@pedropacheco888 I agree. i want evidence of gas chambers not some bullshit aerial photos. As far as I know they could be telling me some bullshit lie. I want to see people in the gas chambers being stuffed. This narrator can not fool me with the smooth music and his soft voice.
'When we arrived we had to report to the camp commandant, SS-Haupstürmfuhrer Bothmann...He explained that we had been dedicated to the Kulmhof (Chelmno) extermination camp as guards and added that in this camp the plague boils of humanity, the Jews, were exterminated. SS guard Theodor Malzmueller quoted in Klee et al, (1992) "The Good Old Days" p. 217
@CryWolf1986 You refer to knowing several historians (not a proper noun so no need for capital letter) with different opinions about which 'story'? You should call yourself by your proper name, you are a denier not a revisionist; PROFESSIONAL historians revise and continue to revise what we know about the Shoah.
Jail, beaten, threatened, house burned to the ground, life threatened; please explain what connection this has with 'using accepted rules of evidence'.
@CryWolf1986 Have you actually looked at the codoh website lately? you will find that the term 'ad hominem' is not applicable as ad hominem is the LOGICAL FALLACY of attempting to undermine an argument by attacking the speaker instead of addressing the argument. I am not using a fallacious argument, I am making a logical factual statement based on the actual content and its nature.
@CryWolf1986 Your attempt to infer that my argument stating "the codoh is not a reputable source" is not Ad Hominem, it is simply a fact that ANY source not composed of academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly monographs, and textbooks (e.g. VERIFIABLE) is considered ACADEMICALLY UNRELIABLE. I am well aware that codoh claims to simply desire open public debate yet conveniently forgets that the Holocaust story HAS been debated, using accepted rules of evidence, for nearly seventy years
@CryWolf1986 I have no immediate need to reply to your question, you are lazy because the information you want is widely available, all it takes is a little RESEARCH of reputable sources, the codoh is not a reputable source, it is a collection of anti-Semite rants and misinterpretations designed to portray the Nazis in a favourable light, nothing about the Nazis stands up to close scrutiny.
@CryWolf1986 You need to read the journal article I cited before thinking you are capable of replying to my comment; it is a well researched piece of work dealing with a specialised subject. 'Mainstream Holocaust historians' is a misnomer, if you are a historian who specialising in researching the Holocaust you are not mainstream. Answer back AFTER reading the article, it will open your eyes.
@CryWolf1986 No need to show your lack of knowledge about Auschwitz, the massive camp was not one single camp but three; Auschwitz I, Auschwitz II - Birkenau and Auschwitz III - Monowitz (Monowice). At its peak in the summer of 1944, Auschwitz covered about 40 sq. km. in the core area, and more than 40 branch camps dispersed within a radius of several hundred kilometers. Try researching your subject before commenting.
the document is a proven fraud,just like the lamp shades, and Jew soap....Jew soap??? are you fucking stupid???....How come Churchill DeGaulle, and Eisenhower in 7,000 plus pages of writings on WWII never,ever,ever,ever,once mentioned gas chambers or mass murders???...
@krew666666 Which 'document' are you referring to? Holocaust deniers often try to poison the water with misinformation picked up from their anti-Semitic bretheren. The lamp-shade (singular not plural) was used as evidence in the trial of Ilse Koch (Bitch of Buchenwald), the use of Jewish bodies in soap was a myth perpetrated by THE NAZIS during the war.
@krew666666 In Neander (2006) it is explained that the alleged manufacturing of soap from the bodies of concentration camp inmates at the Danzig Anatomic Institute—has a core of truth because they used the soapy grease, that was a by-product of anatomic preparations, for cleaning purposes within the institute during the last months of the war. Neander, J., (2006) The Danzig Soap Case: Facts and Legends around "Professor Spanner" and the Danzig Anatomic Institute 1944-1945, German Studies Review
you have to be an ignorant moron to believe the Jew lies,seeing they control the media it is not surprising.... Why is it that ,according to Jewish numbers,there were more Jews after the WAR than before?...Or why is it that in 1919....NY GOVERNOR Martin L. Wynn writes an article about 6 million Jews dying in a holocaust?
@krew666666 You have to be an ignorant moron to believe the Holocaust deniers lies. They are racist thugs with a radical ideology based on a social construct with no evidence to support their warped theories. They peddle hate and only attract other haters and misfits into their ranks. Why deny the factual evidence of thousands of documents, film, photographs and archaeology as well as verbal and written testimony from the perpetrators and victims?
Incredible how the narrator got ALL that information from aerial photos.
Photos showed people being selected?
Photos showed people being gassed?
pedropacheco888 1 month ago
@pedropacheco888 I agree. i want evidence of gas chambers not some bullshit aerial photos. As far as I know they could be telling me some bullshit lie. I want to see people in the gas chambers being stuffed. This narrator can not fool me with the smooth music and his soft voice.
ILUVJEZUZ94 1 week ago
Poor Jews - they had it pretty bad back then. We need to remember this stuff.
MrMedicinebox 1 month ago
@MrMedicinebox Oh, we will make shure, it won't be forgotten, what the ´jews did!
Never forget and never forgive!
Bommelmensch 2 weeks ago
'When we arrived we had to report to the camp commandant, SS-Haupstürmfuhrer Bothmann...He explained that we had been dedicated to the Kulmhof (Chelmno) extermination camp as guards and added that in this camp the plague boils of humanity, the Jews, were exterminated. SS guard Theodor Malzmueller quoted in Klee et al, (1992) "The Good Old Days" p. 217
rearly62 2 months ago
@CryWolf1986 You refer to knowing several historians (not a proper noun so no need for capital letter) with different opinions about which 'story'? You should call yourself by your proper name, you are a denier not a revisionist; PROFESSIONAL historians revise and continue to revise what we know about the Shoah.
Jail, beaten, threatened, house burned to the ground, life threatened; please explain what connection this has with 'using accepted rules of evidence'.
rearly62 2 months ago
@CryWolf1986 Have you actually looked at the codoh website lately? you will find that the term 'ad hominem' is not applicable as ad hominem is the LOGICAL FALLACY of attempting to undermine an argument by attacking the speaker instead of addressing the argument. I am not using a fallacious argument, I am making a logical factual statement based on the actual content and its nature.
rearly62 2 months ago
@CryWolf1986 Your attempt to infer that my argument stating "the codoh is not a reputable source" is not Ad Hominem, it is simply a fact that ANY source not composed of academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly monographs, and textbooks (e.g. VERIFIABLE) is considered ACADEMICALLY UNRELIABLE. I am well aware that codoh claims to simply desire open public debate yet conveniently forgets that the Holocaust story HAS been debated, using accepted rules of evidence, for nearly seventy years
rearly62 2 months ago
@CryWolf1986 I have no immediate need to reply to your question, you are lazy because the information you want is widely available, all it takes is a little RESEARCH of reputable sources, the codoh is not a reputable source, it is a collection of anti-Semite rants and misinterpretations designed to portray the Nazis in a favourable light, nothing about the Nazis stands up to close scrutiny.
rearly62 2 months ago
@CryWolf1986 You need to read the journal article I cited before thinking you are capable of replying to my comment; it is a well researched piece of work dealing with a specialised subject. 'Mainstream Holocaust historians' is a misnomer, if you are a historian who specialising in researching the Holocaust you are not mainstream. Answer back AFTER reading the article, it will open your eyes.
rearly62 2 months ago
@CryWolf1986 No need to show your lack of knowledge about Auschwitz, the massive camp was not one single camp but three; Auschwitz I, Auschwitz II - Birkenau and Auschwitz III - Monowitz (Monowice). At its peak in the summer of 1944, Auschwitz covered about 40 sq. km. in the core area, and more than 40 branch camps dispersed within a radius of several hundred kilometers. Try researching your subject before commenting.
rearly62 3 months ago
Simply horrific
EvilSirJasper 3 months ago
the document is a proven fraud,just like the lamp shades, and Jew soap....Jew soap??? are you fucking stupid???....How come Churchill DeGaulle, and Eisenhower in 7,000 plus pages of writings on WWII never,ever,ever,ever,once mentioned gas chambers or mass murders???...
krew666666 4 months ago
@krew666666 Which 'document' are you referring to? Holocaust deniers often try to poison the water with misinformation picked up from their anti-Semitic bretheren. The lamp-shade (singular not plural) was used as evidence in the trial of Ilse Koch (Bitch of Buchenwald), the use of Jewish bodies in soap was a myth perpetrated by THE NAZIS during the war.
rearly62 3 months ago
@krew666666 In Neander (2006) it is explained that the alleged manufacturing of soap from the bodies of concentration camp inmates at the Danzig Anatomic Institute—has a core of truth because they used the soapy grease, that was a by-product of anatomic preparations, for cleaning purposes within the institute during the last months of the war. Neander, J., (2006) The Danzig Soap Case: Facts and Legends around "Professor Spanner" and the Danzig Anatomic Institute 1944-1945, German Studies Review
rearly62 3 months ago
you have to be an ignorant moron to believe the Jew lies,seeing they control the media it is not surprising.... Why is it that ,according to Jewish numbers,there were more Jews after the WAR than before?...Or why is it that in 1919....NY GOVERNOR Martin L. Wynn writes an article about 6 million Jews dying in a holocaust?
krew666666 4 months ago
@krew666666 You have to be an ignorant moron to believe the Holocaust deniers lies. They are racist thugs with a radical ideology based on a social construct with no evidence to support their warped theories. They peddle hate and only attract other haters and misfits into their ranks. Why deny the factual evidence of thousands of documents, film, photographs and archaeology as well as verbal and written testimony from the perpetrators and victims?
rearly62 3 months ago
the audio is not quite right. just fyi.
profesionaldj2003 4 months ago
THE LIBERATION OF KZ DACHAU (Trailer)
Unklebillybob 4 months ago
The facts are ridiculous.. but the footage is amazing
kanwulfNL 8 months ago
Comment removed
ShalomIsrael60 7 months ago
@ShalomIsrael60 Sure after you!
kanwulfNL 7 months ago
Ridiculous.
RuledByMars65 8 months ago in playlist Auschwitz forgotten evidence