Phase-shift Plasma Turbine - Interplanetary Space Flight

[kisko211]

How do you learn this? or if I may rephrase it. Where would be a great place to start?

[mferreirajr]

@kisko211

If you’re open-minded, you can gain wisdom from everything you try and gather insight. What do you wish you should learn about; there is countless information out there over the web.

[bakothegreat]

@mferreirajr BROTHER THIS ISNT FOCUSED AT ALL, your talking about a mass-thruster, then start to talk about how all your doing is adding phases to the Vasimir project. What are you getting at? You have a flawed theory and I am going to correct all your ideas right now, but deserve full credit when you realize that I am right.

Find an energy source you trust. Calculate your potential energy. Then apply math to your propulsion to produce your potential thrust. More efficient that way.

[darian1968]

Just as i thought as well.It seems its firing like a rifling pattern through tubes the effect is the same and so is the out come but as to how fast? Thats the issue. but if the ship catches a current or eddies in space the ship will move faster than let say standard 25000mph to 50k mph or more. Lets build it i would like to see the answers to this. How long to get a working model post me back thanks.

[mferreirajr]

@darian1968

Maximum exhaust speed depends upon axial length of one turn and frequency, e.g. vL=Lf, f=50kHz, L=60cm => vL=30000 m/s = 108000 km/h = 67108 mph. Hence, the turbine should be long and/or strong enough to keep plasma accelerating until it gets closer to its maximum speed. Unhappily, there is no interest for now from the space agencies to fund a working model.

[SuperFinGuy]

Yeah a prototype is needed, by the way don't be fooled by the supposed speed of light limit, c is the relative observational limit only. Check /watch?v=hiKyoZJOTbs

[zomgwtfbbqbagel]

Sorry but, I don't think we'll ever get to mars.

[danielbluesmoke]

How can you make all this information public? Why don't you found a company and start from there? Did you had experiments of the concepts you present here?

[mferreirajr]

@danielbluesmoke

I've tried contact companies, space agencies and institutions, up to now what exists is a complete lack of interest from them. Nevertheless, I'm still trying to raise some funds to build, test and improve the concepts.

[danielbluesmoke]

@mferreirajr So after all, this is real science? I think they are not interested because so many claim these days that can do extraordinary things, and in fact what they do is pseudo-science, stuff to trick people. But if this is real science and you can make an experiment and prove that this works, then go ahead and patent it! Because others will claim the fruits of your work! I wouldn't make all that information public! Maybe you can ask for help to the scientific-community with this...

[vliegschotel]

Hello Steve Stap,

You forgot to calculate the political side.

If you have something that really could shake up something like Space Travel by inventing Gravity Control and it interferes with an obsolete technology like rockets, you will not get anywhere. Look at > One Terminal Capacitor <. I offered it to Nasa, where the John Glenn Propulsion Engineers rejected it. The Shuttles could have been converted and flown for many more years very economically.

[SteveStap1]

Great ideas are a dime a dozen, being bold and risky enough to attempt them are rare occurrences. IF YOU BUILD IT THEY WILL COME.

[TheC1c2c3c4c]

@SteveStap1

thats the problem you cant build it... that design of a fusion reactor is invalid unless you can suspend the fuel source therefore the engine only works in space assuming that the motors would even generate thrust.

[Neverdweller]

@SteveStap1 Or rather... we will go.