How can anyone believe in this bullcrap? If evolution was true then then the damn monkeys would still be turning into nude humans in every zoo around the world.
Someone please give me proof.......create life from non-life, not in a cartoon video, not on a chart but a living organism from where there was none. You can explain how you THINK it happened so do it!
You don't understand! Evolution can't be true for two reasons. 1) I don't understand it (so therefore it can't be true) and 2) I really really believe it was something else. And as we all know, reality is directly affected by the majorities belief system. And by Majority I mean mine. Hence, God did it.
@mtbee9 I was putting myself in the shoes of Kent Hovind and ShockofGod when I wrote that statement. Hovind, in his video "100 reasons why evolution is stupid" several times refers to #1. "I just don't see how that can happen, seems stupid" And Shock is infamous of talking about how christianity is real, but if you ask him about other religions he laughs at how fake they are
This is a lie!According to Islam all things created as it is..There is no such thing as Evolution.Evolution is a bullshit theory created by bullshit people.You can find this mind twisted people among the western educated people.This kind of believe system is changing rapidly..many have come to the truth by accepting Islam.yes Islam is the only truth.That is why Islam is the fastest growing religion In North America and Europe.Another name for evolution is Infidel "bull shit theory".Salam!
@anticorncob6 "This is a lie!According to Islam all things created as it is" Well science has proved that wrong - sorry Evolution is considered fact by those who actually understand it. If it disagrees with your religion then your religion is wrong. Don't worry - there plenty of others to choose from!
"many have come to the truth by accepting Islam." Yep and many have realized there is no evidence to support its claims and seen religion for what it is! Ancient mythology. Salami to you too!
As far as the lanugo is concerned, the conjecture that it may be the body's response to the fetus' lack of insulating fat seems as though it may be backed up by the fact that sufferers of anorexia nervosa also develop a light coat of hair over their bodies and faces.
As for the whale "hind limbs", they, along with the "pelvis", which are not the same from one gender to the other, apparently serve a reproductive function.
As far as the dolphin embryo is concerned (beginning around the 37 minute mark), it is idiotically presumptuous and untrue to state that "the only possible explanation" is evolution, and that the ONLY alternative is to state that it was a matter of arbitrary choice by the Creator. Is there no stupidity cut off point for professors??!!
"A record so patchy, that we know only anywhere between one one-hundredth of one percent to one percent of the species that ever lived." So our maximum knowledge of the history of life is only one percent." (Raises hand) Professor Coyne, if we only know of a maximum of one percent of the history of life, then how do we know that it is one f**king percent?
There could not have been an episode of South Park based around this guy's (Jerry Coyne's) smugness, because it would simply have evaporated all life in the universe. Not only is he smug, but completely ignorant. How exactly does a materialist go about describing anything, especially the fact that what he considers a low percentage of people in the U.S. believe in evolution, as reprehensible, bad, etc.? A materialist cannot state such things without violating his own supposed position.
Well obviously you're wrong as Evolution is clearly Science and not a religion, but just for kicks please explain where do atheists go to worship 'no god' and what form does this so called religion take.
Your explanation should bear in mind the definition of Religion: "the service and worship of God or the supernatural". Merriam webster.
@jamiesbond007 you are using a secondary definition of the word 'religion', not its primary definition. The primary definition of religion requires the concept of deity in a body of worship in order for that to be classified as religion. Does evolution have any concept of deity? No. Therefore, according to the PRIMARY definition of religion, evolution is not a religion. Please stick to this definition, and stop exploiting the ambiguity in English language.
Jerry the fairy is living a fairytale. He talks about "cowardly and intellectually dishonest actions" but forgets to remind us that no university quotes him and no university considers him reasonable.
However all higher-learning institutions respect Albert Einstein who wrote
"A legitimate conflict between science and religion cannot exist. Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." - Albert Einstein
when science explain something is due to explain to the last doubt, but when is about a holy book is just my holy book say it an that is it, when religion is ask for evidence the only source is the holy book and that is enough, NO is not get over there is no god, evidence is required, we don't believe in evolution, we accept it based in evidence is real and is a fact.
Ever since the world was created, energy has been in a constant state of decay. The THEORY of evolution is saying that energy is becoming more complex to form cells and such. Ridiculous.. only fools turn to thing such as evolution. God made the world.
@Planetarify Unfortunately you, like someone who can't spell or smells bad, are unaware of what is wrong but that is obvious to others. Your pathetic pseudo-scientific comment about energy is just so half-baked I won't bother with it. You are ignorant of the use of the term 'theory' in science. Perhaps you should inform yourself. What possible explanatory power is derived from saying God made the world? What medicine or technology can be derived from 'God did it'. God of the morons did it.
@Planetarify You want me to give you hard proof? What's in it for me? The silly mind games that occultists and frauds usually play are not of any interest to me excepting to witness the strange twists and turns of a mind in manacles. The 'holy' texts are manuals for ruthless and deceitful men. They learn about textual deconstruction and how to use the texts to hold on to their 'flock'. Islam is quite clear about this, it aims for you to submit and become a willing slave not just a sheep.
@Planetarify Evolution has been proven and witnessed in microscopic animals... For an example.. The one celled Euglena evolved antennas to light their path in the dark depths of the seas. If you say that evolution is just a theory... SO IS GRAVITY!! You might now say.. No gravity is a scientific fact... Yes.. But everything starts with theorys to see and try to understand how everything works... For an example.. People once thought that the earth was flat.. We now know its round. thx to science.
@Findsomthingright "if we examine the fossil record in detail, whether at the level of orders or of species, we find ... not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion of one group.
You've obviously been reading the wrong books.That is not written in any science book I've ever read!
Perhaps it was from a lying creationist website. They have to lie as they cannot accept the truth.
@mtbee9 Evolutionist scientist, Derek A.Ager, in the book, Nature of the fossil record: ((The point emerges that if we examine the fossil record in detail,
whether at the level of orders or of species, we find—over and
over again—not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion of ((one group
I don't know, did you ever heard about the term ((Cambrian Age)) ?? did you
@Findsomthingright "over and over again—not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion "
Evidence points to both periods of slower and more rapid evolution (such as the end of the Cambrian period). The Dinosaur extinction is a period when a castastrophy wiped out many species leaving environments for the survivors (mammals) to evolve into. This has happened many times.
In between these 'rapid' events are periods of slower evolution. 'Rapid' in this context is 30 MY or so.
@mtbee9Which evidences are you talking about, it's in your mind only i think, evolutionists have been making strenuous efforts to find fossils since the middle of the
the nineteen century all over the world, no transitional forms
have yet been uncovered. All the fossils unearthed in excavations
showed that, contrary to the expectations of
evolutionists, life appeared on earth all of a sudden and
@Findsomthingright Paleontologists "have been making strenuous efforts to find fossils". Yes they have and they have thousands of specimens. Many transitional forms of whales, horses, dinosaurs, birds, fish, humans etc. have been found. Archeopteryx, Tiktaalik being notable specimens. You definitely have not been reading the right books. "fully-formed," Of course they're fully formed. They were all distinct animals!
You do not understand Evolution. I suggest you study what you argue against!
@Findsomthingright cont. "therefore, no evolution" Why do you argue against something that you do not understand. It behoves you to learn about and save you from coming out with statements that are totally wrong! Sounds like you been reading Creationists sites that lie about it as they know if they told you the facts that you would probably accept it, so they misrepresent Evolution because they cannot stand the fact they are losing the argument!
@mtbee9 what i think a transitional form is? For instance, some half-fish/half-reptiles should have lived in the past which had acquired some reptilian traits in addition to the fish traits they already had. Or there should have existed some reptile-birds, which acquiredsome bird traits in addition to the reptilian traits they already had. ....... Evolutionists refer to these imaginary creatures, which they believe to have lived in the past, as “transitional forms.”
@Findsomthingright "some reptilian traits in addition to the fish traits" Precisely what Tiktaalik is, an animal with traits of fish and amphibians.
"reptile-birds, which acquiredsome bird traits in addition to the reptilian traits" Well Dino-birds actually. But that is what we see with Archeopteryx bird like wings and feathers, yet Dinosaur type teeth.
Sorry but transitional forms do exist. You choose not to acknowledge them.
@mtbee9 "some reptilian traits in addition to the fish traits" Precisely what Tiktaalik is?? What are you talking about ?? There a 120-million-year-old fossil tortoise in is proof that reptiles are not descended from other living things, never underwent any intermediate stages, and have maintained exactly the same structure for millions of years, nice playing whith you
@Findsomthingright newly discovered dinosaurs with feathers also show the transition from reptiles to primitive birds. People in the past suspected this all along, but no one had ever discovered dinosaurs with feathers, but now we do. New evidence just keeps coming in, and they all support evolution. You seen the movie Jurassic Park? Remember the raptors? Today's palaeontologists will actually tell you the design of those raptors is wrong in the film, they should have feathers covering them.
@Casshyr There a 37 to 23-million-year-old fossil of a turtle, there is no defrence between it and what we have today, what are you talking about,darwinists should be able to explain the development of a turtle's shell, they should be able to show how the structure developed by chance through an imaginary process of evolution and produce proof of it. But to explain the development of living creatures, darwinists only resort to stories
@Findsomthingright "But to explain the development of living creatures, darwinists only resort to stories" => no, not stories. How evolution studies work is we look at what we can see today, and we form theories on what happened in the past. Are they 100% correct? Probably not. But they are our best guesses nevertheless, without resorting to supernatural talks. If you disagree with their theories, you need to provide evidence why u disagree. Simply saying "it's just a guess" is not good enough.
@Findsomthingright There are indeed reports on how a turtle shell develop. Go to google scholar and type "turtle shell evolution". Are they facts? No. But are they stories? No. They are theories backed up by scientific evidence. To debunk those evidence, you need to first read those articles, and point out what's wrong with the evidence presented. Again, it is important for you to realize simply saying "that's not proof, that's just a guess" is not a scientific criticism.
@Casshyr that is the beauty of science is not a dogma, new information and evidence come out old or false is discarted and have to be tested against evidence, if is no evidence such and such theory is rejected or in the case of the age of earth, older the sample we have older the earth, the evidence is there, but you need to train your eyes and mid to ask the right questions, and to observe the evidence like detective
@legolasgreenleaff " new information and evidence come out old or false is discarted and have to be tested against evidence" => totally agree, but creationists have not presented any evidence to discard evolution. Their classical arguments "lack of transitional fossils", "irreducible complexity", "no beneficial mutations" have all been debunked. And they also don't seem to understand you can't use God in your reasoning unless you can first prove God's existence scientifically.
@Casshyr maybe iwas not clear, i accept evolution, i already read: why evolution is true, the greatest show in earth and what are the fossils and what they say, and i knew a lot of the evidence but isolated when you put together you agree with the evidence and accept the scientific theory of evolution as a fact, in the words of russel wallace evolution left no room for god, and for god is no evidence besides a mountain of emotional garbage, thanks enjoy the only life you will ever have
@legolasgreenleaff being a theistic evolutionist, i don't think evolution left no room for God, and neither do i treat evolution as a scientific fact. It's simply the best explanation we have so far, considering the alternatives. I personally think people who think evolution disproves any concept of God is being a bigot. Evolution only disproves creationism, or more specifically, the creationism as described in Quran + Bible.
@؟؟mtbee9 what i think a transitional form is? ,for instance, some half-fish/half-reptiles should have lived in the past which had acquired some reptilian traits in addition to the fish traits they already had. Or there should have existed some reptile-birds, which acquiredsome bird traits in addition to the reptilian traits they already had. Evolutionists refer to these imaginary creatures, which they believe to have lived in the past, as “transitional forms.”
@MarcusEFN yet what is the difference in the end-at least I know I belive in something that exists which is my creator. However, think what you want, ill pray for you friend.
i dont like he was pushing the idea of abiogenisis, i cant find any convincing research that can reproduce it. i find panspermia more likely for our case, extremophiles were some of the first micro organisms.
they found human remains of a 10ft man in mexico said to be millions of years ago, so how come they were taller then apposed to now... when evolution says we came from a worm, then a worm with legs, then a worm with legs and arms, then a monkey and then humans... the evolution of humans are getting bigger? so why was there a 10ft man millions of years ago. goes against human evolution?
@Gubbible How about you start by showing me the scientific journal article of the 10 m man found in mexico ... what no reliable sources for it...haha PWNED
@Gubbible Youtube ISN"T A VALID SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL ARTICLE ... and why does it have to recognised by science you say, because the scientific method is the best method we have at determining causes of natural phenomena, otherwise your you tube link aint worth shit. Yep I'm dumb for being smarter than you, sorry how does that make sense? fucking clusterfuck of stupid
@Gubbible Hang on, i mean your the fucking dickhead making the fucking claim that theres a 10 m skeleton in mexico. How about you back it up. You are demanding I what, prove you wrong. Burden of proof is on the person making the claim dickhead, youtube vids simply don't cut it fucktard. Go fuck a sheep or something fucking inbred hick.
@Gubbible No fucktard the burden of proof is yours. There are fairies in my backyard, what don't believeme, PROVE ME WRONG. Haha fucking stupid cunt doesn't know what a fallacy is. Stupid cunt.
@Oddessuss your saying its lies, why should i believe your word? over that video?.... oh thats right? because you said so? YOU SAID SO? no one else... JUST YOU! stupid ass.. i believe that video is true... so prove to me that its false. and ill believe you? OH YOU CANT, thats right... your dumb!! you can't prove its false.. stupid ass! my proof is that video.. now come up with a good argument to disprove the video dickhead!!!
@Oddessuss hahahaha look at you, since your against what i believe in, tell me what you believe in?, cause your not answering any of my questions, and yes i did check up on his sources. 1 step ahead of you mate, i mean idiot that opens his mouth but cant prove anything he says
@Gubbible your saying its lies, why should i believe your word? over that video?.... oh thats right? because you said so? YOU SAID SO? no one else... JUST YOU! stupid ass.. i believe that video is true... so prove to me that its false. and ill believe you? OH YOU CANT, thats right... your dumb!! you can't prove its false.. stupid ass! my proof is that video.. now come up with a good argument to disprove the video dickhead!!!
Also I'm not sure why you would think it would be relevant to declare that some atheists don' t accept the theory. That would perfectly fit the definition of a non sequitur and makes me suspicious of your knowledge of the topic. Read Mudflappus's comment. Then read it again. If it isn't apparent to you why evolution is as accepted as it is then you need you go home wrap your head in aluminum foil then gently place it in the oven.
@bbree333 stupid doesnt class as establish. if u beleive that an ape used to fuck ur grand mother so be it but dont expect us to beleive so, i once up on a time ur grand mother used to be an ameba thats up to u fine by me. tell me how does a mechonism that produces les and less creates more and more? coz in evolution the stronger live the weaker dies so how r there so many species from since life was formed? wouldnt the stronger out lived the weaker? then how so many species if so?
Can someone shove a cock in these christians mouths already? Evolution is as accepted as the periodic table due to its power to predict. The real question is is that does being a buffoon fundamentalist make survival easier? Scary if it were.
@beedip84 Judging from your spelling and looking at the rest of your well thought out, asserted and grammatically correct comments it has become apparent that a conversation with my red brick wall would not only be more productive than one with you but also more interesting. For fear of devolution by association with profound idiocy I will go ahead and refuse to engage you further in conversation.
This is an emotional respones and makes the false claim about evolution being as accepted as the period table. In reality, there are many scientists, even atheists who admit is isfaulty but simply "the best we have". Please, if you have any rational reasons for believing in evolution, reply to this. otherwise, let's not be arbitrary and emotional.
@Japeth555 Right you are about the emotional response. Sometimes this happens. But in the very message that you send you imply that I don't have a rational reason to accept the theory but I believe I clearly stated in my comment that it is accepted due to its PREDICTIVE POWER. If that is not a rational reason to you than you are patently have no reasoning ability and are guilty of the very same accusation that you make. continued....
@derangius What "predictive power"? the theory of evolution has never contributed to any new technologies or advances in the medical field. It really is not neccessary to believe in order to do good science. I understand that whetehr someone believes something or not doesnt make it valid or invalid, i was simply arguing along your lines. but I must ask, why do you believ irt is we can reason at all? How do you know your senses and memory are reliable or that scientific laws will always work?
@Japeth555 One example of predictive power would be that information in genes is transmitted molecularly in a very precise way but not quite perfectly which allows for slight variations. Because of this Idea biologists have discovered DNA with its mutation rate of 10-9 per nucleotide per cell division. Instead of relying on a random internet guy for information on the subject why not look it up. There are many fine examples of the theory's power to predict.
@derangius Here you misunderstand what i believe. I am un full accordancw with what you just posted about variation and information exchange. This isnt the evolution Im talking about. Of cource new species come about, but they all stay within the boundaries of their "kinds" (mamoths and elephnats related, camels and llamas, etc.) And why should that be an irrelevant question?
@Japeth555 There is no misunderstanding on what you believe. I did not make an attempt to pretend to know what you think. I was simply trying to assert the predictive power of the evolutionary theory. I don't know how it could be communicated in an easier way. Maybe it's my fault for not knowing how to explain.
@Japeth555 "new species come about, but they all stay within the boundaries of their "kinds"'
So what was Archeopteryx? A bird with teeth and other dinosaur features or a dinosaur with feathers and other bird like features.
After you answer that we can move on to all of the other species that have existed that don't fall into your description of 'kinds' - whatever that means? Some arbitrary classification?
@Japeth555 Oh dear. You appear to be having difficulty with the wording; 'the process of evolution means a species evolves into a different specie's' Yes, 'they all stay within the boundaries of their kinds' . It doesn't mean that a dog could evolve, in a few million years, into a cat. You utter moron! Get a bloody grip and read something intelligent for once in your life.
@Japeth555 Whether my senses are reliable or that scientific laws will always work? Completely irrelevant philosophical question that has little or nothing to do with the topic. Why digress to such a high degree?
@Japeth555 BLASPHEMY AND LIES!!! You must buy the Holy Book! Only when all unbelievers are hunted down with dogs and thrown into a giant pit of fire will you know what salvation means. We must build great temples for the priests and for the dead! Unbelievers’ abundance shall be taken from them and burned as a sacrifice. Heretics and apostates!. Does this sound familiar? This is how the ‘Empires of Faith’ became empires. The Holy Books are written by and for slavers. There is no God, get over it
i agree with you on all points, perhaps except the final line, may i ask you ... why does all the corruption tell us there is no God? could there be a God without corruption, without magic?
could our consciousness be more resound after death, like a consciousness soup? and could that conscousness be guiding evolutionary patterns, cosmological patterns? can it be evolving as a collective on another dimensional existence? perhaps a lower dimension?
@thegoochieguy "could our consciousness be more resound after death, "
There is no reason to think that it would. All evidence points to death being the end of our life experience with nothing to follow. Many religions want that not to be true but there is nothing to suggest that there is any life after death. Many people will be disappointed - well they would be if they were alive!
@thegoochieguy Well, I reckon the God squad should claim God to in fact be the 'dark matter' that scientists are aware 'exists' but they have absolutely no idea what it is. Maybe that could be a fun angle. It could explain the telepathic nature of communing with this God. In fact, despite my strategic rejection of psycho-God, it's still hard to get rid of the possibility of a God aspect beyond what we can see and touch.
@ritchloui "In fact, despite my strategic rejection of psycho-God, it's still hard to get rid of the possibility of a God aspect beyond what we can see and touch."
I agree it is very tempting to think there is 'something there' but with the absolute lack of any evidence and the knowledge we have today of life the universe and everything, I find it completely illogical to imagine any gods could possibly exist.
@ritchloui the holy book? they all claim to be holy, they all have testaments, they all have prophets, they all make profits, they all require brainwashing, finally, they're all ridiculous, old, and day by day slowly disproven. much like a detective who looks at the scene of a crime, earth being the scene.
@Sc0ttPrian I think we can safely exchange the world 'Holy' with the word 'Occult' and the meaning and effects are the same. They are all basically slavers' handbooks. It's so convenient that God/Allah loves to see his creation on their knees in abject terror, pleading for mercy and in worshipful subjection. It's so obviously pathological and it even has a name, the Stockholm Syndrome.
@scienceandmusiclover its amazing all cretionist are dumb and u guys are so smart right? so if so smart and understand how things work y dont u all create life? thats fucked up u cant coz u arent as smart as u think r u? listen if u wanna beleive that ur great grand mom was fucked by apes so be it and if u wanna beleive that ur great grand father used to fuck animals so be it if u wanna beleive that ur mom fucked a chimp to make u so be it but dont try to mess up norman ppls mind with ur shit
@mainvideos2009 Evolution IS a fact. The theory of evolution is an explanation of the mechanisms through which that evolution happens, and it has very ample support of evidence, thus it is a very strong theory. However, a) no matter how strong or weak it is, a theory is, and will always remain as, a theory; and b) a theory doesn't mean "we think this exhists", it means "this exhists, and studying this we came to the conclusion that this is HOW it exhists". And that's how you win that debate.
If you deny Evolution fine. Perhaps you should simply stop taking advantage of all of the medical sciences that owe their existence to Evolution. If you are ever faced with a life threatening illness, don't waste your time with the hospital. Just pray about it. In the long run the Gene Pool with thank you for your efforts. Will full ignorance is not an excuse. If you can't be bothered to get an education, then get the hell out of the way because there are plenty of folks who will benefit.
@Mudflappus well said! They also seem to nonchalantly hop into airplanes reading bibles and start their cars putting full trust into the mechanics of their brakes whilst listening to gospel songs coming out of their speakers that are hooked with wires to the car radio which is connected on a invisible connection through radiowaves.. wtf is wrong with these people.. seriously.. just a pathetically low IQ i suppose..
@Mudflappus Thats a fine point there. I support it. But when these people get kids and the kids die becouse of the dumb parents, that is what I am not fine about.
(Becouse kids of religious parents CAN become inteligent,racional people. It's just rare that they are able to break out.)
I know my faith in Jesus and creationism is ridiculous, so I'm gonna claim that evolutionary biology is "just another religion" so at least I'm not alone in my stupidity.
@HisTruthbeUNKOWN Since God created all of creation it wouldn't be too difficult for Him to create new species of bacteria right before our eyes. What about the new planet that has been discovered where do you suppose that came from.
" What about the new planet that has been discovered where do you suppose that came from."
That new planet, that's not in our solar system, that astronomers have discovered? It came by, in the same way Earth did: by gradual processes. Read more, Phyllis.
@arrivalblue2 evolution didn't state we evolved from monkeys...we have a COMMON ANCESTER with them. If anything, we evolved from something that resembles an ape.
@1954phyllis "This video should be cvalled why evolution is a hoax."
You're too fucking stupid to even grasp the basics. We're talking grade school science that you don't "believe" in. Superstitious tards like you are why we are failing to remain competetive in the world.
It's so tragically ironic that fuckwits like this shit spewing twat romanticize the "good ol' days." Yet during the period they're so fond of, nearly everyone realized the universe wasn't 6000 fucking years old.
@whiteyvanpeebles No I'm not superstitous I just happen to believe the Genesis account of creation. Who in their right mind would believe in that nonsense of evolution. Too bad that supposedly intelligent men would believe that bologna.
@whiteyvanpeebles FYI I studied evolution in school and I didn't believe it then and I sure dont believe it now. There is more proof of a c reator than the bologna of evolution.
@1954phyllis Um, I didn't say you didn't study it. I said you're to stupid to grasp iy. Big difference, please try to keep up. Thing is, eveolution happens whether you believe in it or not.
Newton was a Christian. Why don't you go argue with him. He's the one who figured out the speed of light. That alone, conclusively proves the universe can't be only 6000 years old.
You believe in magic, I don't. I recognize observable reality. You're a bullshit artist.
@whiteyvanpeebles What you believe is your business. I believe that God in His wisdom created all of creation and I believe the Genesis account. I don't have enough faith to believe in evolution. I believe that God's wisdom far exceeds that of man. I believe that we are here on this earth for a reason and it sure isn't that we evolved from some ape.
@whiteyvanpeebles Any one trhat believes in evolution has faith in something that never happened. So what you're saying is you believe that from out of nowhere there suddenly appeared some kind of soup and all of a sudden this fish evolved and suddenly it developed lungs and legs and lo and behold land appeared and it crawled onto land and from that one fish thousands of species appeared. I have a question for you did all the mountains, rivers, streams come from that same soup?
@1954phyllis Thanks for perfectly demonstrating what I'm talking about. Evolutionary theory says nothing you've just claimed. You're either a liar, stupid, or both. There's no other option. Evolution happens whether you, I, or anyone else believes it, or not.
Also, I shouldn't have to explain to you where rivers, mountains, ect, come from, because it's also well known and documented. You're shamefully uneducated. Your parents should be ashamed.
@RezCypher There is no way that evolution is true and it is hilarious that so called intelligent men would believe that we evolved from something that resembles an ape.
@1954phyllis Is that an attempt to convert me or something? I have strong beliefs (like you obviously) and it will take A LOT MORE than that to intimidate me.This is my last word on the subject
"that we evolved from something that resembles an ape."
Your parent resembles apes, and with just about any taxonomic definition, they ARE apes. So what you find hilarious is simple based on your own ignorance.
@Aaberg123 Since my parents aren't apes they don't resemble them or should I say didn't since my parents have been dead a long time. Further more any one with an ounce of common sense would know that humans certainly didn't evolve from another animal. You are so stupid its pathetic.
Just about all the dogs we see today came from a wolf-like ancestor. Just as dogs, we humans diverged from the other great apes many thousands years ago, slowly shedding most of our hair and gaining a larger brain; since apparently, this was advantageous to us, in the environment we were in. Just like you look like a mix of your parents + extra, so has generation after generation formed the species that exist today.
@Aaberg123 Do you really think that I believe that garbage that man evolved from great apes many thousands of years ago? We all came from two ancestors who were Adam and Eve. Evolution is such garbage. You really believe fairy tales don't you?
@1954phyllis Er...... did you actually watch the video?? What part of Dr Coyne's very easy to understand lecture do you have problems with? If you have been presented with all this evidence and you still believe in the genesis account, then you are in Dr Coyne's words 'Perverse' (and I dont mean that in any sexual way you must understand). If Special Creation is true, then what is YOUR explanation of the obeserved phenomena, as explained by the video (ie vestigial genes/organs et al)? Goddunnit?
@1954phyllis Please explain THIS, if Adam and Eve and Cain & Abel (murderered) were the only 4 people on earth, where did Cain's wife come from???? Did Cain get with his mother?? When he was expelled to the land of Nod and built a city, who populated the city?? How did he build a whole city on his own? And Why if there were no people to populate it?? Whatever mumbo-jumbo you make up, can you provide evidence? How does the genesis (ahem...) "explanation" help us combat disease etc?
Happy Darwin Day to all out there in U-tube land!
mtbee9 1 month ago
How can anyone believe in this bullcrap? If evolution was true then then the damn monkeys would still be turning into nude humans in every zoo around the world.
slyjose101 1 month ago
@slyjose101 "monkeys would still be turning into nude humans"
Your ignorance is astounding! Thanks for sharing it.
mtbee9 1 month ago
@slyjose101 I sincerely hope your not serious.
SuperBspb 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Someone please give me proof.......create life from non-life, not in a cartoon video, not on a chart but a living organism from where there was none. You can explain how you THINK it happened so do it!
dreigel411Vin 2 months ago
You can skip the first 15 minutes if you only want the core of the lecture.
siddkulk 2 months ago
You don't understand! Evolution can't be true for two reasons. 1) I don't understand it (so therefore it can't be true) and 2) I really really believe it was something else. And as we all know, reality is directly affected by the majorities belief system. And by Majority I mean mine. Hence, God did it.
tfavors28 3 months ago
@tfavors28 "And by Majority I mean mine. Hence, God did it" The scary thing is there are millions who believe in statements not too unlike yours.
mtbee9 2 months ago
@mtbee9 I was putting myself in the shoes of Kent Hovind and ShockofGod when I wrote that statement. Hovind, in his video "100 reasons why evolution is stupid" several times refers to #1. "I just don't see how that can happen, seems stupid" And Shock is infamous of talking about how christianity is real, but if you ask him about other religions he laughs at how fake they are
tfavors28 2 months ago
Also, what explanation would "Dr." Coyne give for the development of the external, nevermind the internal, reproductive organs?
Tsadi9Mem9Khet9 3 months ago
This is a lie!According to Islam all things created as it is..There is no such thing as Evolution.Evolution is a bullshit theory created by bullshit people.You can find this mind twisted people among the western educated people.This kind of believe system is changing rapidly..many have come to the truth by accepting Islam.yes Islam is the only truth.That is why Islam is the fastest growing religion In North America and Europe.Another name for evolution is Infidel "bull shit theory".Salam!
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6 "This is a lie!According to Islam all things created as it is" Well science has proved that wrong - sorry Evolution is considered fact by those who actually understand it. If it disagrees with your religion then your religion is wrong. Don't worry - there plenty of others to choose from!
"many have come to the truth by accepting Islam." Yep and many have realized there is no evidence to support its claims and seen religion for what it is! Ancient mythology. Salami to you too!
mtbee9 3 months ago
As far as the lanugo is concerned, the conjecture that it may be the body's response to the fetus' lack of insulating fat seems as though it may be backed up by the fact that sufferers of anorexia nervosa also develop a light coat of hair over their bodies and faces.
Tsadi9Mem9Khet9 3 months ago
As for the whale "hind limbs", they, along with the "pelvis", which are not the same from one gender to the other, apparently serve a reproductive function.
Tsadi9Mem9Khet9 3 months ago
As far as the dolphin embryo is concerned (beginning around the 37 minute mark), it is idiotically presumptuous and untrue to state that "the only possible explanation" is evolution, and that the ONLY alternative is to state that it was a matter of arbitrary choice by the Creator. Is there no stupidity cut off point for professors??!!
Tsadi9Mem9Khet9 3 months ago
"A record so patchy, that we know only anywhere between one one-hundredth of one percent to one percent of the species that ever lived." So our maximum knowledge of the history of life is only one percent." (Raises hand) Professor Coyne, if we only know of a maximum of one percent of the history of life, then how do we know that it is one f**king percent?
Tsadi9Mem9Khet9 3 months ago
There could not have been an episode of South Park based around this guy's (Jerry Coyne's) smugness, because it would simply have evaporated all life in the universe. Not only is he smug, but completely ignorant. How exactly does a materialist go about describing anything, especially the fact that what he considers a low percentage of people in the U.S. believe in evolution, as reprehensible, bad, etc.? A materialist cannot state such things without violating his own supposed position.
Tsadi9Mem9Khet9 3 months ago
Evolution is religion - not science
jamiesbond007 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jamiesbond007 "Evolution is religion - not science"
Well obviously you're wrong as Evolution is clearly Science and not a religion, but just for kicks please explain where do atheists go to worship 'no god' and what form does this so called religion take.
Your explanation should bear in mind the definition of Religion: "the service and worship of God or the supernatural". Merriam webster.
mtbee9 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jamiesbond007 you are using a secondary definition of the word 'religion', not its primary definition. The primary definition of religion requires the concept of deity in a body of worship in order for that to be classified as religion. Does evolution have any concept of deity? No. Therefore, according to the PRIMARY definition of religion, evolution is not a religion. Please stick to this definition, and stop exploiting the ambiguity in English language.
Casshyr 3 months ago
@jamiesbond007 I love how the best remaining defense of the religious is to say "your belief is so bad, it's just like religion!".
dlbattle100 3 months ago
@dlbattle100 I love how the best remaining answer to that "defence" is "It's not" with no real evidence.
jamiesbond007 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jerry the fairy is living a fairytale. He talks about "cowardly and intellectually dishonest actions" but forgets to remind us that no university quotes him and no university considers him reasonable.
However all higher-learning institutions respect Albert Einstein who wrote
"A legitimate conflict between science and religion cannot exist. Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." - Albert Einstein
]
Theologyontap 4 months ago
2:15
A horse. Forced Laughs. Lulz
eyebal 4 months ago
when science explain something is due to explain to the last doubt, but when is about a holy book is just my holy book say it an that is it, when religion is ask for evidence the only source is the holy book and that is enough, NO is not get over there is no god, evidence is required, we don't believe in evolution, we accept it based in evidence is real and is a fact.
legolasgreenleaff 6 months ago
And futhermore, how do you know evolution isn't of god?
You are selfish.
Planetarify 6 months ago
thank you for this great insight, i have a blossoming interest in the sciences and biology in particular
thegoochieguy 6 months ago
Ever since the world was created, energy has been in a constant state of decay. The THEORY of evolution is saying that energy is becoming more complex to form cells and such. Ridiculous.. only fools turn to thing such as evolution. God made the world.
Planetarify 6 months ago
@Planetarify Unfortunately you, like someone who can't spell or smells bad, are unaware of what is wrong but that is obvious to others. Your pathetic pseudo-scientific comment about energy is just so half-baked I won't bother with it. You are ignorant of the use of the term 'theory' in science. Perhaps you should inform yourself. What possible explanatory power is derived from saying God made the world? What medicine or technology can be derived from 'God did it'. God of the morons did it.
ritchloui 6 months ago
@ritchloui can you prove evolution?
Planetarify 6 months ago
@Planetarify It's been proved you moron.
ritchloui 6 months ago
@ritchloui give me some hard proof.
Planetarify 6 months ago
@Planetarify You want me to give you hard proof? What's in it for me? The silly mind games that occultists and frauds usually play are not of any interest to me excepting to witness the strange twists and turns of a mind in manacles. The 'holy' texts are manuals for ruthless and deceitful men. They learn about textual deconstruction and how to use the texts to hold on to their 'flock'. Islam is quite clear about this, it aims for you to submit and become a willing slave not just a sheep.
ritchloui 6 months ago
@Planetarify Evolution has been proven and witnessed in microscopic animals... For an example.. The one celled Euglena evolved antennas to light their path in the dark depths of the seas. If you say that evolution is just a theory... SO IS GRAVITY!! You might now say.. No gravity is a scientific fact... Yes.. But everything starts with theorys to see and try to understand how everything works... For an example.. People once thought that the earth was flat.. We now know its round. thx to science.
MarcusEFN 6 months ago
@MarcusEFN you should feel bad becouse your Imaginary gone whith the wind. A famous British paleontologist, Derek V. Ager, admits
this fact, even though he is an evolutionist:
The point emerges that if we examine the fossil record in detail,
whether at the level of orders or of species, we find—over and
over again—not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion of
one group
There is no Evolution, ((but)) that does not means that the Bible is true
Findsomthingright 5 months ago
@Findsomthingright "if we examine the fossil record in detail, whether at the level of orders or of species, we find ... not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion of one group.
You've obviously been reading the wrong books.That is not written in any science book I've ever read!
Perhaps it was from a lying creationist website. They have to lie as they cannot accept the truth.
mtbee9 4 months ago
@mtbee9 Evolutionist scientist, Derek A.Ager, in the book, Nature of the fossil record: ((The point emerges that if we examine the fossil record in detail,
whether at the level of orders or of species, we find—over and
over again—not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion of ((one group
I don't know, did you ever heard about the term ((Cambrian Age)) ?? did you
Findsomthingright 4 months ago
@Findsomthingright "over and over again—not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion "
Evidence points to both periods of slower and more rapid evolution (such as the end of the Cambrian period). The Dinosaur extinction is a period when a castastrophy wiped out many species leaving environments for the survivors (mammals) to evolve into. This has happened many times.
In between these 'rapid' events are periods of slower evolution. 'Rapid' in this context is 30 MY or so.
mtbee9 4 months ago
@mtbee9Which evidences are you talking about, it's in your mind only i think, evolutionists have been making strenuous efforts to find fossils since the middle of the
the nineteen century all over the world, no transitional forms
have yet been uncovered. All the fossils unearthed in excavations
showed that, contrary to the expectations of
evolutionists, life appeared on earth all of a sudden and
fully-formed, therefore, no evolution
Findsomthingright 4 months ago
@Findsomthingright Paleontologists "have been making strenuous efforts to find fossils". Yes they have and they have thousands of specimens. Many transitional forms of whales, horses, dinosaurs, birds, fish, humans etc. have been found. Archeopteryx, Tiktaalik being notable specimens. You definitely have not been reading the right books. "fully-formed," Of course they're fully formed. They were all distinct animals!
You do not understand Evolution. I suggest you study what you argue against!
mtbee9 4 months ago
@Findsomthingright cont. "therefore, no evolution" Why do you argue against something that you do not understand. It behoves you to learn about and save you from coming out with statements that are totally wrong! Sounds like you been reading Creationists sites that lie about it as they know if they told you the facts that you would probably accept it, so they misrepresent Evolution because they cannot stand the fact they are losing the argument!
So explain what you think a transitional form is?
mtbee9 4 months ago
@mtbee9 what i think a transitional form is? For instance, some half-fish/half-reptiles should have lived in the past which had acquired some reptilian traits in addition to the fish traits they already had. Or there should have existed some reptile-birds, which acquiredsome bird traits in addition to the reptilian traits they already had. ....... Evolutionists refer to these imaginary creatures, which they believe to have lived in the past, as “transitional forms.”
Findsomthingright 4 months ago
@Findsomthingright "some reptilian traits in addition to the fish traits" Precisely what Tiktaalik is, an animal with traits of fish and amphibians.
"reptile-birds, which acquiredsome bird traits in addition to the reptilian traits" Well Dino-birds actually. But that is what we see with Archeopteryx bird like wings and feathers, yet Dinosaur type teeth.
Sorry but transitional forms do exist. You choose not to acknowledge them.
Thanks for playing.
mtbee9 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mtbee9 "some reptilian traits in addition to the fish traits" Precisely what Tiktaalik is?? What are you talking about ?? There a 120-million-year-old fossil tortoise in is proof that reptiles are not descended from other living things, never underwent any intermediate stages, and have maintained exactly the same structure for millions of years, nice playing whith you
Findsomthingright 4 months ago
@Findsomthingright newly discovered dinosaurs with feathers also show the transition from reptiles to primitive birds. People in the past suspected this all along, but no one had ever discovered dinosaurs with feathers, but now we do. New evidence just keeps coming in, and they all support evolution. You seen the movie Jurassic Park? Remember the raptors? Today's palaeontologists will actually tell you the design of those raptors is wrong in the film, they should have feathers covering them.
Casshyr 4 months ago
@Casshyr There a 37 to 23-million-year-old fossil of a turtle, there is no defrence between it and what we have today, what are you talking about,darwinists should be able to explain the development of a turtle's shell, they should be able to show how the structure developed by chance through an imaginary process of evolution and produce proof of it. But to explain the development of living creatures, darwinists only resort to stories
Findsomthingright 4 months ago
@Findsomthingright "But to explain the development of living creatures, darwinists only resort to stories" => no, not stories. How evolution studies work is we look at what we can see today, and we form theories on what happened in the past. Are they 100% correct? Probably not. But they are our best guesses nevertheless, without resorting to supernatural talks. If you disagree with their theories, you need to provide evidence why u disagree. Simply saying "it's just a guess" is not good enough.
Casshyr 4 months ago
@Findsomthingright There are indeed reports on how a turtle shell develop. Go to google scholar and type "turtle shell evolution". Are they facts? No. But are they stories? No. They are theories backed up by scientific evidence. To debunk those evidence, you need to first read those articles, and point out what's wrong with the evidence presented. Again, it is important for you to realize simply saying "that's not proof, that's just a guess" is not a scientific criticism.
Casshyr 4 months ago
@Casshyr that is the beauty of science is not a dogma, new information and evidence come out old or false is discarted and have to be tested against evidence, if is no evidence such and such theory is rejected or in the case of the age of earth, older the sample we have older the earth, the evidence is there, but you need to train your eyes and mid to ask the right questions, and to observe the evidence like detective
legolasgreenleaff 4 months ago
@legolasgreenleaff " new information and evidence come out old or false is discarted and have to be tested against evidence" => totally agree, but creationists have not presented any evidence to discard evolution. Their classical arguments "lack of transitional fossils", "irreducible complexity", "no beneficial mutations" have all been debunked. And they also don't seem to understand you can't use God in your reasoning unless you can first prove God's existence scientifically.
Casshyr 4 months ago
@Casshyr maybe iwas not clear, i accept evolution, i already read: why evolution is true, the greatest show in earth and what are the fossils and what they say, and i knew a lot of the evidence but isolated when you put together you agree with the evidence and accept the scientific theory of evolution as a fact, in the words of russel wallace evolution left no room for god, and for god is no evidence besides a mountain of emotional garbage, thanks enjoy the only life you will ever have
legolasgreenleaff 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@legolasgreenleaff being a theistic evolutionist, i don't think evolution left no room for God, and neither do i treat evolution as a scientific fact. It's simply the best explanation we have so far, considering the alternatives. I personally think people who think evolution disproves any concept of God is being a bigot. Evolution only disproves creationism, or more specifically, the creationism as described in Quran + Bible.
Casshyr 4 months ago
@؟؟mtbee9 what i think a transitional form is? ,for instance, some half-fish/half-reptiles should have lived in the past which had acquired some reptilian traits in addition to the fish traits they already had. Or there should have existed some reptile-birds, which acquiredsome bird traits in addition to the reptilian traits they already had. Evolutionists refer to these imaginary creatures, which they believe to have lived in the past, as “transitional forms.”
Findsomthingright 4 months ago
@MarcusEFN you are foolish my friend maybe one day you will see.
Planetarify 4 months ago
@Planetarify Says the deluded fool who blindly swallows whatever his preacher tells him/her.. You'll be disappointed with your wishful thinking
MarcusEFN 4 months ago
@MarcusEFN yet what is the difference in the end-at least I know I belive in something that exists which is my creator. However, think what you want, ill pray for you friend.
Planetarify 4 months ago
@Planetarify Your creator are your parents, Thanks for your prayers. I'll have one of my pagan friends sacrifice a goat in your honor.
MarcusEFN 4 months ago
Second law of thermodynamics states that energy is always degrading.
Planetarify 6 months ago
Here's the truth... if human kind came from monkeys, then WHERE DID MONKEYS COME FROM???
0wolfplayer0 7 months ago
@0wolfplayer0 "if human kind came from monkeys"
Oh dear yet another ignorant creationist who doesn't understand Evolution.
Look - read about it first.... Understand it (it's actually not difficult)... then come back and ask a sensible question about Evolution.
mtbee9 7 months ago
Comment removed
ErnilEnNaur 7 months ago
Jerry Coyne is related to a monkey?...I am doubtful, but if thats where all his dedicated work has led him...each to their own (or maybe not?).
TREACLE97 8 months ago
Religion is a destructive force..
humayun360 8 months ago in playlist RDF TV
@humayun360 Religion is not a destructive force, it is one of many tools in the hands of destructive people. And probably the most dangerous one.
ErnilEnNaur 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
17 Americans didn't like this video - and probably only listened to the first 5 minutes ;-)
bersa888 9 months ago
Comment removed
bersa888 9 months ago
i dont like he was pushing the idea of abiogenisis, i cant find any convincing research that can reproduce it. i find panspermia more likely for our case, extremophiles were some of the first micro organisms.
803brando 10 months ago
@803brando But where did the extremophiles come from?
Oddessuss 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
w.youtube.com/watch?v=ksbnVMtXOQU&feature=related
Gubbible 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
youtube.com/watch?v=ksbnVMtXOQU&feature=related
Gubbible 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
youtube.com/watch?v=ksbnVMtXOQU&feature=related
Gubbible 11 months ago
Comment removed
Gubbible 11 months ago
they found human remains of a 10ft man in mexico said to be millions of years ago, so how come they were taller then apposed to now... when evolution says we came from a worm, then a worm with legs, then a worm with legs and arms, then a monkey and then humans... the evolution of humans are getting bigger? so why was there a 10ft man millions of years ago. goes against human evolution?
Gubbible 11 months ago
@Gubbible here check the link,
youtube.com/watch?v=ksbnVMtXOQU&feature=related
Gubbible 11 months ago
Comment removed
maxpainfu1 10 months ago
@Gubbible you are gullible gubbible
Oddessuss 10 months ago
@Oddessuss am i wrong ?
Gubbible 10 months ago
@Gubbible Yes you are, they never found a 10 m tall man, its a fraud. Check your sources carefully
Oddessuss 10 months ago
@Oddessuss pffft show me where its wrong
Gubbible 10 months ago
@Gubbible How about you start by showing me the scientific journal article of the 10 m man found in mexico ... what no reliable sources for it...haha PWNED
Oddessuss 10 months ago
@Oddessuss i linked it on youtube.. you dumb lol.. how bowt thats a something compared to your nothing proof.
Gubbible 10 months ago
@Gubbible Youtube ISN"T A VALID SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL ARTICLE ... and why does it have to recognised by science you say, because the scientific method is the best method we have at determining causes of natural phenomena, otherwise your you tube link aint worth shit. Yep I'm dumb for being smarter than you, sorry how does that make sense? fucking clusterfuck of stupid
Oddessuss 10 months ago
@Oddessuss show me your proof. stop fucking around and get to the point im asking of you. prove your worth.
Gubbible 10 months ago
@Gubbible Hang on, i mean your the fucking dickhead making the fucking claim that theres a 10 m skeleton in mexico. How about you back it up. You are demanding I what, prove you wrong. Burden of proof is on the person making the claim dickhead, youtube vids simply don't cut it fucktard. Go fuck a sheep or something fucking inbred hick.
Oddessuss 10 months ago
@Oddessuss well your the one saying its wrong... wheres your proof of that... idiot..
Gubbible 10 months ago
@Gubbible No fucktard the burden of proof is yours. There are fairies in my backyard, what don't believeme, PROVE ME WRONG. Haha fucking stupid cunt doesn't know what a fallacy is. Stupid cunt.
Oddessuss 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Oddessuss your saying its lies, why should i believe your word? over that video?.... oh thats right? because you said so? YOU SAID SO? no one else... JUST YOU! stupid ass.. i believe that video is true... so prove to me that its false. and ill believe you? OH YOU CANT, thats right... your dumb!! you can't prove its false.. stupid ass! my proof is that video.. now come up with a good argument to disprove the video dickhead!!!
Gubbible 10 months ago
@Oddessuss check this one out too a whole of evidence of tall giants.. ..!.. "_" ..!..
youtube.com/watch?v=qCh0ddAX1T4&feature=related
youtube.com/watch?v=qCh0ddAX1T4&feature=related
youtube.com/watch?v=qCh0ddAX1T4&feature=related
Watch it I dare you dumb asss!!!
Gubbible 10 months ago
@Gubbible Wow some youtube videos, yep that proves it (not) did you CHECK THE SOURCES TO SEE IF ITS RELIABLE. I think you are a troll Gubbible.
Oddessuss 10 months ago
@Oddessuss hahahaha look at you, since your against what i believe in, tell me what you believe in?, cause your not answering any of my questions, and yes i did check up on his sources. 1 step ahead of you mate, i mean idiot that opens his mouth but cant prove anything he says
Gubbible 10 months ago
@Gubbible I believe, that your lack of empirical evidence for your claim makes you a tool. That is my belief system ;)
Oddessuss 10 months ago 14
@Gubbible your saying its lies, why should i believe your word? over that video?.... oh thats right? because you said so? YOU SAID SO? no one else... JUST YOU! stupid ass.. i believe that video is true... so prove to me that its false. and ill believe you? OH YOU CANT, thats right... your dumb!! you can't prove its false.. stupid ass! my proof is that video.. now come up with a good argument to disprove the video dickhead!!!
Gubbible 10 months ago
is he serious ? I think I just found evolutions kent hovind ....
soldierofGod40 11 months ago
Also I'm not sure why you would think it would be relevant to declare that some atheists don' t accept the theory. That would perfectly fit the definition of a non sequitur and makes me suspicious of your knowledge of the topic. Read Mudflappus's comment. Then read it again. If it isn't apparent to you why evolution is as accepted as it is then you need you go home wrap your head in aluminum foil then gently place it in the oven.
derangius 11 months ago
@bbree333 stupid doesnt class as establish. if u beleive that an ape used to fuck ur grand mother so be it but dont expect us to beleive so, i once up on a time ur grand mother used to be an ameba thats up to u fine by me. tell me how does a mechonism that produces les and less creates more and more? coz in evolution the stronger live the weaker dies so how r there so many species from since life was formed? wouldnt the stronger out lived the weaker? then how so many species if so?
beedip84 1 year ago
Can someone shove a cock in these christians mouths already? Evolution is as accepted as the periodic table due to its power to predict. The real question is is that does being a buffoon fundamentalist make survival easier? Scary if it were.
derangius 1 year ago
@derangius y would u want to do that? does that mean u r gay?
beedip84 1 year ago
@beedip84 Judging from your spelling and looking at the rest of your well thought out, asserted and grammatically correct comments it has become apparent that a conversation with my red brick wall would not only be more productive than one with you but also more interesting. For fear of devolution by association with profound idiocy I will go ahead and refuse to engage you further in conversation.
derangius 1 year ago
@derangius
This is an emotional respones and makes the false claim about evolution being as accepted as the period table. In reality, there are many scientists, even atheists who admit is isfaulty but simply "the best we have". Please, if you have any rational reasons for believing in evolution, reply to this. otherwise, let's not be arbitrary and emotional.
Japeth555 1 year ago
@Japeth555 Right you are about the emotional response. Sometimes this happens. But in the very message that you send you imply that I don't have a rational reason to accept the theory but I believe I clearly stated in my comment that it is accepted due to its PREDICTIVE POWER. If that is not a rational reason to you than you are patently have no reasoning ability and are guilty of the very same accusation that you make. continued....
derangius 11 months ago
@derangius What "predictive power"? the theory of evolution has never contributed to any new technologies or advances in the medical field. It really is not neccessary to believe in order to do good science. I understand that whetehr someone believes something or not doesnt make it valid or invalid, i was simply arguing along your lines. but I must ask, why do you believ irt is we can reason at all? How do you know your senses and memory are reliable or that scientific laws will always work?
Japeth555 11 months ago
@Japeth555 One example of predictive power would be that information in genes is transmitted molecularly in a very precise way but not quite perfectly which allows for slight variations. Because of this Idea biologists have discovered DNA with its mutation rate of 10-9 per nucleotide per cell division. Instead of relying on a random internet guy for information on the subject why not look it up. There are many fine examples of the theory's power to predict.
derangius 11 months ago
@derangius Here you misunderstand what i believe. I am un full accordancw with what you just posted about variation and information exchange. This isnt the evolution Im talking about. Of cource new species come about, but they all stay within the boundaries of their "kinds" (mamoths and elephnats related, camels and llamas, etc.) And why should that be an irrelevant question?
Japeth555 11 months ago
@Japeth555 There is no misunderstanding on what you believe. I did not make an attempt to pretend to know what you think. I was simply trying to assert the predictive power of the evolutionary theory. I don't know how it could be communicated in an easier way. Maybe it's my fault for not knowing how to explain.
derangius 11 months ago
@derangius
Creationists agree with evolutionists about natural selection, speciation, and the changes we see in labs and in nature currently.
Japeth555 11 months ago
@Japeth555 "new species come about, but they all stay within the boundaries of their "kinds"'
So what was Archeopteryx? A bird with teeth and other dinosaur features or a dinosaur with feathers and other bird like features.
After you answer that we can move on to all of the other species that have existed that don't fall into your description of 'kinds' - whatever that means? Some arbitrary classification?
mtbee9 11 months ago
@Japeth555 Oh dear. You appear to be having difficulty with the wording; 'the process of evolution means a species evolves into a different specie's' Yes, 'they all stay within the boundaries of their kinds' . It doesn't mean that a dog could evolve, in a few million years, into a cat. You utter moron! Get a bloody grip and read something intelligent for once in your life.
ritchloui 9 months ago
@Japeth555 Whether my senses are reliable or that scientific laws will always work? Completely irrelevant philosophical question that has little or nothing to do with the topic. Why digress to such a high degree?
derangius 11 months ago
@Japeth555 BLASPHEMY AND LIES!!! You must buy the Holy Book! Only when all unbelievers are hunted down with dogs and thrown into a giant pit of fire will you know what salvation means. We must build great temples for the priests and for the dead! Unbelievers’ abundance shall be taken from them and burned as a sacrifice. Heretics and apostates!. Does this sound familiar? This is how the ‘Empires of Faith’ became empires. The Holy Books are written by and for slavers. There is no God, get over it
ritchloui 9 months ago 19
@ritchloui
i agree with you on all points, perhaps except the final line, may i ask you ... why does all the corruption tell us there is no God? could there be a God without corruption, without magic?
could our consciousness be more resound after death, like a consciousness soup? and could that conscousness be guiding evolutionary patterns, cosmological patterns? can it be evolving as a collective on another dimensional existence? perhaps a lower dimension?
i would enjoy dialogue
thegoochieguy 6 months ago
@thegoochieguy "could our consciousness be more resound after death, "
There is no reason to think that it would. All evidence points to death being the end of our life experience with nothing to follow. Many religions want that not to be true but there is nothing to suggest that there is any life after death. Many people will be disappointed - well they would be if they were alive!
mtbee9 6 months ago
@thegoochieguy Well, I reckon the God squad should claim God to in fact be the 'dark matter' that scientists are aware 'exists' but they have absolutely no idea what it is. Maybe that could be a fun angle. It could explain the telepathic nature of communing with this God. In fact, despite my strategic rejection of psycho-God, it's still hard to get rid of the possibility of a God aspect beyond what we can see and touch.
ritchloui 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ritchloui "In fact, despite my strategic rejection of psycho-God, it's still hard to get rid of the possibility of a God aspect beyond what we can see and touch."
I agree it is very tempting to think there is 'something there' but with the absolute lack of any evidence and the knowledge we have today of life the universe and everything, I find it completely illogical to imagine any gods could possibly exist.
mtbee9 6 months ago
@ritchloui the holy book? they all claim to be holy, they all have testaments, they all have prophets, they all make profits, they all require brainwashing, finally, they're all ridiculous, old, and day by day slowly disproven. much like a detective who looks at the scene of a crime, earth being the scene.
Sc0ttPrian 6 months ago
@Sc0ttPrian I think we can safely exchange the world 'Holy' with the word 'Occult' and the meaning and effects are the same. They are all basically slavers' handbooks. It's so convenient that God/Allah loves to see his creation on their knees in abject terror, pleading for mercy and in worshipful subjection. It's so obviously pathological and it even has a name, the Stockholm Syndrome.
ritchloui 6 months ago
In The Name of God Allah(God) The Most Gracious The Most Merciful
76:(1) Has there not been over Man a long period of Time, when he was nothing - (not even) mentioned?
(2) Verily We created Man from a drop of mingled sperm, in order to try him: So We gave him (the gifts), of Hearing and Sight.
(3) We showed him the Way: whether he be grateful or ungrateful (rests on his will)."
77705000000000000000 1 year ago
@bbree333 So tell me since you're som smart, how does the world really work. I'm not talking about that fairy tale of evolution either.
1954phyllis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
people follow jesus christ because he is the way, simple. you don't have to waste your time with useless knowledge.
bass109 1 year ago
mankind came from breath of jesus christ. evolution is satanic laws for murderers
bass109 1 year ago
@bass109 You said, ["mankind came from breath of jesus christ. evolution is satanic laws for murderers"]
I wondered how anyone could be that uneducated until I saw your channel and there it is.
Your response to books, "none, don't read anything."
You are exactly what a creationist is expected to be.
scienceandmusiclover 1 year ago
@scienceandmusiclover I told the 100% truth but you can follow your own way.
bass109 1 year ago
@bass109 Stay off of my channel.
scienceandmusiclover 1 year ago
@scienceandmusiclover its amazing all cretionist are dumb and u guys are so smart right? so if so smart and understand how things work y dont u all create life? thats fucked up u cant coz u arent as smart as u think r u? listen if u wanna beleive that ur great grand mom was fucked by apes so be it and if u wanna beleive that ur great grand father used to fuck animals so be it if u wanna beleive that ur mom fucked a chimp to make u so be it but dont try to mess up norman ppls mind with ur shit
beedip84 1 year ago
@beedip84 Your sure can say "fuck" a lot so you must be real real smart.
scienceandmusiclover 1 year ago
@beedip84 You sir, are the missing link
ThatKidWithTheVideos 1 year ago
This guy sounds like the biggest nerd ever.
hc1153 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
totally false and unintelligent check out phantasmagoricaluser.blogspot.com
snowleopard2539 1 year ago
@bbree333 You are crazy.
1954phyllis 1 year ago
@bbree333 You are the one that is a idiot. You se in the Bible it says that anyone that doesn't believe in God is a fool.
1954phyllis 1 year ago
Can we change the name of evolution to fact of evolution instead of theory please I always get owned by this well debating
mainvideos2009 1 year ago
@mainvideos2009 Evolution IS a fact. The theory of evolution is an explanation of the mechanisms through which that evolution happens, and it has very ample support of evidence, thus it is a very strong theory. However, a) no matter how strong or weak it is, a theory is, and will always remain as, a theory; and b) a theory doesn't mean "we think this exhists", it means "this exhists, and studying this we came to the conclusion that this is HOW it exhists". And that's how you win that debate.
IommyGray 1 year ago
More people need to watch this.
kryp10yt 1 year ago
If you deny Evolution fine. Perhaps you should simply stop taking advantage of all of the medical sciences that owe their existence to Evolution. If you are ever faced with a life threatening illness, don't waste your time with the hospital. Just pray about it. In the long run the Gene Pool with thank you for your efforts. Will full ignorance is not an excuse. If you can't be bothered to get an education, then get the hell out of the way because there are plenty of folks who will benefit.
Mudflappus 1 year ago 37
@Mudflappus well said! They also seem to nonchalantly hop into airplanes reading bibles and start their cars putting full trust into the mechanics of their brakes whilst listening to gospel songs coming out of their speakers that are hooked with wires to the car radio which is connected on a invisible connection through radiowaves.. wtf is wrong with these people.. seriously.. just a pathetically low IQ i suppose..
gr4ndhustle 1 year ago
@Mudflappus
Please explain how the belief in molecules-to-man evolution has contributed to the medical field or technology.
Japeth555 1 year ago
@Mudflappus Thats a fine point there. I support it. But when these people get kids and the kids die becouse of the dumb parents, that is what I am not fine about.
(Becouse kids of religious parents CAN become inteligent,racional people. It's just rare that they are able to break out.)
rehl25 11 months ago
I know my faith in Jesus and creationism is ridiculous, so I'm gonna claim that evolutionary biology is "just another religion" so at least I'm not alone in my stupidity.
kaifroland 1 year ago
@HisTruthbeUNKOWN Since God created all of creation it wouldn't be too difficult for Him to create new species of bacteria right before our eyes. What about the new planet that has been discovered where do you suppose that came from.
1954phyllis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1954phyllis
" What about the new planet that has been discovered where do you suppose that came from."
That new planet, that's not in our solar system, that astronomers have discovered? It came by, in the same way Earth did: by gradual processes. Read more, Phyllis.
Aaberg123 1 year ago
I have to sit and laugh at everybody thinking they evolved from monkeys.. the only proof I've seen is the people as dumb as monkeys that believe it!
arrivalblue2 1 year ago
@arrivalblue2 And a man living in the sky makes more sense, right?
lH0VA 1 year ago
@lH0VA
Nope, but fact of the matter is that both require a lot of faith.
GoldenZealot21 1 year ago
@arrivalblue2 evolution didn't state we evolved from monkeys...we have a COMMON ANCESTER with them. If anything, we evolved from something that resembles an ape.
RezCypher 1 year ago
This video should be cvalled why evolution is a hoax.
1954phyllis 1 year ago
@1954phyllis "This video should be cvalled why evolution is a hoax."
You're too fucking stupid to even grasp the basics. We're talking grade school science that you don't "believe" in. Superstitious tards like you are why we are failing to remain competetive in the world.
It's so tragically ironic that fuckwits like this shit spewing twat romanticize the "good ol' days." Yet during the period they're so fond of, nearly everyone realized the universe wasn't 6000 fucking years old.
whiteyvanpeebles 1 year ago
@whiteyvanpeebles No I'm not superstitous I just happen to believe the Genesis account of creation. Who in their right mind would believe in that nonsense of evolution. Too bad that supposedly intelligent men would believe that bologna.
1954phyllis 1 year ago
@1954phyllis "Who in their right mind would believe in that nonsense of evolution."
You don't pay much attention, huh? Reading is hard.
The answer, once again for the criminally stupid is: Anyone capable of understanding basic, grade school science...that's who.
whiteyvanpeebles 1 year ago
@whiteyvanpeebles FYI I studied evolution in school and I didn't believe it then and I sure dont believe it now. There is more proof of a c reator than the bologna of evolution.
1954phyllis 1 year ago
@1954phyllis Um, I didn't say you didn't study it. I said you're to stupid to grasp iy. Big difference, please try to keep up. Thing is, eveolution happens whether you believe in it or not.
Newton was a Christian. Why don't you go argue with him. He's the one who figured out the speed of light. That alone, conclusively proves the universe can't be only 6000 years old.
You believe in magic, I don't. I recognize observable reality. You're a bullshit artist.
whiteyvanpeebles 1 year ago
@whiteyvanpeebles What you believe is your business. I believe that God in His wisdom created all of creation and I believe the Genesis account. I don't have enough faith to believe in evolution. I believe that God's wisdom far exceeds that of man. I believe that we are here on this earth for a reason and it sure isn't that we evolved from some ape.
1954phyllis 1 year ago
@1954phyllis Nothing you say is accirate, which is true of all creotard cultist. Evolution and faith have nothing to do with each other.
whiteyvanpeebles 1 year ago
@whiteyvanpeebles Any one trhat believes in evolution has faith in something that never happened. So what you're saying is you believe that from out of nowhere there suddenly appeared some kind of soup and all of a sudden this fish evolved and suddenly it developed lungs and legs and lo and behold land appeared and it crawled onto land and from that one fish thousands of species appeared. I have a question for you did all the mountains, rivers, streams come from that same soup?
1954phyllis 1 year ago
@1954phyllis Thanks for perfectly demonstrating what I'm talking about. Evolutionary theory says nothing you've just claimed. You're either a liar, stupid, or both. There's no other option. Evolution happens whether you, I, or anyone else believes it, or not.
Also, I shouldn't have to explain to you where rivers, mountains, ect, come from, because it's also well known and documented. You're shamefully uneducated. Your parents should be ashamed.
whiteyvanpeebles 1 year ago
@1954phyllis Things don't evolve in the time it takes for you to watch them...
RezCypher 1 year ago
@RezCypher There is no way that evolution is true and it is hilarious that so called intelligent men would believe that we evolved from something that resembles an ape.
1954phyllis 1 year ago
@1954phyllis Is that an attempt to convert me or something? I have strong beliefs (like you obviously) and it will take A LOT MORE than that to intimidate me.This is my last word on the subject
RezCypher 1 year ago
@1954phyllis
"that we evolved from something that resembles an ape."
Your parent resembles apes, and with just about any taxonomic definition, they ARE apes. So what you find hilarious is simple based on your own ignorance.
Aaberg123 1 year ago
@Aaberg123 Since my parents aren't apes they don't resemble them or should I say didn't since my parents have been dead a long time. Further more any one with an ounce of common sense would know that humans certainly didn't evolve from another animal. You are so stupid its pathetic.
1954phyllis 1 year ago
@1954phyllis
I don't think you really grasp this concept.
Just about all the dogs we see today came from a wolf-like ancestor. Just as dogs, we humans diverged from the other great apes many thousands years ago, slowly shedding most of our hair and gaining a larger brain; since apparently, this was advantageous to us, in the environment we were in. Just like you look like a mix of your parents + extra, so has generation after generation formed the species that exist today.
It's that simple.
Aaberg123 1 year ago 2
@Aaberg123 Do you really think that I believe that garbage that man evolved from great apes many thousands of years ago? We all came from two ancestors who were Adam and Eve. Evolution is such garbage. You really believe fairy tales don't you?
1954phyllis 1 year ago
@1954phyllis
No. Seems like you do, though.
Aaberg123 1 year ago 3
@1954phyllis Er...... did you actually watch the video?? What part of Dr Coyne's very easy to understand lecture do you have problems with? If you have been presented with all this evidence and you still believe in the genesis account, then you are in Dr Coyne's words 'Perverse' (and I dont mean that in any sexual way you must understand). If Special Creation is true, then what is YOUR explanation of the obeserved phenomena, as explained by the video (ie vestigial genes/organs et al)? Goddunnit?
adey5 1 year ago
@1954phyllis Please explain THIS, if Adam and Eve and Cain & Abel (murderered) were the only 4 people on earth, where did Cain's wife come from???? Did Cain get with his mother?? When he was expelled to the land of Nod and built a city, who populated the city?? How did he build a whole city on his own? And Why if there were no people to populate it?? Whatever mumbo-jumbo you make up, can you provide evidence? How does the genesis (ahem...) "explanation" help us combat disease etc?