@Nedplease In a democracy it's majority rules, and the majority of the population would rather not die of cancer. The side effects of drinking are known, but they aren't as bad as smoking. Plus when you drink it only affects one person, whereas smoking affects other people. And if society isn't there to protect citizens then what is it there for? It's not an opinion it's a fact.
Doesn't second and smoke affect people other than the smokers? imo you shouldn't compare drinking with smoking like that because drinking doesn't hurt other people. There are cases where it will hurt others when people get drunk and attack family members, but that just means that they are addicts. If they didn't have drinking they'd probably just move onto a more dangerous drug.
@Nedplease Society has a responsibility to protect the citizens that are too stupid to protect themselves. They enforce seatbelts in cars and helmets on motorbikes because it's for their own good. The only reason there hasn't been an all out ban of cigarette smoking is because you morons would cause a riot. I agree that people have a right to make their own choices but there are certain rules that are restrictions for the good of society. Smoking is easy to stop, finding a new fuel isnt...
to further my last comment...yes vehicle emissions are not only confined to pubs but are a constant source every second of everyday...yet these stupid mother fucking government goers havent even bothered with banning people from getting in their fucking cars each morning!!! pisses me off
@MrPhinian I hope you're joking because that is probably the stupidest thing i've ever read. So because there are other dangers out there we shouldn't bother trying to protect ourselves at all? The world revolves around driving and using petrol, that's just how it is. Stopping people from smoking wouldn't make the country shut down. If you can stop people from smoking then that's one thing off the list of dangers.
the onlu thing i wanna say about this video regarding the smoking ban here in the uk is this....People(of the non-smoking type) are always saying that its to do with the smell and the fact that it also limits their lifespan should they have to come into contact with smoke fumes... so my question is this...what about CARS AND MOTORBIKES you dumb fuckers??? they are a constant source of airborne emmisions that will not only fuck you up(yes some people even use car emissions as a form of suicide)
"This woman should be shot, fucking hung and excecuted all at once!" You've controdicted yourself. In a free country that wouldn't happen ;D As you said we don't live in Nazi Germany :P
for those who winge about smoking...why dont they fuck off, when people are smoking...smoking has been around for fucking decades, and it never used to be a problem,...retarded twats
well, what about the health of the people that serve you. They dont necessarily want to be exposed to the smoke. But the smoking in the streets thing is stupid. That is kinda taking away your freedom. I think in some states in America you cant smoke in bars either. At least I dont think you can in california
No you sound like a fkn hypoicrite. Against smokers but you are a gambler. Gambling fucks up the sports and you are a part of it screwing it. It's just an smoker snon smokers thing wich is very trendy at the moment.
you could argue that the right not to smoke is violated when people smoke in the street, and non-smokers have to inhale the smoke.
i'm not going to revert to mindless swearing, i think the point she was making was that non-smokers have as much right, if not more, to be able to breath the air they wish to breath, which in this case is clean un-cancer-causing-air.
smoking is more dangerous than the majority of banned substances, its certainly more addictive, its just embedded in british society...
"We live in a freedom country. We can do what we want." Exactly, therefore I think that it is ok for her to support the smoking ban. I don't understand why you cannot accept this. I think that you are a hipocrite and should not speak about "rights as human beings" whatsoever. Next time try not to be so one-sided and choose more than one comment because a debate is when you present two sides of the story.
Ps. Was it the chavs who forced you to make a video on this topic? Sad.
Beer and cigarettes just go together; I live in Las Vegas, and the only place that you cannot smoke are the "nice" restaurants, but in the pubs/bars, casinos, and private offices if they choose to smoke.
Whatever this crazy lady thinks, the government (every one in living memory) has always walked a fine line in an effort to look like they're doing something about smoking without actually doing anything. like "we'll make them smoke outside" "we'll raise tobacco taxes by 25p"
they're never gonna do anything serious about smoking, they get maybe £10 billion a year from taxes on it. frankly, the government cant *afford* for people to stop smoking.
you are the one who should be hung (not until you die but just until you realise what an idiot you are) i like your other videos but nazis? this is nowhere near what the nazis did. why do swear so much in this video? chill the "fuck" out!!! do you smoke? is that why you are getting so angry? if you do then you are even more of an idiot than you sound in this video.
lol i love how you ask us to give our opinion and then say about "use your mind we dont live in nazi germany" hahah.... so basically if people disagree they aint using there minds....
Personally i think the smoking ban is stupid ..... there were certain areas that smokers were meant to go.... and non- smokers didnt go there.. if they stunk of smoke they obv went to close to a smoking area.... in my opinion the smoking ban shud be abolished
OMG! Thought I recognized you! You put on a stone but you look great! When you were back explaining chavs, you appeared undernourished. Hope, though, you're getting on, mate.
i dont actually care if people want to smoke but to be honest it is pretty gross when you're coming out of a shopping centre or something and you're just walking into this big cloud of smoke
In my opinion, smoking ought to be allowed in "pubs", night clubs, and other designated areas in cafes and such.
I live in Las Vegas, and you can smoke in bars, casinos, music venues, and up until 2008 you use to be able to smoke inside Food Markets where they have the video poker; inside 7-11's and gas stations in the section with the video poker machines you can still smoke in there.
that something like this just drives people mad as it has to do with a legal addiction. Council tax, council estates, road tax, tv tax, mot, it's all bullshit. English people are struggling for their rights so I can understand all the frustration when something else gets taken away.
Haha. I live in Canada and it's been illegal to smoke in pubs (including pub balconies and outdoor pub areas) and restaurants since the mid 90's. It's also illegal to smoke in your car if you have children in the vehicle, and it's illegal to smoke anywhere that someone else might have no other choice than to stay at (i.e. a bus stop). People get along fine with these laws. I think the problem in England, having lived here, is that English people are stripped of so many rights
Smokers should only be allowed to smoke outside. My room is in the back of my building, and everyone smokes in the room outside of it because it has a door to the backyard. But even if they leave that door open while they smoke, the smoke still enters my room. I have weak lungs and the smoke makes me cough uncontrollably. So really, smoking rooms aren't foolproof. I'd prefer it if people went only outside to smoke.
I think the whole world should be changed because you are a weakling. How do you manage with vehicle fumes? I think the west needs a cull of all the sickly weaklings that are making society weak.
has anyone heard the news (that in the uk) that it might be illegal to smoke outside pubs in the near future?? i couldn't believe it when i heard it :( apparently it's because barmen say they're at risk because they're breathing in the second hand smoke.. through the door or something i dunno lol
I live in Maryland of the US, and smoking is allowed anywhere in public, just not INSIDE restaurants and bars and (other public places, obviously) which that law just came around about 2 yrs. ago. However, you can smoke whereever the hell you want when your oustside, even if it's an outside restaurant.
Some of you people have been so brainwashed. Its a small stick of burning leaves. The government have just bombarded everyone with junk science to detract you from real threats to your health. All oppressive goverments have a scapegoat. The new world orders is smokers. Have you Idiots not took the time to question, why everthing blamed on smoking is increasing. Yet smoking has been decreasing. IT'S A SMOKESCREEN.
You can spend your money where you like. If enough people were so opposed to smoke, there would have been loads of non-smoking pubs. Instead of loads of closed pubs. This is the most divisive law the west has ever had. The new world order want places where ordinary people meet to close. Vote UKIP the only party that wants freedom of choice.
Yeah we don't live in nazi germany but you want to execute people for having the opinion that the smoking ban should be further continued... No comment needed on that.
Also yeah i wouldn't have a problem if it caused no damage what so ever but it's disgusting and every year smoking related illnesses take much of our national health services' funding
Normally i'm a fan of you but god that's such a closed minded opinion you should go back to what people keep telling you , be the funny guy.
I think the smoking ban should stay at it is, but there should be pubs dedicated just for smoking and drinking - no family meals etc. I'm not a fan of smoke, it makes my asthma really bad so I'm trying to get my dad to quit.
the thing is though people who think it's 'cool' to smoke around others... i don't mind if people smoke when they're not IN your face. they should be allowed to smoke outside or in bars.
BUT i went to this underage festival and there were 2 girls smoking, and everybody was literally crushed up against each other with no space to move and they were burning people and they didn't give a crap. plus it stank, thats a bit rude.. aha
I agree. People take it too far. The argument that it's bad for the health of you & folk around you. What fucking isn't these days? Alcohol is a bigger killer than smoking or second hand so why not do away with that too? This dickhead ban should not only be relaxed but completely lifted. As long as there is a seperate, designated area for smokers or non-smokers, then what's the fucking deal? If they don't like it for whatever reason then fuck off out of it. Wtf happend to freedom?
i don't think it should be relaxed, but i think all clubs and pubs should have an outside, heated covered area where smokers can go and smoke happily, because a bunch of smokers standing outside a pub blowing it in your face before you go in side is not nice, but its also not fair to completely take the right to smoke in a pub away either
cigarette smoke is just a tiny bit of all the shit thats already goin on in the air we breathe. Its retarded that we cant smoke right next to a fucking car that if breathed in the air it was emmiting for ten seconds would fucking kill you.
you've let out the anger ive kept inside! it fair enough if people dont want to breathe in other peoples smoke but they cant make us stand outside and THEN tell us smoking is anti-social. we'd be sitting inside with the non-smokers having a banter if it wasn't for those knobs.
Jordan, are you a smoker by chance?moking in enclosed places is unpleasent especially in resturants or in buildings which handle food. Plus the main reason the ban came in was to protect workers (waitresses/waiters) from secondhand smoke. It is unfair that people should have to put up with somebody sucking on a fag in the corner while they try to eat a nice meal. Smokers should have the respect to go outside to smoke anyway; ban or no ban. Rarely disagree with you Jordan but this time I do.
If there were both smoking and non-smoking establishments, I'm sure there are enough smoking and non-smoking workers to serve all establishments. Any worker so offended by smoke and so stupid to go to work in a smoking establishment doesn't deserve a law protecting their stupidity. Neither do stupid diners. The law went too far in banning smoking in all establishments. Personal responsibility, not government nanny-ism would have been a better way to go.
i would rather smell piss than cigs though, my local used to be poor ventilated, so on a busy night you could see jeack all, and they would put fans on the bar, so when you went to order, smoke would be in your face and the bar maid is fine.
coz when ever i go out in lesta there is a smoking area
so me and my mates just go and have a fag every now and then
i think it be a good idea for it to have smoking area
not that because i do smoke
just because its alot easyer and more pubs will be getting custemers through the door coz i notice ever since the smoking ban has come in not many people went to the pubs coz you had to go outside for a fag
people just like to drink and smoke at home nower days
it should be relaxed lmfao. i live here in england and as i don't smoke myself and dont really see the point to be honest but i dont think it should be banned. it should be allowed in pubs and in football stadiums. why you can't smoke at a footie game anyway i don't know,i mean there is a huge fucking hole where the celing should be!
I dont think ther should have been a smoking ban in the first place...if u didnt want the smoke in your face move then and that stupid fukin women ....smokin ban in the streets ? wot is she on
But - Smoking is annoyin and anti-social... Should be allowed in the streets, but not in enclosed places... And no we are not in a free country - No where is...
Here in California, some localities have banned outdoor smoking. Some landlords don't allow smoking and will evict you if you do. Anti-smoking activists are trying to enact a statewide ban of smoking in condos and apartments because smoke might waft out of your unit and disturb your neighbours and any passersby.
Regarding pubs and restaurants, I think it should be okay for owners to have their establishment either smoking or nonsmoking, but CLEARLY SIGNED. Then, if smoking offends you, keep your ass out of smoking establishments and go somewhere else. That would preserve freedom and choice for everyone. The free market would dictate success or failure of the establishments.
The drinking age has traditionally been left to the states to determine. It is currently back up to age 21 in all 50 states due to lobbying by MADD (Mad Mothers Against Drunk Drivers).
It had been 21 previously, but during the Viet Nam war states began lowering it to 18 because you could be drafted and sent to your death at 18. It became 21 in all 50 before long.
Then MADD started screeching. We now have DAMM (Drunks Against Mad Mothers), but it hasn't caught on yet. LOL!
I agree with you. She's definitely a nazi. There are lots of people like that here in the US. And they're organized and they campaign and work towards banning this, that and the other.
LOL what a crazy bitch. I don't smoke. but saying smoking shouldnt be aloude in streets IS like...BEYOND taking freedoms away! Smoking band is stupid anyway here you can sit in the smoking section or the non smoking sec. and if u can smell it big deal she prolly smells like a french whore...should smokers be aloude to tell her not to wear purfume out of her house?
you could argue that her right to breath clean air is being taken away by smokers who smoke around her, therefore she is forced in that sense to passively smoke, and in a free country is that ok? i think not.
Since the smoking ban came in I can honestly say as a smoker it hasnt really bothered me in the slightest, not really that fussed with popping out for a ciggy.
The whole banning smoking on the streets is obviously ridiculous.
That bit about smoking areas and food areas is not really a good arguement though as smoke travels.
Anyways as some folks a have said kids shouldnt be in pubs.
LOL, well said. I'm a non-smoker, and I whole-heartedly agree with this. The smoking ban in my state outrages me; next we'll be outlawing alcohol in pubs/bars.
I basically agree with everything you have said. I dont see anything wrong with smoking being alloud within 'areas' of pubs.
Pubs stink of shit anyway so the smell wouldn't harm anybody. Children shouldn't really be in pubs in the first place unless its for a do or something. All in all everything you said is spot on.
The owner should have the right to decide whether or not they want to allow smoking. If it's a private establishment, it really shouldn't be the government's decision.
Smoking is banned by law in bars and restaurants across much of America now. The trend began in the late 1970's, and became a frenzy in the late 1980's.
Outdoor smoking is banned in some cities, and in many parks and beaches. Some communities and states are considering a ban in all housing that is not a single, detached house.
Some of these laws were enacted by various legislative bodies. Others by direct vote of citizens through ballot initiatives.
hey smoking is no different than drinking except for that maybe second hand smoking and that, but whatever if there are specialised smoking rooms as you mentioned no one has the right to bitch about it, just dont go where the smoke is and you'll be fine
In Portugal, there is a different kind of smoking ban. If your pub is below a certain size then you can decide whether you want it to be smoking or non-smoking. However, if your pub is above the given size then you can only have it being smoking if you install a special ventilation so there won't be smoke in the room.
Perhaps Britain should adopt this system instead? Because smoking areas don't work because the smoke still travels.
It should be strengthened in my opinion - smoking is absolutely pointless and whoever came up with the idea of a peice of paper wrapped around tobacco is a right squarehead
... hahaha! Omg god! i can't stop laughing! I don't agree with smoking but, tbf you should be able to do it if you want ^^ It's your life and other people shoulf just BUTT OUT! God... some people
Yep, and BTW, I don't smoke. I instinctively recognise that it is a right to treat your body as you wish. It has nothing to do with me or anyone else. The smoking ban in Pubs is 'Big Bro Government' at its best. If pub owners and its customers want to allow smokers its up to them. Im sure many Pub owners would recognise the gap in the market for non- smoking bars and have their own policies to suit and fill that need... ta dar! lol every1 is happy without Big commie Government stepping in.
if someone makes the decision to smoke , it is there right to do so is it not?
I'm sure they are old enough to make there own decision, and yes it may effect us but smokers aren't bad people they are just people that have made a decision be it wrong or right, and we should just respect that.
The only thing 'smoking wise' that we do need to worry about is the amount of publicity it is getting compared to topics actually worth talking about.
I think it should be relaxed, there should be smoking only pubs etc and non smoking pubs. I disagree with the whole freedom argument though, it isn't freedom when someone infringes on another person's freedom although I do think outlawing smoking on the street is a bit too far.
Wow, take it easy Joe. :-D. Anyway, my view: I think that the smoking ban should be kept as is only instead of having all the little smokers out in the cold having a fag, they should now build little huts for them to smoke in on the outside of every bar and restaurant. They could call them 'smog huts' and all the little smokers can go in them for a nice puff of the old funny stick. These huts can be tiny so it creates a sense of community. What say everyone else? Smog huts sound good to y'all?
i feel bad when i smoke outside on the streets and stuff because children in pushchairs now get covered with clouds of smoke and they never did before... i think smoking areas in pubs/cafes and stuff should be allowed.
I think It should be kept as normal to be honest, I don't smoke and don't like others smoking near me, but i can tolerate it. Maybe they should just tighten it up, iv'e never been to the top back of a 192 double decker without someone smoking weed
It is a freedom to choose whether you want to breath in cancerous fumes or not, but that was taken away until we had the smoking ban. You can't win either way whatever they do, why not a Dutch (I think?) system where there are seperate enclosed glass "shelters" for people to smoke within? They then have the freedom of choice whether to go in and smoke or stay out and not smoke?
I think the smoking ban is a good thing considering the harms of second hand smoke on others HOWEVER denying people the right to smoke even on the streets is ridiculous. Under that, they really wouldn't be able to go anywhere considering they would only be allowed to smoke in their home. That's just not right and that woman needs a reality check.
Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a pool. It just doesn't work like you think it does. Obviously there isn't a way to keep clean air in part of a room and smoky air in another. That's ridiculous reasoning. Besides, secondhand smoke kills over 50,000 people a year. Not cool. Smoking should be limited to outdoors only in public areas.
Interesting debate. It's not "freedom" when actions subject others to involuntary risk or infringe on rights held by others.
I'd argue that smokers should be perfectly free to pursue a smoking habit, provided that a) They are not in a position to affect anyone else, and b) They incur the TOTAL cost of their choice to smoke (i.e., any health-related expenses).
Smokers already do cover their costs for health care. How much tax is placed on a packet of fags. Don't bring up that old arguement otherwise lets make sure you don't have an ounce of extra weight on you other wise you should incur the cost of being overweight (if of course you are, but it is the same arguement.)
You're telling me that the extra cost they pay in taxes on cigarettes will be equal to or greater than the cost to treat their OWN cancer and other related illnesses? I doubt it.
Yes I am telling you that I am pretty sure that the amount that they pay in tax wil cover their treatment. Someone who smokes 20 a day will be paying around £3.50 a day in tax. Every day for lets say 30 years. More to the point not every smoker gets cancer but every smoker pays tax so yes I am saying that.
I think that freedom is the only thing that characterizes us as humans and it should not be taken away just like that... otherwise we are all going to become into animals or even worse, dictators.
PS: I don't get tired of telling you how cute you look hihi....
That woman your on about would have to be hung or beheaded as burning at the steak might possibly give me health problems from the smoke. Even none smoking friensds get ticked off because they are left on there own in the pub while us leapers are shund outside. I am trying to quit myself but this law is sooo wrong in respects to freedom of choice. Let none smoking pubs raise there prices for providing a non smoke pub as smokers pay ridiculas tax already on there habit
No, the smoking ban should be applied in every conuntry in the World. Actually, they should stop making and selling cigarettes FULL STOP. Anyone caught with them or smoking them would have jail time. It may seem stupid, but it will save a lot of lives. People die from normal smoking, and others die from passive smoking, just breathing it in from sombody else, which is even worse! Smoking should be banned in my opinion :)
Sending people to prison for smoking would cost atleast 50% of Englands population. They will have to start building prisons on the field infront of your house. Then it's you Tax Payer, paying for all of this.
Plus the death may rise because of depression and suicide in prisons.
Yeah, I guess so. But if smoking was abolished altogether, then there would be no going to prison? Ah well, I guess there's negatives and positives to everything. Which part of England are you from? And did you watch the game today?
If people don't like smoke then it's there problem
BobsAwesomeCannel 3 months ago
whatever happens in terms of smoke, Cannabis should be Legalised
tiddlywinks98712 9 months ago
It should be relaxed it in pubs and bars -- current legislation is far too restrictive!
JaysalP 1 year ago
sieg heil
futuraDUBSTEP 1 year ago
If i gave to breathe it.Get shot.
saikouxs100 1 year ago
@Nedplease In a democracy it's majority rules, and the majority of the population would rather not die of cancer. The side effects of drinking are known, but they aren't as bad as smoking. Plus when you drink it only affects one person, whereas smoking affects other people. And if society isn't there to protect citizens then what is it there for? It's not an opinion it's a fact.
Tumar695 1 year ago
@Nedplease NICE GRAMMAR IDIOT LOLOLOLOLOL
wtf weather what are you talking about
we ARE not were
Doesn't second and smoke affect people other than the smokers? imo you shouldn't compare drinking with smoking like that because drinking doesn't hurt other people. There are cases where it will hurt others when people get drunk and attack family members, but that just means that they are addicts. If they didn't have drinking they'd probably just move onto a more dangerous drug.
zorburgor 1 year ago
@Nedplease Society has a responsibility to protect the citizens that are too stupid to protect themselves. They enforce seatbelts in cars and helmets on motorbikes because it's for their own good. The only reason there hasn't been an all out ban of cigarette smoking is because you morons would cause a riot. I agree that people have a right to make their own choices but there are certain rules that are restrictions for the good of society. Smoking is easy to stop, finding a new fuel isnt...
Tumar695 1 year ago
p.s. yes i am a smoker...and i think there should be more guys like this in the world....kinda reminds me of the late great, GEORGE CARLIN...R.I.P.
MrPhinian 2 years ago
to further my last comment...yes vehicle emissions are not only confined to pubs but are a constant source every second of everyday...yet these stupid mother fucking government goers havent even bothered with banning people from getting in their fucking cars each morning!!! pisses me off
MrPhinian 2 years ago
@MrPhinian I hope you're joking because that is probably the stupidest thing i've ever read. So because there are other dangers out there we shouldn't bother trying to protect ourselves at all? The world revolves around driving and using petrol, that's just how it is. Stopping people from smoking wouldn't make the country shut down. If you can stop people from smoking then that's one thing off the list of dangers.
threelions098 1 year ago
the onlu thing i wanna say about this video regarding the smoking ban here in the uk is this....People(of the non-smoking type) are always saying that its to do with the smell and the fact that it also limits their lifespan should they have to come into contact with smoke fumes... so my question is this...what about CARS AND MOTORBIKES you dumb fuckers??? they are a constant source of airborne emmisions that will not only fuck you up(yes some people even use car emissions as a form of suicide)
MrPhinian 2 years ago
"This woman should be shot, fucking hung and excecuted all at once!" You've controdicted yourself. In a free country that wouldn't happen ;D As you said we don't live in Nazi Germany :P
phoenixtilidie 2 years ago 2
Whoah, why all the F-bombs??
My only objection to smoking is when people (this has happened when I'm at my job) put out their cigarettes on countertops.
JuliatheCoolest 2 years ago
for those who winge about smoking...why dont they fuck off, when people are smoking...smoking has been around for fucking decades, and it never used to be a problem,...retarded twats
neicey1610 2 years ago
well, what about the health of the people that serve you. They dont necessarily want to be exposed to the smoke. But the smoking in the streets thing is stupid. That is kinda taking away your freedom. I think in some states in America you cant smoke in bars either. At least I dont think you can in california
clibac 2 years ago
No you sound like a fkn hypoicrite. Against smokers but you are a gambler. Gambling fucks up the sports and you are a part of it screwing it. It's just an smoker snon smokers thing wich is very trendy at the moment.
TheDutchways 2 years ago
In Holland it's okey again to smoke in a small pub with one owner and no barkeepers.
TheDutchways 2 years ago
What about the non smokers that want to go to the bar?
MrDeverill 2 years ago
you could argue that the right not to smoke is violated when people smoke in the street, and non-smokers have to inhale the smoke.
i'm not going to revert to mindless swearing, i think the point she was making was that non-smokers have as much right, if not more, to be able to breath the air they wish to breath, which in this case is clean un-cancer-causing-air.
smoking is more dangerous than the majority of banned substances, its certainly more addictive, its just embedded in british society...
SDIB 2 years ago
i'm not having a go, just discussing you know
SDIB 2 years ago
no it shouldnt!
destroyer71 2 years ago
"We live in a freedom country. We can do what we want." Exactly, therefore I think that it is ok for her to support the smoking ban. I don't understand why you cannot accept this. I think that you are a hipocrite and should not speak about "rights as human beings" whatsoever. Next time try not to be so one-sided and choose more than one comment because a debate is when you present two sides of the story.
Ps. Was it the chavs who forced you to make a video on this topic? Sad.
aleksandra95x 2 years ago
Beer and cigarettes just go together; I live in Las Vegas, and the only place that you cannot smoke are the "nice" restaurants, but in the pubs/bars, casinos, and private offices if they choose to smoke.
Peace.
johnnyztells 2 years ago
LMAO
Good old Jordan James, agree with you on this one man.
Grom619 2 years ago
i miss having a cigarette, chip butty and a game of snooker at the same time. =(
whitestripebuzz 2 years ago
Lmao, you make me giggle. I totally agree with you. x
VodkaPrincessLS27x 2 years ago
Whatever this crazy lady thinks, the government (every one in living memory) has always walked a fine line in an effort to look like they're doing something about smoking without actually doing anything. like "we'll make them smoke outside" "we'll raise tobacco taxes by 25p"
they're never gonna do anything serious about smoking, they get maybe £10 billion a year from taxes on it. frankly, the government cant *afford* for people to stop smoking.
raybarker 2 years ago
you are the one who should be hung (not until you die but just until you realise what an idiot you are) i like your other videos but nazis? this is nowhere near what the nazis did. why do swear so much in this video? chill the "fuck" out!!! do you smoke? is that why you are getting so angry? if you do then you are even more of an idiot than you sound in this video.
SuperTravisbickle 2 years ago
lol i love how you ask us to give our opinion and then say about "use your mind we dont live in nazi germany" hahah.... so basically if people disagree they aint using there minds....
Personally i think the smoking ban is stupid ..... there were certain areas that smokers were meant to go.... and non- smokers didnt go there.. if they stunk of smoke they obv went to close to a smoking area.... in my opinion the smoking ban shud be abolished
=)
blondeandbeautiful 2 years ago
is it just me or did you get fatter ?
amirrahmedd 2 years ago
He might be from Manchester. Hmmm I dunno though but his accent sounds like it.
tassie961 2 years ago
OMG! Thought I recognized you! You put on a stone but you look great! When you were back explaining chavs, you appeared undernourished. Hope, though, you're getting on, mate.
stone412 2 years ago
Did I already ask what part of the UK are you from? I love the accent.
stone412 2 years ago
i dont actually care if people want to smoke but to be honest it is pretty gross when you're coming out of a shopping centre or something and you're just walking into this big cloud of smoke
ulookconfusedYAY 2 years ago
You're perfectly allowed to think you are free if you want to.
Its wonderful to live in a country where you're allowed to think you're free.
I think you should go back to an iconic background with all the bottles. And have an iconic shirt of some football team.
Then you could have more commentaries on contemporary issues and be an alternative to the mind control device they call a tv.
danmottsmith 2 years ago
In my opinion, smoking ought to be allowed in "pubs", night clubs, and other designated areas in cafes and such.
I live in Las Vegas, and you can smoke in bars, casinos, music venues, and up until 2008 you use to be able to smoke inside Food Markets where they have the video poker; inside 7-11's and gas stations in the section with the video poker machines you can still smoke in there.
johnnyztells 2 years ago
that something like this just drives people mad as it has to do with a legal addiction. Council tax, council estates, road tax, tv tax, mot, it's all bullshit. English people are struggling for their rights so I can understand all the frustration when something else gets taken away.
BuddhaDimple 2 years ago
Haha. I live in Canada and it's been illegal to smoke in pubs (including pub balconies and outdoor pub areas) and restaurants since the mid 90's. It's also illegal to smoke in your car if you have children in the vehicle, and it's illegal to smoke anywhere that someone else might have no other choice than to stay at (i.e. a bus stop). People get along fine with these laws. I think the problem in England, having lived here, is that English people are stripped of so many rights
BuddhaDimple 2 years ago
Smokers should only be allowed to smoke outside. My room is in the back of my building, and everyone smokes in the room outside of it because it has a door to the backyard. But even if they leave that door open while they smoke, the smoke still enters my room. I have weak lungs and the smoke makes me cough uncontrollably. So really, smoking rooms aren't foolproof. I'd prefer it if people went only outside to smoke.
xkirahatesyoux 2 years ago
I think the whole world should be changed because you are a weakling. How do you manage with vehicle fumes? I think the west needs a cull of all the sickly weaklings that are making society weak.
frenchydeepcar 2 years ago
has anyone heard the news (that in the uk) that it might be illegal to smoke outside pubs in the near future?? i couldn't believe it when i heard it :( apparently it's because barmen say they're at risk because they're breathing in the second hand smoke.. through the door or something i dunno lol
sophiejew 2 years ago
I live in Maryland of the US, and smoking is allowed anywhere in public, just not INSIDE restaurants and bars and (other public places, obviously) which that law just came around about 2 yrs. ago. However, you can smoke whereever the hell you want when your oustside, even if it's an outside restaurant.
melaniemoss94 2 years ago
Yordan your getting fatter and shave that beard just kidding, well not kidding actually, but you catch my drift ;-)
TheDutchways 2 years ago 3
i agree wv her tha smoking ban should b higher yu shouldnt b aloud to smoke any where bt your own yellow stained 4 walls!! js my opinion =]
carrotjuice2008 2 years ago
haha calm down dude lol
AdamCFCLCFC 2 years ago
Comment removed
VivaNovaYova 2 years ago
You claim that this is not Nazi Germany yet you want to shoot this woman for simply expressing her opinion. that sounds Nazi to me.
poporeborns 2 years ago
he's taking the piss. and i agree with him i think that it should be relaxed.
rushremastered07 2 years ago
pmsl mann this is mint i dont smoke myself but people should be allowed to smoke in allocated areas
atkinsm0607 2 years ago
you do realise passive smoking is more harmful than smoking yourself.
alexfoyle 2 years ago 2
how is it more harmful when the smoker is smoking the cigarette *and* the smoke around them??
sophiejew 2 years ago
haha freedom....if u want freedom then you go to the U.S.A!
carlogesualdo25 2 years ago 3
lol. i live in the usa. in washinton state you can't smoke within 25 feet of a public entrance.
willosam 2 years ago
That's about 7,5 meters. Insane and very ill.
TheDutchways 2 years ago
Get invited by the stars and let the stripes show you the way.
Oooh I love the USA.
USA forever
Western forever
TheDutchways 2 years ago
"she likes to explore" i laughed so hard at that hag.
l33tduck 2 years ago
Nazis in charge? Boy should of listened in history.
danmeiring 2 years ago
you sound more stupid than her..
we never lived under the nazis...
yodofro 2 years ago
Some of you people have been so brainwashed. Its a small stick of burning leaves. The government have just bombarded everyone with junk science to detract you from real threats to your health. All oppressive goverments have a scapegoat. The new world orders is smokers. Have you Idiots not took the time to question, why everthing blamed on smoking is increasing. Yet smoking has been decreasing. IT'S A SMOKESCREEN.
frenchydeepcar 2 years ago
You can spend your money where you like. If enough people were so opposed to smoke, there would have been loads of non-smoking pubs. Instead of loads of closed pubs. This is the most divisive law the west has ever had. The new world order want places where ordinary people meet to close. Vote UKIP the only party that wants freedom of choice.
frenchydeepcar 2 years ago
Yeah we don't live in nazi germany but you want to execute people for having the opinion that the smoking ban should be further continued... No comment needed on that.
Also yeah i wouldn't have a problem if it caused no damage what so ever but it's disgusting and every year smoking related illnesses take much of our national health services' funding
Normally i'm a fan of you but god that's such a closed minded opinion you should go back to what people keep telling you , be the funny guy.
slipjim 2 years ago
I think the smoking ban should stay at it is, but there should be pubs dedicated just for smoking and drinking - no family meals etc. I'm not a fan of smoke, it makes my asthma really bad so I'm trying to get my dad to quit.
Also, agreed about the lady lol.
EvieDaEmo 2 years ago
the thing is though people who think it's 'cool' to smoke around others... i don't mind if people smoke when they're not IN your face. they should be allowed to smoke outside or in bars.
BUT i went to this underage festival and there were 2 girls smoking, and everybody was literally crushed up against each other with no space to move and they were burning people and they didn't give a crap. plus it stank, thats a bit rude.. aha
hollseey 2 years ago
I agree. People take it too far. The argument that it's bad for the health of you & folk around you. What fucking isn't these days? Alcohol is a bigger killer than smoking or second hand so why not do away with that too? This dickhead ban should not only be relaxed but completely lifted. As long as there is a seperate, designated area for smokers or non-smokers, then what's the fucking deal? If they don't like it for whatever reason then fuck off out of it. Wtf happend to freedom?
GreenHairedGoony 2 years ago
Your fat and look weird >.>
Hackedlolz 2 years ago
yeah he pretty chubby now ha ha who ate all the pies...lol
tbrowniscool 2 years ago
i don't think it should be relaxed, but i think all clubs and pubs should have an outside, heated covered area where smokers can go and smoke happily, because a bunch of smokers standing outside a pub blowing it in your face before you go in side is not nice, but its also not fair to completely take the right to smoke in a pub away either
xxerubadhrielxx 2 years ago
cigarette smoke is just a tiny bit of all the shit thats already goin on in the air we breathe. Its retarded that we cant smoke right next to a fucking car that if breathed in the air it was emmiting for ten seconds would fucking kill you.
tank6603 2 years ago 6
more of these vids please jordon
GonkNebraska 2 years ago 6
you've let out the anger ive kept inside! it fair enough if people dont want to breathe in other peoples smoke but they cant make us stand outside and THEN tell us smoking is anti-social. we'd be sitting inside with the non-smokers having a banter if it wasn't for those knobs.
DaisySpree09 2 years ago 4
Jordan, I agree with you.
I dont see what people's problems are, because little do they know, that the money taxed from smoking and smoking products goes towards the NHS.
The very health system that a lot of these hypochondriac non smokers abuse.
Besides, theres no scientific evidence that second hand smoke kills.
Second hand smoke is oxidised, its nothing more than visible air with a smell.
higofyp 2 years ago 2
Ciggerette taxes pay for the NHS to provide new lungs for smokers :)
phoenixtilidie 2 years ago
Not all taxes from cigarettes go to the NHS, only a small slice!
FabFM 2 years ago
Jordan, are you a smoker by chance?moking in enclosed places is unpleasent especially in resturants or in buildings which handle food. Plus the main reason the ban came in was to protect workers (waitresses/waiters) from secondhand smoke. It is unfair that people should have to put up with somebody sucking on a fag in the corner while they try to eat a nice meal. Smokers should have the respect to go outside to smoke anyway; ban or no ban. Rarely disagree with you Jordan but this time I do.
phoenixtilidie 2 years ago 2
If there were both smoking and non-smoking establishments, I'm sure there are enough smoking and non-smoking workers to serve all establishments. Any worker so offended by smoke and so stupid to go to work in a smoking establishment doesn't deserve a law protecting their stupidity. Neither do stupid diners. The law went too far in banning smoking in all establishments. Personal responsibility, not government nanny-ism would have been a better way to go.
whiskersneighbour 2 years ago 3
pubs stink of piss now
smoke used to mask the smell now all you can smell are the toilets
NeffniGone 2 years ago 3
maybe there should be a toilet ban now
lol joke
i would rather smell piss than cigs though, my local used to be poor ventilated, so on a busy night you could see jeack all, and they would put fans on the bar, so when you went to order, smoke would be in your face and the bar maid is fine.
=|
roses845 2 years ago
somking areas would be good
coz when ever i go out in lesta there is a smoking area
so me and my mates just go and have a fag every now and then
i think it be a good idea for it to have smoking area
not that because i do smoke
just because its alot easyer and more pubs will be getting custemers through the door coz i notice ever since the smoking ban has come in not many people went to the pubs coz you had to go outside for a fag
people just like to drink and smoke at home nower days
lilrockere 2 years ago 4
it should be relaxed lmfao. i live here in england and as i don't smoke myself and dont really see the point to be honest but i dont think it should be banned. it should be allowed in pubs and in football stadiums. why you can't smoke at a footie game anyway i don't know,i mean there is a huge fucking hole where the celing should be!
dimebag4lyfe 2 years ago 2
I JUST LOLLED.
lipsyman 2 years ago
I dont think ther should have been a smoking ban in the first place...if u didnt want the smoke in your face move then and that stupid fukin women ....smokin ban in the streets ? wot is she on
neicey1610 2 years ago 4
But - Smoking is annoyin and anti-social... Should be allowed in the streets, but not in enclosed places... And no we are not in a free country - No where is...
zeldja 2 years ago
:o Facial Hair...
zeldja 2 years ago
Tbh i really dont mind the smell of smokers but that is just oppinion and take away someones freedom to smoke is fucking rediculas!!
BKsMassive 2 years ago 2
Here in California, some localities have banned outdoor smoking. Some landlords don't allow smoking and will evict you if you do. Anti-smoking activists are trying to enact a statewide ban of smoking in condos and apartments because smoke might waft out of your unit and disturb your neighbours and any passersby.
whiskersneighbour 2 years ago 3
Regarding pubs and restaurants, I think it should be okay for owners to have their establishment either smoking or nonsmoking, but CLEARLY SIGNED. Then, if smoking offends you, keep your ass out of smoking establishments and go somewhere else. That would preserve freedom and choice for everyone. The free market would dictate success or failure of the establishments.
whiskersneighbour 2 years ago 4
That is a good point, @whiskersneighbour!
The pub owner should be able to choose and clearly label their shop; that would make far much more sense.
But banning smoking on the street is definitely ridiculous!
I'm not even a smoker but i think this law is totally stupid because everyone should have the right to smoke when and where they want to!
Okay, maybe not inside a classroom or workplace but a PUB or on the STREET in the open air! Definitely!
taschatokio93 2 years ago 3
wtf?
what age do u have to be to drink in america btw?
BKsMassive 2 years ago 2
The drinking age has traditionally been left to the states to determine. It is currently back up to age 21 in all 50 states due to lobbying by MADD (Mad Mothers Against Drunk Drivers).
It had been 21 previously, but during the Viet Nam war states began lowering it to 18 because you could be drafted and sent to your death at 18. It became 21 in all 50 before long.
Then MADD started screeching. We now have DAMM (Drunks Against Mad Mothers), but it hasn't caught on yet. LOL!
whiskersneighbour 2 years ago 3
should be "It became 18 in all 50 before long."
whiskersneighbour 2 years ago
The drinking age here in the U.S. is 21. Ridiculous, I know.
PlannedObsolescence 2 years ago
not for me haha. seriously though it is fucking ridiculous.
BucketPukes1969 2 years ago
I agree with you. She's definitely a nazi. There are lots of people like that here in the US. And they're organized and they campaign and work towards banning this, that and the other.
loryncle 2 years ago 2
LOL what a crazy bitch. I don't smoke. but saying smoking shouldnt be aloude in streets IS like...BEYOND taking freedoms away! Smoking band is stupid anyway here you can sit in the smoking section or the non smoking sec. and if u can smell it big deal she prolly smells like a french whore...should smokers be aloude to tell her not to wear purfume out of her house?
shesapartygurl 2 years ago 3
man you look fat
09rosepunk 2 years ago
Dude, how much weight have you put on?
ALLINKNOTS 2 years ago
you could argue that her right to breath clean air is being taken away by smokers who smoke around her, therefore she is forced in that sense to passively smoke, and in a free country is that ok? i think not.
SDIB 2 years ago
Since the smoking ban came in I can honestly say as a smoker it hasnt really bothered me in the slightest, not really that fussed with popping out for a ciggy.
The whole banning smoking on the streets is obviously ridiculous.
That bit about smoking areas and food areas is not really a good arguement though as smoke travels.
Anyways as some folks a have said kids shouldnt be in pubs.
Keep up the good work.
okse 2 years ago 2
LOL, well said. I'm a non-smoker, and I whole-heartedly agree with this. The smoking ban in my state outrages me; next we'll be outlawing alcohol in pubs/bars.
rainbowsandwar 2 years ago 2
I basically agree with everything you have said. I dont see anything wrong with smoking being alloud within 'areas' of pubs.
Pubs stink of shit anyway so the smell wouldn't harm anybody. Children shouldn't really be in pubs in the first place unless its for a do or something. All in all everything you said is spot on.
Jordcuk 2 years ago 3
It's certainly not the smell that people worry about - it's the carcinogenic chemicals IN the smell.
l0gically 2 years ago
The owner should have the right to decide whether or not they want to allow smoking. If it's a private establishment, it really shouldn't be the government's decision.
AutosuggestionJD 2 years ago 3
Pubs should have the right to decide whether they allow smoking or not. It's not for the government to decide.
This is why America is superior.
EmberflyLayouts 2 years ago
america sucks ass
SDIB 2 years ago
Smoking is banned by law in bars and restaurants across much of America now. The trend began in the late 1970's, and became a frenzy in the late 1980's.
Outdoor smoking is banned in some cities, and in many parks and beaches. Some communities and states are considering a ban in all housing that is not a single, detached house.
Some of these laws were enacted by various legislative bodies. Others by direct vote of citizens through ballot initiatives.
whiskersneighbour 2 years ago 2
This is quite false.
EmberflyLayouts 2 years ago
You are quite full of shit.
whiskersneighbour 2 years ago
"this women should be shot fucking hung and executed all at once,the dumb bitch"
lolololol
agreed!
There was a smoking ban enacted In my state in the US . Hookah bars were then closed! YOU GO THERE SPECIFICALLY TO SMOKE!
Great video
mkr188 2 years ago
hey smoking is no different than drinking except for that maybe second hand smoking and that, but whatever if there are specialised smoking rooms as you mentioned no one has the right to bitch about it, just dont go where the smoke is and you'll be fine
TheBraziliantV 2 years ago 4
In Portugal, there is a different kind of smoking ban. If your pub is below a certain size then you can decide whether you want it to be smoking or non-smoking. However, if your pub is above the given size then you can only have it being smoking if you install a special ventilation so there won't be smoke in the room.
Perhaps Britain should adopt this system instead? Because smoking areas don't work because the smoke still travels.
welshchick1993 2 years ago 3
It should be strengthened in my opinion - smoking is absolutely pointless and whoever came up with the idea of a peice of paper wrapped around tobacco is a right squarehead
StapledNote 2 years ago
1934?!
ferron321 2 years ago 4
OMG ur a fucking legend!!! :D
BKsMassive 2 years ago
... hahaha! Omg god! i can't stop laughing! I don't agree with smoking but, tbf you should be able to do it if you want ^^ It's your life and other people shoulf just BUTT OUT! God... some people
-Rolls eyes-
Ly ^^ x
SmexiiVampire 2 years ago
Honestly your best Video.
Its just kinda fun how people that never even smoked say that it should be forbidden to smoke on the streets.
well I do smoke and if it would not be allowed then i'd probably kill myself or something :'D
cathii2506 2 years ago
She comes from the Nazi era and so does the mainstream media and so does the Government. We need to wake up to this fact.
MewHamHead 2 years ago
Well that's true. Shame others don't realize it.
FunnyPranks 2 years ago
Yep, and BTW, I don't smoke. I instinctively recognise that it is a right to treat your body as you wish. It has nothing to do with me or anyone else. The smoking ban in Pubs is 'Big Bro Government' at its best. If pub owners and its customers want to allow smokers its up to them. Im sure many Pub owners would recognise the gap in the market for non- smoking bars and have their own policies to suit and fill that need... ta dar! lol every1 is happy without Big commie Government stepping in.
MewHamHead 2 years ago 4
Ey mate I subscribed to ya !
SilentAgent58 2 years ago 2
i think ALL smokers should be hung drawn and quarted ... i hate the smell of it
DangerousDan777 2 years ago
I blow smoke at your aunties.
MewHamHead 2 years ago
thb i like the smell xD
BKsMassive 2 years ago
fuckin hilairious man, your best video yet,
plus, you couldn't have more of a point, but gone are the days of cigars at a poker table
joedinho1748 2 years ago 3
Thank you, i really appreciate that after some retard said they where un-subscribing to me because of this video.. Some people need mental help.
FunnyPranks 2 years ago
pricks, nah its a sound video, sideboards are a bit dodgy, mind
joedinho1748 2 years ago
if someone makes the decision to smoke , it is there right to do so is it not?
I'm sure they are old enough to make there own decision, and yes it may effect us but smokers aren't bad people they are just people that have made a decision be it wrong or right, and we should just respect that.
The only thing 'smoking wise' that we do need to worry about is the amount of publicity it is getting compared to topics actually worth talking about.
Jessssshrooooom 2 years ago
they should let yall smoke anywhere you want. if they dont like it they can fuck off outta there
Anarchistlyism 2 years ago
I think it should be relaxed, there should be smoking only pubs etc and non smoking pubs. I disagree with the whole freedom argument though, it isn't freedom when someone infringes on another person's freedom although I do think outlawing smoking on the street is a bit too far.
Mattspageofapathy 2 years ago 3
Wow, take it easy Joe. :-D. Anyway, my view: I think that the smoking ban should be kept as is only instead of having all the little smokers out in the cold having a fag, they should now build little huts for them to smoke in on the outside of every bar and restaurant. They could call them 'smog huts' and all the little smokers can go in them for a nice puff of the old funny stick. These huts can be tiny so it creates a sense of community. What say everyone else? Smog huts sound good to y'all?
VengaboysRbackINtown 2 years ago 4
i feel bad when i smoke outside on the streets and stuff because children in pushchairs now get covered with clouds of smoke and they never did before... i think smoking areas in pubs/cafes and stuff should be allowed.
harleystarraw 2 years ago
I think It should be kept as normal to be honest, I don't smoke and don't like others smoking near me, but i can tolerate it. Maybe they should just tighten it up, iv'e never been to the top back of a 192 double decker without someone smoking weed
DannyReddy17 2 years ago
I both agree and disagree.....
It is a freedom to choose whether you want to breath in cancerous fumes or not, but that was taken away until we had the smoking ban. You can't win either way whatever they do, why not a Dutch (I think?) system where there are seperate enclosed glass "shelters" for people to smoke within? They then have the freedom of choice whether to go in and smoke or stay out and not smoke?
DonSimonUK 2 years ago
I think the smoking ban is a good thing considering the harms of second hand smoke on others HOWEVER denying people the right to smoke even on the streets is ridiculous. Under that, they really wouldn't be able to go anywhere considering they would only be allowed to smoke in their home. That's just not right and that woman needs a reality check.
iris51592 2 years ago
Wow, you changed dude... Anyway sure not smoking in the Street is way to far. But smoking in Oubs are bars is kind of unfair on others that don't.
Oldredtank 2 years ago 2
Ahhhh...finally your back!
BTW this is Samuel, from TalkingTeens!
Supernature06 2 years ago
Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a pool. It just doesn't work like you think it does. Obviously there isn't a way to keep clean air in part of a room and smoky air in another. That's ridiculous reasoning. Besides, secondhand smoke kills over 50,000 people a year. Not cool. Smoking should be limited to outdoors only in public areas.
Love your videos!
MandaPanda009 2 years ago 4
lol that's a good analogy.
l0gically 2 years ago
After this rant I'm unsubscribing..
teenwolf67 2 years ago
Interesting debate. It's not "freedom" when actions subject others to involuntary risk or infringe on rights held by others.
I'd argue that smokers should be perfectly free to pursue a smoking habit, provided that a) They are not in a position to affect anyone else, and b) They incur the TOTAL cost of their choice to smoke (i.e., any health-related expenses).
l0gically 2 years ago
Smokers already do cover their costs for health care. How much tax is placed on a packet of fags. Don't bring up that old arguement otherwise lets make sure you don't have an ounce of extra weight on you other wise you should incur the cost of being overweight (if of course you are, but it is the same arguement.)
creaton1976 2 years ago
You're telling me that the extra cost they pay in taxes on cigarettes will be equal to or greater than the cost to treat their OWN cancer and other related illnesses? I doubt it.
l0gically 2 years ago
Yes I am telling you that I am pretty sure that the amount that they pay in tax wil cover their treatment. Someone who smokes 20 a day will be paying around £3.50 a day in tax. Every day for lets say 30 years. More to the point not every smoker gets cancer but every smoker pays tax so yes I am saying that.
creaton1976 2 years ago 2
Nice sideburns mate : )
solidkid95 2 years ago
I think that freedom is the only thing that characterizes us as humans and it should not be taken away just like that... otherwise we are all going to become into animals or even worse, dictators.
PS: I don't get tired of telling you how cute you look hihi....
missekat0210 2 years ago
you need a shave
slamt08 2 years ago 2
Need/Want..
FunnyPranks 2 years ago
people shud be able 2 do whatevaa they want
jasonthemong 2 years ago
we are far far far far far away from what we call, free.
razryan 2 years ago
The smoking ban should not be relaxed at all. AT ALL
ToManyPhones 2 years ago 2
Although it should NOT be extended. Leave it be.
ToManyPhones 2 years ago
gggffffffgttttttt
BrokenClocks08 2 years ago
So when are you going to do a video about women? :-)
KevinSolway 2 years ago
That woman your on about would have to be hung or beheaded as burning at the steak might possibly give me health problems from the smoke. Even none smoking friensds get ticked off because they are left on there own in the pub while us leapers are shund outside. I am trying to quit myself but this law is sooo wrong in respects to freedom of choice. Let none smoking pubs raise there prices for providing a non smoke pub as smokers pay ridiculas tax already on there habit
videomonkey2009 2 years ago
wow that woman is a cunt l0l
CoBRA0245 2 years ago
No, the smoking ban should be applied in every conuntry in the World. Actually, they should stop making and selling cigarettes FULL STOP. Anyone caught with them or smoking them would have jail time. It may seem stupid, but it will save a lot of lives. People die from normal smoking, and others die from passive smoking, just breathing it in from sombody else, which is even worse! Smoking should be banned in my opinion :)
PS: Who watched the derby game today? UNITEEDD :D
RemixRewind 2 years ago 2
Sending people to prison for smoking would cost atleast 50% of Englands population. They will have to start building prisons on the field infront of your house. Then it's you Tax Payer, paying for all of this.
Plus the death may rise because of depression and suicide in prisons.
FunnyPranks 2 years ago
Yeah, I guess so. But if smoking was abolished altogether, then there would be no going to prison? Ah well, I guess there's negatives and positives to everything. Which part of England are you from? And did you watch the game today?
RemixRewind 2 years ago
Manchester, im a united fan, yeah i saw it. Also blame the government. They love the money they make off um.
FunnyPranks 2 years ago
I live in Manchester as well! ;D
And I'm a united fan. Owen's goal @ 96th minute! :O :D
RemixRewind 2 years ago
I'm a non smoker, never have never will, but tbh, you're spot on. This woman sounds like some Middle Class Guardian-y toff.
PositiveTension505 2 years ago
If you dont want be round smoking pubs THEN DONT GO TO THEM & WE WONT GO TO THE NON SMOKING ONES Its That Bloody Simple. Free country my arse
videomonkey2009 2 years ago
Excellent comment.
FunnyPranks 2 years ago
hmm... to the indoor public place ban, it shouldn't be relaxed. it's a health risk.
outdoor public places... i didn't know there was a law on this, but if there is, it should be relaxed.
youhatemenoww 2 years ago
tell em tell em!
cornpopsandacid 2 years ago
labour are shit
MrRAndom5 2 years ago
wow swearing
IamPUDDiiN 2 years ago
1st :)
AlyKid2k8 2 years ago