Its not really The Beatles. Its John and Yoko. Like 'Revolution 9', the other Beatles did their best to keep 'John and Yoko collaborations' off The White album. Thankfully, they won and most of the 'ideas' and 'experiments' went onto the 'Two Virgins' album.
the great thing about the bealtes is that they have over 300 songs and most of them are good = i agree with you but unfortunatlly this aint one of them,well done george martin for managing to keep this off the white album
John was the leader of The Beatles and he did have the best solo career of them all but as far as songs in the Beatles go It's hard to say who wrote the better songs since they were a team. Most of their songs were written by both, only some were written by 1 person
@StraightTwoDVD, maybe you should take your head out of your ass and and shut the fuck up. John Lennon is EASILY the most fantastical and unbelievable song writer. Watch yourself, if you start saying that shit out in public someone might take your balls and shove them down your throat.
good they didnt release this garbage..it is worthy of lennon's horrible solo carreer with the exeption of imagine...
this is mule dick this song...take this crap off...now how the fuck did lennon have the balls to put down mccartn ey for maxwells silver hammer...this is crud...
Go to fuck yourself dumbass. John Lennon's solo career is the best solo career of all of the beatles and he is the ebst single songwriter of all them. He was the main composer in the beatles and it was his band. John and the mondongs, john and the silver beatles, etc... There always was something about John. This song doesn't suck, and sometime in new york city is a good album but polemic.
The debate on this thread about whether or note The Beatles' music was influenced by drugs is just absurd. Read any reliable biography (such as John Lennon A Life by Philip Norman) and you will find all proof you need as if listening to the music wasn't enough. Their early music was fueled by speed; John himself called Rubber Soul "the pot album" and Revolver "the acid ablum".
I think the most hilarious thing is that with the exception of John (who was a true junkie) , the fans probably did and thought alot more about drugs than the Beatles did.
@Tpaola238 no johns son brought a picture home about a girl in the sky her name was lucy and she was holding diamonds john thought it was beautiful so he wrote a song about it and never knew it was spelled like that till the 70's
This sounds too cut up and the 2 versions do not blend well, but i understand what your trying to convey. In the demo the chorus is catchier. But the version from Anthology 3 is the best one. I love this song.
I could swear I downloaded a recorded version of this with the Beatles and Syd Barrett. Noticably all blasted. Don't have it any more ... was on an old HD. Downloaded it from some P2P site ... which I don't do any more, btw. (Today i practise safe surfing)
It's been proven that Syd Barrett was not in the studio with John and Yoko when this was recorded. The myth started because Pink Floyd was recording Piper when The Beatles were recording Pepper.
(2)they feed to them. John was fighting for something that had a vey good concept and now people just swollowed it and threw it up into the side. And for A WWIII I think there is going ot be one and for use that do not care just let "Instant karma hit you in the face" you well see it pretty soon. Unless you live in a suburb were everything may seem like its going well and do not care what is going on around you.
I beileve it is very, very, rare, but I beileve this was put onto a 45 Lp before The Beatles officially decided it was too controversial to make a full release.
isn't this about the time pot was made completely illegal. everyone think with me here. the beatles show up talking about peace and love, smoking joints left and right. then the plant is made illegal and our country goes straight to hell.
not to mention the government hating on lennon into his final year because he spoke FOR THE PEOPLE!!
everyone get ready for WWIII, it's right around the corner and I think it's going to be ugly.
Uh, no. Pot was made illegal many years before, and even then it was because African-Americans were making a successful industry out of it. Most drugs prohibitions were because of racism.
Its def not because the african americans were dealing drugs...It was banned because hemp (the plant marijuana is part of) was replacing wood and other materials, in textiles and paper, as well as other products, big business owners of the time ran a smear campaign so they wouldn't lose money, and it has been illegal since the 30's
Its def not because the african americans were dealing drugs...It was banned because hemp (the plant marijuana is part of) was replacing wood and other materials, in textiles and paper, as well as other products, big business owners of the time ran a smear campaign so they wouldn't lose money, and it has been illegal since the 30's
Of course that's a J. No one's handing someone a sloppy roll your own cigarette. LOL, this is how far we've gone back since then that it isn't instantly recognized by everyone. If one of them had a sugar cube on his tongue, would we be debating if they were clowning around at tea time?
I never heard this before. This just a demo. How can you count this as a Beatles song? This was never released, right? Sounds like they're just screwin' around with an idea for a song.
during my teenage years- a long long time ago- i've heard about the existence of this song...and i was anxious to heart it. but it was not as good as i've expected! anyway...it's the beatles!
Was Ringo arrested? Not sure, but the other 3 were arrested multiple times. McCartney was the only one who had to rot for nine days in a Japanese prison, though.
Uh-uh, it never happened. Syd never recorded a note with Lennon or the Beatles. I've seen the Mp3 that says that. It's been floating about for years, but it's just the normal bootlegged take of the song.
"What's the New Mary Jane" is a Lennon song recorded as a Demo during White Album sessions. Original demo has all 4 Beatles, this versin combines original demo with Studio sessions.
this song is more syd barret
gaham99 6 months ago
GET high till i die !
vadikvadik2 7 months ago
wat ashame mary jane ahad a pain at the party!
kate3471 10 months ago
groovie spagetti?! Verry I am the wallrus
jontebiogas10 11 months ago
lolwut?
devdief614 1 year ago
Help make my Album
Im a Beatles fan and try to keep the essence of there music going
Go On Only takes a minute!
youtube.com/user/RussellEdmondsmusic?feature=mhum
RussellEdmondsmusic 1 year ago
were did u get the video of the Beatles smoking weed
jandjreptiles 1 year ago
I think you all ought to cross-check with Syd Barrett here as there is a slightly different recording of Syd (allegedly) and John singing this song.
JuneJune1950 1 year ago
mary jane = marijuana
shaneb343 1 year ago
amazing psichedelic session...ouuuuuuuuch what a trip...ahahahahahahha fantastic...i love you boy...eternal love...
oscarclash 1 year ago
@TheTrollKing123 they do not there's no one who they top them .this song was just them playing around
fuzzy1012 1 year ago
1:20 George looks so much like my friend Dave it's crazy.
Subhuman80 1 year ago
Its not really The Beatles. Its John and Yoko. Like 'Revolution 9', the other Beatles did their best to keep 'John and Yoko collaborations' off The White album. Thankfully, they won and most of the 'ideas' and 'experiments' went onto the 'Two Virgins' album.
ipolson 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the great thing about the bealtes is that they have over 300 songs and most of them are good = i agree with you but unfortunatlly this aint one of them,well done george martin for managing to keep this off the white album
chancebf324 1 year ago
i like the lennon solo version much better. i find it less cheesy and more mental.
10menonachest 1 year ago
the great thing about the bealtes is that they have over 300 songs and most of them are good
janesmusic11 1 year ago
what a jane had a merry shame at the party..........
Shamagogue 1 year ago
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee........
Shamagogue 1 year ago
I realy like the melody. Too bad Johns relationship with drugs where to friendly in the later years...
jontebiogas10 1 year ago
hmmm..........
DLDamon1 1 year ago
John was the leader of The Beatles and he did have the best solo career of them all but as far as songs in the Beatles go It's hard to say who wrote the better songs since they were a team. Most of their songs were written by both, only some were written by 1 person
cmoretti04 1 year ago
@cmoretti04 Wow, that's just my opinion, great comment you posted, i totally agree with you.
WiltatKansas 1 year ago
waa!! geneal xD
joorgeish 1 year ago
Just goes to show, even The Beatles could have off days. It's quite obvious why they didn't release this.
4string59 1 year ago
beautiful song <3
Diddlify 1 year ago
@StraightTwoDVD, maybe you should take your head out of your ass and and shut the fuck up. John Lennon is EASILY the most fantastical and unbelievable song writer. Watch yourself, if you start saying that shit out in public someone might take your balls and shove them down your throat.
KJJKish 1 year ago
i love the beatles,,
i have sence as long as i can remember
but this is
AWFULL
>=-o
aww.
itbbe 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
and dont forget paul wrote:
- get back
- back in the ussr
haha nigga boy bitch..i just fucked you up and made you my little bitch..now bend over nigga
StraightTwoDVD 1 year ago
@StraightTwoDVD You're a moron...
ereid23 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
good they didnt release this garbage..it is worthy of lennon's horrible solo carreer with the exeption of imagine...
this is mule dick this song...take this crap off...now how the fuck did lennon have the balls to put down mccartn ey for maxwells silver hammer...this is crud...
StraightTwoDVD 2 years ago
You retarded, Lennon is the best songwriter ever existed.
WiltatKansas 1 year ago 5
no he isnt....and he'd tell you the same...he was great during his beatles period..and over all mediocre in his solo career...
sorry but the truth hurts...you never would read where paul would say a john song sucked..
but john said pauls songs sucked like "maxwell's silver hammer", "hello goodbye" , "birthday" etc...
well this maryjane song sucks as did johns "sometime in new york city" album, "mind games" was mediocre compared to "band on the run"..
lick my nuts nigga
StraightTwoDVD 1 year ago
Go to fuck yourself dumbass. John Lennon's solo career is the best solo career of all of the beatles and he is the ebst single songwriter of all them. He was the main composer in the beatles and it was his band. John and the mondongs, john and the silver beatles, etc... There always was something about John. This song doesn't suck, and sometime in new york city is a good album but polemic.
WiltatKansas 1 year ago
It was the sixties for fucs sake!
Of course the were on drugs.
Lawrence Welk and country stars were on drugs. Mike Brady was blowing guys in gay night clubs. Wake up and accept it for what it really was people !
uhjigali 2 years ago 3
The debate on this thread about whether or note The Beatles' music was influenced by drugs is just absurd. Read any reliable biography (such as John Lennon A Life by Philip Norman) and you will find all proof you need as if listening to the music wasn't enough. Their early music was fueled by speed; John himself called Rubber Soul "the pot album" and Revolver "the acid ablum".
illinoisan 2 years ago
I like mp4ify for converting utube videos as mp3 or mp4 - its fast..
minazahazazugemo 2 years ago
I think the most hilarious thing is that with the exception of John (who was a true junkie) , the fans probably did and thought alot more about drugs than the Beatles did.
basenjib123 2 years ago
@basenjib123
John (who was a true junkie). Source?
sandyarab1 2 years ago
i wish the world was a little more beatles nowadays (the emotion of beatles)
fightinglucan 2 years ago 22
sorry to burst your bubbler there Theholdplague but they never made music under the influence of anything, they just couldnt.
flywhiteguy32 2 years ago
@flywhiteguy32 just listen to lucy in the sky and some other things on sgt pepper`s...
nosebugger 2 years ago
not true. lucy in the sky was writen under lsd
Tpaola238 2 years ago
@Tpaola238 no johns son brought a picture home about a girl in the sky her name was lucy and she was holding diamonds john thought it was beautiful so he wrote a song about it and never knew it was spelled like that till the 70's
TheBeatlesInMyLife 1 year ago
maybe more at 1:08. never noticed that huge fatty =D
glovermm 2 years ago 2
1:13
Passing the joint!
Looked like a fatty too.
xsusaninsanityx 2 years ago 4
Lol i think they were high as hell when they made this... lol still good.
Thegoldplague 2 years ago 3
this is so RANDOM
bloodandchocolateO 2 years ago
wata shame mary jane had pain at the party
sonobagon13 2 years ago
any beatle song is good
marylovesthebeatles 2 years ago 2
This sounds too cut up and the 2 versions do not blend well, but i understand what your trying to convey. In the demo the chorus is catchier. But the version from Anthology 3 is the best one. I love this song.
dylanfan1969 2 years ago
Thanks for the comment. I tried to do clean edits, but I know that the last one was not that slick.
erbrock 2 years ago
it is not one of my favorites ...
maaydot 2 years ago
i think they were on something when they wrote this song but they where on stuff when they wrote all of there songs but this one sucks
OUTinSPACE40 2 years ago
not the best Beatles song...Still great because its the Beatles
MrDoomStoner 2 years ago 11
@MrDoomStoner They were humans, not just the great musicians , they were kidding and joking.
alikisssa 1 year ago
@MrDoomStoner still great because it great
theoldgeneration 1 year ago
not my favorite of all the beatles songs.....
NinjaPlatypus42 2 years ago
faltou o Syd Barrett
alexandreperina 2 years ago 3
manson was delegating his murders at this time. nobody mentions that.. rosemarys baby was all ready made
cshargeit 2 years ago
Khool is rUlIng!!!!
thawthepast 2 years ago
I could swear I downloaded a recorded version of this with the Beatles and Syd Barrett. Noticably all blasted. Don't have it any more ... was on an old HD. Downloaded it from some P2P site ... which I don't do any more, btw. (Today i practise safe surfing)
AuntThebe 2 years ago
It's been proven that Syd Barrett was not in the studio with John and Yoko when this was recorded. The myth started because Pink Floyd was recording Piper when The Beatles were recording Pepper.
cactaceous 2 years ago
I like the song title a lot lol but the song isnt one of they're best
nubapowner5000 2 years ago
yeah this song sucks balls
but smoke weed everyday folks
JimmyPage7777 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Is this Mary Jane as what they called joints back then? lol :P
mcowned1 2 years ago
u are so stupid
nubapowner5000 2 years ago
?weed is still called mary jane
JimmyPage7777 2 years ago
(2)they feed to them. John was fighting for something that had a vey good concept and now people just swollowed it and threw it up into the side. And for A WWIII I think there is going ot be one and for use that do not care just let "Instant karma hit you in the face" you well see it pretty soon. Unless you live in a suburb were everything may seem like its going well and do not care what is going on around you.
takeahit123 2 years ago
that is why this country has gone to hell because people do not care what is going on anymore they just take in all the materilistic possesions
takeahit123 2 years ago 2
reinds me of 'Les Claypools Frog Brigade'
well i suppose that reminds me of this.
=]
x
MollyDollyMadGurl 2 years ago
I beileve it is very, very, rare, but I beileve this was put onto a 45 Lp before The Beatles officially decided it was too controversial to make a full release.
Bluesmen88 2 years ago
@thighmister: your wrong... just wrong...
Skowcraft 2 years ago
isn't this about the time pot was made completely illegal. everyone think with me here. the beatles show up talking about peace and love, smoking joints left and right. then the plant is made illegal and our country goes straight to hell.
not to mention the government hating on lennon into his final year because he spoke FOR THE PEOPLE!!
everyone get ready for WWIII, it's right around the corner and I think it's going to be ugly.
jeeperjus 2 years ago
What makes you so sure it'll be ugly? Maybe it'll be AWSOME!! Like Star Wars!
thighmister 2 years ago 3
things are what they are so shut up we dont care
musicalnine 2 years ago
that comment really shows why this country has gone to shit, "shut up we don't care"
jeeperjus 2 years ago 3
Uh, no. Pot was made illegal many years before, and even then it was because African-Americans were making a successful industry out of it. Most drugs prohibitions were because of racism.
Kermit4Prezident 2 years ago 7
Its def not because the african americans were dealing drugs...It was banned because hemp (the plant marijuana is part of) was replacing wood and other materials, in textiles and paper, as well as other products, big business owners of the time ran a smear campaign so they wouldn't lose money, and it has been illegal since the 30's
Autumntrampoline1 2 years ago
i bet u got that from family guy lol. its illegal cause the u.s. believed marijuana was coming from immagrants, something like that
EpiphoneLover4u 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Its def not because the african americans were dealing drugs...It was banned because hemp (the plant marijuana is part of) was replacing wood and other materials, in textiles and paper, as well as other products, big business owners of the time ran a smear campaign so they wouldn't lose money, and it has been illegal since the 30's
Autumntrampoline1 2 years ago
i bet you are a politically correct southern, aren't you, you stupid american redneck...
12Junior5 2 years ago
That is why the 30"s FASCIST still exist...social welfare and her jobs hooked on DRUGS
thawthepast 2 years ago
DRUGS?!
You capitalized it so it must be TERRIBLE, especially if it somehow connected to FASCISM!
Kermit4Prezident 2 years ago
This song were written under the influence of GHB and extacy and they performed it 1962-64 as an extra number!
Melchersson 2 years ago
this is incredible, but not as good as take 4
Beatlesfan50 3 years ago
Ha! I do believe that's a joint someone is passing to Paul at 1:10
liberalchick06 3 years ago 4
thats called a cigarette. tobacco leaves
octopussy6814 3 years ago
Could be but I dunno looks like a joint to me. Why would they be passing around a cigarette?
liberalchick06 3 years ago 5
yeah thats a cigarette for sure. smoke is too thin
Preisellack 3 years ago
Of course that's a J. No one's handing someone a sloppy roll your own cigarette. LOL, this is how far we've gone back since then that it isn't instantly recognized by everyone. If one of them had a sugar cube on his tongue, would we be debating if they were clowning around at tea time?
Amhlair 3 years ago
Thank you! I know I'm not crazy. That's no cigarette. I've seen enough joints to recognize one. lol
liberalchick06 3 years ago
hehe i think mary jane = marijuana
mainman124943jj 3 years ago 3
ive got a version of this on "yesterday + today" sessions boot....lasting 5.30..that i got in 98....excellant vid
butlincat 3 years ago
This isnt on the White Album...
?
MSKIZZLES 3 years ago
NO.
lauraHUSSEINharrison 3 years ago
i know it's not...
THat's why i said it isn't....
MSKIZZLES 3 years ago
OMG! WEll....im sorry i was drinking last night, i did read wrong.
lauraHUSSEINharrison 3 years ago
Great film footage. Good shot of George and Geoff Emerick at 1:39
IDLERACER 3 years ago
I never heard this before. This just a demo. How can you count this as a Beatles song? This was never released, right? Sounds like they're just screwin' around with an idea for a song.
Banghouseisaphony 3 years ago
fa cacareeeeeeee
sweetyears17 3 years ago
worst beatles song ever!!
sorry if i affend any1
it's just bad!!
even for the beatles...
tg2258 3 years ago
during my teenage years- a long long time ago- i've heard about the existence of this song...and i was anxious to heart it. but it was not as good as i've expected! anyway...it's the beatles!
gazuaman 3 years ago
hmmm... I wonder what THIS song is about!
lemurs366 3 years ago
I had the impression it was about Marijuana. I may be wrong.
manbigus 3 years ago
oh, john sounds like syd barrett!
innergroov2 3 years ago
I think it would be the other way round.
WiltatKansas 3 years ago
Very nice Beatles tune.
wawahzat16 3 years ago
man, how could this guy make fun of a good song
starmzan1472 3 years ago 5
Because he is a genius?
WiltatKansas 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is not the real version of this song
this is just a fucked up messed up version
some ones trying to make fun of it
FinchBros 3 years ago
Mary Jane ;D
Frizkinhaz 3 years ago 4
Was Ringo arrested? Not sure, but the other 3 were arrested multiple times. McCartney was the only one who had to rot for nine days in a Japanese prison, though.
superman11978 3 years ago
Im pretty sure Ringo is the only one who was never arrested
TheJaywalkers 3 years ago 2
Mary Jane?
How did the police not get these guys?
Mari Juana
chinapants101 3 years ago
pretty much all of them have been arrested once
justinplank 3 years ago
money talks..............
altonzee 3 years ago
John Lennon's songs are so damn unique, he was a classic for his life and times.
uRturdz 3 years ago 21
the song is actually called "What's the new Mary jane"
kikawave 3 years ago 14
mega poops!!
mcspeel 3 years ago
they sung like drunk...is mary jane their talking is maijuana..?
wala1989 4 years ago
yeah
DRp350 3 years ago
haha i love the way he says party...
kikawave 4 years ago 5
the greatest song of all time and i am not kidding about that
jillhaileybennyryan 4 years ago 3
I love the Beatles but i cant abide injokery!
Aenthrallya1 4 years ago
this footage was actually from the early recording
for Hey Jude.
ogo57 4 years ago
uh uh, this song is obviously about me!!!
marijanie333 4 years ago
jaja q buenaa es esta cancion!! es totalmente frita.. and i liked!
vaneg212 4 years ago
that's the randomness of the boys that i know and love. <3
TinkerbellKat 4 years ago
well when you get it right grt back to me.
69down 4 years ago
actually no george jsut john yoko and george martin
julz415 4 years ago
this song is the s@#t, good job on getting this.its realy rear to here this again.
SLAPURASS 4 years ago 2
actually, this song consists of John, Yoko and George Harrison only
drut1 4 years ago
man this song freaks me out!
69down 4 years ago
lol
schilippe 4 years ago
theres one of these takes with syd barret. really rare you can find it on limewire
elbartoo 4 years ago
Uh-uh, it never happened. Syd never recorded a note with Lennon or the Beatles. I've seen the Mp3 that says that. It's been floating about for years, but it's just the normal bootlegged take of the song.
igloobaron 4 years ago
no syd did jam with john and george with this song. i have a picture of it somewhere.
WatchingTheWheels 4 years ago
oh! I see.
69down 4 years ago
"What's the New Mary Jane" is a Lennon song recorded as a Demo during White Album sessions. Original demo has all 4 Beatles, this versin combines original demo with Studio sessions.
erbrock 4 years ago
what the hell was that?
69down 4 years ago
alittle tribute to pot!!!!-back in the 60's, it was mary jane
moondoggy63 4 years ago 3