the time.
Bestiality is when one has sex with animals. As long as a person has sex with another human being: be it cousin, brother or sister - it is incest, not bestiality
And... the LOL is not necessary. There is nothing amusing about incest. There is nothing amusing, that we should laugh about, when children are born sick.
I wasn't laughing about incest. I was laughing about the mistake you made. If I am wrong, then I will lol about the mistake I made. No need to get snippy
You share 50 percent of your DNA with your mom. You share 50 percent of your DNA with your dad. Depending on whether your sibling are half or full, you also share a significant amount of DNA with our brothers and sisters.
All humans share about 12.5 percent of their DNA with their first cousins. You share about 25 percent of DNA with your aunts and uncles.
The u.s but I was just watching a special about the problem on incest in the u.s (which is how I was linked to this video). During the portion Of the video with map highlighting Islamic nations ( which you say has a problem of incest). You highlighted India which is primarily Hindu, you also even highlighted areas with high concentrations of Christian populations.
I am in no way supporting incest, I myself am aetheist. But, I don't think you should single out on religion like that.
I do single out Islam. There is no denying that. Although Hindu's, Christians, and Jews have practiced cousin marriage - the rate to which Muslims do it is exponential.
Most consanguineous marriages are in Muslim families.
In some cultures, the benefit of cousin marriages outweighs their obvious deficits. It seems like you are very passionate about this topic. However, quite obviously, Imran's comment is both right and wrong depending on the context it is interpreted.
The benefits are only economical. The long term consequences outweigh any temporary benefits.
The topic was actually part of my book.
The context is only withing the realm of biology. In the context of biology, there is nothing beneficial about cousin marriage. It is like playing Russian Roulette with the child's health and life... all for an economical benefit.
You hit it right on the head when you explained HOW his religion has affected his ability to LOOK at facts which contradict the tales in his religious book !!
I am sorry Naomi, the ONLY way you can convince HIM is, if you show that SOME verse in THE 'correct translation' of quran.. says that cousin marriage is BAD :)
People like you do not like it when we focus on Islam, therefore, what you will try to do is convince us to divert our attention away from Islam and focus on another group.
I am only interested in certain corrupt things Jews do in NYC.
But - my topic is Islam. That is my choice. And you will have to deal with it.
@NaomiChambers You know that's very interesting.. you can really get a lot of material for writing a book from interactions here on Youtube..
On a related note.. I'd like to challenge you on the topic of atheism.. I completely agree with you that the idea of "God" is not even valid.. because over the years we have lost touch with the Understanding that the Ancients had based on their experience of reality which was pure and complete unlike ours today which is a copy of a copy of a copy..
@NaomiChambers I would argue that in the very beginning of Creation there was a primordial substance, some kind of Infinite Energy, from which all the physical dimensions and energetic dimensions unfolded from.. There has to be, because something can not come from nothing, unless that No-Thing is the Source of All Things itself. Modern science cannot answer the simple question "Where did the big bang come from?"
@NaomiChambers In Hinduism they say that in the very beginning was "I AM", and from that Awareness came everything, seeing as that Awareness can never begin randomly as a result of chance, because the odds of that happening are not only astronomical or improbable they are impossible. There can never be a highly refined system of reality and evolution which arose from a floppy bunch of physical stuff banging around. Where did Law come from in your opinion? The Laws of Physics etc.? It's a valid Q
This has been flagged as spam show
Naomi, there is no point trying to reason with Muslims. They have been thick in their skulls through repeated and repeated inbreeding through generations and generations. Presenting scientific evidence is no good convincing Muslims coz they have evolved into Zombies already.
XXXFreeSpirit 5 months ago
Comment removed
XXXFreeSpirit 5 months ago
@XXXFreeSpirit
Dont know if I can agree with you on this point. I am proud to say that I converted many of them to atheism. Remember that Muslims are no different than Christians to the degree that they are indoctrinated by their families and culture. They deserve a fair chance to accept reason and logic instead of silliness and superstition. We cannot give up on them. They need people like us the most.
NaomiChambers 5 months ago
@NaomiChambers Hey Naomi, I hope you are right for the sake of humanity. But my interactions with Muslims causes me to believe that reason can't sway the Muslims. Their beliefs are too strongly entrenched for them to ever consider them to be illogical or downright retrograde. And at the rate the Muslim population is exploding, even as the other regions of the world are declining in population, the future generations of humanity could well end up becoming like in the zombies in horror movies.
XXXFreeSpirit 5 months ago
@NaomiChambers Still keep up the good work. Even if you change the mind of a few Muslims, that will be a great accomplishment. Cheers!!
XXXFreeSpirit 5 months ago
God bless Muslims for taking us backwards down the evolutionary scale.
XXXFreeSpirit 5 months ago
just let consenting adults do want ever they want with eachother
trey4439 6 months ago
@trey4439
i am totally fine with that.... so long as they pay all medical expenses for their children and do not ask society for one cent
NaomiChambers 6 months ago
From the way these read, do you all hate each other!???-lol I for one thought this video was a competent rebuke- I salute you lady (don't know your name sorry.)
And PS: It's a dead give away when criticisms read with this much tuff bravado...5 dollars says most of you wouldn't have the guts to say these to this lady's face.
jacknicolsonforcast 9 months ago
you are both wrong,pakistan belongs to the jewish people.G-D gave it to us.
kaptainbastard 9 months ago
Pakistan is not a Muslim country
YUSKHAN 10 months ago
@YUSKHAN
yes it is
NaomiChambers 10 months ago
@NaomiChambers
Have you been there
YUSKHAN 10 months ago
@YUSKHAN
yes, I have
and they are all muslims
NaomiChambers 10 months ago
@YUSKHAN what the fuck....and you have been there and didn't notice
lyntonio 9 months ago
@lyntonio
Fuck you, you porkistani basted there is no pakistan, pakistan it's part of Afghanistan. This ill breeding culture comes from your hindu ancestor remember and porkistan is not a Muslim country
YUSKHAN 9 months ago
@YUSKHAN Um...Pakistan was a part of India...not Afghanistan! They have TOTALLY different cultures, languages, and even features!
KpopManiacSFL 9 months ago
@YUSKHAN you must be Muslim, the abuse flows freely along with the ignorance, I'm Australian and not Hindu or a Paki
lyntonio 9 months ago
@lyntonio
Your a dirty jew motherfucker then, whose stinking ass used to live under the protection of the Islamic Ottoman empire and Islamic Moorish empire. When your stinking thieving ass was being persecuted and nailed to crosses by European Christians, why did you rat thieving interest banking basted come and live under protection of European Muslim then hay, and get the fuck of the land that's not yours, you live in australia jew you live on native Aborigine land get the fuck off it.
YUSKHAN 9 months ago
@YUSKHAN
I am blocking you because you called him a ¨Dirty Jew¨. That is completely unacceptable. No person has the right to call you a ¨Dirty Muslim¨.
Name calling is the most primitive form of argumentation. Name calling is what children do. Name calling is what ignorant people do.
NaomiChambers 9 months ago
@YUSKHAN laughable tosser....look at all your backward shitholes,,,everything that Islam brought to the world was stolen and that only happened in the fraudulent so called golden era...bye bye
lyntonio 9 months ago
@YUSKHAN Listen Mr. ill breeding / inbreeding was and is strictly banned in north Indian cultures. This tradition of in breeding started amongst converts to Islam as it was allowed by Koran which was based on Arabian culture. Pakistan is not part of Afghanistan and never was. Don't talk crap. Afghanistan only became a country in 1747 for the first time.
amanuk99 7 months ago
Prophet Muhammad encouraged familial marriage initiations amongst people of similar financial and / or social calibre of people
and
he discouraged direct marriages between first second and / or cousins
he even discouraged marriages between a couple both of whom were suckled by the same wet nurse
so thats how much inbreeding is discouraged in ISLAM
Muslims should be ashamed for defending stupid innovations in ISLAM
this stupidity of Muslims has nothing to do with the word of GOD
zeb120 10 months ago
@zeb120
Muhammad was not a prophet, he was a crazy man.
And your argument negates the fact that all the sick babies are mostly born to Muslim parents.
NaomiChambers 10 months ago
@NaomiChambers
Hi
I think I covered all of the facts surrounding the controversy.
It is a stupidity of Muslims not ISLAM
Secondly you are in need of anger management.
You have no right to call a man who passed away 14 centuries ago , mad and crazy.
Did you meet him?
Did you have a conversation with him?
You are only fit to argue with people like Imran
Goodbye
zeb120 10 months ago
@zeb120
It is the stupidity of ISLAM. But not just Islam, the Bible and Torah are stupid too for condoning incest.
All religions are for people who are too lazy to think critically
Goodbye
NaomiChambers 10 months ago
@NaomiChambers Not Buddhism, Taoism and Jainism. You have a weak lexicon, as the definition of religion is too vague to start of with. It is wise to say believing in Elohim, the Abrahamic God is stupid, and belittling it with Zeus and Odin and other imaginary dieties. Religions like BUddhism, Taoism and Jainism are atheistic and they correlate with Quantum Theory. Richard Dawkins even condoned those types of non-theistic religions in his book called "The God Delusion".
papasmurfXXX 10 months ago
I wouldn't go so far as to say "Islam is harmful to humanity". I think a more accurate statement would be "Refusal to growth and change is harmful to humanity". Because, really, it is not Imran's insistence on praying five times a day that threatens to destroy his people; it their unwillingness to give up their tradition of consanguine cousin marriages that is killing them.
glocktwentyseven 10 months ago
@glocktwentyseven
You think Islam is good for humanity? You feel that humanity is better off because this religion exists?
NaomiChambers 10 months ago
this is bullshit im sorry
chainlove1 11 months ago
@chainlove1
All those sick babies are bullshit? Why are you sorry for that?
NaomiChambers 11 months ago
Pleease don't misunderstand me, because I'm concerned and sincere: what about banning smoking, and other drug use, like alcohol (to a certain degree)... or other stuff that's also not 'good for the child'.
What about sterilizing severely mentally handicapped (what ever the proper term is) or down-syndrome people.
In a way I'm open to eugenics, which this might be considered to be too, I think... but how, and why?
Btw... Anthropology IS a science... are you trying to increase physics envy?
daddyleon 1 year ago
@daddyleon
Anthropology is a science. But the person he was referring to practiced the Social Science of Anthropology.
This video is not concerned with social science. This video is concerned with Biology and Only Biology
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers Okay, I understand.
But as soon as you say: Anthropology isn't a science, you really do say: "Anthropology is not a science".
If you mean to say: Anthropology isn't a beta-science, then you should really say: "Anthropology is not a beta-science", because if you do not, you do say something else.
"Incest is okay" does not equal: "Incest is okay, in his point of view", that are two completely different things.
daddyleon 1 year ago
Pleease don't misunderstand me, because I'm concerned and sincere: what about banning smoking, and other drug use, like alcohol (to a certain degree)... or other stuff that's also not 'good for the child'.
What about sterilizing severely mentally handicapped people (what ever the proper term is), or down-syndrome people.
In a way I'm open to eugenics, which this might be considered to be too, I think... but how, and why?
daddyleon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Murderous thieves & lairs that use sex as a weapon & religion as a scapegoat into a world of self excuses for their own actions & political gain know no other way too pretend the rest of their inflated lives that they did something good by using laws to justify their involvement in the process of wasting resources. It's unsustainable & the legislation of sex has failed everyone in the process. End Sex Laws Now 4 world peace. Most through pea bargains are railroading by legalized theft & lies.
Keither9 1 year ago
Wow. I can't believe we actually have to have this argument with progressives. You see, that's whats so frustrating; progressives aren't really 'progressive', they are 'regressive'.
specificgravity 1 year ago
this explains why some muslims behave the way they do
snizzlefrazzy 1 year ago
@dovvn4whatever
Because you are presuming that all Muslims have a low IQ. This is wrong.
I have known many, many intelligent Muslims.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers but most are dumb
FIGHTFANNERD3 11 months ago
@dovvn4whatever
incest does predispose some children to having a lower IQ, yes
But we should refrain ourselves from making any unfair generalizations about their intelligence level because they are Muslims.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@dovvn4whatever
What exactly are you asking me? Are you saying that Muslim's are under-represented among the worlds intellectuals, scientists, inventors according to their alleged population?
If that was your question, you are right. They are under represented - severely.
You may enjoy my three videos on Human Development. I tackle some of those issues.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@dovvn4whatever
I do not think Muslims have a low IQ. I think that children who come from consanguineous families are more likely to have a slightly lower IQ.
This is also true for the Gypsies in Europe. They also marry their cousins. IQ tests have proven that they definitely have a lower intelligence level than non-Gypsies.
Muslims who parents are of no relation are not different than the rest of us.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
If one looks at it, we are all inter-related in one way or another.
AnitaByronofSL 1 year ago
@AnitaByronofSL Not that closely ;-P
mmedefarge 1 year ago
Very good video and background research for speaking to the reality that first-cousin marriages are truly just a promotion of incest. Not to mentino all the problems that happen genetically with that physical action and th repeated action of doing again and again after generations. The Pakistan area has some homogentiy to its genetics thanks to that and most people do not immigrate there. This is an interesting contrast to Iceland that has a very homogeneous, but really no cousin marriages.
WordsInAction465 1 year ago
first cousin marriages are against the law in the U.S. in all but about 3 states.
PaleBunnySkinForLife 1 year ago
and also islam is not harmful to society. i am a young muslim who has lived in britain all my life and i have been influenced by islam greatly in my way of life. yet i see eye to eye with your opinion on causin marraiges. it is not islam that says marry your causin. it is back dated cultural people that still keep eastern mentality alive, e.g. causin marraiges, young marraiges, rituals, etc. theres is a clear difference between culture and islam. i feel you have been confused by the two here.
jowardhar 1 year ago
@jowardhar
Islam is harmful to society. Islam is VERY harmful to society.
Islamic nations proves this point. They are under educated, many people live in poverty, many of them cannot even read. They are far behind non Muslim nations.
The fact is - Islam hinders growth, development, and progress.
That is the reality. It is best to deal with the problem rather than denying it exists.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers
I must say you are quite an idiot. All of those Islamic nations were former colonies just 50 years ago as a result literacy rates are low and so is everything else. Very few former colonial countries(s korea, singapore, malaysia) have developed.
A very good example would be Muslims in America who have higher average income, higher than average DEGREES, 1 in 10 Muslim is a doctor, 1 in 8 is an engineer.
Proof (Cornell university):-
allied-media. com/AM/
Xzibillionaire 1 year ago
@Xzibillionaire
1. You do not make a point by insulting a person. Calling me an 'idiot' only distracts from the point you wish to make. It makes you look stupid, not me.
So, if you would like to make a point that you would like others to listen to... you will first apologize to me.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@Xzibillionaire What have low literacy rates to do with being a former colony? I don't get the connection. The Rep. of Ireland is a former colony and displays an admirable degree of literacy. Also, in that country, cousin marriage is most definitely frowned upon. I'm not saying one necessarily follows the other, but I believe that there's more of a connection between these two facts than there is between low literacy levels and former occupation by another country.
scram92 1 year ago
@scram92 Also Poland; another country with a high level of all-round education. It's also a quite recent member of the former-colony club. By the way, it also has an aversion to cousin marriage. There's a saying - " A belief is like a tree. Give it a good shake; if it stays up, it's a good tree." Your tree is looking decidedly shaky.
scram92 1 year ago
@scram92
You forgot that I said "very few former colony countries have progressed" .
Ireland, Poland are exceptions not to mention that they have white privilege if you know what I mean. Also those countries r surrounded by colonial masters who were already rich and it was a matter of time they would get the share.
Also cousin marriage is as dangerous as an older women having a child. Im not defending cousin marriage but given the circumstance we might as well ban older women having children.
Deyabil 1 year ago
@Deyabil "Not to mention they have white privilege, if you know what I mean." - No, I don't know what you mean. Why don't you tell me. So now low literacy rates in islamic countries are because the inhabitants are not white? This is what differentiates them from the populations of both Ireland and Poland? Okay, let's add some more former colonies with excellent rates of literacy:- Mongolia, Cuba, Guyana, Bermuda, Monserrat, Grenada... Shake, shake, shake.
scram92 1 year ago
@Deyabil
Cousin marriage is just as dangerous as older women having children? Cousin marriage is FAR more common occurrence than older women having children.
In parts of the Middle East, the rate of consanguinity is very high. This means both young AND older women are having children with their first cousins.
Older women are far less likely to procreate. Consanguineous marriages tend to produce MANY children.
So, the two are very different
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
i have no issue with what you have said about causin marraiges, but i have an issue with you claiming that imran defended this to defend his religion. Islam does not say you have to marry your causin. you say you will block people who have not read the articles, you should read up on Islam before making constant statements about Islam infesting peoples minds, it is not islam. it is culture not islam. so can you not attack the religion in this way.
thank you
jowardhar 1 year ago
@jowardhar
I have read the Quran, Hadiths, Tafsirs and thousands of pages on Islam. Enough to write an entire book on the subject.
And I do block certain people. If they lie about having read the articles - I block them.
And the reality is that most cousin marriages are between muslims. Most of the children sick from cousin marriage are muslim.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@jowardhar yes she can and she did, I can and I will as well. Islam is the most evil fucked up thing on this planet today - so kindly go to hell
PaleBunnySkinForLife 1 year ago
You know its not just so black and white when it comes to genetics. Yes, you might be promoting hereditary diseases because you are so closely related, but you can also be hitting genetic lottery by promoting advantageous genes. Its a two sided coin. On top of this, if we restict people having children solely due to the probability of the genetic inferiority of the children, you would be pandering to eugenics. Welcome GATACA
Totaltwist 1 year ago
@Totaltwist
If you go to the video description box of this video, you will find a list of peer reviewed articles published in science journals. The authors are from all over the world.
These articles all say that there is a cumulative disadvantage to inbreeding.
If, however, you have read peer reviewed essays which prove with evidence there may be an advantage, feel free to e-mail it to me. I would love to read it because it will be the first one I have ever seen.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
Look, I am going to treat you like an adult here and am going to figure you as someone who understand biology. Do you really need a peer reviewed article to understand how genes are dolled out? Its a very simple equation and I can give it to you. I by no means said that there isn't an probability or increased chance of promotion of detrimental genes, but you would also be promoting the positive ones as well. My point is that it is not as black and white as you make it.
Totaltwist 1 year ago
@Totaltwist
Thank you for your comment
This video is about the peer reviewed articles written by dozens of scientists holding a PhD from various disciplines.
Their findings is what this video is about.
To learn more, you may go to the video description box
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers
Yes, Your video is about peer reviewed articles, but I am trying to engage you with an anactual dicussion here past that and into the implications of what your video is promotion. So far you have politely evaded from the points I have been making by just pointing me to the peer reviewed articles that dont answer what I was saying to you.
Totaltwist 1 year ago
@Totaltwist
Actually, the peer reviewed articles is what this video is about. After you have read the articles, your opinions should be seriously considered. I personally think that you have not read the articles.
i recommend reading them.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers And I am telling you I have and my opinion stands. So you are either in denial or you dont want to engage me at all. Just because I have read the articles and have not come to the conclusion you have gives me the impression you dont care for actual discussion. So, good day.
Totaltwist 1 year ago
@Totaltwist
You read each of the peer reviewed articles? Really?
I do not believe you. I think you are lying about having read them all. You need to have access to certain data bases in order to get many of these articles. I am curious how you got access to all of them, and had the time to read hundreds of pages of documents. Many of the papers are highly technical.
If I made a pop quiz on all those articles, I am sure you would fail.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
You know some people can actually read and ontop of that have a credit card to buy the articles you submit. Its laughable that you actually tell people to read them and then when they have done so, call them a liar. Your whole "go read these articles" is just a rouse to keep from having an actual discussion. Then when that does not work.. you block. Welldone on being intellectually dishonest.
NephilimStar 1 year ago
This is Totaltwist by the way, the one who has read the articles and have declared a liar. But I cannot use that channel to comment and actually defend myself, atleast publically, because you blocked me.
NephilimStar 1 year ago
@NephilimStar
Because you are a liar. Those articles are very hard to get, and they are very hard to read. You would have to be a very intelligent person to have read them, and understood them.
With that, it is pretty clear you are lying
You are blocked until you prove that you read them.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NephilimStar because nobody wants to listen to a shitbag like you
PaleBunnySkinForLife 1 year ago
@NephilimStar
you did not read them.
and I block people who lie about reading them.
You are committing intellectual dishonesty by lying about reading these articles.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers Its easy Naomi. I read them before I responded to you. You my dear just dont like looking like a malicious cow. Yes, I actually bothered to do that. And you are just blocking me, avoiding me because if you actually had the balls to discuss anything with me you afraid I have. If I hadn't, like you claim, I would be the one made the fool of simply by how the conversation was being held. If I had, then that would also would be apparent. Instead, you call me a liar and block me. hmmm
genesisartno 1 year ago
@genesisartno By the way, see how nice I have been by not blocking you at all on any of my channels, evident by the fact you could post on my totaltwist channel? And not deleting the post you made on my totaltwist chanel? Its because I am an adult and have nothing to hide.
genesisartno 1 year ago
@genesisartno Also, just to show your adhoms are just you being malicious and without justice, I graduated highschool when I was 16. :) I can show you both my birth certificate and my diploma at the same time. I also took AP Biology when I was 15. Just saying.
genesisartno 1 year ago
@genesisartno
Ohhh, ahhh
Graduated when you were 16? Really? Wow. that is so impressive
( sarcasm )
And by the way... do not comment until you prove that you read the essays. My time is valueable
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@genesisartno
Whelp
I block people who are an annoyance to others, lie, or act in abusive ways
So you are blocked
Deal with it
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@genesisartno
Sure you did.
Right.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NephilimStar There is no discussion on this subject. Inbreeding is harmful and disgusting.
PaleBunnySkinForLife 1 year ago
@NephilimStar By the way the word you were looking for is RUSE - rouse means to wake someone up, or to wake up from sleep - wow you're really smart XD XD
PaleBunnySkinForLife 1 year ago
@Totaltwist my opinion is that you are a total douchebag, a liar, a cunt, and a troll, who really loves fucking his family members
PaleBunnySkinForLife 1 year ago
@PaleBunnySkinForLife
snap
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers I would also like to point out that when you argue against the breeding of a particular pair of people because of an elivated outcome, you pander to eugenics. For instance two people who carry the recesive gene for Down syndrom will have a higher chance of producing a down syndrom child(closely related or not). Or even in the case of dominant detrimental genes like Marfans or hutchinson's where all you need is one parent for the child to have it.
Totaltwist 1 year ago
@Totaltwist
Thank you for your comment
Please let me know when you finished reading all the peer reviewed articles, written by the professionals whom study the harmful effects of inbreeding.
After you completed your reading (which I read all these articles in order to make this video) I would be more than willing to hear your ideas on the matter
Thank you
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers
And what makes you think I havent read them already? Thats a bit presumptious.
Totaltwist 1 year ago
@Totaltwist presumptuous*
Totaltwist 1 year ago
@Totaltwist OMG there is no recessive gene for down syndrome, you're really stupid - besides, eugenics is something they need to spend more time on. I was raised in a poor neglectful household (NO inbreeding) and my grandfather and mother both had extremely high IQ's and so do I - IQ IS an inheritable trait anyway.
PaleBunnySkinForLife 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Totaltwist shut up you stupid cunt - shut the fuck up
PaleBunnySkinForLife 1 year ago
@Totaltwist good then you pay for all the retarded, crippled, blind, deaf offspring they create you twat - give one example of a genetics lottery from inbreeding, just one. Of course considering the pseudomale hermaphrodism spreading in palestine, targeting specific neighborhoods & all the hideous defects in england from the pakistani's, I can see you haven't done a piece of real research, shut the fuck up, it is NOT a two sided coin GOD you're stupid
PaleBunnySkinForLife 1 year ago
@PaleBunnySkinForLife
That is a good point about positive outcomes from inbreeding. I have never seen or heard of any.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
Hi i am not married, but live with a bangladeshi family, they all married cousins, thats 3 couples with 3 childrens each and not one of them are disable, infact they are all ahead of their class, humans are born with defects and thats not anyones choice but gods i also know a few more familys similar to them with no defects i think if you look for a needle in a hay stack you will eventully find it, and also people are born disable regardless maybe the numbers are one in every 20 family.
kaosinlondon 1 year ago
@kaosinlondon
Thank you for your comment. I am happy you said it. The reality is that there has never been a rule that ALL children born of cousins suffer.
Science only proves that they are far more at risk.
I hope this helps you.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers Hi i just wanted to say that they are not all muslims, Tamil people are hindu and they marry cousins, people from india are also hindu and marry cousins, i do understand that it may be more popular in pakistan.
kaosinlondon 1 year ago
@kaosinlondon
Yes, you are right. Hindu's had a tradition of uncles marrying nieces. The children of those relations tend to be much worse off.
However, according to current research most cousin marriages are Muslims. Hindu's do it as well, but less often. I am not sure why that is.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
Cousin marriage is ok. But they should pay for their own children's health services that arise as a consequence.
007salamat69 1 year ago
@007salamat69
When you say that cousin marriage is ok, do you mean morally ok or legally ok?
Is it ok for the children as well?
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers It's a cultural imperative for many Asians, with a response to warnings that is equivalent to a shrug of the shoulders. If a couple insist on having children with their cousins then, in my opinion, they should be required to pay for all subsequent health service needs for those children.
007salamat69 1 year ago
@007salamat69
Let me know once you finished reading the articles listed in the video description box. They discuss many of this issues you raise, and the issues presented in this video.
This video is about the peer reviewed articles published by numerous science journals, written by both Muslims and non Muslims.
Please read the articles before you continue posting comments
Thank you
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers I don't recognise your authority in telling me when I should continue posting comments.
Thank you
007salamat69 1 year ago
@007salamat69
You do not recognize my authority in telling you when you should and should not post comments on my videos.
Okay
Go ahead and try posting comments on my videos. And lets see if i have any authority over them.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers
LOL. The authority of the block button. If you don't politely stop posting on my video, i will politely block you from posting on my videos.
SpinozasPsyche 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers OK, no problem. Now grow up and learn to accept criticism.
I still don't recognise your authority in telling me when I should and should not post comments. Kindest Regards, from 007salamat69
Braithwaite1922 1 year ago
YOU CAN STOP LYING.... THE SO CALLED ROYALTY HAS BEEN PRACTICING INCEST FOR EONS. IT IS THE KEY TO ETERNAL LIFE IN THIS WORLD OF COURSE COUPLED WITH NOT WORSHIPPING ANYTHING AND NOT MAKING A SLAVE OF ANOTHER HUMAN BEING.
INCEST IS HOW THE BLOODLINE IS KEPT PURE.
THE ONLY WAY THE HERMAPHRODITE GENE IS PASSED IS THROUGH INCEST.
IF YOU DO NOT DO THE INCEST YOU WILL DIE.
DEATH IS ETERNITY INSIDE THE SUN, HELL, THE EVER BURNING BLAZING LAKE OF FIRE THE WITH GOD, WHO IS THE DEVIL
HUMP ON
truthtrekker 1 year ago
@truthtrekker
I think you should check your keyboard because the all caps button must be stuck
And I have a feeling your parents are first cousins - you truly are a moron.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
But in all seriousness try not to be such a judgmental cunt. its our choice and we aren't hurting anyone.
doooobies332 1 year ago
@doooobies332
I will be a judgmental cunt
That is one of the sickest things I have heard in a very long time.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
I think that making babies with your sister or first cousin is wrong because of the effects on children, BUT sex without reproduction is fine. I have sex with my sister, but use a condom. It's our decision.
doooobies332 1 year ago
@doooobies332
you have sex with your sister????
that is disgusting
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers Do you have any scientific evidence to back that up?
doooobies332 1 year ago
@doooobies332
that strewing your sister is disgusting? yes... the vomit in my mouth is the scientific evidence you need
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers my second comment, please. please, never judge a whole nation of muslims or any religion on one persons comment.
kaosinlondon 1 year ago
@kaosinlondon
I would never do such a thing
and I appreciate comments from you
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers third comment, not muslims but asians
marry cousins, pakistani, tamil , indian, bangladehi.
hope that hepls (not muslims)
kaosinlondon 1 year ago
@kaosinlondon
These people are all Muslims, and Hindus
I am sorry, but it is true. Muslims defend this practice, especially those from Pakistan.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
Evidence that cousin marriage causes low IQ ...
That's why muzzies don't contribute to society in ANY way!
Keep up the great work, lots of people hate you, that means your doing LOTS of good on Youtube.
TheRealMohammed 1 year ago
@TheRealMohammed
They do contribute to society. But the best contributions are made by Muslims who do not take their religion that seriously.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NAOMICHAMBERS-IF A PERSON WALKS PAST A MAN SEX ASSAULTIN G A CHILD/TEEN MOST PEOPLE WILL PROTECT THEIR OWN COMFORT RATHER THAN RISKING THEMSELVES TO STOP CRIMINAL- CRIMINALS SAY THEIR ARE ADDICTS AND WANT OTHERS TO STOP THEM-WE BLAME LAW FOR INSANITY SOCIETY-HOW CAN 1 POLICE CONTROL 400 MEN?LOOK UP WOMENS SHELTERS ON % OF MEN WHO ADMIT BEING VIOLET OR RAPISTS-AND HUNDREDS OF VICTIMS EACH OFFENDER-IF WE DONT LIKE A SITUATION WHAT CAN WE DO THATS EFFECTIVE? WHAT DID IROQUOIS WOMEN DO?SEE MARK9;42
lmollot 1 year ago
@lmollot
THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOUR KEYBOARD
THE ALL-CAPS BUTTON IS STUCK .... IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU ARE SHOUTING.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
HAVE YOU SEEN THE VIDEO " DEFENDING THE KILLERS OF FAMILY SEX ASSAULTERS" ?
lmollot 1 year ago
@lmollot
this has to do with honor killings?
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
1)Well I know more about dogs than I do people, and dogs with pedigree are examples of the extremes achieved with inbreeding (very small gene pools). In their case the effects are quite clear on their intelligence and psychology, not to mention chances for inherited genetic diseases which go through the roof.
xxSilverPhinxx 1 year ago
2)Intelligence-wise it the outcomes vary between breeds. Comparing dogs to people is not of much use in the specifics of critical thinking and reading comprehension skills obviously, but the general intelligence of different breeds varies tremendously within the species. It's all down to probabilities, not genetic deterioration as some people think.
xxSilverPhinxx 1 year ago
3)The big problem is when stupid breeds with stupid, the probability for stupid to be born is high and once that happens it can take a few generations of "de-inbreeding" to get out of. Intelligence is a simpler facet of genetic/biological inheritance IMO, and is not as problematic as the psychological implications of inbreeding (in the case of neuroses, psychosis, personality disorders etc) and the chance for inherited disease. Those two are more serious IMO.
xxSilverPhinxx 1 year ago
@xxSilverPhinxx
Thank you for the comments. I think you will be interested in my book when I finish it. I discuss the problem of consanguineous marriages, including many arguments for or against them.
Argument from Libertarianism and Argument from Eugenics seem to be where you are.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
Comment removed
xxSilverPhinxx 1 year ago
Comment removed
xxSilverPhinxx 1 year ago
4.1)I think the topic is interesting and the problems you bring up are real and important, that’s for sure.
Going off topic here, liberal eugenics (in the broad sense of the word) is more or less the ideology I would most identify myself with, though it's an ideology that can quickly and easily turn into something nasty. I don’t like the word “eugenics”, though, it’s has too many negative connotations and conjures images of violation.
xxSilverPhinxx 1 year ago
4.2)I think that to some degree genetic screening and elimination of harmful genes is a good thing, but the main problem with this is firstly defining which genes and traits are harmful and limiting to those genes. I wouldn't be at ease tampering with genes that affect intelligence, personality or whatever might be considered that “essence” of people but I’m all for correcting things such as diabetes, genetic propensity for cancer, Alzheimer’s
xxSilverPhinxx 1 year ago
4.3)
cont... degenerative diseases etc. and those sorts of things (assuming it’s that simple), focusing more on individual improvement and welfare rather than what’s better for and improving the human race as a whole. I think that’s not the case, so I wouldn’t call it eugenics but rather ‘genetic diagnosing’ followed by ‘treatment’ and not eugenics ;)
xxSilverPhinxx 1 year ago
Comment removed
kareimy 1 year ago
My Parents are cousin and I am their 4th Child, We are all PERFECTY fine ... All of my siblings went to college, finished school and have high paying jobs .. again .. OUR PARENTS ARE COUSINS !! >>> I am a professional soccer player and again MY PARENTS ARE COUSINS !!! ............I Am FIne .... ihjnpsodiavcnsdaocvin sd[ij HELLOWWWNIOsdvdsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
locked69 1 year ago
@locked69
Yup .... that comment sure proves you are fine :-->
Note: that was sarcasm. You are clearly a little slow.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
That's why they're idiots...
Let them destroy themselves, nobody wants them anyway..
StopGhazi 1 year ago
They can't all define it. For example, my Algerian friend doesnt think its incest. So since they cant. they think cousin marriage is okay.
spartacandream 1 year ago
@spartacandream
They will think it is okay no matter what. With some people, it is best to say..."consanguinity" or sex with someone who shares 12.5 percent of one's DNA.
I think that if they do not want to call it 'incest', it does not really matter. The fact is, they are procreating with someone who shares their DNA. In the end - that is what is going to matter
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers
If you have sex with someone who shares 12.5 percent of your dna, you won't have any children, that's bestiality. Even 98 percent would be bestiality, having sexual intercourse with a chimpanzee. I don't think that's what you meant though, but I get what you mean lol.
spartacandream 1 year ago
@spartacandream
That is incorrect. First Cousins share 12.5 percent of their DNA. First Cousins have children all the time.
Bestiality is when one has sex with animals. As long as a person has sex with another human being: be it cousin, brother or sister - it is incest, not bestiality
And... the LOL is not necessary. There is nothing amusing about incest. There is nothing amusing, that we should laugh about, when children are born sick.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers
Where are you reading 12.5?
I wasn't laughing about incest. I was laughing about the mistake you made. If I am wrong, then I will lol about the mistake I made. No need to get snippy
spartacandream 1 year ago
@spartacandream
Okay, here goes.
You share 50 percent of your DNA with your mom. You share 50 percent of your DNA with your dad. Depending on whether your sibling are half or full, you also share a significant amount of DNA with our brothers and sisters.
All humans share about 12.5 percent of their DNA with their first cousins. You share about 25 percent of DNA with your aunts and uncles.
Google the word: consanguinity
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
Typo correction:
The problem of incest
pablollama123 1 year ago
The u.s but I was just watching a special about the problem on incest in the u.s (which is how I was linked to this video). During the portion Of the video with map highlighting Islamic nations ( which you say has a problem of incest). You highlighted India which is primarily Hindu, you also even highlighted areas with high concentrations of Christian populations.
I am in no way supporting incest, I myself am aetheist. But, I don't think you should single out on religion like that.
pablollama123 1 year ago
@pablollama123
I do single out Islam. There is no denying that. Although Hindu's, Christians, and Jews have practiced cousin marriage - the rate to which Muslims do it is exponential.
Most consanguineous marriages are in Muslim families.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
Firstly, you stated it is not a problem in
pablollama123 1 year ago
In some cultures, the benefit of cousin marriages outweighs their obvious deficits. It seems like you are very passionate about this topic. However, quite obviously, Imran's comment is both right and wrong depending on the context it is interpreted.
alainawrigley 1 year ago
@alainawrigley
The benefits are only economical. The long term consequences outweigh any temporary benefits.
The topic was actually part of my book.
The context is only withing the realm of biology. In the context of biology, there is nothing beneficial about cousin marriage. It is like playing Russian Roulette with the child's health and life... all for an economical benefit.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
yeah my sister and my aunt should fuck me in a threesome.
MrDionysos23 1 year ago
You hit it right on the head when you explained HOW his religion has affected his ability to LOOK at facts which contradict the tales in his religious book !!
I am sorry Naomi, the ONLY way you can convince HIM is, if you show that SOME verse in THE 'correct translation' of quran.. says that cousin marriage is BAD :)
MrJekyllDrHyde1 1 year ago
Can I ask why we are talking about Mulsims? What about Jews who run an apartheid country and also royal families?
Wouldn't you have a better case if you widened your subject matter? But then the speak crime of talking about jews scares most i guess.
Mairinohailche 1 year ago
@Mairinohailche
People like you do not like it when we focus on Islam, therefore, what you will try to do is convince us to divert our attention away from Islam and focus on another group.
I am only interested in certain corrupt things Jews do in NYC.
But - my topic is Islam. That is my choice. And you will have to deal with it.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers nope i dont "have to put up with it" but if you try to pass yourself as a serious researcher you have to include all variations. Sad
Mairinohailche 1 year ago
@Mairinohailche
You feel that way because I have just shown that you Muslims are doing something sick and incestuous - naturally you would insult me.
You could present an argument. But instead, you resort to the primitive Islamic way of debating, which is throwing insults and mud
I will continue exposing Islam, and YOU will do nothing to prevent it.
So... move along screw boy. I have better things to do with my time than entertain your mindless drivel
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers Good Naomi!
KerynLSanchez 1 year ago
@Mairinohailche
Because it is my choice.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
Great video exposing the worse part of Islam stupidity.
ceejaywt 1 year ago
@ceejaywt i'd say the worst part is that the fanaticism drives some to kill, and others to defend the ones that kill.
streetstylemagic 1 year ago
@streetstylemagic Some would say that the 2 are closely related.
ceejaywt 1 year ago
@ceejaywt indeed they are!!
streetstylemagic 1 year ago
Why are you arguing with this inbred retard? lmao
ShaktipatSeer 1 year ago
@ShaktipatSeer
Actually, i am writing a book and this man came along just at the right time when I finished my essay.
And, I think you have a point... only a person who is inbred would defend cousin marriage.
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers You know that's very interesting.. you can really get a lot of material for writing a book from interactions here on Youtube..
On a related note.. I'd like to challenge you on the topic of atheism.. I completely agree with you that the idea of "God" is not even valid.. because over the years we have lost touch with the Understanding that the Ancients had based on their experience of reality which was pure and complete unlike ours today which is a copy of a copy of a copy..
ShaktipatSeer 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers I would argue that in the very beginning of Creation there was a primordial substance, some kind of Infinite Energy, from which all the physical dimensions and energetic dimensions unfolded from.. There has to be, because something can not come from nothing, unless that No-Thing is the Source of All Things itself. Modern science cannot answer the simple question "Where did the big bang come from?"
ShaktipatSeer 1 year ago
@ShaktipatSeer
Once again... think McFly think
THIS VIDEO IS ABOUT COUSIN MARRIAGE AND ONLY ABOUT COUSIN MARRAIGE
NaomiChambers 1 year ago
@ShaktipatSeer nobody knows what happened in the very beginning of creation before the big bang. no scientists, no religions.
streetstylemagic 1 year ago
@NaomiChambers In Hinduism they say that in the very beginning was "I AM", and from that Awareness came everything, seeing as that Awareness can never begin randomly as a result of chance, because the odds of that happening are not only astronomical or improbable they are impossible. There can never be a highly refined system of reality and evolution which arose from a floppy bunch of physical stuff banging around. Where did Law come from in your opinion? The Laws of Physics etc.? It's a valid Q
ShaktipatSeer 1 year ago
@ShaktipatSeer
Who cares? This video is about incest
NaomiChambers 1 year ago