well they will find hubs and machines under ground bits n peaces of internet hubs, the fiber optics are synthetic and last hella long time, unlike much of the metals that rust away.,
infact they have found ancient piles of degraded metal and found synthetic silicates and prts made with gold and electronic crystal.
Check out my homepage for experiments using laser. There are several easy to do examples to split the beam, modulate on of the two and then recombine them to produce low frequency beats. These beats should be able to induce currents into the body to transmit sound or steer muscles if used with high power lasers.
Yes, the Egyptians made this discovery about light and bulbs, but they didn't find a use for it. Carrying a torch was more practical then carrying a big 2 ton machine to produce a match-size light.
The pyrimad its self WAS a power station, of 0 point energy. Nikola tesla tesla remade it and copied the structual elements. its how they plated gold, illuminated the inner chambers (no carbon or touch stains on the walls) and created a civilsation hub around the pyrimads.
The aqua ducts below it, the insulating case tiles, the conductive coradors, the gold cap, the location on the energy grid and location of the Arc at the time. Look it up b4 u brain fart saying I am wrong lol
When modern society collapses because weather or some such takes a massive dump on us someone somewhere will debate over if the internet really happened. There will be absolutely no evidence the internet was as extensive as it is or what you or I type here ever happend. Just fantacy to them. Its just a simple fact. I'm sure the egyptians never thought what they accomplished and how they accomplished it would fade into myth and mystery. And its not IF its WHEN.
There is nothing gullible about finding out ancient history and today we can enjoy the internet to see and realize more things in general. Even your comment saying you are gullible in believing if that was the case nobody would read nothing because they would have someone like you saying that is gullible. This is interesting whether you believe it to be or not. Gullibe i don't think so. I just have an open mind and i don't think our ancestors were a bunch or retarded men running around.
oh just one more note to the idiots who send people nasty youtube emails. I have them filtered out so i don't recieve any stupid comments. So take you bs somewhere else.
This ancient technology bull ran it's course in the early 70's. It was an interesting diversion while it lasted. Then came along the Internet and a new gullible audience.
Our Ancestors may have lived in the stone age but the stone they built with or granite is so precise we cannot even duplicate and the stones themselves weigh more then some modern machines have a hard time lifting so yes i don't see them not being able to make bulbs. Maybe not on a higher scale we use today but it seems they had that technology.
Its also known that artist even today do sketches in stages to show their work. Why not on walls since they did write on walls. That would explain the missing pieces in some bulb diagrams. Also it would not be hard for anyone even back then to make glass or bulbs i just don't see it a hard thing to do since they are finding things out that we cannot produce even today.
Our Ancerstors were not stupid and it is believed that they had a level of understanding higher then some things we have in modern day living. We are astounded by what they had back then from building to technology that would blow us away to think they had back then. Yeah they had lighting in the pyrmids. Its been proven these bulbs work even on larger scales. Who even said they used a baghdad battery to light up the bulbs. Thats even been proven to only generate 1.5 volts like a modern day batt
I think the science behind electroplating is a little more complex than creating an arc to produce light. If the ancient egyptians could understand the principles of making a battery, then why not all principles of electricity?
The first electric light source is the Carbon Arc Lamp the predecesor of the now very expensive Xenon Short Arc Lamp. That's right, electric discharge lamps came first (long before edison's bulb), however they weren't from ancient times. They were made in the late 1800s. Sugggesting the Egyptians had any kind or electrical technology (other than simple electrochemical cells for batteries and electroplating), is just crazy pseudoscience.
Becausse the lamp as depected requires several inches of discharge. This would mean thousands of volts and the air at a sigificanly reduced pressure. A simple lemon battery would be lucky to give one quarter of a volt. To manufacturer a few tens of thousands of batteries by hand would be a daunting task to say the least.
@BankaiIchigo12345 the first example of carbon arc lamp used 2000 electrochemical batteries. they built the freeking pyramids so they could have built 100,000 batteries if they put their minds to it. but as others have said, it would be the vacuum pump that would be the problem.. well... that and the glass.
Becausse the lamp as depected requires several inches of discharge. This would mean thousands of volts and the air at a sigificanly reduced pressure. A simple lemon battery would be lucky to give one quarter of a volt. To manufacturer a few tens of thousands of batteries by hand would be a daunting task to say the least.
A voltage of one tenth of a volt is much more likely from one such lemon battery.
The vacuum pump would be difficult to build, even for reducing air pressure by half. But to bring the air pressure to less than 1% of the air pressure at sea level (as needed by things such as neon lights) would require a very strong pump involving operation of an electric motor. Constructing a pump which can pull such a strong vacuum was well beyond the ability of ancient Egyptians.
And considering that the pump would require a strong moter, where are they going to get the high current source needed to power the moter? What about the perminent magnets? What about the coils of copper wire insulated by a layer of thinner-than-human-hair enamel paint? What about all of this put together into a useable motor? Obviously the ancient Egyptians had no such technology. Where's the arceological proof that such technology existed?
And where did the egyptions get a powersupply capable of delivering several hundred to several thousand volts needed to ionize the gas, or the vacume pump needed to reduce the air pressure this much?
@BankaiIchigo12345 And where did the egyptions get a powersupply capable of delivering several hundred to several thousand volts needed to ionize the gas, or the vacume pump needed to reduce the air pressure this much?.......you have the biggest proof! The same Giza pyramid and the solar energy which they used extensively!
@schizoidchimp Yeah, most people that question conventional wisdom are called quacks... because nobody knows the answers for sure and yet they think they do. He ASKS if this is true, and says maybe it could be in his opinion- not making some crazy claim, but a quantified hypothesis and questioning it.
@schizoidchimp Read more carefully. He has never claimed or forged anything. He points at the Nazca lines and says "Could it be" that aliens had a hand in it, hoping someone can get to some conclusive answers. If you read his books, he doesn't claim ONCE or do anything but ask questions about mysterious artifacts etc. OTHER people claim that these things are so, while he simply inquires, and anyone paying attention can distinguish him from quacks with claims.
@schizoidchimp Read more carefully. He's never claimed or forged anything. He points at the Nazca lines and says "Could it be" that aliens had a hand in it, hoping someone can get some conclusive answers. If you read his books, he doesn't claim ONCE; just asks questions about mysterious artifacts etc. OTHER people claim that these things are so, while he simply inquires, and you should be capable of distinguishing the difference.
@eldongb1 For instance, he blatantly forged several pieces of "evidence" that ancient astronauts had visited the earth. When confronted with the forgeries by PBS science program NOVA in 1978, Däniken explained that he had a very good reason for the forgeries -- because people wouldn't believe his book otherwise.
@schizoidchimp LOL, that's a great reason. I enjoy watching Ancient Aliens it's fun to consider such a fantastic story, of course some of the guys on the show are batshit crazy but I do like how they make things fit nice and neatly, whether it's fact or not it's still fun. Some of things are legit, I read about Alexander the Great seeing "spaceships" when I was a kid and the centuries old paintings with spaceships are definitely very interesting
@niddasa Since all the tungsten that exists was created near the time the universe came into being, there was plenty of it at the time of the Egyptians.
@culturalhonesty you sir, are an idiot. How can you know that? Were you there at that time? What would snake do in that glass object, curved and stiff as a board?! Egypt and other ancient civilizations had the technology we can't even understand. If you can't understand something, it doesn't mean it doesn't exists or it's impossible. We have gravity, but no one explained what is that, and how it works. If we understood gravity, we could make a device that could nullify or multiply it's effect.
@bobthechipmonk "Egypt was in contact with the Romans " What a bunch of crap. Egypt is three thousand years older the the Romans. What the Egyptians had a time machine to forward in time to contact the romans and get glass blowing?? Give me a break do a simple wikipedia search before you demonstrate your stupidity.
@bobthechipmonk You just don't learn. Nobody know who or if it was burned. Could have just caught fire. Go to ehistory and do a search for "The Burning of the Library of Alexandria" You will see that you are wrong once again. Just except what you think you know is wrong. Do a simple search before you write down what you think and show yourself to be less then brilliant. It's a small thing and in your case well worth the effort.
@sanity599 "Egypt is three thousand years older the the Romans. What the Egyptians had a time machine to forward in time to contact the romans and get glass blowing??" And that is coming from you... Yet on your little Ehistory, you can clearly see that the Ancient Egyptians were in contact with the Romans... Thanks for the effort.
@bobthechipmonk Ok here is what I say to you. Realize that you know nothing. Stop talking and stop writing. Sit in meditation and have no thought. When you can do that maybe you will be ready to learn.
@bobthechipmonk What a scumbag. You asked me to helpp you. I told you what to do and yo complain about me!! Like I said stop talking, stop writting. Sit in meditation with control of your thoughts and maybe you will learn enough to join the human race.
And I don't have to be an expert to teach someone that knows nothing. That means you sonny.
@bobthechipmonk How did they evacuate the air out of the glass tube? Not until edison and his team remove the air did the filament last a significant amount of time.
@culturalhonesty you need to get your facts straight! they had glass blowing thousands of years before Romans, they had a huge power source, and there's many ways to create a bulb without filament!
@culturalhonesty hmmm I see mmm... I wonder where you got your supposed straight fact...let's see...got brainwashed and lied in a University or read it in a stupid book? you call that a fact? hahah give me a break!
@culturalhonesty well, the snake has been a representation of "illumination" throughout many cultures(the bible as a common example, the serpents/lucifer were the bringers of light, right?), well, whether be it 'illumination' from knowledge, or literal illumination, perhaps even literally "knowledge of illumination" itself,
the serpent could mean exactly what we see in this video.
also. egyptian had lazer caved walls in some temples, so dont give that
Believe the Egyptians did "invent" the light-bulb but whatever they used for the electrode made them all sterile, so ended their sand sivilization..........
That is one big bulb. Dumb egyptians, isnt it more practical to have smaller bulbs? Imagine trying to change one of those things when they are hot.. One slip and you'll be needing a new face.
@MegaPoone they probibly did it for a reason, i know the higher wattage incandescent bulbs are more efficient, this means a 100W light puts out more light than four 25W bulbs. they were smarter that you think.
@niddasa no they used hydrogen. the pyramids was built as ionospheric accumulators of electrostatic potential. the pyramids was used to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. the hydrogen was used in these plasma lamps. the pyramids was made of limestone. limestone contain quartz crystal. quartz can store electric field. many crystals will naturally hold a little charge. the rest is about resonance and frequencies like self resonance and sound vibrations.
Limestone does NOT contain quartz. Quartz is Silicon Dioxide. Limestone is Calcium Carbonate. You sir just EPIC FAILED every geology/mineralogy class EVER!!!!!!!!!!
@BankaiIchigo12345 naturally formed limestone can contain small amounts of quartz particles as well as other types of crystal particles. basically any crystal material that can act as a dielectric that does not have a antistatic property can hold electric charge.
@1Heretic You can't invent things if you don't already have an idea of what to invent, so the fact that he already made his inventions in his head before he actually made them (because it's very difficult to go the other way about it), it only makes sense.
@animaregius If you knew anything about the human body in AC feild waves you would beg for Edison's technology using DC or pulsed DC for distance. Tesla was not aware he was dieing from exposure to high voltage AC fields.
Anyone ever wonder why Edison is in every text book but Tesla seems to be left out? Considering he did everything better than Edison and Tesla's inventions are the foundation of modern technology. Doesnt seem like the order of importance is correct. Maybe trying to suppress Tesla because hes most famous for his free energy ideal. Cant have the public knowing thats possible...
@didgemonster text books and schools are all regulated by Huge elitists companies, they decide what you learn and how history will be know! just take a read through all these comments, and you will realize how many ignorant "closed (brained)" "(if any)" make stupid comments. If you want knowledge you have to look for it really deep and is not in a college or University no matter how expensive it is.
The present flap over the Persian battery is really silly. It's clearly a battery cell. The Greeks make a ball of sulfur on a stick and spun it to draw sparks, they also knew that amber can be rubbed with silk or hair and produce sparks. The word for amber is "electrum" and that is where we get the words electron and electricity- ancient Greek. In Persia the "conversion" of base metals into gold was simple electroplating- and you had to bring the piece back every so often to "renew the spell".
I saw a documentary recently that showed the advanced architecture of an ancient civilization. Very nice multi level homes with the toilet upstairs (yes, upstairs). The homes were designed to withstand earthquakes by an ingenious design and would be the envy of many a homeowner today. Yet in the scenes that reenact certain events we were still treated to depictions of primitives running around in loin cloths...
nicola telsa invented AC (alternating current) and added it to the electrical inventions of his time in france and when he came to america he tried to convince Edison to use AC but he said that they used DC in america...bastard they were rivals
So much crap they have fed us and we accepted it as FACT. All were myth. Even speed of light is not the same with different experimenters so they "agreed" to keep it constant!!! That's very scientific.
Still... there are those bas-reliefs depicting... bulbs that look like made of glass and something like a socket. And those pitch sealed ceramic jars that held an iron core and a copper jacket, possibly filled with vinegar .
And, for a God or a King... a couple of thousands of them could be made in days by slaves.
Think. About 0.5V per cell (jar) times 4000 (filling a big room)
Rub the glass with a cloth to ignite and... that's that. :|
It's NOT a light bulb in the carvings, it is a COMPRESSED AIR TANK! The 'insulator' is a piston type of bellows system and they are using the weight of the compressed air to assist in compressing more air to fill the bags made from the finely woven, dampened carpets with the tassels tied together and overlapped. The bags were used to lift the heavy stones, and the compressed air was also used for other functions (like squeezing crystals against phosphors to create light that doesn't burn.
Okay, what is with people trying to 'prove' that the ancients were stupid and couldn't have possibly had things like a bulb? Heron of Alexandria built a steam engine prototype--so why not a light bulb?
This year is very speical , it's encoded in the pyramid ! 481 the height of the pyramid times 12 of the zodiac = the jewish new year 5772, 29th of September 2011 . Spread the good news !
Lightbulbs 14.000 years old ha ! Think what we are tought about at schools from childhood or are progtammed at the way someone want to ha ? Yes because the technology we are useing today is the technology of evil ! Piramids in egypt and not only are set in a way so they are allyed to the stars hmmm. What if i would say to you that 14.000 years ago people would be able to fly ! yes..ancient anti-gravity machines..like that wich u call UFO used by RUSSIA..USA and more today..
Of course this video does nothing to prove the theory. All it proves is that it is possible in this day and age to make a light bulb that has a vague resemblance to an ancient engraving. It doesn't explain how the glass was blown, and a vacuum introduced within. It doesn't explain how the Electricity was generated. Basically this is pure pseudoscience in its most blatant form. Now...Egyptians MIGHT have had such things. But this show should prove THAT...not prove they can make a novelty lite.
@hck112 Um......you do realize that a light bulb would be pointless without electricity right? If an ancient Egyptian invented a Light Bulb then he would have to ALREADY have access to Electricity. That would be like inventing a car before you had invented the wheel....it would be pointless, and no one would even come up with the Idea...because you NEED a wheel to even conceive of a car!! LOL....same with a light bulb.
@frankensteinmoneymac So it's nonsense for the Egyptian to invent the light bulb, and the same thing for the Iraqi. But why did they invent them 'for'?
@hck112 The Iraqi 'Bagdad Battery' has been theorized to have been used as an electroplating device...to Gold Plate lesser metals, for instance. There is no real proof that the Egyptians had a light bulb, other than some suggestive pictures. I am open to the possibility of them having some basic electricity, though. I was just making the point that IF they invented a light bulb...they'd HAVE to have electricity. I'd sooner imagine they had electric arc lamps before a modern light bulb though.
@omgwtfbbq6666 Actually Da Vinci invented a chair with a large screw on top, that was supposed to 'screw' through the air. A fanciful Idea, but of course it would have never came close to flying. You'd have better luck flapping your arms with some fake bird wings attached to em. At least then you might be able to glide a couple feet if you ran really fast into a very strong wind. Not knocking his genius....but some of his 'inventions' have been far overstated.
I constantly hear "how did they make engravings in the dark?" as an argument for the existence of the lightbulb in ancient Egypt (on the grounds that torches would have left soot on the ceilings and there is no soot). Why has no one ever considered that the carvings were made BEFORE the blocks were put in place?
@Enerbias The engravings on the blocks were quite often changed as new Rulers came to power. Archeologists have actually seen the evidence of this in countless hieroglyphs in Ancient Egyptian Tombs. Many blocks...perhaps even most of them have been carved, over and over again anywhere from dozens to hundreds of times. There are other reasons too, but this one is pretty good proof that you're Idea is wrong....its a nice theory though, I applaud you for thinking outside the box.
People forget the "Truth" of where man came from' They love to tell elabotate stories' and forget about Necromancy and Geomancy' and the real "Father" of the Hue-Mental Being' I would suggest folks get educated and wake up' instead of adults acting like children following the sheep of religions and the "Illusion" schools and the elite feed the populace' As I said' Take it slow' the truth shall rip your world to pieces' Basse' Nobunoni + The Hue-Mental Being EA'rthling is very easy to "FOOL"
The Egyptians symbolized the spirit/soul as a snake. In this glyph they have already
trapped the spirit/soul inside of these holding tubes, they are now placing the spirits in the clones/matter/golem so they may be endowed with the intelligence and reason of the soul thus they make better servants rather than organic machines which need to take orders before they will engage. Ez' Nobunoni +
This explanation is total bullshit' The bulb shape "Tubes" with the snakes inside' depicted in the "Glyphs" are way more sinister than these idiots can concieve'
The snake in the tube is a soul'
This soul is being put into "Golom" creations' so they become sentient and can follow orders without being prompted all the time'
The story of "Man" taught by the Elite is total bullshit'
The "Truth" would no doubt rip your tiny little worlds to pieces' Language is a most powerful tool of "Slavery"
Edison claimed he invented DC, Tesla introduced AC, but im preetty sure, Science put aside, we can all agree that ACDC invented/created/introduced THE BEST ROCK N' ROLL THAT WAS HEARED ON THIS PLANET
OK, so this means they could blow large glass bulbs and fill them with an inert gas, seal the bulbs, then put high voltage electricity through it? There's no evidence for any of that other technology that's required to make it all owrk. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
@ConstantinIV take some copper, lemon juice and put it into a clay jar stick the copper out of the top and you should get 5 volts....Energy is everywhere, energy has just been changed into something that we can see or use...it's always there, just up to you to find a way of seeing it or using it. Take magnets for example, wrap copper wire around a tube, pass a magnet through it with out touching it and you will get a charge...wireless charge, try it... it works.
@ConstantinIV How is your history of Egypt? How long did it take to build the pyramids? According to the ancient Greek historian Herodotus, the Great Pyramid took 20 years to construct and demanded the labour of 100,000 men.
completion date | 2570 BC. Height | 456 feet (139 meters) Original height | 481 feet (147 metres) do the math...
@XXRevolveXX i dont belive that we can't build pyramids like those or even bigger... if they did... why can't we? they weren't some aliens, they were humans just like us...
@Shumaka84 we could likely build it bigger nowadays, I mean we have CONCRETE! we can make it as dielectric as we want and hard as stone if we like. They were humans just like us with a lot of time and great purpose... Great purpose was the driving factor (Striking down enemies, lavishly experiencing the good life, EM distilleries(water into wine!) seemingly it is a magical time no wonder they took on the roles of gods they weilded some hella amazing stuff that noone else had or could explain.
so because they lived thousdands of years ago they must be stupid....yea thats real smart lets just shove it down people's throat and control what people think
They probably weren't smarter or stupider than us, but even Da Vinci couldn't have build the light bulb.
Knowledge is build on another, Newton thought he could make a philosopher's stone, that dosn't mean he was stupid, it only means that he hadn't so much work of other people to base his theories on.
We only know it's crap, because of people like him, who tried it!
@ConstantinIV philosophers stone ooh that sounds cool, only because now i hear that its not just a harry potter movie, it really is something. Honestly man these egyptologists are crazy if they don't see whats staring them in the face... "hook" the hardware back up and watch what happens... We sit around and wonder why gold is so expensive, its because these guys knew back then, that it was an excellent conductor (still the best to this day I believe) I think I will experiment w making egyptech
technology was considered sacred and only the kings could use it. that at least makes sense... eventually a commoner was smart enough to re-discover it and now everyone can use it. it must makes one wonder what our high elect have access to that we don't.
@XXRevolveXX We also found the same exact pre-sandscript writing around the whole entire world that was from many thouasands of years ago, meaning we had a global civilization and bigger brains when we were "Monkeys".
yeah, we don't even get taught real history any more it depends on who writes these stories but we have found a one sided magnetic stone goblet that is impossible to build here on earth and many other technologies we don't even know the purpose of.
Thomas Edison (that A-hole) did not "invent " DC - it was discovered many years prior as for the lightbulb... a arc lamp had already be invented- I am calling Edision a A-Hole due to his ruthless stealing of others ideas.... and for his stubborness in not giving up when Tesla introduced AC- even though Edison knew that AC was superior to DC-
@DJelectfire Tesla was amazing and wonderful , brilliant guy ..too bad.. the world didnt listen to him.. well... if electricity was free ... the world economy would change like anything ....
@DJelectfire Thomas Edison didn't even invent that version of the lightbulb, it was patented a year before in England by Joseph Swan. He was only able to get the patent rights to it because it hadn't been patented in the U.S. yet.
@Bellithe AC doesn't (nor for that matter does DC) - it's the fact that it's ELECTRICITY!
AC is considered more dangerous due to it's rapid cycles (the alternating part) - which would be like being hit with rapid punches ---- What people don't get is is not the type of current nor the voltage that kills it's the Amperage -
@DJelectfire umm, ac is less dangoerus because it does not lock your muscles. if you touch an object electrified with dc, your hand will clamp on it and won;t let go untill you die. with ac it reacts a bit diferent and you still can get away with a shock. AC is less dangerous then DC (at low frequency, like the wall socket for example) but both are verry dengerous. i am not sure but the dangerous voltage is considered more then 24v ( i am not sure) but inpractice...
@stalkersas in practice it depends on the circumstances, you can feal a shock at 12 volts or don;t even feal 200v. if you have your hands verry dry (like after working with ciment a long time and not using ani hand cream) you can not feal even 200v (tested on self, in SAFE conditions). also you can feal a shock even from 12 v if you wet your hands with salt solution (wich is not too much worse then sweaty hands) and and touch the output of an @ 12 ac source (ac is easyer to sense).
@stalkersas I think I understand what you're saying - I am not sure which would actually be technically "more" dangerous.... not only would that be hard to test.... (too many variables, not to mention dangerous) Either way my main point is still correct - amperage is what kills - voltage and amperage are tied together though - as voltage is potential energy and amperage is the actual amount of electrons (i.e. electricity) flowing through a circuit in a certain period of time.
@DJelectfire short version: dc is more dangerous then ac. amps are useless without volts and vice-versa. car batteries can;t kill, neether do electric lighters (one can provide up to 1000a and the other up to 20kv :P) as for energy, well, sometimes ppl survive the shock and die from burns, but that's not the case of a wall socket. hapens at over 1kv.
AC is more dangerous than DC to the individual being shocked (volts and amps regardless), because the current traveling back-and-forth at 50-60 hertz is better at overcoming electrical resistance (including the kind naturally present in human skin). The back-and-forth electrical vibration is also more likely to induce cardiac arrhythmia. However, the immense amount of overhead wiring necessary to support a DC power grid presented a greater danger to the public overall.
@DJelectfire Edison was the Gates of his time. Steal a invention and then discredit the inventor and keep it for yourselves. Just look what that B@st@rd did to Tesla!
@DJelectfire A.C. is NOT superior to D.C. in all applications, for transferring electricity long distance I will confide that A.C. is better but if you just have the power source near you, than ac is the way to go
well they will find hubs and machines under ground bits n peaces of internet hubs, the fiber optics are synthetic and last hella long time, unlike much of the metals that rust away.,
infact they have found ancient piles of degraded metal and found synthetic silicates and prts made with gold and electronic crystal.
iwanalive4ever 2 weeks ago
i can do that with a burned out light bulb, the clear ones with a copy machine power supply lol
that is not much usable light its plasma and it looks briter on a camera.
iwanalive4ever 2 weeks ago
i thinks its funny how we were taught that the old civilizations were dumb and not as smart as advanced as us they have it completely wrong
damagedone56 2 weeks ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my homepage for experiments using laser. There are several easy to do examples to split the beam, modulate on of the two and then recombine them to produce low frequency beats. These beats should be able to induce currents into the body to transmit sound or steer muscles if used with high power lasers.
wwwtotalitaerde 3 weeks ago
Why only show 16 seconds of that. wtf? FAIL
CmdrGendoIkari 3 weeks ago
Scary music, sound of bulb cracking "And it functioned, It works". Well, goddamn, thats all I needed to know about this subject.
Dalagastia 3 weeks ago
Anyone up for pyramid hunting? SWIM will bring the LSD.
bobdull420 1 month ago
Yes, the Egyptians made this discovery about light and bulbs, but they didn't find a use for it. Carrying a torch was more practical then carrying a big 2 ton machine to produce a match-size light.
16nowhereman 1 month ago
The pyrimad its self WAS a power station, of 0 point energy. Nikola tesla tesla remade it and copied the structual elements. its how they plated gold, illuminated the inner chambers (no carbon or touch stains on the walls) and created a civilsation hub around the pyrimads.
The aqua ducts below it, the insulating case tiles, the conductive coradors, the gold cap, the location on the energy grid and location of the Arc at the time. Look it up b4 u brain fart saying I am wrong lol
11kungfu11 1 month ago
Time to look for that stupid cunts comment "culturalhonesty" and rag on him for not knowing shit all about anything clearly lol
11kungfu11 1 month ago
When modern society collapses because weather or some such takes a massive dump on us someone somewhere will debate over if the internet really happened. There will be absolutely no evidence the internet was as extensive as it is or what you or I type here ever happend. Just fantacy to them. Its just a simple fact. I'm sure the egyptians never thought what they accomplished and how they accomplished it would fade into myth and mystery. And its not IF its WHEN.
BrimstoneMerc 2 months ago 14
@BrimstoneMerc
Good. Good comment. Gets me thinking about seriously. Thanks!
Gut. Guter Kommentar. Gibt mir sehr zu denken. Danke!
pk5573 1 month ago
Nice resolution, ya twats
VicariousReality7 2 months ago
I'm not saying it was aliens.
But it's aliens.
MajMatye 3 months ago
Light Bulb Worked.
Candles Didn't.
zorazen2 3 months ago
There is nothing gullible about finding out ancient history and today we can enjoy the internet to see and realize more things in general. Even your comment saying you are gullible in believing if that was the case nobody would read nothing because they would have someone like you saying that is gullible. This is interesting whether you believe it to be or not. Gullibe i don't think so. I just have an open mind and i don't think our ancestors were a bunch or retarded men running around.
madman007ist 3 months ago 2
oh just one more note to the idiots who send people nasty youtube emails. I have them filtered out so i don't recieve any stupid comments. So take you bs somewhere else.
madman007ist 3 months ago
This ancient technology bull ran it's course in the early 70's. It was an interesting diversion while it lasted. Then came along the Internet and a new gullible audience.
MegaPoone 3 months ago
Our Ancestors may have lived in the stone age but the stone they built with or granite is so precise we cannot even duplicate and the stones themselves weigh more then some modern machines have a hard time lifting so yes i don't see them not being able to make bulbs. Maybe not on a higher scale we use today but it seems they had that technology.
madman007ist 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Its also known that artist even today do sketches in stages to show their work. Why not on walls since they did write on walls. That would explain the missing pieces in some bulb diagrams. Also it would not be hard for anyone even back then to make glass or bulbs i just don't see it a hard thing to do since they are finding things out that we cannot produce even today.
madman007ist 3 months ago
Comment removed
madman007ist 3 months ago
Our Ancerstors were not stupid and it is believed that they had a level of understanding higher then some things we have in modern day living. We are astounded by what they had back then from building to technology that would blow us away to think they had back then. Yeah they had lighting in the pyrmids. Its been proven these bulbs work even on larger scales. Who even said they used a baghdad battery to light up the bulbs. Thats even been proven to only generate 1.5 volts like a modern day batt
madman007ist 3 months ago
Comment removed
madman007ist 3 months ago
I think the science behind electroplating is a little more complex than creating an arc to produce light. If the ancient egyptians could understand the principles of making a battery, then why not all principles of electricity?
jz62 4 months ago
The first electric light source is the Carbon Arc Lamp the predecesor of the now very expensive Xenon Short Arc Lamp. That's right, electric discharge lamps came first (long before edison's bulb), however they weren't from ancient times. They were made in the late 1800s. Sugggesting the Egyptians had any kind or electrical technology (other than simple electrochemical cells for batteries and electroplating), is just crazy pseudoscience.
BankaiIchigo12345 5 months ago
@BankaiIchigo12345 the carbon arc lamp was first run using lots of batteries so why couldn't the egyptians have done so?
zuluknob 4 months ago
@zuluknob
Becausse the lamp as depected requires several inches of discharge. This would mean thousands of volts and the air at a sigificanly reduced pressure. A simple lemon battery would be lucky to give one quarter of a volt. To manufacturer a few tens of thousands of batteries by hand would be a daunting task to say the least.
BankaiIchigo12345 4 months ago
@BankaiIchigo12345 the first example of carbon arc lamp used 2000 electrochemical batteries. they built the freeking pyramids so they could have built 100,000 batteries if they put their minds to it. but as others have said, it would be the vacuum pump that would be the problem.. well... that and the glass.
zuluknob 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zuluknob
Becausse the lamp as depected requires several inches of discharge. This would mean thousands of volts and the air at a sigificanly reduced pressure. A simple lemon battery would be lucky to give one quarter of a volt. To manufacturer a few tens of thousands of batteries by hand would be a daunting task to say the least.
BankaiIchigo12345 4 months ago
@zuluknob
A voltage of one tenth of a volt is much more likely from one such lemon battery.
The vacuum pump would be difficult to build, even for reducing air pressure by half. But to bring the air pressure to less than 1% of the air pressure at sea level (as needed by things such as neon lights) would require a very strong pump involving operation of an electric motor. Constructing a pump which can pull such a strong vacuum was well beyond the ability of ancient Egyptians.
BankaiIchigo12345 4 months ago
@BankaiIchigo12345 .5 volts .youtube.com/watch?v=MlFZ4h4RUwE
zuluknob 4 months ago
@zuluknob
And considering that the pump would require a strong moter, where are they going to get the high current source needed to power the moter? What about the perminent magnets? What about the coils of copper wire insulated by a layer of thinner-than-human-hair enamel paint? What about all of this put together into a useable motor? Obviously the ancient Egyptians had no such technology. Where's the arceological proof that such technology existed?
BankaiIchigo12345 4 months ago
And where did the egyptions get a powersupply capable of delivering several hundred to several thousand volts needed to ionize the gas, or the vacume pump needed to reduce the air pressure this much?
BankaiIchigo12345 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BankaiIchigo12345 And where did the egyptions get a powersupply capable of delivering several hundred to several thousand volts needed to ionize the gas, or the vacume pump needed to reduce the air pressure this much?.......you have the biggest proof! The same Giza pyramid and the solar energy which they used extensively!
johnshredder1 1 month ago
Where is my comment from before?
Is that channel Alien controlled?
MucusFelidae 5 months ago
Aach. It iz Erisch vaan Danikken. Phenomenal. Aztonisching! Mein Goot!
XonWechtvt 5 months ago
Such an idiot! Nobody had ever claimed that Edison inveted the direct current
donnomar 5 months ago
Pointless waste of time as the "Egyptian bulb" was infact a representation of a snakes amniotic birth sack.....
MrStoney1961 5 months ago
I'm not saying it was aliens,
But it was aliens.
HoneyGlazedHams 5 months ago
erich von daniken is a fucking quack
schizoidchimp 5 months ago
@schizoidchimp Yeah, most people that question conventional wisdom are called quacks... because nobody knows the answers for sure and yet they think they do. He ASKS if this is true, and says maybe it could be in his opinion- not making some crazy claim, but a quantified hypothesis and questioning it.
eldongb1 5 months ago
@eldongb1 no, he makes crazy claims and backs it up with forged "evicence". he's a quack.
schizoidchimp 5 months ago
@schizoidchimp Read more carefully. He has never claimed or forged anything. He points at the Nazca lines and says "Could it be" that aliens had a hand in it, hoping someone can get to some conclusive answers. If you read his books, he doesn't claim ONCE or do anything but ask questions about mysterious artifacts etc. OTHER people claim that these things are so, while he simply inquires, and anyone paying attention can distinguish him from quacks with claims.
eldongb1 5 months ago
@schizoidchimp Read more carefully. He's never claimed or forged anything. He points at the Nazca lines and says "Could it be" that aliens had a hand in it, hoping someone can get some conclusive answers. If you read his books, he doesn't claim ONCE; just asks questions about mysterious artifacts etc. OTHER people claim that these things are so, while he simply inquires, and you should be capable of distinguishing the difference.
eldongb1 5 months ago
@eldongb1 For instance, he blatantly forged several pieces of "evidence" that ancient astronauts had visited the earth. When confronted with the forgeries by PBS science program NOVA in 1978, Däniken explained that he had a very good reason for the forgeries -- because people wouldn't believe his book otherwise.
schizoidchimp 5 months ago
@schizoidchimp What did he forge?
eldongb1 5 months ago
@eldongb1 Pottery depicting "UFOs".
schizoidchimp 5 months ago
@schizoidchimp LOL, that's a great reason. I enjoy watching Ancient Aliens it's fun to consider such a fantastic story, of course some of the guys on the show are batshit crazy but I do like how they make things fit nice and neatly, whether it's fact or not it's still fun. Some of things are legit, I read about Alexander the Great seeing "spaceships" when I was a kid and the centuries old paintings with spaceships are definitely very interesting
IWouldWin 5 months ago
@niddasa Since all the tungsten that exists was created near the time the universe came into being, there was plenty of it at the time of the Egyptians.
phthisicy 6 months ago
i knew aliens were real!!
ramendan 6 months ago
The battery doesnt produce enough energy its under 1 volt or something.
221Dw 6 months ago
@221Dw Voltage has nothing to do with energy content. Something can have the energy to light a city and still be only 1 volt.
phthisicy 6 months ago
@221Dw research into it ! they had a different type of electricity, not the explosion but implosion system
johnshredder1 1 month ago
Big problems:
1. Egyptians never had glass blowing, therefor could not invent the a glass bulb
2. They fail to say what is generating the power, sorry but the baghdad vinegar "battery" wouldnt cut it.
3. There are a few nearly identical hieros, each missing vital "parts" for creating this "bulb".
4. There is no filament, it is clearly a snake.
5. They lied about building it with exact dimensions, it would have been much larger
culturalhonesty 6 months ago 6
Comment removed
decipherx1 4 months ago
@culturalhonesty Egyptians created glass blowing look it up.
decipherx1 4 months ago
@decipherx1 Bullshit.
murf69 4 months ago
@murf69 I cannot post the pic here here but look up Egyptain glass blowing.
decipherx1 4 months ago
@culturalhonesty you sir, are an idiot. How can you know that? Were you there at that time? What would snake do in that glass object, curved and stiff as a board?! Egypt and other ancient civilizations had the technology we can't even understand. If you can't understand something, it doesn't mean it doesn't exists or it's impossible. We have gravity, but no one explained what is that, and how it works. If we understood gravity, we could make a device that could nullify or multiply it's effect.
vindieselzmajfon 4 months ago
@vindieselzmajfon do tell, how did they power this "light bulb"?
culturalhonesty 4 months ago
@culturalhonesty
1. Egypt was in contact with the Romans who had glass blowing.
2. Just make more batteries?
3. Missing vital "parts"? can we read their language? so we can't assume that.
4. Stop trolling
5. How do you know it would of been much larger? You know about Egyptian Scales?
bobthechipmonk 3 months ago 12
@bobthechipmonk "Egypt was in contact with the Romans " What a bunch of crap. Egypt is three thousand years older the the Romans. What the Egyptians had a time machine to forward in time to contact the romans and get glass blowing?? Give me a break do a simple wikipedia search before you demonstrate your stupidity.
sanity599 4 weeks ago
@sanity599 You do know that the romans are the one that burned the library of Alexandria?
bobthechipmonk 4 weeks ago
@bobthechipmonk You just don't learn. Nobody know who or if it was burned. Could have just caught fire. Go to ehistory and do a search for "The Burning of the Library of Alexandria" You will see that you are wrong once again. Just except what you think you know is wrong. Do a simple search before you write down what you think and show yourself to be less then brilliant. It's a small thing and in your case well worth the effort.
sanity599 3 weeks ago
@sanity599 "Egypt is three thousand years older the the Romans. What the Egyptians had a time machine to forward in time to contact the romans and get glass blowing??" And that is coming from you... Yet on your little Ehistory, you can clearly see that the Ancient Egyptians were in contact with the Romans... Thanks for the effort.
bobthechipmonk 3 weeks ago
@bobthechipmonk You are just to stupid for the effort. Go away and jerkoff somewhere else. You have no thought just mental masturbation.
sanity599 3 weeks ago
@sanity599 Naw man tell me. Teach me almighty. You seem to know what happen 2000+ years ago...
bobthechipmonk 3 weeks ago
@bobthechipmonk Ok here is what I say to you. Realize that you know nothing. Stop talking and stop writing. Sit in meditation and have no thought. When you can do that maybe you will be ready to learn.
sanity599 3 weeks ago
@sanity599 Who made you an expert on the subject?
bobthechipmonk 3 weeks ago
@bobthechipmonk What a scumbag. You asked me to helpp you. I told you what to do and yo complain about me!! Like I said stop talking, stop writting. Sit in meditation with control of your thoughts and maybe you will learn enough to join the human race.
And I don't have to be an expert to teach someone that knows nothing. That means you sonny.
sanity599 3 weeks ago 2
@bobthechipmonk How did they evacuate the air out of the glass tube? Not until edison and his team remove the air did the filament last a significant amount of time.
I highly doubt the Egyptians build a light bulb.
UnderManlac 3 weeks ago
@UnderManlac Have you ever seen the trick where you make a hard boiled egg go in a glass tube with some regular candles by creating a vacuum?
bobthechipmonk 3 weeks ago
@culturalhonesty pyramids created the energy needed, in thoery
frosti7 2 months ago
@culturalhonesty you need to get your facts straight! they had glass blowing thousands of years before Romans, they had a huge power source, and there's many ways to create a bulb without filament!
johnshredder1 1 month ago
@johnshredder1 STRAIGHT FACTS - GLASS BLOWING WAS INVENTED WELL AFTER THE LAST EGYPTIAN DYNASTY
culturalhonesty 1 month ago
@culturalhonesty hmmm I see mmm... I wonder where you got your supposed straight fact...let's see...got brainwashed and lied in a University or read it in a stupid book? you call that a fact? hahah give me a break!
johnshredder1 1 month ago
@culturalhonesty well, the snake has been a representation of "illumination" throughout many cultures(the bible as a common example, the serpents/lucifer were the bringers of light, right?), well, whether be it 'illumination' from knowledge, or literal illumination, perhaps even literally "knowledge of illumination" itself,
the serpent could mean exactly what we see in this video.
also. egyptian had lazer caved walls in some temples, so dont give that
"they had crappy technology" nonsense
H0B0J03 1 month ago
Believe the Egyptians did "invent" the light-bulb but whatever they used for the electrode made them all sterile, so ended their sand sivilization..........
MaineShag55 6 months ago
@MaineShag55 not really! a King destroyed their civilization.
johnshredder1 1 month ago
I have an EDC pocket flashlight made from an ancient Egyptian light bulb and powered by a Baghdad battery.
riothero313 6 months ago
That is one big bulb. Dumb egyptians, isnt it more practical to have smaller bulbs? Imagine trying to change one of those things when they are hot.. One slip and you'll be needing a new face.
MegaPoone 7 months ago
@MegaPoone they probibly did it for a reason, i know the higher wattage incandescent bulbs are more efficient, this means a 100W light puts out more light than four 25W bulbs. they were smarter that you think.
powermaks 7 months ago
@powermaks But not smart enough to make a 100watt light bulb the same size as a 25 watt lightbulb.
MegaPoone 7 months ago
@MegaPoone if Egyptians were dumb then you are far from even having the IQ of a mosquito
johnshredder1 1 month ago
@johnshredder1 Ockam's Razor.
MegaPoone 1 month ago
@MegaPoone That's right! you need a simpler explanation since your brain can't understand what's normal to others.
johnshredder1 1 month ago
@MegaPoone that is right
johnshredder1 1 month ago
@niddasa no they used hydrogen. the pyramids was built as ionospheric accumulators of electrostatic potential. the pyramids was used to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. the hydrogen was used in these plasma lamps. the pyramids was made of limestone. limestone contain quartz crystal. quartz can store electric field. many crystals will naturally hold a little charge. the rest is about resonance and frequencies like self resonance and sound vibrations.
coldarc 7 months ago
@coldarc
Limestone does NOT contain quartz. Quartz is Silicon Dioxide. Limestone is Calcium Carbonate. You sir just EPIC FAILED every geology/mineralogy class EVER!!!!!!!!!!
BankaiIchigo12345 5 months ago
@BankaiIchigo12345 naturally formed limestone can contain small amounts of quartz particles as well as other types of crystal particles. basically any crystal material that can act as a dielectric that does not have a antistatic property can hold electric charge.
coldarc 4 months ago
doesn't really emit too much light tho
50kT 7 months ago
Edison said genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration.
Tesla said if Edison would think a little more he wouldn't sweat so much.
meagain2222 8 months ago 48
@meagain2222 Tesla is a huge genius, i have books that he wrote and he said that everything he invented was already made inside his mind!!
1Heretic 4 months ago
@1Heretic You can't invent things if you don't already have an idea of what to invent, so the fact that he already made his inventions in his head before he actually made them (because it's very difficult to go the other way about it), it only makes sense.
MrTrentag1988 4 months ago
@meagain2222 Tesla for the win
volk551 4 months ago
@meagain2222 Tesla was right, the advantage of Tesla over Edison is that Nikola Tesla is a mathematician
animaregius 3 months ago
@animaregius If you knew anything about the human body in AC feild waves you would beg for Edison's technology using DC or pulsed DC for distance. Tesla was not aware he was dieing from exposure to high voltage AC fields.
MightyZarkon 2 months ago
@meagain2222 So true! thanks bro!
johnshredder1 1 month ago
Anyone ever wonder why Edison is in every text book but Tesla seems to be left out? Considering he did everything better than Edison and Tesla's inventions are the foundation of modern technology. Doesnt seem like the order of importance is correct. Maybe trying to suppress Tesla because hes most famous for his free energy ideal. Cant have the public knowing thats possible...
didgemonster 8 months ago
@didgemonster text books and schools are all regulated by Huge elitists companies, they decide what you learn and how history will be know! just take a read through all these comments, and you will realize how many ignorant "closed (brained)" "(if any)" make stupid comments. If you want knowledge you have to look for it really deep and is not in a college or University no matter how expensive it is.
johnshredder1 1 month ago
The present flap over the Persian battery is really silly. It's clearly a battery cell. The Greeks make a ball of sulfur on a stick and spun it to draw sparks, they also knew that amber can be rubbed with silk or hair and produce sparks. The word for amber is "electrum" and that is where we get the words electron and electricity- ancient Greek. In Persia the "conversion" of base metals into gold was simple electroplating- and you had to bring the piece back every so often to "renew the spell".
thorargent 8 months ago
Is this a clip from an actual documentary or is this just science-fiction BS?
CoolDudeClem 9 months ago
I saw a documentary recently that showed the advanced architecture of an ancient civilization. Very nice multi level homes with the toilet upstairs (yes, upstairs). The homes were designed to withstand earthquakes by an ingenious design and would be the envy of many a homeowner today. Yet in the scenes that reenact certain events we were still treated to depictions of primitives running around in loin cloths...
Keruaran 9 months ago
nicola telsa invented AC (alternating current) and added it to the electrical inventions of his time in france and when he came to america he tried to convince Edison to use AC but he said that they used DC in america...bastard they were rivals
amber69babe 9 months ago
Fake
evitafab 9 months ago
So much crap they have fed us and we accepted it as FACT. All were myth. Even speed of light is not the same with different experimenters so they "agreed" to keep it constant!!! That's very scientific.
healer378 9 months ago
Stupid.
You think they could create a high enough vacuum in the bulb and find high enough voltage -other than static electricity?
Of course this would work. Nothing special.
robertgift 9 months ago
Still... there are those bas-reliefs depicting... bulbs that look like made of glass and something like a socket. And those pitch sealed ceramic jars that held an iron core and a copper jacket, possibly filled with vinegar .
And, for a God or a King... a couple of thousands of them could be made in days by slaves.
Think. About 0.5V per cell (jar) times 4000 (filling a big room)
Rub the glass with a cloth to ignite and... that's that. :|
yo6ial 11 months ago
It's NOT a light bulb in the carvings, it is a COMPRESSED AIR TANK! The 'insulator' is a piston type of bellows system and they are using the weight of the compressed air to assist in compressing more air to fill the bags made from the finely woven, dampened carpets with the tassels tied together and overlapped. The bags were used to lift the heavy stones, and the compressed air was also used for other functions (like squeezing crystals against phosphors to create light that doesn't burn.
Brian
Dreadragon 11 months ago
You people are commenting on this short of a video like you are historians.
kylelarson79 11 months ago
Okay, what is with people trying to 'prove' that the ancients were stupid and couldn't have possibly had things like a bulb? Heron of Alexandria built a steam engine prototype--so why not a light bulb?
ciuacoatl 11 months ago
So does that look a lotus with some aroma?
7Nexus21 11 months ago
This year is very speical , it's encoded in the pyramid ! 481 the height of the pyramid times 12 of the zodiac = the jewish new year 5772, 29th of September 2011 . Spread the good news !
SuperHorusra 11 months ago
@SuperHorusra good news for everyone!
MultigrainPie 10 months ago
Lightbulbs 14.000 years old ha ! Think what we are tought about at schools from childhood or are progtammed at the way someone want to ha ? Yes because the technology we are useing today is the technology of evil ! Piramids in egypt and not only are set in a way so they are allyed to the stars hmmm. What if i would say to you that 14.000 years ago people would be able to fly ! yes..ancient anti-gravity machines..like that wich u call UFO used by RUSSIA..USA and more today..
petrospress 11 months ago
what is this from,= source why is this "edited" what is being left out?!
WAPTek2 11 months ago
Of course this video does nothing to prove the theory. All it proves is that it is possible in this day and age to make a light bulb that has a vague resemblance to an ancient engraving. It doesn't explain how the glass was blown, and a vacuum introduced within. It doesn't explain how the Electricity was generated. Basically this is pure pseudoscience in its most blatant form. Now...Egyptians MIGHT have had such things. But this show should prove THAT...not prove they can make a novelty lite.
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
The Iraqi had the ancient battery, then the Egyptian had light bulb. However why didn't they combine them together?
hck112 1 year ago
@hck112 Um......you do realize that a light bulb would be pointless without electricity right? If an ancient Egyptian invented a Light Bulb then he would have to ALREADY have access to Electricity. That would be like inventing a car before you had invented the wheel....it would be pointless, and no one would even come up with the Idea...because you NEED a wheel to even conceive of a car!! LOL....same with a light bulb.
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
@frankensteinmoneymac So it's nonsense for the Egyptian to invent the light bulb, and the same thing for the Iraqi. But why did they invent them 'for'?
hck112 1 year ago
@hck112 The Iraqi 'Bagdad Battery' has been theorized to have been used as an electroplating device...to Gold Plate lesser metals, for instance. There is no real proof that the Egyptians had a light bulb, other than some suggestive pictures. I am open to the possibility of them having some basic electricity, though. I was just making the point that IF they invented a light bulb...they'd HAVE to have electricity. I'd sooner imagine they had electric arc lamps before a modern light bulb though.
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
So? Da Vinci invented a fucking helicopter in the 15th century....
omgwtfbbq6666 1 year ago
@omgwtfbbq6666 Actually Da Vinci invented a chair with a large screw on top, that was supposed to 'screw' through the air. A fanciful Idea, but of course it would have never came close to flying. You'd have better luck flapping your arms with some fake bird wings attached to em. At least then you might be able to glide a couple feet if you ran really fast into a very strong wind. Not knocking his genius....but some of his 'inventions' have been far overstated.
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
I constantly hear "how did they make engravings in the dark?" as an argument for the existence of the lightbulb in ancient Egypt (on the grounds that torches would have left soot on the ceilings and there is no soot). Why has no one ever considered that the carvings were made BEFORE the blocks were put in place?
Enerbias 1 year ago
@Enerbias The engravings on the blocks were quite often changed as new Rulers came to power. Archeologists have actually seen the evidence of this in countless hieroglyphs in Ancient Egyptian Tombs. Many blocks...perhaps even most of them have been carved, over and over again anywhere from dozens to hundreds of times. There are other reasons too, but this one is pretty good proof that you're Idea is wrong....its a nice theory though, I applaud you for thinking outside the box.
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
People forget the "Truth" of where man came from' They love to tell elabotate stories' and forget about Necromancy and Geomancy' and the real "Father" of the Hue-Mental Being' I would suggest folks get educated and wake up' instead of adults acting like children following the sheep of religions and the "Illusion" schools and the elite feed the populace' As I said' Take it slow' the truth shall rip your world to pieces' Basse' Nobunoni + The Hue-Mental Being EA'rthling is very easy to "FOOL"
Nobunoni 1 year ago
The Egyptians symbolized the spirit/soul as a snake. In this glyph they have already
trapped the spirit/soul inside of these holding tubes, they are now placing the spirits in the clones/matter/golem so they may be endowed with the intelligence and reason of the soul thus they make better servants rather than organic machines which need to take orders before they will engage. Ez' Nobunoni +
Nobunoni 1 year ago
This explanation is total bullshit' The bulb shape "Tubes" with the snakes inside' depicted in the "Glyphs" are way more sinister than these idiots can concieve'
The snake in the tube is a soul'
This soul is being put into "Golom" creations' so they become sentient and can follow orders without being prompted all the time'
The story of "Man" taught by the Elite is total bullshit'
The "Truth" would no doubt rip your tiny little worlds to pieces' Language is a most powerful tool of "Slavery"
Nobunoni 1 year ago
Edison claimed he invented DC, Tesla introduced AC, but im preetty sure, Science put aside, we can all agree that ACDC invented/created/introduced THE BEST ROCK N' ROLL THAT WAS HEARED ON THIS PLANET
Alex2149 1 year ago
@heatflash888 and the myans built the grand plaza of the sun without the wheel. what's ur point
quashman 1 year ago
The History Channel has destroyed civilization.
ZechsMerquise73 1 year ago 33
OK, so this means they could blow large glass bulbs and fill them with an inert gas, seal the bulbs, then put high voltage electricity through it? There's no evidence for any of that other technology that's required to make it all owrk. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
LanceHall 1 year ago 6
wooe
smallblaker 1 year ago
@XXRevolveXX
Because there is a difference between a building of stone [slavery gets shit done!] and whatever this thingy is.
I can't realy tell much from this 16s video, but I'm quite shure that thingy didn't run on puppy farts and happy thoughts.
It probably needs electricity.
ConstantinIV 1 year ago
@ConstantinIV take some copper, lemon juice and put it into a clay jar stick the copper out of the top and you should get 5 volts....Energy is everywhere, energy has just been changed into something that we can see or use...it's always there, just up to you to find a way of seeing it or using it. Take magnets for example, wrap copper wire around a tube, pass a magnet through it with out touching it and you will get a charge...wireless charge, try it... it works.
lawsarejusttogovern 1 year ago
@ConstantinIV How is your history of Egypt? How long did it take to build the pyramids? According to the ancient Greek historian Herodotus, the Great Pyramid took 20 years to construct and demanded the labour of 100,000 men.
completion date | 2570 BC. Height | 456 feet (139 meters) Original height | 481 feet (147 metres) do the math...
lawsarejusttogovern 1 year ago
@XXRevolveXX i dont belive that we can't build pyramids like those or even bigger... if they did... why can't we? they weren't some aliens, they were humans just like us...
Shumaka84 1 year ago
@Shumaka84 we could likely build it bigger nowadays, I mean we have CONCRETE! we can make it as dielectric as we want and hard as stone if we like. They were humans just like us with a lot of time and great purpose... Great purpose was the driving factor (Striking down enemies, lavishly experiencing the good life, EM distilleries(water into wine!) seemingly it is a magical time no wonder they took on the roles of gods they weilded some hella amazing stuff that noone else had or could explain.
TheMadamoxRustkickit 1 year ago 3
so because they lived thousdands of years ago they must be stupid....yea thats real smart lets just shove it down people's throat and control what people think
mejico94 1 year ago
@mejico94
They probably weren't smarter or stupider than us, but even Da Vinci couldn't have build the light bulb.
Knowledge is build on another, Newton thought he could make a philosopher's stone, that dosn't mean he was stupid, it only means that he hadn't so much work of other people to base his theories on.
We only know it's crap, because of people like him, who tried it!
ConstantinIV 1 year ago
@ConstantinIV philosophers stone ooh that sounds cool, only because now i hear that its not just a harry potter movie, it really is something. Honestly man these egyptologists are crazy if they don't see whats staring them in the face... "hook" the hardware back up and watch what happens... We sit around and wonder why gold is so expensive, its because these guys knew back then, that it was an excellent conductor (still the best to this day I believe) I think I will experiment w making egyptech
TheMadamoxRustkickit 1 year ago
@XXRevolveXX Yes we can build monument that would last 3000 yrs... but since we don't have thousands of slaves it would be way to expensive.
EVILxRESIDENT 1 year ago
plasma light.
websuspect 1 year ago
technology was considered sacred and only the kings could use it. that at least makes sense... eventually a commoner was smart enough to re-discover it and now everyone can use it. it must makes one wonder what our high elect have access to that we don't.
GarySpatzScam 1 year ago
@GarySpatzScam watch the show ancient aliens. it offers a lot of explanations and one on how they attained the knowledge to build all that stuff
kaseyfan999 1 year ago
@XXRevolveXX We also found the same exact pre-sandscript writing around the whole entire world that was from many thouasands of years ago, meaning we had a global civilization and bigger brains when we were "Monkeys".
abbazin102 1 year ago
yeah, we don't even get taught real history any more it depends on who writes these stories but we have found a one sided magnetic stone goblet that is impossible to build here on earth and many other technologies we don't even know the purpose of.
abbazin102 1 year ago
First, the light bulb. Iron will have to wait.
Corona688 1 year ago
Thomas Edison (that A-hole) did not "invent " DC - it was discovered many years prior as for the lightbulb... a arc lamp had already be invented- I am calling Edision a A-Hole due to his ruthless stealing of others ideas.... and for his stubborness in not giving up when Tesla introduced AC- even though Edison knew that AC was superior to DC-
DJelectfire 1 year ago 71
@DJelectfire Tesla was amazing and wonderful , brilliant guy ..too bad.. the world didnt listen to him.. well... if electricity was free ... the world economy would change like anything ....
dhakagod 1 year ago
@DJelectfire
Ne he is an asshole because he killed dogs to tell people how bad AC is.
DomesticHacks 1 year ago
@DJelectfire Thomas Edison didn't even invent that version of the lightbulb, it was patented a year before in England by Joseph Swan. He was only able to get the patent rights to it because it hadn't been patented in the U.S. yet.
BygmesterFinnegan 1 year ago
@DJelectfire But AC kills elephants!
Bellithe 9 months ago
@Bellithe AC doesn't (nor for that matter does DC) - it's the fact that it's ELECTRICITY!
AC is considered more dangerous due to it's rapid cycles (the alternating part) - which would be like being hit with rapid punches ---- What people don't get is is not the type of current nor the voltage that kills it's the Amperage -
DJelectfire 9 months ago
@DJelectfire umm, ac is less dangoerus because it does not lock your muscles. if you touch an object electrified with dc, your hand will clamp on it and won;t let go untill you die. with ac it reacts a bit diferent and you still can get away with a shock. AC is less dangerous then DC (at low frequency, like the wall socket for example) but both are verry dengerous. i am not sure but the dangerous voltage is considered more then 24v ( i am not sure) but inpractice...
stalkersas 9 months ago
@stalkersas in practice it depends on the circumstances, you can feal a shock at 12 volts or don;t even feal 200v. if you have your hands verry dry (like after working with ciment a long time and not using ani hand cream) you can not feal even 200v (tested on self, in SAFE conditions). also you can feal a shock even from 12 v if you wet your hands with salt solution (wich is not too much worse then sweaty hands) and and touch the output of an @ 12 ac source (ac is easyer to sense).
stalkersas 9 months ago
@stalkersas I think I understand what you're saying - I am not sure which would actually be technically "more" dangerous.... not only would that be hard to test.... (too many variables, not to mention dangerous) Either way my main point is still correct - amperage is what kills - voltage and amperage are tied together though - as voltage is potential energy and amperage is the actual amount of electrons (i.e. electricity) flowing through a circuit in a certain period of time.
DJelectfire 9 months ago
@DJelectfire short version: dc is more dangerous then ac. amps are useless without volts and vice-versa. car batteries can;t kill, neether do electric lighters (one can provide up to 1000a and the other up to 20kv :P) as for energy, well, sometimes ppl survive the shock and die from burns, but that's not the case of a wall socket. hapens at over 1kv.
stalkersas 9 months ago
@DJelectfire
AC is more dangerous than DC to the individual being shocked (volts and amps regardless), because the current traveling back-and-forth at 50-60 hertz is better at overcoming electrical resistance (including the kind naturally present in human skin). The back-and-forth electrical vibration is also more likely to induce cardiac arrhythmia. However, the immense amount of overhead wiring necessary to support a DC power grid presented a greater danger to the public overall.
logik316 8 months ago
@DJelectfire
Sorry, I was being sarcastic referring to the elephant Edison electrocuted to 'prove' how dangerous AC was.
Bellithe 8 months ago
@DJelectfire Edison was the Gates of his time. Steal a invention and then discredit the inventor and keep it for yourselves. Just look what that B@st@rd did to Tesla!
damic 9 months ago
@damic Indeed!
DJelectfire 9 months ago
@DJelectfire A.C. is NOT superior to D.C. in all applications, for transferring electricity long distance I will confide that A.C. is better but if you just have the power source near you, than ac is the way to go
SirDude456 7 months ago
@SirDude456 you mean dc is the way to go, that i agree. now days with transistors, they are designed for DC.
powermaks 7 months ago
@SirDude456 transferring electricity long distance ... A.C. is better
For transfering electricity long looong (and still longer) distances, DC is better.
Funny, isn't it?
MucusFelidae 5 months ago
@MucusFelidae wait, what?
SirDude